Skip to main content
EVOKORE// BROWSE
>

./browse/prompts

53 NODES
πŸ“textβ€’6 months ago

ARCH-AEP Tiered Remediation Cycle

Run a scope-locked remediation cycle that normalizes findings, revalidates them in parallel, and clears tiers with verification evidence.

architecture
⭐1
# ARCH-AEP Tiered Remediation Cycle Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this workflow when you need an orchestrated engineering review cycle with strict scope lock, tiered execution, and audit-grade evidence. ## Use this when - Large remediation efforts spanning multiple PRs - Parallel specialist review with shared backlog authority - Tracking verification evidence through closure ## Expected outcomes - Scope changes are controlled instead of creeping mid-cycle - Severity tiers drive remediation order predictably - Verification evidence is treated as part of done ## Source synthesis - CHELATEDAI/docs/ARCH AGENTIC ENGINEERING AND PLANNING/workflow.md (https://github.com/mattmre/CHELATEDAI/blob/main/docs/ARCH%20AGENTIC%20ENGINEERING%20AND%20PLANNING/workflow.md) - CHELATEDAI/docs/ARCH AGENTIC ENGINEERING AND PLANNING/orchestrator-briefing.md (https://github.com/mattmre/CHELATEDAI/blob/main/docs/ARCH%20AGENTIC%20ENGINEERING%20AND%20PLANNING/orchestrator-briefing.md) ## Dedupe notes Condenses the core ARCH-AEP workflow and briefing docs into a single remediation-cycle entry instead of importing both separately. ## Source excerpts ### CHELATEDAI/docs/ARCH AGENTIC ENGINEERING AND PLANNING/workflow.md ## Workflow (ARCH phase) 1. Scope lock - Define PR range and time window. - Freeze inputs (refinement report + framework + PR list). 2. Discovery + normalization - Orchestrator ingests `agentic-review-framework.md` and the latest refinement report. - Normalize all findings into a single backlog with unique IDs. - De-duplicate, merge overlaps, and assign provisional severity. - Record backlog in `docs/ARCH AGENTIC ENGINEERING AND PLANNING/backlog-YYYY-MM-DD.md`. 3. Parallel re-validation - Spawn specialist agents to re-validate findings against current main. - Each agent must attach exact file paths and line ranges. - Propose the smallest safe fix, acceptance criteria, and effort sizing (S/M/L). 4. Architecture and planning synthesis - Orchestrator merges validated findings into a master backlog. - Re-score and re-rank using the sorting model. - Identify dependency chains and blockers. ### CHELATEDAI/docs/ARCH AGENTIC ENGINEERING AND PLANNING/orchestrator-briefing.md Purpose: Quick reference for the ARCH-AEP documentation set, plus the narrative to start a new session. Full file index: `docs/INDEX.md` ## What Exists In This Folder - `README.md`: narrative overview and intent for ARCH-AEP. - `workflow.md`: end-to-end workflow specification with phases, guardrails, and enhancements. - `templates.md`: ID and branch conventions, tracker table format, and status log. - `backlog-template.md`: template for the master backlog file. - `backlog-index.md`: index of backlog files. - `next-session.md`: short handoff checklist for resuming work. - `phase-planning.md`: long-running planning record for the current cycle. - `schedule-and-tracking.md`: cadence, gates, and milestone tracking. - `agent-learning.md`: cross-session learnings and reusable patterns. - `change-log.md`: scope/defer decisions with audit context. - `risk-memo-template.md`: Critical/High risk memo template. - `risk-memos/README.md`: storage location for risk memos. - `phase-summary-template.md`: template for per-PR or per-phase summaries. - `phase-summaries/README.md`: storage location for phase summaries. - `verification-log.md`: test/build evidence mirror for PRs. - `tracker-pointer.md`: pointer to the active tracker file. - `tracker-index.md`: index of tracker files. - `scope-lock-t ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ“textβ€’6 months ago

Submodule Hygiene Workflow

Add, update, validate, document, and review git submodule changes without losing track of dependency state.

productivity
⭐1
# Submodule Hygiene Workflow Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this workflow when repositories rely on submodules and you need a disciplined way to update them safely. ## Use this when - Adding or updating repository submodules - Documenting submodule changes alongside code changes - Avoiding broken references during review ## Expected outcomes - Submodule changes are treated as a documented workflow - Validation happens before the review handoff - Dependency movement stays visible to the team ## Source synthesis - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/SUBMODULE_WORKFLOW.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/SUBMODULE_WORKFLOW.md) ## Dedupe notes Uses the dedicated submodule workflow doc because the guidance is operationally specific and not already represented on the site. ## Source excerpts ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/SUBMODULE_WORKFLOW.md This repository may consume external content through git submodules. Use this workflow to keep documentation updates reviewable and predictable. ## 1) Add or Register a Submodule ```bash git submodule add <repo-url> <target-path> git submodule update --init --recursive ``` Commit both: - `.gitmodules` - the submodule pointer change at `<target-path>` ## 2) Pull Latest Submodule Content ```bash git submodule update --remote --merge git submodule update --init --recursive ``` Then inspect: ```bash git status git diff --submodule ``` ## 3) Validate Submodule Cleanliness (Local + CI) Run the same guard used in CI before opening your PR: ```bash git submodule status --recursive node scripts/validate-submodule-cleanliness.js ``` Cleanliness semantics: - `-` => uninitialized submodule - `+` => submodule commit mismatch (worktree vs gitlink pointer) - `U` => submodule merge conflict - dirty submodule worktree => non-empty `git -C <submodule> status --porcelain` Submodule paths can include spaces (for example `SKILLS/ANTHROPIC COOKBOOK`), so always quote path arguments when running manual `git -C` commands. ## 4) Update Docs in This Repo When a submodule changes behavior, update: - `docs/README.md` if canonical links changed - `docs/USAGE.md` / `docs/TROUBLESHOOTING.md` if runtime guidance changed - `README.md` / `CONTRIBUTING.md` if contributor workflow changed ## 5) PR Expectations For submodule-related PRs: 1. Commit inside the submodule first. 2. Return to the parent repo and verify `git submodule status` has no unexpected `-dirty` entries. 3. Commit the updated submodule pointer in the parent repository. 4. Include any matching docs updates in this repository. 5. Mention the upstream submodule commit SHA in the PR description.
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ“textβ€’6 months ago

PR Merge Boundary Validation Runbook

Validate chained pull requests at each merge boundary with explicit checks, stale-approval handling, and rollback awareness.

devops
⭐1
# PR Merge Boundary Validation Runbook Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this runbook when a merge sequence spans dependent pull requests and each boundary needs fresh validation. ## Use this when - Managing dependency-chained pull requests - Refreshing stale approvals near merge time - Reducing merge surprises through checkpoint validation ## Expected outcomes - Each merge boundary has a concrete verification step - Review freshness stays visible as branches evolve - Rollback planning is captured before the merge happens ## Source synthesis - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/PR_MERGE_RUNBOOK.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/PR_MERGE_RUNBOOK.md) ## Dedupe notes Keeps the merge-boundary validation concept separate from more general workflow or orchestration docs. ## Source excerpts ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/PR_MERGE_RUNBOOK.md Operator runbook for reliable merges and context-rot prevention. ## Pre-merge Checklist - [ ] PR scope matches approved plan - [ ] PR description is filled using `.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md` - [ ] PR metadata automation check (`scripts/validate-pr-metadata.js`) is passing for pull_request CI runs - [ ] Required tests pass locally/CI - [ ] Docs updated for user-facing behavior changes - [ ] Release-impacting changes called out - [ ] Follow-up issues captured (if any) ## Required Checks by Change Type Use this as the minimum check set before approval and merge: | Change type | Required checks | | --- | --- | | Docs-only changes | `node test-docs-canonical-links.js` | | Ops/docs process changes (`docs/PR_MERGE_RUNBOOK.md`, `next-session.md`, orchestration docs) | `node test-ops-docs-validation.js` and `node test-docs-canonical-links.js` | | Source/tooling/config changes (`src/`, `scripts/`, workflow/config files) | Relevant targeted tests for touched area plus CI-required suite | | Release-flow changes | `node test-npm-release-flow-validation.js` plus docs/link checks | If a PR spans multiple change types, run the union of required checks. ## Reviewer Responsibilities - Confirm PR scope and dependency assumptions are explicit in description. - Confirm PR metadata fields from `.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md` are complete. - Verify required checks for each change type are attached in PR evidence. - Block approval if dependency base PR is not merged or branch is stale. - Approve only the current chain head; do not pre-approve non-head dependent PRs. - Confirm all review conversations are resolved before final approval. - Ensure merge strategy and rollback notes are documented for risky changes. ## Merge Steps 1. Rebase or update branch with latest target branch. 2. Re-run required validations. 3. Confirm reviewer approvals and resolved conversations. 4. Merge via approved strategy. 5. Record merge commit/PR number in tracker. ## Merge-boundary Checkpoints At every dependency merge boundary (`base -> dependent`): 1. Rebase dependent PR branch on latest `main` immediately after parent merge. 2. Re-run required checks and attach updated evidence in PR metadata. 3. Revalidate approvals for the new head state (stale approvals must be refreshed). 4. Confirm merge-boundary revalidation notes are updated before merge. ## Merge-order Controls (Dependency Chain) 1. Define merge order explicitly in PR descriptions (`base -> dependent`). 2. Merge only the current chain head; hold dependents until parent merge is complete. 3. After each merge, rebase ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ€–system promptβ€’6 months ago

Multi-Server MCP Aggregation Pattern

Aggregate tools across multiple MCP child servers with prefixing, collision avoidance, and routing rules that stay deterministic.

architecture
⭐1
# Multi-Server MCP Aggregation Pattern Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this pattern when an MCP host must broker tools from multiple child servers without sacrificing clarity or control. ## Use this when - Combining tools from several MCP backends - Avoiding tool-name collisions across providers - Keeping origin and routing visible during execution ## Expected outcomes - Server-prefixed names make tool origins obvious - Collisions are avoided without brittle manual renaming - Operators can extend the tool surface without losing determinism ## Source synthesis - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/AGENT33_IMPROVEMENT_INSTRUCTIONS.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/AGENT33_IMPROVEMENT_INSTRUCTIONS.md) - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/TOOLS_AND_DISCOVERY.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/TOOLS_AND_DISCOVERY.md) ## Dedupe notes Uses the improvement-transfer doc as the primary source, with the discovery doc covering prefixing and compatibility details. ## Source excerpts ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/AGENT33_IMPROVEMENT_INSTRUCTIONS.md > **Purpose**: Feed this file into Claude Code CLI when working on the Agent33 repo. It contains patterns, architectures, and capabilities proven in EVOKORE-MCP that Agent33 should adopt. --- ## 1. Multi-Server MCP Aggregation Pattern **What Agent33 lacks**: Agent33's MCP server (Phase 43) is a single-endpoint bridge. It doesn't aggregate multiple child MCP servers behind a unified namespace. **What to build**: A proxy layer that spawns and manages multiple child MCP servers from a single config file, presenting them as one unified tool surface. ### Implementation spec: ``` mcp.config.json { "servers": { "github": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-github"], "env": { "GITHUB_TOKEN": "${GITHUB_TOKEN}" } }, "fs": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem", "./"] }, "elevenlabs": { "command": "uvx", "args": ["elevenlabs-mcp"], "env": { "ELEVENLABS_API_KEY": "${ELEVENLABS_API_KEY}" } } } } ``` **Key patterns from EVOKORE**: - **Tool name prefixing**: Every proxied tool gets renamed `{serverId}_{originalName}` to prevent namespace collisions (e.g., `github_create_issue`, `fs_read_file`). First-registration-wins for duplicates. - **Environment interpolation**: `${VAR}` syntax in `env` blocks resolved ... ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/TOOLS_AND_DISCOVERY.md This page explains how EVOKORE presents tools, how proxy names are built, and how `discover_tools` changes the visible tool surface. ## Two tool populations ### Native EVOKORE tools These tools are defined by EVOKORE itself: - `docs_architect` - `skill_creator` - `resolve_workflow` - `search_skills` - `get_skill_help` - `discover_tools` Properties: - always available - always visible - not subject to proxy prefixing ### Proxied child-server tools These come from child servers in `mcp.config.json`. Current configured sources: - `github` - `fs` - optional `elevenlabs` Properties: - fetched from child servers at startup - renamed with server prefixes - governed by `permissions.yml` - routed through `ProxyManager` ## Prefixing and compatibility EVOKORE rewrites proxied tool names to: ```text ${serverId}_${tool.name} ``` Why this exists: - prevents tool-name collisions across child servers - makes origin obvious during execution and review - keeps exact-name routing deterministic Examples: | Upstream tool | EVOKORE-exposed tool | |---|---| | `read_file` from `fs` | `fs_read_file` | | `create_issue` from `github` | `github_create_issue` | ### Duplicate-prefixed name policy If two child registrations would create the same final prefixed name: - the first registrati ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ€–system promptβ€’6 months ago

Human-in-the-Loop Approval Token Workflow

Gate risky tool execution behind approval tokens so agents can retry safely after a human reviewer signs off.

security
⭐1
# Human-in-the-Loop Approval Token Workflow Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this workflow when autonomous execution needs a durable handoff from human review back into the agent loop. ## Use this when - Retrying a blocked tool call after approval - Adding a human checkpoint to sensitive actions - Reducing insecure workarounds around approval flows ## Expected outcomes - Approval becomes a reusable tokenized workflow - Agents resume work without losing execution context - Security controls stay explicit instead of being implied ## Source synthesis - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/V2_MULTI_AGENT_WORKFLOWS.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/V2_MULTI_AGENT_WORKFLOWS.md) - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/AGENT33_IMPROVEMENT_INSTRUCTIONS.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/AGENT33_IMPROVEMENT_INSTRUCTIONS.md) ## Dedupe notes Synthesizes the approval-token concept from the main workflow doc and the Agent33 improvement transfer notes. ## Source excerpts ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/V2_MULTI_AGENT_WORKFLOWS.md With EVOKORE-MCP v2.0 fully operational, we can now leverage 40+ proxied GitHub and Filesystem tools seamlessly within complex multi-agent workflows. The core architectural advancements include: ## 1. Dynamic Tool Prefixing & Indexing Instead of loading 40+ tools into an LLM's context window statically (which causes massive bloat), EVOKORE's `ProxyManager` boots child servers (like `@modelcontextprotocol/server-github` and `@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem`) and dynamically prefixes their tools (`github_create_issue`, `fs_write_file`). This prevents namespace collisions while keeping the tools accessible to native skills. ## 2. Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) Security Interceptor Automated multi-agent workflows involving sensitive endpoints (like GitHub write access or file deletion) are governed by EVOKORE's stateless `_evokore_approval_token` architecture. - When an agent attempts a restricted action, the tool call is intercepted and blocked. - The server returns an error explicitly commanding the agent to prompt the human for approval. - Upon approval, the agent retries the exact tool call with the injected token, securely fulfilling the workflow without severing the conversational context. ## 3. Active Skill Orchestration (Native Harnessing) Unlike v1.0 where skills merel ... ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/AGENT33_IMPROVEMENT_INSTRUCTIONS.md > **Purpose**: Feed this file into Claude Code CLI when working on the Agent33 repo. It contains patterns, architectures, and capabilities proven in EVOKORE-MCP that Agent33 should adopt. --- ## 1. Multi-Server MCP Aggregation Pattern **What Agent33 lacks**: Agent33's MCP server (Phase 43) is a single-endpoint bridge. It doesn't aggregate multiple child MCP servers behind a unified namespace. **What to build**: A proxy layer that spawns and manages multiple child MCP servers from a single config file, presenting them as one unified tool surface. ### Implementation spec: ``` mcp.config.json { "servers": { "github": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-github"], "env": { "GITHUB_TOKEN": "${GITHUB_TOKEN}" } }, "fs": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem", "./"] }, "elevenlabs": { "command": "uvx", "args": ["elevenlabs-mcp"], "env": { "ELEVENLABS_API_KEY": "${ELEVENLABS_API_KEY}" } } } } ``` **Key patterns from EVOKORE**: - **Tool name prefixing**: Every proxied tool gets renamed `{serverId}_{originalName}` to prevent namespace collisions (e.g., `github_create_issue`, `fs_read_file`). First-registration-wins for duplicates. - **Environment interpolation**: `${VAR}` syntax in `env` blocks resolved ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ€–system promptβ€’6 months ago

Dynamic Tool Discovery and Session Activation

Expose only native tools at session start, then activate proxied tools on demand through a searchable discovery layer.

architecture
⭐1
# Dynamic Tool Discovery and Session Activation Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this skill when you need smaller tool payloads, exact-name compatibility, and session-scoped tool activation. ## Use this when - Reducing tool-list bloat for focused sessions - Preserving exact-name tool calls while hiding noise - Activating proxied tools only when a task requires them ## Expected outcomes - Discovery changes listing visibility without breaking routing - Session-scoped activation keeps tools relevant to the task - Operators can trade compatibility against payload size intentionally ## Source synthesis - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/TOOLS_AND_DISCOVERY.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/TOOLS_AND_DISCOVERY.md) ## Dedupe notes Uses the canonical EVOKORE-MCP discovery doc instead of duplicating the same concept from walkthrough and migration docs. ## Source excerpts ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/TOOLS_AND_DISCOVERY.md This page explains how EVOKORE presents tools, how proxy names are built, and how `discover_tools` changes the visible tool surface. ## Two tool populations ### Native EVOKORE tools These tools are defined by EVOKORE itself: - `docs_architect` - `skill_creator` - `resolve_workflow` - `search_skills` - `get_skill_help` - `discover_tools` Properties: - always available - always visible - not subject to proxy prefixing ### Proxied child-server tools These come from child servers in `mcp.config.json`. Current configured sources: - `github` - `fs` - optional `elevenlabs` Properties: - fetched from child servers at startup - renamed with server prefixes - governed by `permissions.yml` - routed through `ProxyManager` ## Prefixing and compatibility EVOKORE rewrites proxied tool names to: ```text ${serverId}_${tool.name} ``` Why this exists: - prevents tool-name collisions across child servers - makes origin obvious during execution and review - keeps exact-name routing deterministic Examples: | Upstream tool | EVOKORE-exposed tool | |---|---| | `read_file` from `fs` | `fs_read_file` | | `create_issue` from `github` | `github_create_issue` | ### Duplicate-prefixed name policy If two child registrations would create the same final prefixed name: - the first registration wins - later duplicates are skipped - EVOKORE logs a warning and duplicate summary ## Discovery modes | Mode | What `tools/list` returns | Best for | |---|---|---| | `legacy` | all native + proxied tools | maximum compatibility | | `dynamic` | native tools + session-activated proxied tools | smaller initial tool payloads | Environment toggle: ```bash EVOKORE_TOOL_DISCOVERY_MODE=legacy EVOKORE_TOOL_DISCOVERY_MODE=dynamic ``` ## Dynamic discovery lifecycle In `dynamic` mode, EVOKORE uses a session-scoped activation set. Lifecycle: 1. session starts with only native tools visible 2. user/model calls `discover_tools` 3. `ToolCatalogIndex` searches the merged native + proxied catalog 4. matching proxied tools are activated for that session 5. EVOKORE emits `sendToolListChanged()` best-effort 6. client re-runs `tools/list` or auto-refreshes ```mermaid flowchart TD A[Session starts in dynamic mode] --> B[tools/list shows native tools] B --> C[discover_tools query] C --> D[ToolCatalogIndex searches merged catalog] D --> E[Matching proxied tools added to session activation set] E --> F[sendToolListChanged best-effort] F --> G[Client refreshes tools/list] G --> H[Activated proxied tools now visible] D --> I[Exact-name proxied call still works eve ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ“textβ€’6 months ago

Improvement Cycle Review Wizard

Run a live improvement-cycle workflow that links review artifacts, approvals, tool requests, and operator checkpoints.

productivity
⭐1
# Improvement Cycle Review Wizard Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this workflow when an operator needs a guided improvement cycle with live status, explicit approvals, and linked artifacts. ## Use this when - Operational review sessions with live progress - Approval-heavy improvement cycles - Coordinating review artifacts with execution steps ## Expected outcomes - Live workflow execution remains visible to operators - Artifacts, approvals, and tool requests stay connected - Improvement loops become easier to audit and rerun ## Source synthesis - AGENT33/docs/phase25-26-live-review-walkthrough.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/phase25-26-live-review-walkthrough.md) - AGENT33/docs/operator-improvement-cycle-and-jupyter.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/operator-improvement-cycle-and-jupyter.md) ## Dedupe notes Merges AGENT33 live review walkthrough details with the shorter operator-focused improvement-cycle guide. ## Source excerpts ### AGENT33/docs/phase25-26-live-review-walkthrough.md This guide documents the operator flow introduced by the Phase 25 live workflow transport and the Phase 26/27 improvement-cycle review wizard stack. ## Scope - Live workflow execution with run-scoped graph refresh - WebSocket-first status streaming with authenticated SSE fallback - Improvement-cycle preset creation - Explanation artifact generation for `plan_review` and `diff_review` - Linked review creation, risk assessment, L1/L2 signoff, and final approval - Pending tool-approval triage inside the same workflow domain > Note > This walkthrough reflects the review stack built on `codex/session58-phase26-wizard` and validated in `codex/session60-phase22-docs-validation`. If the related PRs are still open, `main` may not yet expose every surface described here. ## Operator Flow ```mermaid sequenceDiagram participant UI as "Frontend Control Plane" participant WF as "Workflow APIs" participant VIZ as "Visualization APIs" participant EXP as "Explanation APIs" participant REV as "Review APIs" participant HITL as "Tool Approval APIs" UI->>WF: "POST /v1/workflows/{name}/execute (single mode, caller run_id)" UI->>VIZ: "GET /v1/visualizations/workflows/{workflow_id}/graph?run_id=..." UI->>WF: "WS /v1/workflows/{run_id}/ws" alt "WebSocket unav ... ### AGENT33/docs/operator-improvement-cycle-and-jupyter.md This guide covers the merged operator surfaces for: - the Phase 26 improvement-cycle review wizard - the Phase 27 canonical workflow presets - the Phase 38 Docker-backed Jupyter kernel workflow Use it when you want the shortest current path from UI entry point to a real workflow run. ## 1. Improvement-Cycle Wizard The wizard is mounted inside the frontend control plane under the `Workflows` domain. ### Entry path 1. Open the frontend at `http://localhost:3000` 2. Authenticate with a bearer token or API key 3. Open `Advanced Settings` 4. Select the `Workflows` domain 5. Use the `Improvement Cycle Wizard` panel at the top of the page ### What the wizard does The wizard stitches together the backend surfaces that previously had to be called manually: - plan review / diff review generation - review creation and risk assessment - L1 and L2 review submission - tool approval request review and decision capture Reference implementation: - frontend: `frontend/src/features/improvement-cycle/ImprovementCycleWizard.tsx` - tests: `frontend/src/features/improvement-cycle/ImprovementCycleWizard.test.tsx` For the detailed review flow, keep using: - [`phase25-26-live-review-walkthrough.md`](phase25-26-live-review-walkthrough.md) ## 2. Canonical Workflow Presets The `Workflows` doma ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ“textβ€’6 months ago

Guardrailed Code Review Pipeline

Run a staged code review workflow with explicit risk assessment, reviewer handoffs, and merge gates.

coding
⭐1
# Guardrailed Code Review Pipeline Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this workflow when a change needs structured review evidence, clear approval stages, and a rollback-aware path to merge. ## Use this when - Multi-step L1 and L2 review signoff - High-risk changes that need audit trails - Standardizing reviewer decisions before merge ## Expected outcomes - Review states and approval checkpoints stay explicit - Risk assessment and evidence are captured before merge - The workflow remains small enough to reuse across repositories ## Source synthesis - AGENT33/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md) - AGENT33/docs/walkthroughs.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/walkthroughs.md) ## Dedupe notes Combines AGENT33 lifecycle mapping and operator walkthrough material into one review-oriented site entry. ## Source excerpts ### AGENT33/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md ### 4.1 Review Lifecycle States: - `draft -> ready -> l1-review -> l1-approved -> (optional l2-review -> l2-approved) -> approved -> merged` Main APIs: - `/v1/reviews/{id}/assess` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/assign-l1` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/l1` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/assign-l2` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/l2` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/approve` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/merge` ### AGENT33/docs/walkthroughs.md ## 4. Review Lifecycle (Two-Layer Signoff) Create review: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/ \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"task_id":"TASK-101","branch":"feat/docs-refresh","pr_number":12}' ``` Assess risk: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/assess \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"triggers":["api-public","security"]}' ``` Move to ready and assign L1: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/ready -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/assign-l1 -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" ``` Submit L1 decision: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/l1 \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"decision":"approved","issues":[],"comments":"L1 pass"}' ``` If L2 required, continue: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/assign-l2 -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/l2 \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"decision":"approved","issues":[],"commen ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

deployment-pipeline-design

Design multi-stage CI/CD pipelines with approval gates, security

coding
⭐1
# Deployment Pipeline Design Architecture patterns for multi-stage CI/CD pipelines with approval gates and deployment strategies. ## Purpose Design robust, secure deployment pipelines that balance speed with safety through proper stage organization and approval workflows. ## When to Use - Design CI/CD architecture - Implement deployment gates - Configure multi-environment pipelines - Establish deployment best practices - Implement progressive delivery ## Pipeline Stages ### Standard Pipeline Flow ``` β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ Build β”‚ β†’ β”‚ Test β”‚ β†’ β”‚ Staging β”‚ β†’ β”‚ Approveβ”‚ β†’ β”‚Productionβ”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ ``` ### Detailed Stage Breakdown 1. **Source** - Code checkout 2. **Build** - Compile, package, containerize 3. **Test** - Unit, integration, security scans 4. **Staging Deploy** - Deploy to staging environment 5. **Integration Tests** - E2E, smoke tests 6. **Approval Gate** - Manual approval required 7. **Production Deploy** - Canary, blue-green, rolling 8. **Verification** - Health checks, monitoring 9. **Rollback** - Automated rollback on failure ## Approval Gate Patterns ### Pattern 1: Manual Approval ```yaml # GitHub Actions production-deploy: needs: staging-deploy environment: name: production url: https://app.example.com runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - name: Deploy to production run: | # Deployment commands ``` ### Pattern 2: Time-Based Approval ```yaml # GitLab CI deploy:production: stage: deploy script: - deploy.sh production environment: name: production when: delayed start_in: 30 minutes only: - main ``` ### Pattern 3: Multi-Approver ```yaml # Azure Pipelines stages: - stage: Production dependsOn: Staging jobs: - deployment: Deploy environment: name: production resourceType: Kubernetes strategy: runOnce: preDeploy: steps: - task: ManualValidation@0 inputs: notifyUsers: "team-leads@example.com" instructions: "Review staging metrics before approving" ``` **Reference:** See `assets/approval-gate-template.yml` ## Deployment Strategies ### 1. Rolling Deployment ```yaml apiVersion: apps/v1 kind: Deployment metadata: name: my-app spec: replicas: 10 strategy: type: RollingUpdate rollingUpdate: maxSurge: 2 maxUnavailable: 1 ``` **Characteristics:** - Gradual rollout - Zero downtime - Easy rollback - Best for most applications ### 2. Blue-Green Deployment ```yaml # Blue (current) kubectl apply -f blue-deployment.yaml kubectl label service my-app version=blue # Green (new) kubectl apply -f green-deployment.yaml # Test green environment kubectl label service my-app version=green # Rollback if needed kubectl label service my-app version=blue ``` **Characteristics:** - Instant switchover - Easy rollback - Doubles infrastructure cost temporarily - Good for high-risk deployments ### 3. Canary Deployment ```yaml apiVersion: argoproj.io/v1alpha1 kind: Rollout metadata: name: my-app spec: replicas: 10 strategy: canary: steps: - setWeight: 10 - pause: { duration: 5m } - setWeight: 25 - pause: { duration: 5m } - setWeight: 50 - pause: { duration: 5m } - setWeight: 100 ``` **Characteristics:** - Gradual traffic shift - Risk mitigation - Real user testing - Requires service mesh or similar ### 4. Feature Flags ```python from flagsmith import Flagsmith flagsmith = Flagsmith(environment_key="API_KEY") if flagsmith.has_feature("new_checkout_flow"): # New code path process_checkout_v2() else: # Existing code path process_checkout_v1() ``` **Characteristics:** - Deploy without releasing - A/B testing - Instant rollback - Granular control ## Pipeline Orchestration ### Multi-Stage Pipeline Example ```yaml name: Production Pipeline on: push: branches: [main] jobs: build: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - name: Build application run: make build - name: Build Docker image run: docker build -t myapp:${{ github.sha }} . - name: Push to registry run: docker push myapp:${{ github.sha }} test: needs: build runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - name: Unit tests run: make test - name: Security scan run: trivy image myapp:${{ github.sha }} deploy-staging: needs: test runs-on: ubuntu-latest environment: name: staging steps: - name: Deploy to staging run: kubectl apply -f k8s/staging/ integration-test: needs: deploy-staging runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - name: Run E2E tests run: npm run test:e2e deploy-production: needs: integration-test runs-on: ubuntu-latest environment: name: production steps: - name: Canary deployment run: | kubectl apply -f k8s/production/ kubectl argo rollouts promote my-app verify: needs: deploy-production runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - name: Health check run: curl -f https://app.example.com/health - name: Notify team run: | curl -X POST ${{ secrets.SLACK_WEBHOOK }} \ -d '{"text":"Production deployment successful!"}' ``` ## Pipeline Best Practices 1. **Fail fast** - Run quick tests first 2. **Parallel execution** - Run independent jobs concurrently 3. **Caching** - Cache dependencies between runs 4. **Artifact management** - Store build artifacts 5. **Environment parity** - Keep environments consistent 6. **Secrets management** - Use secret stores (Vault, etc.) 7. **Deployment windows** - Schedule deployments appropriately 8. **Monitoring integration** - Track deployment metrics 9. **Rollback automation** - Auto-rollback on failures 10. **Documentation** - Document pipeline stages ## Rollback Strategies ### Automated Rollback ```yaml deploy-and-verify: steps: - name: Deploy new version run: kubectl apply -f k8s/ - name: Wait for rollout run: kubectl rollout status deployment/my-app - name: Health check id: health run: | for i in {1..10}; do if curl -sf https://app.example.com/health; then exit 0 fi sleep 10 done exit 1 - name: Rollback on failure if: failure() run: kubectl rollout undo deployment/my-app ``` ### Manual Rollback ```bash # List revision history kubectl rollout history deployment/my-app # Rollback to previous version kubectl rollout undo deployment/my-app # Rollback to specific revision kubectl rollout undo deployment/my-app --to-revision=3 ``` ## Monitoring and Metrics ### Key Pipeline Metrics - **Deployment Frequency** - How often deployments occur - **Lead Time** - Time from commit to production - **Change Failure Rate** - Percentage of failed deployments - **Mean Time to Recovery (MTTR)** - Time to recover from failure - **Pipeline Success Rate** - Percentage of successful runs - **Average Pipeline Duration** - Time to complete pipeline ### Integration with Monitoring ```yaml - name: Post-deployment verification run: | # Wait for metrics stabilization sleep 60 # Check error rate ERROR_RATE=$(curl -s "$PROMETHEUS_URL/api/v1/query?query=rate(http_errors_total[5m])" | jq '.data.result[0].value[1]') if (( $(echo "$ERROR_RATE > 0.01" | bc -l) )); then echo "Error rate too high: $ERROR_RATE" exit 1 fi ``` ## Reference Files - `references/pipeline-orchestration.md` - Complex pipeline patterns - `assets/approval-gate-template.yml` - Approval workflow templates ## Related Skills - `github-actions-templates` - For GitHub Actions implementation - `gitlab-ci-patterns` - For GitLab CI implementation - `secrets-management` - For secrets handling
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

context-driven-development

Creates and maintains project context artifacts (product.md,

coding
⭐1
# Context-Driven Development Guide for implementing and maintaining context as a managed artifact alongside code, enabling consistent AI interactions and team alignment through structured project documentation. ## When to Use This Skill - Setting up new projects with Conductor - Understanding the relationship between context artifacts - Maintaining consistency across AI-assisted development sessions - Onboarding team members to an existing Conductor project - Deciding when to update context documents - Managing greenfield vs brownfield project contexts ## Core Philosophy Context-Driven Development treats project context as a first-class artifact managed alongside code. Instead of relying on ad-hoc prompts or scattered documentation, establish a persistent, structured foundation that informs all AI interactions. Key principles: 1. **Context precedes code**: Define what you're building and how before implementation 2. **Living documentation**: Context artifacts evolve with the project 3. **Single source of truth**: One canonical location for each type of information 4. **AI alignment**: Consistent context produces consistent AI behavior ## The Workflow Follow the **Context β†’ Spec & Plan β†’ Implement** workflow: 1. **Context Phase**: Establish or verify project context artifacts exist and are current 2. **Specification Phase**: Define requirements and acceptance criteria for work units 3. **Planning Phase**: Break specifications into phased, actionable tasks 4. **Implementation Phase**: Execute tasks following established workflow patterns ## Artifact Relationships ### product.md - Defines WHAT and WHY Purpose: Captures product vision, goals, target users, and business context. Contents: - Product name and one-line description - Problem statement and solution approach - Target user personas - Core features and capabilities - Success metrics and KPIs - Product roadmap (high-level) Update when: - Product vision or goals change - New major features are planned - Target audience shifts - Business priorities evolve ### product-guidelines.md - Defines HOW to Communicate Purpose: Establishes brand voice, messaging standards, and communication patterns. Contents: - Brand voice and tone guidelines - Terminology and glossary - Error message conventions - User-facing copy standards - Documentation style Update when: - Brand guidelines change - New terminology is introduced - Communication patterns need refinement ### tech-stack.md - Defines WITH WHAT Purpose: Documents technology choices, dependencies, and architectural decisions. Contents: - Primary languages and frameworks - Key dependencies with versions - Infrastructure and deployment targets - Development tools and environment - Testing frameworks - Code quality tools Update when: - Adding new dependencies - Upgrading major versions - Changing infrastructure - Adopting new tools or patterns ### workflow.md - Defines HOW to Work Purpose: Establishes development practices, quality gates, and team workflows. Contents: - Development methodology (TDD, etc.) - Git workflow and commit conventions - Code review requirements - Testing requirements and coverage targets - Quality assurance gates - Deployment procedures Update when: - Team practices evolve - Quality standards change - New workflow patterns are adopted ### tracks.md - Tracks WHAT'S HAPPENING Purpose: Registry of all work units with status and metadata. Contents: - Active tracks with current status - Completed tracks with completion dates - Track metadata (type, priority, assignee) - Links to individual track directories Update when: - New tracks are created - Track status changes - Tracks are completed or archived See [references/artifact-templates.md](references/artifact-templates.md) for copy-paste starter templates. ## Context Maintenance Principles ### Keep Artifacts Synchronized Ensure changes in one artifact reflect in related documents: - New feature in product.md β†’ Update tech-stack.md if new dependencies needed - Completed track β†’ Update product.md to reflect new capabilities - Workflow change β†’ Update all affected track plans ### Update tech-stack.md When Adding Dependencies Before adding any new dependency: 1. Check if existing dependencies solve the need 2. Document the rationale for new dependencies 3. Add version constraints 4. Note any configuration requirements ### Update product.md When Features Complete After completing a feature track: 1. Move feature from "planned" to "implemented" in product.md 2. Update any affected success metrics 3. Document any scope changes from original plan ### Verify Context Before Implementation Before starting any track: 1. Read all context artifacts 2. Flag any outdated information 3. Propose updates before proceeding 4. Confirm context accuracy with stakeholders ## Greenfield vs Brownfield Handling ### Greenfield Projects (New) For new projects: 1. Run `/conductor:setup` to create all artifacts interactively 2. Answer questions about product vision, tech preferences, and workflow 3. Generate initial style guides for chosen languages 4. Create empty tracks registry Characteristics: - Full control over context structure - Define standards before code exists - Establish patterns early ### Brownfield Projects (Existing) For existing codebases: 1. Run `/conductor:setup` with existing codebase detection 2. System analyzes existing code, configs, and documentation 3. Pre-populate artifacts based on discovered patterns 4. Review and refine generated context Characteristics: - Extract implicit context from existing code - Reconcile existing patterns with desired patterns - Document technical debt and modernization plans - Preserve working patterns while establishing standards ## Benefits ### Team Alignment - New team members onboard faster with explicit context - Consistent terminology and conventions across the team - Shared understanding of product goals and technical decisions ### AI Consistency - AI assistants produce aligned outputs across sessions - Reduced need to re-explain context in each interaction - Predictable behavior based on documented standards ### Institutional Memory - Decisions and rationale are preserved - Context survives team changes - Historical context informs future decisions ### Quality Assurance - Standards are explicit and verifiable - Deviations from context are detectable - Quality gates are documented and enforceable ## Directory Structure ``` conductor/ β”œβ”€β”€ index.md # Navigation hub linking all artifacts β”œβ”€β”€ product.md # Product vision and goals β”œβ”€β”€ product-guidelines.md # Communication standards β”œβ”€β”€ tech-stack.md # Technology preferences β”œβ”€β”€ workflow.md # Development practices β”œβ”€β”€ tracks.md # Work unit registry β”œβ”€β”€ setup_state.json # Resumable setup state β”œβ”€β”€ code_styleguides/ # Language-specific conventions β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ python.md β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ typescript.md β”‚ └── ... └── tracks/ └── <track-id>/ β”œβ”€β”€ spec.md β”œβ”€β”€ plan.md β”œβ”€β”€ metadata.json └── index.md ``` ## Context Lifecycle 1. **Creation**: Initial setup via `/conductor:setup` 2. **Validation**: Verify before each track 3. **Evolution**: Update as project grows 4. **Synchronization**: Keep artifacts aligned 5. **Archival**: Document historical decisions ## Context Validation Checklist Before starting implementation on any track, validate context: ### Product Context - [ ] product.md reflects current product vision - [ ] Target users are accurately described - [ ] Feature list is up to date - [ ] Success metrics are defined ### Technical Context - [ ] tech-stack.md lists all current dependencies - [ ] Version numbers are accurate - [ ] Infrastructure targets are correct - [ ] Development tools are documented ### Workflow Context - [ ] workflow.md describes current practices - [ ] Quality gates are defined - [ ] Coverage targets are specified - [ ] Commit conventions are documented ### Track Context - [ ] tracks.md shows all active work - [ ] No stale or abandoned tracks - [ ] Dependencies between tracks are noted ## Common Anti-Patterns Avoid these context management mistakes: ### Stale Context Problem: Context documents become outdated and misleading. Solution: Update context as part of each track's completion process. ### Context Sprawl Problem: Information scattered across multiple locations. Solution: Use the defined artifact structure; resist creating new document types. ### Implicit Context Problem: Relying on knowledge not captured in artifacts. Solution: If you reference something repeatedly, add it to the appropriate artifact. ### Context Hoarding Problem: One person maintains context without team input. Solution: Review context artifacts in pull requests; make updates collaborative. ### Over-Specification Problem: Context becomes so detailed it's impossible to maintain. Solution: Keep artifacts focused on decisions that affect AI behavior and team alignment. ## Integration with Development Tools ### IDE Integration Configure your IDE to display context files prominently: - Pin conductor/product.md for quick reference - Add tech-stack.md to project notes - Create snippets for common patterns from style guides ### Git Hooks Consider pre-commit hooks that: - Warn when dependencies change without tech-stack.md update - Remind to update product.md when feature branches merge - Validate context artifact syntax ### CI/CD Integration Include context validation in pipelines: - Check tech-stack.md matches actual dependencies - Verify links in context documents resolve - Ensure tracks.md status matches git branch state ## Session Continuity Conductor supports multi-session development through context persistence: ### Starting a New Session 1. Read index.md to orient yourself 2. Check tracks.md for active work 3. Review relevant track's plan.md for current task 4. Verify context artifacts are current ### Ending a Session 1. Update plan.md with current progress 2. Note any blockers or decisions made 3. Commit in-progress work with clear status 4. Update tracks.md if status changed ### Handling Interruptions If interrupted mid-task: 1. Mark task as `[~]` with note about stopping point 2. Commit work-in-progress to feature branch 3. Document any uncommitted decisions in plan.md ## Best Practices 1. **Read context first**: Always read relevant artifacts before starting work 2. **Small updates**: Make incremental context changes, not massive rewrites 3. **Link decisions**: Reference context when making implementation choices 4. **Version context**: Commit context changes alongside code changes 5. **Review context**: Include context artifact reviews in code reviews 6. **Validate regularly**: Run context validation checklist before major work 7. **Communicate changes**: Notify team when context artifacts change significantly 8. **Preserve history**: Use git to track context evolution over time 9. **Question staleness**: If context feels wrong, investigate and update 10. **Keep it actionable**: Every context item should inform a decision or behavior
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

data-storytelling

Transform data into compelling narratives using visualization,

data
⭐1
# Data Storytelling Transform raw data into compelling narratives that drive decisions and inspire action. ## When to Use This Skill - Presenting analytics to executives - Creating quarterly business reviews - Building investor presentations - Writing data-driven reports - Communicating insights to non-technical audiences - Making recommendations based on data ## Core Concepts ### 1. Story Structure ``` Setup β†’ Conflict β†’ Resolution Setup: Context and baseline Conflict: The problem or opportunity Resolution: Insights and recommendations ``` ### 2. Narrative Arc ``` 1. Hook: Grab attention with surprising insight 2. Context: Establish the baseline 3. Rising Action: Build through data points 4. Climax: The key insight 5. Resolution: Recommendations 6. Call to Action: Next steps ``` ### 3. Three Pillars | Pillar | Purpose | Components | | ------------- | -------- | -------------------------------- | | **Data** | Evidence | Numbers, trends, comparisons | | **Narrative** | Meaning | Context, causation, implications | | **Visuals** | Clarity | Charts, diagrams, highlights | ## Story Frameworks ### Framework 1: The Problem-Solution Story ```markdown # Customer Churn Analysis ## The Hook "We're losing $2.4M annually to preventable churn." ## The Context - Current churn rate: 8.5% (industry average: 5%) - Average customer lifetime value: $4,800 - 500 customers churned last quarter ## The Problem Analysis of churned customers reveals a pattern: - 73% churned within first 90 days - Common factor: < 3 support interactions - Low feature adoption in first month ## The Insight [Show engagement curve visualization] Customers who don't engage in the first 14 days are 4x more likely to churn. ## The Solution 1. Implement 14-day onboarding sequence 2. Proactive outreach at day 7 3. Feature adoption tracking ## Expected Impact - Reduce early churn by 40% - Save $960K annually - Payback period: 3 months ## Call to Action Approve $50K budget for onboarding automation. ``` ### Framework 2: The Trend Story ```markdown # Q4 Performance Analysis ## Where We Started Q3 ended with $1.2M MRR, 15% below target. Team morale was low after missed goals. ## What Changed [Timeline visualization] - Oct: Launched self-serve pricing - Nov: Reduced friction in signup - Dec: Added customer success calls ## The Transformation [Before/after comparison chart] | Metric | Q3 | Q4 | Change | |----------------|--------|--------|--------| | Trial β†’ Paid | 8% | 15% | +87% | | Time to Value | 14 days| 5 days | -64% | | Expansion Rate | 2% | 8% | +300% | ## Key Insight Self-serve + high-touch creates compound growth. Customers who self-serve AND get a success call have 3x higher expansion rate. ## Going Forward Double down on hybrid model. Target: $1.8M MRR by Q2. ``` ### Framework 3: The Comparison Story ```markdown # Market Opportunity Analysis ## The Question Should we expand into EMEA or APAC first? ## The Comparison [Side-by-side market analysis] ### EMEA - Market size: $4.2B - Growth rate: 8% - Competition: High - Regulatory: Complex (GDPR) - Language: Multiple ### APAC - Market size: $3.8B - Growth rate: 15% - Competition: Moderate - Regulatory: Varied - Language: Multiple ## The Analysis [Weighted scoring matrix visualization] | Factor | Weight | EMEA Score | APAC Score | | ----------- | ------ | ---------- | ---------- | | Market Size | 25% | 5 | 4 | | Growth | 30% | 3 | 5 | | Competition | 20% | 2 | 4 | | Ease | 25% | 2 | 3 | | **Total** | | **2.9** | **4.1** | ## The Recommendation APAC first. Higher growth, less competition. Start with Singapore hub (English, business-friendly). Enter EMEA in Year 2 with localization ready. ## Risk Mitigation - Timezone coverage: Hire 24/7 support - Cultural fit: Local partnerships - Payment: Multi-currency from day 1 ``` ## Visualization Techniques ### Technique 1: Progressive Reveal ```markdown Start simple, add layers: Slide 1: "Revenue is growing" [single line chart] Slide 2: "But growth is slowing" [add growth rate overlay] Slide 3: "Driven by one segment" [add segment breakdown] Slide 4: "Which is saturating" [add market share] Slide 5: "We need new segments" [add opportunity zones] ``` ### Technique 2: Contrast and Compare ```markdown Before/After: β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ BEFORE β”‚ AFTER β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ Process: 5 daysβ”‚ Process: 1 day β”‚ β”‚ Errors: 15% β”‚ Errors: 2% β”‚ β”‚ Cost: $50/unit β”‚ Cost: $20/unit β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ This/That (emphasize difference): β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ CUSTOMER A vs B β”‚ β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆ β”‚ β”‚ β–ˆβ–ˆ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ $45,000 β”‚ β”‚ $8,000 β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ LTV β”‚ β”‚ LTV β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚ β”‚ Onboarded No onboarding β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ ``` ### Technique 3: Annotation and Highlight ```python import matplotlib.pyplot as plt import pandas as pd fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(12, 6)) # Plot the main data ax.plot(dates, revenue, linewidth=2, color='#2E86AB') # Add annotation for key events ax.annotate( 'Product Launch\n+32% spike', xy=(launch_date, launch_revenue), xytext=(launch_date, launch_revenue * 1.2), fontsize=10, arrowprops=dict(arrowstyle='->', color='#E63946'), color='#E63946' ) # Highlight a region ax.axvspan(growth_start, growth_end, alpha=0.2, color='green', label='Growth Period') # Add threshold line ax.axhline(y=target, color='gray', linestyle='--', label=f'Target: ${target:,.0f}') ax.set_title('Revenue Growth Story', fontsize=14, fontweight='bold') ax.legend() ``` ## Presentation Templates ### Template 1: Executive Summary Slide ``` β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ KEY INSIGHT β”‚ β”‚ ══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════│ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ "Customers who complete onboarding in week 1 β”‚ β”‚ have 3x higher lifetime value" β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ THE DATA β”‚ THE IMPLICATION β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ Week 1 completers: β”‚ βœ“ Prioritize onboarding UX β”‚ β”‚ β€’ LTV: $4,500 β”‚ βœ“ Add day-1 success milestones β”‚ β”‚ β€’ Retention: 85% β”‚ βœ“ Proactive week-1 outreach β”‚ β”‚ β€’ NPS: 72 β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ Investment: $75K β”‚ β”‚ Others: β”‚ Expected ROI: 8x β”‚ β”‚ β€’ LTV: $1,500 β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β€’ Retention: 45% β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β€’ NPS: 34 β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ ``` ### Template 2: Data Story Flow ``` Slide 1: THE HEADLINE "We can grow 40% faster by fixing onboarding" Slide 2: THE CONTEXT Current state metrics Industry benchmarks Gap analysis Slide 3: THE DISCOVERY What the data revealed Surprising finding Pattern identification Slide 4: THE DEEP DIVE Root cause analysis Segment breakdowns Statistical significance Slide 5: THE RECOMMENDATION Proposed actions Resource requirements Timeline Slide 6: THE IMPACT Expected outcomes ROI calculation Risk assessment Slide 7: THE ASK Specific request Decision needed Next steps ``` ### Template 3: One-Page Dashboard Story ```markdown # Monthly Business Review: January 2024 ## THE HEADLINE Revenue up 15% but CAC increasing faster than LTV ## KEY METRICS AT A GLANCE β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ MRR β”‚ NRR β”‚ CAC β”‚ LTV β”‚ β”‚ $125K β”‚ 108% β”‚ $450 β”‚ $2,200 β”‚ β”‚ β–²15% β”‚ β–²3% β”‚ β–²22% β”‚ β–²8% β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ ## WHAT'S WORKING βœ“ Enterprise segment growing 25% MoM βœ“ Referral program driving 30% of new logos βœ“ Support satisfaction at all-time high (94%) ## WHAT NEEDS ATTENTION βœ— SMB acquisition cost up 40% βœ— Trial conversion down 5 points βœ— Time-to-value increased by 3 days ## ROOT CAUSE [Mini chart showing SMB vs Enterprise CAC trend] SMB paid ads becoming less efficient. CPC up 35% while conversion flat. ## RECOMMENDATION 1. Shift $20K/mo from paid to content 2. Launch SMB self-serve trial 3. A/B test shorter onboarding ## NEXT MONTH'S FOCUS - Launch content marketing pilot - Complete self-serve MVP - Reduce time-to-value to < 7 days ``` ## Writing Techniques ### Headlines That Work ```markdown BAD: "Q4 Sales Analysis" GOOD: "Q4 Sales Beat Target by 23% - Here's Why" BAD: "Customer Churn Report" GOOD: "We're Losing $2.4M to Preventable Churn" BAD: "Marketing Performance" GOOD: "Content Marketing Delivers 4x ROI vs. Paid" Formula: [Specific Number] + [Business Impact] + [Actionable Context] ``` ### Transition Phrases ```markdown Building the narrative: β€’ "This leads us to ask..." β€’ "When we dig deeper..." β€’ "The pattern becomes clear when..." β€’ "Contrast this with..." Introducing insights: β€’ "The data reveals..." β€’ "What surprised us was..." β€’ "The inflection point came when..." β€’ "The key finding is..." Moving to action: β€’ "This insight suggests..." β€’ "Based on this analysis..." β€’ "The implication is clear..." β€’ "Our recommendation is..." ``` ### Handling Uncertainty ```markdown Acknowledge limitations: β€’ "With 95% confidence, we can say..." β€’ "The sample size of 500 shows..." β€’ "While correlation is strong, causation requires..." β€’ "This trend holds for [segment], though [caveat]..." Present ranges: β€’ "Impact estimate: $400K-$600K" β€’ "Confidence interval: 15-20% improvement" β€’ "Best case: X, Conservative: Y" ``` ## Best Practices ### Do's - **Start with the "so what"** - Lead with insight - **Use the rule of three** - Three points, three comparisons - **Show, don't tell** - Let data speak - **Make it personal** - Connect to audience goals - **End with action** - Clear next steps ### Don'ts - **Don't data dump** - Curate ruthlessly - **Don't bury the insight** - Front-load key findings - **Don't use jargon** - Match audience vocabulary - **Don't show methodology first** - Context, then method - **Don't forget the narrative** - Numbers need meaning ## Resources - [Storytelling with Data (Cole Nussbaumer)](https://www.storytellingwithdata.com/) - [The Pyramid Principle (Barbara Minto)](https://www.amazon.com/Pyramid-Principle-Logic-Writing-Thinking/dp/0273710516) - [Resonate (Nancy Duarte)](https://www.duarte.com/resonate/)
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

track-management

Use this skill when creating, managing, or working with Conductor

coding
⭐1
# Track Management Guide for creating, managing, and completing Conductor tracks - the logical work units that organize features, bugs, and refactors through specification, planning, and implementation phases. ## When to Use This Skill - Creating new feature, bug, or refactor tracks - Writing or reviewing spec.md files - Creating or updating plan.md files - Managing track lifecycle from creation to completion - Understanding track status markers and conventions - Working with the tracks.md registry - Interpreting or updating track metadata ## Track Concept A track is a logical work unit that encapsulates a complete piece of work. Each track has: - A unique identifier - A specification defining requirements - A phased plan breaking work into tasks - Metadata tracking status and progress Tracks provide semantic organization for work, enabling: - Clear scope boundaries - Progress tracking - Git-aware operations (revert by track) - Team coordination ## Track Types ### feature New functionality or capabilities. Use for: - New user-facing features - New API endpoints - New integrations - Significant enhancements ### bug Defect fixes. Use for: - Incorrect behavior - Error conditions - Performance regressions - Security vulnerabilities ### chore Maintenance and housekeeping. Use for: - Dependency updates - Configuration changes - Documentation updates - Cleanup tasks ### refactor Code improvement without behavior change. Use for: - Code restructuring - Pattern adoption - Technical debt reduction - Performance optimization (same behavior, better performance) ## Track ID Format Track IDs follow the pattern: `{shortname}_{YYYYMMDD}` - **shortname**: 2-4 word kebab-case description (e.g., `user-auth`, `api-rate-limit`) - **YYYYMMDD**: Creation date in ISO format Examples: - `user-auth_20250115` - `fix-login-error_20250115` - `upgrade-deps_20250115` - `refactor-api-client_20250115` ## Track Lifecycle ### 1. Creation (newTrack) **Define Requirements** 1. Gather requirements through interactive Q&A 2. Identify acceptance criteria 3. Determine scope boundaries 4. Identify dependencies **Generate Specification** 1. Create `spec.md` with structured requirements 2. Document functional and non-functional requirements 3. Define acceptance criteria 4. List dependencies and constraints **Generate Plan** 1. Create `plan.md` with phased task breakdown 2. Organize tasks into logical phases 3. Add verification tasks after phases 4. Estimate effort and complexity **Register Track** 1. Add entry to `tracks.md` registry 2. Create track directory structure 3. Generate `metadata.json` 4. Create track `index.md` ### 2. Implementation **Execute Tasks** 1. Select next pending task from plan 2. Mark task as in-progress 3. Implement following workflow (TDD) 4. Mark task complete with commit SHA **Update Status** 1. Update task markers in plan.md 2. Record commit SHAs for traceability 3. Update phase progress 4. Update track status in tracks.md **Verify Progress** 1. Complete verification tasks 2. Wait for checkpoint approval 3. Record checkpoint commits ### 3. Completion **Sync Documentation** 1. Update product.md if features added 2. Update tech-stack.md if dependencies changed 3. Verify all acceptance criteria met **Archive or Delete** 1. Mark track as completed in tracks.md 2. Record completion date 3. Archive or retain track directory ## Specification (spec.md) Structure ```markdown # {Track Title} ## Overview Brief description of what this track accomplishes and why. ## Functional Requirements ### FR-1: {Requirement Name} Description of the functional requirement. - Acceptance: How to verify this requirement is met ### FR-2: {Requirement Name} ... ## Non-Functional Requirements ### NFR-1: {Requirement Name} Description of the non-functional requirement (performance, security, etc.) - Target: Specific measurable target - Verification: How to test ## Acceptance Criteria - [ ] Criterion 1: Specific, testable condition - [ ] Criterion 2: Specific, testable condition - [ ] Criterion 3: Specific, testable condition ## Scope ### In Scope - Explicitly included items - Features to implement - Components to modify ### Out of Scope - Explicitly excluded items - Future considerations - Related but separate work ## Dependencies ### Internal - Other tracks or components this depends on - Required context artifacts ### External - Third-party services or APIs - External dependencies ## Risks and Mitigations | Risk | Impact | Mitigation | | ---------------- | --------------- | ------------------- | | Risk description | High/Medium/Low | Mitigation strategy | ## Open Questions - [ ] Question that needs resolution - [x] Resolved question - Answer ``` ## Plan (plan.md) Structure ```markdown # Implementation Plan: {Track Title} Track ID: `{track-id}` Created: YYYY-MM-DD Status: pending | in-progress | completed ## Overview Brief description of implementation approach. ## Phase 1: {Phase Name} ### Tasks - [ ] **Task 1.1**: Task description - Sub-task or detail - Sub-task or detail - [ ] **Task 1.2**: Task description - [ ] **Task 1.3**: Task description ### Verification - [ ] **Verify 1.1**: Verification step for phase ## Phase 2: {Phase Name} ### Tasks - [ ] **Task 2.1**: Task description - [ ] **Task 2.2**: Task description ### Verification - [ ] **Verify 2.1**: Verification step for phase ## Phase 3: Finalization ### Tasks - [ ] **Task 3.1**: Update documentation - [ ] **Task 3.2**: Final integration test ### Verification - [ ] **Verify 3.1**: All acceptance criteria met ## Checkpoints | Phase | Checkpoint SHA | Date | Status | | ------- | -------------- | ---- | ------- | | Phase 1 | | | pending | | Phase 2 | | | pending | | Phase 3 | | | pending | ``` ## Status Marker Conventions Use consistent markers in plan.md: | Marker | Meaning | Usage | | ------ | ----------- | --------------------------- | | `[ ]` | Pending | Task not started | | `[~]` | In Progress | Currently being worked | | `[x]` | Complete | Task finished (include SHA) | | `[-]` | Skipped | Intentionally not done | | `[!]` | Blocked | Waiting on dependency | Example: ```markdown - [x] **Task 1.1**: Set up database schema `abc1234` - [~] **Task 1.2**: Implement user model - [ ] **Task 1.3**: Add validation logic - [!] **Task 1.4**: Integrate auth service (blocked: waiting for API key) - [-] **Task 1.5**: Legacy migration (skipped: not needed) ``` ## Track Registry (tracks.md) Format ```markdown # Track Registry ## Active Tracks | Track ID | Type | Status | Phase | Started | Assignee | | ------------------------------------------------ | ------- | ----------- | ----- | ---------- | ---------- | | [user-auth_20250115](tracks/user-auth_20250115/) | feature | in-progress | 2/3 | 2025-01-15 | @developer | | [fix-login_20250114](tracks/fix-login_20250114/) | bug | pending | 0/2 | 2025-01-14 | - | ## Completed Tracks | Track ID | Type | Completed | Duration | | ---------------------------------------------- | ----- | ---------- | -------- | | [setup-ci_20250110](tracks/setup-ci_20250110/) | chore | 2025-01-12 | 2 days | ## Archived Tracks | Track ID | Reason | Archived | | ---------------------------------------------------- | ---------- | ---------- | | [old-feature_20241201](tracks/old-feature_20241201/) | Superseded | 2025-01-05 | ``` ## Metadata (metadata.json) Fields ```json { "id": "user-auth_20250115", "title": "User Authentication System", "type": "feature", "status": "in-progress", "priority": "high", "created": "2025-01-15T10:30:00Z", "updated": "2025-01-15T14:45:00Z", "started": "2025-01-15T11:00:00Z", "completed": null, "assignee": "@developer", "phases": { "total": 3, "current": 2, "completed": 1 }, "tasks": { "total": 12, "completed": 5, "in_progress": 1, "pending": 6 }, "checkpoints": [ { "phase": 1, "sha": "abc1234", "date": "2025-01-15T13:00:00Z" } ], "dependencies": [], "tags": ["auth", "security"] } ``` ## Track Operations ### Creating a Track 1. Run `/conductor:new-track` 2. Answer interactive questions 3. Review generated spec.md 4. Review generated plan.md 5. Confirm track creation ### Starting Implementation 1. Read spec.md and plan.md 2. Verify context artifacts are current 3. Mark first task as `[~]` 4. Begin TDD workflow ### Completing a Phase 1. Ensure all phase tasks are `[x]` 2. Complete verification tasks 3. Wait for checkpoint approval 4. Record checkpoint SHA 5. Proceed to next phase ### Completing a Track 1. Verify all phases complete 2. Verify all acceptance criteria met 3. Update product.md if needed 4. Mark track completed in tracks.md 5. Update metadata.json ### Reverting a Track 1. Run `/conductor:revert` 2. Select track to revert 3. Choose granularity (track/phase/task) 4. Confirm revert operation 5. Update status markers ## Handling Track Dependencies ### Identifying Dependencies During track creation, identify: - **Hard dependencies**: Must complete before this track can start - **Soft dependencies**: Can proceed in parallel but may affect integration - **External dependencies**: Third-party services, APIs, or team decisions ### Documenting Dependencies In spec.md, list dependencies with: - Dependency type (hard/soft/external) - Current status (available/pending/blocked) - Resolution path (what needs to happen) ### Managing Blocked Tracks When a track is blocked: 1. Mark blocked tasks with `[!]` and reason 2. Update tracks.md status 3. Document blocker in metadata.json 4. Consider creating dependency track if needed ## Track Sizing Guidelines ### Right-Sized Tracks Aim for tracks that: - Complete in 1-5 days of work - Have 2-4 phases - Contain 8-20 tasks total - Deliver a coherent, testable unit ### Too Large Signs a track is too large: - More than 5 phases - More than 25 tasks - Multiple unrelated features - Estimated duration > 1 week Solution: Split into multiple tracks with clear boundaries. ### Too Small Signs a track is too small: - Single phase with 1-2 tasks - No meaningful verification needed - Could be a sub-task of another track - Less than a few hours of work Solution: Combine with related work or handle as part of existing track. ## Specification Quality Checklist Before finalizing spec.md, verify: ### Requirements Quality - [ ] Each requirement has clear acceptance criteria - [ ] Requirements are testable - [ ] Requirements are independent (can verify separately) - [ ] No ambiguous language ("should be fast" β†’ "response < 200ms") ### Scope Clarity - [ ] In-scope items are specific - [ ] Out-of-scope items prevent scope creep - [ ] Boundaries are clear to implementer ### Dependencies Identified - [ ] All internal dependencies listed - [ ] External dependencies have owners/contacts - [ ] Dependency status is current ### Risks Addressed - [ ] Major risks identified - [ ] Impact assessment realistic - [ ] Mitigations are actionable ## Plan Quality Checklist Before starting implementation, verify plan.md: ### Task Quality - [ ] Tasks are atomic (one logical action) - [ ] Tasks are independently verifiable - [ ] Task descriptions are clear - [ ] Sub-tasks provide helpful detail ### Phase Organization - [ ] Phases group related tasks - [ ] Each phase delivers something testable - [ ] Verification tasks after each phase - [ ] Phases build on each other logically ### Completeness - [ ] All spec requirements have corresponding tasks - [ ] Documentation tasks included - [ ] Testing tasks included - [ ] Integration tasks included ## Common Track Patterns ### Feature Track Pattern ``` Phase 1: Foundation - Data models - Database migrations - Basic API structure Phase 2: Core Logic - Business logic implementation - Input validation - Error handling Phase 3: Integration - UI integration - API documentation - End-to-end tests ``` ### Bug Fix Track Pattern ``` Phase 1: Reproduction - Write failing test capturing bug - Document reproduction steps Phase 2: Fix - Implement fix - Verify test passes - Check for regressions Phase 3: Verification - Manual verification - Update documentation if needed ``` ### Refactor Track Pattern ``` Phase 1: Preparation - Add characterization tests - Document current behavior Phase 2: Refactoring - Apply changes incrementally - Maintain green tests throughout Phase 3: Cleanup - Remove dead code - Update documentation ``` ## Best Practices 1. **One track, one concern**: Keep tracks focused on a single logical change 2. **Small phases**: Break work into phases of 3-5 tasks maximum 3. **Verification after phases**: Always include verification tasks 4. **Update markers immediately**: Mark task status as you work 5. **Record SHAs**: Always note commit SHAs for completed tasks 6. **Review specs before planning**: Ensure spec is complete before creating plan 7. **Link dependencies**: Explicitly note track dependencies 8. **Archive, don't delete**: Preserve completed tracks for reference 9. **Size appropriately**: Keep tracks between 1-5 days of work 10. **Clear acceptance criteria**: Every requirement must be testable
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

workflow-patterns

Use this skill when implementing tasks according to Conductor's TDD

coding
⭐1
# Workflow Patterns Guide for implementing tasks using Conductor's TDD workflow, managing phase checkpoints, handling git commits, and executing the verification protocol that ensures quality throughout implementation. ## When to Use This Skill - Implementing tasks from a track's plan.md - Following TDD red-green-refactor cycle - Completing phase checkpoints - Managing git commits and notes - Understanding quality assurance gates - Handling verification protocols - Recording progress in plan files ## TDD Task Lifecycle Follow these 11 steps for each task: ### Step 1: Select Next Task Read plan.md and identify the next pending `[ ]` task. Select tasks in order within the current phase. Do not skip ahead to later phases. ### Step 2: Mark as In Progress Update plan.md to mark the task as `[~]`: ```markdown - [~] **Task 2.1**: Implement user validation ``` Commit this status change separately from implementation. ### Step 3: RED - Write Failing Tests Write tests that define the expected behavior before writing implementation: - Create test file if needed - Write test cases covering happy path - Write test cases covering edge cases - Write test cases covering error conditions - Run tests - they should FAIL Example: ```python def test_validate_user_email_valid(): user = User(email="test@example.com") assert user.validate_email() is True def test_validate_user_email_invalid(): user = User(email="invalid") assert user.validate_email() is False ``` ### Step 4: GREEN - Implement Minimum Code Write the minimum code necessary to make tests pass: - Focus on making tests green, not perfection - Avoid premature optimization - Keep implementation simple - Run tests - they should PASS ### Step 5: REFACTOR - Improve Clarity With green tests, improve the code: - Extract common patterns - Improve naming - Remove duplication - Simplify logic - Run tests after each change - they should remain GREEN ### Step 6: Verify Coverage Check test coverage meets the 80% target: ```bash pytest --cov=module --cov-report=term-missing ``` If coverage is below 80%: - Identify uncovered lines - Add tests for missing paths - Re-run coverage check ### Step 7: Document Deviations If implementation deviated from plan or introduced new dependencies: - Update tech-stack.md with new dependencies - Note deviations in plan.md task comments - Update spec.md if requirements changed ### Step 8: Commit Implementation Create a focused commit for the task: ```bash git add -A git commit -m "feat(user): implement email validation - Add validate_email method to User class - Handle empty and malformed emails - Add comprehensive test coverage Task: 2.1 Track: user-auth_20250115" ``` Commit message format: - Type: feat, fix, refactor, test, docs, chore - Scope: affected module or component - Summary: imperative, present tense - Body: bullet points of changes - Footer: task and track references ### Step 9: Attach Git Notes Add rich task summary as git note: ```bash git notes add -m "Task 2.1: Implement user validation Summary: - Added email validation using regex pattern - Handles edge cases: empty, no @, no domain - Coverage: 94% on validation module Files changed: - src/models/user.py (modified) - tests/test_user.py (modified) Decisions: - Used simple regex over email-validator library - Reason: No external dependency for basic validation" ``` ### Step 10: Update Plan with SHA Update plan.md to mark task complete with commit SHA: ```markdown - [x] **Task 2.1**: Implement user validation `abc1234` ``` ### Step 11: Commit Plan Update Commit the plan status update: ```bash git add conductor/tracks/*/plan.md git commit -m "docs: update plan - task 2.1 complete Track: user-auth_20250115" ``` ## Phase Completion Protocol When all tasks in a phase are complete, execute the verification protocol: ### Identify Changed Files List all files modified since the last checkpoint: ```bash git diff --name-only <last-checkpoint-sha>..HEAD ``` ### Ensure Test Coverage For each modified file: 1. Identify corresponding test file 2. Verify tests exist for new/changed code 3. Run coverage for modified modules 4. Add tests if coverage < 80% ### Run Full Test Suite Execute complete test suite: ```bash pytest -v --tb=short ``` All tests must pass before proceeding. ### Generate Manual Verification Steps Create checklist of manual verifications: ```markdown ## Phase 1 Verification Checklist - [ ] User can register with valid email - [ ] Invalid email shows appropriate error - [ ] Database stores user correctly - [ ] API returns expected response codes ``` ### WAIT for User Approval Present verification checklist to user: ``` Phase 1 complete. Please verify: 1. [ ] Test suite passes (automated) 2. [ ] Coverage meets target (automated) 3. [ ] Manual verification items (requires human) Respond with 'approved' to continue, or note issues. ``` Do NOT proceed without explicit approval. ### Create Checkpoint Commit After approval, create checkpoint commit: ```bash git add -A git commit -m "checkpoint: phase 1 complete - user-auth_20250115 Verified: - All tests passing - Coverage: 87% - Manual verification approved Phase 1 tasks: - [x] Task 1.1: Setup database schema - [x] Task 1.2: Implement user model - [x] Task 1.3: Add validation logic" ``` ### Record Checkpoint SHA Update plan.md checkpoints table: ```markdown ## Checkpoints | Phase | Checkpoint SHA | Date | Status | | ------- | -------------- | ---------- | -------- | | Phase 1 | def5678 | 2025-01-15 | verified | | Phase 2 | | | pending | ``` ## Quality Assurance Gates Before marking any task complete, verify these gates: ### Passing Tests - All existing tests pass - New tests pass - No test regressions ### Coverage >= 80% - New code has 80%+ coverage - Overall project coverage maintained - Critical paths fully covered ### Style Compliance - Code follows style guides - Linting passes - Formatting correct ### Documentation - Public APIs documented - Complex logic explained - README updated if needed ### Type Safety - Type hints present (if applicable) - Type checker passes - No type: ignore without reason ### No Linting Errors - Zero linter errors - Warnings addressed or justified - Static analysis clean ### Mobile Compatibility If applicable: - Responsive design verified - Touch interactions work - Performance acceptable ### Security Audit - No secrets in code - Input validation present - Authentication/authorization correct - Dependencies vulnerability-free ## Git Integration ### Commit Message Format ``` <type>(<scope>): <subject> <body> <footer> ``` Types: - `feat`: New feature - `fix`: Bug fix - `refactor`: Code change without feature/fix - `test`: Adding tests - `docs`: Documentation - `chore`: Maintenance ### Git Notes for Rich Summaries Attach detailed notes to commits: ```bash git notes add -m "<detailed summary>" ``` View notes: ```bash git log --show-notes ``` Benefits: - Preserves context without cluttering commit message - Enables semantic queries across commits - Supports track-based operations ### SHA Recording in plan.md Always record the commit SHA when completing tasks: ```markdown - [x] **Task 1.1**: Setup schema `abc1234` - [x] **Task 1.2**: Add model `def5678` ``` This enables: - Traceability from plan to code - Semantic revert operations - Progress auditing ## Verification Checkpoints ### Why Checkpoints Matter Checkpoints create restore points for semantic reversion: - Revert to end of any phase - Maintain logical code state - Enable safe experimentation ### When to Create Checkpoints Create checkpoint after: - All phase tasks complete - All phase verifications pass - User approval received ### Checkpoint Commit Content Include in checkpoint commit: - All uncommitted changes - Updated plan.md - Updated metadata.json - Any documentation updates ### How to Use Checkpoints For reverting: ```bash # Revert to end of Phase 1 git revert --no-commit <phase-2-commits>... git commit -m "revert: rollback to phase 1 checkpoint" ``` For review: ```bash # See what changed in Phase 2 git diff <phase-1-sha>..<phase-2-sha> ``` ## Handling Deviations During implementation, deviations from the plan may occur. Handle them systematically: ### Types of Deviations **Scope Addition** Discovered requirement not in original spec. - Document in spec.md as new requirement - Add tasks to plan.md - Note addition in task comments **Scope Reduction** Feature deemed unnecessary during implementation. - Mark tasks as `[-]` (skipped) with reason - Update spec.md scope section - Document decision rationale **Technical Deviation** Different implementation approach than planned. - Note deviation in task completion comment - Update tech-stack.md if dependencies changed - Document why original approach was unsuitable **Requirement Change** Understanding of requirement changes during work. - Update spec.md with corrected requirement - Adjust plan.md tasks if needed - Re-verify acceptance criteria ### Deviation Documentation Format When completing a task with deviation: ```markdown - [x] **Task 2.1**: Implement validation `abc1234` - DEVIATION: Used library instead of custom code - Reason: Better edge case handling - Impact: Added email-validator to dependencies ``` ## Error Recovery ### Failed Tests After GREEN If tests fail after reaching GREEN: 1. Do NOT proceed to REFACTOR 2. Identify which test started failing 3. Check if refactoring broke something 4. Revert to last known GREEN state 5. Re-approach the implementation ### Checkpoint Rejection If user rejects a checkpoint: 1. Note rejection reason in plan.md 2. Create tasks to address issues 3. Complete remediation tasks 4. Request checkpoint approval again ### Blocked by Dependency If task cannot proceed: 1. Mark task as `[!]` with blocker description 2. Check if other tasks can proceed 3. Document expected resolution timeline 4. Consider creating dependency resolution track ## TDD Variations by Task Type ### Data Model Tasks ``` RED: Write test for model creation and validation GREEN: Implement model class with fields REFACTOR: Add computed properties, improve types ``` ### API Endpoint Tasks ``` RED: Write test for request/response contract GREEN: Implement endpoint handler REFACTOR: Extract validation, improve error handling ``` ### Integration Tasks ``` RED: Write test for component interaction GREEN: Wire components together REFACTOR: Improve error propagation, add logging ``` ### Refactoring Tasks ``` RED: Add characterization tests for current behavior GREEN: Apply refactoring (tests should stay green) REFACTOR: Clean up any introduced complexity ``` ## Working with Existing Tests When modifying code with existing tests: ### Extend, Don't Replace - Keep existing tests passing - Add new tests for new behavior - Update tests only when requirements change ### Test Migration When refactoring changes test structure: 1. Run existing tests (should pass) 2. Add new tests for refactored code 3. Migrate test cases to new structure 4. Remove old tests only after new tests pass ### Regression Prevention After any change: 1. Run full test suite 2. Check for unexpected failures 3. Investigate any new failures 4. Fix regressions before proceeding ## Checkpoint Verification Details ### Automated Verification Run before requesting approval: ```bash # Test suite pytest -v --tb=short # Coverage pytest --cov=src --cov-report=term-missing # Linting ruff check src/ tests/ # Type checking (if applicable) mypy src/ ``` ### Manual Verification Guidance For manual items, provide specific instructions: ```markdown ## Manual Verification Steps ### User Registration 1. Navigate to /register 2. Enter valid email: test@example.com 3. Enter password meeting requirements 4. Click Submit 5. Verify success message appears 6. Verify user appears in database ### Error Handling 1. Enter invalid email: "notanemail" 2. Verify error message shows 3. Verify form retains other entered data ``` ## Performance Considerations ### Test Suite Performance Keep test suite fast: - Use fixtures to avoid redundant setup - Mock slow external calls - Run subset during development, full suite at checkpoints ### Commit Performance Keep commits atomic: - One logical change per commit - Complete thought, not work-in-progress - Tests should pass after every commit ## Best Practices 1. **Never skip RED**: Always write failing tests first 2. **Small commits**: One logical change per commit 3. **Immediate updates**: Update plan.md right after task completion 4. **Wait for approval**: Never skip checkpoint verification 5. **Rich git notes**: Include context that helps future understanding 6. **Coverage discipline**: Don't accept coverage below target 7. **Quality gates**: Check all gates before marking complete 8. **Sequential phases**: Complete phases in order 9. **Document deviations**: Note any changes from original plan 10. **Clean state**: Each commit should leave code in working state 11. **Fast feedback**: Run relevant tests frequently during development 12. **Clear blockers**: Address blockers promptly, don't work around them
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

auth-implementation-patterns

Master authentication and authorization patterns including JWT,

coding
⭐1
# Authentication & Authorization Implementation Patterns Build secure, scalable authentication and authorization systems using industry-standard patterns and modern best practices. ## When to Use This Skill - Implementing user authentication systems - Securing REST or GraphQL APIs - Adding OAuth2/social login - Implementing role-based access control (RBAC) - Designing session management - Migrating authentication systems - Debugging auth issues - Implementing SSO or multi-tenancy ## Core Concepts ### 1. Authentication vs Authorization **Authentication (AuthN)**: Who are you? - Verifying identity (username/password, OAuth, biometrics) - Issuing credentials (sessions, tokens) - Managing login/logout **Authorization (AuthZ)**: What can you do? - Permission checking - Role-based access control (RBAC) - Resource ownership validation - Policy enforcement ### 2. Authentication Strategies **Session-Based:** - Server stores session state - Session ID in cookie - Traditional, simple, stateful **Token-Based (JWT):** - Stateless, self-contained - Scales horizontally - Can store claims **OAuth2/OpenID Connect:** - Delegate authentication - Social login (Google, GitHub) - Enterprise SSO ## JWT Authentication ### Pattern 1: JWT Implementation ```typescript // JWT structure: header.payload.signature import jwt from "jsonwebtoken"; import { Request, Response, NextFunction } from "express"; interface JWTPayload { userId: string; email: string; role: string; iat: number; exp: number; } // Generate JWT function generateTokens(userId: string, email: string, role: string) { const accessToken = jwt.sign( { userId, email, role }, process.env.JWT_SECRET!, { expiresIn: "15m" }, // Short-lived ); const refreshToken = jwt.sign( { userId }, process.env.JWT_REFRESH_SECRET!, { expiresIn: "7d" }, // Long-lived ); return { accessToken, refreshToken }; } // Verify JWT function verifyToken(token: string): JWTPayload { try { return jwt.verify(token, process.env.JWT_SECRET!) as JWTPayload; } catch (error) { if (error instanceof jwt.TokenExpiredError) { throw new Error("Token expired"); } if (error instanceof jwt.JsonWebTokenError) { throw new Error("Invalid token"); } throw error; } } // Middleware function authenticate(req: Request, res: Response, next: NextFunction) { const authHeader = req.headers.authorization; if (!authHeader?.startsWith("Bearer ")) { return res.status(401).json({ error: "No token provided" }); } const token = authHeader.substring(7); try { const payload = verifyToken(token); req.user = payload; // Attach user to request next(); } catch (error) { return res.status(401).json({ error: "Invalid token" }); } } // Usage app.get("/api/profile", authenticate, (req, res) => { res.json({ user: req.user }); }); ``` ### Pattern 2: Refresh Token Flow ```typescript interface StoredRefreshToken { token: string; userId: string; expiresAt: Date; createdAt: Date; } class RefreshTokenService { // Store refresh token in database async storeRefreshToken(userId: string, refreshToken: string) { const expiresAt = new Date(Date.now() + 7 * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000); await db.refreshTokens.create({ token: await hash(refreshToken), // Hash before storing userId, expiresAt, }); } // Refresh access token async refreshAccessToken(refreshToken: string) { // Verify refresh token let payload; try { payload = jwt.verify(refreshToken, process.env.JWT_REFRESH_SECRET!) as { userId: string; }; } catch { throw new Error("Invalid refresh token"); } // Check if token exists in database const storedToken = await db.refreshTokens.findOne({ where: { token: await hash(refreshToken), userId: payload.userId, expiresAt: { $gt: new Date() }, }, }); if (!storedToken) { throw new Error("Refresh token not found or expired"); } // Get user const user = await db.users.findById(payload.userId); if (!user) { throw new Error("User not found"); } // Generate new access token const accessToken = jwt.sign( { userId: user.id, email: user.email, role: user.role }, process.env.JWT_SECRET!, { expiresIn: "15m" }, ); return { accessToken }; } // Revoke refresh token (logout) async revokeRefreshToken(refreshToken: string) { await db.refreshTokens.deleteOne({ token: await hash(refreshToken), }); } // Revoke all user tokens (logout all devices) async revokeAllUserTokens(userId: string) { await db.refreshTokens.deleteMany({ userId }); } } // API endpoints app.post("/api/auth/refresh", async (req, res) => { const { refreshToken } = req.body; try { const { accessToken } = await refreshTokenService.refreshAccessToken(refreshToken); res.json({ accessToken }); } catch (error) { res.status(401).json({ error: "Invalid refresh token" }); } }); app.post("/api/auth/logout", authenticate, async (req, res) => { const { refreshToken } = req.body; await refreshTokenService.revokeRefreshToken(refreshToken); res.json({ message: "Logged out successfully" }); }); ``` ## Session-Based Authentication ### Pattern 1: Express Session ```typescript import session from "express-session"; import RedisStore from "connect-redis"; import { createClient } from "redis"; // Setup Redis for session storage const redisClient = createClient({ url: process.env.REDIS_URL, }); await redisClient.connect(); app.use( session({ store: new RedisStore({ client: redisClient }), secret: process.env.SESSION_SECRET!, resave: false, saveUninitialized: false, cookie: { secure: process.env.NODE_ENV === "production", // HTTPS only httpOnly: true, // No JavaScript access maxAge: 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000, // 24 hours sameSite: "strict", // CSRF protection }, }), ); // Login app.post("/api/auth/login", async (req, res) => { const { email, password } = req.body; const user = await db.users.findOne({ email }); if (!user || !(await verifyPassword(password, user.passwordHash))) { return res.status(401).json({ error: "Invalid credentials" }); } // Store user in session req.session.userId = user.id; req.session.role = user.role; res.json({ user: { id: user.id, email: user.email, role: user.role } }); }); // Session middleware function requireAuth(req: Request, res: Response, next: NextFunction) { if (!req.session.userId) { return res.status(401).json({ error: "Not authenticated" }); } next(); } // Protected route app.get("/api/profile", requireAuth, async (req, res) => { const user = await db.users.findById(req.session.userId); res.json({ user }); }); // Logout app.post("/api/auth/logout", (req, res) => { req.session.destroy((err) => { if (err) { return res.status(500).json({ error: "Logout failed" }); } res.clearCookie("connect.sid"); res.json({ message: "Logged out successfully" }); }); }); ``` ## OAuth2 / Social Login ### Pattern 1: OAuth2 with Passport.js ```typescript import passport from "passport"; import { Strategy as GoogleStrategy } from "passport-google-oauth20"; import { Strategy as GitHubStrategy } from "passport-github2"; // Google OAuth passport.use( new GoogleStrategy( { clientID: process.env.GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID!, clientSecret: process.env.GOOGLE_CLIENT_SECRET!, callbackURL: "/api/auth/google/callback", }, async (accessToken, refreshToken, profile, done) => { try { // Find or create user let user = await db.users.findOne({ googleId: profile.id, }); if (!user) { user = await db.users.create({ googleId: profile.id, email: profile.emails?.[0]?.value, name: profile.displayName, avatar: profile.photos?.[0]?.value, }); } return done(null, user); } catch (error) { return done(error, undefined); } }, ), ); // Routes app.get( "/api/auth/google", passport.authenticate("google", { scope: ["profile", "email"], }), ); app.get( "/api/auth/google/callback", passport.authenticate("google", { session: false }), (req, res) => { // Generate JWT const tokens = generateTokens(req.user.id, req.user.email, req.user.role); // Redirect to frontend with token res.redirect( `${process.env.FRONTEND_URL}/auth/callback?token=${tokens.accessToken}`, ); }, ); ``` ## Authorization Patterns ### Pattern 1: Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) ```typescript enum Role { USER = "user", MODERATOR = "moderator", ADMIN = "admin", } const roleHierarchy: Record<Role, Role[]> = { [Role.ADMIN]: [Role.ADMIN, Role.MODERATOR, Role.USER], [Role.MODERATOR]: [Role.MODERATOR, Role.USER], [Role.USER]: [Role.USER], }; function hasRole(userRole: Role, requiredRole: Role): boolean { return roleHierarchy[userRole].includes(requiredRole); } // Middleware function requireRole(...roles: Role[]) { return (req: Request, res: Response, next: NextFunction) => { if (!req.user) { return res.status(401).json({ error: "Not authenticated" }); } if (!roles.some((role) => hasRole(req.user.role, role))) { return res.status(403).json({ error: "Insufficient permissions" }); } next(); }; } // Usage app.delete( "/api/users/:id", authenticate, requireRole(Role.ADMIN), async (req, res) => { // Only admins can delete users await db.users.delete(req.params.id); res.json({ message: "User deleted" }); }, ); ``` ### Pattern 2: Permission-Based Access Control ```typescript enum Permission { READ_USERS = "read:users", WRITE_USERS = "write:users", DELETE_USERS = "delete:users", READ_POSTS = "read:posts", WRITE_POSTS = "write:posts", } const rolePermissions: Record<Role, Permission[]> = { [Role.USER]: [Permission.READ_POSTS, Permission.WRITE_POSTS], [Role.MODERATOR]: [ Permission.READ_POSTS, Permission.WRITE_POSTS, Permission.READ_USERS, ], [Role.ADMIN]: Object.values(Permission), }; function hasPermission(userRole: Role, permission: Permission): boolean { return rolePermissions[userRole]?.includes(permission) ?? false; } function requirePermission(...permissions: Permission[]) { return (req: Request, res: Response, next: NextFunction) => { if (!req.user) { return res.status(401).json({ error: "Not authenticated" }); } const hasAllPermissions = permissions.every((permission) => hasPermission(req.user.role, permission), ); if (!hasAllPermissions) { return res.status(403).json({ error: "Insufficient permissions" }); } next(); }; } // Usage app.get( "/api/users", authenticate, requirePermission(Permission.READ_USERS), async (req, res) => { const users = await db.users.findAll(); res.json({ users }); }, ); ``` ### Pattern 3: Resource Ownership ```typescript // Check if user owns resource async function requireOwnership( resourceType: "post" | "comment", resourceIdParam: string = "id", ) { return async (req: Request, res: Response, next: NextFunction) => { if (!req.user) { return res.status(401).json({ error: "Not authenticated" }); } const resourceId = req.params[resourceIdParam]; // Admins can access anything if (req.user.role === Role.ADMIN) { return next(); } // Check ownership let resource; if (resourceType === "post") { resource = await db.posts.findById(resourceId); } else if (resourceType === "comment") { resource = await db.comments.findById(resourceId); } if (!resource) { return res.status(404).json({ error: "Resource not found" }); } if (resource.userId !== req.user.userId) { return res.status(403).json({ error: "Not authorized" }); } next(); }; } // Usage app.put( "/api/posts/:id", authenticate, requireOwnership("post"), async (req, res) => { // User can only update their own posts const post = await db.posts.update(req.params.id, req.body); res.json({ post }); }, ); ``` ## Security Best Practices ### Pattern 1: Password Security ```typescript import bcrypt from "bcrypt"; import { z } from "zod"; // Password validation schema const passwordSchema = z .string() .min(12, "Password must be at least 12 characters") .regex(/[A-Z]/, "Password must contain uppercase letter") .regex(/[a-z]/, "Password must contain lowercase letter") .regex(/[0-9]/, "Password must contain number") .regex(/[^A-Za-z0-9]/, "Password must contain special character"); // Hash password async function hashPassword(password: string): Promise<string> { const saltRounds = 12; // 2^12 iterations return bcrypt.hash(password, saltRounds); } // Verify password async function verifyPassword( password: string, hash: string, ): Promise<boolean> { return bcrypt.compare(password, hash); } // Registration with password validation app.post("/api/auth/register", async (req, res) => { try { const { email, password } = req.body; // Validate password passwordSchema.parse(password); // Check if user exists const existingUser = await db.users.findOne({ email }); if (existingUser) { return res.status(400).json({ error: "Email already registered" }); } // Hash password const passwordHash = await hashPassword(password); // Create user const user = await db.users.create({ email, passwordHash, }); // Generate tokens const tokens = generateTokens(user.id, user.email, user.role); res.status(201).json({ user: { id: user.id, email: user.email }, ...tokens, }); } catch (error) { if (error instanceof z.ZodError) { return res.status(400).json({ error: error.errors[0].message }); } res.status(500).json({ error: "Registration failed" }); } }); ``` ### Pattern 2: Rate Limiting ```typescript import rateLimit from "express-rate-limit"; import RedisStore from "rate-limit-redis"; // Login rate limiter const loginLimiter = rateLimit({ store: new RedisStore({ client: redisClient }), windowMs: 15 * 60 * 1000, // 15 minutes max: 5, // 5 attempts message: "Too many login attempts, please try again later", standardHeaders: true, legacyHeaders: false, }); // API rate limiter const apiLimiter = rateLimit({ windowMs: 60 * 1000, // 1 minute max: 100, // 100 requests per minute standardHeaders: true, }); // Apply to routes app.post("/api/auth/login", loginLimiter, async (req, res) => { // Login logic }); app.use("/api/", apiLimiter); ``` ## Best Practices 1. **Never Store Plain Passwords**: Always hash with bcrypt/argon2 2. **Use HTTPS**: Encrypt data in transit 3. **Short-Lived Access Tokens**: 15-30 minutes max 4. **Secure Cookies**: httpOnly, secure, sameSite flags 5. **Validate All Input**: Email format, password strength 6. **Rate Limit Auth Endpoints**: Prevent brute force attacks 7. **Implement CSRF Protection**: For session-based auth 8. **Rotate Secrets Regularly**: JWT secrets, session secrets 9. **Log Security Events**: Login attempts, failed auth 10. **Use MFA When Possible**: Extra security layer ## Common Pitfalls - **Weak Passwords**: Enforce strong password policies - **JWT in localStorage**: Vulnerable to XSS, use httpOnly cookies - **No Token Expiration**: Tokens should expire - **Client-Side Auth Checks Only**: Always validate server-side - **Insecure Password Reset**: Use secure tokens with expiration - **No Rate Limiting**: Vulnerable to brute force - **Trusting Client Data**: Always validate on server ## Resources - **references/jwt-best-practices.md**: JWT implementation guide - **references/oauth2-flows.md**: OAuth2 flow diagrams and examples - **references/session-security.md**: Secure session management - **assets/auth-security-checklist.md**: Security review checklist - **assets/password-policy-template.md**: Password requirements template - **scripts/token-validator.ts**: JWT validation utility
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

team-composition-patterns

Design optimal agent team compositions with sizing heuristics,

coding
⭐1
# Team Composition Patterns Best practices for composing multi-agent teams, selecting team sizes, choosing agent types, and configuring display modes for Claude Code's Agent Teams feature. ## When to Use This Skill - Deciding how many teammates to spawn for a task - Choosing between preset team configurations - Selecting the right agent type (subagent_type) for each role - Configuring teammate display modes (tmux, iTerm2, in-process) - Building custom team compositions for non-standard workflows ## Team Sizing Heuristics | Complexity | Team Size | When to Use | | ------------ | --------- | ----------------------------------------------------------- | | Simple | 1-2 | Single-dimension review, isolated bug, small feature | | Moderate | 2-3 | Multi-file changes, 2-3 concerns, medium features | | Complex | 3-4 | Cross-cutting concerns, large features, deep debugging | | Very Complex | 4-5 | Full-stack features, comprehensive reviews, systemic issues | **Rule of thumb**: Start with the smallest team that covers all required dimensions. Adding teammates increases coordination overhead. ## Preset Team Compositions ### Review Team - **Size**: 3 reviewers - **Agents**: 3x `team-reviewer` - **Default dimensions**: security, performance, architecture - **Use when**: Code changes need multi-dimensional quality assessment ### Debug Team - **Size**: 3 investigators - **Agents**: 3x `team-debugger` - **Default hypotheses**: 3 competing hypotheses - **Use when**: Bug has multiple plausible root causes ### Feature Team - **Size**: 3 (1 lead + 2 implementers) - **Agents**: 1x `team-lead` + 2x `team-implementer` - **Use when**: Feature can be decomposed into parallel work streams ### Fullstack Team - **Size**: 4 (1 lead + 3 implementers) - **Agents**: 1x `team-lead` + 1x frontend `team-implementer` + 1x backend `team-implementer` + 1x test `team-implementer` - **Use when**: Feature spans frontend, backend, and test layers ### Research Team - **Size**: 3 researchers - **Agents**: 3x `general-purpose` - **Default areas**: Each assigned a different research question, module, or topic - **Capabilities**: Codebase search (Grep, Glob, Read), web search (WebSearch, WebFetch) - **Use when**: Need to understand a codebase, research libraries, compare approaches, or gather information from code and web sources in parallel ### Security Team - **Size**: 4 reviewers - **Agents**: 4x `team-reviewer` - **Default dimensions**: OWASP/vulnerabilities, auth/access control, dependencies/supply chain, secrets/configuration - **Use when**: Comprehensive security audit covering multiple attack surfaces ### Migration Team - **Size**: 4 (1 lead + 2 implementers + 1 reviewer) - **Agents**: 1x `team-lead` + 2x `team-implementer` + 1x `team-reviewer` - **Use when**: Large codebase migration (framework upgrade, language port, API version bump) requiring parallel work with correctness verification ## Agent Type Selection When spawning teammates with the Task tool, choose `subagent_type` based on what tools the teammate needs: | Agent Type | Tools Available | Use For | | ------------------------------ | ----------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- | | `general-purpose` | All tools (Read, Write, Edit, Bash, etc.) | Implementation, debugging, any task requiring file changes | | `Explore` | Read-only tools (Read, Grep, Glob) | Research, code exploration, analysis | | `Plan` | Read-only tools | Architecture planning, task decomposition | | `agent-teams:team-reviewer` | All tools | Code review with structured findings | | `agent-teams:team-debugger` | All tools | Hypothesis-driven investigation | | `agent-teams:team-implementer` | All tools | Building features within file ownership boundaries | | `agent-teams:team-lead` | All tools | Team orchestration and coordination | **Key distinction**: Read-only agents (Explore, Plan) cannot modify files. Never assign implementation tasks to read-only agents. ## Display Mode Configuration Configure in `~/.claude/settings.json`: ```json { "teammateMode": "tmux" } ``` | Mode | Behavior | Best For | | -------------- | ------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------- | | `"tmux"` | Each teammate in a tmux pane | Development workflows, monitoring multiple agents | | `"iterm2"` | Each teammate in an iTerm2 tab | macOS users who prefer iTerm2 | | `"in-process"` | All teammates in same process | Simple tasks, CI/CD environments | ## Custom Team Guidelines When building custom teams: 1. **Every team needs a coordinator** β€” Either designate a `team-lead` or have the user coordinate directly 2. **Match roles to agent types** β€” Use specialized agents (reviewer, debugger, implementer) when available 3. **Avoid duplicate roles** β€” Two agents doing the same thing wastes resources 4. **Define boundaries upfront** β€” Each teammate needs clear ownership of files or responsibilities 5. **Keep it small** β€” 2-4 teammates is the sweet spot; 5+ requires significant coordination overhead
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

multi-reviewer-patterns

Coordinate parallel code reviews across multiple quality dimensions

coding
⭐1
# Multi-Reviewer Patterns Patterns for coordinating parallel code reviews across multiple quality dimensions, deduplicating findings, calibrating severity, and producing consolidated reports. ## When to Use This Skill - Organizing a multi-dimensional code review - Deciding which review dimensions to assign - Deduplicating findings from multiple reviewers - Calibrating severity ratings consistently - Producing a consolidated review report ## Review Dimension Allocation ### Available Dimensions | Dimension | Focus | When to Include | | ----------------- | --------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------- | | **Security** | Vulnerabilities, auth, input validation | Always for code handling user input or auth | | **Performance** | Query efficiency, memory, caching | When changing data access or hot paths | | **Architecture** | SOLID, coupling, patterns | For structural changes or new modules | | **Testing** | Coverage, quality, edge cases | When adding new functionality | | **Accessibility** | WCAG, ARIA, keyboard nav | For UI/frontend changes | ### Recommended Combinations | Scenario | Dimensions | | ---------------------- | -------------------------------------------- | | API endpoint changes | Security, Performance, Architecture | | Frontend component | Architecture, Testing, Accessibility | | Database migration | Performance, Architecture | | Authentication changes | Security, Testing | | Full feature review | Security, Performance, Architecture, Testing | ## Finding Deduplication When multiple reviewers report issues at the same location: ### Merge Rules 1. **Same file:line, same issue** β€” Merge into one finding, credit all reviewers 2. **Same file:line, different issues** β€” Keep as separate findings 3. **Same issue, different locations** β€” Keep separate but cross-reference 4. **Conflicting severity** β€” Use the higher severity rating 5. **Conflicting recommendations** β€” Include both with reviewer attribution ### Deduplication Process ``` For each finding in all reviewer reports: 1. Check if another finding references the same file:line 2. If yes, check if they describe the same issue 3. If same issue: merge, keeping the more detailed description 4. If different issue: keep both, tag as "co-located" 5. Use highest severity among merged findings ``` ## Severity Calibration ### Severity Criteria | Severity | Impact | Likelihood | Examples | | ------------ | --------------------------------------------- | ---------------------- | -------------------------------------------- | | **Critical** | Data loss, security breach, complete failure | Certain or very likely | SQL injection, auth bypass, data corruption | | **High** | Significant functionality impact, degradation | Likely | Memory leak, missing validation, broken flow | | **Medium** | Partial impact, workaround exists | Possible | N+1 query, missing edge case, unclear error | | **Low** | Minimal impact, cosmetic | Unlikely | Style issue, minor optimization, naming | ### Calibration Rules - Security vulnerabilities exploitable by external users: always Critical or High - Performance issues in hot paths: at least Medium - Missing tests for critical paths: at least Medium - Accessibility violations for core functionality: at least Medium - Code style issues with no functional impact: Low ## Consolidated Report Template ```markdown ## Code Review Report **Target**: {files/PR/directory} **Reviewers**: {dimension-1}, {dimension-2}, {dimension-3} **Date**: {date} **Files Reviewed**: {count} ### Critical Findings ({count}) #### [CR-001] {Title} **Location**: `{file}:{line}` **Dimension**: {Security/Performance/etc.} **Description**: {what was found} **Impact**: {what could happen} **Fix**: {recommended remediation} ### High Findings ({count}) ... ### Medium Findings ({count}) ... ### Low Findings ({count}) ... ### Summary | Dimension | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Total | | ------------ | -------- | ----- | ------ | ----- | ------ | | Security | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 6 | | Performance | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7 | | Architecture | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | | **Total** | **1** | **3** | **9** | **5** | **18** | ### Recommendation {Overall assessment and prioritized action items} ```
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ1
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

dotnet-backend-patterns

Master C#/.NET backend development patterns for building robust

coding
⭐1
# .NET Backend Development Patterns Master C#/.NET patterns for building production-grade APIs, MCP servers, and enterprise backends with modern best practices (2024/2025). ## When to Use This Skill - Developing new .NET Web APIs or MCP servers - Reviewing C# code for quality and performance - Designing service architectures with dependency injection - Implementing caching strategies with Redis - Writing unit and integration tests - Optimizing database access with EF Core or Dapper - Configuring applications with IOptions pattern - Handling errors and implementing resilience patterns ## Core Concepts ### 1. Project Structure (Clean Architecture) ``` src/ β”œβ”€β”€ Domain/ # Core business logic (no dependencies) β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ Entities/ β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ Interfaces/ β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ Exceptions/ β”‚ └── ValueObjects/ β”œβ”€β”€ Application/ # Use cases, DTOs, validation β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ Services/ β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ DTOs/ β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ Validators/ β”‚ └── Interfaces/ β”œβ”€β”€ Infrastructure/ # External implementations β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ Data/ # EF Core, Dapper repositories β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ Caching/ # Redis, Memory cache β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ External/ # HTTP clients, third-party APIs β”‚ └── DependencyInjection/ # Service registration └── Api/ # Entry point β”œβ”€β”€ Controllers/ # Or MinimalAPI endpoints β”œβ”€β”€ Middleware/ β”œβ”€β”€ Filters/ └── Program.cs ``` ### 2. Dependency Injection Patterns ```csharp // Service registration by lifetime public static class ServiceCollectionExtensions { public static IServiceCollection AddApplicationServices( this IServiceCollection services, IConfiguration configuration) { // Scoped: One instance per HTTP request services.AddScoped<IProductService, ProductService>(); services.AddScoped<IOrderService, OrderService>(); // Singleton: One instance for app lifetime services.AddSingleton<ICacheService, RedisCacheService>(); services.AddSingleton<IConnectionMultiplexer>(_ => ConnectionMultiplexer.Connect(configuration["Redis:Connection"]!)); // Transient: New instance every time services.AddTransient<IValidator<CreateOrderRequest>, CreateOrderValidator>(); // Options pattern for configuration services.Configure<CatalogOptions>(configuration.GetSection("Catalog")); services.Configure<RedisOptions>(configuration.GetSection("Redis")); // Factory pattern for conditional creation services.AddScoped<IPriceCalculator>(sp => { var options = sp.GetRequiredService<IOptions<PricingOptions>>().Value; return options.UseNewEngine ? sp.GetRequiredService<NewPriceCalculator>() : sp.GetRequiredService<LegacyPriceCalculator>(); }); // Keyed services (.NET 8+) services.AddKeyedScoped<IPaymentProcessor, StripeProcessor>("stripe"); services.AddKeyedScoped<IPaymentProcessor, PayPalProcessor>("paypal"); return services; } } // Usage with keyed services public class CheckoutService { public CheckoutService( [FromKeyedServices("stripe")] IPaymentProcessor stripeProcessor) { _processor = stripeProcessor; } } ``` ### 3. Async/Await Patterns ```csharp // βœ… CORRECT: Async all the way down public async Task<Product> GetProductAsync(string id, CancellationToken ct = default) { return await _repository.GetByIdAsync(id, ct); } // βœ… CORRECT: Parallel execution with WhenAll public async Task<(Stock, Price)> GetStockAndPriceAsync( string productId, CancellationToken ct = default) { var stockTask = _stockService.GetAsync(productId, ct); var priceTask = _priceService.GetAsync(productId, ct); await Task.WhenAll(stockTask, priceTask); return (await stockTask, await priceTask); } // βœ… CORRECT: ConfigureAwait in libraries public async Task<T> LibraryMethodAsync<T>(CancellationToken ct = default) { var result = await _httpClient.GetAsync(url, ct).ConfigureAwait(false); return await result.Content.ReadFromJsonAsync<T>(ct).ConfigureAwait(false); } // βœ… CORRECT: ValueTask for hot paths with caching public ValueTask<Product?> GetCachedProductAsync(string id) { if (_cache.TryGetValue(id, out Product? product)) return ValueTask.FromResult(product); return new ValueTask<Product?>(GetFromDatabaseAsync(id)); } // ❌ WRONG: Blocking on async (deadlock risk) var result = GetProductAsync(id).Result; // NEVER do this var result2 = GetProductAsync(id).GetAwaiter().GetResult(); // Also bad // ❌ WRONG: async void (except event handlers) public async void ProcessOrder() { } // Exceptions are lost // ❌ WRONG: Unnecessary Task.Run for already async code await Task.Run(async () => await GetDataAsync()); // Wastes thread ``` ### 4. Configuration with IOptions ```csharp // Configuration classes public class CatalogOptions { public const string SectionName = "Catalog"; public int DefaultPageSize { get; set; } = 50; public int MaxPageSize { get; set; } = 200; public TimeSpan CacheDuration { get; set; } = TimeSpan.FromMinutes(15); public bool EnableEnrichment { get; set; } = true; } public class RedisOptions { public const string SectionName = "Redis"; public string Connection { get; set; } = "localhost:6379"; public string KeyPrefix { get; set; } = "mcp:"; public int Database { get; set; } = 0; } // appsettings.json { "Catalog": { "DefaultPageSize": 50, "MaxPageSize": 200, "CacheDuration": "00:15:00", "EnableEnrichment": true }, "Redis": { "Connection": "localhost:6379", "KeyPrefix": "mcp:", "Database": 0 } } // Registration services.Configure<CatalogOptions>(configuration.GetSection(CatalogOptions.SectionName)); services.Configure<RedisOptions>(configuration.GetSection(RedisOptions.SectionName)); // Usage with IOptions (singleton, read once at startup) public class CatalogService { private readonly CatalogOptions _options; public CatalogService(IOptions<CatalogOptions> options) { _options = options.Value; } } // Usage with IOptionsSnapshot (scoped, re-reads on each request) public class DynamicService { private readonly CatalogOptions _options; public DynamicService(IOptionsSnapshot<CatalogOptions> options) { _options = options.Value; // Fresh value per request } } // Usage with IOptionsMonitor (singleton, notified on changes) public class MonitoredService { private CatalogOptions _options; public MonitoredService(IOptionsMonitor<CatalogOptions> monitor) { _options = monitor.CurrentValue; monitor.OnChange(newOptions => _options = newOptions); } } ``` ### 5. Result Pattern (Avoiding Exceptions for Flow Control) ```csharp // Generic Result type public class Result<T> { public bool IsSuccess { get; } public T? Value { get; } public string? Error { get; } public string? ErrorCode { get; } private Result(bool isSuccess, T? value, string? error, string? errorCode) { IsSuccess = isSuccess; Value = value; Error = error; ErrorCode = errorCode; } public static Result<T> Success(T value) => new(true, value, null, null); public static Result<T> Failure(string error, string? code = null) => new(false, default, error, code); public Result<TNew> Map<TNew>(Func<T, TNew> mapper) => IsSuccess ? Result<TNew>.Success(mapper(Value!)) : Result<TNew>.Failure(Error!, ErrorCode); public async Task<Result<TNew>> MapAsync<TNew>(Func<T, Task<TNew>> mapper) => IsSuccess ? Result<TNew>.Success(await mapper(Value!)) : Result<TNew>.Failure(Error!, ErrorCode); } // Usage in service public async Task<Result<Order>> CreateOrderAsync(CreateOrderRequest request, CancellationToken ct) { // Validation var validation = await _validator.ValidateAsync(request, ct); if (!validation.IsValid) return Result<Order>.Failure( validation.Errors.First().ErrorMessage, "VALIDATION_ERROR"); // Business rule check var stock = await _stockService.CheckAsync(request.ProductId, request.Quantity, ct); if (!stock.IsAvailable) return Result<Order>.Failure( $"Insufficient stock: {stock.Available} available, {request.Quantity} requested", "INSUFFICIENT_STOCK"); // Create order var order = await _repository.CreateAsync(request.ToEntity(), ct); return Result<Order>.Success(order); } // Usage in controller/endpoint app.MapPost("/orders", async ( CreateOrderRequest request, IOrderService orderService, CancellationToken ct) => { var result = await orderService.CreateOrderAsync(request, ct); return result.IsSuccess ? Results.Created($"/orders/{result.Value!.Id}", result.Value) : Results.BadRequest(new { error = result.Error, code = result.ErrorCode }); }); ``` ## Data Access Patterns ### Entity Framework Core ```csharp // DbContext configuration public class AppDbContext : DbContext { public DbSet<Product> Products => Set<Product>(); public DbSet<Order> Orders => Set<Order>(); protected override void OnModelCreating(ModelBuilder modelBuilder) { // Apply all configurations from assembly modelBuilder.ApplyConfigurationsFromAssembly(typeof(AppDbContext).Assembly); // Global query filters modelBuilder.Entity<Product>().HasQueryFilter(p => !p.IsDeleted); } } // Entity configuration public class ProductConfiguration : IEntityTypeConfiguration<Product> { public void Configure(EntityTypeBuilder<Product> builder) { builder.ToTable("Products"); builder.HasKey(p => p.Id); builder.Property(p => p.Id).HasMaxLength(40); builder.Property(p => p.Name).HasMaxLength(200).IsRequired(); builder.Property(p => p.Price).HasPrecision(18, 2); builder.HasIndex(p => p.Sku).IsUnique(); builder.HasIndex(p => new { p.CategoryId, p.Name }); builder.HasMany(p => p.OrderItems) .WithOne(oi => oi.Product) .HasForeignKey(oi => oi.ProductId); } } // Repository with EF Core public class ProductRepository : IProductRepository { private readonly AppDbContext _context; public async Task<Product?> GetByIdAsync(string id, CancellationToken ct = default) { return await _context.Products .AsNoTracking() .FirstOrDefaultAsync(p => p.Id == id, ct); } public async Task<IReadOnlyList<Product>> SearchAsync( ProductSearchCriteria criteria, CancellationToken ct = default) { var query = _context.Products.AsNoTracking(); if (!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(criteria.SearchTerm)) query = query.Where(p => EF.Functions.Like(p.Name, $"%{criteria.SearchTerm}%")); if (criteria.CategoryId.HasValue) query = query.Where(p => p.CategoryId == criteria.CategoryId); if (criteria.MinPrice.HasValue) query = query.Where(p => p.Price >= criteria.MinPrice); if (criteria.MaxPrice.HasValue) query = query.Where(p => p.Price <= criteria.MaxPrice); return await query .OrderBy(p => p.Name) .Skip((criteria.Page - 1) * criteria.PageSize) .Take(criteria.PageSize) .ToListAsync(ct); } } ``` ### Dapper for Performance ```csharp public class DapperProductRepository : IProductRepository { private readonly IDbConnection _connection; public async Task<Product?> GetByIdAsync(string id, CancellationToken ct = default) { const string sql = """ SELECT Id, Name, Sku, Price, CategoryId, Stock, CreatedAt FROM Products WHERE Id = @Id AND IsDeleted = 0 """; return await _connection.QueryFirstOrDefaultAsync<Product>( new CommandDefinition(sql, new { Id = id }, cancellationToken: ct)); } public async Task<IReadOnlyList<Product>> SearchAsync( ProductSearchCriteria criteria, CancellationToken ct = default) { var sql = new StringBuilder(""" SELECT Id, Name, Sku, Price, CategoryId, Stock, CreatedAt FROM Products WHERE IsDeleted = 0 """); var parameters = new DynamicParameters(); if (!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(criteria.SearchTerm)) { sql.Append(" AND Name LIKE @SearchTerm"); parameters.Add("SearchTerm", $"%{criteria.SearchTerm}%"); } if (criteria.CategoryId.HasValue) { sql.Append(" AND CategoryId = @CategoryId"); parameters.Add("CategoryId", criteria.CategoryId); } if (criteria.MinPrice.HasValue) { sql.Append(" AND Price >= @MinPrice"); parameters.Add("MinPrice", criteria.MinPrice); } if (criteria.MaxPrice.HasValue) { sql.Append(" AND Price <= @MaxPrice"); parameters.Add("MaxPrice", criteria.MaxPrice); } sql.Append(" ORDER BY Name OFFSET @Offset ROWS FETCH NEXT @PageSize ROWS ONLY"); parameters.Add("Offset", (criteria.Page - 1) * criteria.PageSize); parameters.Add("PageSize", criteria.PageSize); var results = await _connection.QueryAsync<Product>( new CommandDefinition(sql.ToString(), parameters, cancellationToken: ct)); return results.ToList(); } // Multi-mapping for related data public async Task<Order?> GetOrderWithItemsAsync(int orderId, CancellationToken ct = default) { const string sql = """ SELECT o.*, oi.*, p.* FROM Orders o LEFT JOIN OrderItems oi ON o.Id = oi.OrderId LEFT JOIN Products p ON oi.ProductId = p.Id WHERE o.Id = @OrderId """; var orderDictionary = new Dictionary<int, Order>(); await _connection.QueryAsync<Order, OrderItem, Product, Order>( new CommandDefinition(sql, new { OrderId = orderId }, cancellationToken: ct), (order, item, product) => { if (!orderDictionary.TryGetValue(order.Id, out var existingOrder)) { existingOrder = order; existingOrder.Items = new List<OrderItem>(); orderDictionary.Add(order.Id, existingOrder); } if (item != null) { item.Product = product; existingOrder.Items.Add(item); } return existingOrder; }, splitOn: "Id,Id"); return orderDictionary.Values.FirstOrDefault(); } } ``` ## Caching Patterns ### Multi-Level Cache with Redis ```csharp public class CachedProductService : IProductService { private readonly IProductRepository _repository; private readonly IMemoryCache _memoryCache; private readonly IDistributedCache _distributedCache; private readonly ILogger<CachedProductService> _logger; private static readonly TimeSpan MemoryCacheDuration = TimeSpan.FromMinutes(1); private static readonly TimeSpan DistributedCacheDuration = TimeSpan.FromMinutes(15); public async Task<Product?> GetByIdAsync(string id, CancellationToken ct = default) { var cacheKey = $"product:{id}"; // L1: Memory cache (in-process, fastest) if (_memoryCache.TryGetValue(cacheKey, out Product? cached)) { _logger.LogDebug("L1 cache hit for {CacheKey}", cacheKey); return cached; } // L2: Distributed cache (Redis) var distributed = await _distributedCache.GetStringAsync(cacheKey, ct); if (distributed != null) { _logger.LogDebug("L2 cache hit for {CacheKey}", cacheKey); var product = JsonSerializer.Deserialize<Product>(distributed); // Populate L1 _memoryCache.Set(cacheKey, product, MemoryCacheDuration); return product; } // L3: Database _logger.LogDebug("Cache miss for {CacheKey}, fetching from database", cacheKey); var fromDb = await _repository.GetByIdAsync(id, ct); if (fromDb != null) { var serialized = JsonSerializer.Serialize(fromDb); // Populate both caches await _distributedCache.SetStringAsync( cacheKey, serialized, new DistributedCacheEntryOptions { AbsoluteExpirationRelativeToNow = DistributedCacheDuration }, ct); _memoryCache.Set(cacheKey, fromDb, MemoryCacheDuration); } return fromDb; } public async Task InvalidateAsync(string id, CancellationToken ct = default) { var cacheKey = $"product:{id}"; _memoryCache.Remove(cacheKey); await _distributedCache.RemoveAsync(cacheKey, ct); _logger.LogInformation("Invalidated cache for {CacheKey}", cacheKey); } } // Stale-while-revalidate pattern public class StaleWhileRevalidateCache<T> { private readonly IDistributedCache _cache; private readonly TimeSpan _freshDuration; private readonly TimeSpan _staleDuration; public async Task<T?> GetOrCreateAsync( string key, Func<CancellationToken, Task<T>> factory, CancellationToken ct = default) { var cached = await _cache.GetStringAsync(key, ct); if (cached != null) { var entry = JsonSerializer.Deserialize<CacheEntry<T>>(cached)!; if (entry.IsStale && !entry.IsExpired) { // Return stale data immediately, refresh in background _ = Task.Run(async () => { var fresh = await factory(CancellationToken.None); await SetAsync(key, fresh, CancellationToken.None); }); } if (!entry.IsExpired) return entry.Value; } // Cache miss or expired var value = await factory(ct); await SetAsync(key, value, ct); return value; } private record CacheEntry<TValue>(TValue Value, DateTime CreatedAt) { public bool IsStale => DateTime.UtcNow - CreatedAt > _freshDuration; public bool IsExpired => DateTime.UtcNow - CreatedAt > _staleDuration; } } ``` ## Testing Patterns ### Unit Tests with xUnit and Moq ```csharp public class OrderServiceTests { private readonly Mock<IOrderRepository> _mockRepository; private readonly Mock<IStockService> _mockStockService; private readonly Mock<IValidator<CreateOrderRequest>> _mockValidator; private readonly OrderService _sut; // System Under Test public OrderServiceTests() { _mockRepository = new Mock<IOrderRepository>(); _mockStockService = new Mock<IStockService>(); _mockValidator = new Mock<IValidator<CreateOrderRequest>>(); // Default: validation passes _mockValidator .Setup(v => v.ValidateAsync(It.IsAny<CreateOrderRequest>(), It.IsAny<
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

screen-reader-testing

Test web applications with screen readers including VoiceOver,

coding
⭐1
# Screen Reader Testing Practical guide to testing web applications with screen readers for comprehensive accessibility validation. ## When to Use This Skill - Validating screen reader compatibility - Testing ARIA implementations - Debugging assistive technology issues - Verifying form accessibility - Testing dynamic content announcements - Ensuring navigation accessibility ## Core Concepts ### 1. Major Screen Readers | Screen Reader | Platform | Browser | Usage | | ------------- | --------- | -------------- | ----- | | **VoiceOver** | macOS/iOS | Safari | ~15% | | **NVDA** | Windows | Firefox/Chrome | ~31% | | **JAWS** | Windows | Chrome/IE | ~40% | | **TalkBack** | Android | Chrome | ~10% | | **Narrator** | Windows | Edge | ~4% | ### 2. Testing Priority ``` Minimum Coverage: 1. NVDA + Firefox (Windows) 2. VoiceOver + Safari (macOS) 3. VoiceOver + Safari (iOS) Comprehensive Coverage: + JAWS + Chrome (Windows) + TalkBack + Chrome (Android) + Narrator + Edge (Windows) ``` ### 3. Screen Reader Modes | Mode | Purpose | When Used | | ------------------ | ---------------------- | ----------------- | | **Browse/Virtual** | Read content | Default reading | | **Focus/Forms** | Interact with controls | Filling forms | | **Application** | Custom widgets | ARIA applications | ## VoiceOver (macOS) ### Setup ``` Enable: System Preferences β†’ Accessibility β†’ VoiceOver Toggle: Cmd + F5 Quick Toggle: Triple-press Touch ID ``` ### Essential Commands ``` Navigation: VO = Ctrl + Option (VoiceOver modifier) VO + Right Arrow Next element VO + Left Arrow Previous element VO + Shift + Down Enter group VO + Shift + Up Exit group Reading: VO + A Read all from cursor Ctrl Stop speaking VO + B Read current paragraph Interaction: VO + Space Activate element VO + Shift + M Open menu Tab Next focusable element Shift + Tab Previous focusable element Rotor (VO + U): Navigate by: Headings, Links, Forms, Landmarks Left/Right Arrow Change rotor category Up/Down Arrow Navigate within category Enter Go to item Web Specific: VO + Cmd + H Next heading VO + Cmd + J Next form control VO + Cmd + L Next link VO + Cmd + T Next table ``` ### Testing Checklist ```markdown ## VoiceOver Testing Checklist ### Page Load - [ ] Page title announced - [ ] Main landmark found - [ ] Skip link works ### Navigation - [ ] All headings discoverable via rotor - [ ] Heading levels logical (H1 β†’ H2 β†’ H3) - [ ] Landmarks properly labeled - [ ] Skip links functional ### Links & Buttons - [ ] Link purpose clear - [ ] Button actions described - [ ] New window/tab announced ### Forms - [ ] All labels read with inputs - [ ] Required fields announced - [ ] Error messages read - [ ] Instructions available - [ ] Focus moves to errors ### Dynamic Content - [ ] Alerts announced immediately - [ ] Loading states communicated - [ ] Content updates announced - [ ] Modals trap focus correctly ### Tables - [ ] Headers associated with cells - [ ] Table navigation works - [ ] Complex tables have captions ``` ### Common Issues & Fixes ```html <!-- Issue: Button not announcing purpose --> <button><svg>...</svg></button> <!-- Fix --> <button aria-label="Close dialog"><svg aria-hidden="true">...</svg></button> <!-- Issue: Dynamic content not announced --> <div id="results">New results loaded</div> <!-- Fix --> <div id="results" role="status" aria-live="polite">New results loaded</div> <!-- Issue: Form error not read --> <input type="email" /> <span class="error">Invalid email</span> <!-- Fix --> <input type="email" aria-invalid="true" aria-describedby="email-error" /> <span id="email-error" role="alert">Invalid email</span> ``` ## NVDA (Windows) ### Setup ``` Download: nvaccess.org Start: Ctrl + Alt + N Stop: Insert + Q ``` ### Essential Commands ``` Navigation: Insert = NVDA modifier Down Arrow Next line Up Arrow Previous line Tab Next focusable Shift + Tab Previous focusable Reading: NVDA + Down Arrow Say all Ctrl Stop speech NVDA + Up Arrow Current line Headings: H Next heading Shift + H Previous heading 1-6 Heading level 1-6 Forms: F Next form field B Next button E Next edit field X Next checkbox C Next combo box Links: K Next link U Next unvisited link V Next visited link Landmarks: D Next landmark Shift + D Previous landmark Tables: T Next table Ctrl + Alt + Arrows Navigate cells Elements List (NVDA + F7): Shows all links, headings, form fields, landmarks ``` ### Browse vs Focus Mode ``` NVDA automatically switches modes: - Browse Mode: Arrow keys navigate content - Focus Mode: Arrow keys control interactive elements Manual switch: NVDA + Space Watch for: - "Browse mode" announcement when navigating - "Focus mode" when entering form fields - Application role forces forms mode ``` ### Testing Script ```markdown ## NVDA Test Script ### Initial Load 1. Navigate to page 2. Let page finish loading 3. Press Insert + Down to read all 4. Note: Page title, main content identified? ### Landmark Navigation 1. Press D repeatedly 2. Check: All main areas reachable? 3. Check: Landmarks properly labeled? ### Heading Navigation 1. Press Insert + F7 β†’ Headings 2. Check: Logical heading structure? 3. Press H to navigate headings 4. Check: All sections discoverable? ### Form Testing 1. Press F to find first form field 2. Check: Label read? 3. Fill in invalid data 4. Submit form 5. Check: Errors announced? 6. Check: Focus moved to error? ### Interactive Elements 1. Tab through all interactive elements 2. Check: Each announces role and state 3. Activate buttons with Enter/Space 4. Check: Result announced? ### Dynamic Content 1. Trigger content update 2. Check: Change announced? 3. Open modal 4. Check: Focus trapped? 5. Close modal 6. Check: Focus returns? ``` ## JAWS (Windows) ### Essential Commands ``` Start: Desktop shortcut or Ctrl + Alt + J Virtual Cursor: Auto-enabled in browsers Navigation: Arrow keys Navigate content Tab Next focusable Insert + Down Read all Ctrl Stop speech Quick Keys: H Next heading T Next table F Next form field B Next button G Next graphic L Next list ; Next landmark Forms Mode: Enter Enter forms mode Numpad + Exit forms mode F5 List form fields Lists: Insert + F7 Link list Insert + F6 Heading list Insert + F5 Form field list Tables: Ctrl + Alt + Arrows Table navigation ``` ## TalkBack (Android) ### Setup ``` Enable: Settings β†’ Accessibility β†’ TalkBack Toggle: Hold both volume buttons 3 seconds ``` ### Gestures ``` Explore: Drag finger across screen Next: Swipe right Previous: Swipe left Activate: Double tap Scroll: Two finger swipe Reading Controls (swipe up then right): - Headings - Links - Controls - Characters - Words - Lines - Paragraphs ``` ## Common Test Scenarios ### 1. Modal Dialog ```html <!-- Accessible modal structure --> <div role="dialog" aria-modal="true" aria-labelledby="dialog-title" aria-describedby="dialog-desc" > <h2 id="dialog-title">Confirm Delete</h2> <p id="dialog-desc">This action cannot be undone.</p> <button>Cancel</button> <button>Delete</button> </div> ``` ```javascript // Focus management function openModal(modal) { // Store last focused element lastFocus = document.activeElement; // Move focus to modal modal.querySelector("h2").focus(); // Trap focus modal.addEventListener("keydown", trapFocus); } function closeModal(modal) { // Return focus lastFocus.focus(); } function trapFocus(e) { if (e.key === "Tab") { const focusable = modal.querySelectorAll( 'button, [href], input, select, textarea, [tabindex]:not([tabindex="-1"])', ); const first = focusable[0]; const last = focusable[focusable.length - 1]; if (e.shiftKey && document.activeElement === first) { last.focus(); e.preventDefault(); } else if (!e.shiftKey && document.activeElement === last) { first.focus(); e.preventDefault(); } } if (e.key === "Escape") { closeModal(modal); } } ``` ### 2. Live Regions ```html <!-- Status messages (polite) --> <div role="status" aria-live="polite" aria-atomic="true"> <!-- Content updates will be announced after current speech --> </div> <!-- Alerts (assertive) --> <div role="alert" aria-live="assertive"> <!-- Content updates interrupt current speech --> </div> <!-- Progress updates --> <div role="progressbar" aria-valuenow="75" aria-valuemin="0" aria-valuemax="100" aria-label="Upload progress" ></div> <!-- Log (additions only) --> <div role="log" aria-live="polite" aria-relevant="additions"> <!-- New messages announced, removals not --> </div> ``` ### 3. Tab Interface ```html <div role="tablist" aria-label="Product information"> <button role="tab" id="tab-1" aria-selected="true" aria-controls="panel-1"> Description </button> <button role="tab" id="tab-2" aria-selected="false" aria-controls="panel-2" tabindex="-1" > Reviews </button> </div> <div role="tabpanel" id="panel-1" aria-labelledby="tab-1"> Product description content... </div> <div role="tabpanel" id="panel-2" aria-labelledby="tab-2" hidden> Reviews content... </div> ``` ```javascript // Tab keyboard navigation tablist.addEventListener("keydown", (e) => { const tabs = [...tablist.querySelectorAll('[role="tab"]')]; const index = tabs.indexOf(document.activeElement); let newIndex; switch (e.key) { case "ArrowRight": newIndex = (index + 1) % tabs.length; break; case "ArrowLeft": newIndex = (index - 1 + tabs.length) % tabs.length; break; case "Home": newIndex = 0; break; case "End": newIndex = tabs.length - 1; break; default: return; } tabs[newIndex].focus(); activateTab(tabs[newIndex]); e.preventDefault(); }); ``` ## Debugging Tips ```javascript // Log what screen reader sees function logAccessibleName(element) { const computed = window.getComputedStyle(element); console.log({ role: element.getAttribute("role") || element.tagName, name: element.getAttribute("aria-label") || element.getAttribute("aria-labelledby") || element.textContent, state: { expanded: element.getAttribute("aria-expanded"), selected: element.getAttribute("aria-selected"), checked: element.getAttribute("aria-checked"), disabled: element.disabled, }, visible: computed.display !== "none" && computed.visibility !== "hidden", }); } ``` ## Best Practices ### Do's - **Test with actual screen readers** - Not just simulators - **Use semantic HTML first** - ARIA is supplemental - **Test in browse and focus modes** - Different experiences - **Verify focus management** - Especially for SPAs - **Test keyboard only first** - Foundation for SR testing ### Don'ts - **Don't assume one SR is enough** - Test multiple - **Don't ignore mobile** - Growing user base - **Don't test only happy path** - Test error states - **Don't skip dynamic content** - Most common issues - **Don't rely on visual testing** - Different experience ## Resources - [VoiceOver User Guide](https://support.apple.com/guide/voiceover/welcome/mac) - [NVDA User Guide](https://www.nvaccess.org/files/nvda/documentation/userGuide.html) - [JAWS Documentation](https://support.freedomscientific.com/Products/Blindness/JAWS) - [WebAIM Screen Reader Survey](https://webaim.org/projects/screenreadersurvey/)
πŸ‘1
πŸ‘οΈ1
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

projection-patterns

Build read models and projections from event streams. Use when

coding
⭐1
# Projection Patterns Comprehensive guide to building projections and read models for event-sourced systems. ## When to Use This Skill - Building CQRS read models - Creating materialized views from events - Optimizing query performance - Implementing real-time dashboards - Building search indexes from events - Aggregating data across streams ## Core Concepts ### 1. Projection Architecture ``` β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ Event Store │────►│ Projector │────►│ Read Model β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ (Database) β”‚ β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ Events β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ Handler β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ Tables β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ Logic β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ Views β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ Cache β”‚ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ ``` ### 2. Projection Types | Type | Description | Use Case | | -------------- | --------------------------- | ---------------------- | | **Live** | Real-time from subscription | Current state queries | | **Catchup** | Process historical events | Rebuilding read models | | **Persistent** | Stores checkpoint | Resume after restart | | **Inline** | Same transaction as write | Strong consistency | ## Templates ### Template 1: Basic Projector ```python from abc import ABC, abstractmethod from dataclasses import dataclass from typing import Dict, Any, Callable, List import asyncpg @dataclass class Event: stream_id: str event_type: str data: dict version: int global_position: int class Projection(ABC): """Base class for projections.""" @property @abstractmethod def name(self) -> str: """Unique projection name for checkpointing.""" pass @abstractmethod def handles(self) -> List[str]: """List of event types this projection handles.""" pass @abstractmethod async def apply(self, event: Event) -> None: """Apply event to the read model.""" pass class Projector: """Runs projections from event store.""" def __init__(self, event_store, checkpoint_store): self.event_store = event_store self.checkpoint_store = checkpoint_store self.projections: List[Projection] = [] def register(self, projection: Projection): self.projections.append(projection) async def run(self, batch_size: int = 100): """Run all projections continuously.""" while True: for projection in self.projections: await self._run_projection(projection, batch_size) await asyncio.sleep(0.1) async def _run_projection(self, projection: Projection, batch_size: int): checkpoint = await self.checkpoint_store.get(projection.name) position = checkpoint or 0 events = await self.event_store.read_all(position, batch_size) for event in events: if event.event_type in projection.handles(): await projection.apply(event) await self.checkpoint_store.save( projection.name, event.global_position ) async def rebuild(self, projection: Projection): """Rebuild a projection from scratch.""" await self.checkpoint_store.delete(projection.name) # Optionally clear read model tables await self._run_projection(projection, batch_size=1000) ``` ### Template 2: Order Summary Projection ```python class OrderSummaryProjection(Projection): """Projects order events to a summary read model.""" def __init__(self, db_pool: asyncpg.Pool): self.pool = db_pool @property def name(self) -> str: return "order_summary" def handles(self) -> List[str]: return [ "OrderCreated", "OrderItemAdded", "OrderItemRemoved", "OrderShipped", "OrderCompleted", "OrderCancelled" ] async def apply(self, event: Event) -> None: handlers = { "OrderCreated": self._handle_created, "OrderItemAdded": self._handle_item_added, "OrderItemRemoved": self._handle_item_removed, "OrderShipped": self._handle_shipped, "OrderCompleted": self._handle_completed, "OrderCancelled": self._handle_cancelled, } handler = handlers.get(event.event_type) if handler: await handler(event) async def _handle_created(self, event: Event): async with self.pool.acquire() as conn: await conn.execute( """ INSERT INTO order_summaries (order_id, customer_id, status, total_amount, item_count, created_at) VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4, $5, $6) """, event.data['order_id'], event.data['customer_id'], 'pending', 0, 0, event.data['created_at'] ) async def _handle_item_added(self, event: Event): async with self.pool.acquire() as conn: await conn.execute( """ UPDATE order_summaries SET total_amount = total_amount + $2, item_count = item_count + 1, updated_at = NOW() WHERE order_id = $1 """, event.data['order_id'], event.data['price'] * event.data['quantity'] ) async def _handle_item_removed(self, event: Event): async with self.pool.acquire() as conn: await conn.execute( """ UPDATE order_summaries SET total_amount = total_amount - $2, item_count = item_count - 1, updated_at = NOW() WHERE order_id = $1 """, event.data['order_id'], event.data['price'] * event.data['quantity'] ) async def _handle_shipped(self, event: Event): async with self.pool.acquire() as conn: await conn.execute( """ UPDATE order_summaries SET status = 'shipped', shipped_at = $2, updated_at = NOW() WHERE order_id = $1 """, event.data['order_id'], event.data['shipped_at'] ) async def _handle_completed(self, event: Event): async with self.pool.acquire() as conn: await conn.execute( """ UPDATE order_summaries SET status = 'completed', completed_at = $2, updated_at = NOW() WHERE order_id = $1 """, event.data['order_id'], event.data['completed_at'] ) async def _handle_cancelled(self, event: Event): async with self.pool.acquire() as conn: await conn.execute( """ UPDATE order_summaries SET status = 'cancelled', cancelled_at = $2, cancellation_reason = $3, updated_at = NOW() WHERE order_id = $1 """, event.data['order_id'], event.data['cancelled_at'], event.data.get('reason') ) ``` ### Template 3: Elasticsearch Search Projection ```python from elasticsearch import AsyncElasticsearch class ProductSearchProjection(Projection): """Projects product events to Elasticsearch for full-text search.""" def __init__(self, es_client: AsyncElasticsearch): self.es = es_client self.index = "products" @property def name(self) -> str: return "product_search" def handles(self) -> List[str]: return [ "ProductCreated", "ProductUpdated", "ProductPriceChanged", "ProductDeleted" ] async def apply(self, event: Event) -> None: if event.event_type == "ProductCreated": await self.es.index( index=self.index, id=event.data['product_id'], document={ 'name': event.data['name'], 'description': event.data['description'], 'category': event.data['category'], 'price': event.data['price'], 'tags': event.data.get('tags', []), 'created_at': event.data['created_at'] } ) elif event.event_type == "ProductUpdated": await self.es.update( index=self.index, id=event.data['product_id'], doc={ 'name': event.data['name'], 'description': event.data['description'], 'category': event.data['category'], 'tags': event.data.get('tags', []), 'updated_at': event.data['updated_at'] } ) elif event.event_type == "ProductPriceChanged": await self.es.update( index=self.index, id=event.data['product_id'], doc={ 'price': event.data['new_price'], 'price_updated_at': event.data['changed_at'] } ) elif event.event_type == "ProductDeleted": await self.es.delete( index=self.index, id=event.data['product_id'] ) ``` ### Template 4: Aggregating Projection ```python class DailySalesProjection(Projection): """Aggregates sales data by day for reporting.""" def __init__(self, db_pool: asyncpg.Pool): self.pool = db_pool @property def name(self) -> str: return "daily_sales" def handles(self) -> List[str]: return ["OrderCompleted", "OrderRefunded"] async def apply(self, event: Event) -> None: if event.event_type == "OrderCompleted": await self._increment_sales(event) elif event.event_type == "OrderRefunded": await self._decrement_sales(event) async def _increment_sales(self, event: Event): date = event.data['completed_at'][:10] # YYYY-MM-DD async with self.pool.acquire() as conn: await conn.execute( """ INSERT INTO daily_sales (date, total_orders, total_revenue, total_items) VALUES ($1, 1, $2, $3) ON CONFLICT (date) DO UPDATE SET total_orders = daily_sales.total_orders + 1, total_revenue = daily_sales.total_revenue + $2, total_items = daily_sales.total_items + $3, updated_at = NOW() """, date, event.data['total_amount'], event.data['item_count'] ) async def _decrement_sales(self, event: Event): date = event.data['original_completed_at'][:10] async with self.pool.acquire() as conn: await conn.execute( """ UPDATE daily_sales SET total_orders = total_orders - 1, total_revenue = total_revenue - $2, total_refunds = total_refunds + $2, updated_at = NOW() WHERE date = $1 """, date, event.data['refund_amount'] ) ``` ### Template 5: Multi-Table Projection ```python class CustomerActivityProjection(Projection): """Projects customer activity across multiple tables.""" def __init__(self, db_pool: asyncpg.Pool): self.pool = db_pool @property def name(self) -> str: return "customer_activity" def handles(self) -> List[str]: return [ "CustomerCreated", "OrderCompleted", "ReviewSubmitted", "CustomerTierChanged" ] async def apply(self, event: Event) -> None: async with self.pool.acquire() as conn: async with conn.transaction(): if event.event_type == "CustomerCreated": # Insert into customers table await conn.execute( """ INSERT INTO customers (customer_id, email, name, tier, created_at) VALUES ($1, $2, $3, 'bronze', $4) """, event.data['customer_id'], event.data['email'], event.data['name'], event.data['created_at'] ) # Initialize activity summary await conn.execute( """ INSERT INTO customer_activity_summary (customer_id, total_orders, total_spent, total_reviews) VALUES ($1, 0, 0, 0) """, event.data['customer_id'] ) elif event.event_type == "OrderCompleted": # Update activity summary await conn.execute( """ UPDATE customer_activity_summary SET total_orders = total_orders + 1, total_spent = total_spent + $2, last_order_at = $3 WHERE customer_id = $1 """, event.data['customer_id'], event.data['total_amount'], event.data['completed_at'] ) # Insert into order history await conn.execute( """ INSERT INTO customer_order_history (customer_id, order_id, amount, completed_at) VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4) """, event.data['customer_id'], event.data['order_id'], event.data['total_amount'], event.data['completed_at'] ) elif event.event_type == "ReviewSubmitted": await conn.execute( """ UPDATE customer_activity_summary SET total_reviews = total_reviews + 1, last_review_at = $2 WHERE customer_id = $1 """, event.data['customer_id'], event.data['submitted_at'] ) elif event.event_type == "CustomerTierChanged": await conn.execute( """ UPDATE customers SET tier = $2, updated_at = NOW() WHERE customer_id = $1 """, event.data['customer_id'], event.data['new_tier'] ) ``` ## Best Practices ### Do's - **Make projections idempotent** - Safe to replay - **Use transactions** - For multi-table updates - **Store checkpoints** - Resume after failures - **Monitor lag** - Alert on projection delays - **Plan for rebuilds** - Design for reconstruction ### Don'ts - **Don't couple projections** - Each is independent - **Don't skip error handling** - Log and alert on failures - **Don't ignore ordering** - Events must be processed in order - **Don't over-normalize** - Denormalize for query patterns ## Resources - [CQRS Pattern](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/cqrs) - [Projection Building Blocks](https://zimarev.com/blog/event-sourcing/projections/)
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

changelog-automation

Automate changelog generation from commits, PRs, and releases

coding
⭐1
# Changelog Automation Patterns and tools for automating changelog generation, release notes, and version management following industry standards. ## When to Use This Skill - Setting up automated changelog generation - Implementing Conventional Commits - Creating release note workflows - Standardizing commit message formats - Generating GitHub/GitLab release notes - Managing semantic versioning ## Core Concepts ### 1. Keep a Changelog Format ```markdown # Changelog All notable changes to this project will be documented in this file. The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.1.0/), and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html). ## [Unreleased] ### Added - New feature X ## [1.2.0] - 2024-01-15 ### Added - User profile avatars - Dark mode support ### Changed - Improved loading performance by 40% ### Deprecated - Old authentication API (use v2) ### Removed - Legacy payment gateway ### Fixed - Login timeout issue (#123) ### Security - Updated dependencies for CVE-2024-1234 [Unreleased]: https://github.com/user/repo/compare/v1.2.0...HEAD [1.2.0]: https://github.com/user/repo/compare/v1.1.0...v1.2.0 ``` ### 2. Conventional Commits ``` <type>[optional scope]: <description> [optional body] [optional footer(s)] ``` | Type | Description | Changelog Section | | ---------- | ---------------- | ------------------ | | `feat` | New feature | Added | | `fix` | Bug fix | Fixed | | `docs` | Documentation | (usually excluded) | | `style` | Formatting | (usually excluded) | | `refactor` | Code restructure | Changed | | `perf` | Performance | Changed | | `test` | Tests | (usually excluded) | | `chore` | Maintenance | (usually excluded) | | `ci` | CI changes | (usually excluded) | | `build` | Build system | (usually excluded) | | `revert` | Revert commit | Removed | ### 3. Semantic Versioning ``` MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH MAJOR: Breaking changes (feat! or BREAKING CHANGE) MINOR: New features (feat) PATCH: Bug fixes (fix) ``` ## Implementation ### Method 1: Conventional Changelog (Node.js) ```bash # Install tools npm install -D @commitlint/cli @commitlint/config-conventional npm install -D husky npm install -D standard-version # or npm install -D semantic-release # Setup commitlint cat > commitlint.config.js << 'EOF' module.exports = { extends: ['@commitlint/config-conventional'], rules: { 'type-enum': [ 2, 'always', [ 'feat', 'fix', 'docs', 'style', 'refactor', 'perf', 'test', 'chore', 'ci', 'build', 'revert', ], ], 'subject-case': [2, 'never', ['start-case', 'pascal-case', 'upper-case']], 'subject-max-length': [2, 'always', 72], }, }; EOF # Setup husky npx husky init echo "npx --no -- commitlint --edit \$1" > .husky/commit-msg ``` ### Method 2: standard-version Configuration ```javascript // .versionrc.js module.exports = { types: [ { type: "feat", section: "Features" }, { type: "fix", section: "Bug Fixes" }, { type: "perf", section: "Performance Improvements" }, { type: "revert", section: "Reverts" }, { type: "docs", section: "Documentation", hidden: true }, { type: "style", section: "Styles", hidden: true }, { type: "chore", section: "Miscellaneous", hidden: true }, { type: "refactor", section: "Code Refactoring", hidden: true }, { type: "test", section: "Tests", hidden: true }, { type: "build", section: "Build System", hidden: true }, { type: "ci", section: "CI/CD", hidden: true }, ], commitUrlFormat: "{{host}}/{{owner}}/{{repository}}/commit/{{hash}}", compareUrlFormat: "{{host}}/{{owner}}/{{repository}}/compare/{{previousTag}}...{{currentTag}}", issueUrlFormat: "{{host}}/{{owner}}/{{repository}}/issues/{{id}}", userUrlFormat: "{{host}}/{{user}}", releaseCommitMessageFormat: "chore(release): {{currentTag}}", scripts: { prebump: 'echo "Running prebump"', postbump: 'echo "Running postbump"', prechangelog: 'echo "Running prechangelog"', postchangelog: 'echo "Running postchangelog"', }, }; ``` ```json // package.json scripts { "scripts": { "release": "standard-version", "release:minor": "standard-version --release-as minor", "release:major": "standard-version --release-as major", "release:patch": "standard-version --release-as patch", "release:dry": "standard-version --dry-run" } } ``` ### Method 3: semantic-release (Full Automation) ```javascript // release.config.js module.exports = { branches: [ "main", { name: "beta", prerelease: true }, { name: "alpha", prerelease: true }, ], plugins: [ "@semantic-release/commit-analyzer", "@semantic-release/release-notes-generator", [ "@semantic-release/changelog", { changelogFile: "CHANGELOG.md", }, ], [ "@semantic-release/npm", { npmPublish: true, }, ], [ "@semantic-release/github", { assets: ["dist/**/*.js", "dist/**/*.css"], }, ], [ "@semantic-release/git", { assets: ["CHANGELOG.md", "package.json"], message: "chore(release): ${nextRelease.version} [skip ci]\n\n${nextRelease.notes}", }, ], ], }; ``` ### Method 4: GitHub Actions Workflow ```yaml # .github/workflows/release.yml name: Release on: push: branches: [main] workflow_dispatch: inputs: release_type: description: "Release type" required: true default: "patch" type: choice options: - patch - minor - major permissions: contents: write pull-requests: write jobs: release: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 with: fetch-depth: 0 token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} - uses: actions/setup-node@v4 with: node-version: "20" cache: "npm" - run: npm ci - name: Configure Git run: | git config user.name "github-actions[bot]" git config user.email "github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com" - name: Run semantic-release env: GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} NPM_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.NPM_TOKEN }} run: npx semantic-release # Alternative: manual release with standard-version manual-release: if: github.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch' runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 with: fetch-depth: 0 - uses: actions/setup-node@v4 with: node-version: "20" - run: npm ci - name: Configure Git run: | git config user.name "github-actions[bot]" git config user.email "github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com" - name: Bump version and generate changelog run: npx standard-version --release-as ${{ inputs.release_type }} - name: Push changes run: git push --follow-tags origin main - name: Create GitHub Release uses: softprops/action-gh-release@v1 with: tag_name: ${{ steps.version.outputs.tag }} body_path: RELEASE_NOTES.md generate_release_notes: true ``` ### Method 5: git-cliff (Rust-based, Fast) ```toml # cliff.toml [changelog] header = """ # Changelog All notable changes to this project will be documented in this file. """ body = """ {% if version %}\ ## [{{ version | trim_start_matches(pat="v") }}] - {{ timestamp | date(format="%Y-%m-%d") }} {% else %}\ ## [Unreleased] {% endif %}\ {% for group, commits in commits | group_by(attribute="group") %} ### {{ group | upper_first }} {% for commit in commits %} - {% if commit.scope %}**{{ commit.scope }}:** {% endif %}\ {{ commit.message | upper_first }}\ {% if commit.github.pr_number %} ([#{{ commit.github.pr_number }}](https://github.com/owner/repo/pull/{{ commit.github.pr_number }})){% endif %}\ {% endfor %} {% endfor %} """ footer = """ {% for release in releases -%} {% if release.version -%} {% if release.previous.version -%} [{{ release.version | trim_start_matches(pat="v") }}]: \ https://github.com/owner/repo/compare/{{ release.previous.version }}...{{ release.version }} {% endif -%} {% else -%} [unreleased]: https://github.com/owner/repo/compare/{{ release.previous.version }}...HEAD {% endif -%} {% endfor %} """ trim = true [git] conventional_commits = true filter_unconventional = true split_commits = false commit_parsers = [ { message = "^feat", group = "Features" }, { message = "^fix", group = "Bug Fixes" }, { message = "^doc", group = "Documentation" }, { message = "^perf", group = "Performance" }, { message = "^refactor", group = "Refactoring" }, { message = "^style", group = "Styling" }, { message = "^test", group = "Testing" }, { message = "^chore\\(release\\)", skip = true }, { message = "^chore", group = "Miscellaneous" }, ] filter_commits = false tag_pattern = "v[0-9]*" skip_tags = "" ignore_tags = "" topo_order = false sort_commits = "oldest" [github] owner = "owner" repo = "repo" ``` ```bash # Generate changelog git cliff -o CHANGELOG.md # Generate for specific range git cliff v1.0.0..v2.0.0 -o RELEASE_NOTES.md # Preview without writing git cliff --unreleased --dry-run ``` ### Method 6: Python (commitizen) ```toml # pyproject.toml [tool.commitizen] name = "cz_conventional_commits" version = "1.0.0" version_files = [ "pyproject.toml:version", "src/__init__.py:__version__", ] tag_format = "v$version" update_changelog_on_bump = true changelog_incremental = true changelog_start_rev = "v0.1.0" [tool.commitizen.customize] message_template = "{{change_type}}{% if scope %}({{scope}}){% endif %}: {{message}}" schema = "<type>(<scope>): <subject>" schema_pattern = "^(feat|fix|docs|style|refactor|perf|test|chore)(\\(\\w+\\))?:\\s.*" bump_pattern = "^(feat|fix|perf|refactor)" bump_map = {"feat" = "MINOR", "fix" = "PATCH", "perf" = "PATCH", "refactor" = "PATCH"} ``` ```bash # Install pip install commitizen # Create commit interactively cz commit # Bump version and update changelog cz bump --changelog # Check commits cz check --rev-range HEAD~5..HEAD ``` ## Release Notes Templates ### GitHub Release Template ```markdown ## What's Changed ### πŸš€ Features {{ range .Features }} - {{ .Title }} by @{{ .Author }} in #{{ .PR }} {{ end }} ### πŸ› Bug Fixes {{ range .Fixes }} - {{ .Title }} by @{{ .Author }} in #{{ .PR }} {{ end }} ### πŸ“š Documentation {{ range .Docs }} - {{ .Title }} by @{{ .Author }} in #{{ .PR }} {{ end }} ### πŸ”§ Maintenance {{ range .Chores }} - {{ .Title }} by @{{ .Author }} in #{{ .PR }} {{ end }} ## New Contributors {{ range .NewContributors }} - @{{ .Username }} made their first contribution in #{{ .PR }} {{ end }} **Full Changelog**: https://github.com/owner/repo/compare/v{{ .Previous }}...v{{ .Current }} ``` ### Internal Release Notes ```markdown # Release v2.1.0 - January 15, 2024 ## Summary This release introduces dark mode support and improves checkout performance by 40%. It also includes important security updates. ## Highlights ### πŸŒ™ Dark Mode Users can now switch to dark mode from settings. The preference is automatically saved and synced across devices. ### ⚑ Performance - Checkout flow is 40% faster - Reduced bundle size by 15% ## Breaking Changes None in this release. ## Upgrade Guide No special steps required. Standard deployment process applies. ## Known Issues - Dark mode may flicker on initial load (fix scheduled for v2.1.1) ## Dependencies Updated | Package | From | To | Reason | | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------------------------ | | react | 18.2.0 | 18.3.0 | Performance improvements | | lodash | 4.17.20 | 4.17.21 | Security patch | ``` ## Commit Message Examples ```bash # Feature with scope feat(auth): add OAuth2 support for Google login # Bug fix with issue reference fix(checkout): resolve race condition in payment processing Closes #123 # Breaking change feat(api)!: change user endpoint response format BREAKING CHANGE: The user endpoint now returns `userId` instead of `id`. Migration guide: Update all API consumers to use the new field name. # Multiple paragraphs fix(database): handle connection timeouts gracefully Previously, connection timeouts would cause the entire request to fail without retry. This change implements exponential backoff with up to 3 retries before failing. The timeout threshold has been increased from 5s to 10s based on p99 latency analysis. Fixes #456 Reviewed-by: @alice ``` ## Best Practices ### Do's - **Follow Conventional Commits** - Enables automation - **Write clear messages** - Future you will thank you - **Reference issues** - Link commits to tickets - **Use scopes consistently** - Define team conventions - **Automate releases** - Reduce manual errors ### Don'ts - **Don't mix changes** - One logical change per commit - **Don't skip validation** - Use commitlint - **Don't manual edit** - Generated changelogs only - **Don't forget breaking changes** - Mark with `!` or footer - **Don't ignore CI** - Validate commits in pipeline ## Resources - [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/) - [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/) - [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/) - [semantic-release](https://semantic-release.gitbook.io/) - [git-cliff](https://git-cliff.org/)
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered