# Evaluation and Regression Gate Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this workflow to formalize benchmarking, regression detection, and baseline management around agent or product changes. ## Use this when - Validating changes against prior baselines - Making regressions visible before rollout - Capturing repeatable evaluation evidence ## Expected outcomes - Evaluation runs produce comparable metrics - Baselines are stored after successful validation - Regression triage becomes a workflow instead of an afterthought ## Source synthesis - AGENT33/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md) - AGENT33/docs/use-cases.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/use-cases.md) ## Dedupe notes Combines AGENT33 evaluation lifecycle definitions with evaluation and regression use-case framing. ## Source excerpts ### AGENT33/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md ### 4.3 Evaluation Lifecycle Flow: 1. Create run (`/v1/evaluations/runs`) 2. Submit task results (`/runs/{id}/results`) 3. Compute metrics + gate report 4. Save baseline (`/runs/{id}/baseline`) 5. Triage/resolve regressions ### AGENT33/docs/use-cases.md ## 4. Evaluation and Regression Gates Goal: - Quantify quality and block regressions across PR/merge/release gates. Use these modules: - `api/routes/evaluations.py` - `evaluation/service.py` - `evaluation/gates.py` - `evaluation/regression.py` Typical flow: 1. Create run for gate type (`G-PR`, `G-MRG`, `G-REL`, `G-MON`). 2. Submit task results and quality metadata. 3. Compute metrics and gate verdict. 4. Save baseline for future comparison. 5. Triage/resolve regression records. Best fit: - Teams with golden-task style quality gates.