Skip to main content
EVOKORE// BROWSE
>

./browse/prompts

103 NODES
πŸ“textβ€’3 hours ago

Narrative Control Prompt: Exhaustive System Architecture & Feature Reverse-Engineering

Narrative Control Prompt: Exhaustive System Architecture & Feature Reverse-Engineering User centric prompting for analyzing inspiration pages or instructing on internal analysis cycles

architecture
⭐1
# Narrative Control Prompt: Exhaustive System Architecture & Feature Reverse-Engineering You are an **Expert Enterprise Architect, Product Director, and Lead Engineer**. Your goal is to thoroughly analyze the provided documentation to architect a full-scale, competitive enterprise application. You must deconstruct the feature described in the content into **extensive, granular technical specifications** across multiple engineering disciplines. **CRITICAL INSTRUCTIONS**: - **DO NOT SUMMARIZE**. Be exhaustive. - For every category below, aim to list **10+ specific items** if possible. - Brainstorm every possible implication, edge case, and requirement derived from or inspired by the text. - If the text mentions a "search" feature, break it down into: Indexing, Query Parsing, UI Widgets, Highlighting, Filtering, Sort Logic, Caching, etc. Please output the analysis in the following Markdown format: # 1. Product Strategy & Scope * **Feature Name**: * **Core Value Proposition**: [Deep dive into why this exists] * **User Personas**: [List as many as applicable: e.g. Admin, Power User, Viewer, Auditor, API Consumer...] * **User Stories**: [Extensive list of 10+ granular user stories e.g. "As a User, I want to..."] * **Competitive Differentiators**: [What makes this specific implementation valuable?] # 2. Design & User Experience (UX/UI) * **Key Interface Components**: [List 10+ atoms/molecules: e.g. Data Grid, Filter Chips, Modals, Tooltips, Empty States, Toasts, Dropdowns...] * **Interaction Patterns**: [List 10+ patterns: e.g. Drag-and-drop, Double-click to edit, Hover states, Keyboard shortcuts, Infinite scroll...] * **Visual States**: [List all states: Loading, Success, Error, Warning, Partial Data, Offline...] * **Accessibility (a11y)**: [List 10+ checks: Contrast, ARIA labels, Focus management, Screen reader support, Resizing...] # 3. Frontend Engineering * **State Management**: [List 10+ state atoms: Upload progress %, Selected ID list, Sort order, Filter criteria, Current user permissions...] * **API Interactions**: [List 10+ potential endpoints: GET/POST/PUT/DELETE for main entities, Lookups, Search, Validation...] * **Component Architecture**: [List 10+ React/Vue components: Container, Presentation, Utility wrappers, HoC...] * **Client-Side Logic**: [Validation rules, Formatting (Dates/Currency), Debouncing, Caching...] # 4. Backend Engineering * **Data Models**: [List 10+ fields/entities: Table structure, Foreign keys, Indexes, JSONB fields, Audit columns...] * **API Specification**: [Detailed endpoint contract: Header requirements, Query params, Body schema, Error codes...] * **Business Logic**: [List 10+ rules: Permission checks, Data transformation, Workflows, Triggers, Notifications...] * **Security & Permissions**: [List 10+ checks: RBAC roles, Field-level security, API Rate limiting, CSRF protection...] # 5. Infrastructure & DevOps * **Storage Requirements**: [S3 buckets, Database types (SQL/NoSQL), Redis for cache, CDNs...] * **Compute Needs**: [Async workers, Scheduled cron jobs, Serverless functions, Container specs...] * **Background Jobs**: [List 10+ potential jobs: Email sending, File conversion, Indexing, Cleanup, Analytics aggregation...] * **Observability**: [Metrics to track: API latency, Error rates, Disk usage, Active users...] # 6. Quality Assurance (QA) * **Test Scenarios**: [List 10+ happy path scenarios] * **Edge Cases**: [List 10+ negative/edge cases: Network fail, Giant files, Concurrent edits, Invalid chars...] * **Performance Metrics**: [Specific SLAs: <200ms API, <1s Page load, 99.9% Uptime...] * **Security Testing**: [Pen-test vectors: XSS injection input, SQL injection, IDOR...] # 7. Documentation & Onboarding * **User Guides Needed**: [List 10+ articles to write based on this feature] * **Contextual Help**: [List 10+ places for Tooltips, Tours, Helper text...] * **API Documentation**: [Swagger/OpenAPI requirements] # 8. Implementation Roadmap * **Phase 1 (MVP)**: [List 10+ must-have tasks] * **Phase 2 (Enhanced)**: [List 10+ nice-to-have features] * **Phase 3 (Scale)**: [Optimization and enterprise hardening] --- **Context**: The content below is raw markdown from a help guide.
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ“textβ€’3 hours ago

Narrative Control Prompt Exhaustive System Architecture & Feature Reverse-Engineering

Narrative Control Prompt: Exhaustive System Architecture & Feature Reverse-Engineering User concentric prompting for analyzing inspiration pages or instructing on internal analysis cycles

architecture
⭐1
# Narrative Control Prompt: Exhaustive System Architecture & Feature Reverse-Engineering You are an **Expert Enterprise Architect, Product Director, and Lead Engineer**. Your goal is to thoroughly analyze the provided documentation to architect a full-scale, competitive enterprise application. You must deconstruct the feature described in the content into **extensive, granular technical specifications** across multiple engineering disciplines. **CRITICAL INSTRUCTIONS**: - **DO NOT SUMMARIZE**. Be exhaustive. - For every category below, aim to list **10+ specific items** if possible. - Brainstorm every possible implication, edge case, and requirement derived from or inspired by the text. - If the text mentions a "search" feature, break it down into: Indexing, Query Parsing, UI Widgets, Highlighting, Filtering, Sort Logic, Caching, etc. Please output the analysis in the following Markdown format: # 1. Product Strategy & Scope * **Feature Name**: * **Core Value Proposition**: [Deep dive into why this exists] * **User Personas**: [List as many as applicable: e.g. Admin, Power User, Viewer, Auditor, API Consumer...] * **User Stories**: [Extensive list of 10+ granular user stories e.g. "As a User, I want to..."] * **Competitive Differentiators**: [What makes this specific implementation valuable?] # 2. Design & User Experience (UX/UI) * **Key Interface Components**: [List 10+ atoms/molecules: e.g. Data Grid, Filter Chips, Modals, Tooltips, Empty States, Toasts, Dropdowns...] * **Interaction Patterns**: [List 10+ patterns: e.g. Drag-and-drop, Double-click to edit, Hover states, Keyboard shortcuts, Infinite scroll...] * **Visual States**: [List all states: Loading, Success, Error, Warning, Partial Data, Offline...] * **Accessibility (a11y)**: [List 10+ checks: Contrast, ARIA labels, Focus management, Screen reader support, Resizing...] # 3. Frontend Engineering * **State Management**: [List 10+ state atoms: Upload progress %, Selected ID list, Sort order, Filter criteria, Current user permissions...] * **API Interactions**: [List 10+ potential endpoints: GET/POST/PUT/DELETE for main entities, Lookups, Search, Validation...] * **Component Architecture**: [List 10+ React/Vue components: Container, Presentation, Utility wrappers, HoC...] * **Client-Side Logic**: [Validation rules, Formatting (Dates/Currency), Debouncing, Caching...] # 4. Backend Engineering * **Data Models**: [List 10+ fields/entities: Table structure, Foreign keys, Indexes, JSONB fields, Audit columns...] * **API Specification**: [Detailed endpoint contract: Header requirements, Query params, Body schema, Error codes...] * **Business Logic**: [List 10+ rules: Permission checks, Data transformation, Workflows, Triggers, Notifications...] * **Security & Permissions**: [List 10+ checks: RBAC roles, Field-level security, API Rate limiting, CSRF protection...] # 5. Infrastructure & DevOps * **Storage Requirements**: [S3 buckets, Database types (SQL/NoSQL), Redis for cache, CDNs...] * **Compute Needs**: [Async workers, Scheduled cron jobs, Serverless functions, Container specs...] * **Background Jobs**: [List 10+ potential jobs: Email sending, File conversion, Indexing, Cleanup, Analytics aggregation...] * **Observability**: [Metrics to track: API latency, Error rates, Disk usage, Active users...] # 6. Quality Assurance (QA) * **Test Scenarios**: [List 10+ happy path scenarios] * **Edge Cases**: [List 10+ negative/edge cases: Network fail, Giant files, Concurrent edits, Invalid chars...] * **Performance Metrics**: [Specific SLAs: <200ms API, <1s Page load, 99.9% Uptime...] * **Security Testing**: [Pen-test vectors: XSS injection input, SQL injection, IDOR...] # 7. Documentation & Onboarding * **User Guides Needed**: [List 10+ articles to write based on this feature] * **Contextual Help**: [List 10+ places for Tooltips, Tours, Helper text...] * **API Documentation**: [Swagger/OpenAPI requirements] # 8. Implementation Roadmap * **Phase 1 (MVP)**: [List 10+ must-have tasks] * **Phase 2 (Enhanced)**: [List 10+ nice-to-have features] * **Phase 3 (Scale)**: [Optimization and enterprise hardening] --- **Context**: The content below is raw markdown from a help guide.
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ“textβ€’6 months ago

ARCH-AEP Tiered Remediation Cycle

Run a scope-locked remediation cycle that normalizes findings, revalidates them in parallel, and clears tiers with verification evidence.

architecture
⭐1
# ARCH-AEP Tiered Remediation Cycle Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this workflow when you need an orchestrated engineering review cycle with strict scope lock, tiered execution, and audit-grade evidence. ## Use this when - Large remediation efforts spanning multiple PRs - Parallel specialist review with shared backlog authority - Tracking verification evidence through closure ## Expected outcomes - Scope changes are controlled instead of creeping mid-cycle - Severity tiers drive remediation order predictably - Verification evidence is treated as part of done ## Source synthesis - CHELATEDAI/docs/ARCH AGENTIC ENGINEERING AND PLANNING/workflow.md (https://github.com/mattmre/CHELATEDAI/blob/main/docs/ARCH%20AGENTIC%20ENGINEERING%20AND%20PLANNING/workflow.md) - CHELATEDAI/docs/ARCH AGENTIC ENGINEERING AND PLANNING/orchestrator-briefing.md (https://github.com/mattmre/CHELATEDAI/blob/main/docs/ARCH%20AGENTIC%20ENGINEERING%20AND%20PLANNING/orchestrator-briefing.md) ## Dedupe notes Condenses the core ARCH-AEP workflow and briefing docs into a single remediation-cycle entry instead of importing both separately. ## Source excerpts ### CHELATEDAI/docs/ARCH AGENTIC ENGINEERING AND PLANNING/workflow.md ## Workflow (ARCH phase) 1. Scope lock - Define PR range and time window. - Freeze inputs (refinement report + framework + PR list). 2. Discovery + normalization - Orchestrator ingests `agentic-review-framework.md` and the latest refinement report. - Normalize all findings into a single backlog with unique IDs. - De-duplicate, merge overlaps, and assign provisional severity. - Record backlog in `docs/ARCH AGENTIC ENGINEERING AND PLANNING/backlog-YYYY-MM-DD.md`. 3. Parallel re-validation - Spawn specialist agents to re-validate findings against current main. - Each agent must attach exact file paths and line ranges. - Propose the smallest safe fix, acceptance criteria, and effort sizing (S/M/L). 4. Architecture and planning synthesis - Orchestrator merges validated findings into a master backlog. - Re-score and re-rank using the sorting model. - Identify dependency chains and blockers. ### CHELATEDAI/docs/ARCH AGENTIC ENGINEERING AND PLANNING/orchestrator-briefing.md Purpose: Quick reference for the ARCH-AEP documentation set, plus the narrative to start a new session. Full file index: `docs/INDEX.md` ## What Exists In This Folder - `README.md`: narrative overview and intent for ARCH-AEP. - `workflow.md`: end-to-end workflow specification with phases, guardrails, and enhancements. - `templates.md`: ID and branch conventions, tracker table format, and status log. - `backlog-template.md`: template for the master backlog file. - `backlog-index.md`: index of backlog files. - `next-session.md`: short handoff checklist for resuming work. - `phase-planning.md`: long-running planning record for the current cycle. - `schedule-and-tracking.md`: cadence, gates, and milestone tracking. - `agent-learning.md`: cross-session learnings and reusable patterns. - `change-log.md`: scope/defer decisions with audit context. - `risk-memo-template.md`: Critical/High risk memo template. - `risk-memos/README.md`: storage location for risk memos. - `phase-summary-template.md`: template for per-PR or per-phase summaries. - `phase-summaries/README.md`: storage location for phase summaries. - `verification-log.md`: test/build evidence mirror for PRs. - `tracker-pointer.md`: pointer to the active tracker file. - `tracker-index.md`: index of tracker files. - `scope-lock-t ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ“textβ€’6 months ago

PR Merge Boundary Validation Runbook

Validate chained pull requests at each merge boundary with explicit checks, stale-approval handling, and rollback awareness.

devops
⭐1
# PR Merge Boundary Validation Runbook Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this runbook when a merge sequence spans dependent pull requests and each boundary needs fresh validation. ## Use this when - Managing dependency-chained pull requests - Refreshing stale approvals near merge time - Reducing merge surprises through checkpoint validation ## Expected outcomes - Each merge boundary has a concrete verification step - Review freshness stays visible as branches evolve - Rollback planning is captured before the merge happens ## Source synthesis - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/PR_MERGE_RUNBOOK.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/PR_MERGE_RUNBOOK.md) ## Dedupe notes Keeps the merge-boundary validation concept separate from more general workflow or orchestration docs. ## Source excerpts ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/PR_MERGE_RUNBOOK.md Operator runbook for reliable merges and context-rot prevention. ## Pre-merge Checklist - [ ] PR scope matches approved plan - [ ] PR description is filled using `.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md` - [ ] PR metadata automation check (`scripts/validate-pr-metadata.js`) is passing for pull_request CI runs - [ ] Required tests pass locally/CI - [ ] Docs updated for user-facing behavior changes - [ ] Release-impacting changes called out - [ ] Follow-up issues captured (if any) ## Required Checks by Change Type Use this as the minimum check set before approval and merge: | Change type | Required checks | | --- | --- | | Docs-only changes | `node test-docs-canonical-links.js` | | Ops/docs process changes (`docs/PR_MERGE_RUNBOOK.md`, `next-session.md`, orchestration docs) | `node test-ops-docs-validation.js` and `node test-docs-canonical-links.js` | | Source/tooling/config changes (`src/`, `scripts/`, workflow/config files) | Relevant targeted tests for touched area plus CI-required suite | | Release-flow changes | `node test-npm-release-flow-validation.js` plus docs/link checks | If a PR spans multiple change types, run the union of required checks. ## Reviewer Responsibilities - Confirm PR scope and dependency assumptions are explicit in description. - Confirm PR metadata fields from `.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md` are complete. - Verify required checks for each change type are attached in PR evidence. - Block approval if dependency base PR is not merged or branch is stale. - Approve only the current chain head; do not pre-approve non-head dependent PRs. - Confirm all review conversations are resolved before final approval. - Ensure merge strategy and rollback notes are documented for risky changes. ## Merge Steps 1. Rebase or update branch with latest target branch. 2. Re-run required validations. 3. Confirm reviewer approvals and resolved conversations. 4. Merge via approved strategy. 5. Record merge commit/PR number in tracker. ## Merge-boundary Checkpoints At every dependency merge boundary (`base -> dependent`): 1. Rebase dependent PR branch on latest `main` immediately after parent merge. 2. Re-run required checks and attach updated evidence in PR metadata. 3. Revalidate approvals for the new head state (stale approvals must be refreshed). 4. Confirm merge-boundary revalidation notes are updated before merge. ## Merge-order Controls (Dependency Chain) 1. Define merge order explicitly in PR descriptions (`base -> dependent`). 2. Merge only the current chain head; hold dependents until parent merge is complete. 3. After each merge, rebase ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ€–system promptβ€’6 months ago

Cross-CLI MCP Config Sync

Keep Claude, Cursor, Gemini, and related CLI integrations aligned with a repeatable dry-run and apply workflow.

productivity
⭐1
# Cross-CLI MCP Config Sync Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this skill when multiple AI clients need the same MCP configuration without drifting out of sync. ## Use this when - Rolling out a shared MCP config to multiple clients - Previewing config changes before applying them - Standardizing developer setup across tools ## Expected outcomes - Cross-client MCP setup becomes easier to repeat - Dry-run and apply modes reduce accidental changes - Environment-specific details stay documented near the workflow ## Source synthesis - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/CLI_INTEGRATION.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/CLI_INTEGRATION.md) ## Dedupe notes Uses the dedicated CLI integration guide as the canonical source for config sync instead of duplicating setup notes elsewhere. ## Source excerpts ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/CLI_INTEGRATION.md EVOKORE-MCP isn't just an MCP Server-Ò€—it also ships with natively integrated UI hooks designed to make your AI CLI experience (like Gemini CLI or Claude Code) significantly more powerful and transparent. ## 🍨 The Interactive Status Line When you connect EVOKORE-MCP to your AI Assistant, you can optionally enable the **EVOKORE Status Line**. Every time the AI finishes a thought or a tool execution, this hook intercepts the internal JSON payload and renders a beautiful, color-coded ASCII status bar at the bottom of your terminal showing: - **Location**: Your current working directory. - **Model Identity**: The exact LLM model currently loaded. - **Skill Count**: A live count of the MCP Agent Skills currently indexed in your library. - **Context Window Health**: A dynamic, color-coded progress bar showing exactly how many tokens you have consumed. --- ### 💜 Enabling in Gemini CLI Gemini CLI features a robust native hook engine. You can configure it to execute the EVOKORE Status Line immediately after every model response (`AfterModel`). **Step 1:** Locate your global settings file (`~/.gemini/settings.json`). **Step 2:** Ensure hooks are enabled, and add the `AfterModel` event array to the root of the JSON object: ```json { "enableHooks": true, "hooks": { "AfterModel": [ { "type": "command", "command": "node /absolute/path/to/EVOKORE-MCP/scripts/status.js" } ] } } ``` **Step 3:** Restart your Gemini CLI! --- ### 💜 Enabling in Claude Code Claude Code features an undocumented internal hook architecture that natively supports this status line. *(Note: Because this feature is currently undocumented by Anthropic, Claude Code's `doctor` command will display "Found 1 settings issue". This is perfectly normal and the status line will still execute successfully)*. **Step 1:** Locate your Claude settings file (`~/.claude/settings.json`). **Step 2:** Add the `statusLine` block to the root of the JSON object: ```json { "statusLine": { "type": "command", "command": "node /absolute/path/to/EVOKORE-MCP/scripts/status.js" } } ``` **Step 3:** Restart Claude Code. --- ### Òő ï¸ A Note on GitHub Copilot and Codex Microsoft's GitHub Copilot CLI and OpenAI's Codex CLI **do not natively support** these JSON hook configurations. If you want the EVOKORE Status Line to appear after commands in these tools, you must configure a native PowerShell/Bash alias wrapper around the CLI execution. **Example (PowerShell Profile):** ```powershell function copilot-evokore { gh copilot $args node "/absolute/path/to/EV ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ€–system promptβ€’6 months ago

Multi-Server MCP Aggregation Pattern

Aggregate tools across multiple MCP child servers with prefixing, collision avoidance, and routing rules that stay deterministic.

architecture
⭐1
# Multi-Server MCP Aggregation Pattern Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this pattern when an MCP host must broker tools from multiple child servers without sacrificing clarity or control. ## Use this when - Combining tools from several MCP backends - Avoiding tool-name collisions across providers - Keeping origin and routing visible during execution ## Expected outcomes - Server-prefixed names make tool origins obvious - Collisions are avoided without brittle manual renaming - Operators can extend the tool surface without losing determinism ## Source synthesis - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/AGENT33_IMPROVEMENT_INSTRUCTIONS.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/AGENT33_IMPROVEMENT_INSTRUCTIONS.md) - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/TOOLS_AND_DISCOVERY.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/TOOLS_AND_DISCOVERY.md) ## Dedupe notes Uses the improvement-transfer doc as the primary source, with the discovery doc covering prefixing and compatibility details. ## Source excerpts ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/AGENT33_IMPROVEMENT_INSTRUCTIONS.md > **Purpose**: Feed this file into Claude Code CLI when working on the Agent33 repo. It contains patterns, architectures, and capabilities proven in EVOKORE-MCP that Agent33 should adopt. --- ## 1. Multi-Server MCP Aggregation Pattern **What Agent33 lacks**: Agent33's MCP server (Phase 43) is a single-endpoint bridge. It doesn't aggregate multiple child MCP servers behind a unified namespace. **What to build**: A proxy layer that spawns and manages multiple child MCP servers from a single config file, presenting them as one unified tool surface. ### Implementation spec: ``` mcp.config.json { "servers": { "github": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-github"], "env": { "GITHUB_TOKEN": "${GITHUB_TOKEN}" } }, "fs": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem", "./"] }, "elevenlabs": { "command": "uvx", "args": ["elevenlabs-mcp"], "env": { "ELEVENLABS_API_KEY": "${ELEVENLABS_API_KEY}" } } } } ``` **Key patterns from EVOKORE**: - **Tool name prefixing**: Every proxied tool gets renamed `{serverId}_{originalName}` to prevent namespace collisions (e.g., `github_create_issue`, `fs_read_file`). First-registration-wins for duplicates. - **Environment interpolation**: `${VAR}` syntax in `env` blocks resolved ... ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/TOOLS_AND_DISCOVERY.md This page explains how EVOKORE presents tools, how proxy names are built, and how `discover_tools` changes the visible tool surface. ## Two tool populations ### Native EVOKORE tools These tools are defined by EVOKORE itself: - `docs_architect` - `skill_creator` - `resolve_workflow` - `search_skills` - `get_skill_help` - `discover_tools` Properties: - always available - always visible - not subject to proxy prefixing ### Proxied child-server tools These come from child servers in `mcp.config.json`. Current configured sources: - `github` - `fs` - optional `elevenlabs` Properties: - fetched from child servers at startup - renamed with server prefixes - governed by `permissions.yml` - routed through `ProxyManager` ## Prefixing and compatibility EVOKORE rewrites proxied tool names to: ```text ${serverId}_${tool.name} ``` Why this exists: - prevents tool-name collisions across child servers - makes origin obvious during execution and review - keeps exact-name routing deterministic Examples: | Upstream tool | EVOKORE-exposed tool | |---|---| | `read_file` from `fs` | `fs_read_file` | | `create_issue` from `github` | `github_create_issue` | ### Duplicate-prefixed name policy If two child registrations would create the same final prefixed name: - the first registrati ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ€–system promptβ€’6 months ago

Human-in-the-Loop Approval Token Workflow

Gate risky tool execution behind approval tokens so agents can retry safely after a human reviewer signs off.

security
⭐1
# Human-in-the-Loop Approval Token Workflow Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this workflow when autonomous execution needs a durable handoff from human review back into the agent loop. ## Use this when - Retrying a blocked tool call after approval - Adding a human checkpoint to sensitive actions - Reducing insecure workarounds around approval flows ## Expected outcomes - Approval becomes a reusable tokenized workflow - Agents resume work without losing execution context - Security controls stay explicit instead of being implied ## Source synthesis - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/V2_MULTI_AGENT_WORKFLOWS.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/V2_MULTI_AGENT_WORKFLOWS.md) - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/AGENT33_IMPROVEMENT_INSTRUCTIONS.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/AGENT33_IMPROVEMENT_INSTRUCTIONS.md) ## Dedupe notes Synthesizes the approval-token concept from the main workflow doc and the Agent33 improvement transfer notes. ## Source excerpts ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/V2_MULTI_AGENT_WORKFLOWS.md With EVOKORE-MCP v2.0 fully operational, we can now leverage 40+ proxied GitHub and Filesystem tools seamlessly within complex multi-agent workflows. The core architectural advancements include: ## 1. Dynamic Tool Prefixing & Indexing Instead of loading 40+ tools into an LLM's context window statically (which causes massive bloat), EVOKORE's `ProxyManager` boots child servers (like `@modelcontextprotocol/server-github` and `@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem`) and dynamically prefixes their tools (`github_create_issue`, `fs_write_file`). This prevents namespace collisions while keeping the tools accessible to native skills. ## 2. Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) Security Interceptor Automated multi-agent workflows involving sensitive endpoints (like GitHub write access or file deletion) are governed by EVOKORE's stateless `_evokore_approval_token` architecture. - When an agent attempts a restricted action, the tool call is intercepted and blocked. - The server returns an error explicitly commanding the agent to prompt the human for approval. - Upon approval, the agent retries the exact tool call with the injected token, securely fulfilling the workflow without severing the conversational context. ## 3. Active Skill Orchestration (Native Harnessing) Unlike v1.0 where skills merel ... ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/AGENT33_IMPROVEMENT_INSTRUCTIONS.md > **Purpose**: Feed this file into Claude Code CLI when working on the Agent33 repo. It contains patterns, architectures, and capabilities proven in EVOKORE-MCP that Agent33 should adopt. --- ## 1. Multi-Server MCP Aggregation Pattern **What Agent33 lacks**: Agent33's MCP server (Phase 43) is a single-endpoint bridge. It doesn't aggregate multiple child MCP servers behind a unified namespace. **What to build**: A proxy layer that spawns and manages multiple child MCP servers from a single config file, presenting them as one unified tool surface. ### Implementation spec: ``` mcp.config.json { "servers": { "github": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-github"], "env": { "GITHUB_TOKEN": "${GITHUB_TOKEN}" } }, "fs": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem", "./"] }, "elevenlabs": { "command": "uvx", "args": ["elevenlabs-mcp"], "env": { "ELEVENLABS_API_KEY": "${ELEVENLABS_API_KEY}" } } } } ``` **Key patterns from EVOKORE**: - **Tool name prefixing**: Every proxied tool gets renamed `{serverId}_{originalName}` to prevent namespace collisions (e.g., `github_create_issue`, `fs_read_file`). First-registration-wins for duplicates. - **Environment interpolation**: `${VAR}` syntax in `env` blocks resolved ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ“textβ€’6 months ago

Guardrailed Code Review Pipeline

Run a staged code review workflow with explicit risk assessment, reviewer handoffs, and merge gates.

coding
⭐1
# Guardrailed Code Review Pipeline Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this workflow when a change needs structured review evidence, clear approval stages, and a rollback-aware path to merge. ## Use this when - Multi-step L1 and L2 review signoff - High-risk changes that need audit trails - Standardizing reviewer decisions before merge ## Expected outcomes - Review states and approval checkpoints stay explicit - Risk assessment and evidence are captured before merge - The workflow remains small enough to reuse across repositories ## Source synthesis - AGENT33/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md) - AGENT33/docs/walkthroughs.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/walkthroughs.md) ## Dedupe notes Combines AGENT33 lifecycle mapping and operator walkthrough material into one review-oriented site entry. ## Source excerpts ### AGENT33/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md ### 4.1 Review Lifecycle States: - `draft -> ready -> l1-review -> l1-approved -> (optional l2-review -> l2-approved) -> approved -> merged` Main APIs: - `/v1/reviews/{id}/assess` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/assign-l1` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/l1` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/assign-l2` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/l2` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/approve` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/merge` ### AGENT33/docs/walkthroughs.md ## 4. Review Lifecycle (Two-Layer Signoff) Create review: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/ \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"task_id":"TASK-101","branch":"feat/docs-refresh","pr_number":12}' ``` Assess risk: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/assess \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"triggers":["api-public","security"]}' ``` Move to ready and assign L1: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/ready -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/assign-l1 -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" ``` Submit L1 decision: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/l1 \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"decision":"approved","issues":[],"comments":"L1 pass"}' ``` If L2 required, continue: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/assign-l2 -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/l2 \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"decision":"approved","issues":[],"commen ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

microservices-patterns

Design microservices architectures with service boundaries,

coding
⭐1
# Microservices Patterns Master microservices architecture patterns including service boundaries, inter-service communication, data management, and resilience patterns for building distributed systems. ## When to Use This Skill - Decomposing monoliths into microservices - Designing service boundaries and contracts - Implementing inter-service communication - Managing distributed data and transactions - Building resilient distributed systems - Implementing service discovery and load balancing - Designing event-driven architectures ## Core Concepts ### 1. Service Decomposition Strategies **By Business Capability** - Organize services around business functions - Each service owns its domain - Example: OrderService, PaymentService, InventoryService **By Subdomain (DDD)** - Core domain, supporting subdomains - Bounded contexts map to services - Clear ownership and responsibility **Strangler Fig Pattern** - Gradually extract from monolith - New functionality as microservices - Proxy routes to old/new systems ### 2. Communication Patterns **Synchronous (Request/Response)** - REST APIs - gRPC - GraphQL **Asynchronous (Events/Messages)** - Event streaming (Kafka) - Message queues (RabbitMQ, SQS) - Pub/Sub patterns ### 3. Data Management **Database Per Service** - Each service owns its data - No shared databases - Loose coupling **Saga Pattern** - Distributed transactions - Compensating actions - Eventual consistency ### 4. Resilience Patterns **Circuit Breaker** - Fail fast on repeated errors - Prevent cascade failures **Retry with Backoff** - Transient fault handling - Exponential backoff **Bulkhead** - Isolate resources - Limit impact of failures ## Service Decomposition Patterns ### Pattern 1: By Business Capability ```python # E-commerce example # Order Service class OrderService: """Handles order lifecycle.""" async def create_order(self, order_data: dict) -> Order: order = Order.create(order_data) # Publish event for other services await self.event_bus.publish( OrderCreatedEvent( order_id=order.id, customer_id=order.customer_id, items=order.items, total=order.total ) ) return order # Payment Service (separate service) class PaymentService: """Handles payment processing.""" async def process_payment(self, payment_request: PaymentRequest) -> PaymentResult: # Process payment result = await self.payment_gateway.charge( amount=payment_request.amount, customer=payment_request.customer_id ) if result.success: await self.event_bus.publish( PaymentCompletedEvent( order_id=payment_request.order_id, transaction_id=result.transaction_id ) ) return result # Inventory Service (separate service) class InventoryService: """Handles inventory management.""" async def reserve_items(self, order_id: str, items: List[OrderItem]) -> ReservationResult: # Check availability for item in items: available = await self.inventory_repo.get_available(item.product_id) if available < item.quantity: return ReservationResult( success=False, error=f"Insufficient inventory for {item.product_id}" ) # Reserve items reservation = await self.create_reservation(order_id, items) await self.event_bus.publish( InventoryReservedEvent( order_id=order_id, reservation_id=reservation.id ) ) return ReservationResult(success=True, reservation=reservation) ``` ### Pattern 2: API Gateway ```python from fastapi import FastAPI, HTTPException, Depends import httpx from circuitbreaker import circuit app = FastAPI() class APIGateway: """Central entry point for all client requests.""" def __init__(self): self.order_service_url = "http://order-service:8000" self.payment_service_url = "http://payment-service:8001" self.inventory_service_url = "http://inventory-service:8002" self.http_client = httpx.AsyncClient(timeout=5.0) @circuit(failure_threshold=5, recovery_timeout=30) async def call_order_service(self, path: str, method: str = "GET", **kwargs): """Call order service with circuit breaker.""" response = await self.http_client.request( method, f"{self.order_service_url}{path}", **kwargs ) response.raise_for_status() return response.json() async def create_order_aggregate(self, order_id: str) -> dict: """Aggregate data from multiple services.""" # Parallel requests order, payment, inventory = await asyncio.gather( self.call_order_service(f"/orders/{order_id}"), self.call_payment_service(f"/payments/order/{order_id}"), self.call_inventory_service(f"/reservations/order/{order_id}"), return_exceptions=True ) # Handle partial failures result = {"order": order} if not isinstance(payment, Exception): result["payment"] = payment if not isinstance(inventory, Exception): result["inventory"] = inventory return result @app.post("/api/orders") async def create_order( order_data: dict, gateway: APIGateway = Depends() ): """API Gateway endpoint.""" try: # Route to order service order = await gateway.call_order_service( "/orders", method="POST", json=order_data ) return {"order": order} except httpx.HTTPError as e: raise HTTPException(status_code=503, detail="Order service unavailable") ``` ## Communication Patterns ### Pattern 1: Synchronous REST Communication ```python # Service A calls Service B import httpx from tenacity import retry, stop_after_attempt, wait_exponential class ServiceClient: """HTTP client with retries and timeout.""" def __init__(self, base_url: str): self.base_url = base_url self.client = httpx.AsyncClient( timeout=httpx.Timeout(5.0, connect=2.0), limits=httpx.Limits(max_keepalive_connections=20) ) @retry( stop=stop_after_attempt(3), wait=wait_exponential(multiplier=1, min=2, max=10) ) async def get(self, path: str, **kwargs): """GET with automatic retries.""" response = await self.client.get(f"{self.base_url}{path}", **kwargs) response.raise_for_status() return response.json() async def post(self, path: str, **kwargs): """POST request.""" response = await self.client.post(f"{self.base_url}{path}", **kwargs) response.raise_for_status() return response.json() # Usage payment_client = ServiceClient("http://payment-service:8001") result = await payment_client.post("/payments", json=payment_data) ``` ### Pattern 2: Asynchronous Event-Driven ```python # Event-driven communication with Kafka from aiokafka import AIOKafkaProducer, AIOKafkaConsumer import json from dataclasses import dataclass, asdict from datetime import datetime @dataclass class DomainEvent: event_id: str event_type: str aggregate_id: str occurred_at: datetime data: dict class EventBus: """Event publishing and subscription.""" def __init__(self, bootstrap_servers: List[str]): self.bootstrap_servers = bootstrap_servers self.producer = None async def start(self): self.producer = AIOKafkaProducer( bootstrap_servers=self.bootstrap_servers, value_serializer=lambda v: json.dumps(v).encode() ) await self.producer.start() async def publish(self, event: DomainEvent): """Publish event to Kafka topic.""" topic = event.event_type await self.producer.send_and_wait( topic, value=asdict(event), key=event.aggregate_id.encode() ) async def subscribe(self, topic: str, handler: callable): """Subscribe to events.""" consumer = AIOKafkaConsumer( topic, bootstrap_servers=self.bootstrap_servers, value_deserializer=lambda v: json.loads(v.decode()), group_id="my-service" ) await consumer.start() try: async for message in consumer: event_data = message.value await handler(event_data) finally: await consumer.stop() # Order Service publishes event async def create_order(order_data: dict): order = await save_order(order_data) event = DomainEvent( event_id=str(uuid.uuid4()), event_type="OrderCreated", aggregate_id=order.id, occurred_at=datetime.now(), data={ "order_id": order.id, "customer_id": order.customer_id, "total": order.total } ) await event_bus.publish(event) # Inventory Service listens for OrderCreated async def handle_order_created(event_data: dict): """React to order creation.""" order_id = event_data["data"]["order_id"] items = event_data["data"]["items"] # Reserve inventory await reserve_inventory(order_id, items) ``` ### Pattern 3: Saga Pattern (Distributed Transactions) ```python # Saga orchestration for order fulfillment from enum import Enum from typing import List, Callable class SagaStep: """Single step in saga.""" def __init__( self, name: str, action: Callable, compensation: Callable ): self.name = name self.action = action self.compensation = compensation class SagaStatus(Enum): PENDING = "pending" COMPLETED = "completed" COMPENSATING = "compensating" FAILED = "failed" class OrderFulfillmentSaga: """Orchestrated saga for order fulfillment.""" def __init__(self): self.steps: List[SagaStep] = [ SagaStep( "create_order", action=self.create_order, compensation=self.cancel_order ), SagaStep( "reserve_inventory", action=self.reserve_inventory, compensation=self.release_inventory ), SagaStep( "process_payment", action=self.process_payment, compensation=self.refund_payment ), SagaStep( "confirm_order", action=self.confirm_order, compensation=self.cancel_order_confirmation ) ] async def execute(self, order_data: dict) -> SagaResult: """Execute saga steps.""" completed_steps = [] context = {"order_data": order_data} try: for step in self.steps: # Execute step result = await step.action(context) if not result.success: # Compensate await self.compensate(completed_steps, context) return SagaResult( status=SagaStatus.FAILED, error=result.error ) completed_steps.append(step) context.update(result.data) return SagaResult(status=SagaStatus.COMPLETED, data=context) except Exception as e: # Compensate on error await self.compensate(completed_steps, context) return SagaResult(status=SagaStatus.FAILED, error=str(e)) async def compensate(self, completed_steps: List[SagaStep], context: dict): """Execute compensating actions in reverse order.""" for step in reversed(completed_steps): try: await step.compensation(context) except Exception as e: # Log compensation failure print(f"Compensation failed for {step.name}: {e}") # Step implementations async def create_order(self, context: dict) -> StepResult: order = await order_service.create(context["order_data"]) return StepResult(success=True, data={"order_id": order.id}) async def cancel_order(self, context: dict): await order_service.cancel(context["order_id"]) async def reserve_inventory(self, context: dict) -> StepResult: result = await inventory_service.reserve( context["order_id"], context["order_data"]["items"] ) return StepResult( success=result.success, data={"reservation_id": result.reservation_id} ) async def release_inventory(self, context: dict): await inventory_service.release(context["reservation_id"]) async def process_payment(self, context: dict) -> StepResult: result = await payment_service.charge( context["order_id"], context["order_data"]["total"] ) return StepResult( success=result.success, data={"transaction_id": result.transaction_id}, error=result.error ) async def refund_payment(self, context: dict): await payment_service.refund(context["transaction_id"]) ``` ## Resilience Patterns ### Circuit Breaker Pattern ```python from enum import Enum from datetime import datetime, timedelta from typing import Callable, Any class CircuitState(Enum): CLOSED = "closed" # Normal operation OPEN = "open" # Failing, reject requests HALF_OPEN = "half_open" # Testing if recovered class CircuitBreaker: """Circuit breaker for service calls.""" def __init__( self, failure_threshold: int = 5, recovery_timeout: int = 30, success_threshold: int = 2 ): self.failure_threshold = failure_threshold self.recovery_timeout = recovery_timeout self.success_threshold = success_threshold self.failure_count = 0 self.success_count = 0 self.state = CircuitState.CLOSED self.opened_at = None async def call(self, func: Callable, *args, **kwargs) -> Any: """Execute function with circuit breaker.""" if self.state == CircuitState.OPEN: if self._should_attempt_reset(): self.state = CircuitState.HALF_OPEN else: raise CircuitBreakerOpenError("Circuit breaker is open") try: result = await func(*args, **kwargs) self._on_success() return result except Exception as e: self._on_failure() raise def _on_success(self): """Handle successful call.""" self.failure_count = 0 if self.state == CircuitState.HALF_OPEN: self.success_count += 1 if self.success_count >= self.success_threshold: self.state = CircuitState.CLOSED self.success_count = 0 def _on_failure(self): """Handle failed call.""" self.failure_count += 1 if self.failure_count >= self.failure_threshold: self.state = CircuitState.OPEN self.opened_at = datetime.now() if self.state == CircuitState.HALF_OPEN: self.state = CircuitState.OPEN self.opened_at = datetime.now() def _should_attempt_reset(self) -> bool: """Check if enough time passed to try again.""" return ( datetime.now() - self.opened_at > timedelta(seconds=self.recovery_timeout) ) # Usage breaker = CircuitBreaker(failure_threshold=5, recovery_timeout=30) async def call_payment_service(payment_data: dict): return await breaker.call( payment_client.process_payment, payment_data ) ``` ## Resources - **references/service-decomposition-guide.md**: Breaking down monoliths - **references/communication-patterns.md**: Sync vs async patterns - **references/saga-implementation.md**: Distributed transactions - **assets/circuit-breaker.py**: Production circuit breaker - **assets/event-bus-template.py**: Kafka event bus implementation - **assets/api-gateway-template.py**: Complete API gateway ## Best Practices 1. **Service Boundaries**: Align with business capabilities 2. **Database Per Service**: No shared databases 3. **API Contracts**: Versioned, backward compatible 4. **Async When Possible**: Events over direct calls 5. **Circuit Breakers**: Fail fast on service failures 6. **Distributed Tracing**: Track requests across services 7. **Service Registry**: Dynamic service discovery 8. **Health Checks**: Liveness and readiness probes ## Common Pitfalls - **Distributed Monolith**: Tightly coupled services - **Chatty Services**: Too many inter-service calls - **Shared Databases**: Tight coupling through data - **No Circuit Breakers**: Cascade failures - **Synchronous Everything**: Tight coupling, poor resilience - **Premature Microservices**: Starting with microservices - **Ignoring Network Failures**: Assuming reliable network - **No Compensation Logic**: Can't undo failed transactions
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

defi-protocol-templates

Implement DeFi protocols with production-ready templates for

coding
⭐1
# DeFi Protocol Templates Production-ready templates for common DeFi protocols including staking, AMMs, governance, lending, and flash loans. ## When to Use This Skill - Building staking platforms with reward distribution - Implementing AMM (Automated Market Maker) protocols - Creating governance token systems - Developing lending/borrowing protocols - Integrating flash loan functionality - Launching yield farming platforms ## Staking Contract ```solidity // SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT pragma solidity ^0.8.0; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/IERC20.sol"; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/security/ReentrancyGuard.sol"; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol"; contract StakingRewards is ReentrancyGuard, Ownable { IERC20 public stakingToken; IERC20 public rewardsToken; uint256 public rewardRate = 100; // Rewards per second uint256 public lastUpdateTime; uint256 public rewardPerTokenStored; mapping(address => uint256) public userRewardPerTokenPaid; mapping(address => uint256) public rewards; mapping(address => uint256) public balances; uint256 private _totalSupply; event Staked(address indexed user, uint256 amount); event Withdrawn(address indexed user, uint256 amount); event RewardPaid(address indexed user, uint256 reward); constructor(address _stakingToken, address _rewardsToken) { stakingToken = IERC20(_stakingToken); rewardsToken = IERC20(_rewardsToken); } modifier updateReward(address account) { rewardPerTokenStored = rewardPerToken(); lastUpdateTime = block.timestamp; if (account != address(0)) { rewards[account] = earned(account); userRewardPerTokenPaid[account] = rewardPerTokenStored; } _; } function rewardPerToken() public view returns (uint256) { if (_totalSupply == 0) { return rewardPerTokenStored; } return rewardPerTokenStored + ((block.timestamp - lastUpdateTime) * rewardRate * 1e18) / _totalSupply; } function earned(address account) public view returns (uint256) { return (balances[account] * (rewardPerToken() - userRewardPerTokenPaid[account])) / 1e18 + rewards[account]; } function stake(uint256 amount) external nonReentrant updateReward(msg.sender) { require(amount > 0, "Cannot stake 0"); _totalSupply += amount; balances[msg.sender] += amount; stakingToken.transferFrom(msg.sender, address(this), amount); emit Staked(msg.sender, amount); } function withdraw(uint256 amount) public nonReentrant updateReward(msg.sender) { require(amount > 0, "Cannot withdraw 0"); _totalSupply -= amount; balances[msg.sender] -= amount; stakingToken.transfer(msg.sender, amount); emit Withdrawn(msg.sender, amount); } function getReward() public nonReentrant updateReward(msg.sender) { uint256 reward = rewards[msg.sender]; if (reward > 0) { rewards[msg.sender] = 0; rewardsToken.transfer(msg.sender, reward); emit RewardPaid(msg.sender, reward); } } function exit() external { withdraw(balances[msg.sender]); getReward(); } } ``` ## AMM (Automated Market Maker) ```solidity // SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT pragma solidity ^0.8.0; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/IERC20.sol"; contract SimpleAMM { IERC20 public token0; IERC20 public token1; uint256 public reserve0; uint256 public reserve1; uint256 public totalSupply; mapping(address => uint256) public balanceOf; event Mint(address indexed to, uint256 amount); event Burn(address indexed from, uint256 amount); event Swap(address indexed trader, uint256 amount0In, uint256 amount1In, uint256 amount0Out, uint256 amount1Out); constructor(address _token0, address _token1) { token0 = IERC20(_token0); token1 = IERC20(_token1); } function addLiquidity(uint256 amount0, uint256 amount1) external returns (uint256 shares) { token0.transferFrom(msg.sender, address(this), amount0); token1.transferFrom(msg.sender, address(this), amount1); if (totalSupply == 0) { shares = sqrt(amount0 * amount1); } else { shares = min( (amount0 * totalSupply) / reserve0, (amount1 * totalSupply) / reserve1 ); } require(shares > 0, "Shares = 0"); _mint(msg.sender, shares); _update( token0.balanceOf(address(this)), token1.balanceOf(address(this)) ); emit Mint(msg.sender, shares); } function removeLiquidity(uint256 shares) external returns (uint256 amount0, uint256 amount1) { uint256 bal0 = token0.balanceOf(address(this)); uint256 bal1 = token1.balanceOf(address(this)); amount0 = (shares * bal0) / totalSupply; amount1 = (shares * bal1) / totalSupply; require(amount0 > 0 && amount1 > 0, "Amount0 or amount1 = 0"); _burn(msg.sender, shares); _update(bal0 - amount0, bal1 - amount1); token0.transfer(msg.sender, amount0); token1.transfer(msg.sender, amount1); emit Burn(msg.sender, shares); } function swap(address tokenIn, uint256 amountIn) external returns (uint256 amountOut) { require(tokenIn == address(token0) || tokenIn == address(token1), "Invalid token"); bool isToken0 = tokenIn == address(token0); (IERC20 tokenIn_, IERC20 tokenOut, uint256 resIn, uint256 resOut) = isToken0 ? (token0, token1, reserve0, reserve1) : (token1, token0, reserve1, reserve0); tokenIn_.transferFrom(msg.sender, address(this), amountIn); // 0.3% fee uint256 amountInWithFee = (amountIn * 997) / 1000; amountOut = (resOut * amountInWithFee) / (resIn + amountInWithFee); tokenOut.transfer(msg.sender, amountOut); _update( token0.balanceOf(address(this)), token1.balanceOf(address(this)) ); emit Swap(msg.sender, isToken0 ? amountIn : 0, isToken0 ? 0 : amountIn, isToken0 ? 0 : amountOut, isToken0 ? amountOut : 0); } function _mint(address to, uint256 amount) private { balanceOf[to] += amount; totalSupply += amount; } function _burn(address from, uint256 amount) private { balanceOf[from] -= amount; totalSupply -= amount; } function _update(uint256 res0, uint256 res1) private { reserve0 = res0; reserve1 = res1; } function sqrt(uint256 y) private pure returns (uint256 z) { if (y > 3) { z = y; uint256 x = y / 2 + 1; while (x < z) { z = x; x = (y / x + x) / 2; } } else if (y != 0) { z = 1; } } function min(uint256 x, uint256 y) private pure returns (uint256) { return x <= y ? x : y; } } ``` ## Governance Token ```solidity // SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT pragma solidity ^0.8.0; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/extensions/ERC20Votes.sol"; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol"; contract GovernanceToken is ERC20Votes, Ownable { constructor() ERC20("Governance Token", "GOV") ERC20Permit("Governance Token") { _mint(msg.sender, 1000000 * 10**decimals()); } function _afterTokenTransfer( address from, address to, uint256 amount ) internal override(ERC20Votes) { super._afterTokenTransfer(from, to, amount); } function _mint(address to, uint256 amount) internal override(ERC20Votes) { super._mint(to, amount); } function _burn(address account, uint256 amount) internal override(ERC20Votes) { super._burn(account, amount); } } contract Governor is Ownable { GovernanceToken public governanceToken; struct Proposal { uint256 id; address proposer; string description; uint256 forVotes; uint256 againstVotes; uint256 startBlock; uint256 endBlock; bool executed; mapping(address => bool) hasVoted; } uint256 public proposalCount; mapping(uint256 => Proposal) public proposals; uint256 public votingPeriod = 17280; // ~3 days in blocks uint256 public proposalThreshold = 100000 * 10**18; event ProposalCreated(uint256 indexed proposalId, address proposer, string description); event VoteCast(address indexed voter, uint256 indexed proposalId, bool support, uint256 weight); event ProposalExecuted(uint256 indexed proposalId); constructor(address _governanceToken) { governanceToken = GovernanceToken(_governanceToken); } function propose(string memory description) external returns (uint256) { require( governanceToken.getPastVotes(msg.sender, block.number - 1) >= proposalThreshold, "Proposer votes below threshold" ); proposalCount++; Proposal storage newProposal = proposals[proposalCount]; newProposal.id = proposalCount; newProposal.proposer = msg.sender; newProposal.description = description; newProposal.startBlock = block.number; newProposal.endBlock = block.number + votingPeriod; emit ProposalCreated(proposalCount, msg.sender, description); return proposalCount; } function vote(uint256 proposalId, bool support) external { Proposal storage proposal = proposals[proposalId]; require(block.number >= proposal.startBlock, "Voting not started"); require(block.number <= proposal.endBlock, "Voting ended"); require(!proposal.hasVoted[msg.sender], "Already voted"); uint256 weight = governanceToken.getPastVotes(msg.sender, proposal.startBlock); require(weight > 0, "No voting power"); proposal.hasVoted[msg.sender] = true; if (support) { proposal.forVotes += weight; } else { proposal.againstVotes += weight; } emit VoteCast(msg.sender, proposalId, support, weight); } function execute(uint256 proposalId) external { Proposal storage proposal = proposals[proposalId]; require(block.number > proposal.endBlock, "Voting not ended"); require(!proposal.executed, "Already executed"); require(proposal.forVotes > proposal.againstVotes, "Proposal failed"); proposal.executed = true; // Execute proposal logic here emit ProposalExecuted(proposalId); } } ``` ## Flash Loan ```solidity // SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT pragma solidity ^0.8.0; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/IERC20.sol"; interface IFlashLoanReceiver { function executeOperation( address asset, uint256 amount, uint256 fee, bytes calldata params ) external returns (bool); } contract FlashLoanProvider { IERC20 public token; uint256 public feePercentage = 9; // 0.09% fee event FlashLoan(address indexed borrower, uint256 amount, uint256 fee); constructor(address _token) { token = IERC20(_token); } function flashLoan( address receiver, uint256 amount, bytes calldata params ) external { uint256 balanceBefore = token.balanceOf(address(this)); require(balanceBefore >= amount, "Insufficient liquidity"); uint256 fee = (amount * feePercentage) / 10000; // Send tokens to receiver token.transfer(receiver, amount); // Execute callback require( IFlashLoanReceiver(receiver).executeOperation( address(token), amount, fee, params ), "Flash loan failed" ); // Verify repayment uint256 balanceAfter = token.balanceOf(address(this)); require(balanceAfter >= balanceBefore + fee, "Flash loan not repaid"); emit FlashLoan(receiver, amount, fee); } } // Example flash loan receiver contract FlashLoanReceiver is IFlashLoanReceiver { function executeOperation( address asset, uint256 amount, uint256 fee, bytes calldata params ) external override returns (bool) { // Decode params and execute arbitrage, liquidation, etc. // ... // Approve repayment IERC20(asset).approve(msg.sender, amount + fee); return true; } } ``` ## Resources - **references/staking.md**: Staking mechanics and reward distribution - **references/liquidity-pools.md**: AMM mathematics and pricing - **references/governance-tokens.md**: Governance and voting systems - **references/lending-protocols.md**: Lending/borrowing implementation - **references/flash-loans.md**: Flash loan security and use cases - **assets/staking-contract.sol**: Production staking template - **assets/amm-contract.sol**: Full AMM implementation - **assets/governance-token.sol**: Governance system - **assets/lending-protocol.sol**: Lending platform template ## Best Practices 1. **Use Established Libraries**: OpenZeppelin, Solmate 2. **Test Thoroughly**: Unit tests, integration tests, fuzzing 3. **Audit Before Launch**: Professional security audits 4. **Start Simple**: MVP first, add features incrementally 5. **Monitor**: Track contract health and user activity 6. **Upgradability**: Consider proxy patterns for upgrades 7. **Emergency Controls**: Pause mechanisms for critical issues ## Common DeFi Patterns - **Time-Weighted Average Price (TWAP)**: Price oracle resistance - **Liquidity Mining**: Incentivize liquidity provision - **Vesting**: Lock tokens with gradual release - **Multisig**: Require multiple signatures for critical operations - **Timelocks**: Delay execution of governance decisions
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

api-design-principles

Master REST and GraphQL API design principles to build intuitive,

coding
⭐1
# API Design Principles Master REST and GraphQL API design principles to build intuitive, scalable, and maintainable APIs that delight developers and stand the test of time. ## When to Use This Skill - Designing new REST or GraphQL APIs - Refactoring existing APIs for better usability - Establishing API design standards for your team - Reviewing API specifications before implementation - Migrating between API paradigms (REST to GraphQL, etc.) - Creating developer-friendly API documentation - Optimizing APIs for specific use cases (mobile, third-party integrations) ## Core Concepts ### 1. RESTful Design Principles **Resource-Oriented Architecture** - Resources are nouns (users, orders, products), not verbs - Use HTTP methods for actions (GET, POST, PUT, PATCH, DELETE) - URLs represent resource hierarchies - Consistent naming conventions **HTTP Methods Semantics:** - `GET`: Retrieve resources (idempotent, safe) - `POST`: Create new resources - `PUT`: Replace entire resource (idempotent) - `PATCH`: Partial resource updates - `DELETE`: Remove resources (idempotent) ### 2. GraphQL Design Principles **Schema-First Development** - Types define your domain model - Queries for reading data - Mutations for modifying data - Subscriptions for real-time updates **Query Structure:** - Clients request exactly what they need - Single endpoint, multiple operations - Strongly typed schema - Introspection built-in ### 3. API Versioning Strategies **URL Versioning:** ``` /api/v1/users /api/v2/users ``` **Header Versioning:** ``` Accept: application/vnd.api+json; version=1 ``` **Query Parameter Versioning:** ``` /api/users?version=1 ``` ## REST API Design Patterns ### Pattern 1: Resource Collection Design ```python # Good: Resource-oriented endpoints GET /api/users # List users (with pagination) POST /api/users # Create user GET /api/users/{id} # Get specific user PUT /api/users/{id} # Replace user PATCH /api/users/{id} # Update user fields DELETE /api/users/{id} # Delete user # Nested resources GET /api/users/{id}/orders # Get user's orders POST /api/users/{id}/orders # Create order for user # Bad: Action-oriented endpoints (avoid) POST /api/createUser POST /api/getUserById POST /api/deleteUser ``` ### Pattern 2: Pagination and Filtering ```python from typing import List, Optional from pydantic import BaseModel, Field class PaginationParams(BaseModel): page: int = Field(1, ge=1, description="Page number") page_size: int = Field(20, ge=1, le=100, description="Items per page") class FilterParams(BaseModel): status: Optional[str] = None created_after: Optional[str] = None search: Optional[str] = None class PaginatedResponse(BaseModel): items: List[dict] total: int page: int page_size: int pages: int @property def has_next(self) -> bool: return self.page < self.pages @property def has_prev(self) -> bool: return self.page > 1 # FastAPI endpoint example from fastapi import FastAPI, Query, Depends app = FastAPI() @app.get("/api/users", response_model=PaginatedResponse) async def list_users( page: int = Query(1, ge=1), page_size: int = Query(20, ge=1, le=100), status: Optional[str] = Query(None), search: Optional[str] = Query(None) ): # Apply filters query = build_query(status=status, search=search) # Count total total = await count_users(query) # Fetch page offset = (page - 1) * page_size users = await fetch_users(query, limit=page_size, offset=offset) return PaginatedResponse( items=users, total=total, page=page, page_size=page_size, pages=(total + page_size - 1) // page_size ) ``` ### Pattern 3: Error Handling and Status Codes ```python from fastapi import HTTPException, status from pydantic import BaseModel class ErrorResponse(BaseModel): error: str message: str details: Optional[dict] = None timestamp: str path: str class ValidationErrorDetail(BaseModel): field: str message: str value: Any # Consistent error responses STATUS_CODES = { "success": 200, "created": 201, "no_content": 204, "bad_request": 400, "unauthorized": 401, "forbidden": 403, "not_found": 404, "conflict": 409, "unprocessable": 422, "internal_error": 500 } def raise_not_found(resource: str, id: str): raise HTTPException( status_code=status.HTTP_404_NOT_FOUND, detail={ "error": "NotFound", "message": f"{resource} not found", "details": {"id": id} } ) def raise_validation_error(errors: List[ValidationErrorDetail]): raise HTTPException( status_code=status.HTTP_422_UNPROCESSABLE_ENTITY, detail={ "error": "ValidationError", "message": "Request validation failed", "details": {"errors": [e.dict() for e in errors]} } ) # Example usage @app.get("/api/users/{user_id}") async def get_user(user_id: str): user = await fetch_user(user_id) if not user: raise_not_found("User", user_id) return user ``` ### Pattern 4: HATEOAS (Hypermedia as the Engine of Application State) ```python class UserResponse(BaseModel): id: str name: str email: str _links: dict @classmethod def from_user(cls, user: User, base_url: str): return cls( id=user.id, name=user.name, email=user.email, _links={ "self": {"href": f"{base_url}/api/users/{user.id}"}, "orders": {"href": f"{base_url}/api/users/{user.id}/orders"}, "update": { "href": f"{base_url}/api/users/{user.id}", "method": "PATCH" }, "delete": { "href": f"{base_url}/api/users/{user.id}", "method": "DELETE" } } ) ``` ## GraphQL Design Patterns ### Pattern 1: Schema Design ```graphql # schema.graphql # Clear type definitions type User { id: ID! email: String! name: String! createdAt: DateTime! # Relationships orders(first: Int = 20, after: String, status: OrderStatus): OrderConnection! profile: UserProfile } type Order { id: ID! status: OrderStatus! total: Money! items: [OrderItem!]! createdAt: DateTime! # Back-reference user: User! } # Pagination pattern (Relay-style) type OrderConnection { edges: [OrderEdge!]! pageInfo: PageInfo! totalCount: Int! } type OrderEdge { node: Order! cursor: String! } type PageInfo { hasNextPage: Boolean! hasPreviousPage: Boolean! startCursor: String endCursor: String } # Enums for type safety enum OrderStatus { PENDING CONFIRMED SHIPPED DELIVERED CANCELLED } # Custom scalars scalar DateTime scalar Money # Query root type Query { user(id: ID!): User users(first: Int = 20, after: String, search: String): UserConnection! order(id: ID!): Order } # Mutation root type Mutation { createUser(input: CreateUserInput!): CreateUserPayload! updateUser(input: UpdateUserInput!): UpdateUserPayload! deleteUser(id: ID!): DeleteUserPayload! createOrder(input: CreateOrderInput!): CreateOrderPayload! } # Input types for mutations input CreateUserInput { email: String! name: String! password: String! } # Payload types for mutations type CreateUserPayload { user: User errors: [Error!] } type Error { field: String message: String! } ``` ### Pattern 2: Resolver Design ```python from typing import Optional, List from ariadne import QueryType, MutationType, ObjectType from dataclasses import dataclass query = QueryType() mutation = MutationType() user_type = ObjectType("User") @query.field("user") async def resolve_user(obj, info, id: str) -> Optional[dict]: """Resolve single user by ID.""" return await fetch_user_by_id(id) @query.field("users") async def resolve_users( obj, info, first: int = 20, after: Optional[str] = None, search: Optional[str] = None ) -> dict: """Resolve paginated user list.""" # Decode cursor offset = decode_cursor(after) if after else 0 # Fetch users users = await fetch_users( limit=first + 1, # Fetch one extra to check hasNextPage offset=offset, search=search ) # Pagination has_next = len(users) > first if has_next: users = users[:first] edges = [ { "node": user, "cursor": encode_cursor(offset + i) } for i, user in enumerate(users) ] return { "edges": edges, "pageInfo": { "hasNextPage": has_next, "hasPreviousPage": offset > 0, "startCursor": edges[0]["cursor"] if edges else None, "endCursor": edges[-1]["cursor"] if edges else None }, "totalCount": await count_users(search=search) } @user_type.field("orders") async def resolve_user_orders(user: dict, info, first: int = 20) -> dict: """Resolve user's orders (N+1 prevention with DataLoader).""" # Use DataLoader to batch requests loader = info.context["loaders"]["orders_by_user"] orders = await loader.load(user["id"]) return paginate_orders(orders, first) @mutation.field("createUser") async def resolve_create_user(obj, info, input: dict) -> dict: """Create new user.""" try: # Validate input validate_user_input(input) # Create user user = await create_user( email=input["email"], name=input["name"], password=hash_password(input["password"]) ) return { "user": user, "errors": [] } except ValidationError as e: return { "user": None, "errors": [{"field": e.field, "message": e.message}] } ``` ### Pattern 3: DataLoader (N+1 Problem Prevention) ```python from aiodataloader import DataLoader from typing import List, Optional class UserLoader(DataLoader): """Batch load users by ID.""" async def batch_load_fn(self, user_ids: List[str]) -> List[Optional[dict]]: """Load multiple users in single query.""" users = await fetch_users_by_ids(user_ids) # Map results back to input order user_map = {user["id"]: user for user in users} return [user_map.get(user_id) for user_id in user_ids] class OrdersByUserLoader(DataLoader): """Batch load orders by user ID.""" async def batch_load_fn(self, user_ids: List[str]) -> List[List[dict]]: """Load orders for multiple users in single query.""" orders = await fetch_orders_by_user_ids(user_ids) # Group orders by user_id orders_by_user = {} for order in orders: user_id = order["user_id"] if user_id not in orders_by_user: orders_by_user[user_id] = [] orders_by_user[user_id].append(order) # Return in input order return [orders_by_user.get(user_id, []) for user_id in user_ids] # Context setup def create_context(): return { "loaders": { "user": UserLoader(), "orders_by_user": OrdersByUserLoader() } } ``` ## Best Practices ### REST APIs 1. **Consistent Naming**: Use plural nouns for collections (`/users`, not `/user`) 2. **Stateless**: Each request contains all necessary information 3. **Use HTTP Status Codes Correctly**: 2xx success, 4xx client errors, 5xx server errors 4. **Version Your API**: Plan for breaking changes from day one 5. **Pagination**: Always paginate large collections 6. **Rate Limiting**: Protect your API with rate limits 7. **Documentation**: Use OpenAPI/Swagger for interactive docs ### GraphQL APIs 1. **Schema First**: Design schema before writing resolvers 2. **Avoid N+1**: Use DataLoaders for efficient data fetching 3. **Input Validation**: Validate at schema and resolver levels 4. **Error Handling**: Return structured errors in mutation payloads 5. **Pagination**: Use cursor-based pagination (Relay spec) 6. **Deprecation**: Use `@deprecated` directive for gradual migration 7. **Monitoring**: Track query complexity and execution time ## Common Pitfalls - **Over-fetching/Under-fetching (REST)**: Fixed in GraphQL but requires DataLoaders - **Breaking Changes**: Version APIs or use deprecation strategies - **Inconsistent Error Formats**: Standardize error responses - **Missing Rate Limits**: APIs without limits are vulnerable to abuse - **Poor Documentation**: Undocumented APIs frustrate developers - **Ignoring HTTP Semantics**: POST for idempotent operations breaks expectations - **Tight Coupling**: API structure shouldn't mirror database schema ## Resources - **references/rest-best-practices.md**: Comprehensive REST API design guide - **references/graphql-schema-design.md**: GraphQL schema patterns and anti-patterns - **references/api-versioning-strategies.md**: Versioning approaches and migration paths - **assets/rest-api-template.py**: FastAPI REST API template - **assets/graphql-schema-template.graphql**: Complete GraphQL schema example - **assets/api-design-checklist.md**: Pre-implementation review checklist - **scripts/openapi-generator.py**: Generate OpenAPI specs from code
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

nft-standards

Implement NFT standards (ERC-721, ERC-1155) with proper metadata

coding
⭐1
# NFT Standards Master ERC-721 and ERC-1155 NFT standards, metadata best practices, and advanced NFT features. ## When to Use This Skill - Creating NFT collections (art, gaming, collectibles) - Implementing marketplace functionality - Building on-chain or off-chain metadata - Creating soulbound tokens (non-transferable) - Implementing royalties and revenue sharing - Developing dynamic/evolving NFTs ## ERC-721 (Non-Fungible Token Standard) ```solidity // SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT pragma solidity ^0.8.0; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC721/extensions/ERC721URIStorage.sol"; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC721/extensions/ERC721Enumerable.sol"; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol"; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Counters.sol"; contract MyNFT is ERC721URIStorage, ERC721Enumerable, Ownable { using Counters for Counters.Counter; Counters.Counter private _tokenIds; uint256 public constant MAX_SUPPLY = 10000; uint256 public constant MINT_PRICE = 0.08 ether; uint256 public constant MAX_PER_MINT = 20; constructor() ERC721("MyNFT", "MNFT") {} function mint(uint256 quantity) external payable { require(quantity > 0 && quantity <= MAX_PER_MINT, "Invalid quantity"); require(_tokenIds.current() + quantity <= MAX_SUPPLY, "Exceeds max supply"); require(msg.value >= MINT_PRICE * quantity, "Insufficient payment"); for (uint256 i = 0; i < quantity; i++) { _tokenIds.increment(); uint256 newTokenId = _tokenIds.current(); _safeMint(msg.sender, newTokenId); _setTokenURI(newTokenId, generateTokenURI(newTokenId)); } } function generateTokenURI(uint256 tokenId) internal pure returns (string memory) { // Return IPFS URI or on-chain metadata return string(abi.encodePacked("ipfs://QmHash/", Strings.toString(tokenId), ".json")); } // Required overrides function _beforeTokenTransfer( address from, address to, uint256 tokenId, uint256 batchSize ) internal override(ERC721, ERC721Enumerable) { super._beforeTokenTransfer(from, to, tokenId, batchSize); } function _burn(uint256 tokenId) internal override(ERC721, ERC721URIStorage) { super._burn(tokenId); } function tokenURI(uint256 tokenId) public view override(ERC721, ERC721URIStorage) returns (string memory) { return super.tokenURI(tokenId); } function supportsInterface(bytes4 interfaceId) public view override(ERC721, ERC721Enumerable) returns (bool) { return super.supportsInterface(interfaceId); } function withdraw() external onlyOwner { payable(owner()).transfer(address(this).balance); } } ``` ## ERC-1155 (Multi-Token Standard) ```solidity // SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT pragma solidity ^0.8.0; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC1155/ERC1155.sol"; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol"; contract GameItems is ERC1155, Ownable { uint256 public constant SWORD = 1; uint256 public constant SHIELD = 2; uint256 public constant POTION = 3; mapping(uint256 => uint256) public tokenSupply; mapping(uint256 => uint256) public maxSupply; constructor() ERC1155("ipfs://QmBaseHash/{id}.json") { maxSupply[SWORD] = 1000; maxSupply[SHIELD] = 500; maxSupply[POTION] = 10000; } function mint( address to, uint256 id, uint256 amount ) external onlyOwner { require(tokenSupply[id] + amount <= maxSupply[id], "Exceeds max supply"); _mint(to, id, amount, ""); tokenSupply[id] += amount; } function mintBatch( address to, uint256[] memory ids, uint256[] memory amounts ) external onlyOwner { for (uint256 i = 0; i < ids.length; i++) { require(tokenSupply[ids[i]] + amounts[i] <= maxSupply[ids[i]], "Exceeds max supply"); tokenSupply[ids[i]] += amounts[i]; } _mintBatch(to, ids, amounts, ""); } function burn( address from, uint256 id, uint256 amount ) external { require(from == msg.sender || isApprovedForAll(from, msg.sender), "Not authorized"); _burn(from, id, amount); tokenSupply[id] -= amount; } } ``` ## Metadata Standards ### Off-Chain Metadata (IPFS) ```json { "name": "NFT #1", "description": "Description of the NFT", "image": "ipfs://QmImageHash", "attributes": [ { "trait_type": "Background", "value": "Blue" }, { "trait_type": "Rarity", "value": "Legendary" }, { "trait_type": "Power", "value": 95, "display_type": "number", "max_value": 100 } ] } ``` ### On-Chain Metadata ```solidity contract OnChainNFT is ERC721 { struct Traits { uint8 background; uint8 body; uint8 head; uint8 rarity; } mapping(uint256 => Traits) public tokenTraits; function tokenURI(uint256 tokenId) public view override returns (string memory) { Traits memory traits = tokenTraits[tokenId]; string memory json = Base64.encode( bytes( string( abi.encodePacked( '{"name": "NFT #', Strings.toString(tokenId), '",', '"description": "On-chain NFT",', '"image": "data:image/svg+xml;base64,', generateSVG(traits), '",', '"attributes": [', '{"trait_type": "Background", "value": "', Strings.toString(traits.background), '"},', '{"trait_type": "Rarity", "value": "', getRarityName(traits.rarity), '"}', ']}' ) ) ) ); return string(abi.encodePacked("data:application/json;base64,", json)); } function generateSVG(Traits memory traits) internal pure returns (string memory) { // Generate SVG based on traits return "..."; } } ``` ## Royalties (EIP-2981) ```solidity import "@openzeppelin/contracts/interfaces/IERC2981.sol"; contract NFTWithRoyalties is ERC721, IERC2981 { address public royaltyRecipient; uint96 public royaltyFee = 500; // 5% constructor() ERC721("Royalty NFT", "RNFT") { royaltyRecipient = msg.sender; } function royaltyInfo(uint256 tokenId, uint256 salePrice) external view override returns (address receiver, uint256 royaltyAmount) { return (royaltyRecipient, (salePrice * royaltyFee) / 10000); } function setRoyalty(address recipient, uint96 fee) external onlyOwner { require(fee <= 1000, "Royalty fee too high"); // Max 10% royaltyRecipient = recipient; royaltyFee = fee; } function supportsInterface(bytes4 interfaceId) public view override(ERC721, IERC165) returns (bool) { return interfaceId == type(IERC2981).interfaceId || super.supportsInterface(interfaceId); } } ``` ## Soulbound Tokens (Non-Transferable) ```solidity contract SoulboundToken is ERC721 { constructor() ERC721("Soulbound", "SBT") {} function _beforeTokenTransfer( address from, address to, uint256 tokenId, uint256 batchSize ) internal virtual override { require(from == address(0) || to == address(0), "Token is soulbound"); super._beforeTokenTransfer(from, to, tokenId, batchSize); } function mint(address to) external { uint256 tokenId = totalSupply() + 1; _safeMint(to, tokenId); } // Burn is allowed (user can destroy their SBT) function burn(uint256 tokenId) external { require(ownerOf(tokenId) == msg.sender, "Not token owner"); _burn(tokenId); } } ``` ## Dynamic NFTs ```solidity contract DynamicNFT is ERC721 { struct TokenState { uint256 level; uint256 experience; uint256 lastUpdated; } mapping(uint256 => TokenState) public tokenStates; function gainExperience(uint256 tokenId, uint256 exp) external { require(ownerOf(tokenId) == msg.sender, "Not token owner"); TokenState storage state = tokenStates[tokenId]; state.experience += exp; // Level up logic if (state.experience >= state.level * 100) { state.level++; } state.lastUpdated = block.timestamp; } function tokenURI(uint256 tokenId) public view override returns (string memory) { TokenState memory state = tokenStates[tokenId]; // Generate metadata based on current state return generateMetadata(tokenId, state); } function generateMetadata(uint256 tokenId, TokenState memory state) internal pure returns (string memory) { // Dynamic metadata generation return ""; } } ``` ## Gas-Optimized Minting (ERC721A) ```solidity import "erc721a/contracts/ERC721A.sol"; contract OptimizedNFT is ERC721A { uint256 public constant MAX_SUPPLY = 10000; uint256 public constant MINT_PRICE = 0.05 ether; constructor() ERC721A("Optimized NFT", "ONFT") {} function mint(uint256 quantity) external payable { require(_totalMinted() + quantity <= MAX_SUPPLY, "Exceeds max supply"); require(msg.value >= MINT_PRICE * quantity, "Insufficient payment"); _mint(msg.sender, quantity); } function _baseURI() internal pure override returns (string memory) { return "ipfs://QmBaseHash/"; } } ``` ## Resources - **references/erc721.md**: ERC-721 specification details - **references/erc1155.md**: ERC-1155 multi-token standard - **references/metadata-standards.md**: Metadata best practices - **references/enumeration.md**: Token enumeration patterns - **assets/erc721-contract.sol**: Production ERC-721 template - **assets/erc1155-contract.sol**: Production ERC-1155 template - **assets/metadata-schema.json**: Standard metadata format - **assets/metadata-uploader.py**: IPFS upload utility ## Best Practices 1. **Use OpenZeppelin**: Battle-tested implementations 2. **Pin Metadata**: Use IPFS with pinning service 3. **Implement Royalties**: EIP-2981 for marketplace compatibility 4. **Gas Optimization**: Use ERC721A for batch minting 5. **Reveal Mechanism**: Placeholder β†’ reveal pattern 6. **Enumeration**: Support walletOfOwner for marketplaces 7. **Whitelist**: Merkle trees for efficient whitelisting ## Marketplace Integration - OpenSea: ERC-721/1155, metadata standards - LooksRare: Royalty enforcement - Rarible: Protocol fees, lazy minting - Blur: Gas-optimized trading
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

data-storytelling

Transform data into compelling narratives using visualization,

data
⭐1
# Data Storytelling Transform raw data into compelling narratives that drive decisions and inspire action. ## When to Use This Skill - Presenting analytics to executives - Creating quarterly business reviews - Building investor presentations - Writing data-driven reports - Communicating insights to non-technical audiences - Making recommendations based on data ## Core Concepts ### 1. Story Structure ``` Setup β†’ Conflict β†’ Resolution Setup: Context and baseline Conflict: The problem or opportunity Resolution: Insights and recommendations ``` ### 2. Narrative Arc ``` 1. Hook: Grab attention with surprising insight 2. Context: Establish the baseline 3. Rising Action: Build through data points 4. Climax: The key insight 5. Resolution: Recommendations 6. Call to Action: Next steps ``` ### 3. Three Pillars | Pillar | Purpose | Components | | ------------- | -------- | -------------------------------- | | **Data** | Evidence | Numbers, trends, comparisons | | **Narrative** | Meaning | Context, causation, implications | | **Visuals** | Clarity | Charts, diagrams, highlights | ## Story Frameworks ### Framework 1: The Problem-Solution Story ```markdown # Customer Churn Analysis ## The Hook "We're losing $2.4M annually to preventable churn." ## The Context - Current churn rate: 8.5% (industry average: 5%) - Average customer lifetime value: $4,800 - 500 customers churned last quarter ## The Problem Analysis of churned customers reveals a pattern: - 73% churned within first 90 days - Common factor: < 3 support interactions - Low feature adoption in first month ## The Insight [Show engagement curve visualization] Customers who don't engage in the first 14 days are 4x more likely to churn. ## The Solution 1. Implement 14-day onboarding sequence 2. Proactive outreach at day 7 3. Feature adoption tracking ## Expected Impact - Reduce early churn by 40% - Save $960K annually - Payback period: 3 months ## Call to Action Approve $50K budget for onboarding automation. ``` ### Framework 2: The Trend Story ```markdown # Q4 Performance Analysis ## Where We Started Q3 ended with $1.2M MRR, 15% below target. Team morale was low after missed goals. ## What Changed [Timeline visualization] - Oct: Launched self-serve pricing - Nov: Reduced friction in signup - Dec: Added customer success calls ## The Transformation [Before/after comparison chart] | Metric | Q3 | Q4 | Change | |----------------|--------|--------|--------| | Trial β†’ Paid | 8% | 15% | +87% | | Time to Value | 14 days| 5 days | -64% | | Expansion Rate | 2% | 8% | +300% | ## Key Insight Self-serve + high-touch creates compound growth. Customers who self-serve AND get a success call have 3x higher expansion rate. ## Going Forward Double down on hybrid model. Target: $1.8M MRR by Q2. ``` ### Framework 3: The Comparison Story ```markdown # Market Opportunity Analysis ## The Question Should we expand into EMEA or APAC first? ## The Comparison [Side-by-side market analysis] ### EMEA - Market size: $4.2B - Growth rate: 8% - Competition: High - Regulatory: Complex (GDPR) - Language: Multiple ### APAC - Market size: $3.8B - Growth rate: 15% - Competition: Moderate - Regulatory: Varied - Language: Multiple ## The Analysis [Weighted scoring matrix visualization] | Factor | Weight | EMEA Score | APAC Score | | ----------- | ------ | ---------- | ---------- | | Market Size | 25% | 5 | 4 | | Growth | 30% | 3 | 5 | | Competition | 20% | 2 | 4 | | Ease | 25% | 2 | 3 | | **Total** | | **2.9** | **4.1** | ## The Recommendation APAC first. Higher growth, less competition. Start with Singapore hub (English, business-friendly). Enter EMEA in Year 2 with localization ready. ## Risk Mitigation - Timezone coverage: Hire 24/7 support - Cultural fit: Local partnerships - Payment: Multi-currency from day 1 ``` ## Visualization Techniques ### Technique 1: Progressive Reveal ```markdown Start simple, add layers: Slide 1: "Revenue is growing" [single line chart] Slide 2: "But growth is slowing" [add growth rate overlay] Slide 3: "Driven by one segment" [add segment breakdown] Slide 4: "Which is saturating" [add market share] Slide 5: "We need new segments" [add opportunity zones] ``` ### Technique 2: Contrast and Compare ```markdown Before/After: β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ BEFORE β”‚ AFTER β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ Process: 5 daysβ”‚ Process: 1 day β”‚ β”‚ Errors: 15% β”‚ Errors: 2% β”‚ β”‚ Cost: $50/unit β”‚ Cost: $20/unit β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ This/That (emphasize difference): β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ CUSTOMER A vs B β”‚ β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆ β”‚ β”‚ β–ˆβ–ˆ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ $45,000 β”‚ β”‚ $8,000 β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ LTV β”‚ β”‚ LTV β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚ β”‚ Onboarded No onboarding β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ ``` ### Technique 3: Annotation and Highlight ```python import matplotlib.pyplot as plt import pandas as pd fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(12, 6)) # Plot the main data ax.plot(dates, revenue, linewidth=2, color='#2E86AB') # Add annotation for key events ax.annotate( 'Product Launch\n+32% spike', xy=(launch_date, launch_revenue), xytext=(launch_date, launch_revenue * 1.2), fontsize=10, arrowprops=dict(arrowstyle='->', color='#E63946'), color='#E63946' ) # Highlight a region ax.axvspan(growth_start, growth_end, alpha=0.2, color='green', label='Growth Period') # Add threshold line ax.axhline(y=target, color='gray', linestyle='--', label=f'Target: ${target:,.0f}') ax.set_title('Revenue Growth Story', fontsize=14, fontweight='bold') ax.legend() ``` ## Presentation Templates ### Template 1: Executive Summary Slide ``` β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ KEY INSIGHT β”‚ β”‚ ══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════│ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ "Customers who complete onboarding in week 1 β”‚ β”‚ have 3x higher lifetime value" β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ THE DATA β”‚ THE IMPLICATION β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ Week 1 completers: β”‚ βœ“ Prioritize onboarding UX β”‚ β”‚ β€’ LTV: $4,500 β”‚ βœ“ Add day-1 success milestones β”‚ β”‚ β€’ Retention: 85% β”‚ βœ“ Proactive week-1 outreach β”‚ β”‚ β€’ NPS: 72 β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ Investment: $75K β”‚ β”‚ Others: β”‚ Expected ROI: 8x β”‚ β”‚ β€’ LTV: $1,500 β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β€’ Retention: 45% β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β€’ NPS: 34 β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ ``` ### Template 2: Data Story Flow ``` Slide 1: THE HEADLINE "We can grow 40% faster by fixing onboarding" Slide 2: THE CONTEXT Current state metrics Industry benchmarks Gap analysis Slide 3: THE DISCOVERY What the data revealed Surprising finding Pattern identification Slide 4: THE DEEP DIVE Root cause analysis Segment breakdowns Statistical significance Slide 5: THE RECOMMENDATION Proposed actions Resource requirements Timeline Slide 6: THE IMPACT Expected outcomes ROI calculation Risk assessment Slide 7: THE ASK Specific request Decision needed Next steps ``` ### Template 3: One-Page Dashboard Story ```markdown # Monthly Business Review: January 2024 ## THE HEADLINE Revenue up 15% but CAC increasing faster than LTV ## KEY METRICS AT A GLANCE β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ MRR β”‚ NRR β”‚ CAC β”‚ LTV β”‚ β”‚ $125K β”‚ 108% β”‚ $450 β”‚ $2,200 β”‚ β”‚ β–²15% β”‚ β–²3% β”‚ β–²22% β”‚ β–²8% β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ ## WHAT'S WORKING βœ“ Enterprise segment growing 25% MoM βœ“ Referral program driving 30% of new logos βœ“ Support satisfaction at all-time high (94%) ## WHAT NEEDS ATTENTION βœ— SMB acquisition cost up 40% βœ— Trial conversion down 5 points βœ— Time-to-value increased by 3 days ## ROOT CAUSE [Mini chart showing SMB vs Enterprise CAC trend] SMB paid ads becoming less efficient. CPC up 35% while conversion flat. ## RECOMMENDATION 1. Shift $20K/mo from paid to content 2. Launch SMB self-serve trial 3. A/B test shorter onboarding ## NEXT MONTH'S FOCUS - Launch content marketing pilot - Complete self-serve MVP - Reduce time-to-value to < 7 days ``` ## Writing Techniques ### Headlines That Work ```markdown BAD: "Q4 Sales Analysis" GOOD: "Q4 Sales Beat Target by 23% - Here's Why" BAD: "Customer Churn Report" GOOD: "We're Losing $2.4M to Preventable Churn" BAD: "Marketing Performance" GOOD: "Content Marketing Delivers 4x ROI vs. Paid" Formula: [Specific Number] + [Business Impact] + [Actionable Context] ``` ### Transition Phrases ```markdown Building the narrative: β€’ "This leads us to ask..." β€’ "When we dig deeper..." β€’ "The pattern becomes clear when..." β€’ "Contrast this with..." Introducing insights: β€’ "The data reveals..." β€’ "What surprised us was..." β€’ "The inflection point came when..." β€’ "The key finding is..." Moving to action: β€’ "This insight suggests..." β€’ "Based on this analysis..." β€’ "The implication is clear..." β€’ "Our recommendation is..." ``` ### Handling Uncertainty ```markdown Acknowledge limitations: β€’ "With 95% confidence, we can say..." β€’ "The sample size of 500 shows..." β€’ "While correlation is strong, causation requires..." β€’ "This trend holds for [segment], though [caveat]..." Present ranges: β€’ "Impact estimate: $400K-$600K" β€’ "Confidence interval: 15-20% improvement" β€’ "Best case: X, Conservative: Y" ``` ## Best Practices ### Do's - **Start with the "so what"** - Lead with insight - **Use the rule of three** - Three points, three comparisons - **Show, don't tell** - Let data speak - **Make it personal** - Connect to audience goals - **End with action** - Clear next steps ### Don'ts - **Don't data dump** - Curate ruthlessly - **Don't bury the insight** - Front-load key findings - **Don't use jargon** - Match audience vocabulary - **Don't show methodology first** - Context, then method - **Don't forget the narrative** - Numbers need meaning ## Resources - [Storytelling with Data (Cole Nussbaumer)](https://www.storytellingwithdata.com/) - [The Pyramid Principle (Barbara Minto)](https://www.amazon.com/Pyramid-Principle-Logic-Writing-Thinking/dp/0273710516) - [Resonate (Nancy Duarte)](https://www.duarte.com/resonate/)
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

deployment-pipeline-design

Design multi-stage CI/CD pipelines with approval gates, security

coding
⭐1
# Deployment Pipeline Design Architecture patterns for multi-stage CI/CD pipelines with approval gates and deployment strategies. ## Purpose Design robust, secure deployment pipelines that balance speed with safety through proper stage organization and approval workflows. ## When to Use - Design CI/CD architecture - Implement deployment gates - Configure multi-environment pipelines - Establish deployment best practices - Implement progressive delivery ## Pipeline Stages ### Standard Pipeline Flow ``` β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ Build β”‚ β†’ β”‚ Test β”‚ β†’ β”‚ Staging β”‚ β†’ β”‚ Approveβ”‚ β†’ β”‚Productionβ”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ ``` ### Detailed Stage Breakdown 1. **Source** - Code checkout 2. **Build** - Compile, package, containerize 3. **Test** - Unit, integration, security scans 4. **Staging Deploy** - Deploy to staging environment 5. **Integration Tests** - E2E, smoke tests 6. **Approval Gate** - Manual approval required 7. **Production Deploy** - Canary, blue-green, rolling 8. **Verification** - Health checks, monitoring 9. **Rollback** - Automated rollback on failure ## Approval Gate Patterns ### Pattern 1: Manual Approval ```yaml # GitHub Actions production-deploy: needs: staging-deploy environment: name: production url: https://app.example.com runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - name: Deploy to production run: | # Deployment commands ``` ### Pattern 2: Time-Based Approval ```yaml # GitLab CI deploy:production: stage: deploy script: - deploy.sh production environment: name: production when: delayed start_in: 30 minutes only: - main ``` ### Pattern 3: Multi-Approver ```yaml # Azure Pipelines stages: - stage: Production dependsOn: Staging jobs: - deployment: Deploy environment: name: production resourceType: Kubernetes strategy: runOnce: preDeploy: steps: - task: ManualValidation@0 inputs: notifyUsers: "team-leads@example.com" instructions: "Review staging metrics before approving" ``` **Reference:** See `assets/approval-gate-template.yml` ## Deployment Strategies ### 1. Rolling Deployment ```yaml apiVersion: apps/v1 kind: Deployment metadata: name: my-app spec: replicas: 10 strategy: type: RollingUpdate rollingUpdate: maxSurge: 2 maxUnavailable: 1 ``` **Characteristics:** - Gradual rollout - Zero downtime - Easy rollback - Best for most applications ### 2. Blue-Green Deployment ```yaml # Blue (current) kubectl apply -f blue-deployment.yaml kubectl label service my-app version=blue # Green (new) kubectl apply -f green-deployment.yaml # Test green environment kubectl label service my-app version=green # Rollback if needed kubectl label service my-app version=blue ``` **Characteristics:** - Instant switchover - Easy rollback - Doubles infrastructure cost temporarily - Good for high-risk deployments ### 3. Canary Deployment ```yaml apiVersion: argoproj.io/v1alpha1 kind: Rollout metadata: name: my-app spec: replicas: 10 strategy: canary: steps: - setWeight: 10 - pause: { duration: 5m } - setWeight: 25 - pause: { duration: 5m } - setWeight: 50 - pause: { duration: 5m } - setWeight: 100 ``` **Characteristics:** - Gradual traffic shift - Risk mitigation - Real user testing - Requires service mesh or similar ### 4. Feature Flags ```python from flagsmith import Flagsmith flagsmith = Flagsmith(environment_key="API_KEY") if flagsmith.has_feature("new_checkout_flow"): # New code path process_checkout_v2() else: # Existing code path process_checkout_v1() ``` **Characteristics:** - Deploy without releasing - A/B testing - Instant rollback - Granular control ## Pipeline Orchestration ### Multi-Stage Pipeline Example ```yaml name: Production Pipeline on: push: branches: [main] jobs: build: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - name: Build application run: make build - name: Build Docker image run: docker build -t myapp:${{ github.sha }} . - name: Push to registry run: docker push myapp:${{ github.sha }} test: needs: build runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - name: Unit tests run: make test - name: Security scan run: trivy image myapp:${{ github.sha }} deploy-staging: needs: test runs-on: ubuntu-latest environment: name: staging steps: - name: Deploy to staging run: kubectl apply -f k8s/staging/ integration-test: needs: deploy-staging runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - name: Run E2E tests run: npm run test:e2e deploy-production: needs: integration-test runs-on: ubuntu-latest environment: name: production steps: - name: Canary deployment run: | kubectl apply -f k8s/production/ kubectl argo rollouts promote my-app verify: needs: deploy-production runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - name: Health check run: curl -f https://app.example.com/health - name: Notify team run: | curl -X POST ${{ secrets.SLACK_WEBHOOK }} \ -d '{"text":"Production deployment successful!"}' ``` ## Pipeline Best Practices 1. **Fail fast** - Run quick tests first 2. **Parallel execution** - Run independent jobs concurrently 3. **Caching** - Cache dependencies between runs 4. **Artifact management** - Store build artifacts 5. **Environment parity** - Keep environments consistent 6. **Secrets management** - Use secret stores (Vault, etc.) 7. **Deployment windows** - Schedule deployments appropriately 8. **Monitoring integration** - Track deployment metrics 9. **Rollback automation** - Auto-rollback on failures 10. **Documentation** - Document pipeline stages ## Rollback Strategies ### Automated Rollback ```yaml deploy-and-verify: steps: - name: Deploy new version run: kubectl apply -f k8s/ - name: Wait for rollout run: kubectl rollout status deployment/my-app - name: Health check id: health run: | for i in {1..10}; do if curl -sf https://app.example.com/health; then exit 0 fi sleep 10 done exit 1 - name: Rollback on failure if: failure() run: kubectl rollout undo deployment/my-app ``` ### Manual Rollback ```bash # List revision history kubectl rollout history deployment/my-app # Rollback to previous version kubectl rollout undo deployment/my-app # Rollback to specific revision kubectl rollout undo deployment/my-app --to-revision=3 ``` ## Monitoring and Metrics ### Key Pipeline Metrics - **Deployment Frequency** - How often deployments occur - **Lead Time** - Time from commit to production - **Change Failure Rate** - Percentage of failed deployments - **Mean Time to Recovery (MTTR)** - Time to recover from failure - **Pipeline Success Rate** - Percentage of successful runs - **Average Pipeline Duration** - Time to complete pipeline ### Integration with Monitoring ```yaml - name: Post-deployment verification run: | # Wait for metrics stabilization sleep 60 # Check error rate ERROR_RATE=$(curl -s "$PROMETHEUS_URL/api/v1/query?query=rate(http_errors_total[5m])" | jq '.data.result[0].value[1]') if (( $(echo "$ERROR_RATE > 0.01" | bc -l) )); then echo "Error rate too high: $ERROR_RATE" exit 1 fi ``` ## Reference Files - `references/pipeline-orchestration.md` - Complex pipeline patterns - `assets/approval-gate-template.yml` - Approval workflow templates ## Related Skills - `github-actions-templates` - For GitHub Actions implementation - `gitlab-ci-patterns` - For GitLab CI implementation - `secrets-management` - For secrets handling
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

task-coordination-strategies

Decompose complex tasks, design dependency graphs, and coordinate

coding
⭐1
# Task Coordination Strategies Strategies for decomposing complex tasks into parallelizable units, designing dependency graphs, writing effective task descriptions, and monitoring workload across agent teams. ## When to Use This Skill - Breaking down a complex task for parallel execution - Designing task dependency relationships (blockedBy/blocks) - Writing task descriptions with clear acceptance criteria - Monitoring and rebalancing workload across teammates - Identifying the critical path in a multi-task workflow ## Task Decomposition Strategies ### By Layer Split work by architectural layer: - Frontend components - Backend API endpoints - Database migrations/models - Test suites **Best for**: Full-stack features, vertical slices ### By Component Split work by functional component: - Authentication module - User profile module - Notification module **Best for**: Microservices, modular architectures ### By Concern Split work by cross-cutting concern: - Security review - Performance review - Architecture review **Best for**: Code reviews, audits ### By File Ownership Split work by file/directory boundaries: - `src/components/` β€” Implementer 1 - `src/api/` β€” Implementer 2 - `src/utils/` β€” Implementer 3 **Best for**: Parallel implementation, conflict avoidance ## Dependency Graph Design ### Principles 1. **Minimize chain depth** β€” Prefer wide, shallow graphs over deep chains 2. **Identify the critical path** β€” The longest chain determines minimum completion time 3. **Use blockedBy sparingly** β€” Only add dependencies that are truly required 4. **Avoid circular dependencies** β€” Task A blocks B blocks A is a deadlock ### Patterns **Independent (Best parallelism)**: ``` Task A ─┐ Task B ─┼─→ Integration Task C β”€β”˜ ``` **Sequential (Necessary dependencies)**: ``` Task A β†’ Task B β†’ Task C ``` **Diamond (Mixed)**: ``` β”Œβ†’ Task B ─┐ Task A ── β”œβ†’ Task D β””β†’ Task C β”€β”˜ ``` ### Using blockedBy/blocks ``` TaskCreate: { subject: "Build API endpoints" } β†’ Task #1 TaskCreate: { subject: "Build frontend components" } β†’ Task #2 TaskCreate: { subject: "Integration testing" } β†’ Task #3 TaskUpdate: { taskId: "3", addBlockedBy: ["1", "2"] } β†’ #3 waits for #1 and #2 ``` ## Task Description Best Practices Every task should include: 1. **Objective** β€” What needs to be accomplished (1-2 sentences) 2. **Owned Files** β€” Explicit list of files/directories this teammate may modify 3. **Requirements** β€” Specific deliverables or behaviors expected 4. **Interface Contracts** β€” How this work connects to other teammates' work 5. **Acceptance Criteria** β€” How to verify the task is done correctly 6. **Scope Boundaries** β€” What is explicitly out of scope ### Template ``` ## Objective Build the user authentication API endpoints. ## Owned Files - src/api/auth.ts - src/api/middleware/auth-middleware.ts - src/types/auth.ts (shared β€” read only, do not modify) ## Requirements - POST /api/login β€” accepts email/password, returns JWT - POST /api/register β€” creates new user, returns JWT - GET /api/me β€” returns current user profile (requires auth) ## Interface Contract - Import User type from src/types/auth.ts (owned by implementer-1) - Export AuthResponse type for frontend consumption ## Acceptance Criteria - All endpoints return proper HTTP status codes - JWT tokens expire after 24 hours - Passwords are hashed with bcrypt ## Out of Scope - OAuth/social login - Password reset flow - Rate limiting ``` ## Workload Monitoring ### Indicators of Imbalance | Signal | Meaning | Action | | -------------------------- | ------------------- | --------------------------- | | Teammate idle, others busy | Uneven distribution | Reassign pending tasks | | Teammate stuck on one task | Possible blocker | Check in, offer help | | All tasks blocked | Dependency issue | Resolve critical path first | | One teammate has 3x others | Overloaded | Split tasks or reassign | ### Rebalancing Steps 1. Call `TaskList` to assess current state 2. Identify idle or overloaded teammates 3. Use `TaskUpdate` to reassign tasks 4. Use `SendMessage` to notify affected teammates 5. Monitor for improved throughput
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

workflow-orchestration-patterns

Design durable workflows with Temporal for distributed systems.

coding
⭐1
# Workflow Orchestration Patterns Master workflow orchestration architecture with Temporal, covering fundamental design decisions, resilience patterns, and best practices for building reliable distributed systems. ## When to Use Workflow Orchestration ### Ideal Use Cases (Source: docs.temporal.io) - **Multi-step processes** spanning machines/services/databases - **Distributed transactions** requiring all-or-nothing semantics - **Long-running workflows** (hours to years) with automatic state persistence - **Failure recovery** that must resume from last successful step - **Business processes**: bookings, orders, campaigns, approvals - **Entity lifecycle management**: inventory tracking, account management, cart workflows - **Infrastructure automation**: CI/CD pipelines, provisioning, deployments - **Human-in-the-loop** systems requiring timeouts and escalations ### When NOT to Use - Simple CRUD operations (use direct API calls) - Pure data processing pipelines (use Airflow, batch processing) - Stateless request/response (use standard APIs) - Real-time streaming (use Kafka, event processors) ## Critical Design Decision: Workflows vs Activities **The Fundamental Rule** (Source: temporal.io/blog/workflow-engine-principles): - **Workflows** = Orchestration logic and decision-making - **Activities** = External interactions (APIs, databases, network calls) ### Workflows (Orchestration) **Characteristics:** - Contain business logic and coordination - **MUST be deterministic** (same inputs β†’ same outputs) - **Cannot** perform direct external calls - State automatically preserved across failures - Can run for years despite infrastructure failures **Example workflow tasks:** - Decide which steps to execute - Handle compensation logic - Manage timeouts and retries - Coordinate child workflows ### Activities (External Interactions) **Characteristics:** - Handle all external system interactions - Can be non-deterministic (API calls, DB writes) - Include built-in timeouts and retry logic - **Must be idempotent** (calling N times = calling once) - Short-lived (seconds to minutes typically) **Example activity tasks:** - Call payment gateway API - Write to database - Send emails or notifications - Query external services ### Design Decision Framework ``` Does it touch external systems? β†’ Activity Is it orchestration/decision logic? β†’ Workflow ``` ## Core Workflow Patterns ### 1. Saga Pattern with Compensation **Purpose**: Implement distributed transactions with rollback capability **Pattern** (Source: temporal.io/blog/compensating-actions-part-of-a-complete-breakfast-with-sagas): ``` For each step: 1. Register compensation BEFORE executing 2. Execute the step (via activity) 3. On failure, run all compensations in reverse order (LIFO) ``` **Example: Payment Workflow** 1. Reserve inventory (compensation: release inventory) 2. Charge payment (compensation: refund payment) 3. Fulfill order (compensation: cancel fulfillment) **Critical Requirements:** - Compensations must be idempotent - Register compensation BEFORE executing step - Run compensations in reverse order - Handle partial failures gracefully ### 2. Entity Workflows (Actor Model) **Purpose**: Long-lived workflow representing single entity instance **Pattern** (Source: docs.temporal.io/evaluate/use-cases-design-patterns): - One workflow execution = one entity (cart, account, inventory item) - Workflow persists for entity lifetime - Receives signals for state changes - Supports queries for current state **Example Use Cases:** - Shopping cart (add items, checkout, expiration) - Bank account (deposits, withdrawals, balance checks) - Product inventory (stock updates, reservations) **Benefits:** - Encapsulates entity behavior - Guarantees consistency per entity - Natural event sourcing ### 3. Fan-Out/Fan-In (Parallel Execution) **Purpose**: Execute multiple tasks in parallel, aggregate results **Pattern:** - Spawn child workflows or parallel activities - Wait for all to complete - Aggregate results - Handle partial failures **Scaling Rule** (Source: temporal.io/blog/workflow-engine-principles): - Don't scale individual workflows - For 1M tasks: spawn 1K child workflows Γ— 1K tasks each - Keep each workflow bounded ### 4. Async Callback Pattern **Purpose**: Wait for external event or human approval **Pattern:** - Workflow sends request and waits for signal - External system processes asynchronously - Sends signal to resume workflow - Workflow continues with response **Use Cases:** - Human approval workflows - Webhook callbacks - Long-running external processes ## State Management and Determinism ### Automatic State Preservation **How Temporal Works** (Source: docs.temporal.io/workflows): - Complete program state preserved automatically - Event History records every command and event - Seamless recovery from crashes - Applications restore pre-failure state ### Determinism Constraints **Workflows Execute as State Machines**: - Replay behavior must be consistent - Same inputs β†’ identical outputs every time **Prohibited in Workflows** (Source: docs.temporal.io/workflows): - ❌ Threading, locks, synchronization primitives - ❌ Random number generation (`random()`) - ❌ Global state or static variables - ❌ System time (`datetime.now()`) - ❌ Direct file I/O or network calls - ❌ Non-deterministic libraries **Allowed in Workflows**: - βœ… `workflow.now()` (deterministic time) - βœ… `workflow.random()` (deterministic random) - βœ… Pure functions and calculations - βœ… Calling activities (non-deterministic operations) ### Versioning Strategies **Challenge**: Changing workflow code while old executions still running **Solutions**: 1. **Versioning API**: Use `workflow.get_version()` for safe changes 2. **New Workflow Type**: Create new workflow, route new executions to it 3. **Backward Compatibility**: Ensure old events replay correctly ## Resilience and Error Handling ### Retry Policies **Default Behavior**: Temporal retries activities forever **Configure Retry**: - Initial retry interval - Backoff coefficient (exponential backoff) - Maximum interval (cap retry delay) - Maximum attempts (eventually fail) **Non-Retryable Errors**: - Invalid input (validation failures) - Business rule violations - Permanent failures (resource not found) ### Idempotency Requirements **Why Critical** (Source: docs.temporal.io/activities): - Activities may execute multiple times - Network failures trigger retries - Duplicate execution must be safe **Implementation Strategies**: - Idempotency keys (deduplication) - Check-then-act with unique constraints - Upsert operations instead of insert - Track processed request IDs ### Activity Heartbeats **Purpose**: Detect stalled long-running activities **Pattern**: - Activity sends periodic heartbeat - Includes progress information - Timeout if no heartbeat received - Enables progress-based retry ## Best Practices ### Workflow Design 1. **Keep workflows focused** - Single responsibility per workflow 2. **Small workflows** - Use child workflows for scalability 3. **Clear boundaries** - Workflow orchestrates, activities execute 4. **Test locally** - Use time-skipping test environment ### Activity Design 1. **Idempotent operations** - Safe to retry 2. **Short-lived** - Seconds to minutes, not hours 3. **Timeout configuration** - Always set timeouts 4. **Heartbeat for long tasks** - Report progress 5. **Error handling** - Distinguish retryable vs non-retryable ### Common Pitfalls **Workflow Violations**: - Using `datetime.now()` instead of `workflow.now()` - Threading or async operations in workflow code - Calling external APIs directly from workflow - Non-deterministic logic in workflows **Activity Mistakes**: - Non-idempotent operations (can't handle retries) - Missing timeouts (activities run forever) - No error classification (retry validation errors) - Ignoring payload limits (2MB per argument) ### Operational Considerations **Monitoring**: - Workflow execution duration - Activity failure rates - Retry attempts and backoff - Pending workflow counts **Scalability**: - Horizontal scaling with workers - Task queue partitioning - Child workflow decomposition - Activity batching when appropriate ## Additional Resources **Official Documentation**: - Temporal Core Concepts: docs.temporal.io/workflows - Workflow Patterns: docs.temporal.io/evaluate/use-cases-design-patterns - Best Practices: docs.temporal.io/develop/best-practices - Saga Pattern: temporal.io/blog/saga-pattern-made-easy **Key Principles**: 1. Workflows = orchestration, Activities = external calls 2. Determinism is non-negotiable for workflows 3. Idempotency is critical for activities 4. State preservation is automatic 5. Design for failure and recovery
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

linkerd-patterns

Implement Linkerd service mesh patterns for lightweight,

architecture
⭐1
# Linkerd Patterns Production patterns for Linkerd service mesh - the lightweight, security-first service mesh for Kubernetes. ## When to Use This Skill - Setting up a lightweight service mesh - Implementing automatic mTLS - Configuring traffic splits for canary deployments - Setting up service profiles for per-route metrics - Implementing retries and timeouts - Multi-cluster service mesh ## Core Concepts ### 1. Linkerd Architecture ``` β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ Control Plane β”‚ β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ destiny β”‚ β”‚ identity β”‚ β”‚ proxy-inject β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ Data Plane β”‚ β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ β”‚ β”‚proxy│────│proxy│────│proxyβ”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β” β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ app β”‚ β”‚ app β”‚ β”‚ app β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ ``` ### 2. Key Resources | Resource | Purpose | | ----------------------- | ------------------------------------ | | **ServiceProfile** | Per-route metrics, retries, timeouts | | **TrafficSplit** | Canary deployments, A/B testing | | **Server** | Define server-side policies | | **ServerAuthorization** | Access control policies | ## Templates ### Template 1: Mesh Installation ```bash # Install CLI curl --proto '=https' --tlsv1.2 -sSfL https://run.linkerd.io/install | sh # Validate cluster linkerd check --pre # Install CRDs linkerd install --crds | kubectl apply -f - # Install control plane linkerd install | kubectl apply -f - # Verify installation linkerd check # Install viz extension (optional) linkerd viz install | kubectl apply -f - ``` ### Template 2: Inject Namespace ```yaml # Automatic injection for namespace apiVersion: v1 kind: Namespace metadata: name: my-app annotations: linkerd.io/inject: enabled --- # Or inject specific deployment apiVersion: apps/v1 kind: Deployment metadata: name: my-app annotations: linkerd.io/inject: enabled spec: template: metadata: annotations: linkerd.io/inject: enabled ``` ### Template 3: Service Profile with Retries ```yaml apiVersion: linkerd.io/v1alpha2 kind: ServiceProfile metadata: name: my-service.my-namespace.svc.cluster.local namespace: my-namespace spec: routes: - name: GET /api/users condition: method: GET pathRegex: /api/users responseClasses: - condition: status: min: 500 max: 599 isFailure: true isRetryable: true - name: POST /api/users condition: method: POST pathRegex: /api/users # POST not retryable by default isRetryable: false - name: GET /api/users/{id} condition: method: GET pathRegex: /api/users/[^/]+ timeout: 5s isRetryable: true retryBudget: retryRatio: 0.2 minRetriesPerSecond: 10 ttl: 10s ``` ### Template 4: Traffic Split (Canary) ```yaml apiVersion: split.smi-spec.io/v1alpha1 kind: TrafficSplit metadata: name: my-service-canary namespace: my-namespace spec: service: my-service backends: - service: my-service-stable weight: 900m # 90% - service: my-service-canary weight: 100m # 10% ``` ### Template 5: Server Authorization Policy ```yaml # Define the server apiVersion: policy.linkerd.io/v1beta1 kind: Server metadata: name: my-service-http namespace: my-namespace spec: podSelector: matchLabels: app: my-service port: http proxyProtocol: HTTP/1 --- # Allow traffic from specific clients apiVersion: policy.linkerd.io/v1beta1 kind: ServerAuthorization metadata: name: allow-frontend namespace: my-namespace spec: server: name: my-service-http client: meshTLS: serviceAccounts: - name: frontend namespace: my-namespace --- # Allow unauthenticated traffic (e.g., from ingress) apiVersion: policy.linkerd.io/v1beta1 kind: ServerAuthorization metadata: name: allow-ingress namespace: my-namespace spec: server: name: my-service-http client: unauthenticated: true networks: - cidr: 10.0.0.0/8 ``` ### Template 6: HTTPRoute for Advanced Routing ```yaml apiVersion: policy.linkerd.io/v1beta2 kind: HTTPRoute metadata: name: my-route namespace: my-namespace spec: parentRefs: - name: my-service kind: Service group: core port: 8080 rules: - matches: - path: type: PathPrefix value: /api/v2 - headers: - name: x-api-version value: v2 backendRefs: - name: my-service-v2 port: 8080 - matches: - path: type: PathPrefix value: /api backendRefs: - name: my-service-v1 port: 8080 ``` ### Template 7: Multi-cluster Setup ```bash # On each cluster, install with cluster credentials linkerd multicluster install | kubectl apply -f - # Link clusters linkerd multicluster link --cluster-name west \ --api-server-address https://west.example.com:6443 \ | kubectl apply -f - # Export a service to other clusters kubectl label svc/my-service mirror.linkerd.io/exported=true # Verify cross-cluster connectivity linkerd multicluster check linkerd multicluster gateways ``` ## Monitoring Commands ```bash # Live traffic view linkerd viz top deploy/my-app # Per-route metrics linkerd viz routes deploy/my-app # Check proxy status linkerd viz stat deploy -n my-namespace # View service dependencies linkerd viz edges deploy -n my-namespace # Dashboard linkerd viz dashboard ``` ## Debugging ```bash # Check injection status linkerd check --proxy -n my-namespace # View proxy logs kubectl logs deploy/my-app -c linkerd-proxy # Debug identity/TLS linkerd identity -n my-namespace # Tap traffic (live) linkerd viz tap deploy/my-app --to deploy/my-backend ``` ## Best Practices ### Do's - **Enable mTLS everywhere** - It's automatic with Linkerd - **Use ServiceProfiles** - Get per-route metrics and retries - **Set retry budgets** - Prevent retry storms - **Monitor golden metrics** - Success rate, latency, throughput ### Don'ts - **Don't skip check** - Always run `linkerd check` after changes - **Don't over-configure** - Linkerd defaults are sensible - **Don't ignore ServiceProfiles** - They unlock advanced features - **Don't forget timeouts** - Set appropriate values per route ## Resources - [Linkerd Documentation](https://linkerd.io/2.14/overview/) - [Service Profiles](https://linkerd.io/2.14/features/service-profiles/) - [Authorization Policy](https://linkerd.io/2.14/features/server-policy/)
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

temporal-python-testing

Test Temporal workflows with pytest, time-skipping, and mocking

coding
⭐1
# Temporal Python Testing Strategies Comprehensive testing approaches for Temporal workflows using pytest, progressive disclosure resources for specific testing scenarios. ## When to Use This Skill - **Unit testing workflows** - Fast tests with time-skipping - **Integration testing** - Workflows with mocked activities - **Replay testing** - Validate determinism against production histories - **Local development** - Set up Temporal server and pytest - **CI/CD integration** - Automated testing pipelines - **Coverage strategies** - Achieve β‰₯80% test coverage ## Testing Philosophy **Recommended Approach** (Source: docs.temporal.io/develop/python/testing-suite): - Write majority as integration tests - Use pytest with async fixtures - Time-skipping enables fast feedback (month-long workflows β†’ seconds) - Mock activities to isolate workflow logic - Validate determinism with replay testing **Three Test Types**: 1. **Unit**: Workflows with time-skipping, activities with ActivityEnvironment 2. **Integration**: Workers with mocked activities 3. **End-to-end**: Full Temporal server with real activities (use sparingly) ## Available Resources This skill provides detailed guidance through progressive disclosure. Load specific resources based on your testing needs: ### Unit Testing Resources **File**: `resources/unit-testing.md` **When to load**: Testing individual workflows or activities in isolation **Contains**: - WorkflowEnvironment with time-skipping - ActivityEnvironment for activity testing - Fast execution of long-running workflows - Manual time advancement patterns - pytest fixtures and patterns ### Integration Testing Resources **File**: `resources/integration-testing.md` **When to load**: Testing workflows with mocked external dependencies **Contains**: - Activity mocking strategies - Error injection patterns - Multi-activity workflow testing - Signal and query testing - Coverage strategies ### Replay Testing Resources **File**: `resources/replay-testing.md` **When to load**: Validating determinism or deploying workflow changes **Contains**: - Determinism validation - Production history replay - CI/CD integration patterns - Version compatibility testing ### Local Development Resources **File**: `resources/local-setup.md` **When to load**: Setting up development environment **Contains**: - Docker Compose configuration - pytest setup and configuration - Coverage tool integration - Development workflow ## Quick Start Guide ### Basic Workflow Test ```python import pytest from temporalio.testing import WorkflowEnvironment from temporalio.worker import Worker @pytest.fixture async def workflow_env(): env = await WorkflowEnvironment.start_time_skipping() yield env await env.shutdown() @pytest.mark.asyncio async def test_workflow(workflow_env): async with Worker( workflow_env.client, task_queue="test-queue", workflows=[YourWorkflow], activities=[your_activity], ): result = await workflow_env.client.execute_workflow( YourWorkflow.run, args, id="test-wf-id", task_queue="test-queue", ) assert result == expected ``` ### Basic Activity Test ```python from temporalio.testing import ActivityEnvironment async def test_activity(): env = ActivityEnvironment() result = await env.run(your_activity, "test-input") assert result == expected_output ``` ## Coverage Targets **Recommended Coverage** (Source: docs.temporal.io best practices): - **Workflows**: β‰₯80% logic coverage - **Activities**: β‰₯80% logic coverage - **Integration**: Critical paths with mocked activities - **Replay**: All workflow versions before deployment ## Key Testing Principles 1. **Time-Skipping** - Month-long workflows test in seconds 2. **Mock Activities** - Isolate workflow logic from external dependencies 3. **Replay Testing** - Validate determinism before deployment 4. **High Coverage** - β‰₯80% target for production workflows 5. **Fast Feedback** - Unit tests run in milliseconds ## How to Use Resources **Load specific resource when needed**: - "Show me unit testing patterns" β†’ Load `resources/unit-testing.md` - "How do I mock activities?" β†’ Load `resources/integration-testing.md` - "Setup local Temporal server" β†’ Load `resources/local-setup.md` - "Validate determinism" β†’ Load `resources/replay-testing.md` ## Additional References - Python SDK Testing: docs.temporal.io/develop/python/testing-suite - Testing Patterns: github.com/temporalio/temporal/blob/main/docs/development/testing.md - Python Samples: github.com/temporalio/samples-python
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

fastapi-templates

Create production-ready FastAPI projects with async patterns,

coding
⭐1
# FastAPI Project Templates Production-ready FastAPI project structures with async patterns, dependency injection, middleware, and best practices for building high-performance APIs. ## When to Use This Skill - Starting new FastAPI projects from scratch - Implementing async REST APIs with Python - Building high-performance web services and microservices - Creating async applications with PostgreSQL, MongoDB - Setting up API projects with proper structure and testing ## Core Concepts ### 1. Project Structure **Recommended Layout:** ``` app/ β”œβ”€β”€ api/ # API routes β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ v1/ β”‚ β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ endpoints/ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ users.py β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ auth.py β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ └── items.py β”‚ β”‚ └── router.py β”‚ └── dependencies.py # Shared dependencies β”œβ”€β”€ core/ # Core configuration β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ config.py β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ security.py β”‚ └── database.py β”œβ”€β”€ models/ # Database models β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ user.py β”‚ └── item.py β”œβ”€β”€ schemas/ # Pydantic schemas β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ user.py β”‚ └── item.py β”œβ”€β”€ services/ # Business logic β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ user_service.py β”‚ └── auth_service.py β”œβ”€β”€ repositories/ # Data access β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ user_repository.py β”‚ └── item_repository.py └── main.py # Application entry ``` ### 2. Dependency Injection FastAPI's built-in DI system using `Depends`: - Database session management - Authentication/authorization - Shared business logic - Configuration injection ### 3. Async Patterns Proper async/await usage: - Async route handlers - Async database operations - Async background tasks - Async middleware ## Implementation Patterns ### Pattern 1: Complete FastAPI Application ```python # main.py from fastapi import FastAPI, Depends from fastapi.middleware.cors import CORSMiddleware from contextlib import asynccontextmanager @asynccontextmanager async def lifespan(app: FastAPI): """Application lifespan events.""" # Startup await database.connect() yield # Shutdown await database.disconnect() app = FastAPI( title="API Template", version="1.0.0", lifespan=lifespan ) # CORS middleware app.add_middleware( CORSMiddleware, allow_origins=["*"], allow_credentials=True, allow_methods=["*"], allow_headers=["*"], ) # Include routers from app.api.v1.router import api_router app.include_router(api_router, prefix="/api/v1") # core/config.py from pydantic_settings import BaseSettings from functools import lru_cache class Settings(BaseSettings): """Application settings.""" DATABASE_URL: str SECRET_KEY: str ACCESS_TOKEN_EXPIRE_MINUTES: int = 30 API_V1_STR: str = "/api/v1" class Config: env_file = ".env" @lru_cache() def get_settings() -> Settings: return Settings() # core/database.py from sqlalchemy.ext.asyncio import create_async_engine, AsyncSession from sqlalchemy.ext.declarative import declarative_base from sqlalchemy.orm import sessionmaker from app.core.config import get_settings settings = get_settings() engine = create_async_engine( settings.DATABASE_URL, echo=True, future=True ) AsyncSessionLocal = sessionmaker( engine, class_=AsyncSession, expire_on_commit=False ) Base = declarative_base() async def get_db() -> AsyncSession: """Dependency for database session.""" async with AsyncSessionLocal() as session: try: yield session await session.commit() except Exception: await session.rollback() raise finally: await session.close() ``` ### Pattern 2: CRUD Repository Pattern ```python # repositories/base_repository.py from typing import Generic, TypeVar, Type, Optional, List from sqlalchemy.ext.asyncio import AsyncSession from sqlalchemy import select from pydantic import BaseModel ModelType = TypeVar("ModelType") CreateSchemaType = TypeVar("CreateSchemaType", bound=BaseModel) UpdateSchemaType = TypeVar("UpdateSchemaType", bound=BaseModel) class BaseRepository(Generic[ModelType, CreateSchemaType, UpdateSchemaType]): """Base repository for CRUD operations.""" def __init__(self, model: Type[ModelType]): self.model = model async def get(self, db: AsyncSession, id: int) -> Optional[ModelType]: """Get by ID.""" result = await db.execute( select(self.model).where(self.model.id == id) ) return result.scalars().first() async def get_multi( self, db: AsyncSession, skip: int = 0, limit: int = 100 ) -> List[ModelType]: """Get multiple records.""" result = await db.execute( select(self.model).offset(skip).limit(limit) ) return result.scalars().all() async def create( self, db: AsyncSession, obj_in: CreateSchemaType ) -> ModelType: """Create new record.""" db_obj = self.model(**obj_in.dict()) db.add(db_obj) await db.flush() await db.refresh(db_obj) return db_obj async def update( self, db: AsyncSession, db_obj: ModelType, obj_in: UpdateSchemaType ) -> ModelType: """Update record.""" update_data = obj_in.dict(exclude_unset=True) for field, value in update_data.items(): setattr(db_obj, field, value) await db.flush() await db.refresh(db_obj) return db_obj async def delete(self, db: AsyncSession, id: int) -> bool: """Delete record.""" obj = await self.get(db, id) if obj: await db.delete(obj) return True return False # repositories/user_repository.py from app.repositories.base_repository import BaseRepository from app.models.user import User from app.schemas.user import UserCreate, UserUpdate class UserRepository(BaseRepository[User, UserCreate, UserUpdate]): """User-specific repository.""" async def get_by_email(self, db: AsyncSession, email: str) -> Optional[User]: """Get user by email.""" result = await db.execute( select(User).where(User.email == email) ) return result.scalars().first() async def is_active(self, db: AsyncSession, user_id: int) -> bool: """Check if user is active.""" user = await self.get(db, user_id) return user.is_active if user else False user_repository = UserRepository(User) ``` ### Pattern 3: Service Layer ```python # services/user_service.py from typing import Optional from sqlalchemy.ext.asyncio import AsyncSession from app.repositories.user_repository import user_repository from app.schemas.user import UserCreate, UserUpdate, User from app.core.security import get_password_hash, verify_password class UserService: """Business logic for users.""" def __init__(self): self.repository = user_repository async def create_user( self, db: AsyncSession, user_in: UserCreate ) -> User: """Create new user with hashed password.""" # Check if email exists existing = await self.repository.get_by_email(db, user_in.email) if existing: raise ValueError("Email already registered") # Hash password user_in_dict = user_in.dict() user_in_dict["hashed_password"] = get_password_hash(user_in_dict.pop("password")) # Create user user = await self.repository.create(db, UserCreate(**user_in_dict)) return user async def authenticate( self, db: AsyncSession, email: str, password: str ) -> Optional[User]: """Authenticate user.""" user = await self.repository.get_by_email(db, email) if not user: return None if not verify_password(password, user.hashed_password): return None return user async def update_user( self, db: AsyncSession, user_id: int, user_in: UserUpdate ) -> Optional[User]: """Update user.""" user = await self.repository.get(db, user_id) if not user: return None if user_in.password: user_in_dict = user_in.dict(exclude_unset=True) user_in_dict["hashed_password"] = get_password_hash( user_in_dict.pop("password") ) user_in = UserUpdate(**user_in_dict) return await self.repository.update(db, user, user_in) user_service = UserService() ``` ### Pattern 4: API Endpoints with Dependencies ```python # api/v1/endpoints/users.py from fastapi import APIRouter, Depends, HTTPException, status from sqlalchemy.ext.asyncio import AsyncSession from typing import List from app.core.database import get_db from app.schemas.user import User, UserCreate, UserUpdate from app.services.user_service import user_service from app.api.dependencies import get_current_user router = APIRouter() @router.post("/", response_model=User, status_code=status.HTTP_201_CREATED) async def create_user( user_in: UserCreate, db: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db) ): """Create new user.""" try: user = await user_service.create_user(db, user_in) return user except ValueError as e: raise HTTPException(status_code=400, detail=str(e)) @router.get("/me", response_model=User) async def read_current_user( current_user: User = Depends(get_current_user) ): """Get current user.""" return current_user @router.get("/{user_id}", response_model=User) async def read_user( user_id: int, db: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db), current_user: User = Depends(get_current_user) ): """Get user by ID.""" user = await user_service.repository.get(db, user_id) if not user: raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="User not found") return user @router.patch("/{user_id}", response_model=User) async def update_user( user_id: int, user_in: UserUpdate, db: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db), current_user: User = Depends(get_current_user) ): """Update user.""" if current_user.id != user_id: raise HTTPException(status_code=403, detail="Not authorized") user = await user_service.update_user(db, user_id, user_in) if not user: raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="User not found") return user @router.delete("/{user_id}", status_code=status.HTTP_204_NO_CONTENT) async def delete_user( user_id: int, db: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db), current_user: User = Depends(get_current_user) ): """Delete user.""" if current_user.id != user_id: raise HTTPException(status_code=403, detail="Not authorized") deleted = await user_service.repository.delete(db, user_id) if not deleted: raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="User not found") ``` ### Pattern 5: Authentication & Authorization ```python # core/security.py from datetime import datetime, timedelta from typing import Optional from jose import JWTError, jwt from passlib.context import CryptContext from app.core.config import get_settings settings = get_settings() pwd_context = CryptContext(schemes=["bcrypt"], deprecated="auto") ALGORITHM = "HS256" def create_access_token(data: dict, expires_delta: Optional[timedelta] = None): """Create JWT access token.""" to_encode = data.copy() if expires_delta: expire = datetime.utcnow() + expires_delta else: expire = datetime.utcnow() + timedelta(minutes=15) to_encode.update({"exp": expire}) encoded_jwt = jwt.encode(to_encode, settings.SECRET_KEY, algorithm=ALGORITHM) return encoded_jwt def verify_password(plain_password: str, hashed_password: str) -> bool: """Verify password against hash.""" return pwd_context.verify(plain_password, hashed_password) def get_password_hash(password: str) -> str: """Hash password.""" return pwd_context.hash(password) # api/dependencies.py from fastapi import Depends, HTTPException, status from fastapi.security import OAuth2PasswordBearer from jose import JWTError, jwt from sqlalchemy.ext.asyncio import AsyncSession from app.core.database import get_db from app.core.security import ALGORITHM from app.core.config import get_settings from app.repositories.user_repository import user_repository oauth2_scheme = OAuth2PasswordBearer(tokenUrl=f"{settings.API_V1_STR}/auth/login") async def get_current_user( db: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db), token: str = Depends(oauth2_scheme) ): """Get current authenticated user.""" credentials_exception = HTTPException( status_code=status.HTTP_401_UNAUTHORIZED, detail="Could not validate credentials", headers={"WWW-Authenticate": "Bearer"}, ) try: payload = jwt.decode(token, settings.SECRET_KEY, algorithms=[ALGORITHM]) user_id: int = payload.get("sub") if user_id is None: raise credentials_exception except JWTError: raise credentials_exception user = await user_repository.get(db, user_id) if user is None: raise credentials_exception return user ``` ## Testing ```python # tests/conftest.py import pytest import asyncio from httpx import AsyncClient from sqlalchemy.ext.asyncio import create_async_engine, AsyncSession from sqlalchemy.orm import sessionmaker from app.main import app from app.core.database import get_db, Base TEST_DATABASE_URL = "sqlite+aiosqlite:///:memory:" @pytest.fixture(scope="session") def event_loop(): loop = asyncio.get_event_loop_policy().new_event_loop() yield loop loop.close() @pytest.fixture async def db_session(): engine = create_async_engine(TEST_DATABASE_URL, echo=True) async with engine.begin() as conn: await conn.run_sync(Base.metadata.create_all) AsyncSessionLocal = sessionmaker( engine, class_=AsyncSession, expire_on_commit=False ) async with AsyncSessionLocal() as session: yield session @pytest.fixture async def client(db_session): async def override_get_db(): yield db_session app.dependency_overrides[get_db] = override_get_db async with AsyncClient(app=app, base_url="http://test") as client: yield client # tests/test_users.py import pytest @pytest.mark.asyncio async def test_create_user(client): response = await client.post( "/api/v1/users/", json={ "email": "test@example.com", "password": "testpass123", "name": "Test User" } ) assert response.status_code == 201 data = response.json() assert data["email"] == "test@example.com" assert "id" in data ``` ## Resources - **references/fastapi-architecture.md**: Detailed architecture guide - **references/async-best-practices.md**: Async/await patterns - **references/testing-strategies.md**: Comprehensive testing guide - **assets/project-template/**: Complete FastAPI project - **assets/docker-compose.yml**: Development environment setup ## Best Practices 1. **Async All The Way**: Use async for database, external APIs 2. **Dependency Injection**: Leverage FastAPI's DI system 3. **Repository Pattern**: Separate data access from business logic 4. **Service Layer**: Keep business logic out of routes 5. **Pydantic Schemas**: Strong typing for request/response 6. **Error Handling**: Consistent error responses 7. **Testing**: Test all layers independently ## Common Pitfalls - **Blocking Code in Async**: Using synchronous database drivers - **No Service Layer**: Business logic in route handlers - **Missing Type Hints**: Loses FastAPI's benefits - **Ignoring Sessions**: Not properly managing database sessions - **No Testing**: Skipping integration tests - **Tight Coupling**: Direct database access in routes
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

hybrid-cloud-networking

Configure secure, high-performance connectivity between on-premises

architecture
⭐1
# Hybrid Cloud Networking Configure secure, high-performance connectivity between on-premises and cloud environments using VPN, Direct Connect, and ExpressRoute. ## Purpose Establish secure, reliable network connectivity between on-premises data centers and cloud providers (AWS, Azure, GCP). ## When to Use - Connect on-premises to cloud - Extend datacenter to cloud - Implement hybrid active-active setups - Meet compliance requirements - Migrate to cloud gradually ## Connection Options ### AWS Connectivity #### 1. Site-to-Site VPN - IPSec VPN over internet - Up to 1.25 Gbps per tunnel - Cost-effective for moderate bandwidth - Higher latency, internet-dependent ```hcl resource "aws_vpn_gateway" "main" { vpc_id = aws_vpc.main.id tags = { Name = "main-vpn-gateway" } } resource "aws_customer_gateway" "main" { bgp_asn = 65000 ip_address = "203.0.113.1" type = "ipsec.1" } resource "aws_vpn_connection" "main" { vpn_gateway_id = aws_vpn_gateway.main.id customer_gateway_id = aws_customer_gateway.main.id type = "ipsec.1" static_routes_only = false } ``` #### 2. AWS Direct Connect - Dedicated network connection - 1 Gbps to 100 Gbps - Lower latency, consistent bandwidth - More expensive, setup time required **Reference:** See `references/direct-connect.md` ### Azure Connectivity #### 1. Site-to-Site VPN ```hcl resource "azurerm_virtual_network_gateway" "vpn" { name = "vpn-gateway" location = azurerm_resource_group.main.location resource_group_name = azurerm_resource_group.main.name type = "Vpn" vpn_type = "RouteBased" sku = "VpnGw1" ip_configuration { name = "vnetGatewayConfig" public_ip_address_id = azurerm_public_ip.vpn.id private_ip_address_allocation = "Dynamic" subnet_id = azurerm_subnet.gateway.id } } ``` #### 2. Azure ExpressRoute - Private connection via connectivity provider - Up to 100 Gbps - Low latency, high reliability - Premium for global connectivity ### GCP Connectivity #### 1. Cloud VPN - IPSec VPN (Classic or HA VPN) - HA VPN: 99.99% SLA - Up to 3 Gbps per tunnel #### 2. Cloud Interconnect - Dedicated (10 Gbps, 100 Gbps) - Partner (50 Mbps to 50 Gbps) - Lower latency than VPN ## Hybrid Network Patterns ### Pattern 1: Hub-and-Spoke ``` On-Premises Datacenter ↓ VPN/Direct Connect ↓ Transit Gateway (AWS) / vWAN (Azure) ↓ β”œβ”€ Production VPC/VNet β”œβ”€ Staging VPC/VNet └─ Development VPC/VNet ``` ### Pattern 2: Multi-Region Hybrid ``` On-Premises β”œβ”€ Direct Connect β†’ us-east-1 └─ Direct Connect β†’ us-west-2 ↓ Cross-Region Peering ``` ### Pattern 3: Multi-Cloud Hybrid ``` On-Premises Datacenter β”œβ”€ Direct Connect β†’ AWS β”œβ”€ ExpressRoute β†’ Azure └─ Interconnect β†’ GCP ``` ## Routing Configuration ### BGP Configuration ``` On-Premises Router: - AS Number: 65000 - Advertise: 10.0.0.0/8 Cloud Router: - AS Number: 64512 (AWS), 65515 (Azure) - Advertise: Cloud VPC/VNet CIDRs ``` ### Route Propagation - Enable route propagation on route tables - Use BGP for dynamic routing - Implement route filtering - Monitor route advertisements ## Security Best Practices 1. **Use private connectivity** (Direct Connect/ExpressRoute) 2. **Implement encryption** for VPN tunnels 3. **Use VPC endpoints** to avoid internet routing 4. **Configure network ACLs** and security groups 5. **Enable VPC Flow Logs** for monitoring 6. **Implement DDoS protection** 7. **Use PrivateLink/Private Endpoints** 8. **Monitor connections** with CloudWatch/Monitor 9. **Implement redundancy** (dual tunnels) 10. **Regular security audits** ## High Availability ### Dual VPN Tunnels ```hcl resource "aws_vpn_connection" "primary" { vpn_gateway_id = aws_vpn_gateway.main.id customer_gateway_id = aws_customer_gateway.primary.id type = "ipsec.1" } resource "aws_vpn_connection" "secondary" { vpn_gateway_id = aws_vpn_gateway.main.id customer_gateway_id = aws_customer_gateway.secondary.id type = "ipsec.1" } ``` ### Active-Active Configuration - Multiple connections from different locations - BGP for automatic failover - Equal-cost multi-path (ECMP) routing - Monitor health of all connections ## Monitoring and Troubleshooting ### Key Metrics - Tunnel status (up/down) - Bytes in/out - Packet loss - Latency - BGP session status ### Troubleshooting ```bash # AWS VPN aws ec2 describe-vpn-connections aws ec2 get-vpn-connection-telemetry # Azure VPN az network vpn-connection show az network vpn-connection show-device-config-script ``` ## Cost Optimization 1. **Right-size connections** based on traffic 2. **Use VPN for low-bandwidth** workloads 3. **Consolidate traffic** through fewer connections 4. **Minimize data transfer** costs 5. **Use Direct Connect** for high bandwidth 6. **Implement caching** to reduce traffic ## Reference Files - `references/vpn-setup.md` - VPN configuration guide - `references/direct-connect.md` - Direct Connect setup ## Related Skills - `multi-cloud-architecture` - For architecture decisions - `terraform-module-library` - For IaC implementation
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered