Skip to main content
EVOKORE// BROWSE
>

./browse/prompts

3 NODES
🤖system prompt•6 months ago

Human-in-the-Loop Approval Token Workflow

Gate risky tool execution behind approval tokens so agents can retry safely after a human reviewer signs off.

security
⭐1
# Human-in-the-Loop Approval Token Workflow Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this workflow when autonomous execution needs a durable handoff from human review back into the agent loop. ## Use this when - Retrying a blocked tool call after approval - Adding a human checkpoint to sensitive actions - Reducing insecure workarounds around approval flows ## Expected outcomes - Approval becomes a reusable tokenized workflow - Agents resume work without losing execution context - Security controls stay explicit instead of being implied ## Source synthesis - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/V2_MULTI_AGENT_WORKFLOWS.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/V2_MULTI_AGENT_WORKFLOWS.md) - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/AGENT33_IMPROVEMENT_INSTRUCTIONS.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/AGENT33_IMPROVEMENT_INSTRUCTIONS.md) ## Dedupe notes Synthesizes the approval-token concept from the main workflow doc and the Agent33 improvement transfer notes. ## Source excerpts ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/V2_MULTI_AGENT_WORKFLOWS.md With EVOKORE-MCP v2.0 fully operational, we can now leverage 40+ proxied GitHub and Filesystem tools seamlessly within complex multi-agent workflows. The core architectural advancements include: ## 1. Dynamic Tool Prefixing & Indexing Instead of loading 40+ tools into an LLM's context window statically (which causes massive bloat), EVOKORE's `ProxyManager` boots child servers (like `@modelcontextprotocol/server-github` and `@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem`) and dynamically prefixes their tools (`github_create_issue`, `fs_write_file`). This prevents namespace collisions while keeping the tools accessible to native skills. ## 2. Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) Security Interceptor Automated multi-agent workflows involving sensitive endpoints (like GitHub write access or file deletion) are governed by EVOKORE's stateless `_evokore_approval_token` architecture. - When an agent attempts a restricted action, the tool call is intercepted and blocked. - The server returns an error explicitly commanding the agent to prompt the human for approval. - Upon approval, the agent retries the exact tool call with the injected token, securely fulfilling the workflow without severing the conversational context. ## 3. Active Skill Orchestration (Native Harnessing) Unlike v1.0 where skills merel ... ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/AGENT33_IMPROVEMENT_INSTRUCTIONS.md > **Purpose**: Feed this file into Claude Code CLI when working on the Agent33 repo. It contains patterns, architectures, and capabilities proven in EVOKORE-MCP that Agent33 should adopt. --- ## 1. Multi-Server MCP Aggregation Pattern **What Agent33 lacks**: Agent33's MCP server (Phase 43) is a single-endpoint bridge. It doesn't aggregate multiple child MCP servers behind a unified namespace. **What to build**: A proxy layer that spawns and manages multiple child MCP servers from a single config file, presenting them as one unified tool surface. ### Implementation spec: ``` mcp.config.json { "servers": { "github": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-github"], "env": { "GITHUB_TOKEN": "${GITHUB_TOKEN}" } }, "fs": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem", "./"] }, "elevenlabs": { "command": "uvx", "args": ["elevenlabs-mcp"], "env": { "ELEVENLABS_API_KEY": "${ELEVENLABS_API_KEY}" } } } } ``` **Key patterns from EVOKORE**: - **Tool name prefixing**: Every proxied tool gets renamed `{serverId}_{originalName}` to prevent namespace collisions (e.g., `github_create_issue`, `fs_read_file`). First-registration-wins for duplicates. - **Environment interpolation**: `${VAR}` syntax in `env` blocks resolved ...
👍0
👁️0
docs
🤖system prompt•7 months ago

team-composition-patterns

Design optimal agent team compositions with sizing heuristics,

coding
⭐1
# Team Composition Patterns Best practices for composing multi-agent teams, selecting team sizes, choosing agent types, and configuring display modes for Claude Code's Agent Teams feature. ## When to Use This Skill - Deciding how many teammates to spawn for a task - Choosing between preset team configurations - Selecting the right agent type (subagent_type) for each role - Configuring teammate display modes (tmux, iTerm2, in-process) - Building custom team compositions for non-standard workflows ## Team Sizing Heuristics | Complexity | Team Size | When to Use | | ------------ | --------- | ----------------------------------------------------------- | | Simple | 1-2 | Single-dimension review, isolated bug, small feature | | Moderate | 2-3 | Multi-file changes, 2-3 concerns, medium features | | Complex | 3-4 | Cross-cutting concerns, large features, deep debugging | | Very Complex | 4-5 | Full-stack features, comprehensive reviews, systemic issues | **Rule of thumb**: Start with the smallest team that covers all required dimensions. Adding teammates increases coordination overhead. ## Preset Team Compositions ### Review Team - **Size**: 3 reviewers - **Agents**: 3x `team-reviewer` - **Default dimensions**: security, performance, architecture - **Use when**: Code changes need multi-dimensional quality assessment ### Debug Team - **Size**: 3 investigators - **Agents**: 3x `team-debugger` - **Default hypotheses**: 3 competing hypotheses - **Use when**: Bug has multiple plausible root causes ### Feature Team - **Size**: 3 (1 lead + 2 implementers) - **Agents**: 1x `team-lead` + 2x `team-implementer` - **Use when**: Feature can be decomposed into parallel work streams ### Fullstack Team - **Size**: 4 (1 lead + 3 implementers) - **Agents**: 1x `team-lead` + 1x frontend `team-implementer` + 1x backend `team-implementer` + 1x test `team-implementer` - **Use when**: Feature spans frontend, backend, and test layers ### Research Team - **Size**: 3 researchers - **Agents**: 3x `general-purpose` - **Default areas**: Each assigned a different research question, module, or topic - **Capabilities**: Codebase search (Grep, Glob, Read), web search (WebSearch, WebFetch) - **Use when**: Need to understand a codebase, research libraries, compare approaches, or gather information from code and web sources in parallel ### Security Team - **Size**: 4 reviewers - **Agents**: 4x `team-reviewer` - **Default dimensions**: OWASP/vulnerabilities, auth/access control, dependencies/supply chain, secrets/configuration - **Use when**: Comprehensive security audit covering multiple attack surfaces ### Migration Team - **Size**: 4 (1 lead + 2 implementers + 1 reviewer) - **Agents**: 1x `team-lead` + 2x `team-implementer` + 1x `team-reviewer` - **Use when**: Large codebase migration (framework upgrade, language port, API version bump) requiring parallel work with correctness verification ## Agent Type Selection When spawning teammates with the Task tool, choose `subagent_type` based on what tools the teammate needs: | Agent Type | Tools Available | Use For | | ------------------------------ | ----------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- | | `general-purpose` | All tools (Read, Write, Edit, Bash, etc.) | Implementation, debugging, any task requiring file changes | | `Explore` | Read-only tools (Read, Grep, Glob) | Research, code exploration, analysis | | `Plan` | Read-only tools | Architecture planning, task decomposition | | `agent-teams:team-reviewer` | All tools | Code review with structured findings | | `agent-teams:team-debugger` | All tools | Hypothesis-driven investigation | | `agent-teams:team-implementer` | All tools | Building features within file ownership boundaries | | `agent-teams:team-lead` | All tools | Team orchestration and coordination | **Key distinction**: Read-only agents (Explore, Plan) cannot modify files. Never assign implementation tasks to read-only agents. ## Display Mode Configuration Configure in `~/.claude/settings.json`: ```json { "teammateMode": "tmux" } ``` | Mode | Behavior | Best For | | -------------- | ------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------- | | `"tmux"` | Each teammate in a tmux pane | Development workflows, monitoring multiple agents | | `"iterm2"` | Each teammate in an iTerm2 tab | macOS users who prefer iTerm2 | | `"in-process"` | All teammates in same process | Simple tasks, CI/CD environments | ## Custom Team Guidelines When building custom teams: 1. **Every team needs a coordinator** — Either designate a `team-lead` or have the user coordinate directly 2. **Match roles to agent types** — Use specialized agents (reviewer, debugger, implementer) when available 3. **Avoid duplicate roles** — Two agents doing the same thing wastes resources 4. **Define boundaries upfront** — Each teammate needs clear ownership of files or responsibilities 5. **Keep it small** — 2-4 teammates is the sweet spot; 5+ requires significant coordination overhead
👍0
👁️0
🤖 Auto-discovered
🤖system prompt•7 months ago

langchain-architecture

Design LLM applications using LangChain 1.x and LangGraph for

coding
⭐1
# LangChain & LangGraph Architecture Master modern LangChain 1.x and LangGraph for building sophisticated LLM applications with agents, state management, memory, and tool integration. ## When to Use This Skill - Building autonomous AI agents with tool access - Implementing complex multi-step LLM workflows - Managing conversation memory and state - Integrating LLMs with external data sources and APIs - Creating modular, reusable LLM application components - Implementing document processing pipelines - Building production-grade LLM applications ## Package Structure (LangChain 1.x) ``` langchain (1.2.x) # High-level orchestration langchain-core (1.2.x) # Core abstractions (messages, prompts, tools) langchain-community # Third-party integrations langgraph # Agent orchestration and state management langchain-openai # OpenAI integrations langchain-anthropic # Anthropic/Claude integrations langchain-voyageai # Voyage AI embeddings langchain-pinecone # Pinecone vector store ``` ## Core Concepts ### 1. LangGraph Agents LangGraph is the standard for building agents in 2026. It provides: **Key Features:** - **StateGraph**: Explicit state management with typed state - **Durable Execution**: Agents persist through failures - **Human-in-the-Loop**: Inspect and modify state at any point - **Memory**: Short-term and long-term memory across sessions - **Checkpointing**: Save and resume agent state **Agent Patterns:** - **ReAct**: Reasoning + Acting with `create_react_agent` - **Plan-and-Execute**: Separate planning and execution nodes - **Multi-Agent**: Supervisor routing between specialized agents - **Tool-Calling**: Structured tool invocation with Pydantic schemas ### 2. State Management LangGraph uses TypedDict for explicit state: ```python from typing import Annotated, TypedDict from langgraph.graph import MessagesState # Simple message-based state class AgentState(MessagesState): """Extends MessagesState with custom fields.""" context: Annotated[list, "retrieved documents"] # Custom state for complex agents class CustomState(TypedDict): messages: Annotated[list, "conversation history"] context: Annotated[dict, "retrieved context"] current_step: str results: list ``` ### 3. Memory Systems Modern memory implementations: - **ConversationBufferMemory**: Stores all messages (short conversations) - **ConversationSummaryMemory**: Summarizes older messages (long conversations) - **ConversationTokenBufferMemory**: Token-based windowing - **VectorStoreRetrieverMemory**: Semantic similarity retrieval - **LangGraph Checkpointers**: Persistent state across sessions ### 4. Document Processing Loading, transforming, and storing documents: **Components:** - **Document Loaders**: Load from various sources - **Text Splitters**: Chunk documents intelligently - **Vector Stores**: Store and retrieve embeddings - **Retrievers**: Fetch relevant documents ### 5. Callbacks & Tracing LangSmith is the standard for observability: - Request/response logging - Token usage tracking - Latency monitoring - Error tracking - Trace visualization ## Quick Start ### Modern ReAct Agent with LangGraph ```python from langgraph.prebuilt import create_react_agent from langgraph.checkpoint.memory import MemorySaver from langchain_anthropic import ChatAnthropic from langchain_core.tools import tool import ast import operator # Initialize LLM (Claude Sonnet 4.6 recommended) llm = ChatAnthropic(model="claude-sonnet-4-6", temperature=0) # Define tools with Pydantic schemas @tool def search_database(query: str) -> str: """Search internal database for information.""" # Your database search logic return f"Results for: {query}" @tool def calculate(expression: str) -> str: """Safely evaluate a mathematical expression. Supports: +, -, *, /, **, %, parentheses Example: '(2 + 3) * 4' returns '20' """ # Safe math evaluation using ast allowed_operators = { ast.Add: operator.add, ast.Sub: operator.sub, ast.Mult: operator.mul, ast.Div: operator.truediv, ast.Pow: operator.pow, ast.Mod: operator.mod, ast.USub: operator.neg, } def _eval(node): if isinstance(node, ast.Constant): return node.value elif isinstance(node, ast.BinOp): left = _eval(node.left) right = _eval(node.right) return allowed_operators[type(node.op)](left, right) elif isinstance(node, ast.UnaryOp): operand = _eval(node.operand) return allowed_operators[type(node.op)](operand) else: raise ValueError(f"Unsupported operation: {type(node)}") try: tree = ast.parse(expression, mode='eval') return str(_eval(tree.body)) except Exception as e: return f"Error: {e}" tools = [search_database, calculate] # Create checkpointer for memory persistence checkpointer = MemorySaver() # Create ReAct agent agent = create_react_agent( llm, tools, checkpointer=checkpointer ) # Run agent with thread ID for memory config = {"configurable": {"thread_id": "user-123"}} result = await agent.ainvoke( {"messages": [("user", "Search for Python tutorials and calculate 25 * 4")]}, config=config ) ``` ## Architecture Patterns ### Pattern 1: RAG with LangGraph ```python from langgraph.graph import StateGraph, START, END from langchain_anthropic import ChatAnthropic from langchain_voyageai import VoyageAIEmbeddings from langchain_pinecone import PineconeVectorStore from langchain_core.documents import Document from langchain_core.prompts import ChatPromptTemplate from typing import TypedDict, Annotated class RAGState(TypedDict): question: str context: Annotated[list[Document], "retrieved documents"] answer: str # Initialize components llm = ChatAnthropic(model="claude-sonnet-4-6") embeddings = VoyageAIEmbeddings(model="voyage-3-large") vectorstore = PineconeVectorStore(index_name="docs", embedding=embeddings) retriever = vectorstore.as_retriever(search_kwargs={"k": 4}) # Define nodes async def retrieve(state: RAGState) -> RAGState: """Retrieve relevant documents.""" docs = await retriever.ainvoke(state["question"]) return {"context": docs} async def generate(state: RAGState) -> RAGState: """Generate answer from context.""" prompt = ChatPromptTemplate.from_template( """Answer based on the context below. If you cannot answer, say so. Context: {context} Question: {question} Answer:""" ) context_text = "\n\n".join(doc.page_content for doc in state["context"]) response = await llm.ainvoke( prompt.format(context=context_text, question=state["question"]) ) return {"answer": response.content} # Build graph builder = StateGraph(RAGState) builder.add_node("retrieve", retrieve) builder.add_node("generate", generate) builder.add_edge(START, "retrieve") builder.add_edge("retrieve", "generate") builder.add_edge("generate", END) rag_chain = builder.compile() # Use the chain result = await rag_chain.ainvoke({"question": "What is the main topic?"}) ``` ### Pattern 2: Custom Agent with Structured Tools ```python from langchain_core.tools import StructuredTool from pydantic import BaseModel, Field class SearchInput(BaseModel): """Input for database search.""" query: str = Field(description="Search query") filters: dict = Field(default={}, description="Optional filters") class EmailInput(BaseModel): """Input for sending email.""" recipient: str = Field(description="Email recipient") subject: str = Field(description="Email subject") content: str = Field(description="Email body") async def search_database(query: str, filters: dict = {}) -> str: """Search internal database for information.""" # Your database search logic return f"Results for '{query}' with filters {filters}" async def send_email(recipient: str, subject: str, content: str) -> str: """Send an email to specified recipient.""" # Email sending logic return f"Email sent to {recipient}" tools = [ StructuredTool.from_function( coroutine=search_database, name="search_database", description="Search internal database", args_schema=SearchInput ), StructuredTool.from_function( coroutine=send_email, name="send_email", description="Send an email", args_schema=EmailInput ) ] agent = create_react_agent(llm, tools) ``` ### Pattern 3: Multi-Step Workflow with StateGraph ```python from langgraph.graph import StateGraph, START, END from typing import TypedDict, Literal class WorkflowState(TypedDict): text: str entities: list analysis: str summary: str current_step: str async def extract_entities(state: WorkflowState) -> WorkflowState: """Extract key entities from text.""" prompt = f"Extract key entities from: {state['text']}\n\nReturn as JSON list." response = await llm.ainvoke(prompt) return {"entities": response.content, "current_step": "analyze"} async def analyze_entities(state: WorkflowState) -> WorkflowState: """Analyze extracted entities.""" prompt = f"Analyze these entities: {state['entities']}\n\nProvide insights." response = await llm.ainvoke(prompt) return {"analysis": response.content, "current_step": "summarize"} async def generate_summary(state: WorkflowState) -> WorkflowState: """Generate final summary.""" prompt = f"""Summarize: Entities: {state['entities']} Analysis: {state['analysis']} Provide a concise summary.""" response = await llm.ainvoke(prompt) return {"summary": response.content, "current_step": "complete"} def route_step(state: WorkflowState) -> Literal["analyze", "summarize", "end"]: """Route to next step based on current state.""" step = state.get("current_step", "extract") if step == "analyze": return "analyze" elif step == "summarize": return "summarize" return "end" # Build workflow builder = StateGraph(WorkflowState) builder.add_node("extract", extract_entities) builder.add_node("analyze", analyze_entities) builder.add_node("summarize", generate_summary) builder.add_edge(START, "extract") builder.add_conditional_edges("extract", route_step, { "analyze": "analyze", "summarize": "summarize", "end": END }) builder.add_conditional_edges("analyze", route_step, { "summarize": "summarize", "end": END }) builder.add_edge("summarize", END) workflow = builder.compile() ``` ### Pattern 4: Multi-Agent Orchestration ```python from langgraph.graph import StateGraph, START, END from langgraph.prebuilt import create_react_agent from langchain_core.messages import HumanMessage from typing import Literal class MultiAgentState(TypedDict): messages: list next_agent: str # Create specialized agents researcher = create_react_agent(llm, research_tools) writer = create_react_agent(llm, writing_tools) reviewer = create_react_agent(llm, review_tools) async def supervisor(state: MultiAgentState) -> MultiAgentState: """Route to appropriate agent based on task.""" prompt = f"""Based on the conversation, which agent should handle this? Options: - researcher: For finding information - writer: For creating content - reviewer: For reviewing and editing - FINISH: Task is complete Messages: {state['messages']} Respond with just the agent name.""" response = await llm.ainvoke(prompt) return {"next_agent": response.content.strip().lower()} def route_to_agent(state: MultiAgentState) -> Literal["researcher", "writer", "reviewer", "end"]: """Route based on supervisor decision.""" next_agent = state.get("next_agent", "").lower() if next_agent == "finish": return "end" return next_agent if next_agent in ["researcher", "writer", "reviewer"] else "end" # Build multi-agent graph builder = StateGraph(MultiAgentState) builder.add_node("supervisor", supervisor) builder.add_node("researcher", researcher) builder.add_node("writer", writer) builder.add_node("reviewer", reviewer) builder.add_edge(START, "supervisor") builder.add_conditional_edges("supervisor", route_to_agent, { "researcher": "researcher", "writer": "writer", "reviewer": "reviewer", "end": END }) # Each agent returns to supervisor for agent in ["researcher", "writer", "reviewer"]: builder.add_edge(agent, "supervisor") multi_agent = builder.compile() ``` ## Memory Management ### Token-Based Memory with LangGraph ```python from langgraph.checkpoint.memory import MemorySaver from langgraph.prebuilt import create_react_agent # In-memory checkpointer (development) checkpointer = MemorySaver() # Create agent with persistent memory agent = create_react_agent(llm, tools, checkpointer=checkpointer) # Each thread_id maintains separate conversation config = {"configurable": {"thread_id": "session-abc123"}} # Messages persist across invocations with same thread_id result1 = await agent.ainvoke({"messages": [("user", "My name is Alice")]}, config) result2 = await agent.ainvoke({"messages": [("user", "What's my name?")]}, config) # Agent remembers: "Your name is Alice" ``` ### Production Memory with PostgreSQL ```python from langgraph.checkpoint.postgres import PostgresSaver # Production checkpointer checkpointer = PostgresSaver.from_conn_string( "postgresql://user:pass@localhost/langgraph" ) agent = create_react_agent(llm, tools, checkpointer=checkpointer) ``` ### Vector Store Memory for Long-Term Context ```python from langchain_community.vectorstores import Chroma from langchain_voyageai import VoyageAIEmbeddings embeddings = VoyageAIEmbeddings(model="voyage-3-large") memory_store = Chroma( collection_name="conversation_memory", embedding_function=embeddings, persist_directory="./memory_db" ) async def retrieve_relevant_memory(query: str, k: int = 5) -> list: """Retrieve relevant past conversations.""" docs = await memory_store.asimilarity_search(query, k=k) return [doc.page_content for doc in docs] async def store_memory(content: str, metadata: dict = {}): """Store conversation in long-term memory.""" await memory_store.aadd_texts([content], metadatas=[metadata]) ``` ## Callback System & LangSmith ### LangSmith Tracing ```python import os from langchain_anthropic import ChatAnthropic # Enable LangSmith tracing os.environ["LANGCHAIN_TRACING_V2"] = "true" os.environ["LANGCHAIN_API_KEY"] = "your-api-key" os.environ["LANGCHAIN_PROJECT"] = "my-project" # All LangChain/LangGraph operations are automatically traced llm = ChatAnthropic(model="claude-sonnet-4-6") ``` ### Custom Callback Handler ```python from langchain_core.callbacks import BaseCallbackHandler from typing import Any, Dict, List class CustomCallbackHandler(BaseCallbackHandler): def on_llm_start( self, serialized: Dict[str, Any], prompts: List[str], **kwargs ) -> None: print(f"LLM started with {len(prompts)} prompts") def on_llm_end(self, response, **kwargs) -> None: print(f"LLM completed: {len(response.generations)} generations") def on_llm_error(self, error: Exception, **kwargs) -> None: print(f"LLM error: {error}") def on_tool_start( self, serialized: Dict[str, Any], input_str: str, **kwargs ) -> None: print(f"Tool started: {serialized.get('name')}") def on_tool_end(self, output: str, **kwargs) -> None: print(f"Tool completed: {output[:100]}...") # Use callbacks result = await agent.ainvoke( {"messages": [("user", "query")]}, config={"callbacks": [CustomCallbackHandler()]} ) ``` ## Streaming Responses ```python from langchain_anthropic import ChatAnthropic llm = ChatAnthropic(model="claude-sonnet-4-6", streaming=True) # Stream tokens async for chunk in llm.astream("Tell me a story"): print(chunk.content, end="", flush=True) # Stream agent events async for event in agent.astream_events( {"messages": [("user", "Search and summarize")]}, version="v2" ): if event["event"] == "on_chat_model_stream": print(event["data"]["chunk"].content, end="") elif event["event"] == "on_tool_start": print(f"\n[Using tool: {event['name']}]") ``` ## Testing Strategies ```python import pytest from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, patch @pytest.mark.asyncio async def test_agent_tool_selection(): """Test agent selects correct tool.""" with patch.object(llm, 'ainvoke') as mock_llm: mock_llm.return_value = AsyncMock(content="Using search_database") result = await agent.ainvoke({ "messages": [("user", "search for documents")] }) # Verify tool was called assert "search_database" in str(result) @pytest.mark.asyncio async def test_memory_persistence(): """Test memory persists across invocations.""" config = {"configurable": {"thread_id": "test-thread"}} # First message await agent.ainvoke( {"messages": [("user", "Remember: the code is 12345")]}, config ) # Second message should remember result = await agent.ainvoke( {"messages": [("user", "What was the code?")]}, config ) assert "12345" in result["messages"][-1].content ``` ## Performance Optimization ### 1. Caching with Redis ```python from langchain_community.cache import RedisCache from langchain_core.globals import set_llm_cache import redis redis_client = redis.Redis.from_url("redis://localhost:6379") set_llm_cache(RedisCache(redis_client)) ``` ### 2. Async Batch Processing ```python import asyncio from langchain_core.documents import Document async def process_documents(documents: list[Document]) -> list: """Process documents in parallel.""" tasks = [process_single(doc) for doc in documents] return await asyncio.gather(*tasks) async def process_single(doc: Document) -> dict: """Process a single document.""" chunks = text_splitter.split_documents([doc]) embeddings = await embeddings_model.aembed_documents( [c.page_content for c in chunks] ) return {"doc_id": doc.metadata.get("id"), "embeddings": embeddings} ``` ### 3. Connection Pooling ```python from langchain_pinecone import PineconeVectorStore from pinecone import Pinecone # Reuse Pinecone client pc = Pinecone(api_key=os.environ["PINECONE_API_KEY"]) index = pc.Index("my-index") # Create vector store with existing index vectorstore = PineconeVectorStore(index=index, embedding=embeddings) ``` ## Resources - [LangChain Documentation](https://python.langchain.com/docs/) - [LangGraph Documentation](https://langchain-ai.github.io/langgraph/) - [LangSmith Platform](https://smith.langchain.com/) - [LangChain GitHub](https://github.com/langchain-ai/langchain) - [LangGraph GitHub](https://github.com/langchain-ai/langgraph) ## Common Pitfalls 1. **Using Deprecated APIs**: Use LangGraph for agents, not `initialize_agent` 2. **Memory Overflow**: Use checkpointers with TTL for long-running agents 3. **Poor Tool Descriptions**: Clear descriptions help LLM select correct tools 4. **Context Window Exceeded**: Use summarization or sliding window memory 5. **No Error Handling**: Wrap too
👍0
👁️0
🤖 Auto-discovered