Skip to main content
EVOKORE// BROWSE
>

./browse/prompts

134 NODES
πŸ“textβ€’3 hours ago

Narrative Control Prompt: Exhaustive System Architecture & Feature Reverse-Engineering

Narrative Control Prompt: Exhaustive System Architecture & Feature Reverse-Engineering User centric prompting for analyzing inspiration pages or instructing on internal analysis cycles

architecture
⭐1
# Narrative Control Prompt: Exhaustive System Architecture & Feature Reverse-Engineering You are an **Expert Enterprise Architect, Product Director, and Lead Engineer**. Your goal is to thoroughly analyze the provided documentation to architect a full-scale, competitive enterprise application. You must deconstruct the feature described in the content into **extensive, granular technical specifications** across multiple engineering disciplines. **CRITICAL INSTRUCTIONS**: - **DO NOT SUMMARIZE**. Be exhaustive. - For every category below, aim to list **10+ specific items** if possible. - Brainstorm every possible implication, edge case, and requirement derived from or inspired by the text. - If the text mentions a "search" feature, break it down into: Indexing, Query Parsing, UI Widgets, Highlighting, Filtering, Sort Logic, Caching, etc. Please output the analysis in the following Markdown format: # 1. Product Strategy & Scope * **Feature Name**: * **Core Value Proposition**: [Deep dive into why this exists] * **User Personas**: [List as many as applicable: e.g. Admin, Power User, Viewer, Auditor, API Consumer...] * **User Stories**: [Extensive list of 10+ granular user stories e.g. "As a User, I want to..."] * **Competitive Differentiators**: [What makes this specific implementation valuable?] # 2. Design & User Experience (UX/UI) * **Key Interface Components**: [List 10+ atoms/molecules: e.g. Data Grid, Filter Chips, Modals, Tooltips, Empty States, Toasts, Dropdowns...] * **Interaction Patterns**: [List 10+ patterns: e.g. Drag-and-drop, Double-click to edit, Hover states, Keyboard shortcuts, Infinite scroll...] * **Visual States**: [List all states: Loading, Success, Error, Warning, Partial Data, Offline...] * **Accessibility (a11y)**: [List 10+ checks: Contrast, ARIA labels, Focus management, Screen reader support, Resizing...] # 3. Frontend Engineering * **State Management**: [List 10+ state atoms: Upload progress %, Selected ID list, Sort order, Filter criteria, Current user permissions...] * **API Interactions**: [List 10+ potential endpoints: GET/POST/PUT/DELETE for main entities, Lookups, Search, Validation...] * **Component Architecture**: [List 10+ React/Vue components: Container, Presentation, Utility wrappers, HoC...] * **Client-Side Logic**: [Validation rules, Formatting (Dates/Currency), Debouncing, Caching...] # 4. Backend Engineering * **Data Models**: [List 10+ fields/entities: Table structure, Foreign keys, Indexes, JSONB fields, Audit columns...] * **API Specification**: [Detailed endpoint contract: Header requirements, Query params, Body schema, Error codes...] * **Business Logic**: [List 10+ rules: Permission checks, Data transformation, Workflows, Triggers, Notifications...] * **Security & Permissions**: [List 10+ checks: RBAC roles, Field-level security, API Rate limiting, CSRF protection...] # 5. Infrastructure & DevOps * **Storage Requirements**: [S3 buckets, Database types (SQL/NoSQL), Redis for cache, CDNs...] * **Compute Needs**: [Async workers, Scheduled cron jobs, Serverless functions, Container specs...] * **Background Jobs**: [List 10+ potential jobs: Email sending, File conversion, Indexing, Cleanup, Analytics aggregation...] * **Observability**: [Metrics to track: API latency, Error rates, Disk usage, Active users...] # 6. Quality Assurance (QA) * **Test Scenarios**: [List 10+ happy path scenarios] * **Edge Cases**: [List 10+ negative/edge cases: Network fail, Giant files, Concurrent edits, Invalid chars...] * **Performance Metrics**: [Specific SLAs: <200ms API, <1s Page load, 99.9% Uptime...] * **Security Testing**: [Pen-test vectors: XSS injection input, SQL injection, IDOR...] # 7. Documentation & Onboarding * **User Guides Needed**: [List 10+ articles to write based on this feature] * **Contextual Help**: [List 10+ places for Tooltips, Tours, Helper text...] * **API Documentation**: [Swagger/OpenAPI requirements] # 8. Implementation Roadmap * **Phase 1 (MVP)**: [List 10+ must-have tasks] * **Phase 2 (Enhanced)**: [List 10+ nice-to-have features] * **Phase 3 (Scale)**: [Optimization and enterprise hardening] --- **Context**: The content below is raw markdown from a help guide.
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ“textβ€’3 hours ago

Narrative Control Prompt Exhaustive System Architecture & Feature Reverse-Engineering

Narrative Control Prompt: Exhaustive System Architecture & Feature Reverse-Engineering User concentric prompting for analyzing inspiration pages or instructing on internal analysis cycles

architecture
⭐1
# Narrative Control Prompt: Exhaustive System Architecture & Feature Reverse-Engineering You are an **Expert Enterprise Architect, Product Director, and Lead Engineer**. Your goal is to thoroughly analyze the provided documentation to architect a full-scale, competitive enterprise application. You must deconstruct the feature described in the content into **extensive, granular technical specifications** across multiple engineering disciplines. **CRITICAL INSTRUCTIONS**: - **DO NOT SUMMARIZE**. Be exhaustive. - For every category below, aim to list **10+ specific items** if possible. - Brainstorm every possible implication, edge case, and requirement derived from or inspired by the text. - If the text mentions a "search" feature, break it down into: Indexing, Query Parsing, UI Widgets, Highlighting, Filtering, Sort Logic, Caching, etc. Please output the analysis in the following Markdown format: # 1. Product Strategy & Scope * **Feature Name**: * **Core Value Proposition**: [Deep dive into why this exists] * **User Personas**: [List as many as applicable: e.g. Admin, Power User, Viewer, Auditor, API Consumer...] * **User Stories**: [Extensive list of 10+ granular user stories e.g. "As a User, I want to..."] * **Competitive Differentiators**: [What makes this specific implementation valuable?] # 2. Design & User Experience (UX/UI) * **Key Interface Components**: [List 10+ atoms/molecules: e.g. Data Grid, Filter Chips, Modals, Tooltips, Empty States, Toasts, Dropdowns...] * **Interaction Patterns**: [List 10+ patterns: e.g. Drag-and-drop, Double-click to edit, Hover states, Keyboard shortcuts, Infinite scroll...] * **Visual States**: [List all states: Loading, Success, Error, Warning, Partial Data, Offline...] * **Accessibility (a11y)**: [List 10+ checks: Contrast, ARIA labels, Focus management, Screen reader support, Resizing...] # 3. Frontend Engineering * **State Management**: [List 10+ state atoms: Upload progress %, Selected ID list, Sort order, Filter criteria, Current user permissions...] * **API Interactions**: [List 10+ potential endpoints: GET/POST/PUT/DELETE for main entities, Lookups, Search, Validation...] * **Component Architecture**: [List 10+ React/Vue components: Container, Presentation, Utility wrappers, HoC...] * **Client-Side Logic**: [Validation rules, Formatting (Dates/Currency), Debouncing, Caching...] # 4. Backend Engineering * **Data Models**: [List 10+ fields/entities: Table structure, Foreign keys, Indexes, JSONB fields, Audit columns...] * **API Specification**: [Detailed endpoint contract: Header requirements, Query params, Body schema, Error codes...] * **Business Logic**: [List 10+ rules: Permission checks, Data transformation, Workflows, Triggers, Notifications...] * **Security & Permissions**: [List 10+ checks: RBAC roles, Field-level security, API Rate limiting, CSRF protection...] # 5. Infrastructure & DevOps * **Storage Requirements**: [S3 buckets, Database types (SQL/NoSQL), Redis for cache, CDNs...] * **Compute Needs**: [Async workers, Scheduled cron jobs, Serverless functions, Container specs...] * **Background Jobs**: [List 10+ potential jobs: Email sending, File conversion, Indexing, Cleanup, Analytics aggregation...] * **Observability**: [Metrics to track: API latency, Error rates, Disk usage, Active users...] # 6. Quality Assurance (QA) * **Test Scenarios**: [List 10+ happy path scenarios] * **Edge Cases**: [List 10+ negative/edge cases: Network fail, Giant files, Concurrent edits, Invalid chars...] * **Performance Metrics**: [Specific SLAs: <200ms API, <1s Page load, 99.9% Uptime...] * **Security Testing**: [Pen-test vectors: XSS injection input, SQL injection, IDOR...] # 7. Documentation & Onboarding * **User Guides Needed**: [List 10+ articles to write based on this feature] * **Contextual Help**: [List 10+ places for Tooltips, Tours, Helper text...] * **API Documentation**: [Swagger/OpenAPI requirements] # 8. Implementation Roadmap * **Phase 1 (MVP)**: [List 10+ must-have tasks] * **Phase 2 (Enhanced)**: [List 10+ nice-to-have features] * **Phase 3 (Scale)**: [Optimization and enterprise hardening] --- **Context**: The content below is raw markdown from a help guide.
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’6 months ago

Semantic Session Checkpointing Pattern

Record lightweight semantic checkpoints at planning, risk, failure, and handoff boundaries while keeping heartbeat outside the model loop.

productivity
⭐1
# Semantic Session Checkpointing Pattern Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this pattern when session continuity matters and you need checkpoints that survive model drift or hard crashes. ## Use this when - Capturing handoff context during long sessions - Checkpointing before risky refactors - Separating liveness tracking from agent behavior ## Expected outcomes - Checkpoint timing becomes explicit and repeatable - Session heartbeat stays reliable even if the model stalls - Handoffs capture task, next action, files touched, and risk ## Source synthesis - REVOKORE/docs/MCP-Integration.md ## Dedupe notes Uses the compact REVOKORE integration guide as a distinct session-state pattern that is not already covered by EVOKORE-MCP or AGENT33 docs. ## Source excerpts ### REVOKORE/docs/MCP-Integration.md ## Recommended MCP Pattern Expose a tool that writes a short checkpoint into the active session: - current task - next action - files touched - blocker or risk The simplest implementation is to call: ```powershell REVOKORE/scripts/Write-AiCliCheckpoint.ps1 -Kind note -Message "working on auth bug" ``` From an MCP server, you can call the same script directly or append JSON lines to `REVOKORE_CHECKPOINT_PATH`.
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ14
docs
πŸ“textβ€’6 months ago

PR Merge Boundary Validation Runbook

Validate chained pull requests at each merge boundary with explicit checks, stale-approval handling, and rollback awareness.

devops
⭐1
# PR Merge Boundary Validation Runbook Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this runbook when a merge sequence spans dependent pull requests and each boundary needs fresh validation. ## Use this when - Managing dependency-chained pull requests - Refreshing stale approvals near merge time - Reducing merge surprises through checkpoint validation ## Expected outcomes - Each merge boundary has a concrete verification step - Review freshness stays visible as branches evolve - Rollback planning is captured before the merge happens ## Source synthesis - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/PR_MERGE_RUNBOOK.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/PR_MERGE_RUNBOOK.md) ## Dedupe notes Keeps the merge-boundary validation concept separate from more general workflow or orchestration docs. ## Source excerpts ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/PR_MERGE_RUNBOOK.md Operator runbook for reliable merges and context-rot prevention. ## Pre-merge Checklist - [ ] PR scope matches approved plan - [ ] PR description is filled using `.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md` - [ ] PR metadata automation check (`scripts/validate-pr-metadata.js`) is passing for pull_request CI runs - [ ] Required tests pass locally/CI - [ ] Docs updated for user-facing behavior changes - [ ] Release-impacting changes called out - [ ] Follow-up issues captured (if any) ## Required Checks by Change Type Use this as the minimum check set before approval and merge: | Change type | Required checks | | --- | --- | | Docs-only changes | `node test-docs-canonical-links.js` | | Ops/docs process changes (`docs/PR_MERGE_RUNBOOK.md`, `next-session.md`, orchestration docs) | `node test-ops-docs-validation.js` and `node test-docs-canonical-links.js` | | Source/tooling/config changes (`src/`, `scripts/`, workflow/config files) | Relevant targeted tests for touched area plus CI-required suite | | Release-flow changes | `node test-npm-release-flow-validation.js` plus docs/link checks | If a PR spans multiple change types, run the union of required checks. ## Reviewer Responsibilities - Confirm PR scope and dependency assumptions are explicit in description. - Confirm PR metadata fields from `.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md` are complete. - Verify required checks for each change type are attached in PR evidence. - Block approval if dependency base PR is not merged or branch is stale. - Approve only the current chain head; do not pre-approve non-head dependent PRs. - Confirm all review conversations are resolved before final approval. - Ensure merge strategy and rollback notes are documented for risky changes. ## Merge Steps 1. Rebase or update branch with latest target branch. 2. Re-run required validations. 3. Confirm reviewer approvals and resolved conversations. 4. Merge via approved strategy. 5. Record merge commit/PR number in tracker. ## Merge-boundary Checkpoints At every dependency merge boundary (`base -> dependent`): 1. Rebase dependent PR branch on latest `main` immediately after parent merge. 2. Re-run required checks and attach updated evidence in PR metadata. 3. Revalidate approvals for the new head state (stale approvals must be refreshed). 4. Confirm merge-boundary revalidation notes are updated before merge. ## Merge-order Controls (Dependency Chain) 1. Define merge order explicitly in PR descriptions (`base -> dependent`). 2. Merge only the current chain head; hold dependents until parent merge is complete. 3. After each merge, rebase ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ€–system promptβ€’6 months ago

Cross-CLI MCP Config Sync

Keep Claude, Cursor, Gemini, and related CLI integrations aligned with a repeatable dry-run and apply workflow.

productivity
⭐1
# Cross-CLI MCP Config Sync Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this skill when multiple AI clients need the same MCP configuration without drifting out of sync. ## Use this when - Rolling out a shared MCP config to multiple clients - Previewing config changes before applying them - Standardizing developer setup across tools ## Expected outcomes - Cross-client MCP setup becomes easier to repeat - Dry-run and apply modes reduce accidental changes - Environment-specific details stay documented near the workflow ## Source synthesis - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/CLI_INTEGRATION.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/CLI_INTEGRATION.md) ## Dedupe notes Uses the dedicated CLI integration guide as the canonical source for config sync instead of duplicating setup notes elsewhere. ## Source excerpts ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/CLI_INTEGRATION.md EVOKORE-MCP isn't just an MCP Server-Ò€—it also ships with natively integrated UI hooks designed to make your AI CLI experience (like Gemini CLI or Claude Code) significantly more powerful and transparent. ## 🍨 The Interactive Status Line When you connect EVOKORE-MCP to your AI Assistant, you can optionally enable the **EVOKORE Status Line**. Every time the AI finishes a thought or a tool execution, this hook intercepts the internal JSON payload and renders a beautiful, color-coded ASCII status bar at the bottom of your terminal showing: - **Location**: Your current working directory. - **Model Identity**: The exact LLM model currently loaded. - **Skill Count**: A live count of the MCP Agent Skills currently indexed in your library. - **Context Window Health**: A dynamic, color-coded progress bar showing exactly how many tokens you have consumed. --- ### 💜 Enabling in Gemini CLI Gemini CLI features a robust native hook engine. You can configure it to execute the EVOKORE Status Line immediately after every model response (`AfterModel`). **Step 1:** Locate your global settings file (`~/.gemini/settings.json`). **Step 2:** Ensure hooks are enabled, and add the `AfterModel` event array to the root of the JSON object: ```json { "enableHooks": true, "hooks": { "AfterModel": [ { "type": "command", "command": "node /absolute/path/to/EVOKORE-MCP/scripts/status.js" } ] } } ``` **Step 3:** Restart your Gemini CLI! --- ### 💜 Enabling in Claude Code Claude Code features an undocumented internal hook architecture that natively supports this status line. *(Note: Because this feature is currently undocumented by Anthropic, Claude Code's `doctor` command will display "Found 1 settings issue". This is perfectly normal and the status line will still execute successfully)*. **Step 1:** Locate your Claude settings file (`~/.claude/settings.json`). **Step 2:** Add the `statusLine` block to the root of the JSON object: ```json { "statusLine": { "type": "command", "command": "node /absolute/path/to/EVOKORE-MCP/scripts/status.js" } } ``` **Step 3:** Restart Claude Code. --- ### Òő ï¸ A Note on GitHub Copilot and Codex Microsoft's GitHub Copilot CLI and OpenAI's Codex CLI **do not natively support** these JSON hook configurations. If you want the EVOKORE Status Line to appear after commands in these tools, you must configure a native PowerShell/Bash alias wrapper around the CLI execution. **Example (PowerShell Profile):** ```powershell function copilot-evokore { gh copilot $args node "/absolute/path/to/EV ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ€–system promptβ€’6 months ago

Hook Observability and Session Replay

Instrument hooks with replayable logs, task-state visibility, and non-blocking observability around agent sessions.

devops
⭐1
# Hook Observability and Session Replay Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this skill when you need to understand what hooks fired, what they emitted, and how a session can be replayed after the fact. ## Use this when - Debugging hook-driven automation - Replaying session events after failures - Adding observability without blocking interactive work ## Expected outcomes - Hook activity becomes inspectable and replayable - Operational state survives beyond a single terminal session - Observability stays useful without overwhelming operators ## Source synthesis - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/VOICE_AND_HOOKS.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/VOICE_AND_HOOKS.md) - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/USE_CASES_AND_WALKTHROUGHS.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/USE_CASES_AND_WALKTHROUGHS.md) ## Dedupe notes Focuses on replay and observability instead of importing the broader voice-sidecar guide verbatim. ## Source excerpts ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/VOICE_AND_HOOKS.md EVOKORE currently has three separate voice-related systems plus a set of hook and observability utilities. They overlap in operator workflows, but they are not the same runtime. ## The three voice-related systems ### 1. ElevenLabs MCP proxy This is the optional `elevenlabs` child server configured in `mcp.config.json`. What it is: - proxied through the EVOKORE router - exposed as prefixed MCP tools - available to any EVOKORE-connected MCP client when configured successfully What it is for: - text-to-speech and other ElevenLabs MCP operations as tools - routing voice-related actions through the standard EVOKORE proxy/security stack Requirements: - `uvx` available on PATH - `ELEVENLABS_API_KEY` set ### 2. VoiceMode VoiceMode is a separate voice-conversation system for Claude Code. What it is: - registered separately from EVOKORE - not routed through EVOKOREÒ€ℒs stdio server - used for bidirectional voice conversation in Claude Code What it is for: - speaking to Claude and hearing spoken responses - using `OPENAI_API_KEY` and VoiceModeÒ€ℒs own runtime Windows note: - VoiceMode relies on `uvx` being directly available - set `OPENAI_API_KEY` in the shell that launches Claude Code ### 3. VoiceSidecar VoiceSidecar is a standalone WebSocket server implemented in `src/Voice ... ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/USE_CASES_AND_WALKTHROUGHS.md This guide turns the runtime contracts into practical operator flows. ## Walkthrough 1: Adopt a workflow from the skill library Use this when you want EVOKORE to retrieve process guidance before the model starts acting. ### Goal Find and adopt an existing workflow such as `session-wrap`. ### Steps 1. Ask the client to search skills: ```text Search the MCP for a workflow about session wrap-up and continuity. ``` 2. EVOKORE uses `search_skills` and returns matching skills. 3. Ask for a specific skill: ```text Show me help for the session-wrap skill. ``` 4. EVOKORE uses `get_skill_help` and returns the skillÒ€ℒs internal instructions. 5. For broader task matching, ask: ```text Resolve a workflow for wrapping this session, documenting open risks, and preparing the next handoff. ``` 6. EVOKORE uses `resolve_workflow` and injects the top 1-3 relevant workflows directly into the tool response. ### Why this matters - keeps the model grounded in repo-specific process - reduces prompt drift - makes handoff and governance behavior repeatable ## Walkthrough 2: Use a proxied tool that requires HITL approval Use this when the tool is configured as `require_approval` in `permissions.yml`. ### Goal Allow a protected proxied tool call such as `fs_write_f ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ€–system promptβ€’6 months ago

Human-in-the-Loop Approval Token Workflow

Gate risky tool execution behind approval tokens so agents can retry safely after a human reviewer signs off.

security
⭐1
# Human-in-the-Loop Approval Token Workflow Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this workflow when autonomous execution needs a durable handoff from human review back into the agent loop. ## Use this when - Retrying a blocked tool call after approval - Adding a human checkpoint to sensitive actions - Reducing insecure workarounds around approval flows ## Expected outcomes - Approval becomes a reusable tokenized workflow - Agents resume work without losing execution context - Security controls stay explicit instead of being implied ## Source synthesis - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/V2_MULTI_AGENT_WORKFLOWS.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/V2_MULTI_AGENT_WORKFLOWS.md) - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/AGENT33_IMPROVEMENT_INSTRUCTIONS.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/AGENT33_IMPROVEMENT_INSTRUCTIONS.md) ## Dedupe notes Synthesizes the approval-token concept from the main workflow doc and the Agent33 improvement transfer notes. ## Source excerpts ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/V2_MULTI_AGENT_WORKFLOWS.md With EVOKORE-MCP v2.0 fully operational, we can now leverage 40+ proxied GitHub and Filesystem tools seamlessly within complex multi-agent workflows. The core architectural advancements include: ## 1. Dynamic Tool Prefixing & Indexing Instead of loading 40+ tools into an LLM's context window statically (which causes massive bloat), EVOKORE's `ProxyManager` boots child servers (like `@modelcontextprotocol/server-github` and `@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem`) and dynamically prefixes their tools (`github_create_issue`, `fs_write_file`). This prevents namespace collisions while keeping the tools accessible to native skills. ## 2. Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) Security Interceptor Automated multi-agent workflows involving sensitive endpoints (like GitHub write access or file deletion) are governed by EVOKORE's stateless `_evokore_approval_token` architecture. - When an agent attempts a restricted action, the tool call is intercepted and blocked. - The server returns an error explicitly commanding the agent to prompt the human for approval. - Upon approval, the agent retries the exact tool call with the injected token, securely fulfilling the workflow without severing the conversational context. ## 3. Active Skill Orchestration (Native Harnessing) Unlike v1.0 where skills merel ... ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/AGENT33_IMPROVEMENT_INSTRUCTIONS.md > **Purpose**: Feed this file into Claude Code CLI when working on the Agent33 repo. It contains patterns, architectures, and capabilities proven in EVOKORE-MCP that Agent33 should adopt. --- ## 1. Multi-Server MCP Aggregation Pattern **What Agent33 lacks**: Agent33's MCP server (Phase 43) is a single-endpoint bridge. It doesn't aggregate multiple child MCP servers behind a unified namespace. **What to build**: A proxy layer that spawns and manages multiple child MCP servers from a single config file, presenting them as one unified tool surface. ### Implementation spec: ``` mcp.config.json { "servers": { "github": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-github"], "env": { "GITHUB_TOKEN": "${GITHUB_TOKEN}" } }, "fs": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem", "./"] }, "elevenlabs": { "command": "uvx", "args": ["elevenlabs-mcp"], "env": { "ELEVENLABS_API_KEY": "${ELEVENLABS_API_KEY}" } } } } ``` **Key patterns from EVOKORE**: - **Tool name prefixing**: Every proxied tool gets renamed `{serverId}_{originalName}` to prevent namespace collisions (e.g., `github_create_issue`, `fs_read_file`). First-registration-wins for duplicates. - **Environment interpolation**: `${VAR}` syntax in `env` blocks resolved ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ“textβ€’6 months ago

Docker-Backed Jupyter Kernel Operator

Operate containerized Jupyter kernels with enablement, smoke checks, cleanup, and failure handling baked into the runbook.

devops
⭐1
# Docker-Backed Jupyter Kernel Operator Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this runbook when you need isolated notebook execution, clear container lifecycle management, and troubleshooting guidance. ## Use this when - Enabling containerized notebook workflows - Cleaning up kernel containers safely - Troubleshooting notebook execution environments ## Expected outcomes - Kernel startup and cleanup steps are documented end-to-end - Failure modes are easier to diagnose - Notebook execution can be repeated without manual guesswork ## Source synthesis - AGENT33/docs/runbooks/jupyter-kernel-containers.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/runbooks/jupyter-kernel-containers.md) ## Dedupe notes Uses the AGENT33 Jupyter container runbook as a focused operations import without duplicating broader walkthroughs. ## Source excerpts ### AGENT33/docs/runbooks/jupyter-kernel-containers.md ## Purpose Operate the Docker-backed Jupyter kernel adapter introduced for Phase 38 Stage 3 / Phase 42 follow-on work. ## Enablement Set: - `JUPYTER_KERNEL_ENABLED=true` - `JUPYTER_KERNEL_MODE=docker` Optional settings: - `JUPYTER_KERNEL_DOCKER_IMAGE` - `JUPYTER_KERNEL_ALLOWED_IMAGES` - `JUPYTER_KERNEL_NETWORK_ENABLED` - `JUPYTER_KERNEL_MOUNT_WORKDIR` - `JUPYTER_KERNEL_CONTAINER_WORKDIR` ## Operational Notes - Docker mode publishes kernel ports to the host and mounts a per-session runtime directory containing the Jupyter connection file. - When `JUPYTER_KERNEL_NETWORK_ENABLED=false`, the adapter starts containers with `--network none`. - Working-directory mounting is opt-in and should only point at paths already approved by workflow / execution policy. - The adapter enforces an image allowlist when one is configured. ## Failure Modes - `jupyter_client not installed`: install with `pip install agent33[jupyter]` - `docker executable not found`: install Docker and ensure `docker` is on `PATH` - `Docker image ... is not permitted`: align the requested image with `JUPYTER_KERNEL_ALLOWED_IMAGES` - kernel startup timeout: inspect Docker logs for the session container and verify the image includes `ipykernel` ## Cleanup - One-shot sessions are removed after execution. - Stateful sessions are removed explicitly or via adapter shutdown. - Forced cleanup uses `docker rm -f <container>` and deletes the runtime connection directory. ## Quick Smoke Workflow Register a minimal workflow that exercises the Docker-backed `code-interpreter` tool: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/workflows/ \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{ "name": "docker-kernel-smoke", "version": "1.0.0", "description": "Validate Docker-backed Jupyter execution", "triggers": {"manual": true}, "inputs": {}, "outputs": { "result": {"type": "object"} }, "steps": [ { "id": "run-notebook-code", "action": "execute-code", "inputs": { "tool_id": "code-interpreter", "language": "python", "code": "print(6 * 7)" } } ], "execution": {"mode": "sequential"} }' ``` Then execute it: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/workflows/docker-kernel-smoke/execute \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"inputs": {}}' ```
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ“textβ€’6 months ago

Improvement Cycle Review Wizard

Run a live improvement-cycle workflow that links review artifacts, approvals, tool requests, and operator checkpoints.

productivity
⭐1
# Improvement Cycle Review Wizard Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this workflow when an operator needs a guided improvement cycle with live status, explicit approvals, and linked artifacts. ## Use this when - Operational review sessions with live progress - Approval-heavy improvement cycles - Coordinating review artifacts with execution steps ## Expected outcomes - Live workflow execution remains visible to operators - Artifacts, approvals, and tool requests stay connected - Improvement loops become easier to audit and rerun ## Source synthesis - AGENT33/docs/phase25-26-live-review-walkthrough.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/phase25-26-live-review-walkthrough.md) - AGENT33/docs/operator-improvement-cycle-and-jupyter.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/operator-improvement-cycle-and-jupyter.md) ## Dedupe notes Merges AGENT33 live review walkthrough details with the shorter operator-focused improvement-cycle guide. ## Source excerpts ### AGENT33/docs/phase25-26-live-review-walkthrough.md This guide documents the operator flow introduced by the Phase 25 live workflow transport and the Phase 26/27 improvement-cycle review wizard stack. ## Scope - Live workflow execution with run-scoped graph refresh - WebSocket-first status streaming with authenticated SSE fallback - Improvement-cycle preset creation - Explanation artifact generation for `plan_review` and `diff_review` - Linked review creation, risk assessment, L1/L2 signoff, and final approval - Pending tool-approval triage inside the same workflow domain > Note > This walkthrough reflects the review stack built on `codex/session58-phase26-wizard` and validated in `codex/session60-phase22-docs-validation`. If the related PRs are still open, `main` may not yet expose every surface described here. ## Operator Flow ```mermaid sequenceDiagram participant UI as "Frontend Control Plane" participant WF as "Workflow APIs" participant VIZ as "Visualization APIs" participant EXP as "Explanation APIs" participant REV as "Review APIs" participant HITL as "Tool Approval APIs" UI->>WF: "POST /v1/workflows/{name}/execute (single mode, caller run_id)" UI->>VIZ: "GET /v1/visualizations/workflows/{workflow_id}/graph?run_id=..." UI->>WF: "WS /v1/workflows/{run_id}/ws" alt "WebSocket unav ... ### AGENT33/docs/operator-improvement-cycle-and-jupyter.md This guide covers the merged operator surfaces for: - the Phase 26 improvement-cycle review wizard - the Phase 27 canonical workflow presets - the Phase 38 Docker-backed Jupyter kernel workflow Use it when you want the shortest current path from UI entry point to a real workflow run. ## 1. Improvement-Cycle Wizard The wizard is mounted inside the frontend control plane under the `Workflows` domain. ### Entry path 1. Open the frontend at `http://localhost:3000` 2. Authenticate with a bearer token or API key 3. Open `Advanced Settings` 4. Select the `Workflows` domain 5. Use the `Improvement Cycle Wizard` panel at the top of the page ### What the wizard does The wizard stitches together the backend surfaces that previously had to be called manually: - plan review / diff review generation - review creation and risk assessment - L1 and L2 review submission - tool approval request review and decision capture Reference implementation: - frontend: `frontend/src/features/improvement-cycle/ImprovementCycleWizard.tsx` - tests: `frontend/src/features/improvement-cycle/ImprovementCycleWizard.test.tsx` For the detailed review flow, keep using: - [`phase25-26-live-review-walkthrough.md`](phase25-26-live-review-walkthrough.md) ## 2. Canonical Workflow Presets The `Workflows` doma ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ“textβ€’6 months ago

Autonomy Budget Lifecycle

Define, approve, enforce, and escalate autonomous execution budgets before agents act on files, commands, or network requests.

productivity
⭐1
# Autonomy Budget Lifecycle Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this lifecycle when you need bounded autonomous execution with approvals, preflight checks, and runtime enforcement. ## Use this when - Running agents with scoped permissions - Escalating risky actions instead of silently proceeding - Adding governance to autonomous sessions ## Expected outcomes - Autonomy state moves through draft, approval, and active phases - Preflight checks happen before execution begins - Escalations are tracked instead of disappearing into logs ## Source synthesis - AGENT33/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md) - AGENT33/docs/use-cases.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/use-cases.md) ## Dedupe notes Collapses autonomy lifecycle and use-case material into a single execution-governance entry. ## Source excerpts ### AGENT33/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md ### 4.4 Autonomy Budget Lifecycle States: - `draft -> pending_approval -> active -> suspended|expired|completed` Flow: 1. Create budget 2. Activate or transition 3. Run preflight checks 4. Create enforcer 5. Evaluate command/file/network requests 6. Track escalations ### AGENT33/docs/use-cases.md ## 3. Autonomous Execution Budgeting Goal: - Enforce hard runtime limits for file, command, and network activity. Use these modules: - `api/routes/autonomy.py` - `autonomy/service.py` - `autonomy/enforcement.py` - `autonomy/preflight.py` Typical flow: 1. Create and activate budget. 2. Run preflight checks. 3. Attach runtime enforcer. 4. Gate each file/command/network action through enforcement APIs. 5. Trigger and resolve escalations. Best fit: - High-control automation in regulated or sensitive environments.
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ“textβ€’6 months ago

Guardrailed Code Review Pipeline

Run a staged code review workflow with explicit risk assessment, reviewer handoffs, and merge gates.

coding
⭐1
# Guardrailed Code Review Pipeline Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this workflow when a change needs structured review evidence, clear approval stages, and a rollback-aware path to merge. ## Use this when - Multi-step L1 and L2 review signoff - High-risk changes that need audit trails - Standardizing reviewer decisions before merge ## Expected outcomes - Review states and approval checkpoints stay explicit - Risk assessment and evidence are captured before merge - The workflow remains small enough to reuse across repositories ## Source synthesis - AGENT33/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md) - AGENT33/docs/walkthroughs.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/walkthroughs.md) ## Dedupe notes Combines AGENT33 lifecycle mapping and operator walkthrough material into one review-oriented site entry. ## Source excerpts ### AGENT33/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md ### 4.1 Review Lifecycle States: - `draft -> ready -> l1-review -> l1-approved -> (optional l2-review -> l2-approved) -> approved -> merged` Main APIs: - `/v1/reviews/{id}/assess` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/assign-l1` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/l1` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/assign-l2` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/l2` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/approve` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/merge` ### AGENT33/docs/walkthroughs.md ## 4. Review Lifecycle (Two-Layer Signoff) Create review: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/ \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"task_id":"TASK-101","branch":"feat/docs-refresh","pr_number":12}' ``` Assess risk: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/assess \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"triggers":["api-public","security"]}' ``` Move to ready and assign L1: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/ready -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/assign-l1 -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" ``` Submit L1 decision: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/l1 \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"decision":"approved","issues":[],"comments":"L1 pass"}' ``` If L2 required, continue: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/assign-l2 -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/l2 \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"decision":"approved","issues":[],"commen ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

defi-protocol-templates

Implement DeFi protocols with production-ready templates for

coding
⭐1
# DeFi Protocol Templates Production-ready templates for common DeFi protocols including staking, AMMs, governance, lending, and flash loans. ## When to Use This Skill - Building staking platforms with reward distribution - Implementing AMM (Automated Market Maker) protocols - Creating governance token systems - Developing lending/borrowing protocols - Integrating flash loan functionality - Launching yield farming platforms ## Staking Contract ```solidity // SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT pragma solidity ^0.8.0; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/IERC20.sol"; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/security/ReentrancyGuard.sol"; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol"; contract StakingRewards is ReentrancyGuard, Ownable { IERC20 public stakingToken; IERC20 public rewardsToken; uint256 public rewardRate = 100; // Rewards per second uint256 public lastUpdateTime; uint256 public rewardPerTokenStored; mapping(address => uint256) public userRewardPerTokenPaid; mapping(address => uint256) public rewards; mapping(address => uint256) public balances; uint256 private _totalSupply; event Staked(address indexed user, uint256 amount); event Withdrawn(address indexed user, uint256 amount); event RewardPaid(address indexed user, uint256 reward); constructor(address _stakingToken, address _rewardsToken) { stakingToken = IERC20(_stakingToken); rewardsToken = IERC20(_rewardsToken); } modifier updateReward(address account) { rewardPerTokenStored = rewardPerToken(); lastUpdateTime = block.timestamp; if (account != address(0)) { rewards[account] = earned(account); userRewardPerTokenPaid[account] = rewardPerTokenStored; } _; } function rewardPerToken() public view returns (uint256) { if (_totalSupply == 0) { return rewardPerTokenStored; } return rewardPerTokenStored + ((block.timestamp - lastUpdateTime) * rewardRate * 1e18) / _totalSupply; } function earned(address account) public view returns (uint256) { return (balances[account] * (rewardPerToken() - userRewardPerTokenPaid[account])) / 1e18 + rewards[account]; } function stake(uint256 amount) external nonReentrant updateReward(msg.sender) { require(amount > 0, "Cannot stake 0"); _totalSupply += amount; balances[msg.sender] += amount; stakingToken.transferFrom(msg.sender, address(this), amount); emit Staked(msg.sender, amount); } function withdraw(uint256 amount) public nonReentrant updateReward(msg.sender) { require(amount > 0, "Cannot withdraw 0"); _totalSupply -= amount; balances[msg.sender] -= amount; stakingToken.transfer(msg.sender, amount); emit Withdrawn(msg.sender, amount); } function getReward() public nonReentrant updateReward(msg.sender) { uint256 reward = rewards[msg.sender]; if (reward > 0) { rewards[msg.sender] = 0; rewardsToken.transfer(msg.sender, reward); emit RewardPaid(msg.sender, reward); } } function exit() external { withdraw(balances[msg.sender]); getReward(); } } ``` ## AMM (Automated Market Maker) ```solidity // SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT pragma solidity ^0.8.0; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/IERC20.sol"; contract SimpleAMM { IERC20 public token0; IERC20 public token1; uint256 public reserve0; uint256 public reserve1; uint256 public totalSupply; mapping(address => uint256) public balanceOf; event Mint(address indexed to, uint256 amount); event Burn(address indexed from, uint256 amount); event Swap(address indexed trader, uint256 amount0In, uint256 amount1In, uint256 amount0Out, uint256 amount1Out); constructor(address _token0, address _token1) { token0 = IERC20(_token0); token1 = IERC20(_token1); } function addLiquidity(uint256 amount0, uint256 amount1) external returns (uint256 shares) { token0.transferFrom(msg.sender, address(this), amount0); token1.transferFrom(msg.sender, address(this), amount1); if (totalSupply == 0) { shares = sqrt(amount0 * amount1); } else { shares = min( (amount0 * totalSupply) / reserve0, (amount1 * totalSupply) / reserve1 ); } require(shares > 0, "Shares = 0"); _mint(msg.sender, shares); _update( token0.balanceOf(address(this)), token1.balanceOf(address(this)) ); emit Mint(msg.sender, shares); } function removeLiquidity(uint256 shares) external returns (uint256 amount0, uint256 amount1) { uint256 bal0 = token0.balanceOf(address(this)); uint256 bal1 = token1.balanceOf(address(this)); amount0 = (shares * bal0) / totalSupply; amount1 = (shares * bal1) / totalSupply; require(amount0 > 0 && amount1 > 0, "Amount0 or amount1 = 0"); _burn(msg.sender, shares); _update(bal0 - amount0, bal1 - amount1); token0.transfer(msg.sender, amount0); token1.transfer(msg.sender, amount1); emit Burn(msg.sender, shares); } function swap(address tokenIn, uint256 amountIn) external returns (uint256 amountOut) { require(tokenIn == address(token0) || tokenIn == address(token1), "Invalid token"); bool isToken0 = tokenIn == address(token0); (IERC20 tokenIn_, IERC20 tokenOut, uint256 resIn, uint256 resOut) = isToken0 ? (token0, token1, reserve0, reserve1) : (token1, token0, reserve1, reserve0); tokenIn_.transferFrom(msg.sender, address(this), amountIn); // 0.3% fee uint256 amountInWithFee = (amountIn * 997) / 1000; amountOut = (resOut * amountInWithFee) / (resIn + amountInWithFee); tokenOut.transfer(msg.sender, amountOut); _update( token0.balanceOf(address(this)), token1.balanceOf(address(this)) ); emit Swap(msg.sender, isToken0 ? amountIn : 0, isToken0 ? 0 : amountIn, isToken0 ? 0 : amountOut, isToken0 ? amountOut : 0); } function _mint(address to, uint256 amount) private { balanceOf[to] += amount; totalSupply += amount; } function _burn(address from, uint256 amount) private { balanceOf[from] -= amount; totalSupply -= amount; } function _update(uint256 res0, uint256 res1) private { reserve0 = res0; reserve1 = res1; } function sqrt(uint256 y) private pure returns (uint256 z) { if (y > 3) { z = y; uint256 x = y / 2 + 1; while (x < z) { z = x; x = (y / x + x) / 2; } } else if (y != 0) { z = 1; } } function min(uint256 x, uint256 y) private pure returns (uint256) { return x <= y ? x : y; } } ``` ## Governance Token ```solidity // SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT pragma solidity ^0.8.0; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/extensions/ERC20Votes.sol"; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol"; contract GovernanceToken is ERC20Votes, Ownable { constructor() ERC20("Governance Token", "GOV") ERC20Permit("Governance Token") { _mint(msg.sender, 1000000 * 10**decimals()); } function _afterTokenTransfer( address from, address to, uint256 amount ) internal override(ERC20Votes) { super._afterTokenTransfer(from, to, amount); } function _mint(address to, uint256 amount) internal override(ERC20Votes) { super._mint(to, amount); } function _burn(address account, uint256 amount) internal override(ERC20Votes) { super._burn(account, amount); } } contract Governor is Ownable { GovernanceToken public governanceToken; struct Proposal { uint256 id; address proposer; string description; uint256 forVotes; uint256 againstVotes; uint256 startBlock; uint256 endBlock; bool executed; mapping(address => bool) hasVoted; } uint256 public proposalCount; mapping(uint256 => Proposal) public proposals; uint256 public votingPeriod = 17280; // ~3 days in blocks uint256 public proposalThreshold = 100000 * 10**18; event ProposalCreated(uint256 indexed proposalId, address proposer, string description); event VoteCast(address indexed voter, uint256 indexed proposalId, bool support, uint256 weight); event ProposalExecuted(uint256 indexed proposalId); constructor(address _governanceToken) { governanceToken = GovernanceToken(_governanceToken); } function propose(string memory description) external returns (uint256) { require( governanceToken.getPastVotes(msg.sender, block.number - 1) >= proposalThreshold, "Proposer votes below threshold" ); proposalCount++; Proposal storage newProposal = proposals[proposalCount]; newProposal.id = proposalCount; newProposal.proposer = msg.sender; newProposal.description = description; newProposal.startBlock = block.number; newProposal.endBlock = block.number + votingPeriod; emit ProposalCreated(proposalCount, msg.sender, description); return proposalCount; } function vote(uint256 proposalId, bool support) external { Proposal storage proposal = proposals[proposalId]; require(block.number >= proposal.startBlock, "Voting not started"); require(block.number <= proposal.endBlock, "Voting ended"); require(!proposal.hasVoted[msg.sender], "Already voted"); uint256 weight = governanceToken.getPastVotes(msg.sender, proposal.startBlock); require(weight > 0, "No voting power"); proposal.hasVoted[msg.sender] = true; if (support) { proposal.forVotes += weight; } else { proposal.againstVotes += weight; } emit VoteCast(msg.sender, proposalId, support, weight); } function execute(uint256 proposalId) external { Proposal storage proposal = proposals[proposalId]; require(block.number > proposal.endBlock, "Voting not ended"); require(!proposal.executed, "Already executed"); require(proposal.forVotes > proposal.againstVotes, "Proposal failed"); proposal.executed = true; // Execute proposal logic here emit ProposalExecuted(proposalId); } } ``` ## Flash Loan ```solidity // SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT pragma solidity ^0.8.0; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/IERC20.sol"; interface IFlashLoanReceiver { function executeOperation( address asset, uint256 amount, uint256 fee, bytes calldata params ) external returns (bool); } contract FlashLoanProvider { IERC20 public token; uint256 public feePercentage = 9; // 0.09% fee event FlashLoan(address indexed borrower, uint256 amount, uint256 fee); constructor(address _token) { token = IERC20(_token); } function flashLoan( address receiver, uint256 amount, bytes calldata params ) external { uint256 balanceBefore = token.balanceOf(address(this)); require(balanceBefore >= amount, "Insufficient liquidity"); uint256 fee = (amount * feePercentage) / 10000; // Send tokens to receiver token.transfer(receiver, amount); // Execute callback require( IFlashLoanReceiver(receiver).executeOperation( address(token), amount, fee, params ), "Flash loan failed" ); // Verify repayment uint256 balanceAfter = token.balanceOf(address(this)); require(balanceAfter >= balanceBefore + fee, "Flash loan not repaid"); emit FlashLoan(receiver, amount, fee); } } // Example flash loan receiver contract FlashLoanReceiver is IFlashLoanReceiver { function executeOperation( address asset, uint256 amount, uint256 fee, bytes calldata params ) external override returns (bool) { // Decode params and execute arbitrage, liquidation, etc. // ... // Approve repayment IERC20(asset).approve(msg.sender, amount + fee); return true; } } ``` ## Resources - **references/staking.md**: Staking mechanics and reward distribution - **references/liquidity-pools.md**: AMM mathematics and pricing - **references/governance-tokens.md**: Governance and voting systems - **references/lending-protocols.md**: Lending/borrowing implementation - **references/flash-loans.md**: Flash loan security and use cases - **assets/staking-contract.sol**: Production staking template - **assets/amm-contract.sol**: Full AMM implementation - **assets/governance-token.sol**: Governance system - **assets/lending-protocol.sol**: Lending platform template ## Best Practices 1. **Use Established Libraries**: OpenZeppelin, Solmate 2. **Test Thoroughly**: Unit tests, integration tests, fuzzing 3. **Audit Before Launch**: Professional security audits 4. **Start Simple**: MVP first, add features incrementally 5. **Monitor**: Track contract health and user activity 6. **Upgradability**: Consider proxy patterns for upgrades 7. **Emergency Controls**: Pause mechanisms for critical issues ## Common DeFi Patterns - **Time-Weighted Average Price (TWAP)**: Price oracle resistance - **Liquidity Mining**: Incentivize liquidity provision - **Vesting**: Lock tokens with gradual release - **Multisig**: Require multiple signatures for critical operations - **Timelocks**: Delay execution of governance decisions
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

cqrs-implementation

Implement Command Query Responsibility Segregation for scalable

coding
⭐1
# CQRS Implementation Comprehensive guide to implementing CQRS (Command Query Responsibility Segregation) patterns. ## When to Use This Skill - Separating read and write concerns - Scaling reads independently from writes - Building event-sourced systems - Optimizing complex query scenarios - Different read/write data models needed - High-performance reporting requirements ## Core Concepts ### 1. CQRS Architecture ``` β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ Client β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ β”‚ β–Ό β–Ό β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ Commands β”‚ β”‚ Queries β”‚ β”‚ API β”‚ β”‚ API β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚ β”‚ β–Ό β–Ό β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ Command β”‚ β”‚ Query β”‚ β”‚ Handlers β”‚ β”‚ Handlers β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚ β”‚ β–Ό β–Ό β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ Write │─────────►│ Read β”‚ β”‚ Model β”‚ Events β”‚ Model β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ ``` ### 2. Key Components | Component | Responsibility | | ------------------- | ------------------------------- | | **Command** | Intent to change state | | **Command Handler** | Validates and executes commands | | **Event** | Record of state change | | **Query** | Request for data | | **Query Handler** | Retrieves data from read model | | **Projector** | Updates read model from events | ## Templates ### Template 1: Command Infrastructure ```python from abc import ABC, abstractmethod from dataclasses import dataclass from typing import TypeVar, Generic, Dict, Any, Type from datetime import datetime import uuid # Command base @dataclass class Command: command_id: str = None timestamp: datetime = None def __post_init__(self): self.command_id = self.command_id or str(uuid.uuid4()) self.timestamp = self.timestamp or datetime.utcnow() # Concrete commands @dataclass class CreateOrder(Command): customer_id: str items: list shipping_address: dict @dataclass class AddOrderItem(Command): order_id: str product_id: str quantity: int price: float @dataclass class CancelOrder(Command): order_id: str reason: str # Command handler base T = TypeVar('T', bound=Command) class CommandHandler(ABC, Generic[T]): @abstractmethod async def handle(self, command: T) -> Any: pass # Command bus class CommandBus: def __init__(self): self._handlers: Dict[Type[Command], CommandHandler] = {} def register(self, command_type: Type[Command], handler: CommandHandler): self._handlers[command_type] = handler async def dispatch(self, command: Command) -> Any: handler = self._handlers.get(type(command)) if not handler: raise ValueError(f"No handler for {type(command).__name__}") return await handler.handle(command) # Command handler implementation class CreateOrderHandler(CommandHandler[CreateOrder]): def __init__(self, order_repository, event_store): self.order_repository = order_repository self.event_store = event_store async def handle(self, command: CreateOrder) -> str: # Validate if not command.items: raise ValueError("Order must have at least one item") # Create aggregate order = Order.create( customer_id=command.customer_id, items=command.items, shipping_address=command.shipping_address ) # Persist events await self.event_store.append_events( stream_id=f"Order-{order.id}", stream_type="Order", events=order.uncommitted_events ) return order.id ``` ### Template 2: Query Infrastructure ```python from abc import ABC, abstractmethod from dataclasses import dataclass from typing import TypeVar, Generic, List, Optional # Query base @dataclass class Query: pass # Concrete queries @dataclass class GetOrderById(Query): order_id: str @dataclass class GetCustomerOrders(Query): customer_id: str status: Optional[str] = None page: int = 1 page_size: int = 20 @dataclass class SearchOrders(Query): query: str filters: dict = None sort_by: str = "created_at" sort_order: str = "desc" # Query result types @dataclass class OrderView: order_id: str customer_id: str status: str total_amount: float item_count: int created_at: datetime shipped_at: Optional[datetime] = None @dataclass class PaginatedResult(Generic[T]): items: List[T] total: int page: int page_size: int @property def total_pages(self) -> int: return (self.total + self.page_size - 1) // self.page_size # Query handler base T = TypeVar('T', bound=Query) R = TypeVar('R') class QueryHandler(ABC, Generic[T, R]): @abstractmethod async def handle(self, query: T) -> R: pass # Query bus class QueryBus: def __init__(self): self._handlers: Dict[Type[Query], QueryHandler] = {} def register(self, query_type: Type[Query], handler: QueryHandler): self._handlers[query_type] = handler async def dispatch(self, query: Query) -> Any: handler = self._handlers.get(type(query)) if not handler: raise ValueError(f"No handler for {type(query).__name__}") return await handler.handle(query) # Query handler implementation class GetOrderByIdHandler(QueryHandler[GetOrderById, Optional[OrderView]]): def __init__(self, read_db): self.read_db = read_db async def handle(self, query: GetOrderById) -> Optional[OrderView]: async with self.read_db.acquire() as conn: row = await conn.fetchrow( """ SELECT order_id, customer_id, status, total_amount, item_count, created_at, shipped_at FROM order_views WHERE order_id = $1 """, query.order_id ) if row: return OrderView(**dict(row)) return None class GetCustomerOrdersHandler(QueryHandler[GetCustomerOrders, PaginatedResult[OrderView]]): def __init__(self, read_db): self.read_db = read_db async def handle(self, query: GetCustomerOrders) -> PaginatedResult[OrderView]: async with self.read_db.acquire() as conn: # Build query with optional status filter where_clause = "customer_id = $1" params = [query.customer_id] if query.status: where_clause += " AND status = $2" params.append(query.status) # Get total count total = await conn.fetchval( f"SELECT COUNT(*) FROM order_views WHERE {where_clause}", *params ) # Get paginated results offset = (query.page - 1) * query.page_size rows = await conn.fetch( f""" SELECT order_id, customer_id, status, total_amount, item_count, created_at, shipped_at FROM order_views WHERE {where_clause} ORDER BY created_at DESC LIMIT ${len(params) + 1} OFFSET ${len(params) + 2} """, *params, query.page_size, offset ) return PaginatedResult( items=[OrderView(**dict(row)) for row in rows], total=total, page=query.page, page_size=query.page_size ) ``` ### Template 3: FastAPI CQRS Application ```python from fastapi import FastAPI, HTTPException, Depends from pydantic import BaseModel from typing import List, Optional app = FastAPI() # Request/Response models class CreateOrderRequest(BaseModel): customer_id: str items: List[dict] shipping_address: dict class OrderResponse(BaseModel): order_id: str customer_id: str status: str total_amount: float item_count: int created_at: datetime # Dependency injection def get_command_bus() -> CommandBus: return app.state.command_bus def get_query_bus() -> QueryBus: return app.state.query_bus # Command endpoints (POST, PUT, DELETE) @app.post("/orders", response_model=dict) async def create_order( request: CreateOrderRequest, command_bus: CommandBus = Depends(get_command_bus) ): command = CreateOrder( customer_id=request.customer_id, items=request.items, shipping_address=request.shipping_address ) order_id = await command_bus.dispatch(command) return {"order_id": order_id} @app.post("/orders/{order_id}/items") async def add_item( order_id: str, product_id: str, quantity: int, price: float, command_bus: CommandBus = Depends(get_command_bus) ): command = AddOrderItem( order_id=order_id, product_id=product_id, quantity=quantity, price=price ) await command_bus.dispatch(command) return {"status": "item_added"} @app.delete("/orders/{order_id}") async def cancel_order( order_id: str, reason: str, command_bus: CommandBus = Depends(get_command_bus) ): command = CancelOrder(order_id=order_id, reason=reason) await command_bus.dispatch(command) return {"status": "cancelled"} # Query endpoints (GET) @app.get("/orders/{order_id}", response_model=OrderResponse) async def get_order( order_id: str, query_bus: QueryBus = Depends(get_query_bus) ): query = GetOrderById(order_id=order_id) result = await query_bus.dispatch(query) if not result: raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="Order not found") return result @app.get("/customers/{customer_id}/orders") async def get_customer_orders( customer_id: str, status: Optional[str] = None, page: int = 1, page_size: int = 20, query_bus: QueryBus = Depends(get_query_bus) ): query = GetCustomerOrders( customer_id=customer_id, status=status, page=page, page_size=page_size ) return await query_bus.dispatch(query) @app.get("/orders/search") async def search_orders( q: str, sort_by: str = "created_at", query_bus: QueryBus = Depends(get_query_bus) ): query = SearchOrders(query=q, sort_by=sort_by) return await query_bus.dispatch(query) ``` ### Template 4: Read Model Synchronization ```python class ReadModelSynchronizer: """Keeps read models in sync with events.""" def __init__(self, event_store, read_db, projections: List[Projection]): self.event_store = event_store self.read_db = read_db self.projections = {p.name: p for p in projections} async def run(self): """Continuously sync read models.""" while True: for name, projection in self.projections.items(): await self._sync_projection(projection) await asyncio.sleep(0.1) async def _sync_projection(self, projection: Projection): checkpoint = await self._get_checkpoint(projection.name) events = await self.event_store.read_all( from_position=checkpoint, limit=100 ) for event in events: if event.event_type in projection.handles(): try: await projection.apply(event) except Exception as e: # Log error, possibly retry or skip logger.error(f"Projection error: {e}") continue await self._save_checkpoint(projection.name, event.global_position) async def rebuild_projection(self, projection_name: str): """Rebuild a projection from scratch.""" projection = self.projections[projection_name] # Clear existing data await projection.clear() # Reset checkpoint await self._save_checkpoint(projection_name, 0) # Rebuild while True: checkpoint = await self._get_checkpoint(projection_name) events = await self.event_store.read_all(checkpoint, 1000) if not events: break for event in events: if event.event_type in projection.handles(): await projection.apply(event) await self._save_checkpoint( projection_name, events[-1].global_position ) ``` ### Template 5: Eventual Consistency Handling ```python class ConsistentQueryHandler: """Query handler that can wait for consistency.""" def __init__(self, read_db, event_store): self.read_db = read_db self.event_store = event_store async def query_after_command( self, query: Query, expected_version: int, stream_id: str, timeout: float = 5.0 ): """ Execute query, ensuring read model is at expected version. Used for read-your-writes consistency. """ start_time = time.time() while time.time() - start_time < timeout: # Check if read model is caught up projection_version = await self._get_projection_version(stream_id) if projection_version >= expected_version: return await self.execute_query(query) # Wait a bit and retry await asyncio.sleep(0.1) # Timeout - return stale data with warning return { "data": await self.execute_query(query), "_warning": "Data may be stale" } async def _get_projection_version(self, stream_id: str) -> int: """Get the last processed event version for a stream.""" async with self.read_db.acquire() as conn: return await conn.fetchval( "SELECT last_event_version FROM projection_state WHERE stream_id = $1", stream_id ) or 0 ``` ## Best Practices ### Do's - **Separate command and query models** - Different needs - **Use eventual consistency** - Accept propagation delay - **Validate in command handlers** - Before state change - **Denormalize read models** - Optimize for queries - **Version your events** - For schema evolution ### Don'ts - **Don't query in commands** - Use only for writes - **Don't couple read/write schemas** - Independent evolution - **Don't over-engineer** - Start simple - **Don't ignore consistency SLAs** - Define acceptable lag ## Resources - [CQRS Pattern](https://martinfowler.com/bliki/CQRS.html) - [Microsoft CQRS Guidance](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/cqrs)
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

nft-standards

Implement NFT standards (ERC-721, ERC-1155) with proper metadata

coding
⭐1
# NFT Standards Master ERC-721 and ERC-1155 NFT standards, metadata best practices, and advanced NFT features. ## When to Use This Skill - Creating NFT collections (art, gaming, collectibles) - Implementing marketplace functionality - Building on-chain or off-chain metadata - Creating soulbound tokens (non-transferable) - Implementing royalties and revenue sharing - Developing dynamic/evolving NFTs ## ERC-721 (Non-Fungible Token Standard) ```solidity // SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT pragma solidity ^0.8.0; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC721/extensions/ERC721URIStorage.sol"; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC721/extensions/ERC721Enumerable.sol"; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol"; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Counters.sol"; contract MyNFT is ERC721URIStorage, ERC721Enumerable, Ownable { using Counters for Counters.Counter; Counters.Counter private _tokenIds; uint256 public constant MAX_SUPPLY = 10000; uint256 public constant MINT_PRICE = 0.08 ether; uint256 public constant MAX_PER_MINT = 20; constructor() ERC721("MyNFT", "MNFT") {} function mint(uint256 quantity) external payable { require(quantity > 0 && quantity <= MAX_PER_MINT, "Invalid quantity"); require(_tokenIds.current() + quantity <= MAX_SUPPLY, "Exceeds max supply"); require(msg.value >= MINT_PRICE * quantity, "Insufficient payment"); for (uint256 i = 0; i < quantity; i++) { _tokenIds.increment(); uint256 newTokenId = _tokenIds.current(); _safeMint(msg.sender, newTokenId); _setTokenURI(newTokenId, generateTokenURI(newTokenId)); } } function generateTokenURI(uint256 tokenId) internal pure returns (string memory) { // Return IPFS URI or on-chain metadata return string(abi.encodePacked("ipfs://QmHash/", Strings.toString(tokenId), ".json")); } // Required overrides function _beforeTokenTransfer( address from, address to, uint256 tokenId, uint256 batchSize ) internal override(ERC721, ERC721Enumerable) { super._beforeTokenTransfer(from, to, tokenId, batchSize); } function _burn(uint256 tokenId) internal override(ERC721, ERC721URIStorage) { super._burn(tokenId); } function tokenURI(uint256 tokenId) public view override(ERC721, ERC721URIStorage) returns (string memory) { return super.tokenURI(tokenId); } function supportsInterface(bytes4 interfaceId) public view override(ERC721, ERC721Enumerable) returns (bool) { return super.supportsInterface(interfaceId); } function withdraw() external onlyOwner { payable(owner()).transfer(address(this).balance); } } ``` ## ERC-1155 (Multi-Token Standard) ```solidity // SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT pragma solidity ^0.8.0; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC1155/ERC1155.sol"; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol"; contract GameItems is ERC1155, Ownable { uint256 public constant SWORD = 1; uint256 public constant SHIELD = 2; uint256 public constant POTION = 3; mapping(uint256 => uint256) public tokenSupply; mapping(uint256 => uint256) public maxSupply; constructor() ERC1155("ipfs://QmBaseHash/{id}.json") { maxSupply[SWORD] = 1000; maxSupply[SHIELD] = 500; maxSupply[POTION] = 10000; } function mint( address to, uint256 id, uint256 amount ) external onlyOwner { require(tokenSupply[id] + amount <= maxSupply[id], "Exceeds max supply"); _mint(to, id, amount, ""); tokenSupply[id] += amount; } function mintBatch( address to, uint256[] memory ids, uint256[] memory amounts ) external onlyOwner { for (uint256 i = 0; i < ids.length; i++) { require(tokenSupply[ids[i]] + amounts[i] <= maxSupply[ids[i]], "Exceeds max supply"); tokenSupply[ids[i]] += amounts[i]; } _mintBatch(to, ids, amounts, ""); } function burn( address from, uint256 id, uint256 amount ) external { require(from == msg.sender || isApprovedForAll(from, msg.sender), "Not authorized"); _burn(from, id, amount); tokenSupply[id] -= amount; } } ``` ## Metadata Standards ### Off-Chain Metadata (IPFS) ```json { "name": "NFT #1", "description": "Description of the NFT", "image": "ipfs://QmImageHash", "attributes": [ { "trait_type": "Background", "value": "Blue" }, { "trait_type": "Rarity", "value": "Legendary" }, { "trait_type": "Power", "value": 95, "display_type": "number", "max_value": 100 } ] } ``` ### On-Chain Metadata ```solidity contract OnChainNFT is ERC721 { struct Traits { uint8 background; uint8 body; uint8 head; uint8 rarity; } mapping(uint256 => Traits) public tokenTraits; function tokenURI(uint256 tokenId) public view override returns (string memory) { Traits memory traits = tokenTraits[tokenId]; string memory json = Base64.encode( bytes( string( abi.encodePacked( '{"name": "NFT #', Strings.toString(tokenId), '",', '"description": "On-chain NFT",', '"image": "data:image/svg+xml;base64,', generateSVG(traits), '",', '"attributes": [', '{"trait_type": "Background", "value": "', Strings.toString(traits.background), '"},', '{"trait_type": "Rarity", "value": "', getRarityName(traits.rarity), '"}', ']}' ) ) ) ); return string(abi.encodePacked("data:application/json;base64,", json)); } function generateSVG(Traits memory traits) internal pure returns (string memory) { // Generate SVG based on traits return "..."; } } ``` ## Royalties (EIP-2981) ```solidity import "@openzeppelin/contracts/interfaces/IERC2981.sol"; contract NFTWithRoyalties is ERC721, IERC2981 { address public royaltyRecipient; uint96 public royaltyFee = 500; // 5% constructor() ERC721("Royalty NFT", "RNFT") { royaltyRecipient = msg.sender; } function royaltyInfo(uint256 tokenId, uint256 salePrice) external view override returns (address receiver, uint256 royaltyAmount) { return (royaltyRecipient, (salePrice * royaltyFee) / 10000); } function setRoyalty(address recipient, uint96 fee) external onlyOwner { require(fee <= 1000, "Royalty fee too high"); // Max 10% royaltyRecipient = recipient; royaltyFee = fee; } function supportsInterface(bytes4 interfaceId) public view override(ERC721, IERC165) returns (bool) { return interfaceId == type(IERC2981).interfaceId || super.supportsInterface(interfaceId); } } ``` ## Soulbound Tokens (Non-Transferable) ```solidity contract SoulboundToken is ERC721 { constructor() ERC721("Soulbound", "SBT") {} function _beforeTokenTransfer( address from, address to, uint256 tokenId, uint256 batchSize ) internal virtual override { require(from == address(0) || to == address(0), "Token is soulbound"); super._beforeTokenTransfer(from, to, tokenId, batchSize); } function mint(address to) external { uint256 tokenId = totalSupply() + 1; _safeMint(to, tokenId); } // Burn is allowed (user can destroy their SBT) function burn(uint256 tokenId) external { require(ownerOf(tokenId) == msg.sender, "Not token owner"); _burn(tokenId); } } ``` ## Dynamic NFTs ```solidity contract DynamicNFT is ERC721 { struct TokenState { uint256 level; uint256 experience; uint256 lastUpdated; } mapping(uint256 => TokenState) public tokenStates; function gainExperience(uint256 tokenId, uint256 exp) external { require(ownerOf(tokenId) == msg.sender, "Not token owner"); TokenState storage state = tokenStates[tokenId]; state.experience += exp; // Level up logic if (state.experience >= state.level * 100) { state.level++; } state.lastUpdated = block.timestamp; } function tokenURI(uint256 tokenId) public view override returns (string memory) { TokenState memory state = tokenStates[tokenId]; // Generate metadata based on current state return generateMetadata(tokenId, state); } function generateMetadata(uint256 tokenId, TokenState memory state) internal pure returns (string memory) { // Dynamic metadata generation return ""; } } ``` ## Gas-Optimized Minting (ERC721A) ```solidity import "erc721a/contracts/ERC721A.sol"; contract OptimizedNFT is ERC721A { uint256 public constant MAX_SUPPLY = 10000; uint256 public constant MINT_PRICE = 0.05 ether; constructor() ERC721A("Optimized NFT", "ONFT") {} function mint(uint256 quantity) external payable { require(_totalMinted() + quantity <= MAX_SUPPLY, "Exceeds max supply"); require(msg.value >= MINT_PRICE * quantity, "Insufficient payment"); _mint(msg.sender, quantity); } function _baseURI() internal pure override returns (string memory) { return "ipfs://QmBaseHash/"; } } ``` ## Resources - **references/erc721.md**: ERC-721 specification details - **references/erc1155.md**: ERC-1155 multi-token standard - **references/metadata-standards.md**: Metadata best practices - **references/enumeration.md**: Token enumeration patterns - **assets/erc721-contract.sol**: Production ERC-721 template - **assets/erc1155-contract.sol**: Production ERC-1155 template - **assets/metadata-schema.json**: Standard metadata format - **assets/metadata-uploader.py**: IPFS upload utility ## Best Practices 1. **Use OpenZeppelin**: Battle-tested implementations 2. **Pin Metadata**: Use IPFS with pinning service 3. **Implement Royalties**: EIP-2981 for marketplace compatibility 4. **Gas Optimization**: Use ERC721A for batch minting 5. **Reveal Mechanism**: Placeholder β†’ reveal pattern 6. **Enumeration**: Support walletOfOwner for marketplaces 7. **Whitelist**: Merkle trees for efficient whitelisting ## Marketplace Integration - OpenSea: ERC-721/1155, metadata standards - LooksRare: Royalty enforcement - Rarible: Protocol fees, lazy minting - Blur: Gas-optimized trading
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

workflow-orchestration-patterns

Design durable workflows with Temporal for distributed systems.

coding
⭐1
# Workflow Orchestration Patterns Master workflow orchestration architecture with Temporal, covering fundamental design decisions, resilience patterns, and best practices for building reliable distributed systems. ## When to Use Workflow Orchestration ### Ideal Use Cases (Source: docs.temporal.io) - **Multi-step processes** spanning machines/services/databases - **Distributed transactions** requiring all-or-nothing semantics - **Long-running workflows** (hours to years) with automatic state persistence - **Failure recovery** that must resume from last successful step - **Business processes**: bookings, orders, campaigns, approvals - **Entity lifecycle management**: inventory tracking, account management, cart workflows - **Infrastructure automation**: CI/CD pipelines, provisioning, deployments - **Human-in-the-loop** systems requiring timeouts and escalations ### When NOT to Use - Simple CRUD operations (use direct API calls) - Pure data processing pipelines (use Airflow, batch processing) - Stateless request/response (use standard APIs) - Real-time streaming (use Kafka, event processors) ## Critical Design Decision: Workflows vs Activities **The Fundamental Rule** (Source: temporal.io/blog/workflow-engine-principles): - **Workflows** = Orchestration logic and decision-making - **Activities** = External interactions (APIs, databases, network calls) ### Workflows (Orchestration) **Characteristics:** - Contain business logic and coordination - **MUST be deterministic** (same inputs β†’ same outputs) - **Cannot** perform direct external calls - State automatically preserved across failures - Can run for years despite infrastructure failures **Example workflow tasks:** - Decide which steps to execute - Handle compensation logic - Manage timeouts and retries - Coordinate child workflows ### Activities (External Interactions) **Characteristics:** - Handle all external system interactions - Can be non-deterministic (API calls, DB writes) - Include built-in timeouts and retry logic - **Must be idempotent** (calling N times = calling once) - Short-lived (seconds to minutes typically) **Example activity tasks:** - Call payment gateway API - Write to database - Send emails or notifications - Query external services ### Design Decision Framework ``` Does it touch external systems? β†’ Activity Is it orchestration/decision logic? β†’ Workflow ``` ## Core Workflow Patterns ### 1. Saga Pattern with Compensation **Purpose**: Implement distributed transactions with rollback capability **Pattern** (Source: temporal.io/blog/compensating-actions-part-of-a-complete-breakfast-with-sagas): ``` For each step: 1. Register compensation BEFORE executing 2. Execute the step (via activity) 3. On failure, run all compensations in reverse order (LIFO) ``` **Example: Payment Workflow** 1. Reserve inventory (compensation: release inventory) 2. Charge payment (compensation: refund payment) 3. Fulfill order (compensation: cancel fulfillment) **Critical Requirements:** - Compensations must be idempotent - Register compensation BEFORE executing step - Run compensations in reverse order - Handle partial failures gracefully ### 2. Entity Workflows (Actor Model) **Purpose**: Long-lived workflow representing single entity instance **Pattern** (Source: docs.temporal.io/evaluate/use-cases-design-patterns): - One workflow execution = one entity (cart, account, inventory item) - Workflow persists for entity lifetime - Receives signals for state changes - Supports queries for current state **Example Use Cases:** - Shopping cart (add items, checkout, expiration) - Bank account (deposits, withdrawals, balance checks) - Product inventory (stock updates, reservations) **Benefits:** - Encapsulates entity behavior - Guarantees consistency per entity - Natural event sourcing ### 3. Fan-Out/Fan-In (Parallel Execution) **Purpose**: Execute multiple tasks in parallel, aggregate results **Pattern:** - Spawn child workflows or parallel activities - Wait for all to complete - Aggregate results - Handle partial failures **Scaling Rule** (Source: temporal.io/blog/workflow-engine-principles): - Don't scale individual workflows - For 1M tasks: spawn 1K child workflows Γ— 1K tasks each - Keep each workflow bounded ### 4. Async Callback Pattern **Purpose**: Wait for external event or human approval **Pattern:** - Workflow sends request and waits for signal - External system processes asynchronously - Sends signal to resume workflow - Workflow continues with response **Use Cases:** - Human approval workflows - Webhook callbacks - Long-running external processes ## State Management and Determinism ### Automatic State Preservation **How Temporal Works** (Source: docs.temporal.io/workflows): - Complete program state preserved automatically - Event History records every command and event - Seamless recovery from crashes - Applications restore pre-failure state ### Determinism Constraints **Workflows Execute as State Machines**: - Replay behavior must be consistent - Same inputs β†’ identical outputs every time **Prohibited in Workflows** (Source: docs.temporal.io/workflows): - ❌ Threading, locks, synchronization primitives - ❌ Random number generation (`random()`) - ❌ Global state or static variables - ❌ System time (`datetime.now()`) - ❌ Direct file I/O or network calls - ❌ Non-deterministic libraries **Allowed in Workflows**: - βœ… `workflow.now()` (deterministic time) - βœ… `workflow.random()` (deterministic random) - βœ… Pure functions and calculations - βœ… Calling activities (non-deterministic operations) ### Versioning Strategies **Challenge**: Changing workflow code while old executions still running **Solutions**: 1. **Versioning API**: Use `workflow.get_version()` for safe changes 2. **New Workflow Type**: Create new workflow, route new executions to it 3. **Backward Compatibility**: Ensure old events replay correctly ## Resilience and Error Handling ### Retry Policies **Default Behavior**: Temporal retries activities forever **Configure Retry**: - Initial retry interval - Backoff coefficient (exponential backoff) - Maximum interval (cap retry delay) - Maximum attempts (eventually fail) **Non-Retryable Errors**: - Invalid input (validation failures) - Business rule violations - Permanent failures (resource not found) ### Idempotency Requirements **Why Critical** (Source: docs.temporal.io/activities): - Activities may execute multiple times - Network failures trigger retries - Duplicate execution must be safe **Implementation Strategies**: - Idempotency keys (deduplication) - Check-then-act with unique constraints - Upsert operations instead of insert - Track processed request IDs ### Activity Heartbeats **Purpose**: Detect stalled long-running activities **Pattern**: - Activity sends periodic heartbeat - Includes progress information - Timeout if no heartbeat received - Enables progress-based retry ## Best Practices ### Workflow Design 1. **Keep workflows focused** - Single responsibility per workflow 2. **Small workflows** - Use child workflows for scalability 3. **Clear boundaries** - Workflow orchestrates, activities execute 4. **Test locally** - Use time-skipping test environment ### Activity Design 1. **Idempotent operations** - Safe to retry 2. **Short-lived** - Seconds to minutes, not hours 3. **Timeout configuration** - Always set timeouts 4. **Heartbeat for long tasks** - Report progress 5. **Error handling** - Distinguish retryable vs non-retryable ### Common Pitfalls **Workflow Violations**: - Using `datetime.now()` instead of `workflow.now()` - Threading or async operations in workflow code - Calling external APIs directly from workflow - Non-deterministic logic in workflows **Activity Mistakes**: - Non-idempotent operations (can't handle retries) - Missing timeouts (activities run forever) - No error classification (retry validation errors) - Ignoring payload limits (2MB per argument) ### Operational Considerations **Monitoring**: - Workflow execution duration - Activity failure rates - Retry attempts and backoff - Pending workflow counts **Scalability**: - Horizontal scaling with workers - Task queue partitioning - Child workflow decomposition - Activity batching when appropriate ## Additional Resources **Official Documentation**: - Temporal Core Concepts: docs.temporal.io/workflows - Workflow Patterns: docs.temporal.io/evaluate/use-cases-design-patterns - Best Practices: docs.temporal.io/develop/best-practices - Saga Pattern: temporal.io/blog/saga-pattern-made-easy **Key Principles**: 1. Workflows = orchestration, Activities = external calls 2. Determinism is non-negotiable for workflows 3. Idempotency is critical for activities 4. State preservation is automatic 5. Design for failure and recovery
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

temporal-python-testing

Test Temporal workflows with pytest, time-skipping, and mocking

coding
⭐1
# Temporal Python Testing Strategies Comprehensive testing approaches for Temporal workflows using pytest, progressive disclosure resources for specific testing scenarios. ## When to Use This Skill - **Unit testing workflows** - Fast tests with time-skipping - **Integration testing** - Workflows with mocked activities - **Replay testing** - Validate determinism against production histories - **Local development** - Set up Temporal server and pytest - **CI/CD integration** - Automated testing pipelines - **Coverage strategies** - Achieve β‰₯80% test coverage ## Testing Philosophy **Recommended Approach** (Source: docs.temporal.io/develop/python/testing-suite): - Write majority as integration tests - Use pytest with async fixtures - Time-skipping enables fast feedback (month-long workflows β†’ seconds) - Mock activities to isolate workflow logic - Validate determinism with replay testing **Three Test Types**: 1. **Unit**: Workflows with time-skipping, activities with ActivityEnvironment 2. **Integration**: Workers with mocked activities 3. **End-to-end**: Full Temporal server with real activities (use sparingly) ## Available Resources This skill provides detailed guidance through progressive disclosure. Load specific resources based on your testing needs: ### Unit Testing Resources **File**: `resources/unit-testing.md` **When to load**: Testing individual workflows or activities in isolation **Contains**: - WorkflowEnvironment with time-skipping - ActivityEnvironment for activity testing - Fast execution of long-running workflows - Manual time advancement patterns - pytest fixtures and patterns ### Integration Testing Resources **File**: `resources/integration-testing.md` **When to load**: Testing workflows with mocked external dependencies **Contains**: - Activity mocking strategies - Error injection patterns - Multi-activity workflow testing - Signal and query testing - Coverage strategies ### Replay Testing Resources **File**: `resources/replay-testing.md` **When to load**: Validating determinism or deploying workflow changes **Contains**: - Determinism validation - Production history replay - CI/CD integration patterns - Version compatibility testing ### Local Development Resources **File**: `resources/local-setup.md` **When to load**: Setting up development environment **Contains**: - Docker Compose configuration - pytest setup and configuration - Coverage tool integration - Development workflow ## Quick Start Guide ### Basic Workflow Test ```python import pytest from temporalio.testing import WorkflowEnvironment from temporalio.worker import Worker @pytest.fixture async def workflow_env(): env = await WorkflowEnvironment.start_time_skipping() yield env await env.shutdown() @pytest.mark.asyncio async def test_workflow(workflow_env): async with Worker( workflow_env.client, task_queue="test-queue", workflows=[YourWorkflow], activities=[your_activity], ): result = await workflow_env.client.execute_workflow( YourWorkflow.run, args, id="test-wf-id", task_queue="test-queue", ) assert result == expected ``` ### Basic Activity Test ```python from temporalio.testing import ActivityEnvironment async def test_activity(): env = ActivityEnvironment() result = await env.run(your_activity, "test-input") assert result == expected_output ``` ## Coverage Targets **Recommended Coverage** (Source: docs.temporal.io best practices): - **Workflows**: β‰₯80% logic coverage - **Activities**: β‰₯80% logic coverage - **Integration**: Critical paths with mocked activities - **Replay**: All workflow versions before deployment ## Key Testing Principles 1. **Time-Skipping** - Month-long workflows test in seconds 2. **Mock Activities** - Isolate workflow logic from external dependencies 3. **Replay Testing** - Validate determinism before deployment 4. **High Coverage** - β‰₯80% target for production workflows 5. **Fast Feedback** - Unit tests run in milliseconds ## How to Use Resources **Load specific resource when needed**: - "Show me unit testing patterns" β†’ Load `resources/unit-testing.md` - "How do I mock activities?" β†’ Load `resources/integration-testing.md` - "Setup local Temporal server" β†’ Load `resources/local-setup.md` - "Validate determinism" β†’ Load `resources/replay-testing.md` ## Additional References - Python SDK Testing: docs.temporal.io/develop/python/testing-suite - Testing Patterns: github.com/temporalio/temporal/blob/main/docs/development/testing.md - Python Samples: github.com/temporalio/samples-python
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

architecture-patterns

Implement proven backend architecture patterns including Clean

coding
⭐1
# Architecture Patterns Master proven backend architecture patterns including Clean Architecture, Hexagonal Architecture, and Domain-Driven Design to build maintainable, testable, and scalable systems. ## When to Use This Skill - Designing new backend systems from scratch - Refactoring monolithic applications for better maintainability - Establishing architecture standards for your team - Migrating from tightly coupled to loosely coupled architectures - Implementing domain-driven design principles - Creating testable and mockable codebases - Planning microservices decomposition ## Core Concepts ### 1. Clean Architecture (Uncle Bob) **Layers (dependency flows inward):** - **Entities**: Core business models - **Use Cases**: Application business rules - **Interface Adapters**: Controllers, presenters, gateways - **Frameworks & Drivers**: UI, database, external services **Key Principles:** - Dependencies point inward - Inner layers know nothing about outer layers - Business logic independent of frameworks - Testable without UI, database, or external services ### 2. Hexagonal Architecture (Ports and Adapters) **Components:** - **Domain Core**: Business logic - **Ports**: Interfaces defining interactions - **Adapters**: Implementations of ports (database, REST, message queue) **Benefits:** - Swap implementations easily (mock for testing) - Technology-agnostic core - Clear separation of concerns ### 3. Domain-Driven Design (DDD) **Strategic Patterns:** - **Bounded Contexts**: Separate models for different domains - **Context Mapping**: How contexts relate - **Ubiquitous Language**: Shared terminology **Tactical Patterns:** - **Entities**: Objects with identity - **Value Objects**: Immutable objects defined by attributes - **Aggregates**: Consistency boundaries - **Repositories**: Data access abstraction - **Domain Events**: Things that happened ## Clean Architecture Pattern ### Directory Structure ``` app/ β”œβ”€β”€ domain/ # Entities & business rules β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ entities/ β”‚ β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ user.py β”‚ β”‚ └── order.py β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ value_objects/ β”‚ β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ email.py β”‚ β”‚ └── money.py β”‚ └── interfaces/ # Abstract interfaces β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ user_repository.py β”‚ └── payment_gateway.py β”œβ”€β”€ use_cases/ # Application business rules β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ create_user.py β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ process_order.py β”‚ └── send_notification.py β”œβ”€β”€ adapters/ # Interface implementations β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ repositories/ β”‚ β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ postgres_user_repository.py β”‚ β”‚ └── redis_cache_repository.py β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ controllers/ β”‚ β”‚ └── user_controller.py β”‚ └── gateways/ β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ stripe_payment_gateway.py β”‚ └── sendgrid_email_gateway.py └── infrastructure/ # Framework & external concerns β”œβ”€β”€ database.py β”œβ”€β”€ config.py └── logging.py ``` ### Implementation Example ```python # domain/entities/user.py from dataclasses import dataclass from datetime import datetime from typing import Optional @dataclass class User: """Core user entity - no framework dependencies.""" id: str email: str name: str created_at: datetime is_active: bool = True def deactivate(self): """Business rule: deactivating user.""" self.is_active = False def can_place_order(self) -> bool: """Business rule: active users can order.""" return self.is_active # domain/interfaces/user_repository.py from abc import ABC, abstractmethod from typing import Optional, List from domain.entities.user import User class IUserRepository(ABC): """Port: defines contract, no implementation.""" @abstractmethod async def find_by_id(self, user_id: str) -> Optional[User]: pass @abstractmethod async def find_by_email(self, email: str) -> Optional[User]: pass @abstractmethod async def save(self, user: User) -> User: pass @abstractmethod async def delete(self, user_id: str) -> bool: pass # use_cases/create_user.py from domain.entities.user import User from domain.interfaces.user_repository import IUserRepository from dataclasses import dataclass from datetime import datetime import uuid @dataclass class CreateUserRequest: email: str name: str @dataclass class CreateUserResponse: user: User success: bool error: Optional[str] = None class CreateUserUseCase: """Use case: orchestrates business logic.""" def __init__(self, user_repository: IUserRepository): self.user_repository = user_repository async def execute(self, request: CreateUserRequest) -> CreateUserResponse: # Business validation existing = await self.user_repository.find_by_email(request.email) if existing: return CreateUserResponse( user=None, success=False, error="Email already exists" ) # Create entity user = User( id=str(uuid.uuid4()), email=request.email, name=request.name, created_at=datetime.now(), is_active=True ) # Persist saved_user = await self.user_repository.save(user) return CreateUserResponse( user=saved_user, success=True ) # adapters/repositories/postgres_user_repository.py from domain.interfaces.user_repository import IUserRepository from domain.entities.user import User from typing import Optional import asyncpg class PostgresUserRepository(IUserRepository): """Adapter: PostgreSQL implementation.""" def __init__(self, pool: asyncpg.Pool): self.pool = pool async def find_by_id(self, user_id: str) -> Optional[User]: async with self.pool.acquire() as conn: row = await conn.fetchrow( "SELECT * FROM users WHERE id = $1", user_id ) return self._to_entity(row) if row else None async def find_by_email(self, email: str) -> Optional[User]: async with self.pool.acquire() as conn: row = await conn.fetchrow( "SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = $1", email ) return self._to_entity(row) if row else None async def save(self, user: User) -> User: async with self.pool.acquire() as conn: await conn.execute( """ INSERT INTO users (id, email, name, created_at, is_active) VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4, $5) ON CONFLICT (id) DO UPDATE SET email = $2, name = $3, is_active = $5 """, user.id, user.email, user.name, user.created_at, user.is_active ) return user async def delete(self, user_id: str) -> bool: async with self.pool.acquire() as conn: result = await conn.execute( "DELETE FROM users WHERE id = $1", user_id ) return result == "DELETE 1" def _to_entity(self, row) -> User: """Map database row to entity.""" return User( id=row["id"], email=row["email"], name=row["name"], created_at=row["created_at"], is_active=row["is_active"] ) # adapters/controllers/user_controller.py from fastapi import APIRouter, Depends, HTTPException from use_cases.create_user import CreateUserUseCase, CreateUserRequest from pydantic import BaseModel router = APIRouter() class CreateUserDTO(BaseModel): email: str name: str @router.post("/users") async def create_user( dto: CreateUserDTO, use_case: CreateUserUseCase = Depends(get_create_user_use_case) ): """Controller: handles HTTP concerns only.""" request = CreateUserRequest(email=dto.email, name=dto.name) response = await use_case.execute(request) if not response.success: raise HTTPException(status_code=400, detail=response.error) return {"user": response.user} ``` ## Hexagonal Architecture Pattern ```python # Core domain (hexagon center) class OrderService: """Domain service - no infrastructure dependencies.""" def __init__( self, order_repository: OrderRepositoryPort, payment_gateway: PaymentGatewayPort, notification_service: NotificationPort ): self.orders = order_repository self.payments = payment_gateway self.notifications = notification_service async def place_order(self, order: Order) -> OrderResult: # Business logic if not order.is_valid(): return OrderResult(success=False, error="Invalid order") # Use ports (interfaces) payment = await self.payments.charge( amount=order.total, customer=order.customer_id ) if not payment.success: return OrderResult(success=False, error="Payment failed") order.mark_as_paid() saved_order = await self.orders.save(order) await self.notifications.send( to=order.customer_email, subject="Order confirmed", body=f"Order {order.id} confirmed" ) return OrderResult(success=True, order=saved_order) # Ports (interfaces) class OrderRepositoryPort(ABC): @abstractmethod async def save(self, order: Order) -> Order: pass class PaymentGatewayPort(ABC): @abstractmethod async def charge(self, amount: Money, customer: str) -> PaymentResult: pass class NotificationPort(ABC): @abstractmethod async def send(self, to: str, subject: str, body: str): pass # Adapters (implementations) class StripePaymentAdapter(PaymentGatewayPort): """Primary adapter: connects to Stripe API.""" def __init__(self, api_key: str): self.stripe = stripe self.stripe.api_key = api_key async def charge(self, amount: Money, customer: str) -> PaymentResult: try: charge = self.stripe.Charge.create( amount=amount.cents, currency=amount.currency, customer=customer ) return PaymentResult(success=True, transaction_id=charge.id) except stripe.error.CardError as e: return PaymentResult(success=False, error=str(e)) class MockPaymentAdapter(PaymentGatewayPort): """Test adapter: no external dependencies.""" async def charge(self, amount: Money, customer: str) -> PaymentResult: return PaymentResult(success=True, transaction_id="mock-123") ``` ## Domain-Driven Design Pattern ```python # Value Objects (immutable) from dataclasses import dataclass from typing import Optional @dataclass(frozen=True) class Email: """Value object: validated email.""" value: str def __post_init__(self): if "@" not in self.value: raise ValueError("Invalid email") @dataclass(frozen=True) class Money: """Value object: amount with currency.""" amount: int # cents currency: str def add(self, other: "Money") -> "Money": if self.currency != other.currency: raise ValueError("Currency mismatch") return Money(self.amount + other.amount, self.currency) # Entities (with identity) class Order: """Entity: has identity, mutable state.""" def __init__(self, id: str, customer: Customer): self.id = id self.customer = customer self.items: List[OrderItem] = [] self.status = OrderStatus.PENDING self._events: List[DomainEvent] = [] def add_item(self, product: Product, quantity: int): """Business logic in entity.""" item = OrderItem(product, quantity) self.items.append(item) self._events.append(ItemAddedEvent(self.id, item)) def total(self) -> Money: """Calculated property.""" return sum(item.subtotal() for item in self.items) def submit(self): """State transition with business rules.""" if not self.items: raise ValueError("Cannot submit empty order") if self.status != OrderStatus.PENDING: raise ValueError("Order already submitted") self.status = OrderStatus.SUBMITTED self._events.append(OrderSubmittedEvent(self.id)) # Aggregates (consistency boundary) class Customer: """Aggregate root: controls access to entities.""" def __init__(self, id: str, email: Email): self.id = id self.email = email self._addresses: List[Address] = [] self._orders: List[str] = [] # Order IDs, not full objects def add_address(self, address: Address): """Aggregate enforces invariants.""" if len(self._addresses) >= 5: raise ValueError("Maximum 5 addresses allowed") self._addresses.append(address) @property def primary_address(self) -> Optional[Address]: return next((a for a in self._addresses if a.is_primary), None) # Domain Events @dataclass class OrderSubmittedEvent: order_id: str occurred_at: datetime = field(default_factory=datetime.now) # Repository (aggregate persistence) class OrderRepository: """Repository: persist/retrieve aggregates.""" async def find_by_id(self, order_id: str) -> Optional[Order]: """Reconstitute aggregate from storage.""" pass async def save(self, order: Order): """Persist aggregate and publish events.""" await self._persist(order) await self._publish_events(order._events) order._events.clear() ``` ## Resources - **references/clean-architecture-guide.md**: Detailed layer breakdown - **references/hexagonal-architecture-guide.md**: Ports and adapters patterns - **references/ddd-tactical-patterns.md**: Entities, value objects, aggregates - **assets/clean-architecture-template/**: Complete project structure - **assets/ddd-examples/**: Domain modeling examples ## Best Practices 1. **Dependency Rule**: Dependencies always point inward 2. **Interface Segregation**: Small, focused interfaces 3. **Business Logic in Domain**: Keep frameworks out of core 4. **Test Independence**: Core testable without infrastructure 5. **Bounded Contexts**: Clear domain boundaries 6. **Ubiquitous Language**: Consistent terminology 7. **Thin Controllers**: Delegate to use cases 8. **Rich Domain Models**: Behavior with data ## Common Pitfalls - **Anemic Domain**: Entities with only data, no behavior - **Framework Coupling**: Business logic depends on frameworks - **Fat Controllers**: Business logic in controllers - **Repository Leakage**: Exposing ORM objects - **Missing Abstractions**: Concrete dependencies in core - **Over-Engineering**: Clean architecture for simple CRUD
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

team-composition-patterns

Design optimal agent team compositions with sizing heuristics,

coding
⭐1
# Team Composition Patterns Best practices for composing multi-agent teams, selecting team sizes, choosing agent types, and configuring display modes for Claude Code's Agent Teams feature. ## When to Use This Skill - Deciding how many teammates to spawn for a task - Choosing between preset team configurations - Selecting the right agent type (subagent_type) for each role - Configuring teammate display modes (tmux, iTerm2, in-process) - Building custom team compositions for non-standard workflows ## Team Sizing Heuristics | Complexity | Team Size | When to Use | | ------------ | --------- | ----------------------------------------------------------- | | Simple | 1-2 | Single-dimension review, isolated bug, small feature | | Moderate | 2-3 | Multi-file changes, 2-3 concerns, medium features | | Complex | 3-4 | Cross-cutting concerns, large features, deep debugging | | Very Complex | 4-5 | Full-stack features, comprehensive reviews, systemic issues | **Rule of thumb**: Start with the smallest team that covers all required dimensions. Adding teammates increases coordination overhead. ## Preset Team Compositions ### Review Team - **Size**: 3 reviewers - **Agents**: 3x `team-reviewer` - **Default dimensions**: security, performance, architecture - **Use when**: Code changes need multi-dimensional quality assessment ### Debug Team - **Size**: 3 investigators - **Agents**: 3x `team-debugger` - **Default hypotheses**: 3 competing hypotheses - **Use when**: Bug has multiple plausible root causes ### Feature Team - **Size**: 3 (1 lead + 2 implementers) - **Agents**: 1x `team-lead` + 2x `team-implementer` - **Use when**: Feature can be decomposed into parallel work streams ### Fullstack Team - **Size**: 4 (1 lead + 3 implementers) - **Agents**: 1x `team-lead` + 1x frontend `team-implementer` + 1x backend `team-implementer` + 1x test `team-implementer` - **Use when**: Feature spans frontend, backend, and test layers ### Research Team - **Size**: 3 researchers - **Agents**: 3x `general-purpose` - **Default areas**: Each assigned a different research question, module, or topic - **Capabilities**: Codebase search (Grep, Glob, Read), web search (WebSearch, WebFetch) - **Use when**: Need to understand a codebase, research libraries, compare approaches, or gather information from code and web sources in parallel ### Security Team - **Size**: 4 reviewers - **Agents**: 4x `team-reviewer` - **Default dimensions**: OWASP/vulnerabilities, auth/access control, dependencies/supply chain, secrets/configuration - **Use when**: Comprehensive security audit covering multiple attack surfaces ### Migration Team - **Size**: 4 (1 lead + 2 implementers + 1 reviewer) - **Agents**: 1x `team-lead` + 2x `team-implementer` + 1x `team-reviewer` - **Use when**: Large codebase migration (framework upgrade, language port, API version bump) requiring parallel work with correctness verification ## Agent Type Selection When spawning teammates with the Task tool, choose `subagent_type` based on what tools the teammate needs: | Agent Type | Tools Available | Use For | | ------------------------------ | ----------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- | | `general-purpose` | All tools (Read, Write, Edit, Bash, etc.) | Implementation, debugging, any task requiring file changes | | `Explore` | Read-only tools (Read, Grep, Glob) | Research, code exploration, analysis | | `Plan` | Read-only tools | Architecture planning, task decomposition | | `agent-teams:team-reviewer` | All tools | Code review with structured findings | | `agent-teams:team-debugger` | All tools | Hypothesis-driven investigation | | `agent-teams:team-implementer` | All tools | Building features within file ownership boundaries | | `agent-teams:team-lead` | All tools | Team orchestration and coordination | **Key distinction**: Read-only agents (Explore, Plan) cannot modify files. Never assign implementation tasks to read-only agents. ## Display Mode Configuration Configure in `~/.claude/settings.json`: ```json { "teammateMode": "tmux" } ``` | Mode | Behavior | Best For | | -------------- | ------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------- | | `"tmux"` | Each teammate in a tmux pane | Development workflows, monitoring multiple agents | | `"iterm2"` | Each teammate in an iTerm2 tab | macOS users who prefer iTerm2 | | `"in-process"` | All teammates in same process | Simple tasks, CI/CD environments | ## Custom Team Guidelines When building custom teams: 1. **Every team needs a coordinator** β€” Either designate a `team-lead` or have the user coordinate directly 2. **Match roles to agent types** β€” Use specialized agents (reviewer, debugger, implementer) when available 3. **Avoid duplicate roles** β€” Two agents doing the same thing wastes resources 4. **Define boundaries upfront** β€” Each teammate needs clear ownership of files or responsibilities 5. **Keep it small** β€” 2-4 teammates is the sweet spot; 5+ requires significant coordination overhead
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

saga-orchestration

Implement saga patterns for distributed transactions and

coding
⭐1
# Saga Orchestration Patterns for managing distributed transactions and long-running business processes. ## When to Use This Skill - Coordinating multi-service transactions - Implementing compensating transactions - Managing long-running business workflows - Handling failures in distributed systems - Building order fulfillment processes - Implementing approval workflows ## Core Concepts ### 1. Saga Types ``` Choreography Orchestration β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚Svc A│─►│Svc B│─►│Svc Cβ”‚ β”‚ Orchestratorβ”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β–Ό β–Ό β–Ό β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”Όβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” Event Event Event β–Ό β–Ό β–Ό β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚Svc1β”‚β”‚Svc2β”‚β”‚Svc3β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ ``` ### 2. Saga Execution States | State | Description | | ---------------- | ------------------------------ | | **Started** | Saga initiated | | **Pending** | Waiting for step completion | | **Compensating** | Rolling back due to failure | | **Completed** | All steps succeeded | | **Failed** | Saga failed after compensation | ## Templates ### Template 1: Saga Orchestrator Base ```python from abc import ABC, abstractmethod from dataclasses import dataclass, field from enum import Enum from typing import List, Dict, Any, Optional from datetime import datetime import uuid class SagaState(Enum): STARTED = "started" PENDING = "pending" COMPENSATING = "compensating" COMPLETED = "completed" FAILED = "failed" @dataclass class SagaStep: name: str action: str compensation: str status: str = "pending" result: Optional[Dict] = None error: Optional[str] = None executed_at: Optional[datetime] = None compensated_at: Optional[datetime] = None @dataclass class Saga: saga_id: str saga_type: str state: SagaState data: Dict[str, Any] steps: List[SagaStep] current_step: int = 0 created_at: datetime = field(default_factory=datetime.utcnow) updated_at: datetime = field(default_factory=datetime.utcnow) class SagaOrchestrator(ABC): """Base class for saga orchestrators.""" def __init__(self, saga_store, event_publisher): self.saga_store = saga_store self.event_publisher = event_publisher @abstractmethod def define_steps(self, data: Dict) -> List[SagaStep]: """Define the saga steps.""" pass @property @abstractmethod def saga_type(self) -> str: """Unique saga type identifier.""" pass async def start(self, data: Dict) -> Saga: """Start a new saga.""" saga = Saga( saga_id=str(uuid.uuid4()), saga_type=self.saga_type, state=SagaState.STARTED, data=data, steps=self.define_steps(data) ) await self.saga_store.save(saga) await self._execute_next_step(saga) return saga async def handle_step_completed(self, saga_id: str, step_name: str, result: Dict): """Handle successful step completion.""" saga = await self.saga_store.get(saga_id) # Update step for step in saga.steps: if step.name == step_name: step.status = "completed" step.result = result step.executed_at = datetime.utcnow() break saga.current_step += 1 saga.updated_at = datetime.utcnow() # Check if saga is complete if saga.current_step >= len(saga.steps): saga.state = SagaState.COMPLETED await self.saga_store.save(saga) await self._on_saga_completed(saga) else: saga.state = SagaState.PENDING await self.saga_store.save(saga) await self._execute_next_step(saga) async def handle_step_failed(self, saga_id: str, step_name: str, error: str): """Handle step failure - start compensation.""" saga = await self.saga_store.get(saga_id) # Mark step as failed for step in saga.steps: if step.name == step_name: step.status = "failed" step.error = error break saga.state = SagaState.COMPENSATING saga.updated_at = datetime.utcnow() await self.saga_store.save(saga) # Start compensation from current step backwards await self._compensate(saga) async def _execute_next_step(self, saga: Saga): """Execute the next step in the saga.""" if saga.current_step >= len(saga.steps): return step = saga.steps[saga.current_step] step.status = "executing" await self.saga_store.save(saga) # Publish command to execute step await self.event_publisher.publish( step.action, { "saga_id": saga.saga_id, "step_name": step.name, **saga.data } ) async def _compensate(self, saga: Saga): """Execute compensation for completed steps.""" # Compensate in reverse order for i in range(saga.current_step - 1, -1, -1): step = saga.steps[i] if step.status == "completed": step.status = "compensating" await self.saga_store.save(saga) await self.event_publisher.publish( step.compensation, { "saga_id": saga.saga_id, "step_name": step.name, "original_result": step.result, **saga.data } ) async def handle_compensation_completed(self, saga_id: str, step_name: str): """Handle compensation completion.""" saga = await self.saga_store.get(saga_id) for step in saga.steps: if step.name == step_name: step.status = "compensated" step.compensated_at = datetime.utcnow() break # Check if all compensations complete all_compensated = all( s.status in ("compensated", "pending", "failed") for s in saga.steps ) if all_compensated: saga.state = SagaState.FAILED await self._on_saga_failed(saga) await self.saga_store.save(saga) async def _on_saga_completed(self, saga: Saga): """Called when saga completes successfully.""" await self.event_publisher.publish( f"{self.saga_type}Completed", {"saga_id": saga.saga_id, **saga.data} ) async def _on_saga_failed(self, saga: Saga): """Called when saga fails after compensation.""" await self.event_publisher.publish( f"{self.saga_type}Failed", {"saga_id": saga.saga_id, "error": "Saga failed", **saga.data} ) ``` ### Template 2: Order Fulfillment Saga ```python class OrderFulfillmentSaga(SagaOrchestrator): """Orchestrates order fulfillment across services.""" @property def saga_type(self) -> str: return "OrderFulfillment" def define_steps(self, data: Dict) -> List[SagaStep]: return [ SagaStep( name="reserve_inventory", action="InventoryService.ReserveItems", compensation="InventoryService.ReleaseReservation" ), SagaStep( name="process_payment", action="PaymentService.ProcessPayment", compensation="PaymentService.RefundPayment" ), SagaStep( name="create_shipment", action="ShippingService.CreateShipment", compensation="ShippingService.CancelShipment" ), SagaStep( name="send_confirmation", action="NotificationService.SendOrderConfirmation", compensation="NotificationService.SendCancellationNotice" ) ] # Usage async def create_order(order_data: Dict): saga = OrderFulfillmentSaga(saga_store, event_publisher) return await saga.start({ "order_id": order_data["order_id"], "customer_id": order_data["customer_id"], "items": order_data["items"], "payment_method": order_data["payment_method"], "shipping_address": order_data["shipping_address"] }) # Event handlers in each service class InventoryService: async def handle_reserve_items(self, command: Dict): try: # Reserve inventory reservation = await self.reserve( command["items"], command["order_id"] ) # Report success await self.event_publisher.publish( "SagaStepCompleted", { "saga_id": command["saga_id"], "step_name": "reserve_inventory", "result": {"reservation_id": reservation.id} } ) except InsufficientInventoryError as e: await self.event_publisher.publish( "SagaStepFailed", { "saga_id": command["saga_id"], "step_name": "reserve_inventory", "error": str(e) } ) async def handle_release_reservation(self, command: Dict): # Compensating action await self.release_reservation( command["original_result"]["reservation_id"] ) await self.event_publisher.publish( "SagaCompensationCompleted", { "saga_id": command["saga_id"], "step_name": "reserve_inventory" } ) ``` ### Template 3: Choreography-Based Saga ```python from dataclasses import dataclass from typing import Dict, Any import asyncio @dataclass class SagaContext: """Passed through choreographed saga events.""" saga_id: str step: int data: Dict[str, Any] completed_steps: list class OrderChoreographySaga: """Choreography-based saga using events.""" def __init__(self, event_bus): self.event_bus = event_bus self._register_handlers() def _register_handlers(self): self.event_bus.subscribe("OrderCreated", self._on_order_created) self.event_bus.subscribe("InventoryReserved", self._on_inventory_reserved) self.event_bus.subscribe("PaymentProcessed", self._on_payment_processed) self.event_bus.subscribe("ShipmentCreated", self._on_shipment_created) # Compensation handlers self.event_bus.subscribe("PaymentFailed", self._on_payment_failed) self.event_bus.subscribe("ShipmentFailed", self._on_shipment_failed) async def _on_order_created(self, event: Dict): """Step 1: Order created, reserve inventory.""" await self.event_bus.publish("ReserveInventory", { "saga_id": event["order_id"], "order_id": event["order_id"], "items": event["items"] }) async def _on_inventory_reserved(self, event: Dict): """Step 2: Inventory reserved, process payment.""" await self.event_bus.publish("ProcessPayment", { "saga_id": event["saga_id"], "order_id": event["order_id"], "amount": event["total_amount"], "reservation_id": event["reservation_id"] }) async def _on_payment_processed(self, event: Dict): """Step 3: Payment done, create shipment.""" await self.event_bus.publish("CreateShipment", { "saga_id": event["saga_id"], "order_id": event["order_id"], "payment_id": event["payment_id"] }) async def _on_shipment_created(self, event: Dict): """Step 4: Complete - send confirmation.""" await self.event_bus.publish("OrderFulfilled", { "saga_id": event["saga_id"], "order_id": event["order_id"], "tracking_number": event["tracking_number"] }) # Compensation handlers async def _on_payment_failed(self, event: Dict): """Payment failed - release inventory.""" await self.event_bus.publish("ReleaseInventory", { "saga_id": event["saga_id"], "reservation_id": event["reservation_id"] }) await self.event_bus.publish("OrderFailed", { "order_id": event["order_id"], "reason": "Payment failed" }) async def _on_shipment_failed(self, event: Dict): """Shipment failed - refund payment and release inventory.""" await self.event_bus.publish("RefundPayment", { "saga_id": event["saga_id"], "payment_id": event["payment_id"] }) await self.event_bus.publish("ReleaseInventory", { "saga_id": event["saga_id"], "reservation_id": event["reservation_id"] }) ``` ### Template 4: Saga with Timeouts ```python class TimeoutSagaOrchestrator(SagaOrchestrator): """Saga orchestrator with step timeouts.""" def __init__(self, saga_store, event_publisher, scheduler): super().__init__(saga_store, event_publisher) self.scheduler = scheduler async def _execute_next_step(self, saga: Saga): if saga.current_step >= len(saga.steps): return step = saga.steps[saga.current_step] step.status = "executing" step.timeout_at = datetime.utcnow() + timedelta(minutes=5) await self.saga_store.save(saga) # Schedule timeout check await self.scheduler.schedule( f"saga_timeout_{saga.saga_id}_{step.name}", self._check_timeout, {"saga_id": saga.saga_id, "step_name": step.name}, run_at=step.timeout_at ) await self.event_publisher.publish( step.action, {"saga_id": saga.saga_id, "step_name": step.name, **saga.data} ) async def _check_timeout(self, data: Dict): """Check if step has timed out.""" saga = await self.saga_store.get(data["saga_id"]) step = next(s for s in saga.steps if s.name == data["step_name"]) if step.status == "executing": # Step timed out - fail it await self.handle_step_failed( data["saga_id"], data["step_name"], "Step timed out" ) ``` ## Best Practices ### Do's - **Make steps idempotent** - Safe to retry - **Design compensations carefully** - They must work - **Use correlation IDs** - For tracing across services - **Implement timeouts** - Don't wait forever - **Log everything** - For debugging failures ### Don'ts - **Don't assume instant completion** - Sagas take time - **Don't skip compensation testing** - Most critical part - **Don't couple services** - Use async messaging - **Don't ignore partial failures** - Handle gracefully ## Resources - [Saga Pattern](https://microservices.io/patterns/data/saga.html) - [Designing Data-Intensive Applications](https://dataintensive.net/)
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

github-actions-templates

Create production-ready GitHub Actions workflows for automated

coding
⭐1
# GitHub Actions Templates Production-ready GitHub Actions workflow patterns for testing, building, and deploying applications. ## Purpose Create efficient, secure GitHub Actions workflows for continuous integration and deployment across various tech stacks. ## When to Use - Automate testing and deployment - Build Docker images and push to registries - Deploy to Kubernetes clusters - Run security scans - Implement matrix builds for multiple environments ## Common Workflow Patterns ### Pattern 1: Test Workflow ```yaml name: Test on: push: branches: [main, develop] pull_request: branches: [main] jobs: test: runs-on: ubuntu-latest strategy: matrix: node-version: [18.x, 20.x] steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - name: Use Node.js ${{ matrix.node-version }} uses: actions/setup-node@v4 with: node-version: ${{ matrix.node-version }} cache: "npm" - name: Install dependencies run: npm ci - name: Run linter run: npm run lint - name: Run tests run: npm test - name: Upload coverage uses: codecov/codecov-action@v3 with: files: ./coverage/lcov.info ``` **Reference:** See `assets/test-workflow.yml` ### Pattern 2: Build and Push Docker Image ```yaml name: Build and Push on: push: branches: [main] tags: ["v*"] env: REGISTRY: ghcr.io IMAGE_NAME: ${{ github.repository }} jobs: build: runs-on: ubuntu-latest permissions: contents: read packages: write steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - name: Log in to Container Registry uses: docker/login-action@v3 with: registry: ${{ env.REGISTRY }} username: ${{ github.actor }} password: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} - name: Extract metadata id: meta uses: docker/metadata-action@v5 with: images: ${{ env.REGISTRY }}/${{ env.IMAGE_NAME }} tags: | type=ref,event=branch type=ref,event=pr type=semver,pattern={{version}} type=semver,pattern={{major}}.{{minor}} - name: Build and push uses: docker/build-push-action@v5 with: context: . push: true tags: ${{ steps.meta.outputs.tags }} labels: ${{ steps.meta.outputs.labels }} cache-from: type=gha cache-to: type=gha,mode=max ``` **Reference:** See `assets/deploy-workflow.yml` ### Pattern 3: Deploy to Kubernetes ```yaml name: Deploy to Kubernetes on: push: branches: [main] jobs: deploy: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - name: Configure AWS credentials uses: aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials@v4 with: aws-access-key-id: ${{ secrets.AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID }} aws-secret-access-key: ${{ secrets.AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY }} aws-region: us-west-2 - name: Update kubeconfig run: | aws eks update-kubeconfig --name production-cluster --region us-west-2 - name: Deploy to Kubernetes run: | kubectl apply -f k8s/ kubectl rollout status deployment/my-app -n production kubectl get services -n production - name: Verify deployment run: | kubectl get pods -n production kubectl describe deployment my-app -n production ``` ### Pattern 4: Matrix Build ```yaml name: Matrix Build on: [push, pull_request] jobs: build: runs-on: ${{ matrix.os }} strategy: matrix: os: [ubuntu-latest, macos-latest, windows-latest] python-version: ["3.9", "3.10", "3.11", "3.12"] steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - name: Set up Python uses: actions/setup-python@v5 with: python-version: ${{ matrix.python-version }} - name: Install dependencies run: | python -m pip install --upgrade pip pip install -r requirements.txt - name: Run tests run: pytest ``` **Reference:** See `assets/matrix-build.yml` ## Workflow Best Practices 1. **Use specific action versions** (@v4, not @latest) 2. **Cache dependencies** to speed up builds 3. **Use secrets** for sensitive data 4. **Implement status checks** on PRs 5. **Use matrix builds** for multi-version testing 6. **Set appropriate permissions** 7. **Use reusable workflows** for common patterns 8. **Implement approval gates** for production 9. **Add notification steps** for failures 10. **Use self-hosted runners** for sensitive workloads ## Reusable Workflows ```yaml # .github/workflows/reusable-test.yml name: Reusable Test Workflow on: workflow_call: inputs: node-version: required: true type: string secrets: NPM_TOKEN: required: true jobs: test: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - uses: actions/setup-node@v4 with: node-version: ${{ inputs.node-version }} - run: npm ci - run: npm test ``` **Use reusable workflow:** ```yaml jobs: call-test: uses: ./.github/workflows/reusable-test.yml with: node-version: "20.x" secrets: NPM_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.NPM_TOKEN }} ``` ## Security Scanning ```yaml name: Security Scan on: push: branches: [main] pull_request: branches: [main] jobs: security: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - name: Run Trivy vulnerability scanner uses: aquasecurity/trivy-action@master with: scan-type: "fs" scan-ref: "." format: "sarif" output: "trivy-results.sarif" - name: Upload Trivy results to GitHub Security uses: github/codeql-action/upload-sarif@v2 with: sarif_file: "trivy-results.sarif" - name: Run Snyk Security Scan uses: snyk/actions/node@master env: SNYK_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.SNYK_TOKEN }} ``` ## Deployment with Approvals ```yaml name: Deploy to Production on: push: tags: ["v*"] jobs: deploy: runs-on: ubuntu-latest environment: name: production url: https://app.example.com steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - name: Deploy application run: | echo "Deploying to production..." # Deployment commands here - name: Notify Slack if: success() uses: slackapi/slack-github-action@v1 with: webhook-url: ${{ secrets.SLACK_WEBHOOK }} payload: | { "text": "Deployment to production completed successfully!" } ``` ## Reference Files - `assets/test-workflow.yml` - Testing workflow template - `assets/deploy-workflow.yml` - Deployment workflow template - `assets/matrix-build.yml` - Matrix build template - `references/common-workflows.md` - Common workflow patterns ## Related Skills - `gitlab-ci-patterns` - For GitLab CI workflows - `deployment-pipeline-design` - For pipeline architecture - `secrets-management` - For secrets handling
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered