Skip to main content
EVOKORE// BROWSE
>

./browse/prompts

77 NODES
πŸ€–system promptβ€’6 months ago

Cross-CLI MCP Config Sync

Keep Claude, Cursor, Gemini, and related CLI integrations aligned with a repeatable dry-run and apply workflow.

productivity
⭐1
# Cross-CLI MCP Config Sync Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this skill when multiple AI clients need the same MCP configuration without drifting out of sync. ## Use this when - Rolling out a shared MCP config to multiple clients - Previewing config changes before applying them - Standardizing developer setup across tools ## Expected outcomes - Cross-client MCP setup becomes easier to repeat - Dry-run and apply modes reduce accidental changes - Environment-specific details stay documented near the workflow ## Source synthesis - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/CLI_INTEGRATION.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/CLI_INTEGRATION.md) ## Dedupe notes Uses the dedicated CLI integration guide as the canonical source for config sync instead of duplicating setup notes elsewhere. ## Source excerpts ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/CLI_INTEGRATION.md EVOKORE-MCP isn't just an MCP Server-Ò€—it also ships with natively integrated UI hooks designed to make your AI CLI experience (like Gemini CLI or Claude Code) significantly more powerful and transparent. ## 🍨 The Interactive Status Line When you connect EVOKORE-MCP to your AI Assistant, you can optionally enable the **EVOKORE Status Line**. Every time the AI finishes a thought or a tool execution, this hook intercepts the internal JSON payload and renders a beautiful, color-coded ASCII status bar at the bottom of your terminal showing: - **Location**: Your current working directory. - **Model Identity**: The exact LLM model currently loaded. - **Skill Count**: A live count of the MCP Agent Skills currently indexed in your library. - **Context Window Health**: A dynamic, color-coded progress bar showing exactly how many tokens you have consumed. --- ### 💜 Enabling in Gemini CLI Gemini CLI features a robust native hook engine. You can configure it to execute the EVOKORE Status Line immediately after every model response (`AfterModel`). **Step 1:** Locate your global settings file (`~/.gemini/settings.json`). **Step 2:** Ensure hooks are enabled, and add the `AfterModel` event array to the root of the JSON object: ```json { "enableHooks": true, "hooks": { "AfterModel": [ { "type": "command", "command": "node /absolute/path/to/EVOKORE-MCP/scripts/status.js" } ] } } ``` **Step 3:** Restart your Gemini CLI! --- ### 💜 Enabling in Claude Code Claude Code features an undocumented internal hook architecture that natively supports this status line. *(Note: Because this feature is currently undocumented by Anthropic, Claude Code's `doctor` command will display "Found 1 settings issue". This is perfectly normal and the status line will still execute successfully)*. **Step 1:** Locate your Claude settings file (`~/.claude/settings.json`). **Step 2:** Add the `statusLine` block to the root of the JSON object: ```json { "statusLine": { "type": "command", "command": "node /absolute/path/to/EVOKORE-MCP/scripts/status.js" } } ``` **Step 3:** Restart Claude Code. --- ### Òő ï¸ A Note on GitHub Copilot and Codex Microsoft's GitHub Copilot CLI and OpenAI's Codex CLI **do not natively support** these JSON hook configurations. If you want the EVOKORE Status Line to appear after commands in these tools, you must configure a native PowerShell/Bash alias wrapper around the CLI execution. **Example (PowerShell Profile):** ```powershell function copilot-evokore { gh copilot $args node "/absolute/path/to/EV ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ€–system promptβ€’6 months ago

Hook Observability and Session Replay

Instrument hooks with replayable logs, task-state visibility, and non-blocking observability around agent sessions.

devops
⭐1
# Hook Observability and Session Replay Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this skill when you need to understand what hooks fired, what they emitted, and how a session can be replayed after the fact. ## Use this when - Debugging hook-driven automation - Replaying session events after failures - Adding observability without blocking interactive work ## Expected outcomes - Hook activity becomes inspectable and replayable - Operational state survives beyond a single terminal session - Observability stays useful without overwhelming operators ## Source synthesis - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/VOICE_AND_HOOKS.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/VOICE_AND_HOOKS.md) - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/USE_CASES_AND_WALKTHROUGHS.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/USE_CASES_AND_WALKTHROUGHS.md) ## Dedupe notes Focuses on replay and observability instead of importing the broader voice-sidecar guide verbatim. ## Source excerpts ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/VOICE_AND_HOOKS.md EVOKORE currently has three separate voice-related systems plus a set of hook and observability utilities. They overlap in operator workflows, but they are not the same runtime. ## The three voice-related systems ### 1. ElevenLabs MCP proxy This is the optional `elevenlabs` child server configured in `mcp.config.json`. What it is: - proxied through the EVOKORE router - exposed as prefixed MCP tools - available to any EVOKORE-connected MCP client when configured successfully What it is for: - text-to-speech and other ElevenLabs MCP operations as tools - routing voice-related actions through the standard EVOKORE proxy/security stack Requirements: - `uvx` available on PATH - `ELEVENLABS_API_KEY` set ### 2. VoiceMode VoiceMode is a separate voice-conversation system for Claude Code. What it is: - registered separately from EVOKORE - not routed through EVOKOREÒ€ℒs stdio server - used for bidirectional voice conversation in Claude Code What it is for: - speaking to Claude and hearing spoken responses - using `OPENAI_API_KEY` and VoiceModeÒ€ℒs own runtime Windows note: - VoiceMode relies on `uvx` being directly available - set `OPENAI_API_KEY` in the shell that launches Claude Code ### 3. VoiceSidecar VoiceSidecar is a standalone WebSocket server implemented in `src/Voice ... ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/USE_CASES_AND_WALKTHROUGHS.md This guide turns the runtime contracts into practical operator flows. ## Walkthrough 1: Adopt a workflow from the skill library Use this when you want EVOKORE to retrieve process guidance before the model starts acting. ### Goal Find and adopt an existing workflow such as `session-wrap`. ### Steps 1. Ask the client to search skills: ```text Search the MCP for a workflow about session wrap-up and continuity. ``` 2. EVOKORE uses `search_skills` and returns matching skills. 3. Ask for a specific skill: ```text Show me help for the session-wrap skill. ``` 4. EVOKORE uses `get_skill_help` and returns the skillÒ€ℒs internal instructions. 5. For broader task matching, ask: ```text Resolve a workflow for wrapping this session, documenting open risks, and preparing the next handoff. ``` 6. EVOKORE uses `resolve_workflow` and injects the top 1-3 relevant workflows directly into the tool response. ### Why this matters - keeps the model grounded in repo-specific process - reduces prompt drift - makes handoff and governance behavior repeatable ## Walkthrough 2: Use a proxied tool that requires HITL approval Use this when the tool is configured as `require_approval` in `permissions.yml`. ### Goal Allow a protected proxied tool call such as `fs_write_f ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ€–system promptβ€’6 months ago

Multi-Server MCP Aggregation Pattern

Aggregate tools across multiple MCP child servers with prefixing, collision avoidance, and routing rules that stay deterministic.

architecture
⭐1
# Multi-Server MCP Aggregation Pattern Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this pattern when an MCP host must broker tools from multiple child servers without sacrificing clarity or control. ## Use this when - Combining tools from several MCP backends - Avoiding tool-name collisions across providers - Keeping origin and routing visible during execution ## Expected outcomes - Server-prefixed names make tool origins obvious - Collisions are avoided without brittle manual renaming - Operators can extend the tool surface without losing determinism ## Source synthesis - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/AGENT33_IMPROVEMENT_INSTRUCTIONS.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/AGENT33_IMPROVEMENT_INSTRUCTIONS.md) - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/TOOLS_AND_DISCOVERY.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/TOOLS_AND_DISCOVERY.md) ## Dedupe notes Uses the improvement-transfer doc as the primary source, with the discovery doc covering prefixing and compatibility details. ## Source excerpts ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/AGENT33_IMPROVEMENT_INSTRUCTIONS.md > **Purpose**: Feed this file into Claude Code CLI when working on the Agent33 repo. It contains patterns, architectures, and capabilities proven in EVOKORE-MCP that Agent33 should adopt. --- ## 1. Multi-Server MCP Aggregation Pattern **What Agent33 lacks**: Agent33's MCP server (Phase 43) is a single-endpoint bridge. It doesn't aggregate multiple child MCP servers behind a unified namespace. **What to build**: A proxy layer that spawns and manages multiple child MCP servers from a single config file, presenting them as one unified tool surface. ### Implementation spec: ``` mcp.config.json { "servers": { "github": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-github"], "env": { "GITHUB_TOKEN": "${GITHUB_TOKEN}" } }, "fs": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem", "./"] }, "elevenlabs": { "command": "uvx", "args": ["elevenlabs-mcp"], "env": { "ELEVENLABS_API_KEY": "${ELEVENLABS_API_KEY}" } } } } ``` **Key patterns from EVOKORE**: - **Tool name prefixing**: Every proxied tool gets renamed `{serverId}_{originalName}` to prevent namespace collisions (e.g., `github_create_issue`, `fs_read_file`). First-registration-wins for duplicates. - **Environment interpolation**: `${VAR}` syntax in `env` blocks resolved ... ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/TOOLS_AND_DISCOVERY.md This page explains how EVOKORE presents tools, how proxy names are built, and how `discover_tools` changes the visible tool surface. ## Two tool populations ### Native EVOKORE tools These tools are defined by EVOKORE itself: - `docs_architect` - `skill_creator` - `resolve_workflow` - `search_skills` - `get_skill_help` - `discover_tools` Properties: - always available - always visible - not subject to proxy prefixing ### Proxied child-server tools These come from child servers in `mcp.config.json`. Current configured sources: - `github` - `fs` - optional `elevenlabs` Properties: - fetched from child servers at startup - renamed with server prefixes - governed by `permissions.yml` - routed through `ProxyManager` ## Prefixing and compatibility EVOKORE rewrites proxied tool names to: ```text ${serverId}_${tool.name} ``` Why this exists: - prevents tool-name collisions across child servers - makes origin obvious during execution and review - keeps exact-name routing deterministic Examples: | Upstream tool | EVOKORE-exposed tool | |---|---| | `read_file` from `fs` | `fs_read_file` | | `create_issue` from `github` | `github_create_issue` | ### Duplicate-prefixed name policy If two child registrations would create the same final prefixed name: - the first registrati ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ€–system promptβ€’6 months ago

Dynamic Tool Discovery and Session Activation

Expose only native tools at session start, then activate proxied tools on demand through a searchable discovery layer.

architecture
⭐1
# Dynamic Tool Discovery and Session Activation Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this skill when you need smaller tool payloads, exact-name compatibility, and session-scoped tool activation. ## Use this when - Reducing tool-list bloat for focused sessions - Preserving exact-name tool calls while hiding noise - Activating proxied tools only when a task requires them ## Expected outcomes - Discovery changes listing visibility without breaking routing - Session-scoped activation keeps tools relevant to the task - Operators can trade compatibility against payload size intentionally ## Source synthesis - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/TOOLS_AND_DISCOVERY.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/TOOLS_AND_DISCOVERY.md) ## Dedupe notes Uses the canonical EVOKORE-MCP discovery doc instead of duplicating the same concept from walkthrough and migration docs. ## Source excerpts ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/TOOLS_AND_DISCOVERY.md This page explains how EVOKORE presents tools, how proxy names are built, and how `discover_tools` changes the visible tool surface. ## Two tool populations ### Native EVOKORE tools These tools are defined by EVOKORE itself: - `docs_architect` - `skill_creator` - `resolve_workflow` - `search_skills` - `get_skill_help` - `discover_tools` Properties: - always available - always visible - not subject to proxy prefixing ### Proxied child-server tools These come from child servers in `mcp.config.json`. Current configured sources: - `github` - `fs` - optional `elevenlabs` Properties: - fetched from child servers at startup - renamed with server prefixes - governed by `permissions.yml` - routed through `ProxyManager` ## Prefixing and compatibility EVOKORE rewrites proxied tool names to: ```text ${serverId}_${tool.name} ``` Why this exists: - prevents tool-name collisions across child servers - makes origin obvious during execution and review - keeps exact-name routing deterministic Examples: | Upstream tool | EVOKORE-exposed tool | |---|---| | `read_file` from `fs` | `fs_read_file` | | `create_issue` from `github` | `github_create_issue` | ### Duplicate-prefixed name policy If two child registrations would create the same final prefixed name: - the first registration wins - later duplicates are skipped - EVOKORE logs a warning and duplicate summary ## Discovery modes | Mode | What `tools/list` returns | Best for | |---|---|---| | `legacy` | all native + proxied tools | maximum compatibility | | `dynamic` | native tools + session-activated proxied tools | smaller initial tool payloads | Environment toggle: ```bash EVOKORE_TOOL_DISCOVERY_MODE=legacy EVOKORE_TOOL_DISCOVERY_MODE=dynamic ``` ## Dynamic discovery lifecycle In `dynamic` mode, EVOKORE uses a session-scoped activation set. Lifecycle: 1. session starts with only native tools visible 2. user/model calls `discover_tools` 3. `ToolCatalogIndex` searches the merged native + proxied catalog 4. matching proxied tools are activated for that session 5. EVOKORE emits `sendToolListChanged()` best-effort 6. client re-runs `tools/list` or auto-refreshes ```mermaid flowchart TD A[Session starts in dynamic mode] --> B[tools/list shows native tools] B --> C[discover_tools query] C --> D[ToolCatalogIndex searches merged catalog] D --> E[Matching proxied tools added to session activation set] E --> F[sendToolListChanged best-effort] F --> G[Client refreshes tools/list] G --> H[Activated proxied tools now visible] D --> I[Exact-name proxied call still works eve ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ“textβ€’6 months ago

Docker-Backed Jupyter Kernel Operator

Operate containerized Jupyter kernels with enablement, smoke checks, cleanup, and failure handling baked into the runbook.

devops
⭐1
# Docker-Backed Jupyter Kernel Operator Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this runbook when you need isolated notebook execution, clear container lifecycle management, and troubleshooting guidance. ## Use this when - Enabling containerized notebook workflows - Cleaning up kernel containers safely - Troubleshooting notebook execution environments ## Expected outcomes - Kernel startup and cleanup steps are documented end-to-end - Failure modes are easier to diagnose - Notebook execution can be repeated without manual guesswork ## Source synthesis - AGENT33/docs/runbooks/jupyter-kernel-containers.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/runbooks/jupyter-kernel-containers.md) ## Dedupe notes Uses the AGENT33 Jupyter container runbook as a focused operations import without duplicating broader walkthroughs. ## Source excerpts ### AGENT33/docs/runbooks/jupyter-kernel-containers.md ## Purpose Operate the Docker-backed Jupyter kernel adapter introduced for Phase 38 Stage 3 / Phase 42 follow-on work. ## Enablement Set: - `JUPYTER_KERNEL_ENABLED=true` - `JUPYTER_KERNEL_MODE=docker` Optional settings: - `JUPYTER_KERNEL_DOCKER_IMAGE` - `JUPYTER_KERNEL_ALLOWED_IMAGES` - `JUPYTER_KERNEL_NETWORK_ENABLED` - `JUPYTER_KERNEL_MOUNT_WORKDIR` - `JUPYTER_KERNEL_CONTAINER_WORKDIR` ## Operational Notes - Docker mode publishes kernel ports to the host and mounts a per-session runtime directory containing the Jupyter connection file. - When `JUPYTER_KERNEL_NETWORK_ENABLED=false`, the adapter starts containers with `--network none`. - Working-directory mounting is opt-in and should only point at paths already approved by workflow / execution policy. - The adapter enforces an image allowlist when one is configured. ## Failure Modes - `jupyter_client not installed`: install with `pip install agent33[jupyter]` - `docker executable not found`: install Docker and ensure `docker` is on `PATH` - `Docker image ... is not permitted`: align the requested image with `JUPYTER_KERNEL_ALLOWED_IMAGES` - kernel startup timeout: inspect Docker logs for the session container and verify the image includes `ipykernel` ## Cleanup - One-shot sessions are removed after execution. - Stateful sessions are removed explicitly or via adapter shutdown. - Forced cleanup uses `docker rm -f <container>` and deletes the runtime connection directory. ## Quick Smoke Workflow Register a minimal workflow that exercises the Docker-backed `code-interpreter` tool: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/workflows/ \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{ "name": "docker-kernel-smoke", "version": "1.0.0", "description": "Validate Docker-backed Jupyter execution", "triggers": {"manual": true}, "inputs": {}, "outputs": { "result": {"type": "object"} }, "steps": [ { "id": "run-notebook-code", "action": "execute-code", "inputs": { "tool_id": "code-interpreter", "language": "python", "code": "print(6 * 7)" } } ], "execution": {"mode": "sequential"} }' ``` Then execute it: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/workflows/docker-kernel-smoke/execute \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"inputs": {}}' ```
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

deployment-pipeline-design

Design multi-stage CI/CD pipelines with approval gates, security

coding
⭐1
# Deployment Pipeline Design Architecture patterns for multi-stage CI/CD pipelines with approval gates and deployment strategies. ## Purpose Design robust, secure deployment pipelines that balance speed with safety through proper stage organization and approval workflows. ## When to Use - Design CI/CD architecture - Implement deployment gates - Configure multi-environment pipelines - Establish deployment best practices - Implement progressive delivery ## Pipeline Stages ### Standard Pipeline Flow ``` β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ Build β”‚ β†’ β”‚ Test β”‚ β†’ β”‚ Staging β”‚ β†’ β”‚ Approveβ”‚ β†’ β”‚Productionβ”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ ``` ### Detailed Stage Breakdown 1. **Source** - Code checkout 2. **Build** - Compile, package, containerize 3. **Test** - Unit, integration, security scans 4. **Staging Deploy** - Deploy to staging environment 5. **Integration Tests** - E2E, smoke tests 6. **Approval Gate** - Manual approval required 7. **Production Deploy** - Canary, blue-green, rolling 8. **Verification** - Health checks, monitoring 9. **Rollback** - Automated rollback on failure ## Approval Gate Patterns ### Pattern 1: Manual Approval ```yaml # GitHub Actions production-deploy: needs: staging-deploy environment: name: production url: https://app.example.com runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - name: Deploy to production run: | # Deployment commands ``` ### Pattern 2: Time-Based Approval ```yaml # GitLab CI deploy:production: stage: deploy script: - deploy.sh production environment: name: production when: delayed start_in: 30 minutes only: - main ``` ### Pattern 3: Multi-Approver ```yaml # Azure Pipelines stages: - stage: Production dependsOn: Staging jobs: - deployment: Deploy environment: name: production resourceType: Kubernetes strategy: runOnce: preDeploy: steps: - task: ManualValidation@0 inputs: notifyUsers: "team-leads@example.com" instructions: "Review staging metrics before approving" ``` **Reference:** See `assets/approval-gate-template.yml` ## Deployment Strategies ### 1. Rolling Deployment ```yaml apiVersion: apps/v1 kind: Deployment metadata: name: my-app spec: replicas: 10 strategy: type: RollingUpdate rollingUpdate: maxSurge: 2 maxUnavailable: 1 ``` **Characteristics:** - Gradual rollout - Zero downtime - Easy rollback - Best for most applications ### 2. Blue-Green Deployment ```yaml # Blue (current) kubectl apply -f blue-deployment.yaml kubectl label service my-app version=blue # Green (new) kubectl apply -f green-deployment.yaml # Test green environment kubectl label service my-app version=green # Rollback if needed kubectl label service my-app version=blue ``` **Characteristics:** - Instant switchover - Easy rollback - Doubles infrastructure cost temporarily - Good for high-risk deployments ### 3. Canary Deployment ```yaml apiVersion: argoproj.io/v1alpha1 kind: Rollout metadata: name: my-app spec: replicas: 10 strategy: canary: steps: - setWeight: 10 - pause: { duration: 5m } - setWeight: 25 - pause: { duration: 5m } - setWeight: 50 - pause: { duration: 5m } - setWeight: 100 ``` **Characteristics:** - Gradual traffic shift - Risk mitigation - Real user testing - Requires service mesh or similar ### 4. Feature Flags ```python from flagsmith import Flagsmith flagsmith = Flagsmith(environment_key="API_KEY") if flagsmith.has_feature("new_checkout_flow"): # New code path process_checkout_v2() else: # Existing code path process_checkout_v1() ``` **Characteristics:** - Deploy without releasing - A/B testing - Instant rollback - Granular control ## Pipeline Orchestration ### Multi-Stage Pipeline Example ```yaml name: Production Pipeline on: push: branches: [main] jobs: build: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - name: Build application run: make build - name: Build Docker image run: docker build -t myapp:${{ github.sha }} . - name: Push to registry run: docker push myapp:${{ github.sha }} test: needs: build runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - name: Unit tests run: make test - name: Security scan run: trivy image myapp:${{ github.sha }} deploy-staging: needs: test runs-on: ubuntu-latest environment: name: staging steps: - name: Deploy to staging run: kubectl apply -f k8s/staging/ integration-test: needs: deploy-staging runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - name: Run E2E tests run: npm run test:e2e deploy-production: needs: integration-test runs-on: ubuntu-latest environment: name: production steps: - name: Canary deployment run: | kubectl apply -f k8s/production/ kubectl argo rollouts promote my-app verify: needs: deploy-production runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - name: Health check run: curl -f https://app.example.com/health - name: Notify team run: | curl -X POST ${{ secrets.SLACK_WEBHOOK }} \ -d '{"text":"Production deployment successful!"}' ``` ## Pipeline Best Practices 1. **Fail fast** - Run quick tests first 2. **Parallel execution** - Run independent jobs concurrently 3. **Caching** - Cache dependencies between runs 4. **Artifact management** - Store build artifacts 5. **Environment parity** - Keep environments consistent 6. **Secrets management** - Use secret stores (Vault, etc.) 7. **Deployment windows** - Schedule deployments appropriately 8. **Monitoring integration** - Track deployment metrics 9. **Rollback automation** - Auto-rollback on failures 10. **Documentation** - Document pipeline stages ## Rollback Strategies ### Automated Rollback ```yaml deploy-and-verify: steps: - name: Deploy new version run: kubectl apply -f k8s/ - name: Wait for rollout run: kubectl rollout status deployment/my-app - name: Health check id: health run: | for i in {1..10}; do if curl -sf https://app.example.com/health; then exit 0 fi sleep 10 done exit 1 - name: Rollback on failure if: failure() run: kubectl rollout undo deployment/my-app ``` ### Manual Rollback ```bash # List revision history kubectl rollout history deployment/my-app # Rollback to previous version kubectl rollout undo deployment/my-app # Rollback to specific revision kubectl rollout undo deployment/my-app --to-revision=3 ``` ## Monitoring and Metrics ### Key Pipeline Metrics - **Deployment Frequency** - How often deployments occur - **Lead Time** - Time from commit to production - **Change Failure Rate** - Percentage of failed deployments - **Mean Time to Recovery (MTTR)** - Time to recover from failure - **Pipeline Success Rate** - Percentage of successful runs - **Average Pipeline Duration** - Time to complete pipeline ### Integration with Monitoring ```yaml - name: Post-deployment verification run: | # Wait for metrics stabilization sleep 60 # Check error rate ERROR_RATE=$(curl -s "$PROMETHEUS_URL/api/v1/query?query=rate(http_errors_total[5m])" | jq '.data.result[0].value[1]') if (( $(echo "$ERROR_RATE > 0.01" | bc -l) )); then echo "Error rate too high: $ERROR_RATE" exit 1 fi ``` ## Reference Files - `references/pipeline-orchestration.md` - Complex pipeline patterns - `assets/approval-gate-template.yml` - Approval workflow templates ## Related Skills - `github-actions-templates` - For GitHub Actions implementation - `gitlab-ci-patterns` - For GitLab CI implementation - `secrets-management` - For secrets handling
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

web3-testing

Test smart contracts comprehensively using Hardhat and Foundry with

coding
⭐1
# Web3 Smart Contract Testing Master comprehensive testing strategies for smart contracts using Hardhat, Foundry, and advanced testing patterns. ## When to Use This Skill - Writing unit tests for smart contracts - Setting up integration test suites - Performing gas optimization testing - Fuzzing for edge cases - Forking mainnet for realistic testing - Automating test coverage reporting - Verifying contracts on Etherscan ## Hardhat Testing Setup ```javascript // hardhat.config.js require("@nomicfoundation/hardhat-toolbox"); require("@nomiclabs/hardhat-etherscan"); require("hardhat-gas-reporter"); require("solidity-coverage"); module.exports = { solidity: { version: "0.8.19", settings: { optimizer: { enabled: true, runs: 200, }, }, }, networks: { hardhat: { forking: { url: process.env.MAINNET_RPC_URL, blockNumber: 15000000, }, }, goerli: { url: process.env.GOERLI_RPC_URL, accounts: [process.env.PRIVATE_KEY], }, }, gasReporter: { enabled: true, currency: "USD", coinmarketcap: process.env.COINMARKETCAP_API_KEY, }, etherscan: { apiKey: process.env.ETHERSCAN_API_KEY, }, }; ``` ## Unit Testing Patterns ```javascript const { expect } = require("chai"); const { ethers } = require("hardhat"); const { loadFixture, time, } = require("@nomicfoundation/hardhat-network-helpers"); describe("Token Contract", function () { // Fixture for test setup async function deployTokenFixture() { const [owner, addr1, addr2] = await ethers.getSigners(); const Token = await ethers.getContractFactory("Token"); const token = await Token.deploy(); return { token, owner, addr1, addr2 }; } describe("Deployment", function () { it("Should set the right owner", async function () { const { token, owner } = await loadFixture(deployTokenFixture); expect(await token.owner()).to.equal(owner.address); }); it("Should assign total supply to owner", async function () { const { token, owner } = await loadFixture(deployTokenFixture); const ownerBalance = await token.balanceOf(owner.address); expect(await token.totalSupply()).to.equal(ownerBalance); }); }); describe("Transactions", function () { it("Should transfer tokens between accounts", async function () { const { token, owner, addr1 } = await loadFixture(deployTokenFixture); await expect(token.transfer(addr1.address, 50)).to.changeTokenBalances( token, [owner, addr1], [-50, 50], ); }); it("Should fail if sender doesn't have enough tokens", async function () { const { token, addr1 } = await loadFixture(deployTokenFixture); const initialBalance = await token.balanceOf(addr1.address); await expect( token.connect(addr1).transfer(owner.address, 1), ).to.be.revertedWith("Insufficient balance"); }); it("Should emit Transfer event", async function () { const { token, owner, addr1 } = await loadFixture(deployTokenFixture); await expect(token.transfer(addr1.address, 50)) .to.emit(token, "Transfer") .withArgs(owner.address, addr1.address, 50); }); }); describe("Time-based tests", function () { it("Should handle time-locked operations", async function () { const { token } = await loadFixture(deployTokenFixture); // Increase time by 1 day await time.increase(86400); // Test time-dependent functionality }); }); describe("Gas optimization", function () { it("Should use gas efficiently", async function () { const { token } = await loadFixture(deployTokenFixture); const tx = await token.transfer(addr1.address, 100); const receipt = await tx.wait(); expect(receipt.gasUsed).to.be.lessThan(50000); }); }); }); ``` ## Foundry Testing (Forge) ```solidity // SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT pragma solidity ^0.8.0; import "forge-std/Test.sol"; import "../src/Token.sol"; contract TokenTest is Test { Token token; address owner = address(1); address user1 = address(2); address user2 = address(3); function setUp() public { vm.prank(owner); token = new Token(); } function testInitialSupply() public { assertEq(token.totalSupply(), 1000000 * 10**18); } function testTransfer() public { vm.prank(owner); token.transfer(user1, 100); assertEq(token.balanceOf(user1), 100); assertEq(token.balanceOf(owner), token.totalSupply() - 100); } function testFailTransferInsufficientBalance() public { vm.prank(user1); token.transfer(user2, 100); // Should fail } function testCannotTransferToZeroAddress() public { vm.prank(owner); vm.expectRevert("Invalid recipient"); token.transfer(address(0), 100); } // Fuzzing test function testFuzzTransfer(uint256 amount) public { vm.assume(amount > 0 && amount <= token.totalSupply()); vm.prank(owner); token.transfer(user1, amount); assertEq(token.balanceOf(user1), amount); } // Test with cheatcodes function testDealAndPrank() public { // Give ETH to address vm.deal(user1, 10 ether); // Impersonate address vm.prank(user1); // Test functionality assertEq(user1.balance, 10 ether); } // Mainnet fork test function testForkMainnet() public { vm.createSelectFork("https://eth-mainnet.alchemyapi.io/v2/..."); // Interact with mainnet contracts address dai = 0x6B175474E89094C44Da98b954EedeAC495271d0F; assertEq(IERC20(dai).symbol(), "DAI"); } } ``` ## Advanced Testing Patterns ### Snapshot and Revert ```javascript describe("Complex State Changes", function () { let snapshotId; beforeEach(async function () { snapshotId = await network.provider.send("evm_snapshot"); }); afterEach(async function () { await network.provider.send("evm_revert", [snapshotId]); }); it("Test 1", async function () { // Make state changes }); it("Test 2", async function () { // State reverted, clean slate }); }); ``` ### Mainnet Forking ```javascript describe("Mainnet Fork Tests", function () { let uniswapRouter, dai, usdc; before(async function () { await network.provider.request({ method: "hardhat_reset", params: [ { forking: { jsonRpcUrl: process.env.MAINNET_RPC_URL, blockNumber: 15000000, }, }, ], }); // Connect to existing mainnet contracts uniswapRouter = await ethers.getContractAt( "IUniswapV2Router", "0x7a250d5630B4cF539739dF2C5dAcb4c659F2488D", ); dai = await ethers.getContractAt( "IERC20", "0x6B175474E89094C44Da98b954EedeAC495271d0F", ); }); it("Should swap on Uniswap", async function () { // Test with real Uniswap contracts }); }); ``` ### Impersonating Accounts ```javascript it("Should impersonate whale account", async function () { const whaleAddress = "0x..."; await network.provider.request({ method: "hardhat_impersonateAccount", params: [whaleAddress], }); const whale = await ethers.getSigner(whaleAddress); // Use whale's tokens await dai .connect(whale) .transfer(addr1.address, ethers.utils.parseEther("1000")); }); ``` ## Gas Optimization Testing ```javascript const { expect } = require("chai"); describe("Gas Optimization", function () { it("Compare gas usage between implementations", async function () { const Implementation1 = await ethers.getContractFactory("OptimizedContract"); const Implementation2 = await ethers.getContractFactory( "UnoptimizedContract", ); const contract1 = await Implementation1.deploy(); const contract2 = await Implementation2.deploy(); const tx1 = await contract1.doSomething(); const receipt1 = await tx1.wait(); const tx2 = await contract2.doSomething(); const receipt2 = await tx2.wait(); console.log("Optimized gas:", receipt1.gasUsed.toString()); console.log("Unoptimized gas:", receipt2.gasUsed.toString()); expect(receipt1.gasUsed).to.be.lessThan(receipt2.gasUsed); }); }); ``` ## Coverage Reporting ```bash # Generate coverage report npx hardhat coverage # Output shows: # File | % Stmts | % Branch | % Funcs | % Lines | # -------------------|---------|----------|---------|---------| # contracts/Token.sol | 100 | 90 | 100 | 95 | ``` ## Contract Verification ```javascript // Verify on Etherscan await hre.run("verify:verify", { address: contractAddress, constructorArguments: [arg1, arg2], }); ``` ```bash # Or via CLI npx hardhat verify --network mainnet CONTRACT_ADDRESS "Constructor arg1" "arg2" ``` ## CI/CD Integration ```yaml # .github/workflows/test.yml name: Tests on: [push, pull_request] jobs: test: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v2 - uses: actions/setup-node@v2 with: node-version: "16" - run: npm install - run: npx hardhat compile - run: npx hardhat test - run: npx hardhat coverage - name: Upload coverage to Codecov uses: codecov/codecov-action@v2 ``` ## Resources - **references/hardhat-setup.md**: Hardhat configuration guide - **references/foundry-setup.md**: Foundry testing framework - **references/test-patterns.md**: Testing best practices - **references/mainnet-forking.md**: Fork testing strategies - **references/contract-verification.md**: Etherscan verification - **assets/hardhat-config.js**: Complete Hardhat configuration - **assets/test-suite.js**: Comprehensive test examples - **assets/foundry.toml**: Foundry configuration - **scripts/test-contract.sh**: Automated testing script ## Best Practices 1. **Test Coverage**: Aim for >90% coverage 2. **Edge Cases**: Test boundary conditions 3. **Gas Limits**: Verify functions don't hit block gas limit 4. **Reentrancy**: Test for reentrancy vulnerabilities 5. **Access Control**: Test unauthorized access attempts 6. **Events**: Verify event emissions 7. **Fixtures**: Use fixtures to avoid code duplication 8. **Mainnet Fork**: Test with real contracts 9. **Fuzzing**: Use property-based testing 10. **CI/CD**: Automate testing on every commit
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

fastapi-templates

Create production-ready FastAPI projects with async patterns,

coding
⭐1
# FastAPI Project Templates Production-ready FastAPI project structures with async patterns, dependency injection, middleware, and best practices for building high-performance APIs. ## When to Use This Skill - Starting new FastAPI projects from scratch - Implementing async REST APIs with Python - Building high-performance web services and microservices - Creating async applications with PostgreSQL, MongoDB - Setting up API projects with proper structure and testing ## Core Concepts ### 1. Project Structure **Recommended Layout:** ``` app/ β”œβ”€β”€ api/ # API routes β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ v1/ β”‚ β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ endpoints/ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ users.py β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ auth.py β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ └── items.py β”‚ β”‚ └── router.py β”‚ └── dependencies.py # Shared dependencies β”œβ”€β”€ core/ # Core configuration β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ config.py β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ security.py β”‚ └── database.py β”œβ”€β”€ models/ # Database models β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ user.py β”‚ └── item.py β”œβ”€β”€ schemas/ # Pydantic schemas β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ user.py β”‚ └── item.py β”œβ”€β”€ services/ # Business logic β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ user_service.py β”‚ └── auth_service.py β”œβ”€β”€ repositories/ # Data access β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ user_repository.py β”‚ └── item_repository.py └── main.py # Application entry ``` ### 2. Dependency Injection FastAPI's built-in DI system using `Depends`: - Database session management - Authentication/authorization - Shared business logic - Configuration injection ### 3. Async Patterns Proper async/await usage: - Async route handlers - Async database operations - Async background tasks - Async middleware ## Implementation Patterns ### Pattern 1: Complete FastAPI Application ```python # main.py from fastapi import FastAPI, Depends from fastapi.middleware.cors import CORSMiddleware from contextlib import asynccontextmanager @asynccontextmanager async def lifespan(app: FastAPI): """Application lifespan events.""" # Startup await database.connect() yield # Shutdown await database.disconnect() app = FastAPI( title="API Template", version="1.0.0", lifespan=lifespan ) # CORS middleware app.add_middleware( CORSMiddleware, allow_origins=["*"], allow_credentials=True, allow_methods=["*"], allow_headers=["*"], ) # Include routers from app.api.v1.router import api_router app.include_router(api_router, prefix="/api/v1") # core/config.py from pydantic_settings import BaseSettings from functools import lru_cache class Settings(BaseSettings): """Application settings.""" DATABASE_URL: str SECRET_KEY: str ACCESS_TOKEN_EXPIRE_MINUTES: int = 30 API_V1_STR: str = "/api/v1" class Config: env_file = ".env" @lru_cache() def get_settings() -> Settings: return Settings() # core/database.py from sqlalchemy.ext.asyncio import create_async_engine, AsyncSession from sqlalchemy.ext.declarative import declarative_base from sqlalchemy.orm import sessionmaker from app.core.config import get_settings settings = get_settings() engine = create_async_engine( settings.DATABASE_URL, echo=True, future=True ) AsyncSessionLocal = sessionmaker( engine, class_=AsyncSession, expire_on_commit=False ) Base = declarative_base() async def get_db() -> AsyncSession: """Dependency for database session.""" async with AsyncSessionLocal() as session: try: yield session await session.commit() except Exception: await session.rollback() raise finally: await session.close() ``` ### Pattern 2: CRUD Repository Pattern ```python # repositories/base_repository.py from typing import Generic, TypeVar, Type, Optional, List from sqlalchemy.ext.asyncio import AsyncSession from sqlalchemy import select from pydantic import BaseModel ModelType = TypeVar("ModelType") CreateSchemaType = TypeVar("CreateSchemaType", bound=BaseModel) UpdateSchemaType = TypeVar("UpdateSchemaType", bound=BaseModel) class BaseRepository(Generic[ModelType, CreateSchemaType, UpdateSchemaType]): """Base repository for CRUD operations.""" def __init__(self, model: Type[ModelType]): self.model = model async def get(self, db: AsyncSession, id: int) -> Optional[ModelType]: """Get by ID.""" result = await db.execute( select(self.model).where(self.model.id == id) ) return result.scalars().first() async def get_multi( self, db: AsyncSession, skip: int = 0, limit: int = 100 ) -> List[ModelType]: """Get multiple records.""" result = await db.execute( select(self.model).offset(skip).limit(limit) ) return result.scalars().all() async def create( self, db: AsyncSession, obj_in: CreateSchemaType ) -> ModelType: """Create new record.""" db_obj = self.model(**obj_in.dict()) db.add(db_obj) await db.flush() await db.refresh(db_obj) return db_obj async def update( self, db: AsyncSession, db_obj: ModelType, obj_in: UpdateSchemaType ) -> ModelType: """Update record.""" update_data = obj_in.dict(exclude_unset=True) for field, value in update_data.items(): setattr(db_obj, field, value) await db.flush() await db.refresh(db_obj) return db_obj async def delete(self, db: AsyncSession, id: int) -> bool: """Delete record.""" obj = await self.get(db, id) if obj: await db.delete(obj) return True return False # repositories/user_repository.py from app.repositories.base_repository import BaseRepository from app.models.user import User from app.schemas.user import UserCreate, UserUpdate class UserRepository(BaseRepository[User, UserCreate, UserUpdate]): """User-specific repository.""" async def get_by_email(self, db: AsyncSession, email: str) -> Optional[User]: """Get user by email.""" result = await db.execute( select(User).where(User.email == email) ) return result.scalars().first() async def is_active(self, db: AsyncSession, user_id: int) -> bool: """Check if user is active.""" user = await self.get(db, user_id) return user.is_active if user else False user_repository = UserRepository(User) ``` ### Pattern 3: Service Layer ```python # services/user_service.py from typing import Optional from sqlalchemy.ext.asyncio import AsyncSession from app.repositories.user_repository import user_repository from app.schemas.user import UserCreate, UserUpdate, User from app.core.security import get_password_hash, verify_password class UserService: """Business logic for users.""" def __init__(self): self.repository = user_repository async def create_user( self, db: AsyncSession, user_in: UserCreate ) -> User: """Create new user with hashed password.""" # Check if email exists existing = await self.repository.get_by_email(db, user_in.email) if existing: raise ValueError("Email already registered") # Hash password user_in_dict = user_in.dict() user_in_dict["hashed_password"] = get_password_hash(user_in_dict.pop("password")) # Create user user = await self.repository.create(db, UserCreate(**user_in_dict)) return user async def authenticate( self, db: AsyncSession, email: str, password: str ) -> Optional[User]: """Authenticate user.""" user = await self.repository.get_by_email(db, email) if not user: return None if not verify_password(password, user.hashed_password): return None return user async def update_user( self, db: AsyncSession, user_id: int, user_in: UserUpdate ) -> Optional[User]: """Update user.""" user = await self.repository.get(db, user_id) if not user: return None if user_in.password: user_in_dict = user_in.dict(exclude_unset=True) user_in_dict["hashed_password"] = get_password_hash( user_in_dict.pop("password") ) user_in = UserUpdate(**user_in_dict) return await self.repository.update(db, user, user_in) user_service = UserService() ``` ### Pattern 4: API Endpoints with Dependencies ```python # api/v1/endpoints/users.py from fastapi import APIRouter, Depends, HTTPException, status from sqlalchemy.ext.asyncio import AsyncSession from typing import List from app.core.database import get_db from app.schemas.user import User, UserCreate, UserUpdate from app.services.user_service import user_service from app.api.dependencies import get_current_user router = APIRouter() @router.post("/", response_model=User, status_code=status.HTTP_201_CREATED) async def create_user( user_in: UserCreate, db: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db) ): """Create new user.""" try: user = await user_service.create_user(db, user_in) return user except ValueError as e: raise HTTPException(status_code=400, detail=str(e)) @router.get("/me", response_model=User) async def read_current_user( current_user: User = Depends(get_current_user) ): """Get current user.""" return current_user @router.get("/{user_id}", response_model=User) async def read_user( user_id: int, db: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db), current_user: User = Depends(get_current_user) ): """Get user by ID.""" user = await user_service.repository.get(db, user_id) if not user: raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="User not found") return user @router.patch("/{user_id}", response_model=User) async def update_user( user_id: int, user_in: UserUpdate, db: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db), current_user: User = Depends(get_current_user) ): """Update user.""" if current_user.id != user_id: raise HTTPException(status_code=403, detail="Not authorized") user = await user_service.update_user(db, user_id, user_in) if not user: raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="User not found") return user @router.delete("/{user_id}", status_code=status.HTTP_204_NO_CONTENT) async def delete_user( user_id: int, db: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db), current_user: User = Depends(get_current_user) ): """Delete user.""" if current_user.id != user_id: raise HTTPException(status_code=403, detail="Not authorized") deleted = await user_service.repository.delete(db, user_id) if not deleted: raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="User not found") ``` ### Pattern 5: Authentication & Authorization ```python # core/security.py from datetime import datetime, timedelta from typing import Optional from jose import JWTError, jwt from passlib.context import CryptContext from app.core.config import get_settings settings = get_settings() pwd_context = CryptContext(schemes=["bcrypt"], deprecated="auto") ALGORITHM = "HS256" def create_access_token(data: dict, expires_delta: Optional[timedelta] = None): """Create JWT access token.""" to_encode = data.copy() if expires_delta: expire = datetime.utcnow() + expires_delta else: expire = datetime.utcnow() + timedelta(minutes=15) to_encode.update({"exp": expire}) encoded_jwt = jwt.encode(to_encode, settings.SECRET_KEY, algorithm=ALGORITHM) return encoded_jwt def verify_password(plain_password: str, hashed_password: str) -> bool: """Verify password against hash.""" return pwd_context.verify(plain_password, hashed_password) def get_password_hash(password: str) -> str: """Hash password.""" return pwd_context.hash(password) # api/dependencies.py from fastapi import Depends, HTTPException, status from fastapi.security import OAuth2PasswordBearer from jose import JWTError, jwt from sqlalchemy.ext.asyncio import AsyncSession from app.core.database import get_db from app.core.security import ALGORITHM from app.core.config import get_settings from app.repositories.user_repository import user_repository oauth2_scheme = OAuth2PasswordBearer(tokenUrl=f"{settings.API_V1_STR}/auth/login") async def get_current_user( db: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db), token: str = Depends(oauth2_scheme) ): """Get current authenticated user.""" credentials_exception = HTTPException( status_code=status.HTTP_401_UNAUTHORIZED, detail="Could not validate credentials", headers={"WWW-Authenticate": "Bearer"}, ) try: payload = jwt.decode(token, settings.SECRET_KEY, algorithms=[ALGORITHM]) user_id: int = payload.get("sub") if user_id is None: raise credentials_exception except JWTError: raise credentials_exception user = await user_repository.get(db, user_id) if user is None: raise credentials_exception return user ``` ## Testing ```python # tests/conftest.py import pytest import asyncio from httpx import AsyncClient from sqlalchemy.ext.asyncio import create_async_engine, AsyncSession from sqlalchemy.orm import sessionmaker from app.main import app from app.core.database import get_db, Base TEST_DATABASE_URL = "sqlite+aiosqlite:///:memory:" @pytest.fixture(scope="session") def event_loop(): loop = asyncio.get_event_loop_policy().new_event_loop() yield loop loop.close() @pytest.fixture async def db_session(): engine = create_async_engine(TEST_DATABASE_URL, echo=True) async with engine.begin() as conn: await conn.run_sync(Base.metadata.create_all) AsyncSessionLocal = sessionmaker( engine, class_=AsyncSession, expire_on_commit=False ) async with AsyncSessionLocal() as session: yield session @pytest.fixture async def client(db_session): async def override_get_db(): yield db_session app.dependency_overrides[get_db] = override_get_db async with AsyncClient(app=app, base_url="http://test") as client: yield client # tests/test_users.py import pytest @pytest.mark.asyncio async def test_create_user(client): response = await client.post( "/api/v1/users/", json={ "email": "test@example.com", "password": "testpass123", "name": "Test User" } ) assert response.status_code == 201 data = response.json() assert data["email"] == "test@example.com" assert "id" in data ``` ## Resources - **references/fastapi-architecture.md**: Detailed architecture guide - **references/async-best-practices.md**: Async/await patterns - **references/testing-strategies.md**: Comprehensive testing guide - **assets/project-template/**: Complete FastAPI project - **assets/docker-compose.yml**: Development environment setup ## Best Practices 1. **Async All The Way**: Use async for database, external APIs 2. **Dependency Injection**: Leverage FastAPI's DI system 3. **Repository Pattern**: Separate data access from business logic 4. **Service Layer**: Keep business logic out of routes 5. **Pydantic Schemas**: Strong typing for request/response 6. **Error Handling**: Consistent error responses 7. **Testing**: Test all layers independently ## Common Pitfalls - **Blocking Code in Async**: Using synchronous database drivers - **No Service Layer**: Business logic in route handlers - **Missing Type Hints**: Loses FastAPI's benefits - **Ignoring Sessions**: Not properly managing database sessions - **No Testing**: Skipping integration tests - **Tight Coupling**: Direct database access in routes
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

cost-optimization

Optimize cloud costs through resource rightsizing, tagging

architecture
⭐1
# Cloud Cost Optimization Strategies and patterns for optimizing cloud costs across AWS, Azure, and GCP. ## Purpose Implement systematic cost optimization strategies to reduce cloud spending while maintaining performance and reliability. ## When to Use - Reduce cloud spending - Right-size resources - Implement cost governance - Optimize multi-cloud costs - Meet budget constraints ## Cost Optimization Framework ### 1. Visibility - Implement cost allocation tags - Use cloud cost management tools - Set up budget alerts - Create cost dashboards ### 2. Right-Sizing - Analyze resource utilization - Downsize over-provisioned resources - Use auto-scaling - Remove idle resources ### 3. Pricing Models - Use reserved capacity - Leverage spot/preemptible instances - Implement savings plans - Use committed use discounts ### 4. Architecture Optimization - Use managed services - Implement caching - Optimize data transfer - Use lifecycle policies ## AWS Cost Optimization ### Reserved Instances ``` Savings: 30-72% vs On-Demand Term: 1 or 3 years Payment: All/Partial/No upfront Flexibility: Standard or Convertible ``` ### Savings Plans ``` Compute Savings Plans: 66% savings EC2 Instance Savings Plans: 72% savings Applies to: EC2, Fargate, Lambda Flexible across: Instance families, regions, OS ``` ### Spot Instances ``` Savings: Up to 90% vs On-Demand Best for: Batch jobs, CI/CD, stateless workloads Risk: 2-minute interruption notice Strategy: Mix with On-Demand for resilience ``` ### S3 Cost Optimization ```hcl resource "aws_s3_bucket_lifecycle_configuration" "example" { bucket = aws_s3_bucket.example.id rule { id = "transition-to-ia" status = "Enabled" transition { days = 30 storage_class = "STANDARD_IA" } transition { days = 90 storage_class = "GLACIER" } expiration { days = 365 } } } ``` ## Azure Cost Optimization ### Reserved VM Instances - 1 or 3 year terms - Up to 72% savings - Flexible sizing - Exchangeable ### Azure Hybrid Benefit - Use existing Windows Server licenses - Up to 80% savings with RI - Available for Windows and SQL Server ### Azure Advisor Recommendations - Right-size VMs - Delete unused resources - Use reserved capacity - Optimize storage ## GCP Cost Optimization ### Committed Use Discounts - 1 or 3 year commitment - Up to 57% savings - Applies to vCPUs and memory - Resource-based or spend-based ### Sustained Use Discounts - Automatic discounts - Up to 30% for running instances - No commitment required - Applies to Compute Engine, GKE ### Preemptible VMs - Up to 80% savings - 24-hour maximum runtime - Best for batch workloads ## Tagging Strategy ### AWS Tagging ```hcl locals { common_tags = { Environment = "production" Project = "my-project" CostCenter = "engineering" Owner = "team@example.com" ManagedBy = "terraform" } } resource "aws_instance" "example" { ami = "ami-12345678" instance_type = "t3.medium" tags = merge( local.common_tags, { Name = "web-server" } ) } ``` **Reference:** See `references/tagging-standards.md` ## Cost Monitoring ### Budget Alerts ```hcl # AWS Budget resource "aws_budgets_budget" "monthly" { name = "monthly-budget" budget_type = "COST" limit_amount = "1000" limit_unit = "USD" time_period_start = "2024-01-01_00:00" time_unit = "MONTHLY" notification { comparison_operator = "GREATER_THAN" threshold = 80 threshold_type = "PERCENTAGE" notification_type = "ACTUAL" subscriber_email_addresses = ["team@example.com"] } } ``` ### Cost Anomaly Detection - AWS Cost Anomaly Detection - Azure Cost Management alerts - GCP Budget alerts ## Architecture Patterns ### Pattern 1: Serverless First - Use Lambda/Functions for event-driven - Pay only for execution time - Auto-scaling included - No idle costs ### Pattern 2: Right-Sized Databases ``` Development: t3.small RDS Staging: t3.large RDS Production: r6g.2xlarge RDS with read replicas ``` ### Pattern 3: Multi-Tier Storage ``` Hot data: S3 Standard Warm data: S3 Standard-IA (30 days) Cold data: S3 Glacier (90 days) Archive: S3 Deep Archive (365 days) ``` ### Pattern 4: Auto-Scaling ```hcl resource "aws_autoscaling_policy" "scale_up" { name = "scale-up" scaling_adjustment = 2 adjustment_type = "ChangeInCapacity" cooldown = 300 autoscaling_group_name = aws_autoscaling_group.main.name } resource "aws_cloudwatch_metric_alarm" "cpu_high" { alarm_name = "cpu-high" comparison_operator = "GreaterThanThreshold" evaluation_periods = "2" metric_name = "CPUUtilization" namespace = "AWS/EC2" period = "60" statistic = "Average" threshold = "80" alarm_actions = [aws_autoscaling_policy.scale_up.arn] } ``` ## Cost Optimization Checklist - [ ] Implement cost allocation tags - [ ] Delete unused resources (EBS, EIPs, snapshots) - [ ] Right-size instances based on utilization - [ ] Use reserved capacity for steady workloads - [ ] Implement auto-scaling - [ ] Optimize storage classes - [ ] Use lifecycle policies - [ ] Enable cost anomaly detection - [ ] Set budget alerts - [ ] Review costs weekly - [ ] Use spot/preemptible instances - [ ] Optimize data transfer costs - [ ] Implement caching layers - [ ] Use managed services - [ ] Monitor and optimize continuously ## Tools - **AWS:** Cost Explorer, Cost Anomaly Detection, Compute Optimizer - **Azure:** Cost Management, Advisor - **GCP:** Cost Management, Recommender - **Multi-cloud:** CloudHealth, Cloudability, Kubecost ## Reference Files - `references/tagging-standards.md` - Tagging conventions - `assets/cost-analysis-template.xlsx` - Cost analysis spreadsheet ## Related Skills - `terraform-module-library` - For resource provisioning - `multi-cloud-architecture` - For cloud selection
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

secrets-management

Implement secure secrets management for CI/CD pipelines using

coding
⭐1
# Secrets Management Secure secrets management practices for CI/CD pipelines using Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, and other tools. ## Purpose Implement secure secrets management in CI/CD pipelines without hardcoding sensitive information. ## When to Use - Store API keys and credentials - Manage database passwords - Handle TLS certificates - Rotate secrets automatically - Implement least-privilege access ## Secrets Management Tools ### HashiCorp Vault - Centralized secrets management - Dynamic secrets generation - Secret rotation - Audit logging - Fine-grained access control ### AWS Secrets Manager - AWS-native solution - Automatic rotation - Integration with RDS - CloudFormation support ### Azure Key Vault - Azure-native solution - HSM-backed keys - Certificate management - RBAC integration ### Google Secret Manager - GCP-native solution - Versioning - IAM integration ## HashiCorp Vault Integration ### Setup Vault ```bash # Start Vault dev server vault server -dev # Set environment export VAULT_ADDR='http://127.0.0.1:8200' export VAULT_TOKEN='root' # Enable secrets engine vault secrets enable -path=secret kv-v2 # Store secret vault kv put secret/database/config username=admin password=secret ``` ### GitHub Actions with Vault ```yaml name: Deploy with Vault Secrets on: [push] jobs: deploy: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - name: Import Secrets from Vault uses: hashicorp/vault-action@v2 with: url: https://vault.example.com:8200 token: ${{ secrets.VAULT_TOKEN }} secrets: | secret/data/database username | DB_USERNAME ; secret/data/database password | DB_PASSWORD ; secret/data/api key | API_KEY - name: Use secrets run: | echo "Connecting to database as $DB_USERNAME" # Use $DB_PASSWORD, $API_KEY ``` ### GitLab CI with Vault ```yaml deploy: image: vault:latest before_script: - export VAULT_ADDR=https://vault.example.com:8200 - export VAULT_TOKEN=$VAULT_TOKEN - apk add curl jq script: - | DB_PASSWORD=$(vault kv get -field=password secret/database/config) API_KEY=$(vault kv get -field=key secret/api/credentials) echo "Deploying with secrets..." # Use $DB_PASSWORD, $API_KEY ``` **Reference:** See `references/vault-setup.md` ## AWS Secrets Manager ### Store Secret ```bash aws secretsmanager create-secret \ --name production/database/password \ --secret-string "super-secret-password" ``` ### Retrieve in GitHub Actions ```yaml - name: Configure AWS credentials uses: aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials@v4 with: aws-access-key-id: ${{ secrets.AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID }} aws-secret-access-key: ${{ secrets.AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY }} aws-region: us-west-2 - name: Get secret from AWS run: | SECRET=$(aws secretsmanager get-secret-value \ --secret-id production/database/password \ --query SecretString \ --output text) echo "::add-mask::$SECRET" echo "DB_PASSWORD=$SECRET" >> $GITHUB_ENV - name: Use secret run: | # Use $DB_PASSWORD ./deploy.sh ``` ### Terraform with AWS Secrets Manager ```hcl data "aws_secretsmanager_secret_version" "db_password" { secret_id = "production/database/password" } resource "aws_db_instance" "main" { allocated_storage = 100 engine = "postgres" instance_class = "db.t3.large" username = "admin" password = jsondecode(data.aws_secretsmanager_secret_version.db_password.secret_string)["password"] } ``` ## GitHub Secrets ### Organization/Repository Secrets ```yaml - name: Use GitHub secret run: | echo "API Key: ${{ secrets.API_KEY }}" echo "Database URL: ${{ secrets.DATABASE_URL }}" ``` ### Environment Secrets ```yaml deploy: runs-on: ubuntu-latest environment: production steps: - name: Deploy run: | echo "Deploying with ${{ secrets.PROD_API_KEY }}" ``` **Reference:** See `references/github-secrets.md` ## GitLab CI/CD Variables ### Project Variables ```yaml deploy: script: - echo "Deploying with $API_KEY" - echo "Database: $DATABASE_URL" ``` ### Protected and Masked Variables - Protected: Only available in protected branches - Masked: Hidden in job logs - File type: Stored as file ## Best Practices 1. **Never commit secrets** to Git 2. **Use different secrets** per environment 3. **Rotate secrets regularly** 4. **Implement least-privilege access** 5. **Enable audit logging** 6. **Use secret scanning** (GitGuardian, TruffleHog) 7. **Mask secrets in logs** 8. **Encrypt secrets at rest** 9. **Use short-lived tokens** when possible 10. **Document secret requirements** ## Secret Rotation ### Automated Rotation with AWS ```python import boto3 import json def lambda_handler(event, context): client = boto3.client('secretsmanager') # Get current secret response = client.get_secret_value(SecretId='my-secret') current_secret = json.loads(response['SecretString']) # Generate new password new_password = generate_strong_password() # Update database password update_database_password(new_password) # Update secret client.put_secret_value( SecretId='my-secret', SecretString=json.dumps({ 'username': current_secret['username'], 'password': new_password }) ) return {'statusCode': 200} ``` ### Manual Rotation Process 1. Generate new secret 2. Update secret in secret store 3. Update applications to use new secret 4. Verify functionality 5. Revoke old secret ## External Secrets Operator ### Kubernetes Integration ```yaml apiVersion: external-secrets.io/v1beta1 kind: SecretStore metadata: name: vault-backend namespace: production spec: provider: vault: server: "https://vault.example.com:8200" path: "secret" version: "v2" auth: kubernetes: mountPath: "kubernetes" role: "production" --- apiVersion: external-secrets.io/v1beta1 kind: ExternalSecret metadata: name: database-credentials namespace: production spec: refreshInterval: 1h secretStoreRef: name: vault-backend kind: SecretStore target: name: database-credentials creationPolicy: Owner data: - secretKey: username remoteRef: key: database/config property: username - secretKey: password remoteRef: key: database/config property: password ``` ## Secret Scanning ### Pre-commit Hook ```bash #!/bin/bash # .git/hooks/pre-commit # Check for secrets with TruffleHog docker run --rm -v "$(pwd):/repo" \ trufflesecurity/trufflehog:latest \ filesystem --directory=/repo if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then echo "❌ Secret detected! Commit blocked." exit 1 fi ``` ### CI/CD Secret Scanning ```yaml secret-scan: stage: security image: trufflesecurity/trufflehog:latest script: - trufflehog filesystem . allow_failure: false ``` ## Reference Files - `references/vault-setup.md` - HashiCorp Vault configuration - `references/github-secrets.md` - GitHub Secrets best practices ## Related Skills - `github-actions-templates` - For GitHub Actions integration - `gitlab-ci-patterns` - For GitLab CI integration - `deployment-pipeline-design` - For pipeline architecture
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

hybrid-cloud-networking

Configure secure, high-performance connectivity between on-premises

architecture
⭐1
# Hybrid Cloud Networking Configure secure, high-performance connectivity between on-premises and cloud environments using VPN, Direct Connect, and ExpressRoute. ## Purpose Establish secure, reliable network connectivity between on-premises data centers and cloud providers (AWS, Azure, GCP). ## When to Use - Connect on-premises to cloud - Extend datacenter to cloud - Implement hybrid active-active setups - Meet compliance requirements - Migrate to cloud gradually ## Connection Options ### AWS Connectivity #### 1. Site-to-Site VPN - IPSec VPN over internet - Up to 1.25 Gbps per tunnel - Cost-effective for moderate bandwidth - Higher latency, internet-dependent ```hcl resource "aws_vpn_gateway" "main" { vpc_id = aws_vpc.main.id tags = { Name = "main-vpn-gateway" } } resource "aws_customer_gateway" "main" { bgp_asn = 65000 ip_address = "203.0.113.1" type = "ipsec.1" } resource "aws_vpn_connection" "main" { vpn_gateway_id = aws_vpn_gateway.main.id customer_gateway_id = aws_customer_gateway.main.id type = "ipsec.1" static_routes_only = false } ``` #### 2. AWS Direct Connect - Dedicated network connection - 1 Gbps to 100 Gbps - Lower latency, consistent bandwidth - More expensive, setup time required **Reference:** See `references/direct-connect.md` ### Azure Connectivity #### 1. Site-to-Site VPN ```hcl resource "azurerm_virtual_network_gateway" "vpn" { name = "vpn-gateway" location = azurerm_resource_group.main.location resource_group_name = azurerm_resource_group.main.name type = "Vpn" vpn_type = "RouteBased" sku = "VpnGw1" ip_configuration { name = "vnetGatewayConfig" public_ip_address_id = azurerm_public_ip.vpn.id private_ip_address_allocation = "Dynamic" subnet_id = azurerm_subnet.gateway.id } } ``` #### 2. Azure ExpressRoute - Private connection via connectivity provider - Up to 100 Gbps - Low latency, high reliability - Premium for global connectivity ### GCP Connectivity #### 1. Cloud VPN - IPSec VPN (Classic or HA VPN) - HA VPN: 99.99% SLA - Up to 3 Gbps per tunnel #### 2. Cloud Interconnect - Dedicated (10 Gbps, 100 Gbps) - Partner (50 Mbps to 50 Gbps) - Lower latency than VPN ## Hybrid Network Patterns ### Pattern 1: Hub-and-Spoke ``` On-Premises Datacenter ↓ VPN/Direct Connect ↓ Transit Gateway (AWS) / vWAN (Azure) ↓ β”œβ”€ Production VPC/VNet β”œβ”€ Staging VPC/VNet └─ Development VPC/VNet ``` ### Pattern 2: Multi-Region Hybrid ``` On-Premises β”œβ”€ Direct Connect β†’ us-east-1 └─ Direct Connect β†’ us-west-2 ↓ Cross-Region Peering ``` ### Pattern 3: Multi-Cloud Hybrid ``` On-Premises Datacenter β”œβ”€ Direct Connect β†’ AWS β”œβ”€ ExpressRoute β†’ Azure └─ Interconnect β†’ GCP ``` ## Routing Configuration ### BGP Configuration ``` On-Premises Router: - AS Number: 65000 - Advertise: 10.0.0.0/8 Cloud Router: - AS Number: 64512 (AWS), 65515 (Azure) - Advertise: Cloud VPC/VNet CIDRs ``` ### Route Propagation - Enable route propagation on route tables - Use BGP for dynamic routing - Implement route filtering - Monitor route advertisements ## Security Best Practices 1. **Use private connectivity** (Direct Connect/ExpressRoute) 2. **Implement encryption** for VPN tunnels 3. **Use VPC endpoints** to avoid internet routing 4. **Configure network ACLs** and security groups 5. **Enable VPC Flow Logs** for monitoring 6. **Implement DDoS protection** 7. **Use PrivateLink/Private Endpoints** 8. **Monitor connections** with CloudWatch/Monitor 9. **Implement redundancy** (dual tunnels) 10. **Regular security audits** ## High Availability ### Dual VPN Tunnels ```hcl resource "aws_vpn_connection" "primary" { vpn_gateway_id = aws_vpn_gateway.main.id customer_gateway_id = aws_customer_gateway.primary.id type = "ipsec.1" } resource "aws_vpn_connection" "secondary" { vpn_gateway_id = aws_vpn_gateway.main.id customer_gateway_id = aws_customer_gateway.secondary.id type = "ipsec.1" } ``` ### Active-Active Configuration - Multiple connections from different locations - BGP for automatic failover - Equal-cost multi-path (ECMP) routing - Monitor health of all connections ## Monitoring and Troubleshooting ### Key Metrics - Tunnel status (up/down) - Bytes in/out - Packet loss - Latency - BGP session status ### Troubleshooting ```bash # AWS VPN aws ec2 describe-vpn-connections aws ec2 get-vpn-connection-telemetry # Azure VPN az network vpn-connection show az network vpn-connection show-device-config-script ``` ## Cost Optimization 1. **Right-size connections** based on traffic 2. **Use VPN for low-bandwidth** workloads 3. **Consolidate traffic** through fewer connections 4. **Minimize data transfer** costs 5. **Use Direct Connect** for high bandwidth 6. **Implement caching** to reduce traffic ## Reference Files - `references/vpn-setup.md` - VPN configuration guide - `references/direct-connect.md` - Direct Connect setup ## Related Skills - `multi-cloud-architecture` - For architecture decisions - `terraform-module-library` - For IaC implementation
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

istio-traffic-management

Configure Istio traffic management including routing, load

architecture
⭐1
# Istio Traffic Management Comprehensive guide to Istio traffic management for production service mesh deployments. ## When to Use This Skill - Configuring service-to-service routing - Implementing canary or blue-green deployments - Setting up circuit breakers and retries - Load balancing configuration - Traffic mirroring for testing - Fault injection for chaos engineering ## Core Concepts ### 1. Traffic Management Resources | Resource | Purpose | Scope | | ------------------- | ----------------------------- | ------------- | | **VirtualService** | Route traffic to destinations | Host-based | | **DestinationRule** | Define policies after routing | Service-based | | **Gateway** | Configure ingress/egress | Cluster edge | | **ServiceEntry** | Add external services | Mesh-wide | ### 2. Traffic Flow ``` Client β†’ Gateway β†’ VirtualService β†’ DestinationRule β†’ Service (routing) (policies) (pods) ``` ## Templates ### Template 1: Basic Routing ```yaml apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: VirtualService metadata: name: reviews-route namespace: bookinfo spec: hosts: - reviews http: - match: - headers: end-user: exact: jason route: - destination: host: reviews subset: v2 - route: - destination: host: reviews subset: v1 --- apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: DestinationRule metadata: name: reviews-destination namespace: bookinfo spec: host: reviews subsets: - name: v1 labels: version: v1 - name: v2 labels: version: v2 - name: v3 labels: version: v3 ``` ### Template 2: Canary Deployment ```yaml apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: VirtualService metadata: name: my-service-canary spec: hosts: - my-service http: - route: - destination: host: my-service subset: stable weight: 90 - destination: host: my-service subset: canary weight: 10 --- apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: DestinationRule metadata: name: my-service-dr spec: host: my-service trafficPolicy: connectionPool: tcp: maxConnections: 100 http: h2UpgradePolicy: UPGRADE http1MaxPendingRequests: 100 http2MaxRequests: 1000 subsets: - name: stable labels: version: stable - name: canary labels: version: canary ``` ### Template 3: Circuit Breaker ```yaml apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: DestinationRule metadata: name: circuit-breaker spec: host: my-service trafficPolicy: connectionPool: tcp: maxConnections: 100 http: http1MaxPendingRequests: 100 http2MaxRequests: 1000 maxRequestsPerConnection: 10 maxRetries: 3 outlierDetection: consecutive5xxErrors: 5 interval: 30s baseEjectionTime: 30s maxEjectionPercent: 50 minHealthPercent: 30 ``` ### Template 4: Retry and Timeout ```yaml apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: VirtualService metadata: name: ratings-retry spec: hosts: - ratings http: - route: - destination: host: ratings timeout: 10s retries: attempts: 3 perTryTimeout: 3s retryOn: connect-failure,refused-stream,unavailable,cancelled,retriable-4xx,503 retryRemoteLocalities: true ``` ### Template 5: Traffic Mirroring ```yaml apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: VirtualService metadata: name: mirror-traffic spec: hosts: - my-service http: - route: - destination: host: my-service subset: v1 mirror: host: my-service subset: v2 mirrorPercentage: value: 100.0 ``` ### Template 6: Fault Injection ```yaml apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: VirtualService metadata: name: fault-injection spec: hosts: - ratings http: - fault: delay: percentage: value: 10 fixedDelay: 5s abort: percentage: value: 5 httpStatus: 503 route: - destination: host: ratings ``` ### Template 7: Ingress Gateway ```yaml apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: Gateway metadata: name: my-gateway spec: selector: istio: ingressgateway servers: - port: number: 443 name: https protocol: HTTPS tls: mode: SIMPLE credentialName: my-tls-secret hosts: - "*.example.com" --- apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: VirtualService metadata: name: my-vs spec: hosts: - "api.example.com" gateways: - my-gateway http: - match: - uri: prefix: /api/v1 route: - destination: host: api-service port: number: 8080 ``` ## Load Balancing Strategies ```yaml apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: DestinationRule metadata: name: load-balancing spec: host: my-service trafficPolicy: loadBalancer: simple: ROUND_ROBIN # or LEAST_CONN, RANDOM, PASSTHROUGH --- # Consistent hashing for sticky sessions apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: DestinationRule metadata: name: sticky-sessions spec: host: my-service trafficPolicy: loadBalancer: consistentHash: httpHeaderName: x-user-id # or: httpCookie, useSourceIp, httpQueryParameterName ``` ## Best Practices ### Do's - **Start simple** - Add complexity incrementally - **Use subsets** - Version your services clearly - **Set timeouts** - Always configure reasonable timeouts - **Enable retries** - But with backoff and limits - **Monitor** - Use Kiali and Jaeger for visibility ### Don'ts - **Don't over-retry** - Can cause cascading failures - **Don't ignore outlier detection** - Enable circuit breakers - **Don't mirror to production** - Mirror to test environments - **Don't skip canary** - Test with small traffic percentage first ## Debugging Commands ```bash # Check VirtualService configuration istioctl analyze # View effective routes istioctl proxy-config routes deploy/my-app -o json # Check endpoint discovery istioctl proxy-config endpoints deploy/my-app # Debug traffic istioctl proxy-config log deploy/my-app --level debug ``` ## Resources - [Istio Traffic Management](https://istio.io/latest/docs/concepts/traffic-management/) - [Virtual Service Reference](https://istio.io/latest/docs/reference/config/networking/virtual-service/) - [Destination Rule Reference](https://istio.io/latest/docs/reference/config/networking/destination-rule/)
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

linkerd-patterns

Implement Linkerd service mesh patterns for lightweight,

architecture
⭐1
# Linkerd Patterns Production patterns for Linkerd service mesh - the lightweight, security-first service mesh for Kubernetes. ## When to Use This Skill - Setting up a lightweight service mesh - Implementing automatic mTLS - Configuring traffic splits for canary deployments - Setting up service profiles for per-route metrics - Implementing retries and timeouts - Multi-cluster service mesh ## Core Concepts ### 1. Linkerd Architecture ``` β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ Control Plane β”‚ β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ destiny β”‚ β”‚ identity β”‚ β”‚ proxy-inject β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ Data Plane β”‚ β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ β”‚ β”‚proxy│────│proxy│────│proxyβ”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β” β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ app β”‚ β”‚ app β”‚ β”‚ app β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ ``` ### 2. Key Resources | Resource | Purpose | | ----------------------- | ------------------------------------ | | **ServiceProfile** | Per-route metrics, retries, timeouts | | **TrafficSplit** | Canary deployments, A/B testing | | **Server** | Define server-side policies | | **ServerAuthorization** | Access control policies | ## Templates ### Template 1: Mesh Installation ```bash # Install CLI curl --proto '=https' --tlsv1.2 -sSfL https://run.linkerd.io/install | sh # Validate cluster linkerd check --pre # Install CRDs linkerd install --crds | kubectl apply -f - # Install control plane linkerd install | kubectl apply -f - # Verify installation linkerd check # Install viz extension (optional) linkerd viz install | kubectl apply -f - ``` ### Template 2: Inject Namespace ```yaml # Automatic injection for namespace apiVersion: v1 kind: Namespace metadata: name: my-app annotations: linkerd.io/inject: enabled --- # Or inject specific deployment apiVersion: apps/v1 kind: Deployment metadata: name: my-app annotations: linkerd.io/inject: enabled spec: template: metadata: annotations: linkerd.io/inject: enabled ``` ### Template 3: Service Profile with Retries ```yaml apiVersion: linkerd.io/v1alpha2 kind: ServiceProfile metadata: name: my-service.my-namespace.svc.cluster.local namespace: my-namespace spec: routes: - name: GET /api/users condition: method: GET pathRegex: /api/users responseClasses: - condition: status: min: 500 max: 599 isFailure: true isRetryable: true - name: POST /api/users condition: method: POST pathRegex: /api/users # POST not retryable by default isRetryable: false - name: GET /api/users/{id} condition: method: GET pathRegex: /api/users/[^/]+ timeout: 5s isRetryable: true retryBudget: retryRatio: 0.2 minRetriesPerSecond: 10 ttl: 10s ``` ### Template 4: Traffic Split (Canary) ```yaml apiVersion: split.smi-spec.io/v1alpha1 kind: TrafficSplit metadata: name: my-service-canary namespace: my-namespace spec: service: my-service backends: - service: my-service-stable weight: 900m # 90% - service: my-service-canary weight: 100m # 10% ``` ### Template 5: Server Authorization Policy ```yaml # Define the server apiVersion: policy.linkerd.io/v1beta1 kind: Server metadata: name: my-service-http namespace: my-namespace spec: podSelector: matchLabels: app: my-service port: http proxyProtocol: HTTP/1 --- # Allow traffic from specific clients apiVersion: policy.linkerd.io/v1beta1 kind: ServerAuthorization metadata: name: allow-frontend namespace: my-namespace spec: server: name: my-service-http client: meshTLS: serviceAccounts: - name: frontend namespace: my-namespace --- # Allow unauthenticated traffic (e.g., from ingress) apiVersion: policy.linkerd.io/v1beta1 kind: ServerAuthorization metadata: name: allow-ingress namespace: my-namespace spec: server: name: my-service-http client: unauthenticated: true networks: - cidr: 10.0.0.0/8 ``` ### Template 6: HTTPRoute for Advanced Routing ```yaml apiVersion: policy.linkerd.io/v1beta2 kind: HTTPRoute metadata: name: my-route namespace: my-namespace spec: parentRefs: - name: my-service kind: Service group: core port: 8080 rules: - matches: - path: type: PathPrefix value: /api/v2 - headers: - name: x-api-version value: v2 backendRefs: - name: my-service-v2 port: 8080 - matches: - path: type: PathPrefix value: /api backendRefs: - name: my-service-v1 port: 8080 ``` ### Template 7: Multi-cluster Setup ```bash # On each cluster, install with cluster credentials linkerd multicluster install | kubectl apply -f - # Link clusters linkerd multicluster link --cluster-name west \ --api-server-address https://west.example.com:6443 \ | kubectl apply -f - # Export a service to other clusters kubectl label svc/my-service mirror.linkerd.io/exported=true # Verify cross-cluster connectivity linkerd multicluster check linkerd multicluster gateways ``` ## Monitoring Commands ```bash # Live traffic view linkerd viz top deploy/my-app # Per-route metrics linkerd viz routes deploy/my-app # Check proxy status linkerd viz stat deploy -n my-namespace # View service dependencies linkerd viz edges deploy -n my-namespace # Dashboard linkerd viz dashboard ``` ## Debugging ```bash # Check injection status linkerd check --proxy -n my-namespace # View proxy logs kubectl logs deploy/my-app -c linkerd-proxy # Debug identity/TLS linkerd identity -n my-namespace # Tap traffic (live) linkerd viz tap deploy/my-app --to deploy/my-backend ``` ## Best Practices ### Do's - **Enable mTLS everywhere** - It's automatic with Linkerd - **Use ServiceProfiles** - Get per-route metrics and retries - **Set retry budgets** - Prevent retry storms - **Monitor golden metrics** - Success rate, latency, throughput ### Don'ts - **Don't skip check** - Always run `linkerd check` after changes - **Don't over-configure** - Linkerd defaults are sensible - **Don't ignore ServiceProfiles** - They unlock advanced features - **Don't forget timeouts** - Set appropriate values per route ## Resources - [Linkerd Documentation](https://linkerd.io/2.14/overview/) - [Service Profiles](https://linkerd.io/2.14/features/service-profiles/) - [Authorization Policy](https://linkerd.io/2.14/features/server-policy/)
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

mtls-configuration

Configure mutual TLS (mTLS) for zero-trust service-to-service

architecture
⭐1
# mTLS Configuration Comprehensive guide to implementing mutual TLS for zero-trust service mesh communication. ## When to Use This Skill - Implementing zero-trust networking - Securing service-to-service communication - Certificate rotation and management - Debugging TLS handshake issues - Compliance requirements (PCI-DSS, HIPAA) - Multi-cluster secure communication ## Core Concepts ### 1. mTLS Flow ``` β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ Service β”‚ β”‚ Service β”‚ β”‚ A β”‚ β”‚ B β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚ β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β” TLS Handshake β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ Proxy │◄───────────────────────────►│ Proxy β”‚ β”‚(Sidecar)β”‚ 1. ClientHello β”‚(Sidecar)β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ 2. ServerHello + Cert β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ 3. Client Cert β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ 4. Verify Both Certs β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ 5. Encrypted Channel β”‚ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ ``` ### 2. Certificate Hierarchy ``` Root CA (Self-signed, long-lived) β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ Intermediate CA (Cluster-level) β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ Workload Cert (Service A) β”‚ └── Workload Cert (Service B) β”‚ └── Intermediate CA (Multi-cluster) β”‚ └── Cross-cluster certs ``` ## Templates ### Template 1: Istio mTLS (Strict Mode) ```yaml # Enable strict mTLS mesh-wide apiVersion: security.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: PeerAuthentication metadata: name: default namespace: istio-system spec: mtls: mode: STRICT --- # Namespace-level override (permissive for migration) apiVersion: security.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: PeerAuthentication metadata: name: default namespace: legacy-namespace spec: mtls: mode: PERMISSIVE --- # Workload-specific policy apiVersion: security.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: PeerAuthentication metadata: name: payment-service namespace: production spec: selector: matchLabels: app: payment-service mtls: mode: STRICT portLevelMtls: 8080: mode: STRICT 9090: mode: DISABLE # Metrics port, no mTLS ``` ### Template 2: Istio Destination Rule for mTLS ```yaml apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: DestinationRule metadata: name: default namespace: istio-system spec: host: "*.local" trafficPolicy: tls: mode: ISTIO_MUTUAL --- # TLS to external service apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: DestinationRule metadata: name: external-api spec: host: api.external.com trafficPolicy: tls: mode: SIMPLE caCertificates: /etc/certs/external-ca.pem --- # Mutual TLS to external service apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: DestinationRule metadata: name: partner-api spec: host: api.partner.com trafficPolicy: tls: mode: MUTUAL clientCertificate: /etc/certs/client.pem privateKey: /etc/certs/client-key.pem caCertificates: /etc/certs/partner-ca.pem ``` ### Template 3: Cert-Manager with Istio ```yaml # Install cert-manager issuer for Istio apiVersion: cert-manager.io/v1 kind: ClusterIssuer metadata: name: istio-ca spec: ca: secretName: istio-ca-secret --- # Create Istio CA secret apiVersion: v1 kind: Secret metadata: name: istio-ca-secret namespace: cert-manager type: kubernetes.io/tls data: tls.crt: <base64-encoded-ca-cert> tls.key: <base64-encoded-ca-key> --- # Certificate for workload apiVersion: cert-manager.io/v1 kind: Certificate metadata: name: my-service-cert namespace: my-namespace spec: secretName: my-service-tls duration: 24h renewBefore: 8h issuerRef: name: istio-ca kind: ClusterIssuer commonName: my-service.my-namespace.svc.cluster.local dnsNames: - my-service - my-service.my-namespace - my-service.my-namespace.svc - my-service.my-namespace.svc.cluster.local usages: - server auth - client auth ``` ### Template 4: SPIFFE/SPIRE Integration ```yaml # SPIRE Server configuration apiVersion: v1 kind: ConfigMap metadata: name: spire-server namespace: spire data: server.conf: | server { bind_address = "0.0.0.0" bind_port = "8081" trust_domain = "example.org" data_dir = "/run/spire/data" log_level = "INFO" ca_ttl = "168h" default_x509_svid_ttl = "1h" } plugins { DataStore "sql" { plugin_data { database_type = "sqlite3" connection_string = "/run/spire/data/datastore.sqlite3" } } NodeAttestor "k8s_psat" { plugin_data { clusters = { "demo-cluster" = { service_account_allow_list = ["spire:spire-agent"] } } } } KeyManager "memory" { plugin_data {} } UpstreamAuthority "disk" { plugin_data { key_file_path = "/run/spire/secrets/bootstrap.key" cert_file_path = "/run/spire/secrets/bootstrap.crt" } } } --- # SPIRE Agent DaemonSet (abbreviated) apiVersion: apps/v1 kind: DaemonSet metadata: name: spire-agent namespace: spire spec: selector: matchLabels: app: spire-agent template: spec: containers: - name: spire-agent image: ghcr.io/spiffe/spire-agent:1.8.0 volumeMounts: - name: spire-agent-socket mountPath: /run/spire/sockets volumes: - name: spire-agent-socket hostPath: path: /run/spire/sockets type: DirectoryOrCreate ``` ### Template 5: Linkerd mTLS (Automatic) ```yaml # Linkerd enables mTLS automatically # Verify with: # linkerd viz edges deployment -n my-namespace # For external services without mTLS apiVersion: policy.linkerd.io/v1beta1 kind: Server metadata: name: external-api namespace: my-namespace spec: podSelector: matchLabels: app: my-app port: external-api proxyProtocol: HTTP/1 # or TLS for passthrough --- # Skip TLS for specific port apiVersion: v1 kind: Service metadata: name: my-service annotations: config.linkerd.io/skip-outbound-ports: "3306" # MySQL ``` ## Certificate Rotation ```bash # Istio - Check certificate expiry istioctl proxy-config secret deploy/my-app -o json | \ jq '.dynamicActiveSecrets[0].secret.tlsCertificate.certificateChain.inlineBytes' | \ tr -d '"' | base64 -d | openssl x509 -text -noout # Force certificate rotation kubectl rollout restart deployment/my-app # Check Linkerd identity linkerd identity -n my-namespace ``` ## Debugging mTLS Issues ```bash # Istio - Check if mTLS is enabled istioctl authn tls-check my-service.my-namespace.svc.cluster.local # Verify peer authentication kubectl get peerauthentication --all-namespaces # Check destination rules kubectl get destinationrule --all-namespaces # Debug TLS handshake istioctl proxy-config log deploy/my-app --level debug kubectl logs deploy/my-app -c istio-proxy | grep -i tls # Linkerd - Check mTLS status linkerd viz edges deployment -n my-namespace linkerd viz tap deploy/my-app --to deploy/my-backend ``` ## Best Practices ### Do's - **Start with PERMISSIVE** - Migrate gradually to STRICT - **Monitor certificate expiry** - Set up alerts - **Use short-lived certs** - 24h or less for workloads - **Rotate CA periodically** - Plan for CA rotation - **Log TLS errors** - For debugging and audit ### Don'ts - **Don't disable mTLS** - For convenience in production - **Don't ignore cert expiry** - Automate rotation - **Don't use self-signed certs** - Use proper CA hierarchy - **Don't skip verification** - Verify the full chain ## Resources - [Istio Security](https://istio.io/latest/docs/concepts/security/) - [SPIFFE/SPIRE](https://spiffe.io/) - [cert-manager](https://cert-manager.io/) - [Zero Trust Architecture (NIST)](https://www.nist.gov/publications/zero-trust-architecture)
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

workflow-orchestration-patterns

Design durable workflows with Temporal for distributed systems.

coding
⭐1
# Workflow Orchestration Patterns Master workflow orchestration architecture with Temporal, covering fundamental design decisions, resilience patterns, and best practices for building reliable distributed systems. ## When to Use Workflow Orchestration ### Ideal Use Cases (Source: docs.temporal.io) - **Multi-step processes** spanning machines/services/databases - **Distributed transactions** requiring all-or-nothing semantics - **Long-running workflows** (hours to years) with automatic state persistence - **Failure recovery** that must resume from last successful step - **Business processes**: bookings, orders, campaigns, approvals - **Entity lifecycle management**: inventory tracking, account management, cart workflows - **Infrastructure automation**: CI/CD pipelines, provisioning, deployments - **Human-in-the-loop** systems requiring timeouts and escalations ### When NOT to Use - Simple CRUD operations (use direct API calls) - Pure data processing pipelines (use Airflow, batch processing) - Stateless request/response (use standard APIs) - Real-time streaming (use Kafka, event processors) ## Critical Design Decision: Workflows vs Activities **The Fundamental Rule** (Source: temporal.io/blog/workflow-engine-principles): - **Workflows** = Orchestration logic and decision-making - **Activities** = External interactions (APIs, databases, network calls) ### Workflows (Orchestration) **Characteristics:** - Contain business logic and coordination - **MUST be deterministic** (same inputs β†’ same outputs) - **Cannot** perform direct external calls - State automatically preserved across failures - Can run for years despite infrastructure failures **Example workflow tasks:** - Decide which steps to execute - Handle compensation logic - Manage timeouts and retries - Coordinate child workflows ### Activities (External Interactions) **Characteristics:** - Handle all external system interactions - Can be non-deterministic (API calls, DB writes) - Include built-in timeouts and retry logic - **Must be idempotent** (calling N times = calling once) - Short-lived (seconds to minutes typically) **Example activity tasks:** - Call payment gateway API - Write to database - Send emails or notifications - Query external services ### Design Decision Framework ``` Does it touch external systems? β†’ Activity Is it orchestration/decision logic? β†’ Workflow ``` ## Core Workflow Patterns ### 1. Saga Pattern with Compensation **Purpose**: Implement distributed transactions with rollback capability **Pattern** (Source: temporal.io/blog/compensating-actions-part-of-a-complete-breakfast-with-sagas): ``` For each step: 1. Register compensation BEFORE executing 2. Execute the step (via activity) 3. On failure, run all compensations in reverse order (LIFO) ``` **Example: Payment Workflow** 1. Reserve inventory (compensation: release inventory) 2. Charge payment (compensation: refund payment) 3. Fulfill order (compensation: cancel fulfillment) **Critical Requirements:** - Compensations must be idempotent - Register compensation BEFORE executing step - Run compensations in reverse order - Handle partial failures gracefully ### 2. Entity Workflows (Actor Model) **Purpose**: Long-lived workflow representing single entity instance **Pattern** (Source: docs.temporal.io/evaluate/use-cases-design-patterns): - One workflow execution = one entity (cart, account, inventory item) - Workflow persists for entity lifetime - Receives signals for state changes - Supports queries for current state **Example Use Cases:** - Shopping cart (add items, checkout, expiration) - Bank account (deposits, withdrawals, balance checks) - Product inventory (stock updates, reservations) **Benefits:** - Encapsulates entity behavior - Guarantees consistency per entity - Natural event sourcing ### 3. Fan-Out/Fan-In (Parallel Execution) **Purpose**: Execute multiple tasks in parallel, aggregate results **Pattern:** - Spawn child workflows or parallel activities - Wait for all to complete - Aggregate results - Handle partial failures **Scaling Rule** (Source: temporal.io/blog/workflow-engine-principles): - Don't scale individual workflows - For 1M tasks: spawn 1K child workflows Γ— 1K tasks each - Keep each workflow bounded ### 4. Async Callback Pattern **Purpose**: Wait for external event or human approval **Pattern:** - Workflow sends request and waits for signal - External system processes asynchronously - Sends signal to resume workflow - Workflow continues with response **Use Cases:** - Human approval workflows - Webhook callbacks - Long-running external processes ## State Management and Determinism ### Automatic State Preservation **How Temporal Works** (Source: docs.temporal.io/workflows): - Complete program state preserved automatically - Event History records every command and event - Seamless recovery from crashes - Applications restore pre-failure state ### Determinism Constraints **Workflows Execute as State Machines**: - Replay behavior must be consistent - Same inputs β†’ identical outputs every time **Prohibited in Workflows** (Source: docs.temporal.io/workflows): - ❌ Threading, locks, synchronization primitives - ❌ Random number generation (`random()`) - ❌ Global state or static variables - ❌ System time (`datetime.now()`) - ❌ Direct file I/O or network calls - ❌ Non-deterministic libraries **Allowed in Workflows**: - βœ… `workflow.now()` (deterministic time) - βœ… `workflow.random()` (deterministic random) - βœ… Pure functions and calculations - βœ… Calling activities (non-deterministic operations) ### Versioning Strategies **Challenge**: Changing workflow code while old executions still running **Solutions**: 1. **Versioning API**: Use `workflow.get_version()` for safe changes 2. **New Workflow Type**: Create new workflow, route new executions to it 3. **Backward Compatibility**: Ensure old events replay correctly ## Resilience and Error Handling ### Retry Policies **Default Behavior**: Temporal retries activities forever **Configure Retry**: - Initial retry interval - Backoff coefficient (exponential backoff) - Maximum interval (cap retry delay) - Maximum attempts (eventually fail) **Non-Retryable Errors**: - Invalid input (validation failures) - Business rule violations - Permanent failures (resource not found) ### Idempotency Requirements **Why Critical** (Source: docs.temporal.io/activities): - Activities may execute multiple times - Network failures trigger retries - Duplicate execution must be safe **Implementation Strategies**: - Idempotency keys (deduplication) - Check-then-act with unique constraints - Upsert operations instead of insert - Track processed request IDs ### Activity Heartbeats **Purpose**: Detect stalled long-running activities **Pattern**: - Activity sends periodic heartbeat - Includes progress information - Timeout if no heartbeat received - Enables progress-based retry ## Best Practices ### Workflow Design 1. **Keep workflows focused** - Single responsibility per workflow 2. **Small workflows** - Use child workflows for scalability 3. **Clear boundaries** - Workflow orchestrates, activities execute 4. **Test locally** - Use time-skipping test environment ### Activity Design 1. **Idempotent operations** - Safe to retry 2. **Short-lived** - Seconds to minutes, not hours 3. **Timeout configuration** - Always set timeouts 4. **Heartbeat for long tasks** - Report progress 5. **Error handling** - Distinguish retryable vs non-retryable ### Common Pitfalls **Workflow Violations**: - Using `datetime.now()` instead of `workflow.now()` - Threading or async operations in workflow code - Calling external APIs directly from workflow - Non-deterministic logic in workflows **Activity Mistakes**: - Non-idempotent operations (can't handle retries) - Missing timeouts (activities run forever) - No error classification (retry validation errors) - Ignoring payload limits (2MB per argument) ### Operational Considerations **Monitoring**: - Workflow execution duration - Activity failure rates - Retry attempts and backoff - Pending workflow counts **Scalability**: - Horizontal scaling with workers - Task queue partitioning - Child workflow decomposition - Activity batching when appropriate ## Additional Resources **Official Documentation**: - Temporal Core Concepts: docs.temporal.io/workflows - Workflow Patterns: docs.temporal.io/evaluate/use-cases-design-patterns - Best Practices: docs.temporal.io/develop/best-practices - Saga Pattern: temporal.io/blog/saga-pattern-made-easy **Key Principles**: 1. Workflows = orchestration, Activities = external calls 2. Determinism is non-negotiable for workflows 3. Idempotency is critical for activities 4. State preservation is automatic 5. Design for failure and recovery
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

airflow-dag-patterns

Build production Apache Airflow DAGs with best practices for

data
⭐1
# Apache Airflow DAG Patterns Production-ready patterns for Apache Airflow including DAG design, operators, sensors, testing, and deployment strategies. ## When to Use This Skill - Creating data pipeline orchestration with Airflow - Designing DAG structures and dependencies - Implementing custom operators and sensors - Testing Airflow DAGs locally - Setting up Airflow in production - Debugging failed DAG runs ## Core Concepts ### 1. DAG Design Principles | Principle | Description | | --------------- | ----------------------------------- | | **Idempotent** | Running twice produces same result | | **Atomic** | Tasks succeed or fail completely | | **Incremental** | Process only new/changed data | | **Observable** | Logs, metrics, alerts at every step | ### 2. Task Dependencies ```python # Linear task1 >> task2 >> task3 # Fan-out task1 >> [task2, task3, task4] # Fan-in [task1, task2, task3] >> task4 # Complex task1 >> task2 >> task4 task1 >> task3 >> task4 ``` ## Quick Start ```python # dags/example_dag.py from datetime import datetime, timedelta from airflow import DAG from airflow.operators.python import PythonOperator from airflow.operators.empty import EmptyOperator default_args = { 'owner': 'data-team', 'depends_on_past': False, 'email_on_failure': True, 'email_on_retry': False, 'retries': 3, 'retry_delay': timedelta(minutes=5), 'retry_exponential_backoff': True, 'max_retry_delay': timedelta(hours=1), } with DAG( dag_id='example_etl', default_args=default_args, description='Example ETL pipeline', schedule='0 6 * * *', # Daily at 6 AM start_date=datetime(2024, 1, 1), catchup=False, tags=['etl', 'example'], max_active_runs=1, ) as dag: start = EmptyOperator(task_id='start') def extract_data(**context): execution_date = context['ds'] # Extract logic here return {'records': 1000} extract = PythonOperator( task_id='extract', python_callable=extract_data, ) end = EmptyOperator(task_id='end') start >> extract >> end ``` ## Patterns ### Pattern 1: TaskFlow API (Airflow 2.0+) ```python # dags/taskflow_example.py from datetime import datetime from airflow.decorators import dag, task from airflow.models import Variable @dag( dag_id='taskflow_etl', schedule='@daily', start_date=datetime(2024, 1, 1), catchup=False, tags=['etl', 'taskflow'], ) def taskflow_etl(): """ETL pipeline using TaskFlow API""" @task() def extract(source: str) -> dict: """Extract data from source""" import pandas as pd df = pd.read_csv(f's3://bucket/{source}/{{ ds }}.csv') return {'data': df.to_dict(), 'rows': len(df)} @task() def transform(extracted: dict) -> dict: """Transform extracted data""" import pandas as pd df = pd.DataFrame(extracted['data']) df['processed_at'] = datetime.now() df = df.dropna() return {'data': df.to_dict(), 'rows': len(df)} @task() def load(transformed: dict, target: str): """Load data to target""" import pandas as pd df = pd.DataFrame(transformed['data']) df.to_parquet(f's3://bucket/{target}/{{ ds }}.parquet') return transformed['rows'] @task() def notify(rows_loaded: int): """Send notification""" print(f'Loaded {rows_loaded} rows') # Define dependencies with XCom passing extracted = extract(source='raw_data') transformed = transform(extracted) loaded = load(transformed, target='processed_data') notify(loaded) # Instantiate the DAG taskflow_etl() ``` ### Pattern 2: Dynamic DAG Generation ```python # dags/dynamic_dag_factory.py from datetime import datetime, timedelta from airflow import DAG from airflow.operators.python import PythonOperator from airflow.models import Variable import json # Configuration for multiple similar pipelines PIPELINE_CONFIGS = [ {'name': 'customers', 'schedule': '@daily', 'source': 's3://raw/customers'}, {'name': 'orders', 'schedule': '@hourly', 'source': 's3://raw/orders'}, {'name': 'products', 'schedule': '@weekly', 'source': 's3://raw/products'}, ] def create_dag(config: dict) -> DAG: """Factory function to create DAGs from config""" dag_id = f"etl_{config['name']}" default_args = { 'owner': 'data-team', 'retries': 3, 'retry_delay': timedelta(minutes=5), } dag = DAG( dag_id=dag_id, default_args=default_args, schedule=config['schedule'], start_date=datetime(2024, 1, 1), catchup=False, tags=['etl', 'dynamic', config['name']], ) with dag: def extract_fn(source, **context): print(f"Extracting from {source} for {context['ds']}") def transform_fn(**context): print(f"Transforming data for {context['ds']}") def load_fn(table_name, **context): print(f"Loading to {table_name} for {context['ds']}") extract = PythonOperator( task_id='extract', python_callable=extract_fn, op_kwargs={'source': config['source']}, ) transform = PythonOperator( task_id='transform', python_callable=transform_fn, ) load = PythonOperator( task_id='load', python_callable=load_fn, op_kwargs={'table_name': config['name']}, ) extract >> transform >> load return dag # Generate DAGs for config in PIPELINE_CONFIGS: globals()[f"dag_{config['name']}"] = create_dag(config) ``` ### Pattern 3: Branching and Conditional Logic ```python # dags/branching_example.py from airflow.decorators import dag, task from airflow.operators.python import BranchPythonOperator from airflow.operators.empty import EmptyOperator from airflow.utils.trigger_rule import TriggerRule @dag( dag_id='branching_pipeline', schedule='@daily', start_date=datetime(2024, 1, 1), catchup=False, ) def branching_pipeline(): @task() def check_data_quality() -> dict: """Check data quality and return metrics""" quality_score = 0.95 # Simulated return {'score': quality_score, 'rows': 10000} def choose_branch(**context) -> str: """Determine which branch to execute""" ti = context['ti'] metrics = ti.xcom_pull(task_ids='check_data_quality') if metrics['score'] >= 0.9: return 'high_quality_path' elif metrics['score'] >= 0.7: return 'medium_quality_path' else: return 'low_quality_path' quality_check = check_data_quality() branch = BranchPythonOperator( task_id='branch', python_callable=choose_branch, ) high_quality = EmptyOperator(task_id='high_quality_path') medium_quality = EmptyOperator(task_id='medium_quality_path') low_quality = EmptyOperator(task_id='low_quality_path') # Join point - runs after any branch completes join = EmptyOperator( task_id='join', trigger_rule=TriggerRule.NONE_FAILED_MIN_ONE_SUCCESS, ) quality_check >> branch >> [high_quality, medium_quality, low_quality] >> join branching_pipeline() ``` ### Pattern 4: Sensors and External Dependencies ```python # dags/sensor_patterns.py from datetime import datetime, timedelta from airflow import DAG from airflow.sensors.filesystem import FileSensor from airflow.providers.amazon.aws.sensors.s3 import S3KeySensor from airflow.sensors.external_task import ExternalTaskSensor from airflow.operators.python import PythonOperator with DAG( dag_id='sensor_example', schedule='@daily', start_date=datetime(2024, 1, 1), catchup=False, ) as dag: # Wait for file on S3 wait_for_file = S3KeySensor( task_id='wait_for_s3_file', bucket_name='data-lake', bucket_key='raw/{{ ds }}/data.parquet', aws_conn_id='aws_default', timeout=60 * 60 * 2, # 2 hours poke_interval=60 * 5, # Check every 5 minutes mode='reschedule', # Free up worker slot while waiting ) # Wait for another DAG to complete wait_for_upstream = ExternalTaskSensor( task_id='wait_for_upstream_dag', external_dag_id='upstream_etl', external_task_id='final_task', execution_date_fn=lambda dt: dt, # Same execution date timeout=60 * 60 * 3, mode='reschedule', ) # Custom sensor using @task.sensor decorator @task.sensor(poke_interval=60, timeout=3600, mode='reschedule') def wait_for_api() -> PokeReturnValue: """Custom sensor for API availability""" import requests response = requests.get('https://api.example.com/health') is_done = response.status_code == 200 return PokeReturnValue(is_done=is_done, xcom_value=response.json()) api_ready = wait_for_api() def process_data(**context): api_result = context['ti'].xcom_pull(task_ids='wait_for_api') print(f"API returned: {api_result}") process = PythonOperator( task_id='process', python_callable=process_data, ) [wait_for_file, wait_for_upstream, api_ready] >> process ``` ### Pattern 5: Error Handling and Alerts ```python # dags/error_handling.py from datetime import datetime, timedelta from airflow import DAG from airflow.operators.python import PythonOperator from airflow.utils.trigger_rule import TriggerRule from airflow.models import Variable def task_failure_callback(context): """Callback on task failure""" task_instance = context['task_instance'] exception = context.get('exception') # Send to Slack/PagerDuty/etc message = f""" Task Failed! DAG: {task_instance.dag_id} Task: {task_instance.task_id} Execution Date: {context['ds']} Error: {exception} Log URL: {task_instance.log_url} """ # send_slack_alert(message) print(message) def dag_failure_callback(context): """Callback on DAG failure""" # Aggregate failures, send summary pass with DAG( dag_id='error_handling_example', schedule='@daily', start_date=datetime(2024, 1, 1), catchup=False, on_failure_callback=dag_failure_callback, default_args={ 'on_failure_callback': task_failure_callback, 'retries': 3, 'retry_delay': timedelta(minutes=5), }, ) as dag: def might_fail(**context): import random if random.random() < 0.3: raise ValueError("Random failure!") return "Success" risky_task = PythonOperator( task_id='risky_task', python_callable=might_fail, ) def cleanup(**context): """Cleanup runs regardless of upstream failures""" print("Cleaning up...") cleanup_task = PythonOperator( task_id='cleanup', python_callable=cleanup, trigger_rule=TriggerRule.ALL_DONE, # Run even if upstream fails ) def notify_success(**context): """Only runs if all upstream succeeded""" print("All tasks succeeded!") success_notification = PythonOperator( task_id='notify_success', python_callable=notify_success, trigger_rule=TriggerRule.ALL_SUCCESS, ) risky_task >> [cleanup_task, success_notification] ``` ### Pattern 6: Testing DAGs ```python # tests/test_dags.py import pytest from datetime import datetime from airflow.models import DagBag @pytest.fixture def dagbag(): return DagBag(dag_folder='dags/', include_examples=False) def test_dag_loaded(dagbag): """Test that all DAGs load without errors""" assert len(dagbag.import_errors) == 0, f"DAG import errors: {dagbag.import_errors}" def test_dag_structure(dagbag): """Test specific DAG structure""" dag = dagbag.get_dag('example_etl') assert dag is not None assert len(dag.tasks) == 3 assert dag.schedule_interval == '0 6 * * *' def test_task_dependencies(dagbag): """Test task dependencies are correct""" dag = dagbag.get_dag('example_etl') extract_task = dag.get_task('extract') assert 'start' in [t.task_id for t in extract_task.upstream_list] assert 'end' in [t.task_id for t in extract_task.downstream_list] def test_dag_integrity(dagbag): """Test DAG has no cycles and is valid""" for dag_id, dag in dagbag.dags.items(): assert dag.test_cycle() is None, f"Cycle detected in {dag_id}" # Test individual task logic def test_extract_function(): """Unit test for extract function""" from dags.example_dag import extract_data result = extract_data(ds='2024-01-01') assert 'records' in result assert isinstance(result['records'], int) ``` ## Project Structure ``` airflow/ β”œβ”€β”€ dags/ β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ __init__.py β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ common/ β”‚ β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ __init__.py β”‚ β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ operators.py # Custom operators β”‚ β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ sensors.py # Custom sensors β”‚ β”‚ └── callbacks.py # Alert callbacks β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ etl/ β”‚ β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ customers.py β”‚ β”‚ └── orders.py β”‚ └── ml/ β”‚ └── training.py β”œβ”€β”€ plugins/ β”‚ └── custom_plugin.py β”œβ”€β”€ tests/ β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ __init__.py β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ test_dags.py β”‚ └── test_operators.py β”œβ”€β”€ docker-compose.yml └── requirements.txt ``` ## Best Practices ### Do's - **Use TaskFlow API** - Cleaner code, automatic XCom - **Set timeouts** - Prevent zombie tasks - **Use `mode='reschedule'`** - For sensors, free up workers - **Test DAGs** - Unit tests and integration tests - **Idempotent tasks** - Safe to retry ### Don'ts - **Don't use `depends_on_past=True`** - Creates bottlenecks - **Don't hardcode dates** - Use `{{ ds }}` macros - **Don't use global state** - Tasks should be stateless - **Don't skip catchup blindly** - Understand implications - **Don't put heavy logic in DAG file** - Import from modules ## Resources - [Airflow Documentation](https://airflow.apache.org/docs/) - [Astronomer Guides](https://docs.astronomer.io/learn) - [TaskFlow API](https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/stable/tutorial/taskflow.html)
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

track-management

Use this skill when creating, managing, or working with Conductor

coding
⭐1
# Track Management Guide for creating, managing, and completing Conductor tracks - the logical work units that organize features, bugs, and refactors through specification, planning, and implementation phases. ## When to Use This Skill - Creating new feature, bug, or refactor tracks - Writing or reviewing spec.md files - Creating or updating plan.md files - Managing track lifecycle from creation to completion - Understanding track status markers and conventions - Working with the tracks.md registry - Interpreting or updating track metadata ## Track Concept A track is a logical work unit that encapsulates a complete piece of work. Each track has: - A unique identifier - A specification defining requirements - A phased plan breaking work into tasks - Metadata tracking status and progress Tracks provide semantic organization for work, enabling: - Clear scope boundaries - Progress tracking - Git-aware operations (revert by track) - Team coordination ## Track Types ### feature New functionality or capabilities. Use for: - New user-facing features - New API endpoints - New integrations - Significant enhancements ### bug Defect fixes. Use for: - Incorrect behavior - Error conditions - Performance regressions - Security vulnerabilities ### chore Maintenance and housekeeping. Use for: - Dependency updates - Configuration changes - Documentation updates - Cleanup tasks ### refactor Code improvement without behavior change. Use for: - Code restructuring - Pattern adoption - Technical debt reduction - Performance optimization (same behavior, better performance) ## Track ID Format Track IDs follow the pattern: `{shortname}_{YYYYMMDD}` - **shortname**: 2-4 word kebab-case description (e.g., `user-auth`, `api-rate-limit`) - **YYYYMMDD**: Creation date in ISO format Examples: - `user-auth_20250115` - `fix-login-error_20250115` - `upgrade-deps_20250115` - `refactor-api-client_20250115` ## Track Lifecycle ### 1. Creation (newTrack) **Define Requirements** 1. Gather requirements through interactive Q&A 2. Identify acceptance criteria 3. Determine scope boundaries 4. Identify dependencies **Generate Specification** 1. Create `spec.md` with structured requirements 2. Document functional and non-functional requirements 3. Define acceptance criteria 4. List dependencies and constraints **Generate Plan** 1. Create `plan.md` with phased task breakdown 2. Organize tasks into logical phases 3. Add verification tasks after phases 4. Estimate effort and complexity **Register Track** 1. Add entry to `tracks.md` registry 2. Create track directory structure 3. Generate `metadata.json` 4. Create track `index.md` ### 2. Implementation **Execute Tasks** 1. Select next pending task from plan 2. Mark task as in-progress 3. Implement following workflow (TDD) 4. Mark task complete with commit SHA **Update Status** 1. Update task markers in plan.md 2. Record commit SHAs for traceability 3. Update phase progress 4. Update track status in tracks.md **Verify Progress** 1. Complete verification tasks 2. Wait for checkpoint approval 3. Record checkpoint commits ### 3. Completion **Sync Documentation** 1. Update product.md if features added 2. Update tech-stack.md if dependencies changed 3. Verify all acceptance criteria met **Archive or Delete** 1. Mark track as completed in tracks.md 2. Record completion date 3. Archive or retain track directory ## Specification (spec.md) Structure ```markdown # {Track Title} ## Overview Brief description of what this track accomplishes and why. ## Functional Requirements ### FR-1: {Requirement Name} Description of the functional requirement. - Acceptance: How to verify this requirement is met ### FR-2: {Requirement Name} ... ## Non-Functional Requirements ### NFR-1: {Requirement Name} Description of the non-functional requirement (performance, security, etc.) - Target: Specific measurable target - Verification: How to test ## Acceptance Criteria - [ ] Criterion 1: Specific, testable condition - [ ] Criterion 2: Specific, testable condition - [ ] Criterion 3: Specific, testable condition ## Scope ### In Scope - Explicitly included items - Features to implement - Components to modify ### Out of Scope - Explicitly excluded items - Future considerations - Related but separate work ## Dependencies ### Internal - Other tracks or components this depends on - Required context artifacts ### External - Third-party services or APIs - External dependencies ## Risks and Mitigations | Risk | Impact | Mitigation | | ---------------- | --------------- | ------------------- | | Risk description | High/Medium/Low | Mitigation strategy | ## Open Questions - [ ] Question that needs resolution - [x] Resolved question - Answer ``` ## Plan (plan.md) Structure ```markdown # Implementation Plan: {Track Title} Track ID: `{track-id}` Created: YYYY-MM-DD Status: pending | in-progress | completed ## Overview Brief description of implementation approach. ## Phase 1: {Phase Name} ### Tasks - [ ] **Task 1.1**: Task description - Sub-task or detail - Sub-task or detail - [ ] **Task 1.2**: Task description - [ ] **Task 1.3**: Task description ### Verification - [ ] **Verify 1.1**: Verification step for phase ## Phase 2: {Phase Name} ### Tasks - [ ] **Task 2.1**: Task description - [ ] **Task 2.2**: Task description ### Verification - [ ] **Verify 2.1**: Verification step for phase ## Phase 3: Finalization ### Tasks - [ ] **Task 3.1**: Update documentation - [ ] **Task 3.2**: Final integration test ### Verification - [ ] **Verify 3.1**: All acceptance criteria met ## Checkpoints | Phase | Checkpoint SHA | Date | Status | | ------- | -------------- | ---- | ------- | | Phase 1 | | | pending | | Phase 2 | | | pending | | Phase 3 | | | pending | ``` ## Status Marker Conventions Use consistent markers in plan.md: | Marker | Meaning | Usage | | ------ | ----------- | --------------------------- | | `[ ]` | Pending | Task not started | | `[~]` | In Progress | Currently being worked | | `[x]` | Complete | Task finished (include SHA) | | `[-]` | Skipped | Intentionally not done | | `[!]` | Blocked | Waiting on dependency | Example: ```markdown - [x] **Task 1.1**: Set up database schema `abc1234` - [~] **Task 1.2**: Implement user model - [ ] **Task 1.3**: Add validation logic - [!] **Task 1.4**: Integrate auth service (blocked: waiting for API key) - [-] **Task 1.5**: Legacy migration (skipped: not needed) ``` ## Track Registry (tracks.md) Format ```markdown # Track Registry ## Active Tracks | Track ID | Type | Status | Phase | Started | Assignee | | ------------------------------------------------ | ------- | ----------- | ----- | ---------- | ---------- | | [user-auth_20250115](tracks/user-auth_20250115/) | feature | in-progress | 2/3 | 2025-01-15 | @developer | | [fix-login_20250114](tracks/fix-login_20250114/) | bug | pending | 0/2 | 2025-01-14 | - | ## Completed Tracks | Track ID | Type | Completed | Duration | | ---------------------------------------------- | ----- | ---------- | -------- | | [setup-ci_20250110](tracks/setup-ci_20250110/) | chore | 2025-01-12 | 2 days | ## Archived Tracks | Track ID | Reason | Archived | | ---------------------------------------------------- | ---------- | ---------- | | [old-feature_20241201](tracks/old-feature_20241201/) | Superseded | 2025-01-05 | ``` ## Metadata (metadata.json) Fields ```json { "id": "user-auth_20250115", "title": "User Authentication System", "type": "feature", "status": "in-progress", "priority": "high", "created": "2025-01-15T10:30:00Z", "updated": "2025-01-15T14:45:00Z", "started": "2025-01-15T11:00:00Z", "completed": null, "assignee": "@developer", "phases": { "total": 3, "current": 2, "completed": 1 }, "tasks": { "total": 12, "completed": 5, "in_progress": 1, "pending": 6 }, "checkpoints": [ { "phase": 1, "sha": "abc1234", "date": "2025-01-15T13:00:00Z" } ], "dependencies": [], "tags": ["auth", "security"] } ``` ## Track Operations ### Creating a Track 1. Run `/conductor:new-track` 2. Answer interactive questions 3. Review generated spec.md 4. Review generated plan.md 5. Confirm track creation ### Starting Implementation 1. Read spec.md and plan.md 2. Verify context artifacts are current 3. Mark first task as `[~]` 4. Begin TDD workflow ### Completing a Phase 1. Ensure all phase tasks are `[x]` 2. Complete verification tasks 3. Wait for checkpoint approval 4. Record checkpoint SHA 5. Proceed to next phase ### Completing a Track 1. Verify all phases complete 2. Verify all acceptance criteria met 3. Update product.md if needed 4. Mark track completed in tracks.md 5. Update metadata.json ### Reverting a Track 1. Run `/conductor:revert` 2. Select track to revert 3. Choose granularity (track/phase/task) 4. Confirm revert operation 5. Update status markers ## Handling Track Dependencies ### Identifying Dependencies During track creation, identify: - **Hard dependencies**: Must complete before this track can start - **Soft dependencies**: Can proceed in parallel but may affect integration - **External dependencies**: Third-party services, APIs, or team decisions ### Documenting Dependencies In spec.md, list dependencies with: - Dependency type (hard/soft/external) - Current status (available/pending/blocked) - Resolution path (what needs to happen) ### Managing Blocked Tracks When a track is blocked: 1. Mark blocked tasks with `[!]` and reason 2. Update tracks.md status 3. Document blocker in metadata.json 4. Consider creating dependency track if needed ## Track Sizing Guidelines ### Right-Sized Tracks Aim for tracks that: - Complete in 1-5 days of work - Have 2-4 phases - Contain 8-20 tasks total - Deliver a coherent, testable unit ### Too Large Signs a track is too large: - More than 5 phases - More than 25 tasks - Multiple unrelated features - Estimated duration > 1 week Solution: Split into multiple tracks with clear boundaries. ### Too Small Signs a track is too small: - Single phase with 1-2 tasks - No meaningful verification needed - Could be a sub-task of another track - Less than a few hours of work Solution: Combine with related work or handle as part of existing track. ## Specification Quality Checklist Before finalizing spec.md, verify: ### Requirements Quality - [ ] Each requirement has clear acceptance criteria - [ ] Requirements are testable - [ ] Requirements are independent (can verify separately) - [ ] No ambiguous language ("should be fast" β†’ "response < 200ms") ### Scope Clarity - [ ] In-scope items are specific - [ ] Out-of-scope items prevent scope creep - [ ] Boundaries are clear to implementer ### Dependencies Identified - [ ] All internal dependencies listed - [ ] External dependencies have owners/contacts - [ ] Dependency status is current ### Risks Addressed - [ ] Major risks identified - [ ] Impact assessment realistic - [ ] Mitigations are actionable ## Plan Quality Checklist Before starting implementation, verify plan.md: ### Task Quality - [ ] Tasks are atomic (one logical action) - [ ] Tasks are independently verifiable - [ ] Task descriptions are clear - [ ] Sub-tasks provide helpful detail ### Phase Organization - [ ] Phases group related tasks - [ ] Each phase delivers something testable - [ ] Verification tasks after each phase - [ ] Phases build on each other logically ### Completeness - [ ] All spec requirements have corresponding tasks - [ ] Documentation tasks included - [ ] Testing tasks included - [ ] Integration tasks included ## Common Track Patterns ### Feature Track Pattern ``` Phase 1: Foundation - Data models - Database migrations - Basic API structure Phase 2: Core Logic - Business logic implementation - Input validation - Error handling Phase 3: Integration - UI integration - API documentation - End-to-end tests ``` ### Bug Fix Track Pattern ``` Phase 1: Reproduction - Write failing test capturing bug - Document reproduction steps Phase 2: Fix - Implement fix - Verify test passes - Check for regressions Phase 3: Verification - Manual verification - Update documentation if needed ``` ### Refactor Track Pattern ``` Phase 1: Preparation - Add characterization tests - Document current behavior Phase 2: Refactoring - Apply changes incrementally - Maintain green tests throughout Phase 3: Cleanup - Remove dead code - Update documentation ``` ## Best Practices 1. **One track, one concern**: Keep tracks focused on a single logical change 2. **Small phases**: Break work into phases of 3-5 tasks maximum 3. **Verification after phases**: Always include verification tasks 4. **Update markers immediately**: Mark task status as you work 5. **Record SHAs**: Always note commit SHAs for completed tasks 6. **Review specs before planning**: Ensure spec is complete before creating plan 7. **Link dependencies**: Explicitly note track dependencies 8. **Archive, don't delete**: Preserve completed tracks for reference 9. **Size appropriately**: Keep tracks between 1-5 days of work 10. **Clear acceptance criteria**: Every requirement must be testable
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

gitlab-ci-patterns

Build GitLab CI/CD pipelines with multi-stage workflows, caching,

coding
⭐1
# GitLab CI Patterns Comprehensive GitLab CI/CD pipeline patterns for automated testing, building, and deployment. ## Purpose Create efficient GitLab CI pipelines with proper stage organization, caching, and deployment strategies. ## When to Use - Automate GitLab-based CI/CD - Implement multi-stage pipelines - Configure GitLab Runners - Deploy to Kubernetes from GitLab - Implement GitOps workflows ## Basic Pipeline Structure ```yaml stages: - build - test - deploy variables: DOCKER_DRIVER: overlay2 DOCKER_TLS_CERTDIR: "/certs" build: stage: build image: node:20 script: - npm ci - npm run build artifacts: paths: - dist/ expire_in: 1 hour cache: key: ${CI_COMMIT_REF_SLUG} paths: - node_modules/ test: stage: test image: node:20 script: - npm ci - npm run lint - npm test coverage: '/Lines\s*:\s*(\d+\.\d+)%/' artifacts: reports: coverage_report: coverage_format: cobertura path: coverage/cobertura-coverage.xml deploy: stage: deploy image: bitnami/kubectl:latest script: - kubectl apply -f k8s/ - kubectl rollout status deployment/my-app only: - main environment: name: production url: https://app.example.com ``` ## Docker Build and Push ```yaml build-docker: stage: build image: docker:24 services: - docker:24-dind before_script: - docker login -u $CI_REGISTRY_USER -p $CI_REGISTRY_PASSWORD $CI_REGISTRY script: - docker build -t $CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE:$CI_COMMIT_SHA . - docker build -t $CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE:latest . - docker push $CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE:$CI_COMMIT_SHA - docker push $CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE:latest only: - main - tags ``` ## Multi-Environment Deployment ```yaml .deploy_template: &deploy_template image: bitnami/kubectl:latest before_script: - kubectl config set-cluster k8s --server="$KUBE_URL" --insecure-skip-tls-verify=true - kubectl config set-credentials admin --token="$KUBE_TOKEN" - kubectl config set-context default --cluster=k8s --user=admin - kubectl config use-context default deploy:staging: <<: *deploy_template stage: deploy script: - kubectl apply -f k8s/ -n staging - kubectl rollout status deployment/my-app -n staging environment: name: staging url: https://staging.example.com only: - develop deploy:production: <<: *deploy_template stage: deploy script: - kubectl apply -f k8s/ -n production - kubectl rollout status deployment/my-app -n production environment: name: production url: https://app.example.com when: manual only: - main ``` ## Terraform Pipeline ```yaml stages: - validate - plan - apply variables: TF_ROOT: ${CI_PROJECT_DIR}/terraform TF_VERSION: "1.6.0" before_script: - cd ${TF_ROOT} - terraform --version validate: stage: validate image: hashicorp/terraform:${TF_VERSION} script: - terraform init -backend=false - terraform validate - terraform fmt -check plan: stage: plan image: hashicorp/terraform:${TF_VERSION} script: - terraform init - terraform plan -out=tfplan artifacts: paths: - ${TF_ROOT}/tfplan expire_in: 1 day apply: stage: apply image: hashicorp/terraform:${TF_VERSION} script: - terraform init - terraform apply -auto-approve tfplan dependencies: - plan when: manual only: - main ``` ## Security Scanning ```yaml include: - template: Security/SAST.gitlab-ci.yml - template: Security/Dependency-Scanning.gitlab-ci.yml - template: Security/Container-Scanning.gitlab-ci.yml trivy-scan: stage: test image: aquasec/trivy:latest script: - trivy image --exit-code 1 --severity HIGH,CRITICAL $CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE:$CI_COMMIT_SHA allow_failure: true ``` ## Caching Strategies ```yaml # Cache node_modules build: cache: key: ${CI_COMMIT_REF_SLUG} paths: - node_modules/ policy: pull-push # Global cache cache: key: ${CI_COMMIT_REF_SLUG} paths: - .cache/ - vendor/ # Separate cache per job job1: cache: key: job1-cache paths: - build/ job2: cache: key: job2-cache paths: - dist/ ``` ## Dynamic Child Pipelines ```yaml generate-pipeline: stage: build script: - python generate_pipeline.py > child-pipeline.yml artifacts: paths: - child-pipeline.yml trigger-child: stage: deploy trigger: include: - artifact: child-pipeline.yml job: generate-pipeline strategy: depend ``` ## Reference Files - `assets/gitlab-ci.yml.template` - Complete pipeline template - `references/pipeline-stages.md` - Stage organization patterns ## Best Practices 1. **Use specific image tags** (node:20, not node:latest) 2. **Cache dependencies** appropriately 3. **Use artifacts** for build outputs 4. **Implement manual gates** for production 5. **Use environments** for deployment tracking 6. **Enable merge request pipelines** 7. **Use pipeline schedules** for recurring jobs 8. **Implement security scanning** 9. **Use CI/CD variables** for secrets 10. **Monitor pipeline performance** ## Related Skills - `github-actions-templates` - For GitHub Actions - `deployment-pipeline-design` - For architecture - `secrets-management` - For secrets handling
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

data-quality-frameworks

Implement data quality validation with Great Expectations, dbt

data
⭐1
# Data Quality Frameworks Production patterns for implementing data quality with Great Expectations, dbt tests, and data contracts to ensure reliable data pipelines. ## When to Use This Skill - Implementing data quality checks in pipelines - Setting up Great Expectations validation - Building comprehensive dbt test suites - Establishing data contracts between teams - Monitoring data quality metrics - Automating data validation in CI/CD ## Core Concepts ### 1. Data Quality Dimensions | Dimension | Description | Example Check | | ---------------- | ------------------------ | -------------------------------------------------- | | **Completeness** | No missing values | `expect_column_values_to_not_be_null` | | **Uniqueness** | No duplicates | `expect_column_values_to_be_unique` | | **Validity** | Values in expected range | `expect_column_values_to_be_in_set` | | **Accuracy** | Data matches reality | Cross-reference validation | | **Consistency** | No contradictions | `expect_column_pair_values_A_to_be_greater_than_B` | | **Timeliness** | Data is recent | `expect_column_max_to_be_between` | ### 2. Testing Pyramid for Data ``` /\ / \ Integration Tests (cross-table) /────\ / \ Unit Tests (single column) /────────\ / \ Schema Tests (structure) /────────────\ ``` ## Quick Start ### Great Expectations Setup ```bash # Install pip install great_expectations # Initialize project great_expectations init # Create datasource great_expectations datasource new ``` ```python # great_expectations/checkpoints/daily_validation.yml import great_expectations as gx # Create context context = gx.get_context() # Create expectation suite suite = context.add_expectation_suite("orders_suite") # Add expectations suite.add_expectation( gx.expectations.ExpectColumnValuesToNotBeNull(column="order_id") ) suite.add_expectation( gx.expectations.ExpectColumnValuesToBeUnique(column="order_id") ) # Validate results = context.run_checkpoint(checkpoint_name="daily_orders") ``` ## Patterns ### Pattern 1: Great Expectations Suite ```python # expectations/orders_suite.py import great_expectations as gx from great_expectations.core import ExpectationSuite from great_expectations.core.expectation_configuration import ExpectationConfiguration def build_orders_suite() -> ExpectationSuite: """Build comprehensive orders expectation suite""" suite = ExpectationSuite(expectation_suite_name="orders_suite") # Schema expectations suite.add_expectation(ExpectationConfiguration( expectation_type="expect_table_columns_to_match_set", kwargs={ "column_set": ["order_id", "customer_id", "amount", "status", "created_at"], "exact_match": False # Allow additional columns } )) # Primary key suite.add_expectation(ExpectationConfiguration( expectation_type="expect_column_values_to_not_be_null", kwargs={"column": "order_id"} )) suite.add_expectation(ExpectationConfiguration( expectation_type="expect_column_values_to_be_unique", kwargs={"column": "order_id"} )) # Foreign key suite.add_expectation(ExpectationConfiguration( expectation_type="expect_column_values_to_not_be_null", kwargs={"column": "customer_id"} )) # Categorical values suite.add_expectation(ExpectationConfiguration( expectation_type="expect_column_values_to_be_in_set", kwargs={ "column": "status", "value_set": ["pending", "processing", "shipped", "delivered", "cancelled"] } )) # Numeric ranges suite.add_expectation(ExpectationConfiguration( expectation_type="expect_column_values_to_be_between", kwargs={ "column": "amount", "min_value": 0, "max_value": 100000, "strict_min": True # amount > 0 } )) # Date validity suite.add_expectation(ExpectationConfiguration( expectation_type="expect_column_values_to_be_dateutil_parseable", kwargs={"column": "created_at"} )) # Freshness - data should be recent suite.add_expectation(ExpectationConfiguration( expectation_type="expect_column_max_to_be_between", kwargs={ "column": "created_at", "min_value": {"$PARAMETER": "now - timedelta(days=1)"}, "max_value": {"$PARAMETER": "now"} } )) # Row count sanity suite.add_expectation(ExpectationConfiguration( expectation_type="expect_table_row_count_to_be_between", kwargs={ "min_value": 1000, # Expect at least 1000 rows "max_value": 10000000 } )) # Statistical expectations suite.add_expectation(ExpectationConfiguration( expectation_type="expect_column_mean_to_be_between", kwargs={ "column": "amount", "min_value": 50, "max_value": 500 } )) return suite ``` ### Pattern 2: Great Expectations Checkpoint ```yaml # great_expectations/checkpoints/orders_checkpoint.yml name: orders_checkpoint config_version: 1.0 class_name: Checkpoint run_name_template: "%Y%m%d-%H%M%S-orders-validation" validations: - batch_request: datasource_name: warehouse data_connector_name: default_inferred_data_connector_name data_asset_name: orders data_connector_query: index: -1 # Latest batch expectation_suite_name: orders_suite action_list: - name: store_validation_result action: class_name: StoreValidationResultAction - name: store_evaluation_parameters action: class_name: StoreEvaluationParametersAction - name: update_data_docs action: class_name: UpdateDataDocsAction # Slack notification on failure - name: send_slack_notification action: class_name: SlackNotificationAction slack_webhook: ${SLACK_WEBHOOK} notify_on: failure renderer: module_name: great_expectations.render.renderer.slack_renderer class_name: SlackRenderer ``` ```python # Run checkpoint import great_expectations as gx context = gx.get_context() result = context.run_checkpoint(checkpoint_name="orders_checkpoint") if not result.success: failed_expectations = [ r for r in result.run_results.values() if not r.success ] raise ValueError(f"Data quality check failed: {failed_expectations}") ``` ### Pattern 3: dbt Data Tests ```yaml # models/marts/core/_core__models.yml version: 2 models: - name: fct_orders description: Order fact table tests: # Table-level tests - dbt_utils.recency: datepart: day field: created_at interval: 1 - dbt_utils.at_least_one - dbt_utils.expression_is_true: expression: "total_amount >= 0" columns: - name: order_id description: Primary key tests: - unique - not_null - name: customer_id description: Foreign key to dim_customers tests: - not_null - relationships: to: ref('dim_customers') field: customer_id - name: order_status tests: - accepted_values: values: ["pending", "processing", "shipped", "delivered", "cancelled"] - name: total_amount tests: - not_null - dbt_utils.expression_is_true: expression: ">= 0" - name: created_at tests: - not_null - dbt_utils.expression_is_true: expression: "<= current_timestamp" - name: dim_customers columns: - name: customer_id tests: - unique - not_null - name: email tests: - unique - not_null # Custom regex test - dbt_utils.expression_is_true: expression: "email ~ '^[A-Za-z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Za-z0-9.-]+\\.[A-Za-z]{2,}$'" ``` ### Pattern 4: Custom dbt Tests ```sql -- tests/generic/test_row_count_in_range.sql {% test row_count_in_range(model, min_count, max_count) %} with row_count as ( select count(*) as cnt from {{ model }} ) select cnt from row_count where cnt < {{ min_count }} or cnt > {{ max_count }} {% endtest %} -- Usage in schema.yml: -- tests: -- - row_count_in_range: -- min_count: 1000 -- max_count: 10000000 ``` ```sql -- tests/generic/test_sequential_values.sql {% test sequential_values(model, column_name, interval=1) %} with lagged as ( select {{ column_name }}, lag({{ column_name }}) over (order by {{ column_name }}) as prev_value from {{ model }} ) select * from lagged where {{ column_name }} - prev_value != {{ interval }} and prev_value is not null {% endtest %} ``` ```sql -- tests/singular/assert_orders_customers_match.sql -- Singular test: specific business rule with orders_customers as ( select distinct customer_id from {{ ref('fct_orders') }} ), dim_customers as ( select customer_id from {{ ref('dim_customers') }} ), orphaned_orders as ( select o.customer_id from orders_customers o left join dim_customers c using (customer_id) where c.customer_id is null ) select * from orphaned_orders -- Test passes if this returns 0 rows ``` ### Pattern 5: Data Contracts ```yaml # contracts/orders_contract.yaml apiVersion: datacontract.com/v1.0.0 kind: DataContract metadata: name: orders version: 1.0.0 owner: data-platform-team contact: data-team@company.com info: title: Orders Data Contract description: Contract for order event data from the ecommerce platform purpose: Analytics, reporting, and ML features servers: production: type: snowflake account: company.us-east-1 database: ANALYTICS schema: CORE terms: usage: Internal analytics only limitations: PII must not be exposed in downstream marts billing: Charged per query TB scanned schema: type: object properties: order_id: type: string format: uuid description: Unique order identifier required: true unique: true pii: false customer_id: type: string format: uuid description: Customer identifier required: true pii: true piiClassification: indirect total_amount: type: number minimum: 0 maximum: 100000 description: Order total in USD created_at: type: string format: date-time description: Order creation timestamp required: true status: type: string enum: [pending, processing, shipped, delivered, cancelled] description: Current order status quality: type: SodaCL specification: checks for orders: - row_count > 0 - missing_count(order_id) = 0 - duplicate_count(order_id) = 0 - invalid_count(status) = 0: valid values: [pending, processing, shipped, delivered, cancelled] - freshness(created_at) < 24h sla: availability: 99.9% freshness: 1 hour latency: 5 minutes ``` ### Pattern 6: Automated Quality Pipeline ```python # quality_pipeline.py from dataclasses import dataclass from typing import List, Dict, Any import great_expectations as gx from datetime import datetime @dataclass class QualityResult: table: str passed: bool total_expectations: int failed_expectations: int details: List[Dict[str, Any]] timestamp: datetime class DataQualityPipeline: """Orchestrate data quality checks across tables""" def __init__(self, context: gx.DataContext): self.context = context self.results: List[QualityResult] = [] def validate_table(self, table: str, suite: str) -> QualityResult: """Validate a single table against expectation suite""" checkpoint_config = { "name": f"{table}_validation", "config_version": 1.0, "class_name": "Checkpoint", "validations": [{ "batch_request": { "datasource_name": "warehouse", "data_asset_name": table, }, "expectation_suite_name": suite, }], } result = self.context.run_checkpoint(**checkpoint_config) # Parse results validation_result = list(result.run_results.values())[0] results = validation_result.results failed = [r for r in results if not r.success] return QualityResult( table=table, passed=result.success, total_expectations=len(results), failed_expectations=len(failed), details=[{ "expectation": r.expectation_config.expectation_type, "success": r.success, "observed_value": r.result.get("observed_value"), } for r in results], timestamp=datetime.now() ) def run_all(self, tables: Dict[str, str]) -> Dict[str, QualityResult]: """Run validation for all tables""" results = {} for table, suite in tables.items(): print(f"Validating {table}...") results[table] = self.validate_table(table, suite) return results def generate_report(self, results: Dict[str, QualityResult]) -> str: """Generate quality report""" report = ["# Data Quality Report", f"Generated: {datetime.now()}", ""] total_passed = sum(1 for r in results.values() if r.passed) total_tables = len(results) report.append(f"## Summary: {total_passed}/{total_tables} tables passed") report.append("") for table, result in results.items(): status = "βœ…" if result.passed else "❌" report.append(f"### {status} {table}") report.append(f"- Expectations: {result.total_expectations}") report.append(f"- Failed: {result.failed_expectations}") if not result.passed: report.append("- Failed checks:") for detail in result.details: if not detail["success"]: report.append(f" - {detail['expectation']}: {detail['observed_value']}") report.append("") return "\n".join(report) # Usage context = gx.get_context() pipeline = DataQualityPipeline(context) tables_to_validate = { "orders": "orders_suite", "customers": "customers_suite", "products": "products_suite", } results = pipeline.run_all(tables_to_validate) report = pipeline.generate_report(results) # Fail pipeline if any table failed if not all(r.passed for r in results.values()): print(report) raise ValueError("Data quality checks failed!") ``` ## Best Practices ### Do's - **Test early** - Validate source data before transformations - **Test incrementally** - Add tests as you find issues - **Document expectations** - Clear descriptions for each test - **Alert on failures** - Integrate with monitoring - **Version contracts** - Track schema changes ### Don'ts - **Don't test everything** - Focus on critical columns - **Don't ignore warnings** - They often precede failures - **Don't skip freshness** - Stale data is bad data - **Don't hardcode thresholds** - Use dynamic baselines - **Don't test in isolation** - Test relationships too ## Resources - [Great Expectations Documentation](https://docs.greatexpectations.io/) - [dbt Testing Documentation](https://docs.getdbt.com/docs/build/tests) - [Data Contract Specification](https://datacontract.com/) - [Soda Core](https://docs.soda.io/soda-core/overview.html)
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

context-driven-development

Creates and maintains project context artifacts (product.md,

coding
⭐1
# Context-Driven Development Guide for implementing and maintaining context as a managed artifact alongside code, enabling consistent AI interactions and team alignment through structured project documentation. ## When to Use This Skill - Setting up new projects with Conductor - Understanding the relationship between context artifacts - Maintaining consistency across AI-assisted development sessions - Onboarding team members to an existing Conductor project - Deciding when to update context documents - Managing greenfield vs brownfield project contexts ## Core Philosophy Context-Driven Development treats project context as a first-class artifact managed alongside code. Instead of relying on ad-hoc prompts or scattered documentation, establish a persistent, structured foundation that informs all AI interactions. Key principles: 1. **Context precedes code**: Define what you're building and how before implementation 2. **Living documentation**: Context artifacts evolve with the project 3. **Single source of truth**: One canonical location for each type of information 4. **AI alignment**: Consistent context produces consistent AI behavior ## The Workflow Follow the **Context β†’ Spec & Plan β†’ Implement** workflow: 1. **Context Phase**: Establish or verify project context artifacts exist and are current 2. **Specification Phase**: Define requirements and acceptance criteria for work units 3. **Planning Phase**: Break specifications into phased, actionable tasks 4. **Implementation Phase**: Execute tasks following established workflow patterns ## Artifact Relationships ### product.md - Defines WHAT and WHY Purpose: Captures product vision, goals, target users, and business context. Contents: - Product name and one-line description - Problem statement and solution approach - Target user personas - Core features and capabilities - Success metrics and KPIs - Product roadmap (high-level) Update when: - Product vision or goals change - New major features are planned - Target audience shifts - Business priorities evolve ### product-guidelines.md - Defines HOW to Communicate Purpose: Establishes brand voice, messaging standards, and communication patterns. Contents: - Brand voice and tone guidelines - Terminology and glossary - Error message conventions - User-facing copy standards - Documentation style Update when: - Brand guidelines change - New terminology is introduced - Communication patterns need refinement ### tech-stack.md - Defines WITH WHAT Purpose: Documents technology choices, dependencies, and architectural decisions. Contents: - Primary languages and frameworks - Key dependencies with versions - Infrastructure and deployment targets - Development tools and environment - Testing frameworks - Code quality tools Update when: - Adding new dependencies - Upgrading major versions - Changing infrastructure - Adopting new tools or patterns ### workflow.md - Defines HOW to Work Purpose: Establishes development practices, quality gates, and team workflows. Contents: - Development methodology (TDD, etc.) - Git workflow and commit conventions - Code review requirements - Testing requirements and coverage targets - Quality assurance gates - Deployment procedures Update when: - Team practices evolve - Quality standards change - New workflow patterns are adopted ### tracks.md - Tracks WHAT'S HAPPENING Purpose: Registry of all work units with status and metadata. Contents: - Active tracks with current status - Completed tracks with completion dates - Track metadata (type, priority, assignee) - Links to individual track directories Update when: - New tracks are created - Track status changes - Tracks are completed or archived See [references/artifact-templates.md](references/artifact-templates.md) for copy-paste starter templates. ## Context Maintenance Principles ### Keep Artifacts Synchronized Ensure changes in one artifact reflect in related documents: - New feature in product.md β†’ Update tech-stack.md if new dependencies needed - Completed track β†’ Update product.md to reflect new capabilities - Workflow change β†’ Update all affected track plans ### Update tech-stack.md When Adding Dependencies Before adding any new dependency: 1. Check if existing dependencies solve the need 2. Document the rationale for new dependencies 3. Add version constraints 4. Note any configuration requirements ### Update product.md When Features Complete After completing a feature track: 1. Move feature from "planned" to "implemented" in product.md 2. Update any affected success metrics 3. Document any scope changes from original plan ### Verify Context Before Implementation Before starting any track: 1. Read all context artifacts 2. Flag any outdated information 3. Propose updates before proceeding 4. Confirm context accuracy with stakeholders ## Greenfield vs Brownfield Handling ### Greenfield Projects (New) For new projects: 1. Run `/conductor:setup` to create all artifacts interactively 2. Answer questions about product vision, tech preferences, and workflow 3. Generate initial style guides for chosen languages 4. Create empty tracks registry Characteristics: - Full control over context structure - Define standards before code exists - Establish patterns early ### Brownfield Projects (Existing) For existing codebases: 1. Run `/conductor:setup` with existing codebase detection 2. System analyzes existing code, configs, and documentation 3. Pre-populate artifacts based on discovered patterns 4. Review and refine generated context Characteristics: - Extract implicit context from existing code - Reconcile existing patterns with desired patterns - Document technical debt and modernization plans - Preserve working patterns while establishing standards ## Benefits ### Team Alignment - New team members onboard faster with explicit context - Consistent terminology and conventions across the team - Shared understanding of product goals and technical decisions ### AI Consistency - AI assistants produce aligned outputs across sessions - Reduced need to re-explain context in each interaction - Predictable behavior based on documented standards ### Institutional Memory - Decisions and rationale are preserved - Context survives team changes - Historical context informs future decisions ### Quality Assurance - Standards are explicit and verifiable - Deviations from context are detectable - Quality gates are documented and enforceable ## Directory Structure ``` conductor/ β”œβ”€β”€ index.md # Navigation hub linking all artifacts β”œβ”€β”€ product.md # Product vision and goals β”œβ”€β”€ product-guidelines.md # Communication standards β”œβ”€β”€ tech-stack.md # Technology preferences β”œβ”€β”€ workflow.md # Development practices β”œβ”€β”€ tracks.md # Work unit registry β”œβ”€β”€ setup_state.json # Resumable setup state β”œβ”€β”€ code_styleguides/ # Language-specific conventions β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ python.md β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ typescript.md β”‚ └── ... └── tracks/ └── <track-id>/ β”œβ”€β”€ spec.md β”œβ”€β”€ plan.md β”œβ”€β”€ metadata.json └── index.md ``` ## Context Lifecycle 1. **Creation**: Initial setup via `/conductor:setup` 2. **Validation**: Verify before each track 3. **Evolution**: Update as project grows 4. **Synchronization**: Keep artifacts aligned 5. **Archival**: Document historical decisions ## Context Validation Checklist Before starting implementation on any track, validate context: ### Product Context - [ ] product.md reflects current product vision - [ ] Target users are accurately described - [ ] Feature list is up to date - [ ] Success metrics are defined ### Technical Context - [ ] tech-stack.md lists all current dependencies - [ ] Version numbers are accurate - [ ] Infrastructure targets are correct - [ ] Development tools are documented ### Workflow Context - [ ] workflow.md describes current practices - [ ] Quality gates are defined - [ ] Coverage targets are specified - [ ] Commit conventions are documented ### Track Context - [ ] tracks.md shows all active work - [ ] No stale or abandoned tracks - [ ] Dependencies between tracks are noted ## Common Anti-Patterns Avoid these context management mistakes: ### Stale Context Problem: Context documents become outdated and misleading. Solution: Update context as part of each track's completion process. ### Context Sprawl Problem: Information scattered across multiple locations. Solution: Use the defined artifact structure; resist creating new document types. ### Implicit Context Problem: Relying on knowledge not captured in artifacts. Solution: If you reference something repeatedly, add it to the appropriate artifact. ### Context Hoarding Problem: One person maintains context without team input. Solution: Review context artifacts in pull requests; make updates collaborative. ### Over-Specification Problem: Context becomes so detailed it's impossible to maintain. Solution: Keep artifacts focused on decisions that affect AI behavior and team alignment. ## Integration with Development Tools ### IDE Integration Configure your IDE to display context files prominently: - Pin conductor/product.md for quick reference - Add tech-stack.md to project notes - Create snippets for common patterns from style guides ### Git Hooks Consider pre-commit hooks that: - Warn when dependencies change without tech-stack.md update - Remind to update product.md when feature branches merge - Validate context artifact syntax ### CI/CD Integration Include context validation in pipelines: - Check tech-stack.md matches actual dependencies - Verify links in context documents resolve - Ensure tracks.md status matches git branch state ## Session Continuity Conductor supports multi-session development through context persistence: ### Starting a New Session 1. Read index.md to orient yourself 2. Check tracks.md for active work 3. Review relevant track's plan.md for current task 4. Verify context artifacts are current ### Ending a Session 1. Update plan.md with current progress 2. Note any blockers or decisions made 3. Commit in-progress work with clear status 4. Update tracks.md if status changed ### Handling Interruptions If interrupted mid-task: 1. Mark task as `[~]` with note about stopping point 2. Commit work-in-progress to feature branch 3. Document any uncommitted decisions in plan.md ## Best Practices 1. **Read context first**: Always read relevant artifacts before starting work 2. **Small updates**: Make incremental context changes, not massive rewrites 3. **Link decisions**: Reference context when making implementation choices 4. **Version context**: Commit context changes alongside code changes 5. **Review context**: Include context artifact reviews in code reviews 6. **Validate regularly**: Run context validation checklist before major work 7. **Communicate changes**: Notify team when context artifacts change significantly 8. **Preserve history**: Use git to track context evolution over time 9. **Question staleness**: If context feels wrong, investigate and update 10. **Keep it actionable**: Every context item should inform a decision or behavior
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered