Skip to main content
EVOKORE// BROWSE
>

./browse/prompts

38 NODES
📝text•3 hours ago

Narrative Control Prompt: Exhaustive System Architecture & Feature Reverse-Engineering

Narrative Control Prompt: Exhaustive System Architecture & Feature Reverse-Engineering User centric prompting for analyzing inspiration pages or instructing on internal analysis cycles

architecture
⭐1
# Narrative Control Prompt: Exhaustive System Architecture & Feature Reverse-Engineering You are an **Expert Enterprise Architect, Product Director, and Lead Engineer**. Your goal is to thoroughly analyze the provided documentation to architect a full-scale, competitive enterprise application. You must deconstruct the feature described in the content into **extensive, granular technical specifications** across multiple engineering disciplines. **CRITICAL INSTRUCTIONS**: - **DO NOT SUMMARIZE**. Be exhaustive. - For every category below, aim to list **10+ specific items** if possible. - Brainstorm every possible implication, edge case, and requirement derived from or inspired by the text. - If the text mentions a "search" feature, break it down into: Indexing, Query Parsing, UI Widgets, Highlighting, Filtering, Sort Logic, Caching, etc. Please output the analysis in the following Markdown format: # 1. Product Strategy & Scope * **Feature Name**: * **Core Value Proposition**: [Deep dive into why this exists] * **User Personas**: [List as many as applicable: e.g. Admin, Power User, Viewer, Auditor, API Consumer...] * **User Stories**: [Extensive list of 10+ granular user stories e.g. "As a User, I want to..."] * **Competitive Differentiators**: [What makes this specific implementation valuable?] # 2. Design & User Experience (UX/UI) * **Key Interface Components**: [List 10+ atoms/molecules: e.g. Data Grid, Filter Chips, Modals, Tooltips, Empty States, Toasts, Dropdowns...] * **Interaction Patterns**: [List 10+ patterns: e.g. Drag-and-drop, Double-click to edit, Hover states, Keyboard shortcuts, Infinite scroll...] * **Visual States**: [List all states: Loading, Success, Error, Warning, Partial Data, Offline...] * **Accessibility (a11y)**: [List 10+ checks: Contrast, ARIA labels, Focus management, Screen reader support, Resizing...] # 3. Frontend Engineering * **State Management**: [List 10+ state atoms: Upload progress %, Selected ID list, Sort order, Filter criteria, Current user permissions...] * **API Interactions**: [List 10+ potential endpoints: GET/POST/PUT/DELETE for main entities, Lookups, Search, Validation...] * **Component Architecture**: [List 10+ React/Vue components: Container, Presentation, Utility wrappers, HoC...] * **Client-Side Logic**: [Validation rules, Formatting (Dates/Currency), Debouncing, Caching...] # 4. Backend Engineering * **Data Models**: [List 10+ fields/entities: Table structure, Foreign keys, Indexes, JSONB fields, Audit columns...] * **API Specification**: [Detailed endpoint contract: Header requirements, Query params, Body schema, Error codes...] * **Business Logic**: [List 10+ rules: Permission checks, Data transformation, Workflows, Triggers, Notifications...] * **Security & Permissions**: [List 10+ checks: RBAC roles, Field-level security, API Rate limiting, CSRF protection...] # 5. Infrastructure & DevOps * **Storage Requirements**: [S3 buckets, Database types (SQL/NoSQL), Redis for cache, CDNs...] * **Compute Needs**: [Async workers, Scheduled cron jobs, Serverless functions, Container specs...] * **Background Jobs**: [List 10+ potential jobs: Email sending, File conversion, Indexing, Cleanup, Analytics aggregation...] * **Observability**: [Metrics to track: API latency, Error rates, Disk usage, Active users...] # 6. Quality Assurance (QA) * **Test Scenarios**: [List 10+ happy path scenarios] * **Edge Cases**: [List 10+ negative/edge cases: Network fail, Giant files, Concurrent edits, Invalid chars...] * **Performance Metrics**: [Specific SLAs: <200ms API, <1s Page load, 99.9% Uptime...] * **Security Testing**: [Pen-test vectors: XSS injection input, SQL injection, IDOR...] # 7. Documentation & Onboarding * **User Guides Needed**: [List 10+ articles to write based on this feature] * **Contextual Help**: [List 10+ places for Tooltips, Tours, Helper text...] * **API Documentation**: [Swagger/OpenAPI requirements] # 8. Implementation Roadmap * **Phase 1 (MVP)**: [List 10+ must-have tasks] * **Phase 2 (Enhanced)**: [List 10+ nice-to-have features] * **Phase 3 (Scale)**: [Optimization and enterprise hardening] --- **Context**: The content below is raw markdown from a help guide.
👍0
👁️0
🤖 Auto-discovered
📝text•3 hours ago

Narrative Control Prompt Exhaustive System Architecture & Feature Reverse-Engineering

Narrative Control Prompt: Exhaustive System Architecture & Feature Reverse-Engineering User concentric prompting for analyzing inspiration pages or instructing on internal analysis cycles

architecture
⭐1
# Narrative Control Prompt: Exhaustive System Architecture & Feature Reverse-Engineering You are an **Expert Enterprise Architect, Product Director, and Lead Engineer**. Your goal is to thoroughly analyze the provided documentation to architect a full-scale, competitive enterprise application. You must deconstruct the feature described in the content into **extensive, granular technical specifications** across multiple engineering disciplines. **CRITICAL INSTRUCTIONS**: - **DO NOT SUMMARIZE**. Be exhaustive. - For every category below, aim to list **10+ specific items** if possible. - Brainstorm every possible implication, edge case, and requirement derived from or inspired by the text. - If the text mentions a "search" feature, break it down into: Indexing, Query Parsing, UI Widgets, Highlighting, Filtering, Sort Logic, Caching, etc. Please output the analysis in the following Markdown format: # 1. Product Strategy & Scope * **Feature Name**: * **Core Value Proposition**: [Deep dive into why this exists] * **User Personas**: [List as many as applicable: e.g. Admin, Power User, Viewer, Auditor, API Consumer...] * **User Stories**: [Extensive list of 10+ granular user stories e.g. "As a User, I want to..."] * **Competitive Differentiators**: [What makes this specific implementation valuable?] # 2. Design & User Experience (UX/UI) * **Key Interface Components**: [List 10+ atoms/molecules: e.g. Data Grid, Filter Chips, Modals, Tooltips, Empty States, Toasts, Dropdowns...] * **Interaction Patterns**: [List 10+ patterns: e.g. Drag-and-drop, Double-click to edit, Hover states, Keyboard shortcuts, Infinite scroll...] * **Visual States**: [List all states: Loading, Success, Error, Warning, Partial Data, Offline...] * **Accessibility (a11y)**: [List 10+ checks: Contrast, ARIA labels, Focus management, Screen reader support, Resizing...] # 3. Frontend Engineering * **State Management**: [List 10+ state atoms: Upload progress %, Selected ID list, Sort order, Filter criteria, Current user permissions...] * **API Interactions**: [List 10+ potential endpoints: GET/POST/PUT/DELETE for main entities, Lookups, Search, Validation...] * **Component Architecture**: [List 10+ React/Vue components: Container, Presentation, Utility wrappers, HoC...] * **Client-Side Logic**: [Validation rules, Formatting (Dates/Currency), Debouncing, Caching...] # 4. Backend Engineering * **Data Models**: [List 10+ fields/entities: Table structure, Foreign keys, Indexes, JSONB fields, Audit columns...] * **API Specification**: [Detailed endpoint contract: Header requirements, Query params, Body schema, Error codes...] * **Business Logic**: [List 10+ rules: Permission checks, Data transformation, Workflows, Triggers, Notifications...] * **Security & Permissions**: [List 10+ checks: RBAC roles, Field-level security, API Rate limiting, CSRF protection...] # 5. Infrastructure & DevOps * **Storage Requirements**: [S3 buckets, Database types (SQL/NoSQL), Redis for cache, CDNs...] * **Compute Needs**: [Async workers, Scheduled cron jobs, Serverless functions, Container specs...] * **Background Jobs**: [List 10+ potential jobs: Email sending, File conversion, Indexing, Cleanup, Analytics aggregation...] * **Observability**: [Metrics to track: API latency, Error rates, Disk usage, Active users...] # 6. Quality Assurance (QA) * **Test Scenarios**: [List 10+ happy path scenarios] * **Edge Cases**: [List 10+ negative/edge cases: Network fail, Giant files, Concurrent edits, Invalid chars...] * **Performance Metrics**: [Specific SLAs: <200ms API, <1s Page load, 99.9% Uptime...] * **Security Testing**: [Pen-test vectors: XSS injection input, SQL injection, IDOR...] # 7. Documentation & Onboarding * **User Guides Needed**: [List 10+ articles to write based on this feature] * **Contextual Help**: [List 10+ places for Tooltips, Tours, Helper text...] * **API Documentation**: [Swagger/OpenAPI requirements] # 8. Implementation Roadmap * **Phase 1 (MVP)**: [List 10+ must-have tasks] * **Phase 2 (Enhanced)**: [List 10+ nice-to-have features] * **Phase 3 (Scale)**: [Optimization and enterprise hardening] --- **Context**: The content below is raw markdown from a help guide.
👍0
👁️0
🤖 Auto-discovered
🤖system prompt•6 months ago

Semantic Session Checkpointing Pattern

Record lightweight semantic checkpoints at planning, risk, failure, and handoff boundaries while keeping heartbeat outside the model loop.

productivity
⭐1
# Semantic Session Checkpointing Pattern Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this pattern when session continuity matters and you need checkpoints that survive model drift or hard crashes. ## Use this when - Capturing handoff context during long sessions - Checkpointing before risky refactors - Separating liveness tracking from agent behavior ## Expected outcomes - Checkpoint timing becomes explicit and repeatable - Session heartbeat stays reliable even if the model stalls - Handoffs capture task, next action, files touched, and risk ## Source synthesis - REVOKORE/docs/MCP-Integration.md ## Dedupe notes Uses the compact REVOKORE integration guide as a distinct session-state pattern that is not already covered by EVOKORE-MCP or AGENT33 docs. ## Source excerpts ### REVOKORE/docs/MCP-Integration.md ## Recommended MCP Pattern Expose a tool that writes a short checkpoint into the active session: - current task - next action - files touched - blocker or risk The simplest implementation is to call: ```powershell REVOKORE/scripts/Write-AiCliCheckpoint.ps1 -Kind note -Message "working on auth bug" ``` From an MCP server, you can call the same script directly or append JSON lines to `REVOKORE_CHECKPOINT_PATH`.
👍0
👁️14
docs
🤖system prompt•6 months ago

Hook Observability and Session Replay

Instrument hooks with replayable logs, task-state visibility, and non-blocking observability around agent sessions.

devops
⭐1
# Hook Observability and Session Replay Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this skill when you need to understand what hooks fired, what they emitted, and how a session can be replayed after the fact. ## Use this when - Debugging hook-driven automation - Replaying session events after failures - Adding observability without blocking interactive work ## Expected outcomes - Hook activity becomes inspectable and replayable - Operational state survives beyond a single terminal session - Observability stays useful without overwhelming operators ## Source synthesis - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/VOICE_AND_HOOKS.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/VOICE_AND_HOOKS.md) - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/USE_CASES_AND_WALKTHROUGHS.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/USE_CASES_AND_WALKTHROUGHS.md) ## Dedupe notes Focuses on replay and observability instead of importing the broader voice-sidecar guide verbatim. ## Source excerpts ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/VOICE_AND_HOOKS.md EVOKORE currently has three separate voice-related systems plus a set of hook and observability utilities. They overlap in operator workflows, but they are not the same runtime. ## The three voice-related systems ### 1. ElevenLabs MCP proxy This is the optional `elevenlabs` child server configured in `mcp.config.json`. What it is: - proxied through the EVOKORE router - exposed as prefixed MCP tools - available to any EVOKORE-connected MCP client when configured successfully What it is for: - text-to-speech and other ElevenLabs MCP operations as tools - routing voice-related actions through the standard EVOKORE proxy/security stack Requirements: - `uvx` available on PATH - `ELEVENLABS_API_KEY` set ### 2. VoiceMode VoiceMode is a separate voice-conversation system for Claude Code. What it is: - registered separately from EVOKORE - not routed through EVOKORE’s stdio server - used for bidirectional voice conversation in Claude Code What it is for: - speaking to Claude and hearing spoken responses - using `OPENAI_API_KEY` and VoiceMode’s own runtime Windows note: - VoiceMode relies on `uvx` being directly available - set `OPENAI_API_KEY` in the shell that launches Claude Code ### 3. VoiceSidecar VoiceSidecar is a standalone WebSocket server implemented in `src/Voice ... ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/USE_CASES_AND_WALKTHROUGHS.md This guide turns the runtime contracts into practical operator flows. ## Walkthrough 1: Adopt a workflow from the skill library Use this when you want EVOKORE to retrieve process guidance before the model starts acting. ### Goal Find and adopt an existing workflow such as `session-wrap`. ### Steps 1. Ask the client to search skills: ```text Search the MCP for a workflow about session wrap-up and continuity. ``` 2. EVOKORE uses `search_skills` and returns matching skills. 3. Ask for a specific skill: ```text Show me help for the session-wrap skill. ``` 4. EVOKORE uses `get_skill_help` and returns the skill’s internal instructions. 5. For broader task matching, ask: ```text Resolve a workflow for wrapping this session, documenting open risks, and preparing the next handoff. ``` 6. EVOKORE uses `resolve_workflow` and injects the top 1-3 relevant workflows directly into the tool response. ### Why this matters - keeps the model grounded in repo-specific process - reduces prompt drift - makes handoff and governance behavior repeatable ## Walkthrough 2: Use a proxied tool that requires HITL approval Use this when the tool is configured as `require_approval` in `permissions.yml`. ### Goal Allow a protected proxied tool call such as `fs_write_f ...
👍0
👁️0
docs
🤖system prompt•6 months ago

Dynamic Tool Discovery and Session Activation

Expose only native tools at session start, then activate proxied tools on demand through a searchable discovery layer.

architecture
⭐1
# Dynamic Tool Discovery and Session Activation Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this skill when you need smaller tool payloads, exact-name compatibility, and session-scoped tool activation. ## Use this when - Reducing tool-list bloat for focused sessions - Preserving exact-name tool calls while hiding noise - Activating proxied tools only when a task requires them ## Expected outcomes - Discovery changes listing visibility without breaking routing - Session-scoped activation keeps tools relevant to the task - Operators can trade compatibility against payload size intentionally ## Source synthesis - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/TOOLS_AND_DISCOVERY.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/TOOLS_AND_DISCOVERY.md) ## Dedupe notes Uses the canonical EVOKORE-MCP discovery doc instead of duplicating the same concept from walkthrough and migration docs. ## Source excerpts ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/TOOLS_AND_DISCOVERY.md This page explains how EVOKORE presents tools, how proxy names are built, and how `discover_tools` changes the visible tool surface. ## Two tool populations ### Native EVOKORE tools These tools are defined by EVOKORE itself: - `docs_architect` - `skill_creator` - `resolve_workflow` - `search_skills` - `get_skill_help` - `discover_tools` Properties: - always available - always visible - not subject to proxy prefixing ### Proxied child-server tools These come from child servers in `mcp.config.json`. Current configured sources: - `github` - `fs` - optional `elevenlabs` Properties: - fetched from child servers at startup - renamed with server prefixes - governed by `permissions.yml` - routed through `ProxyManager` ## Prefixing and compatibility EVOKORE rewrites proxied tool names to: ```text ${serverId}_${tool.name} ``` Why this exists: - prevents tool-name collisions across child servers - makes origin obvious during execution and review - keeps exact-name routing deterministic Examples: | Upstream tool | EVOKORE-exposed tool | |---|---| | `read_file` from `fs` | `fs_read_file` | | `create_issue` from `github` | `github_create_issue` | ### Duplicate-prefixed name policy If two child registrations would create the same final prefixed name: - the first registration wins - later duplicates are skipped - EVOKORE logs a warning and duplicate summary ## Discovery modes | Mode | What `tools/list` returns | Best for | |---|---|---| | `legacy` | all native + proxied tools | maximum compatibility | | `dynamic` | native tools + session-activated proxied tools | smaller initial tool payloads | Environment toggle: ```bash EVOKORE_TOOL_DISCOVERY_MODE=legacy EVOKORE_TOOL_DISCOVERY_MODE=dynamic ``` ## Dynamic discovery lifecycle In `dynamic` mode, EVOKORE uses a session-scoped activation set. Lifecycle: 1. session starts with only native tools visible 2. user/model calls `discover_tools` 3. `ToolCatalogIndex` searches the merged native + proxied catalog 4. matching proxied tools are activated for that session 5. EVOKORE emits `sendToolListChanged()` best-effort 6. client re-runs `tools/list` or auto-refreshes ```mermaid flowchart TD A[Session starts in dynamic mode] --> B[tools/list shows native tools] B --> C[discover_tools query] C --> D[ToolCatalogIndex searches merged catalog] D --> E[Matching proxied tools added to session activation set] E --> F[sendToolListChanged best-effort] F --> G[Client refreshes tools/list] G --> H[Activated proxied tools now visible] D --> I[Exact-name proxied call still works eve ...
👍0
👁️0
docs
📝text•6 months ago

Evaluation and Regression Gate

Create evaluation runs, submit results, compute metrics, save baselines, and triage regressions before shipping changes.

analysis
⭐1
# Evaluation and Regression Gate Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this workflow to formalize benchmarking, regression detection, and baseline management around agent or product changes. ## Use this when - Validating changes against prior baselines - Making regressions visible before rollout - Capturing repeatable evaluation evidence ## Expected outcomes - Evaluation runs produce comparable metrics - Baselines are stored after successful validation - Regression triage becomes a workflow instead of an afterthought ## Source synthesis - AGENT33/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md) - AGENT33/docs/use-cases.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/use-cases.md) ## Dedupe notes Combines AGENT33 evaluation lifecycle definitions with evaluation and regression use-case framing. ## Source excerpts ### AGENT33/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md ### 4.3 Evaluation Lifecycle Flow: 1. Create run (`/v1/evaluations/runs`) 2. Submit task results (`/runs/{id}/results`) 3. Compute metrics + gate report 4. Save baseline (`/runs/{id}/baseline`) 5. Triage/resolve regressions ### AGENT33/docs/use-cases.md ## 4. Evaluation and Regression Gates Goal: - Quantify quality and block regressions across PR/merge/release gates. Use these modules: - `api/routes/evaluations.py` - `evaluation/service.py` - `evaluation/gates.py` - `evaluation/regression.py` Typical flow: 1. Create run for gate type (`G-PR`, `G-MRG`, `G-REL`, `G-MON`). 2. Submit task results and quality metadata. 3. Compute metrics and gate verdict. 4. Save baseline for future comparison. 5. Triage/resolve regression records. Best fit: - Teams with golden-task style quality gates.
👍0
👁️0
docs
📝text•6 months ago

Guardrailed Code Review Pipeline

Run a staged code review workflow with explicit risk assessment, reviewer handoffs, and merge gates.

coding
⭐1
# Guardrailed Code Review Pipeline Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this workflow when a change needs structured review evidence, clear approval stages, and a rollback-aware path to merge. ## Use this when - Multi-step L1 and L2 review signoff - High-risk changes that need audit trails - Standardizing reviewer decisions before merge ## Expected outcomes - Review states and approval checkpoints stay explicit - Risk assessment and evidence are captured before merge - The workflow remains small enough to reuse across repositories ## Source synthesis - AGENT33/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md) - AGENT33/docs/walkthroughs.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/walkthroughs.md) ## Dedupe notes Combines AGENT33 lifecycle mapping and operator walkthrough material into one review-oriented site entry. ## Source excerpts ### AGENT33/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md ### 4.1 Review Lifecycle States: - `draft -> ready -> l1-review -> l1-approved -> (optional l2-review -> l2-approved) -> approved -> merged` Main APIs: - `/v1/reviews/{id}/assess` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/assign-l1` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/l1` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/assign-l2` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/l2` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/approve` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/merge` ### AGENT33/docs/walkthroughs.md ## 4. Review Lifecycle (Two-Layer Signoff) Create review: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/ \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"task_id":"TASK-101","branch":"feat/docs-refresh","pr_number":12}' ``` Assess risk: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/assess \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"triggers":["api-public","security"]}' ``` Move to ready and assign L1: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/ready -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/assign-l1 -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" ``` Submit L1 decision: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/l1 \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"decision":"approved","issues":[],"comments":"L1 pass"}' ``` If L2 required, continue: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/assign-l2 -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/l2 \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"decision":"approved","issues":[],"commen ...
👍0
👁️0
docs
🤖system prompt•7 months ago

task-coordination-strategies

Decompose complex tasks, design dependency graphs, and coordinate

coding
⭐1
# Task Coordination Strategies Strategies for decomposing complex tasks into parallelizable units, designing dependency graphs, writing effective task descriptions, and monitoring workload across agent teams. ## When to Use This Skill - Breaking down a complex task for parallel execution - Designing task dependency relationships (blockedBy/blocks) - Writing task descriptions with clear acceptance criteria - Monitoring and rebalancing workload across teammates - Identifying the critical path in a multi-task workflow ## Task Decomposition Strategies ### By Layer Split work by architectural layer: - Frontend components - Backend API endpoints - Database migrations/models - Test suites **Best for**: Full-stack features, vertical slices ### By Component Split work by functional component: - Authentication module - User profile module - Notification module **Best for**: Microservices, modular architectures ### By Concern Split work by cross-cutting concern: - Security review - Performance review - Architecture review **Best for**: Code reviews, audits ### By File Ownership Split work by file/directory boundaries: - `src/components/` — Implementer 1 - `src/api/` — Implementer 2 - `src/utils/` — Implementer 3 **Best for**: Parallel implementation, conflict avoidance ## Dependency Graph Design ### Principles 1. **Minimize chain depth** — Prefer wide, shallow graphs over deep chains 2. **Identify the critical path** — The longest chain determines minimum completion time 3. **Use blockedBy sparingly** — Only add dependencies that are truly required 4. **Avoid circular dependencies** — Task A blocks B blocks A is a deadlock ### Patterns **Independent (Best parallelism)**: ``` Task A ─┐ Task B ─┼─→ Integration Task C ─┘ ``` **Sequential (Necessary dependencies)**: ``` Task A → Task B → Task C ``` **Diamond (Mixed)**: ``` ┌→ Task B ─┐ Task A ─┤ ├→ Task D └→ Task C ─┘ ``` ### Using blockedBy/blocks ``` TaskCreate: { subject: "Build API endpoints" } → Task #1 TaskCreate: { subject: "Build frontend components" } → Task #2 TaskCreate: { subject: "Integration testing" } → Task #3 TaskUpdate: { taskId: "3", addBlockedBy: ["1", "2"] } → #3 waits for #1 and #2 ``` ## Task Description Best Practices Every task should include: 1. **Objective** — What needs to be accomplished (1-2 sentences) 2. **Owned Files** — Explicit list of files/directories this teammate may modify 3. **Requirements** — Specific deliverables or behaviors expected 4. **Interface Contracts** — How this work connects to other teammates' work 5. **Acceptance Criteria** — How to verify the task is done correctly 6. **Scope Boundaries** — What is explicitly out of scope ### Template ``` ## Objective Build the user authentication API endpoints. ## Owned Files - src/api/auth.ts - src/api/middleware/auth-middleware.ts - src/types/auth.ts (shared — read only, do not modify) ## Requirements - POST /api/login — accepts email/password, returns JWT - POST /api/register — creates new user, returns JWT - GET /api/me — returns current user profile (requires auth) ## Interface Contract - Import User type from src/types/auth.ts (owned by implementer-1) - Export AuthResponse type for frontend consumption ## Acceptance Criteria - All endpoints return proper HTTP status codes - JWT tokens expire after 24 hours - Passwords are hashed with bcrypt ## Out of Scope - OAuth/social login - Password reset flow - Rate limiting ``` ## Workload Monitoring ### Indicators of Imbalance | Signal | Meaning | Action | | -------------------------- | ------------------- | --------------------------- | | Teammate idle, others busy | Uneven distribution | Reassign pending tasks | | Teammate stuck on one task | Possible blocker | Check in, offer help | | All tasks blocked | Dependency issue | Resolve critical path first | | One teammate has 3x others | Overloaded | Split tasks or reassign | ### Rebalancing Steps 1. Call `TaskList` to assess current state 2. Identify idle or overloaded teammates 3. Use `TaskUpdate` to reassign tasks 4. Use `SendMessage` to notify affected teammates 5. Monitor for improved throughput
👍0
👁️0
🤖 Auto-discovered
🤖system prompt•7 months ago

team-communication-protocols

Structured messaging protocols for agent team communication

coding
⭐1
# Team Communication Protocols Protocols for effective communication between agent teammates, including message type selection, plan approval workflows, shutdown procedures, and common anti-patterns to avoid. ## When to Use This Skill - Establishing communication norms for a new team - Choosing between message types (message, broadcast, shutdown_request) - Handling plan approval workflows - Managing graceful team shutdown - Discovering teammate identities and capabilities ## Message Type Selection ### `message` (Direct Message) — Default Choice Send to a single specific teammate: ```json { "type": "message", "recipient": "implementer-1", "content": "Your API endpoint is ready. You can now build the frontend form.", "summary": "API endpoint ready for frontend" } ``` **Use for**: Task updates, coordination, questions, integration notifications. ### `broadcast` — Use Sparingly Send to ALL teammates simultaneously: ```json { "type": "broadcast", "content": "Critical: shared types file has been updated. Pull latest before continuing.", "summary": "Shared types updated" } ``` **Use ONLY for**: Critical blockers affecting everyone, major changes to shared resources. **Why sparingly?**: Each broadcast sends N separate messages (one per teammate), consuming API resources proportional to team size. ### `shutdown_request` — Graceful Termination Request a teammate to shut down: ```json { "type": "shutdown_request", "recipient": "reviewer-1", "content": "Review complete, shutting down team." } ``` The teammate responds with `shutdown_response` (approve or reject with reason). ## Communication Anti-Patterns | Anti-Pattern | Problem | Better Approach | | --------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------- | | Broadcasting routine updates | Wastes resources, noise | Direct message to affected teammate | | Sending JSON status messages | Not designed for structured data | Use TaskUpdate to update task status | | Not communicating at integration points | Teammates build against stale interfaces | Message when your interface is ready | | Micromanaging via messages | Overwhelms teammates, slows work | Check in at milestones, not every step | | Using UUIDs instead of names | Hard to read, error-prone | Always use teammate names | | Ignoring idle teammates | Wasted capacity | Assign new work or shut down | ## Plan Approval Workflow When a teammate is spawned with `plan_mode_required`: 1. Teammate creates a plan using read-only exploration tools 2. Teammate calls `ExitPlanMode` which sends a `plan_approval_request` to the lead 3. Lead reviews the plan 4. Lead responds with `plan_approval_response`: **Approve**: ```json { "type": "plan_approval_response", "request_id": "abc-123", "recipient": "implementer-1", "approve": true } ``` **Reject with feedback**: ```json { "type": "plan_approval_response", "request_id": "abc-123", "recipient": "implementer-1", "approve": false, "content": "Please add error handling for the API calls" } ``` ## Shutdown Protocol ### Graceful Shutdown Sequence 1. **Lead sends shutdown_request** to each teammate 2. **Teammate receives request** as a JSON message with `type: "shutdown_request"` 3. **Teammate responds** with `shutdown_response`: - `approve: true` — Teammate saves state and exits - `approve: false` + reason — Teammate continues working 4. **Lead handles rejections** — Wait for teammate to finish, then retry 5. **After all teammates shut down** — Call `Teammate` cleanup ### Handling Rejections If a teammate rejects shutdown: - Check their reason (usually "still working on task") - Wait for their current task to complete - Retry shutdown request - If urgent, user can force shutdown ## Teammate Discovery Find team members by reading the config file: **Location**: `~/.claude/teams/{team-name}/config.json` **Structure**: ```json { "members": [ { "name": "security-reviewer", "agentId": "uuid-here", "agentType": "team-reviewer" }, { "name": "perf-reviewer", "agentId": "uuid-here", "agentType": "team-reviewer" } ] } ``` **Always use `name`** for messaging and task assignment. Never use `agentId` directly.
👍0
👁️0
🤖 Auto-discovered
🤖system prompt•7 months ago

team-composition-patterns

Design optimal agent team compositions with sizing heuristics,

coding
⭐1
# Team Composition Patterns Best practices for composing multi-agent teams, selecting team sizes, choosing agent types, and configuring display modes for Claude Code's Agent Teams feature. ## When to Use This Skill - Deciding how many teammates to spawn for a task - Choosing between preset team configurations - Selecting the right agent type (subagent_type) for each role - Configuring teammate display modes (tmux, iTerm2, in-process) - Building custom team compositions for non-standard workflows ## Team Sizing Heuristics | Complexity | Team Size | When to Use | | ------------ | --------- | ----------------------------------------------------------- | | Simple | 1-2 | Single-dimension review, isolated bug, small feature | | Moderate | 2-3 | Multi-file changes, 2-3 concerns, medium features | | Complex | 3-4 | Cross-cutting concerns, large features, deep debugging | | Very Complex | 4-5 | Full-stack features, comprehensive reviews, systemic issues | **Rule of thumb**: Start with the smallest team that covers all required dimensions. Adding teammates increases coordination overhead. ## Preset Team Compositions ### Review Team - **Size**: 3 reviewers - **Agents**: 3x `team-reviewer` - **Default dimensions**: security, performance, architecture - **Use when**: Code changes need multi-dimensional quality assessment ### Debug Team - **Size**: 3 investigators - **Agents**: 3x `team-debugger` - **Default hypotheses**: 3 competing hypotheses - **Use when**: Bug has multiple plausible root causes ### Feature Team - **Size**: 3 (1 lead + 2 implementers) - **Agents**: 1x `team-lead` + 2x `team-implementer` - **Use when**: Feature can be decomposed into parallel work streams ### Fullstack Team - **Size**: 4 (1 lead + 3 implementers) - **Agents**: 1x `team-lead` + 1x frontend `team-implementer` + 1x backend `team-implementer` + 1x test `team-implementer` - **Use when**: Feature spans frontend, backend, and test layers ### Research Team - **Size**: 3 researchers - **Agents**: 3x `general-purpose` - **Default areas**: Each assigned a different research question, module, or topic - **Capabilities**: Codebase search (Grep, Glob, Read), web search (WebSearch, WebFetch) - **Use when**: Need to understand a codebase, research libraries, compare approaches, or gather information from code and web sources in parallel ### Security Team - **Size**: 4 reviewers - **Agents**: 4x `team-reviewer` - **Default dimensions**: OWASP/vulnerabilities, auth/access control, dependencies/supply chain, secrets/configuration - **Use when**: Comprehensive security audit covering multiple attack surfaces ### Migration Team - **Size**: 4 (1 lead + 2 implementers + 1 reviewer) - **Agents**: 1x `team-lead` + 2x `team-implementer` + 1x `team-reviewer` - **Use when**: Large codebase migration (framework upgrade, language port, API version bump) requiring parallel work with correctness verification ## Agent Type Selection When spawning teammates with the Task tool, choose `subagent_type` based on what tools the teammate needs: | Agent Type | Tools Available | Use For | | ------------------------------ | ----------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- | | `general-purpose` | All tools (Read, Write, Edit, Bash, etc.) | Implementation, debugging, any task requiring file changes | | `Explore` | Read-only tools (Read, Grep, Glob) | Research, code exploration, analysis | | `Plan` | Read-only tools | Architecture planning, task decomposition | | `agent-teams:team-reviewer` | All tools | Code review with structured findings | | `agent-teams:team-debugger` | All tools | Hypothesis-driven investigation | | `agent-teams:team-implementer` | All tools | Building features within file ownership boundaries | | `agent-teams:team-lead` | All tools | Team orchestration and coordination | **Key distinction**: Read-only agents (Explore, Plan) cannot modify files. Never assign implementation tasks to read-only agents. ## Display Mode Configuration Configure in `~/.claude/settings.json`: ```json { "teammateMode": "tmux" } ``` | Mode | Behavior | Best For | | -------------- | ------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------- | | `"tmux"` | Each teammate in a tmux pane | Development workflows, monitoring multiple agents | | `"iterm2"` | Each teammate in an iTerm2 tab | macOS users who prefer iTerm2 | | `"in-process"` | All teammates in same process | Simple tasks, CI/CD environments | ## Custom Team Guidelines When building custom teams: 1. **Every team needs a coordinator** — Either designate a `team-lead` or have the user coordinate directly 2. **Match roles to agent types** — Use specialized agents (reviewer, debugger, implementer) when available 3. **Avoid duplicate roles** — Two agents doing the same thing wastes resources 4. **Define boundaries upfront** — Each teammate needs clear ownership of files or responsibilities 5. **Keep it small** — 2-4 teammates is the sweet spot; 5+ requires significant coordination overhead
👍0
👁️0
🤖 Auto-discovered
🤖system prompt•7 months ago

fastapi-templates

Create production-ready FastAPI projects with async patterns,

coding
⭐1
# FastAPI Project Templates Production-ready FastAPI project structures with async patterns, dependency injection, middleware, and best practices for building high-performance APIs. ## When to Use This Skill - Starting new FastAPI projects from scratch - Implementing async REST APIs with Python - Building high-performance web services and microservices - Creating async applications with PostgreSQL, MongoDB - Setting up API projects with proper structure and testing ## Core Concepts ### 1. Project Structure **Recommended Layout:** ``` app/ ├── api/ # API routes │ ├── v1/ │ │ ├── endpoints/ │ │ │ ├── users.py │ │ │ ├── auth.py │ │ │ └── items.py │ │ └── router.py │ └── dependencies.py # Shared dependencies ├── core/ # Core configuration │ ├── config.py │ ├── security.py │ └── database.py ├── models/ # Database models │ ├── user.py │ └── item.py ├── schemas/ # Pydantic schemas │ ├── user.py │ └── item.py ├── services/ # Business logic │ ├── user_service.py │ └── auth_service.py ├── repositories/ # Data access │ ├── user_repository.py │ └── item_repository.py └── main.py # Application entry ``` ### 2. Dependency Injection FastAPI's built-in DI system using `Depends`: - Database session management - Authentication/authorization - Shared business logic - Configuration injection ### 3. Async Patterns Proper async/await usage: - Async route handlers - Async database operations - Async background tasks - Async middleware ## Implementation Patterns ### Pattern 1: Complete FastAPI Application ```python # main.py from fastapi import FastAPI, Depends from fastapi.middleware.cors import CORSMiddleware from contextlib import asynccontextmanager @asynccontextmanager async def lifespan(app: FastAPI): """Application lifespan events.""" # Startup await database.connect() yield # Shutdown await database.disconnect() app = FastAPI( title="API Template", version="1.0.0", lifespan=lifespan ) # CORS middleware app.add_middleware( CORSMiddleware, allow_origins=["*"], allow_credentials=True, allow_methods=["*"], allow_headers=["*"], ) # Include routers from app.api.v1.router import api_router app.include_router(api_router, prefix="/api/v1") # core/config.py from pydantic_settings import BaseSettings from functools import lru_cache class Settings(BaseSettings): """Application settings.""" DATABASE_URL: str SECRET_KEY: str ACCESS_TOKEN_EXPIRE_MINUTES: int = 30 API_V1_STR: str = "/api/v1" class Config: env_file = ".env" @lru_cache() def get_settings() -> Settings: return Settings() # core/database.py from sqlalchemy.ext.asyncio import create_async_engine, AsyncSession from sqlalchemy.ext.declarative import declarative_base from sqlalchemy.orm import sessionmaker from app.core.config import get_settings settings = get_settings() engine = create_async_engine( settings.DATABASE_URL, echo=True, future=True ) AsyncSessionLocal = sessionmaker( engine, class_=AsyncSession, expire_on_commit=False ) Base = declarative_base() async def get_db() -> AsyncSession: """Dependency for database session.""" async with AsyncSessionLocal() as session: try: yield session await session.commit() except Exception: await session.rollback() raise finally: await session.close() ``` ### Pattern 2: CRUD Repository Pattern ```python # repositories/base_repository.py from typing import Generic, TypeVar, Type, Optional, List from sqlalchemy.ext.asyncio import AsyncSession from sqlalchemy import select from pydantic import BaseModel ModelType = TypeVar("ModelType") CreateSchemaType = TypeVar("CreateSchemaType", bound=BaseModel) UpdateSchemaType = TypeVar("UpdateSchemaType", bound=BaseModel) class BaseRepository(Generic[ModelType, CreateSchemaType, UpdateSchemaType]): """Base repository for CRUD operations.""" def __init__(self, model: Type[ModelType]): self.model = model async def get(self, db: AsyncSession, id: int) -> Optional[ModelType]: """Get by ID.""" result = await db.execute( select(self.model).where(self.model.id == id) ) return result.scalars().first() async def get_multi( self, db: AsyncSession, skip: int = 0, limit: int = 100 ) -> List[ModelType]: """Get multiple records.""" result = await db.execute( select(self.model).offset(skip).limit(limit) ) return result.scalars().all() async def create( self, db: AsyncSession, obj_in: CreateSchemaType ) -> ModelType: """Create new record.""" db_obj = self.model(**obj_in.dict()) db.add(db_obj) await db.flush() await db.refresh(db_obj) return db_obj async def update( self, db: AsyncSession, db_obj: ModelType, obj_in: UpdateSchemaType ) -> ModelType: """Update record.""" update_data = obj_in.dict(exclude_unset=True) for field, value in update_data.items(): setattr(db_obj, field, value) await db.flush() await db.refresh(db_obj) return db_obj async def delete(self, db: AsyncSession, id: int) -> bool: """Delete record.""" obj = await self.get(db, id) if obj: await db.delete(obj) return True return False # repositories/user_repository.py from app.repositories.base_repository import BaseRepository from app.models.user import User from app.schemas.user import UserCreate, UserUpdate class UserRepository(BaseRepository[User, UserCreate, UserUpdate]): """User-specific repository.""" async def get_by_email(self, db: AsyncSession, email: str) -> Optional[User]: """Get user by email.""" result = await db.execute( select(User).where(User.email == email) ) return result.scalars().first() async def is_active(self, db: AsyncSession, user_id: int) -> bool: """Check if user is active.""" user = await self.get(db, user_id) return user.is_active if user else False user_repository = UserRepository(User) ``` ### Pattern 3: Service Layer ```python # services/user_service.py from typing import Optional from sqlalchemy.ext.asyncio import AsyncSession from app.repositories.user_repository import user_repository from app.schemas.user import UserCreate, UserUpdate, User from app.core.security import get_password_hash, verify_password class UserService: """Business logic for users.""" def __init__(self): self.repository = user_repository async def create_user( self, db: AsyncSession, user_in: UserCreate ) -> User: """Create new user with hashed password.""" # Check if email exists existing = await self.repository.get_by_email(db, user_in.email) if existing: raise ValueError("Email already registered") # Hash password user_in_dict = user_in.dict() user_in_dict["hashed_password"] = get_password_hash(user_in_dict.pop("password")) # Create user user = await self.repository.create(db, UserCreate(**user_in_dict)) return user async def authenticate( self, db: AsyncSession, email: str, password: str ) -> Optional[User]: """Authenticate user.""" user = await self.repository.get_by_email(db, email) if not user: return None if not verify_password(password, user.hashed_password): return None return user async def update_user( self, db: AsyncSession, user_id: int, user_in: UserUpdate ) -> Optional[User]: """Update user.""" user = await self.repository.get(db, user_id) if not user: return None if user_in.password: user_in_dict = user_in.dict(exclude_unset=True) user_in_dict["hashed_password"] = get_password_hash( user_in_dict.pop("password") ) user_in = UserUpdate(**user_in_dict) return await self.repository.update(db, user, user_in) user_service = UserService() ``` ### Pattern 4: API Endpoints with Dependencies ```python # api/v1/endpoints/users.py from fastapi import APIRouter, Depends, HTTPException, status from sqlalchemy.ext.asyncio import AsyncSession from typing import List from app.core.database import get_db from app.schemas.user import User, UserCreate, UserUpdate from app.services.user_service import user_service from app.api.dependencies import get_current_user router = APIRouter() @router.post("/", response_model=User, status_code=status.HTTP_201_CREATED) async def create_user( user_in: UserCreate, db: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db) ): """Create new user.""" try: user = await user_service.create_user(db, user_in) return user except ValueError as e: raise HTTPException(status_code=400, detail=str(e)) @router.get("/me", response_model=User) async def read_current_user( current_user: User = Depends(get_current_user) ): """Get current user.""" return current_user @router.get("/{user_id}", response_model=User) async def read_user( user_id: int, db: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db), current_user: User = Depends(get_current_user) ): """Get user by ID.""" user = await user_service.repository.get(db, user_id) if not user: raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="User not found") return user @router.patch("/{user_id}", response_model=User) async def update_user( user_id: int, user_in: UserUpdate, db: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db), current_user: User = Depends(get_current_user) ): """Update user.""" if current_user.id != user_id: raise HTTPException(status_code=403, detail="Not authorized") user = await user_service.update_user(db, user_id, user_in) if not user: raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="User not found") return user @router.delete("/{user_id}", status_code=status.HTTP_204_NO_CONTENT) async def delete_user( user_id: int, db: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db), current_user: User = Depends(get_current_user) ): """Delete user.""" if current_user.id != user_id: raise HTTPException(status_code=403, detail="Not authorized") deleted = await user_service.repository.delete(db, user_id) if not deleted: raise HTTPException(status_code=404, detail="User not found") ``` ### Pattern 5: Authentication & Authorization ```python # core/security.py from datetime import datetime, timedelta from typing import Optional from jose import JWTError, jwt from passlib.context import CryptContext from app.core.config import get_settings settings = get_settings() pwd_context = CryptContext(schemes=["bcrypt"], deprecated="auto") ALGORITHM = "HS256" def create_access_token(data: dict, expires_delta: Optional[timedelta] = None): """Create JWT access token.""" to_encode = data.copy() if expires_delta: expire = datetime.utcnow() + expires_delta else: expire = datetime.utcnow() + timedelta(minutes=15) to_encode.update({"exp": expire}) encoded_jwt = jwt.encode(to_encode, settings.SECRET_KEY, algorithm=ALGORITHM) return encoded_jwt def verify_password(plain_password: str, hashed_password: str) -> bool: """Verify password against hash.""" return pwd_context.verify(plain_password, hashed_password) def get_password_hash(password: str) -> str: """Hash password.""" return pwd_context.hash(password) # api/dependencies.py from fastapi import Depends, HTTPException, status from fastapi.security import OAuth2PasswordBearer from jose import JWTError, jwt from sqlalchemy.ext.asyncio import AsyncSession from app.core.database import get_db from app.core.security import ALGORITHM from app.core.config import get_settings from app.repositories.user_repository import user_repository oauth2_scheme = OAuth2PasswordBearer(tokenUrl=f"{settings.API_V1_STR}/auth/login") async def get_current_user( db: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db), token: str = Depends(oauth2_scheme) ): """Get current authenticated user.""" credentials_exception = HTTPException( status_code=status.HTTP_401_UNAUTHORIZED, detail="Could not validate credentials", headers={"WWW-Authenticate": "Bearer"}, ) try: payload = jwt.decode(token, settings.SECRET_KEY, algorithms=[ALGORITHM]) user_id: int = payload.get("sub") if user_id is None: raise credentials_exception except JWTError: raise credentials_exception user = await user_repository.get(db, user_id) if user is None: raise credentials_exception return user ``` ## Testing ```python # tests/conftest.py import pytest import asyncio from httpx import AsyncClient from sqlalchemy.ext.asyncio import create_async_engine, AsyncSession from sqlalchemy.orm import sessionmaker from app.main import app from app.core.database import get_db, Base TEST_DATABASE_URL = "sqlite+aiosqlite:///:memory:" @pytest.fixture(scope="session") def event_loop(): loop = asyncio.get_event_loop_policy().new_event_loop() yield loop loop.close() @pytest.fixture async def db_session(): engine = create_async_engine(TEST_DATABASE_URL, echo=True) async with engine.begin() as conn: await conn.run_sync(Base.metadata.create_all) AsyncSessionLocal = sessionmaker( engine, class_=AsyncSession, expire_on_commit=False ) async with AsyncSessionLocal() as session: yield session @pytest.fixture async def client(db_session): async def override_get_db(): yield db_session app.dependency_overrides[get_db] = override_get_db async with AsyncClient(app=app, base_url="http://test") as client: yield client # tests/test_users.py import pytest @pytest.mark.asyncio async def test_create_user(client): response = await client.post( "/api/v1/users/", json={ "email": "test@example.com", "password": "testpass123", "name": "Test User" } ) assert response.status_code == 201 data = response.json() assert data["email"] == "test@example.com" assert "id" in data ``` ## Resources - **references/fastapi-architecture.md**: Detailed architecture guide - **references/async-best-practices.md**: Async/await patterns - **references/testing-strategies.md**: Comprehensive testing guide - **assets/project-template/**: Complete FastAPI project - **assets/docker-compose.yml**: Development environment setup ## Best Practices 1. **Async All The Way**: Use async for database, external APIs 2. **Dependency Injection**: Leverage FastAPI's DI system 3. **Repository Pattern**: Separate data access from business logic 4. **Service Layer**: Keep business logic out of routes 5. **Pydantic Schemas**: Strong typing for request/response 6. **Error Handling**: Consistent error responses 7. **Testing**: Test all layers independently ## Common Pitfalls - **Blocking Code in Async**: Using synchronous database drivers - **No Service Layer**: Business logic in route handlers - **Missing Type Hints**: Loses FastAPI's benefits - **Ignoring Sessions**: Not properly managing database sessions - **No Testing**: Skipping integration tests - **Tight Coupling**: Direct database access in routes
👍0
👁️0
🤖 Auto-discovered
🤖system prompt•7 months ago

temporal-python-testing

Test Temporal workflows with pytest, time-skipping, and mocking

coding
⭐1
# Temporal Python Testing Strategies Comprehensive testing approaches for Temporal workflows using pytest, progressive disclosure resources for specific testing scenarios. ## When to Use This Skill - **Unit testing workflows** - Fast tests with time-skipping - **Integration testing** - Workflows with mocked activities - **Replay testing** - Validate determinism against production histories - **Local development** - Set up Temporal server and pytest - **CI/CD integration** - Automated testing pipelines - **Coverage strategies** - Achieve ≥80% test coverage ## Testing Philosophy **Recommended Approach** (Source: docs.temporal.io/develop/python/testing-suite): - Write majority as integration tests - Use pytest with async fixtures - Time-skipping enables fast feedback (month-long workflows → seconds) - Mock activities to isolate workflow logic - Validate determinism with replay testing **Three Test Types**: 1. **Unit**: Workflows with time-skipping, activities with ActivityEnvironment 2. **Integration**: Workers with mocked activities 3. **End-to-end**: Full Temporal server with real activities (use sparingly) ## Available Resources This skill provides detailed guidance through progressive disclosure. Load specific resources based on your testing needs: ### Unit Testing Resources **File**: `resources/unit-testing.md` **When to load**: Testing individual workflows or activities in isolation **Contains**: - WorkflowEnvironment with time-skipping - ActivityEnvironment for activity testing - Fast execution of long-running workflows - Manual time advancement patterns - pytest fixtures and patterns ### Integration Testing Resources **File**: `resources/integration-testing.md` **When to load**: Testing workflows with mocked external dependencies **Contains**: - Activity mocking strategies - Error injection patterns - Multi-activity workflow testing - Signal and query testing - Coverage strategies ### Replay Testing Resources **File**: `resources/replay-testing.md` **When to load**: Validating determinism or deploying workflow changes **Contains**: - Determinism validation - Production history replay - CI/CD integration patterns - Version compatibility testing ### Local Development Resources **File**: `resources/local-setup.md` **When to load**: Setting up development environment **Contains**: - Docker Compose configuration - pytest setup and configuration - Coverage tool integration - Development workflow ## Quick Start Guide ### Basic Workflow Test ```python import pytest from temporalio.testing import WorkflowEnvironment from temporalio.worker import Worker @pytest.fixture async def workflow_env(): env = await WorkflowEnvironment.start_time_skipping() yield env await env.shutdown() @pytest.mark.asyncio async def test_workflow(workflow_env): async with Worker( workflow_env.client, task_queue="test-queue", workflows=[YourWorkflow], activities=[your_activity], ): result = await workflow_env.client.execute_workflow( YourWorkflow.run, args, id="test-wf-id", task_queue="test-queue", ) assert result == expected ``` ### Basic Activity Test ```python from temporalio.testing import ActivityEnvironment async def test_activity(): env = ActivityEnvironment() result = await env.run(your_activity, "test-input") assert result == expected_output ``` ## Coverage Targets **Recommended Coverage** (Source: docs.temporal.io best practices): - **Workflows**: ≥80% logic coverage - **Activities**: ≥80% logic coverage - **Integration**: Critical paths with mocked activities - **Replay**: All workflow versions before deployment ## Key Testing Principles 1. **Time-Skipping** - Month-long workflows test in seconds 2. **Mock Activities** - Isolate workflow logic from external dependencies 3. **Replay Testing** - Validate determinism before deployment 4. **High Coverage** - ≥80% target for production workflows 5. **Fast Feedback** - Unit tests run in milliseconds ## How to Use Resources **Load specific resource when needed**: - "Show me unit testing patterns" → Load `resources/unit-testing.md` - "How do I mock activities?" → Load `resources/integration-testing.md` - "Setup local Temporal server" → Load `resources/local-setup.md` - "Validate determinism" → Load `resources/replay-testing.md` ## Additional References - Python SDK Testing: docs.temporal.io/develop/python/testing-suite - Testing Patterns: github.com/temporalio/temporal/blob/main/docs/development/testing.md - Python Samples: github.com/temporalio/samples-python
👍0
👁️0
🤖 Auto-discovered
🤖system prompt•7 months ago

workflow-orchestration-patterns

Design durable workflows with Temporal for distributed systems.

coding
⭐1
# Workflow Orchestration Patterns Master workflow orchestration architecture with Temporal, covering fundamental design decisions, resilience patterns, and best practices for building reliable distributed systems. ## When to Use Workflow Orchestration ### Ideal Use Cases (Source: docs.temporal.io) - **Multi-step processes** spanning machines/services/databases - **Distributed transactions** requiring all-or-nothing semantics - **Long-running workflows** (hours to years) with automatic state persistence - **Failure recovery** that must resume from last successful step - **Business processes**: bookings, orders, campaigns, approvals - **Entity lifecycle management**: inventory tracking, account management, cart workflows - **Infrastructure automation**: CI/CD pipelines, provisioning, deployments - **Human-in-the-loop** systems requiring timeouts and escalations ### When NOT to Use - Simple CRUD operations (use direct API calls) - Pure data processing pipelines (use Airflow, batch processing) - Stateless request/response (use standard APIs) - Real-time streaming (use Kafka, event processors) ## Critical Design Decision: Workflows vs Activities **The Fundamental Rule** (Source: temporal.io/blog/workflow-engine-principles): - **Workflows** = Orchestration logic and decision-making - **Activities** = External interactions (APIs, databases, network calls) ### Workflows (Orchestration) **Characteristics:** - Contain business logic and coordination - **MUST be deterministic** (same inputs → same outputs) - **Cannot** perform direct external calls - State automatically preserved across failures - Can run for years despite infrastructure failures **Example workflow tasks:** - Decide which steps to execute - Handle compensation logic - Manage timeouts and retries - Coordinate child workflows ### Activities (External Interactions) **Characteristics:** - Handle all external system interactions - Can be non-deterministic (API calls, DB writes) - Include built-in timeouts and retry logic - **Must be idempotent** (calling N times = calling once) - Short-lived (seconds to minutes typically) **Example activity tasks:** - Call payment gateway API - Write to database - Send emails or notifications - Query external services ### Design Decision Framework ``` Does it touch external systems? → Activity Is it orchestration/decision logic? → Workflow ``` ## Core Workflow Patterns ### 1. Saga Pattern with Compensation **Purpose**: Implement distributed transactions with rollback capability **Pattern** (Source: temporal.io/blog/compensating-actions-part-of-a-complete-breakfast-with-sagas): ``` For each step: 1. Register compensation BEFORE executing 2. Execute the step (via activity) 3. On failure, run all compensations in reverse order (LIFO) ``` **Example: Payment Workflow** 1. Reserve inventory (compensation: release inventory) 2. Charge payment (compensation: refund payment) 3. Fulfill order (compensation: cancel fulfillment) **Critical Requirements:** - Compensations must be idempotent - Register compensation BEFORE executing step - Run compensations in reverse order - Handle partial failures gracefully ### 2. Entity Workflows (Actor Model) **Purpose**: Long-lived workflow representing single entity instance **Pattern** (Source: docs.temporal.io/evaluate/use-cases-design-patterns): - One workflow execution = one entity (cart, account, inventory item) - Workflow persists for entity lifetime - Receives signals for state changes - Supports queries for current state **Example Use Cases:** - Shopping cart (add items, checkout, expiration) - Bank account (deposits, withdrawals, balance checks) - Product inventory (stock updates, reservations) **Benefits:** - Encapsulates entity behavior - Guarantees consistency per entity - Natural event sourcing ### 3. Fan-Out/Fan-In (Parallel Execution) **Purpose**: Execute multiple tasks in parallel, aggregate results **Pattern:** - Spawn child workflows or parallel activities - Wait for all to complete - Aggregate results - Handle partial failures **Scaling Rule** (Source: temporal.io/blog/workflow-engine-principles): - Don't scale individual workflows - For 1M tasks: spawn 1K child workflows × 1K tasks each - Keep each workflow bounded ### 4. Async Callback Pattern **Purpose**: Wait for external event or human approval **Pattern:** - Workflow sends request and waits for signal - External system processes asynchronously - Sends signal to resume workflow - Workflow continues with response **Use Cases:** - Human approval workflows - Webhook callbacks - Long-running external processes ## State Management and Determinism ### Automatic State Preservation **How Temporal Works** (Source: docs.temporal.io/workflows): - Complete program state preserved automatically - Event History records every command and event - Seamless recovery from crashes - Applications restore pre-failure state ### Determinism Constraints **Workflows Execute as State Machines**: - Replay behavior must be consistent - Same inputs → identical outputs every time **Prohibited in Workflows** (Source: docs.temporal.io/workflows): - ❌ Threading, locks, synchronization primitives - ❌ Random number generation (`random()`) - ❌ Global state or static variables - ❌ System time (`datetime.now()`) - ❌ Direct file I/O or network calls - ❌ Non-deterministic libraries **Allowed in Workflows**: - ✅ `workflow.now()` (deterministic time) - ✅ `workflow.random()` (deterministic random) - ✅ Pure functions and calculations - ✅ Calling activities (non-deterministic operations) ### Versioning Strategies **Challenge**: Changing workflow code while old executions still running **Solutions**: 1. **Versioning API**: Use `workflow.get_version()` for safe changes 2. **New Workflow Type**: Create new workflow, route new executions to it 3. **Backward Compatibility**: Ensure old events replay correctly ## Resilience and Error Handling ### Retry Policies **Default Behavior**: Temporal retries activities forever **Configure Retry**: - Initial retry interval - Backoff coefficient (exponential backoff) - Maximum interval (cap retry delay) - Maximum attempts (eventually fail) **Non-Retryable Errors**: - Invalid input (validation failures) - Business rule violations - Permanent failures (resource not found) ### Idempotency Requirements **Why Critical** (Source: docs.temporal.io/activities): - Activities may execute multiple times - Network failures trigger retries - Duplicate execution must be safe **Implementation Strategies**: - Idempotency keys (deduplication) - Check-then-act with unique constraints - Upsert operations instead of insert - Track processed request IDs ### Activity Heartbeats **Purpose**: Detect stalled long-running activities **Pattern**: - Activity sends periodic heartbeat - Includes progress information - Timeout if no heartbeat received - Enables progress-based retry ## Best Practices ### Workflow Design 1. **Keep workflows focused** - Single responsibility per workflow 2. **Small workflows** - Use child workflows for scalability 3. **Clear boundaries** - Workflow orchestrates, activities execute 4. **Test locally** - Use time-skipping test environment ### Activity Design 1. **Idempotent operations** - Safe to retry 2. **Short-lived** - Seconds to minutes, not hours 3. **Timeout configuration** - Always set timeouts 4. **Heartbeat for long tasks** - Report progress 5. **Error handling** - Distinguish retryable vs non-retryable ### Common Pitfalls **Workflow Violations**: - Using `datetime.now()` instead of `workflow.now()` - Threading or async operations in workflow code - Calling external APIs directly from workflow - Non-deterministic logic in workflows **Activity Mistakes**: - Non-idempotent operations (can't handle retries) - Missing timeouts (activities run forever) - No error classification (retry validation errors) - Ignoring payload limits (2MB per argument) ### Operational Considerations **Monitoring**: - Workflow execution duration - Activity failure rates - Retry attempts and backoff - Pending workflow counts **Scalability**: - Horizontal scaling with workers - Task queue partitioning - Child workflow decomposition - Activity batching when appropriate ## Additional Resources **Official Documentation**: - Temporal Core Concepts: docs.temporal.io/workflows - Workflow Patterns: docs.temporal.io/evaluate/use-cases-design-patterns - Best Practices: docs.temporal.io/develop/best-practices - Saga Pattern: temporal.io/blog/saga-pattern-made-easy **Key Principles**: 1. Workflows = orchestration, Activities = external calls 2. Determinism is non-negotiable for workflows 3. Idempotency is critical for activities 4. State preservation is automatic 5. Design for failure and recovery
👍0
👁️0
🤖 Auto-discovered
🤖system prompt•7 months ago

deployment-pipeline-design

Design multi-stage CI/CD pipelines with approval gates, security

coding
⭐1
# Deployment Pipeline Design Architecture patterns for multi-stage CI/CD pipelines with approval gates and deployment strategies. ## Purpose Design robust, secure deployment pipelines that balance speed with safety through proper stage organization and approval workflows. ## When to Use - Design CI/CD architecture - Implement deployment gates - Configure multi-environment pipelines - Establish deployment best practices - Implement progressive delivery ## Pipeline Stages ### Standard Pipeline Flow ``` ┌─────────┐ ┌──────┐ ┌─────────┐ ┌────────┐ ┌──────────┐ │ Build │ → │ Test │ → │ Staging │ → │ Approve│ → │Production│ └─────────┘ └──────┘ └─────────┘ └────────┘ └──────────┘ ``` ### Detailed Stage Breakdown 1. **Source** - Code checkout 2. **Build** - Compile, package, containerize 3. **Test** - Unit, integration, security scans 4. **Staging Deploy** - Deploy to staging environment 5. **Integration Tests** - E2E, smoke tests 6. **Approval Gate** - Manual approval required 7. **Production Deploy** - Canary, blue-green, rolling 8. **Verification** - Health checks, monitoring 9. **Rollback** - Automated rollback on failure ## Approval Gate Patterns ### Pattern 1: Manual Approval ```yaml # GitHub Actions production-deploy: needs: staging-deploy environment: name: production url: https://app.example.com runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - name: Deploy to production run: | # Deployment commands ``` ### Pattern 2: Time-Based Approval ```yaml # GitLab CI deploy:production: stage: deploy script: - deploy.sh production environment: name: production when: delayed start_in: 30 minutes only: - main ``` ### Pattern 3: Multi-Approver ```yaml # Azure Pipelines stages: - stage: Production dependsOn: Staging jobs: - deployment: Deploy environment: name: production resourceType: Kubernetes strategy: runOnce: preDeploy: steps: - task: ManualValidation@0 inputs: notifyUsers: "team-leads@example.com" instructions: "Review staging metrics before approving" ``` **Reference:** See `assets/approval-gate-template.yml` ## Deployment Strategies ### 1. Rolling Deployment ```yaml apiVersion: apps/v1 kind: Deployment metadata: name: my-app spec: replicas: 10 strategy: type: RollingUpdate rollingUpdate: maxSurge: 2 maxUnavailable: 1 ``` **Characteristics:** - Gradual rollout - Zero downtime - Easy rollback - Best for most applications ### 2. Blue-Green Deployment ```yaml # Blue (current) kubectl apply -f blue-deployment.yaml kubectl label service my-app version=blue # Green (new) kubectl apply -f green-deployment.yaml # Test green environment kubectl label service my-app version=green # Rollback if needed kubectl label service my-app version=blue ``` **Characteristics:** - Instant switchover - Easy rollback - Doubles infrastructure cost temporarily - Good for high-risk deployments ### 3. Canary Deployment ```yaml apiVersion: argoproj.io/v1alpha1 kind: Rollout metadata: name: my-app spec: replicas: 10 strategy: canary: steps: - setWeight: 10 - pause: { duration: 5m } - setWeight: 25 - pause: { duration: 5m } - setWeight: 50 - pause: { duration: 5m } - setWeight: 100 ``` **Characteristics:** - Gradual traffic shift - Risk mitigation - Real user testing - Requires service mesh or similar ### 4. Feature Flags ```python from flagsmith import Flagsmith flagsmith = Flagsmith(environment_key="API_KEY") if flagsmith.has_feature("new_checkout_flow"): # New code path process_checkout_v2() else: # Existing code path process_checkout_v1() ``` **Characteristics:** - Deploy without releasing - A/B testing - Instant rollback - Granular control ## Pipeline Orchestration ### Multi-Stage Pipeline Example ```yaml name: Production Pipeline on: push: branches: [main] jobs: build: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - name: Build application run: make build - name: Build Docker image run: docker build -t myapp:${{ github.sha }} . - name: Push to registry run: docker push myapp:${{ github.sha }} test: needs: build runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - name: Unit tests run: make test - name: Security scan run: trivy image myapp:${{ github.sha }} deploy-staging: needs: test runs-on: ubuntu-latest environment: name: staging steps: - name: Deploy to staging run: kubectl apply -f k8s/staging/ integration-test: needs: deploy-staging runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - name: Run E2E tests run: npm run test:e2e deploy-production: needs: integration-test runs-on: ubuntu-latest environment: name: production steps: - name: Canary deployment run: | kubectl apply -f k8s/production/ kubectl argo rollouts promote my-app verify: needs: deploy-production runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - name: Health check run: curl -f https://app.example.com/health - name: Notify team run: | curl -X POST ${{ secrets.SLACK_WEBHOOK }} \ -d '{"text":"Production deployment successful!"}' ``` ## Pipeline Best Practices 1. **Fail fast** - Run quick tests first 2. **Parallel execution** - Run independent jobs concurrently 3. **Caching** - Cache dependencies between runs 4. **Artifact management** - Store build artifacts 5. **Environment parity** - Keep environments consistent 6. **Secrets management** - Use secret stores (Vault, etc.) 7. **Deployment windows** - Schedule deployments appropriately 8. **Monitoring integration** - Track deployment metrics 9. **Rollback automation** - Auto-rollback on failures 10. **Documentation** - Document pipeline stages ## Rollback Strategies ### Automated Rollback ```yaml deploy-and-verify: steps: - name: Deploy new version run: kubectl apply -f k8s/ - name: Wait for rollout run: kubectl rollout status deployment/my-app - name: Health check id: health run: | for i in {1..10}; do if curl -sf https://app.example.com/health; then exit 0 fi sleep 10 done exit 1 - name: Rollback on failure if: failure() run: kubectl rollout undo deployment/my-app ``` ### Manual Rollback ```bash # List revision history kubectl rollout history deployment/my-app # Rollback to previous version kubectl rollout undo deployment/my-app # Rollback to specific revision kubectl rollout undo deployment/my-app --to-revision=3 ``` ## Monitoring and Metrics ### Key Pipeline Metrics - **Deployment Frequency** - How often deployments occur - **Lead Time** - Time from commit to production - **Change Failure Rate** - Percentage of failed deployments - **Mean Time to Recovery (MTTR)** - Time to recover from failure - **Pipeline Success Rate** - Percentage of successful runs - **Average Pipeline Duration** - Time to complete pipeline ### Integration with Monitoring ```yaml - name: Post-deployment verification run: | # Wait for metrics stabilization sleep 60 # Check error rate ERROR_RATE=$(curl -s "$PROMETHEUS_URL/api/v1/query?query=rate(http_errors_total[5m])" | jq '.data.result[0].value[1]') if (( $(echo "$ERROR_RATE > 0.01" | bc -l) )); then echo "Error rate too high: $ERROR_RATE" exit 1 fi ``` ## Reference Files - `references/pipeline-orchestration.md` - Complex pipeline patterns - `assets/approval-gate-template.yml` - Approval workflow templates ## Related Skills - `github-actions-templates` - For GitHub Actions implementation - `gitlab-ci-patterns` - For GitLab CI implementation - `secrets-management` - For secrets handling
👍0
👁️0
🤖 Auto-discovered
🤖system prompt•7 months ago

context-driven-development

Creates and maintains project context artifacts (product.md,

coding
⭐1
# Context-Driven Development Guide for implementing and maintaining context as a managed artifact alongside code, enabling consistent AI interactions and team alignment through structured project documentation. ## When to Use This Skill - Setting up new projects with Conductor - Understanding the relationship between context artifacts - Maintaining consistency across AI-assisted development sessions - Onboarding team members to an existing Conductor project - Deciding when to update context documents - Managing greenfield vs brownfield project contexts ## Core Philosophy Context-Driven Development treats project context as a first-class artifact managed alongside code. Instead of relying on ad-hoc prompts or scattered documentation, establish a persistent, structured foundation that informs all AI interactions. Key principles: 1. **Context precedes code**: Define what you're building and how before implementation 2. **Living documentation**: Context artifacts evolve with the project 3. **Single source of truth**: One canonical location for each type of information 4. **AI alignment**: Consistent context produces consistent AI behavior ## The Workflow Follow the **Context → Spec & Plan → Implement** workflow: 1. **Context Phase**: Establish or verify project context artifacts exist and are current 2. **Specification Phase**: Define requirements and acceptance criteria for work units 3. **Planning Phase**: Break specifications into phased, actionable tasks 4. **Implementation Phase**: Execute tasks following established workflow patterns ## Artifact Relationships ### product.md - Defines WHAT and WHY Purpose: Captures product vision, goals, target users, and business context. Contents: - Product name and one-line description - Problem statement and solution approach - Target user personas - Core features and capabilities - Success metrics and KPIs - Product roadmap (high-level) Update when: - Product vision or goals change - New major features are planned - Target audience shifts - Business priorities evolve ### product-guidelines.md - Defines HOW to Communicate Purpose: Establishes brand voice, messaging standards, and communication patterns. Contents: - Brand voice and tone guidelines - Terminology and glossary - Error message conventions - User-facing copy standards - Documentation style Update when: - Brand guidelines change - New terminology is introduced - Communication patterns need refinement ### tech-stack.md - Defines WITH WHAT Purpose: Documents technology choices, dependencies, and architectural decisions. Contents: - Primary languages and frameworks - Key dependencies with versions - Infrastructure and deployment targets - Development tools and environment - Testing frameworks - Code quality tools Update when: - Adding new dependencies - Upgrading major versions - Changing infrastructure - Adopting new tools or patterns ### workflow.md - Defines HOW to Work Purpose: Establishes development practices, quality gates, and team workflows. Contents: - Development methodology (TDD, etc.) - Git workflow and commit conventions - Code review requirements - Testing requirements and coverage targets - Quality assurance gates - Deployment procedures Update when: - Team practices evolve - Quality standards change - New workflow patterns are adopted ### tracks.md - Tracks WHAT'S HAPPENING Purpose: Registry of all work units with status and metadata. Contents: - Active tracks with current status - Completed tracks with completion dates - Track metadata (type, priority, assignee) - Links to individual track directories Update when: - New tracks are created - Track status changes - Tracks are completed or archived See [references/artifact-templates.md](references/artifact-templates.md) for copy-paste starter templates. ## Context Maintenance Principles ### Keep Artifacts Synchronized Ensure changes in one artifact reflect in related documents: - New feature in product.md → Update tech-stack.md if new dependencies needed - Completed track → Update product.md to reflect new capabilities - Workflow change → Update all affected track plans ### Update tech-stack.md When Adding Dependencies Before adding any new dependency: 1. Check if existing dependencies solve the need 2. Document the rationale for new dependencies 3. Add version constraints 4. Note any configuration requirements ### Update product.md When Features Complete After completing a feature track: 1. Move feature from "planned" to "implemented" in product.md 2. Update any affected success metrics 3. Document any scope changes from original plan ### Verify Context Before Implementation Before starting any track: 1. Read all context artifacts 2. Flag any outdated information 3. Propose updates before proceeding 4. Confirm context accuracy with stakeholders ## Greenfield vs Brownfield Handling ### Greenfield Projects (New) For new projects: 1. Run `/conductor:setup` to create all artifacts interactively 2. Answer questions about product vision, tech preferences, and workflow 3. Generate initial style guides for chosen languages 4. Create empty tracks registry Characteristics: - Full control over context structure - Define standards before code exists - Establish patterns early ### Brownfield Projects (Existing) For existing codebases: 1. Run `/conductor:setup` with existing codebase detection 2. System analyzes existing code, configs, and documentation 3. Pre-populate artifacts based on discovered patterns 4. Review and refine generated context Characteristics: - Extract implicit context from existing code - Reconcile existing patterns with desired patterns - Document technical debt and modernization plans - Preserve working patterns while establishing standards ## Benefits ### Team Alignment - New team members onboard faster with explicit context - Consistent terminology and conventions across the team - Shared understanding of product goals and technical decisions ### AI Consistency - AI assistants produce aligned outputs across sessions - Reduced need to re-explain context in each interaction - Predictable behavior based on documented standards ### Institutional Memory - Decisions and rationale are preserved - Context survives team changes - Historical context informs future decisions ### Quality Assurance - Standards are explicit and verifiable - Deviations from context are detectable - Quality gates are documented and enforceable ## Directory Structure ``` conductor/ ├── index.md # Navigation hub linking all artifacts ├── product.md # Product vision and goals ├── product-guidelines.md # Communication standards ├── tech-stack.md # Technology preferences ├── workflow.md # Development practices ├── tracks.md # Work unit registry ├── setup_state.json # Resumable setup state ├── code_styleguides/ # Language-specific conventions │ ├── python.md │ ├── typescript.md │ └── ... └── tracks/ └── <track-id>/ ├── spec.md ├── plan.md ├── metadata.json └── index.md ``` ## Context Lifecycle 1. **Creation**: Initial setup via `/conductor:setup` 2. **Validation**: Verify before each track 3. **Evolution**: Update as project grows 4. **Synchronization**: Keep artifacts aligned 5. **Archival**: Document historical decisions ## Context Validation Checklist Before starting implementation on any track, validate context: ### Product Context - [ ] product.md reflects current product vision - [ ] Target users are accurately described - [ ] Feature list is up to date - [ ] Success metrics are defined ### Technical Context - [ ] tech-stack.md lists all current dependencies - [ ] Version numbers are accurate - [ ] Infrastructure targets are correct - [ ] Development tools are documented ### Workflow Context - [ ] workflow.md describes current practices - [ ] Quality gates are defined - [ ] Coverage targets are specified - [ ] Commit conventions are documented ### Track Context - [ ] tracks.md shows all active work - [ ] No stale or abandoned tracks - [ ] Dependencies between tracks are noted ## Common Anti-Patterns Avoid these context management mistakes: ### Stale Context Problem: Context documents become outdated and misleading. Solution: Update context as part of each track's completion process. ### Context Sprawl Problem: Information scattered across multiple locations. Solution: Use the defined artifact structure; resist creating new document types. ### Implicit Context Problem: Relying on knowledge not captured in artifacts. Solution: If you reference something repeatedly, add it to the appropriate artifact. ### Context Hoarding Problem: One person maintains context without team input. Solution: Review context artifacts in pull requests; make updates collaborative. ### Over-Specification Problem: Context becomes so detailed it's impossible to maintain. Solution: Keep artifacts focused on decisions that affect AI behavior and team alignment. ## Integration with Development Tools ### IDE Integration Configure your IDE to display context files prominently: - Pin conductor/product.md for quick reference - Add tech-stack.md to project notes - Create snippets for common patterns from style guides ### Git Hooks Consider pre-commit hooks that: - Warn when dependencies change without tech-stack.md update - Remind to update product.md when feature branches merge - Validate context artifact syntax ### CI/CD Integration Include context validation in pipelines: - Check tech-stack.md matches actual dependencies - Verify links in context documents resolve - Ensure tracks.md status matches git branch state ## Session Continuity Conductor supports multi-session development through context persistence: ### Starting a New Session 1. Read index.md to orient yourself 2. Check tracks.md for active work 3. Review relevant track's plan.md for current task 4. Verify context artifacts are current ### Ending a Session 1. Update plan.md with current progress 2. Note any blockers or decisions made 3. Commit in-progress work with clear status 4. Update tracks.md if status changed ### Handling Interruptions If interrupted mid-task: 1. Mark task as `[~]` with note about stopping point 2. Commit work-in-progress to feature branch 3. Document any uncommitted decisions in plan.md ## Best Practices 1. **Read context first**: Always read relevant artifacts before starting work 2. **Small updates**: Make incremental context changes, not massive rewrites 3. **Link decisions**: Reference context when making implementation choices 4. **Version context**: Commit context changes alongside code changes 5. **Review context**: Include context artifact reviews in code reviews 6. **Validate regularly**: Run context validation checklist before major work 7. **Communicate changes**: Notify team when context artifacts change significantly 8. **Preserve history**: Use git to track context evolution over time 9. **Question staleness**: If context feels wrong, investigate and update 10. **Keep it actionable**: Every context item should inform a decision or behavior
👍0
👁️0
🤖 Auto-discovered
🤖system prompt•7 months ago

track-management

Use this skill when creating, managing, or working with Conductor

coding
⭐1
# Track Management Guide for creating, managing, and completing Conductor tracks - the logical work units that organize features, bugs, and refactors through specification, planning, and implementation phases. ## When to Use This Skill - Creating new feature, bug, or refactor tracks - Writing or reviewing spec.md files - Creating or updating plan.md files - Managing track lifecycle from creation to completion - Understanding track status markers and conventions - Working with the tracks.md registry - Interpreting or updating track metadata ## Track Concept A track is a logical work unit that encapsulates a complete piece of work. Each track has: - A unique identifier - A specification defining requirements - A phased plan breaking work into tasks - Metadata tracking status and progress Tracks provide semantic organization for work, enabling: - Clear scope boundaries - Progress tracking - Git-aware operations (revert by track) - Team coordination ## Track Types ### feature New functionality or capabilities. Use for: - New user-facing features - New API endpoints - New integrations - Significant enhancements ### bug Defect fixes. Use for: - Incorrect behavior - Error conditions - Performance regressions - Security vulnerabilities ### chore Maintenance and housekeeping. Use for: - Dependency updates - Configuration changes - Documentation updates - Cleanup tasks ### refactor Code improvement without behavior change. Use for: - Code restructuring - Pattern adoption - Technical debt reduction - Performance optimization (same behavior, better performance) ## Track ID Format Track IDs follow the pattern: `{shortname}_{YYYYMMDD}` - **shortname**: 2-4 word kebab-case description (e.g., `user-auth`, `api-rate-limit`) - **YYYYMMDD**: Creation date in ISO format Examples: - `user-auth_20250115` - `fix-login-error_20250115` - `upgrade-deps_20250115` - `refactor-api-client_20250115` ## Track Lifecycle ### 1. Creation (newTrack) **Define Requirements** 1. Gather requirements through interactive Q&A 2. Identify acceptance criteria 3. Determine scope boundaries 4. Identify dependencies **Generate Specification** 1. Create `spec.md` with structured requirements 2. Document functional and non-functional requirements 3. Define acceptance criteria 4. List dependencies and constraints **Generate Plan** 1. Create `plan.md` with phased task breakdown 2. Organize tasks into logical phases 3. Add verification tasks after phases 4. Estimate effort and complexity **Register Track** 1. Add entry to `tracks.md` registry 2. Create track directory structure 3. Generate `metadata.json` 4. Create track `index.md` ### 2. Implementation **Execute Tasks** 1. Select next pending task from plan 2. Mark task as in-progress 3. Implement following workflow (TDD) 4. Mark task complete with commit SHA **Update Status** 1. Update task markers in plan.md 2. Record commit SHAs for traceability 3. Update phase progress 4. Update track status in tracks.md **Verify Progress** 1. Complete verification tasks 2. Wait for checkpoint approval 3. Record checkpoint commits ### 3. Completion **Sync Documentation** 1. Update product.md if features added 2. Update tech-stack.md if dependencies changed 3. Verify all acceptance criteria met **Archive or Delete** 1. Mark track as completed in tracks.md 2. Record completion date 3. Archive or retain track directory ## Specification (spec.md) Structure ```markdown # {Track Title} ## Overview Brief description of what this track accomplishes and why. ## Functional Requirements ### FR-1: {Requirement Name} Description of the functional requirement. - Acceptance: How to verify this requirement is met ### FR-2: {Requirement Name} ... ## Non-Functional Requirements ### NFR-1: {Requirement Name} Description of the non-functional requirement (performance, security, etc.) - Target: Specific measurable target - Verification: How to test ## Acceptance Criteria - [ ] Criterion 1: Specific, testable condition - [ ] Criterion 2: Specific, testable condition - [ ] Criterion 3: Specific, testable condition ## Scope ### In Scope - Explicitly included items - Features to implement - Components to modify ### Out of Scope - Explicitly excluded items - Future considerations - Related but separate work ## Dependencies ### Internal - Other tracks or components this depends on - Required context artifacts ### External - Third-party services or APIs - External dependencies ## Risks and Mitigations | Risk | Impact | Mitigation | | ---------------- | --------------- | ------------------- | | Risk description | High/Medium/Low | Mitigation strategy | ## Open Questions - [ ] Question that needs resolution - [x] Resolved question - Answer ``` ## Plan (plan.md) Structure ```markdown # Implementation Plan: {Track Title} Track ID: `{track-id}` Created: YYYY-MM-DD Status: pending | in-progress | completed ## Overview Brief description of implementation approach. ## Phase 1: {Phase Name} ### Tasks - [ ] **Task 1.1**: Task description - Sub-task or detail - Sub-task or detail - [ ] **Task 1.2**: Task description - [ ] **Task 1.3**: Task description ### Verification - [ ] **Verify 1.1**: Verification step for phase ## Phase 2: {Phase Name} ### Tasks - [ ] **Task 2.1**: Task description - [ ] **Task 2.2**: Task description ### Verification - [ ] **Verify 2.1**: Verification step for phase ## Phase 3: Finalization ### Tasks - [ ] **Task 3.1**: Update documentation - [ ] **Task 3.2**: Final integration test ### Verification - [ ] **Verify 3.1**: All acceptance criteria met ## Checkpoints | Phase | Checkpoint SHA | Date | Status | | ------- | -------------- | ---- | ------- | | Phase 1 | | | pending | | Phase 2 | | | pending | | Phase 3 | | | pending | ``` ## Status Marker Conventions Use consistent markers in plan.md: | Marker | Meaning | Usage | | ------ | ----------- | --------------------------- | | `[ ]` | Pending | Task not started | | `[~]` | In Progress | Currently being worked | | `[x]` | Complete | Task finished (include SHA) | | `[-]` | Skipped | Intentionally not done | | `[!]` | Blocked | Waiting on dependency | Example: ```markdown - [x] **Task 1.1**: Set up database schema `abc1234` - [~] **Task 1.2**: Implement user model - [ ] **Task 1.3**: Add validation logic - [!] **Task 1.4**: Integrate auth service (blocked: waiting for API key) - [-] **Task 1.5**: Legacy migration (skipped: not needed) ``` ## Track Registry (tracks.md) Format ```markdown # Track Registry ## Active Tracks | Track ID | Type | Status | Phase | Started | Assignee | | ------------------------------------------------ | ------- | ----------- | ----- | ---------- | ---------- | | [user-auth_20250115](tracks/user-auth_20250115/) | feature | in-progress | 2/3 | 2025-01-15 | @developer | | [fix-login_20250114](tracks/fix-login_20250114/) | bug | pending | 0/2 | 2025-01-14 | - | ## Completed Tracks | Track ID | Type | Completed | Duration | | ---------------------------------------------- | ----- | ---------- | -------- | | [setup-ci_20250110](tracks/setup-ci_20250110/) | chore | 2025-01-12 | 2 days | ## Archived Tracks | Track ID | Reason | Archived | | ---------------------------------------------------- | ---------- | ---------- | | [old-feature_20241201](tracks/old-feature_20241201/) | Superseded | 2025-01-05 | ``` ## Metadata (metadata.json) Fields ```json { "id": "user-auth_20250115", "title": "User Authentication System", "type": "feature", "status": "in-progress", "priority": "high", "created": "2025-01-15T10:30:00Z", "updated": "2025-01-15T14:45:00Z", "started": "2025-01-15T11:00:00Z", "completed": null, "assignee": "@developer", "phases": { "total": 3, "current": 2, "completed": 1 }, "tasks": { "total": 12, "completed": 5, "in_progress": 1, "pending": 6 }, "checkpoints": [ { "phase": 1, "sha": "abc1234", "date": "2025-01-15T13:00:00Z" } ], "dependencies": [], "tags": ["auth", "security"] } ``` ## Track Operations ### Creating a Track 1. Run `/conductor:new-track` 2. Answer interactive questions 3. Review generated spec.md 4. Review generated plan.md 5. Confirm track creation ### Starting Implementation 1. Read spec.md and plan.md 2. Verify context artifacts are current 3. Mark first task as `[~]` 4. Begin TDD workflow ### Completing a Phase 1. Ensure all phase tasks are `[x]` 2. Complete verification tasks 3. Wait for checkpoint approval 4. Record checkpoint SHA 5. Proceed to next phase ### Completing a Track 1. Verify all phases complete 2. Verify all acceptance criteria met 3. Update product.md if needed 4. Mark track completed in tracks.md 5. Update metadata.json ### Reverting a Track 1. Run `/conductor:revert` 2. Select track to revert 3. Choose granularity (track/phase/task) 4. Confirm revert operation 5. Update status markers ## Handling Track Dependencies ### Identifying Dependencies During track creation, identify: - **Hard dependencies**: Must complete before this track can start - **Soft dependencies**: Can proceed in parallel but may affect integration - **External dependencies**: Third-party services, APIs, or team decisions ### Documenting Dependencies In spec.md, list dependencies with: - Dependency type (hard/soft/external) - Current status (available/pending/blocked) - Resolution path (what needs to happen) ### Managing Blocked Tracks When a track is blocked: 1. Mark blocked tasks with `[!]` and reason 2. Update tracks.md status 3. Document blocker in metadata.json 4. Consider creating dependency track if needed ## Track Sizing Guidelines ### Right-Sized Tracks Aim for tracks that: - Complete in 1-5 days of work - Have 2-4 phases - Contain 8-20 tasks total - Deliver a coherent, testable unit ### Too Large Signs a track is too large: - More than 5 phases - More than 25 tasks - Multiple unrelated features - Estimated duration > 1 week Solution: Split into multiple tracks with clear boundaries. ### Too Small Signs a track is too small: - Single phase with 1-2 tasks - No meaningful verification needed - Could be a sub-task of another track - Less than a few hours of work Solution: Combine with related work or handle as part of existing track. ## Specification Quality Checklist Before finalizing spec.md, verify: ### Requirements Quality - [ ] Each requirement has clear acceptance criteria - [ ] Requirements are testable - [ ] Requirements are independent (can verify separately) - [ ] No ambiguous language ("should be fast" → "response < 200ms") ### Scope Clarity - [ ] In-scope items are specific - [ ] Out-of-scope items prevent scope creep - [ ] Boundaries are clear to implementer ### Dependencies Identified - [ ] All internal dependencies listed - [ ] External dependencies have owners/contacts - [ ] Dependency status is current ### Risks Addressed - [ ] Major risks identified - [ ] Impact assessment realistic - [ ] Mitigations are actionable ## Plan Quality Checklist Before starting implementation, verify plan.md: ### Task Quality - [ ] Tasks are atomic (one logical action) - [ ] Tasks are independently verifiable - [ ] Task descriptions are clear - [ ] Sub-tasks provide helpful detail ### Phase Organization - [ ] Phases group related tasks - [ ] Each phase delivers something testable - [ ] Verification tasks after each phase - [ ] Phases build on each other logically ### Completeness - [ ] All spec requirements have corresponding tasks - [ ] Documentation tasks included - [ ] Testing tasks included - [ ] Integration tasks included ## Common Track Patterns ### Feature Track Pattern ``` Phase 1: Foundation - Data models - Database migrations - Basic API structure Phase 2: Core Logic - Business logic implementation - Input validation - Error handling Phase 3: Integration - UI integration - API documentation - End-to-end tests ``` ### Bug Fix Track Pattern ``` Phase 1: Reproduction - Write failing test capturing bug - Document reproduction steps Phase 2: Fix - Implement fix - Verify test passes - Check for regressions Phase 3: Verification - Manual verification - Update documentation if needed ``` ### Refactor Track Pattern ``` Phase 1: Preparation - Add characterization tests - Document current behavior Phase 2: Refactoring - Apply changes incrementally - Maintain green tests throughout Phase 3: Cleanup - Remove dead code - Update documentation ``` ## Best Practices 1. **One track, one concern**: Keep tracks focused on a single logical change 2. **Small phases**: Break work into phases of 3-5 tasks maximum 3. **Verification after phases**: Always include verification tasks 4. **Update markers immediately**: Mark task status as you work 5. **Record SHAs**: Always note commit SHAs for completed tasks 6. **Review specs before planning**: Ensure spec is complete before creating plan 7. **Link dependencies**: Explicitly note track dependencies 8. **Archive, don't delete**: Preserve completed tracks for reference 9. **Size appropriately**: Keep tracks between 1-5 days of work 10. **Clear acceptance criteria**: Every requirement must be testable
👍0
👁️0
🤖 Auto-discovered
🤖system prompt•7 months ago

workflow-patterns

Use this skill when implementing tasks according to Conductor's TDD

coding
⭐1
# Workflow Patterns Guide for implementing tasks using Conductor's TDD workflow, managing phase checkpoints, handling git commits, and executing the verification protocol that ensures quality throughout implementation. ## When to Use This Skill - Implementing tasks from a track's plan.md - Following TDD red-green-refactor cycle - Completing phase checkpoints - Managing git commits and notes - Understanding quality assurance gates - Handling verification protocols - Recording progress in plan files ## TDD Task Lifecycle Follow these 11 steps for each task: ### Step 1: Select Next Task Read plan.md and identify the next pending `[ ]` task. Select tasks in order within the current phase. Do not skip ahead to later phases. ### Step 2: Mark as In Progress Update plan.md to mark the task as `[~]`: ```markdown - [~] **Task 2.1**: Implement user validation ``` Commit this status change separately from implementation. ### Step 3: RED - Write Failing Tests Write tests that define the expected behavior before writing implementation: - Create test file if needed - Write test cases covering happy path - Write test cases covering edge cases - Write test cases covering error conditions - Run tests - they should FAIL Example: ```python def test_validate_user_email_valid(): user = User(email="test@example.com") assert user.validate_email() is True def test_validate_user_email_invalid(): user = User(email="invalid") assert user.validate_email() is False ``` ### Step 4: GREEN - Implement Minimum Code Write the minimum code necessary to make tests pass: - Focus on making tests green, not perfection - Avoid premature optimization - Keep implementation simple - Run tests - they should PASS ### Step 5: REFACTOR - Improve Clarity With green tests, improve the code: - Extract common patterns - Improve naming - Remove duplication - Simplify logic - Run tests after each change - they should remain GREEN ### Step 6: Verify Coverage Check test coverage meets the 80% target: ```bash pytest --cov=module --cov-report=term-missing ``` If coverage is below 80%: - Identify uncovered lines - Add tests for missing paths - Re-run coverage check ### Step 7: Document Deviations If implementation deviated from plan or introduced new dependencies: - Update tech-stack.md with new dependencies - Note deviations in plan.md task comments - Update spec.md if requirements changed ### Step 8: Commit Implementation Create a focused commit for the task: ```bash git add -A git commit -m "feat(user): implement email validation - Add validate_email method to User class - Handle empty and malformed emails - Add comprehensive test coverage Task: 2.1 Track: user-auth_20250115" ``` Commit message format: - Type: feat, fix, refactor, test, docs, chore - Scope: affected module or component - Summary: imperative, present tense - Body: bullet points of changes - Footer: task and track references ### Step 9: Attach Git Notes Add rich task summary as git note: ```bash git notes add -m "Task 2.1: Implement user validation Summary: - Added email validation using regex pattern - Handles edge cases: empty, no @, no domain - Coverage: 94% on validation module Files changed: - src/models/user.py (modified) - tests/test_user.py (modified) Decisions: - Used simple regex over email-validator library - Reason: No external dependency for basic validation" ``` ### Step 10: Update Plan with SHA Update plan.md to mark task complete with commit SHA: ```markdown - [x] **Task 2.1**: Implement user validation `abc1234` ``` ### Step 11: Commit Plan Update Commit the plan status update: ```bash git add conductor/tracks/*/plan.md git commit -m "docs: update plan - task 2.1 complete Track: user-auth_20250115" ``` ## Phase Completion Protocol When all tasks in a phase are complete, execute the verification protocol: ### Identify Changed Files List all files modified since the last checkpoint: ```bash git diff --name-only <last-checkpoint-sha>..HEAD ``` ### Ensure Test Coverage For each modified file: 1. Identify corresponding test file 2. Verify tests exist for new/changed code 3. Run coverage for modified modules 4. Add tests if coverage < 80% ### Run Full Test Suite Execute complete test suite: ```bash pytest -v --tb=short ``` All tests must pass before proceeding. ### Generate Manual Verification Steps Create checklist of manual verifications: ```markdown ## Phase 1 Verification Checklist - [ ] User can register with valid email - [ ] Invalid email shows appropriate error - [ ] Database stores user correctly - [ ] API returns expected response codes ``` ### WAIT for User Approval Present verification checklist to user: ``` Phase 1 complete. Please verify: 1. [ ] Test suite passes (automated) 2. [ ] Coverage meets target (automated) 3. [ ] Manual verification items (requires human) Respond with 'approved' to continue, or note issues. ``` Do NOT proceed without explicit approval. ### Create Checkpoint Commit After approval, create checkpoint commit: ```bash git add -A git commit -m "checkpoint: phase 1 complete - user-auth_20250115 Verified: - All tests passing - Coverage: 87% - Manual verification approved Phase 1 tasks: - [x] Task 1.1: Setup database schema - [x] Task 1.2: Implement user model - [x] Task 1.3: Add validation logic" ``` ### Record Checkpoint SHA Update plan.md checkpoints table: ```markdown ## Checkpoints | Phase | Checkpoint SHA | Date | Status | | ------- | -------------- | ---------- | -------- | | Phase 1 | def5678 | 2025-01-15 | verified | | Phase 2 | | | pending | ``` ## Quality Assurance Gates Before marking any task complete, verify these gates: ### Passing Tests - All existing tests pass - New tests pass - No test regressions ### Coverage >= 80% - New code has 80%+ coverage - Overall project coverage maintained - Critical paths fully covered ### Style Compliance - Code follows style guides - Linting passes - Formatting correct ### Documentation - Public APIs documented - Complex logic explained - README updated if needed ### Type Safety - Type hints present (if applicable) - Type checker passes - No type: ignore without reason ### No Linting Errors - Zero linter errors - Warnings addressed or justified - Static analysis clean ### Mobile Compatibility If applicable: - Responsive design verified - Touch interactions work - Performance acceptable ### Security Audit - No secrets in code - Input validation present - Authentication/authorization correct - Dependencies vulnerability-free ## Git Integration ### Commit Message Format ``` <type>(<scope>): <subject> <body> <footer> ``` Types: - `feat`: New feature - `fix`: Bug fix - `refactor`: Code change without feature/fix - `test`: Adding tests - `docs`: Documentation - `chore`: Maintenance ### Git Notes for Rich Summaries Attach detailed notes to commits: ```bash git notes add -m "<detailed summary>" ``` View notes: ```bash git log --show-notes ``` Benefits: - Preserves context without cluttering commit message - Enables semantic queries across commits - Supports track-based operations ### SHA Recording in plan.md Always record the commit SHA when completing tasks: ```markdown - [x] **Task 1.1**: Setup schema `abc1234` - [x] **Task 1.2**: Add model `def5678` ``` This enables: - Traceability from plan to code - Semantic revert operations - Progress auditing ## Verification Checkpoints ### Why Checkpoints Matter Checkpoints create restore points for semantic reversion: - Revert to end of any phase - Maintain logical code state - Enable safe experimentation ### When to Create Checkpoints Create checkpoint after: - All phase tasks complete - All phase verifications pass - User approval received ### Checkpoint Commit Content Include in checkpoint commit: - All uncommitted changes - Updated plan.md - Updated metadata.json - Any documentation updates ### How to Use Checkpoints For reverting: ```bash # Revert to end of Phase 1 git revert --no-commit <phase-2-commits>... git commit -m "revert: rollback to phase 1 checkpoint" ``` For review: ```bash # See what changed in Phase 2 git diff <phase-1-sha>..<phase-2-sha> ``` ## Handling Deviations During implementation, deviations from the plan may occur. Handle them systematically: ### Types of Deviations **Scope Addition** Discovered requirement not in original spec. - Document in spec.md as new requirement - Add tasks to plan.md - Note addition in task comments **Scope Reduction** Feature deemed unnecessary during implementation. - Mark tasks as `[-]` (skipped) with reason - Update spec.md scope section - Document decision rationale **Technical Deviation** Different implementation approach than planned. - Note deviation in task completion comment - Update tech-stack.md if dependencies changed - Document why original approach was unsuitable **Requirement Change** Understanding of requirement changes during work. - Update spec.md with corrected requirement - Adjust plan.md tasks if needed - Re-verify acceptance criteria ### Deviation Documentation Format When completing a task with deviation: ```markdown - [x] **Task 2.1**: Implement validation `abc1234` - DEVIATION: Used library instead of custom code - Reason: Better edge case handling - Impact: Added email-validator to dependencies ``` ## Error Recovery ### Failed Tests After GREEN If tests fail after reaching GREEN: 1. Do NOT proceed to REFACTOR 2. Identify which test started failing 3. Check if refactoring broke something 4. Revert to last known GREEN state 5. Re-approach the implementation ### Checkpoint Rejection If user rejects a checkpoint: 1. Note rejection reason in plan.md 2. Create tasks to address issues 3. Complete remediation tasks 4. Request checkpoint approval again ### Blocked by Dependency If task cannot proceed: 1. Mark task as `[!]` with blocker description 2. Check if other tasks can proceed 3. Document expected resolution timeline 4. Consider creating dependency resolution track ## TDD Variations by Task Type ### Data Model Tasks ``` RED: Write test for model creation and validation GREEN: Implement model class with fields REFACTOR: Add computed properties, improve types ``` ### API Endpoint Tasks ``` RED: Write test for request/response contract GREEN: Implement endpoint handler REFACTOR: Extract validation, improve error handling ``` ### Integration Tasks ``` RED: Write test for component interaction GREEN: Wire components together REFACTOR: Improve error propagation, add logging ``` ### Refactoring Tasks ``` RED: Add characterization tests for current behavior GREEN: Apply refactoring (tests should stay green) REFACTOR: Clean up any introduced complexity ``` ## Working with Existing Tests When modifying code with existing tests: ### Extend, Don't Replace - Keep existing tests passing - Add new tests for new behavior - Update tests only when requirements change ### Test Migration When refactoring changes test structure: 1. Run existing tests (should pass) 2. Add new tests for refactored code 3. Migrate test cases to new structure 4. Remove old tests only after new tests pass ### Regression Prevention After any change: 1. Run full test suite 2. Check for unexpected failures 3. Investigate any new failures 4. Fix regressions before proceeding ## Checkpoint Verification Details ### Automated Verification Run before requesting approval: ```bash # Test suite pytest -v --tb=short # Coverage pytest --cov=src --cov-report=term-missing # Linting ruff check src/ tests/ # Type checking (if applicable) mypy src/ ``` ### Manual Verification Guidance For manual items, provide specific instructions: ```markdown ## Manual Verification Steps ### User Registration 1. Navigate to /register 2. Enter valid email: test@example.com 3. Enter password meeting requirements 4. Click Submit 5. Verify success message appears 6. Verify user appears in database ### Error Handling 1. Enter invalid email: "notanemail" 2. Verify error message shows 3. Verify form retains other entered data ``` ## Performance Considerations ### Test Suite Performance Keep test suite fast: - Use fixtures to avoid redundant setup - Mock slow external calls - Run subset during development, full suite at checkpoints ### Commit Performance Keep commits atomic: - One logical change per commit - Complete thought, not work-in-progress - Tests should pass after every commit ## Best Practices 1. **Never skip RED**: Always write failing tests first 2. **Small commits**: One logical change per commit 3. **Immediate updates**: Update plan.md right after task completion 4. **Wait for approval**: Never skip checkpoint verification 5. **Rich git notes**: Include context that helps future understanding 6. **Coverage discipline**: Don't accept coverage below target 7. **Quality gates**: Check all gates before marking complete 8. **Sequential phases**: Complete phases in order 9. **Document deviations**: Note any changes from original plan 10. **Clean state**: Each commit should leave code in working state 11. **Fast feedback**: Run relevant tests frequently during development 12. **Clear blockers**: Address blockers promptly, don't work around them
👍0
👁️0
🤖 Auto-discovered
🤖system prompt•7 months ago

airflow-dag-patterns

Build production Apache Airflow DAGs with best practices for

data
⭐1
# Apache Airflow DAG Patterns Production-ready patterns for Apache Airflow including DAG design, operators, sensors, testing, and deployment strategies. ## When to Use This Skill - Creating data pipeline orchestration with Airflow - Designing DAG structures and dependencies - Implementing custom operators and sensors - Testing Airflow DAGs locally - Setting up Airflow in production - Debugging failed DAG runs ## Core Concepts ### 1. DAG Design Principles | Principle | Description | | --------------- | ----------------------------------- | | **Idempotent** | Running twice produces same result | | **Atomic** | Tasks succeed or fail completely | | **Incremental** | Process only new/changed data | | **Observable** | Logs, metrics, alerts at every step | ### 2. Task Dependencies ```python # Linear task1 >> task2 >> task3 # Fan-out task1 >> [task2, task3, task4] # Fan-in [task1, task2, task3] >> task4 # Complex task1 >> task2 >> task4 task1 >> task3 >> task4 ``` ## Quick Start ```python # dags/example_dag.py from datetime import datetime, timedelta from airflow import DAG from airflow.operators.python import PythonOperator from airflow.operators.empty import EmptyOperator default_args = { 'owner': 'data-team', 'depends_on_past': False, 'email_on_failure': True, 'email_on_retry': False, 'retries': 3, 'retry_delay': timedelta(minutes=5), 'retry_exponential_backoff': True, 'max_retry_delay': timedelta(hours=1), } with DAG( dag_id='example_etl', default_args=default_args, description='Example ETL pipeline', schedule='0 6 * * *', # Daily at 6 AM start_date=datetime(2024, 1, 1), catchup=False, tags=['etl', 'example'], max_active_runs=1, ) as dag: start = EmptyOperator(task_id='start') def extract_data(**context): execution_date = context['ds'] # Extract logic here return {'records': 1000} extract = PythonOperator( task_id='extract', python_callable=extract_data, ) end = EmptyOperator(task_id='end') start >> extract >> end ``` ## Patterns ### Pattern 1: TaskFlow API (Airflow 2.0+) ```python # dags/taskflow_example.py from datetime import datetime from airflow.decorators import dag, task from airflow.models import Variable @dag( dag_id='taskflow_etl', schedule='@daily', start_date=datetime(2024, 1, 1), catchup=False, tags=['etl', 'taskflow'], ) def taskflow_etl(): """ETL pipeline using TaskFlow API""" @task() def extract(source: str) -> dict: """Extract data from source""" import pandas as pd df = pd.read_csv(f's3://bucket/{source}/{{ ds }}.csv') return {'data': df.to_dict(), 'rows': len(df)} @task() def transform(extracted: dict) -> dict: """Transform extracted data""" import pandas as pd df = pd.DataFrame(extracted['data']) df['processed_at'] = datetime.now() df = df.dropna() return {'data': df.to_dict(), 'rows': len(df)} @task() def load(transformed: dict, target: str): """Load data to target""" import pandas as pd df = pd.DataFrame(transformed['data']) df.to_parquet(f's3://bucket/{target}/{{ ds }}.parquet') return transformed['rows'] @task() def notify(rows_loaded: int): """Send notification""" print(f'Loaded {rows_loaded} rows') # Define dependencies with XCom passing extracted = extract(source='raw_data') transformed = transform(extracted) loaded = load(transformed, target='processed_data') notify(loaded) # Instantiate the DAG taskflow_etl() ``` ### Pattern 2: Dynamic DAG Generation ```python # dags/dynamic_dag_factory.py from datetime import datetime, timedelta from airflow import DAG from airflow.operators.python import PythonOperator from airflow.models import Variable import json # Configuration for multiple similar pipelines PIPELINE_CONFIGS = [ {'name': 'customers', 'schedule': '@daily', 'source': 's3://raw/customers'}, {'name': 'orders', 'schedule': '@hourly', 'source': 's3://raw/orders'}, {'name': 'products', 'schedule': '@weekly', 'source': 's3://raw/products'}, ] def create_dag(config: dict) -> DAG: """Factory function to create DAGs from config""" dag_id = f"etl_{config['name']}" default_args = { 'owner': 'data-team', 'retries': 3, 'retry_delay': timedelta(minutes=5), } dag = DAG( dag_id=dag_id, default_args=default_args, schedule=config['schedule'], start_date=datetime(2024, 1, 1), catchup=False, tags=['etl', 'dynamic', config['name']], ) with dag: def extract_fn(source, **context): print(f"Extracting from {source} for {context['ds']}") def transform_fn(**context): print(f"Transforming data for {context['ds']}") def load_fn(table_name, **context): print(f"Loading to {table_name} for {context['ds']}") extract = PythonOperator( task_id='extract', python_callable=extract_fn, op_kwargs={'source': config['source']}, ) transform = PythonOperator( task_id='transform', python_callable=transform_fn, ) load = PythonOperator( task_id='load', python_callable=load_fn, op_kwargs={'table_name': config['name']}, ) extract >> transform >> load return dag # Generate DAGs for config in PIPELINE_CONFIGS: globals()[f"dag_{config['name']}"] = create_dag(config) ``` ### Pattern 3: Branching and Conditional Logic ```python # dags/branching_example.py from airflow.decorators import dag, task from airflow.operators.python import BranchPythonOperator from airflow.operators.empty import EmptyOperator from airflow.utils.trigger_rule import TriggerRule @dag( dag_id='branching_pipeline', schedule='@daily', start_date=datetime(2024, 1, 1), catchup=False, ) def branching_pipeline(): @task() def check_data_quality() -> dict: """Check data quality and return metrics""" quality_score = 0.95 # Simulated return {'score': quality_score, 'rows': 10000} def choose_branch(**context) -> str: """Determine which branch to execute""" ti = context['ti'] metrics = ti.xcom_pull(task_ids='check_data_quality') if metrics['score'] >= 0.9: return 'high_quality_path' elif metrics['score'] >= 0.7: return 'medium_quality_path' else: return 'low_quality_path' quality_check = check_data_quality() branch = BranchPythonOperator( task_id='branch', python_callable=choose_branch, ) high_quality = EmptyOperator(task_id='high_quality_path') medium_quality = EmptyOperator(task_id='medium_quality_path') low_quality = EmptyOperator(task_id='low_quality_path') # Join point - runs after any branch completes join = EmptyOperator( task_id='join', trigger_rule=TriggerRule.NONE_FAILED_MIN_ONE_SUCCESS, ) quality_check >> branch >> [high_quality, medium_quality, low_quality] >> join branching_pipeline() ``` ### Pattern 4: Sensors and External Dependencies ```python # dags/sensor_patterns.py from datetime import datetime, timedelta from airflow import DAG from airflow.sensors.filesystem import FileSensor from airflow.providers.amazon.aws.sensors.s3 import S3KeySensor from airflow.sensors.external_task import ExternalTaskSensor from airflow.operators.python import PythonOperator with DAG( dag_id='sensor_example', schedule='@daily', start_date=datetime(2024, 1, 1), catchup=False, ) as dag: # Wait for file on S3 wait_for_file = S3KeySensor( task_id='wait_for_s3_file', bucket_name='data-lake', bucket_key='raw/{{ ds }}/data.parquet', aws_conn_id='aws_default', timeout=60 * 60 * 2, # 2 hours poke_interval=60 * 5, # Check every 5 minutes mode='reschedule', # Free up worker slot while waiting ) # Wait for another DAG to complete wait_for_upstream = ExternalTaskSensor( task_id='wait_for_upstream_dag', external_dag_id='upstream_etl', external_task_id='final_task', execution_date_fn=lambda dt: dt, # Same execution date timeout=60 * 60 * 3, mode='reschedule', ) # Custom sensor using @task.sensor decorator @task.sensor(poke_interval=60, timeout=3600, mode='reschedule') def wait_for_api() -> PokeReturnValue: """Custom sensor for API availability""" import requests response = requests.get('https://api.example.com/health') is_done = response.status_code == 200 return PokeReturnValue(is_done=is_done, xcom_value=response.json()) api_ready = wait_for_api() def process_data(**context): api_result = context['ti'].xcom_pull(task_ids='wait_for_api') print(f"API returned: {api_result}") process = PythonOperator( task_id='process', python_callable=process_data, ) [wait_for_file, wait_for_upstream, api_ready] >> process ``` ### Pattern 5: Error Handling and Alerts ```python # dags/error_handling.py from datetime import datetime, timedelta from airflow import DAG from airflow.operators.python import PythonOperator from airflow.utils.trigger_rule import TriggerRule from airflow.models import Variable def task_failure_callback(context): """Callback on task failure""" task_instance = context['task_instance'] exception = context.get('exception') # Send to Slack/PagerDuty/etc message = f""" Task Failed! DAG: {task_instance.dag_id} Task: {task_instance.task_id} Execution Date: {context['ds']} Error: {exception} Log URL: {task_instance.log_url} """ # send_slack_alert(message) print(message) def dag_failure_callback(context): """Callback on DAG failure""" # Aggregate failures, send summary pass with DAG( dag_id='error_handling_example', schedule='@daily', start_date=datetime(2024, 1, 1), catchup=False, on_failure_callback=dag_failure_callback, default_args={ 'on_failure_callback': task_failure_callback, 'retries': 3, 'retry_delay': timedelta(minutes=5), }, ) as dag: def might_fail(**context): import random if random.random() < 0.3: raise ValueError("Random failure!") return "Success" risky_task = PythonOperator( task_id='risky_task', python_callable=might_fail, ) def cleanup(**context): """Cleanup runs regardless of upstream failures""" print("Cleaning up...") cleanup_task = PythonOperator( task_id='cleanup', python_callable=cleanup, trigger_rule=TriggerRule.ALL_DONE, # Run even if upstream fails ) def notify_success(**context): """Only runs if all upstream succeeded""" print("All tasks succeeded!") success_notification = PythonOperator( task_id='notify_success', python_callable=notify_success, trigger_rule=TriggerRule.ALL_SUCCESS, ) risky_task >> [cleanup_task, success_notification] ``` ### Pattern 6: Testing DAGs ```python # tests/test_dags.py import pytest from datetime import datetime from airflow.models import DagBag @pytest.fixture def dagbag(): return DagBag(dag_folder='dags/', include_examples=False) def test_dag_loaded(dagbag): """Test that all DAGs load without errors""" assert len(dagbag.import_errors) == 0, f"DAG import errors: {dagbag.import_errors}" def test_dag_structure(dagbag): """Test specific DAG structure""" dag = dagbag.get_dag('example_etl') assert dag is not None assert len(dag.tasks) == 3 assert dag.schedule_interval == '0 6 * * *' def test_task_dependencies(dagbag): """Test task dependencies are correct""" dag = dagbag.get_dag('example_etl') extract_task = dag.get_task('extract') assert 'start' in [t.task_id for t in extract_task.upstream_list] assert 'end' in [t.task_id for t in extract_task.downstream_list] def test_dag_integrity(dagbag): """Test DAG has no cycles and is valid""" for dag_id, dag in dagbag.dags.items(): assert dag.test_cycle() is None, f"Cycle detected in {dag_id}" # Test individual task logic def test_extract_function(): """Unit test for extract function""" from dags.example_dag import extract_data result = extract_data(ds='2024-01-01') assert 'records' in result assert isinstance(result['records'], int) ``` ## Project Structure ``` airflow/ ├── dags/ │ ├── __init__.py │ ├── common/ │ │ ├── __init__.py │ │ ├── operators.py # Custom operators │ │ ├── sensors.py # Custom sensors │ │ └── callbacks.py # Alert callbacks │ ├── etl/ │ │ ├── customers.py │ │ └── orders.py │ └── ml/ │ └── training.py ├── plugins/ │ └── custom_plugin.py ├── tests/ │ ├── __init__.py │ ├── test_dags.py │ └── test_operators.py ├── docker-compose.yml └── requirements.txt ``` ## Best Practices ### Do's - **Use TaskFlow API** - Cleaner code, automatic XCom - **Set timeouts** - Prevent zombie tasks - **Use `mode='reschedule'`** - For sensors, free up workers - **Test DAGs** - Unit tests and integration tests - **Idempotent tasks** - Safe to retry ### Don'ts - **Don't use `depends_on_past=True`** - Creates bottlenecks - **Don't hardcode dates** - Use `{{ ds }}` macros - **Don't use global state** - Tasks should be stateless - **Don't skip catchup blindly** - Understand implications - **Don't put heavy logic in DAG file** - Import from modules ## Resources - [Airflow Documentation](https://airflow.apache.org/docs/) - [Astronomer Guides](https://docs.astronomer.io/learn) - [TaskFlow API](https://airflow.apache.org/docs/apache-airflow/stable/tutorial/taskflow.html)
👍0
👁️0
🤖 Auto-discovered
🤖system prompt•7 months ago

spark-optimization

Optimize Apache Spark jobs with partitioning, caching, shuffle

data
⭐1
# Apache Spark Optimization Production patterns for optimizing Apache Spark jobs including partitioning strategies, memory management, shuffle optimization, and performance tuning. ## When to Use This Skill - Optimizing slow Spark jobs - Tuning memory and executor configuration - Implementing efficient partitioning strategies - Debugging Spark performance issues - Scaling Spark pipelines for large datasets - Reducing shuffle and data skew ## Core Concepts ### 1. Spark Execution Model ``` Driver Program ↓ Job (triggered by action) ↓ Stages (separated by shuffles) ↓ Tasks (one per partition) ``` ### 2. Key Performance Factors | Factor | Impact | Solution | | ----------------- | --------------------- | ----------------------------- | | **Shuffle** | Network I/O, disk I/O | Minimize wide transformations | | **Data Skew** | Uneven task duration | Salting, broadcast joins | | **Serialization** | CPU overhead | Use Kryo, columnar formats | | **Memory** | GC pressure, spills | Tune executor memory | | **Partitions** | Parallelism | Right-size partitions | ## Quick Start ```python from pyspark.sql import SparkSession from pyspark.sql import functions as F # Create optimized Spark session spark = (SparkSession.builder .appName("OptimizedJob") .config("spark.sql.adaptive.enabled", "true") .config("spark.sql.adaptive.coalescePartitions.enabled", "true") .config("spark.sql.adaptive.skewJoin.enabled", "true") .config("spark.serializer", "org.apache.spark.serializer.KryoSerializer") .config("spark.sql.shuffle.partitions", "200") .getOrCreate()) # Read with optimized settings df = (spark.read .format("parquet") .option("mergeSchema", "false") .load("s3://bucket/data/")) # Efficient transformations result = (df .filter(F.col("date") >= "2024-01-01") .select("id", "amount", "category") .groupBy("category") .agg(F.sum("amount").alias("total"))) result.write.mode("overwrite").parquet("s3://bucket/output/") ``` ## Patterns ### Pattern 1: Optimal Partitioning ```python # Calculate optimal partition count def calculate_partitions(data_size_gb: float, partition_size_mb: int = 128) -> int: """ Optimal partition size: 128MB - 256MB Too few: Under-utilization, memory pressure Too many: Task scheduling overhead """ return max(int(data_size_gb * 1024 / partition_size_mb), 1) # Repartition for even distribution df_repartitioned = df.repartition(200, "partition_key") # Coalesce to reduce partitions (no shuffle) df_coalesced = df.coalesce(100) # Partition pruning with predicate pushdown df = (spark.read.parquet("s3://bucket/data/") .filter(F.col("date") == "2024-01-01")) # Spark pushes this down # Write with partitioning for future queries (df.write .partitionBy("year", "month", "day") .mode("overwrite") .parquet("s3://bucket/partitioned_output/")) ``` ### Pattern 2: Join Optimization ```python from pyspark.sql import functions as F from pyspark.sql.types import * # 1. Broadcast Join - Small table joins # Best when: One side < 10MB (configurable) small_df = spark.read.parquet("s3://bucket/small_table/") # < 10MB large_df = spark.read.parquet("s3://bucket/large_table/") # TBs # Explicit broadcast hint result = large_df.join( F.broadcast(small_df), on="key", how="left" ) # 2. Sort-Merge Join - Default for large tables # Requires shuffle, but handles any size result = large_df1.join(large_df2, on="key", how="inner") # 3. Bucket Join - Pre-sorted, no shuffle at join time # Write bucketed tables (df.write .bucketBy(200, "customer_id") .sortBy("customer_id") .mode("overwrite") .saveAsTable("bucketed_orders")) # Join bucketed tables (no shuffle!) orders = spark.table("bucketed_orders") customers = spark.table("bucketed_customers") # Same bucket count result = orders.join(customers, on="customer_id") # 4. Skew Join Handling # Enable AQE skew join optimization spark.conf.set("spark.sql.adaptive.skewJoin.enabled", "true") spark.conf.set("spark.sql.adaptive.skewJoin.skewedPartitionFactor", "5") spark.conf.set("spark.sql.adaptive.skewJoin.skewedPartitionThresholdInBytes", "256MB") # Manual salting for severe skew def salt_join(df_skewed, df_other, key_col, num_salts=10): """Add salt to distribute skewed keys""" # Add salt to skewed side df_salted = df_skewed.withColumn( "salt", (F.rand() * num_salts).cast("int") ).withColumn( "salted_key", F.concat(F.col(key_col), F.lit("_"), F.col("salt")) ) # Explode other side with all salts df_exploded = df_other.crossJoin( spark.range(num_salts).withColumnRenamed("id", "salt") ).withColumn( "salted_key", F.concat(F.col(key_col), F.lit("_"), F.col("salt")) ) # Join on salted key return df_salted.join(df_exploded, on="salted_key", how="inner") ``` ### Pattern 3: Caching and Persistence ```python from pyspark import StorageLevel # Cache when reusing DataFrame multiple times df = spark.read.parquet("s3://bucket/data/") df_filtered = df.filter(F.col("status") == "active") # Cache in memory (MEMORY_AND_DISK is default) df_filtered.cache() # Or with specific storage level df_filtered.persist(StorageLevel.MEMORY_AND_DISK_SER) # Force materialization df_filtered.count() # Use in multiple actions agg1 = df_filtered.groupBy("category").count() agg2 = df_filtered.groupBy("region").sum("amount") # Unpersist when done df_filtered.unpersist() # Storage levels explained: # MEMORY_ONLY - Fast, but may not fit # MEMORY_AND_DISK - Spills to disk if needed (recommended) # MEMORY_ONLY_SER - Serialized, less memory, more CPU # DISK_ONLY - When memory is tight # OFF_HEAP - Tungsten off-heap memory # Checkpoint for complex lineage spark.sparkContext.setCheckpointDir("s3://bucket/checkpoints/") df_complex = (df .join(other_df, "key") .groupBy("category") .agg(F.sum("amount"))) df_complex.checkpoint() # Breaks lineage, materializes ``` ### Pattern 4: Memory Tuning ```python # Executor memory configuration # spark-submit --executor-memory 8g --executor-cores 4 # Memory breakdown (8GB executor): # - spark.memory.fraction = 0.6 (60% = 4.8GB for execution + storage) # - spark.memory.storageFraction = 0.5 (50% of 4.8GB = 2.4GB for cache) # - Remaining 2.4GB for execution (shuffles, joins, sorts) # - 40% = 3.2GB for user data structures and internal metadata spark = (SparkSession.builder .config("spark.executor.memory", "8g") .config("spark.executor.memoryOverhead", "2g") # For non-JVM memory .config("spark.memory.fraction", "0.6") .config("spark.memory.storageFraction", "0.5") .config("spark.sql.shuffle.partitions", "200") # For memory-intensive operations .config("spark.sql.autoBroadcastJoinThreshold", "50MB") # Prevent OOM on large shuffles .config("spark.sql.files.maxPartitionBytes", "128MB") .getOrCreate()) # Monitor memory usage def print_memory_usage(spark): """Print current memory usage""" sc = spark.sparkContext for executor in sc._jsc.sc().getExecutorMemoryStatus().keySet().toArray(): mem_status = sc._jsc.sc().getExecutorMemoryStatus().get(executor) total = mem_status._1() / (1024**3) free = mem_status._2() / (1024**3) print(f"{executor}: {total:.2f}GB total, {free:.2f}GB free") ``` ### Pattern 5: Shuffle Optimization ```python # Reduce shuffle data size spark.conf.set("spark.sql.shuffle.partitions", "auto") # With AQE spark.conf.set("spark.shuffle.compress", "true") spark.conf.set("spark.shuffle.spill.compress", "true") # Pre-aggregate before shuffle df_optimized = (df # Local aggregation first (combiner) .groupBy("key", "partition_col") .agg(F.sum("value").alias("partial_sum")) # Then global aggregation .groupBy("key") .agg(F.sum("partial_sum").alias("total"))) # Avoid shuffle with map-side operations # BAD: Shuffle for each distinct distinct_count = df.select("category").distinct().count() # GOOD: Approximate distinct (no shuffle) approx_count = df.select(F.approx_count_distinct("category")).collect()[0][0] # Use coalesce instead of repartition when reducing partitions df_reduced = df.coalesce(10) # No shuffle # Optimize shuffle with compression spark.conf.set("spark.io.compression.codec", "lz4") # Fast compression ``` ### Pattern 6: Data Format Optimization ```python # Parquet optimizations (df.write .option("compression", "snappy") # Fast compression .option("parquet.block.size", 128 * 1024 * 1024) # 128MB row groups .parquet("s3://bucket/output/")) # Column pruning - only read needed columns df = (spark.read.parquet("s3://bucket/data/") .select("id", "amount", "date")) # Spark only reads these columns # Predicate pushdown - filter at storage level df = (spark.read.parquet("s3://bucket/partitioned/year=2024/") .filter(F.col("status") == "active")) # Pushed to Parquet reader # Delta Lake optimizations (df.write .format("delta") .option("optimizeWrite", "true") # Bin-packing .option("autoCompact", "true") # Compact small files .mode("overwrite") .save("s3://bucket/delta_table/")) # Z-ordering for multi-dimensional queries spark.sql(""" OPTIMIZE delta.`s3://bucket/delta_table/` ZORDER BY (customer_id, date) """) ``` ### Pattern 7: Monitoring and Debugging ```python # Enable detailed metrics spark.conf.set("spark.sql.codegen.wholeStage", "true") spark.conf.set("spark.sql.execution.arrow.pyspark.enabled", "true") # Explain query plan df.explain(mode="extended") # Modes: simple, extended, codegen, cost, formatted # Get physical plan statistics df.explain(mode="cost") # Monitor task metrics def analyze_stage_metrics(spark): """Analyze recent stage metrics""" status_tracker = spark.sparkContext.statusTracker() for stage_id in status_tracker.getActiveStageIds(): stage_info = status_tracker.getStageInfo(stage_id) print(f"Stage {stage_id}:") print(f" Tasks: {stage_info.numTasks}") print(f" Completed: {stage_info.numCompletedTasks}") print(f" Failed: {stage_info.numFailedTasks}") # Identify data skew def check_partition_skew(df): """Check for partition skew""" partition_counts = (df .withColumn("partition_id", F.spark_partition_id()) .groupBy("partition_id") .count() .orderBy(F.desc("count"))) partition_counts.show(20) stats = partition_counts.select( F.min("count").alias("min"), F.max("count").alias("max"), F.avg("count").alias("avg"), F.stddev("count").alias("stddev") ).collect()[0] skew_ratio = stats["max"] / stats["avg"] print(f"Skew ratio: {skew_ratio:.2f}x (>2x indicates skew)") ``` ## Configuration Cheat Sheet ```python # Production configuration template spark_configs = { # Adaptive Query Execution (AQE) "spark.sql.adaptive.enabled": "true", "spark.sql.adaptive.coalescePartitions.enabled": "true", "spark.sql.adaptive.skewJoin.enabled": "true", # Memory "spark.executor.memory": "8g", "spark.executor.memoryOverhead": "2g", "spark.memory.fraction": "0.6", "spark.memory.storageFraction": "0.5", # Parallelism "spark.sql.shuffle.partitions": "200", "spark.default.parallelism": "200", # Serialization "spark.serializer": "org.apache.spark.serializer.KryoSerializer", "spark.sql.execution.arrow.pyspark.enabled": "true", # Compression "spark.io.compression.codec": "lz4", "spark.shuffle.compress": "true", # Broadcast "spark.sql.autoBroadcastJoinThreshold": "50MB", # File handling "spark.sql.files.maxPartitionBytes": "128MB", "spark.sql.files.openCostInBytes": "4MB", } ``` ## Best Practices ### Do's - **Enable AQE** - Adaptive query execution handles many issues - **Use Parquet/Delta** - Columnar formats with compression - **Broadcast small tables** - Avoid shuffle for small joins - **Monitor Spark UI** - Check for skew, spills, GC - **Right-size partitions** - 128MB - 256MB per partition ### Don'ts - **Don't collect large data** - Keep data distributed - **Don't use UDFs unnecessarily** - Use built-in functions - **Don't over-cache** - Memory is limited - **Don't ignore data skew** - It dominates job time - **Don't use `.count()` for existence** - Use `.take(1)` or `.isEmpty()` ## Resources - [Spark Performance Tuning](https://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/sql-performance-tuning.html) - [Spark Configuration](https://spark.apache.org/docs/latest/configuration.html) - [Databricks Optimization Guide](https://docs.databricks.com/en/optimizations/index.html)
👍0
👁️0
🤖 Auto-discovered
🤖system prompt•7 months ago

postgresql-table-design

Design a PostgreSQL-specific schema. Covers best-practices, data

data
⭐1
# PostgreSQL Table Design ## Core Rules - Define a **PRIMARY KEY** for reference tables (users, orders, etc.). Not always needed for time-series/event/log data. When used, prefer `BIGINT GENERATED ALWAYS AS IDENTITY`; use `UUID` only when global uniqueness/opacity is needed. - **Normalize first (to 3NF)** to eliminate data redundancy and update anomalies; denormalize **only** for measured, high-ROI reads where join performance is proven problematic. Premature denormalization creates maintenance burden. - Add **NOT NULL** everywhere it’s semantically required; use **DEFAULT**s for common values. - Create **indexes for access paths you actually query**: PK/unique (auto), **FK columns (manual!)**, frequent filters/sorts, and join keys. - Prefer **TIMESTAMPTZ** for event time; **NUMERIC** for money; **TEXT** for strings; **BIGINT** for integer values, **DOUBLE PRECISION** for floats (or `NUMERIC` for exact decimal arithmetic). ## PostgreSQL “Gotchas” - **Identifiers**: unquoted → lowercased. Avoid quoted/mixed-case names. Convention: use `snake_case` for table/column names. - **Unique + NULLs**: UNIQUE allows multiple NULLs. Use `UNIQUE (...) NULLS NOT DISTINCT` (PG15+) to restrict to one NULL. - **FK indexes**: PostgreSQL **does not** auto-index FK columns. Add them. - **No silent coercions**: length/precision overflows error out (no truncation). Example: inserting 999 into `NUMERIC(2,0)` fails with error, unlike some databases that silently truncate or round. - **Sequences/identity have gaps** (normal; don't "fix"). Rollbacks, crashes, and concurrent transactions create gaps in ID sequences (1, 2, 5, 6...). This is expected behavior—don't try to make IDs consecutive. - **Heap storage**: no clustered PK by default (unlike SQL Server/MySQL InnoDB); `CLUSTER` is one-off reorganization, not maintained on subsequent inserts. Row order on disk is insertion order unless explicitly clustered. - **MVCC**: updates/deletes leave dead tuples; vacuum handles them—design to avoid hot wide-row churn. ## Data Types - **IDs**: `BIGINT GENERATED ALWAYS AS IDENTITY` preferred (`GENERATED BY DEFAULT` also fine); `UUID` when merging/federating/used in a distributed system or for opaque IDs. Generate with `uuidv7()` (preferred if using PG18+) or `gen_random_uuid()` (if using an older PG version). - **Integers**: prefer `BIGINT` unless storage space is critical; `INTEGER` for smaller ranges; avoid `SMALLINT` unless constrained. - **Floats**: prefer `DOUBLE PRECISION` over `REAL` unless storage space is critical. Use `NUMERIC` for exact decimal arithmetic. - **Strings**: prefer `TEXT`; if length limits needed, use `CHECK (LENGTH(col) <= n)` instead of `VARCHAR(n)`; avoid `CHAR(n)`. Use `BYTEA` for binary data. Large strings/binary (>2KB default threshold) automatically stored in TOAST with compression. TOAST storage: `PLAIN` (no TOAST), `EXTENDED` (compress + out-of-line), `EXTERNAL` (out-of-line, no compress), `MAIN` (compress, keep in-line if possible). Default `EXTENDED` usually optimal. Control with `ALTER TABLE tbl ALTER COLUMN col SET STORAGE strategy` and `ALTER TABLE tbl SET (toast_tuple_target = 4096)` for threshold. Case-insensitive: for locale/accent handling use non-deterministic collations; for plain ASCII use expression indexes on `LOWER(col)` (preferred unless column needs case-insensitive PK/FK/UNIQUE) or `CITEXT`. - **Money**: `NUMERIC(p,s)` (never float). - **Time**: `TIMESTAMPTZ` for timestamps; `DATE` for date-only; `INTERVAL` for durations. Avoid `TIMESTAMP` (without timezone). Use `now()` for transaction start time, `clock_timestamp()` for current wall-clock time. - **Booleans**: `BOOLEAN` with `NOT NULL` constraint unless tri-state values are required. - **Enums**: `CREATE TYPE ... AS ENUM` for small, stable sets (e.g. US states, days of week). For business-logic-driven and evolving values (e.g. order statuses) → use TEXT (or INT) + CHECK or lookup table. - **Arrays**: `TEXT[]`, `INTEGER[]`, etc. Use for ordered lists where you query elements. Index with **GIN** for containment (`@>`, `<@`) and overlap (`&&`) queries. Access: `arr[1]` (1-indexed), `arr[1:3]` (slicing). Good for tags, categories; avoid for relations—use junction tables instead. Literal syntax: `'{val1,val2}'` or `ARRAY[val1,val2]`. - **Range types**: `daterange`, `numrange`, `tstzrange` for intervals. Support overlap (`&&`), containment (`@>`), operators. Index with **GiST**. Good for scheduling, versioning, numeric ranges. Pick a bounds scheme and use it consistently; prefer `[)` (inclusive/exclusive) by default. - **Network types**: `INET` for IP addresses, `CIDR` for network ranges, `MACADDR` for MAC addresses. Support network operators (`<<`, `>>`, `&&`). - **Geometric types**: `POINT`, `LINE`, `POLYGON`, `CIRCLE` for 2D spatial data. Index with **GiST**. Consider **PostGIS** for advanced spatial features. - **Text search**: `TSVECTOR` for full-text search documents, `TSQUERY` for search queries. Index `tsvector` with **GIN**. Always specify language: `to_tsvector('english', col)` and `to_tsquery('english', 'query')`. Never use single-argument versions. This applies to both index expressions and queries. - **Domain types**: `CREATE DOMAIN email AS TEXT CHECK (VALUE ~ '^[^@]+@[^@]+$')` for reusable custom types with validation. Enforces constraints across tables. - **Composite types**: `CREATE TYPE address AS (street TEXT, city TEXT, zip TEXT)` for structured data within columns. Access with `(col).field` syntax. - **JSONB**: preferred over JSON; index with **GIN**. Use only for optional/semi-structured attrs. ONLY use JSON if the original ordering of the contents MUST be preserved. - **Vector types**: `vector` type by `pgvector` for vector similarity search for embeddings. ### Do not use the following data types - DO NOT use `timestamp` (without time zone); DO use `timestamptz` instead. - DO NOT use `char(n)` or `varchar(n)`; DO use `text` instead. - DO NOT use `money` type; DO use `numeric` instead. - DO NOT use `timetz` type; DO use `timestamptz` instead. - DO NOT use `timestamptz(0)` or any other precision specification; DO use `timestamptz` instead - DO NOT use `serial` type; DO use `generated always as identity` instead. ## Table Types - **Regular**: default; fully durable, logged. - **TEMPORARY**: session-scoped, auto-dropped, not logged. Faster for scratch work. - **UNLOGGED**: persistent but not crash-safe. Faster writes; good for caches/staging. ## Row-Level Security Enable with `ALTER TABLE tbl ENABLE ROW LEVEL SECURITY`. Create policies: `CREATE POLICY user_access ON orders FOR SELECT TO app_users USING (user_id = current_user_id())`. Built-in user-based access control at the row level. ## Constraints - **PK**: implicit UNIQUE + NOT NULL; creates a B-tree index. - **FK**: specify `ON DELETE/UPDATE` action (`CASCADE`, `RESTRICT`, `SET NULL`, `SET DEFAULT`). Add explicit index on referencing column—speeds up joins and prevents locking issues on parent deletes/updates. Use `DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED` for circular FK dependencies checked at transaction end. - **UNIQUE**: creates a B-tree index; allows multiple NULLs unless `NULLS NOT DISTINCT` (PG15+). Standard behavior: `(1, NULL)` and `(1, NULL)` are allowed. With `NULLS NOT DISTINCT`: only one `(1, NULL)` allowed. Prefer `NULLS NOT DISTINCT` unless you specifically need duplicate NULLs. - **CHECK**: row-local constraints; NULL values pass the check (three-valued logic). Example: `CHECK (price > 0)` allows NULL prices. Combine with `NOT NULL` to enforce: `price NUMERIC NOT NULL CHECK (price > 0)`. - **EXCLUDE**: prevents overlapping values using operators. `EXCLUDE USING gist (room_id WITH =, booking_period WITH &&)` prevents double-booking rooms. Requires appropriate index type (often GiST). ## Indexing - **B-tree**: default for equality/range queries (`=`, `<`, `>`, `BETWEEN`, `ORDER BY`) - **Composite**: order matters—index used if equality on leftmost prefix (`WHERE a = ? AND b > ?` uses index on `(a,b)`, but `WHERE b = ?` does not). Put most selective/frequently filtered columns first. - **Covering**: `CREATE INDEX ON tbl (id) INCLUDE (name, email)` - includes non-key columns for index-only scans without visiting table. - **Partial**: for hot subsets (`WHERE status = 'active'` → `CREATE INDEX ON tbl (user_id) WHERE status = 'active'`). Any query with `status = 'active'` can use this index. - **Expression**: for computed search keys (`CREATE INDEX ON tbl (LOWER(email))`). Expression must match exactly in WHERE clause: `WHERE LOWER(email) = 'user@example.com'`. - **GIN**: JSONB containment/existence, arrays (`@>`, `?`), full-text search (`@@`) - **GiST**: ranges, geometry, exclusion constraints - **BRIN**: very large, naturally ordered data (time-series)—minimal storage overhead. Effective when row order on disk correlates with indexed column (insertion order or after `CLUSTER`). ## Partitioning - Use for very large tables (>100M rows) where queries consistently filter on partition key (often time/date). - Alternate use: use for tables where data maintenance tasks dictates e.g. data pruned or bulk replaced periodically - **RANGE**: common for time-series (`PARTITION BY RANGE (created_at)`). Create partitions: `CREATE TABLE logs_2024_01 PARTITION OF logs FOR VALUES FROM ('2024-01-01') TO ('2024-02-01')`. **TimescaleDB** automates time-based or ID-based partitioning with retention policies and compression. - **LIST**: for discrete values (`PARTITION BY LIST (region)`). Example: `FOR VALUES IN ('us-east', 'us-west')`. - **HASH**: for even distribution when no natural key (`PARTITION BY HASH (user_id)`). Creates N partitions with modulus. - **Constraint exclusion**: requires `CHECK` constraints on partitions for query planner to prune. Auto-created for declarative partitioning (PG10+). - Prefer declarative partitioning or hypertables. Do NOT use table inheritance. - **Limitations**: no global UNIQUE constraints—include partition key in PK/UNIQUE. FKs from partitioned tables not supported; use triggers. ## Special Considerations ### Update-Heavy Tables - **Separate hot/cold columns**—put frequently updated columns in separate table to minimize bloat. - **Use `fillfactor=90`** to leave space for HOT updates that avoid index maintenance. - **Avoid updating indexed columns**—prevents beneficial HOT updates. - **Partition by update patterns**—separate frequently updated rows in a different partition from stable data. ### Insert-Heavy Workloads - **Minimize indexes**—only create what you query; every index slows inserts. - **Use `COPY` or multi-row `INSERT`** instead of single-row inserts. - **UNLOGGED tables** for rebuildable staging data—much faster writes. - **Defer index creation** for bulk loads—>drop index, load data, recreate indexes. - **Partition by time/hash** to distribute load. **TimescaleDB** automates partitioning and compression of insert-heavy data. - **Use a natural key for primary key** such as a (timestamp, device_id) if enforcing global uniqueness is important many insert-heavy tables don't need a primary key at all. - If you do need a surrogate key, **Prefer `BIGINT GENERATED ALWAYS AS IDENTITY` over `UUID`**. ### Upsert-Friendly Design - **Requires UNIQUE index** on conflict target columns—`ON CONFLICT (col1, col2)` needs exact matching unique index (partial indexes don't work). - **Use `EXCLUDED.column`** to reference would-be-inserted values; only update columns that actually changed to reduce write overhead. - **`DO NOTHING` faster** than `DO UPDATE` when no actual update needed. ### Safe Schema Evolution - **Transactional DDL**: most DDL operations can run in transactions and be rolled back—`BEGIN; ALTER TABLE...; ROLLBACK;` for safe testing. - **Concurrent index creation**: `CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY` avoids blocking writes but can't run in transactions. - **Volatile defaults cause rewrites**: adding `NOT NULL` columns with volatile defaults (e.g., `now()`, `gen_random_uuid()`) rewrites entire table. Non-volatile defaults are fast. - **Drop constraints before columns**: `ALTER TABLE DROP CONSTRAINT` then `DROP COLUMN` to avoid dependency issues. - **Function signature changes**: `CREATE OR REPLACE` with different arguments creates overloads, not replacements. DROP old version if no overload desired. ## Generated Columns - `... GENERATED ALWAYS AS (<expr>) STORED` for computed, indexable fields. PG18+ adds `VIRTUAL` columns (computed on read, not stored). ## Extensions - **`pgcrypto`**: `crypt()` for password hashing. - **`uuid-ossp`**: alternative UUID functions; prefer `pgcrypto` for new projects. - **`pg_trgm`**: fuzzy text search with `%` operator, `similarity()` function. Index with GIN for `LIKE '%pattern%'` acceleration. - **`citext`**: case-insensitive text type. Prefer expression indexes on `LOWER(col)` unless you need case-insensitive constraints. - **`btree_gin`/`btree_gist`**: enable mixed-type indexes (e.g., GIN index on both JSONB and text columns). - **`hstore`**: key-value pairs; mostly superseded by JSONB but useful for simple string mappings. - **`timescaledb`**: essential for time-series—automated partitioning, retention, compression, continuous aggregates. - **`postgis`**: comprehensive geospatial support beyond basic geometric types—essential for location-based applications. - **`pgvector`**: vector similarity search for embeddings. - **`pgaudit`**: audit logging for all database activity. ## JSONB Guidance - Prefer `JSONB` with **GIN** index. - Default: `CREATE INDEX ON tbl USING GIN (jsonb_col);` → accelerates: - **Containment** `jsonb_col @> '{"k":"v"}'` - **Key existence** `jsonb_col ? 'k'`, **any/all keys** `?\|`, `?&` - **Path containment** on nested docs - **Disjunction** `jsonb_col @> ANY(ARRAY['{"status":"active"}', '{"status":"pending"}'])` - Heavy `@>` workloads: consider opclass `jsonb_path_ops` for smaller/faster containment-only indexes: - `CREATE INDEX ON tbl USING GIN (jsonb_col jsonb_path_ops);` - **Trade-off**: loses support for key existence (`?`, `?|`, `?&`) queries—only supports containment (`@>`) - Equality/range on a specific scalar field: extract and index with B-tree (generated column or expression): - `ALTER TABLE tbl ADD COLUMN price INT GENERATED ALWAYS AS ((jsonb_col->>'price')::INT) STORED;` - `CREATE INDEX ON tbl (price);` - Prefer queries like `WHERE price BETWEEN 100 AND 500` (uses B-tree) over `WHERE (jsonb_col->>'price')::INT BETWEEN 100 AND 500` without index. - Arrays inside JSONB: use GIN + `@>` for containment (e.g., tags). Consider `jsonb_path_ops` if only doing containment. - Keep core relations in tables; use JSONB for optional/variable attributes. - Use constraints to limit allowed JSONB values in a column e.g. `config JSONB NOT NULL CHECK(jsonb_typeof(config) = 'object')` ## Examples ### Users ```sql CREATE TABLE users ( user_id BIGINT GENERATED ALWAYS AS IDENTITY PRIMARY KEY, email TEXT NOT NULL UNIQUE, name TEXT NOT NULL, created_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL DEFAULT now() ); CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON users (LOWER(email)); CREATE INDEX ON users (created_at); ``` ### Orders ```sql CREATE TABLE orders ( order_id BIGINT GENERATED ALWAYS AS IDENTITY PRIMARY KEY, user_id BIGINT NOT NULL REFERENCES users(user_id), status TEXT NOT NULL DEFAULT 'PENDING' CHECK (status IN ('PENDING','PAID','CANCELED')), total NUMERIC(10,2) NOT NULL CHECK (total > 0), created_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL DEFAULT now() ); CREATE INDEX ON orders (user_id); CREATE INDEX ON orders (created_at); ``` ### JSONB ```sql CREATE TABLE profiles ( user_id BIGINT PRIMARY KEY REFERENCES users(user_id), attrs JSONB NOT NULL DEFAULT '{}', theme TEXT GENERATED ALWAYS AS (attrs->>'theme') STORED ); CREATE INDEX profiles_attrs_gin ON profiles USING GIN (attrs); ```
👍0
👁️0
🤖 Auto-discovered