Skip to main content
EVOKORE// BROWSE
>

./browse/prompts

163 NODES
πŸ“textβ€’3 hours ago

Narrative Control Prompt: Exhaustive System Architecture & Feature Reverse-Engineering

Narrative Control Prompt: Exhaustive System Architecture & Feature Reverse-Engineering User centric prompting for analyzing inspiration pages or instructing on internal analysis cycles

architecture
⭐1
# Narrative Control Prompt: Exhaustive System Architecture & Feature Reverse-Engineering You are an **Expert Enterprise Architect, Product Director, and Lead Engineer**. Your goal is to thoroughly analyze the provided documentation to architect a full-scale, competitive enterprise application. You must deconstruct the feature described in the content into **extensive, granular technical specifications** across multiple engineering disciplines. **CRITICAL INSTRUCTIONS**: - **DO NOT SUMMARIZE**. Be exhaustive. - For every category below, aim to list **10+ specific items** if possible. - Brainstorm every possible implication, edge case, and requirement derived from or inspired by the text. - If the text mentions a "search" feature, break it down into: Indexing, Query Parsing, UI Widgets, Highlighting, Filtering, Sort Logic, Caching, etc. Please output the analysis in the following Markdown format: # 1. Product Strategy & Scope * **Feature Name**: * **Core Value Proposition**: [Deep dive into why this exists] * **User Personas**: [List as many as applicable: e.g. Admin, Power User, Viewer, Auditor, API Consumer...] * **User Stories**: [Extensive list of 10+ granular user stories e.g. "As a User, I want to..."] * **Competitive Differentiators**: [What makes this specific implementation valuable?] # 2. Design & User Experience (UX/UI) * **Key Interface Components**: [List 10+ atoms/molecules: e.g. Data Grid, Filter Chips, Modals, Tooltips, Empty States, Toasts, Dropdowns...] * **Interaction Patterns**: [List 10+ patterns: e.g. Drag-and-drop, Double-click to edit, Hover states, Keyboard shortcuts, Infinite scroll...] * **Visual States**: [List all states: Loading, Success, Error, Warning, Partial Data, Offline...] * **Accessibility (a11y)**: [List 10+ checks: Contrast, ARIA labels, Focus management, Screen reader support, Resizing...] # 3. Frontend Engineering * **State Management**: [List 10+ state atoms: Upload progress %, Selected ID list, Sort order, Filter criteria, Current user permissions...] * **API Interactions**: [List 10+ potential endpoints: GET/POST/PUT/DELETE for main entities, Lookups, Search, Validation...] * **Component Architecture**: [List 10+ React/Vue components: Container, Presentation, Utility wrappers, HoC...] * **Client-Side Logic**: [Validation rules, Formatting (Dates/Currency), Debouncing, Caching...] # 4. Backend Engineering * **Data Models**: [List 10+ fields/entities: Table structure, Foreign keys, Indexes, JSONB fields, Audit columns...] * **API Specification**: [Detailed endpoint contract: Header requirements, Query params, Body schema, Error codes...] * **Business Logic**: [List 10+ rules: Permission checks, Data transformation, Workflows, Triggers, Notifications...] * **Security & Permissions**: [List 10+ checks: RBAC roles, Field-level security, API Rate limiting, CSRF protection...] # 5. Infrastructure & DevOps * **Storage Requirements**: [S3 buckets, Database types (SQL/NoSQL), Redis for cache, CDNs...] * **Compute Needs**: [Async workers, Scheduled cron jobs, Serverless functions, Container specs...] * **Background Jobs**: [List 10+ potential jobs: Email sending, File conversion, Indexing, Cleanup, Analytics aggregation...] * **Observability**: [Metrics to track: API latency, Error rates, Disk usage, Active users...] # 6. Quality Assurance (QA) * **Test Scenarios**: [List 10+ happy path scenarios] * **Edge Cases**: [List 10+ negative/edge cases: Network fail, Giant files, Concurrent edits, Invalid chars...] * **Performance Metrics**: [Specific SLAs: <200ms API, <1s Page load, 99.9% Uptime...] * **Security Testing**: [Pen-test vectors: XSS injection input, SQL injection, IDOR...] # 7. Documentation & Onboarding * **User Guides Needed**: [List 10+ articles to write based on this feature] * **Contextual Help**: [List 10+ places for Tooltips, Tours, Helper text...] * **API Documentation**: [Swagger/OpenAPI requirements] # 8. Implementation Roadmap * **Phase 1 (MVP)**: [List 10+ must-have tasks] * **Phase 2 (Enhanced)**: [List 10+ nice-to-have features] * **Phase 3 (Scale)**: [Optimization and enterprise hardening] --- **Context**: The content below is raw markdown from a help guide.
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ“textβ€’3 hours ago

Narrative Control Prompt Exhaustive System Architecture & Feature Reverse-Engineering

Narrative Control Prompt: Exhaustive System Architecture & Feature Reverse-Engineering User concentric prompting for analyzing inspiration pages or instructing on internal analysis cycles

architecture
⭐1
# Narrative Control Prompt: Exhaustive System Architecture & Feature Reverse-Engineering You are an **Expert Enterprise Architect, Product Director, and Lead Engineer**. Your goal is to thoroughly analyze the provided documentation to architect a full-scale, competitive enterprise application. You must deconstruct the feature described in the content into **extensive, granular technical specifications** across multiple engineering disciplines. **CRITICAL INSTRUCTIONS**: - **DO NOT SUMMARIZE**. Be exhaustive. - For every category below, aim to list **10+ specific items** if possible. - Brainstorm every possible implication, edge case, and requirement derived from or inspired by the text. - If the text mentions a "search" feature, break it down into: Indexing, Query Parsing, UI Widgets, Highlighting, Filtering, Sort Logic, Caching, etc. Please output the analysis in the following Markdown format: # 1. Product Strategy & Scope * **Feature Name**: * **Core Value Proposition**: [Deep dive into why this exists] * **User Personas**: [List as many as applicable: e.g. Admin, Power User, Viewer, Auditor, API Consumer...] * **User Stories**: [Extensive list of 10+ granular user stories e.g. "As a User, I want to..."] * **Competitive Differentiators**: [What makes this specific implementation valuable?] # 2. Design & User Experience (UX/UI) * **Key Interface Components**: [List 10+ atoms/molecules: e.g. Data Grid, Filter Chips, Modals, Tooltips, Empty States, Toasts, Dropdowns...] * **Interaction Patterns**: [List 10+ patterns: e.g. Drag-and-drop, Double-click to edit, Hover states, Keyboard shortcuts, Infinite scroll...] * **Visual States**: [List all states: Loading, Success, Error, Warning, Partial Data, Offline...] * **Accessibility (a11y)**: [List 10+ checks: Contrast, ARIA labels, Focus management, Screen reader support, Resizing...] # 3. Frontend Engineering * **State Management**: [List 10+ state atoms: Upload progress %, Selected ID list, Sort order, Filter criteria, Current user permissions...] * **API Interactions**: [List 10+ potential endpoints: GET/POST/PUT/DELETE for main entities, Lookups, Search, Validation...] * **Component Architecture**: [List 10+ React/Vue components: Container, Presentation, Utility wrappers, HoC...] * **Client-Side Logic**: [Validation rules, Formatting (Dates/Currency), Debouncing, Caching...] # 4. Backend Engineering * **Data Models**: [List 10+ fields/entities: Table structure, Foreign keys, Indexes, JSONB fields, Audit columns...] * **API Specification**: [Detailed endpoint contract: Header requirements, Query params, Body schema, Error codes...] * **Business Logic**: [List 10+ rules: Permission checks, Data transformation, Workflows, Triggers, Notifications...] * **Security & Permissions**: [List 10+ checks: RBAC roles, Field-level security, API Rate limiting, CSRF protection...] # 5. Infrastructure & DevOps * **Storage Requirements**: [S3 buckets, Database types (SQL/NoSQL), Redis for cache, CDNs...] * **Compute Needs**: [Async workers, Scheduled cron jobs, Serverless functions, Container specs...] * **Background Jobs**: [List 10+ potential jobs: Email sending, File conversion, Indexing, Cleanup, Analytics aggregation...] * **Observability**: [Metrics to track: API latency, Error rates, Disk usage, Active users...] # 6. Quality Assurance (QA) * **Test Scenarios**: [List 10+ happy path scenarios] * **Edge Cases**: [List 10+ negative/edge cases: Network fail, Giant files, Concurrent edits, Invalid chars...] * **Performance Metrics**: [Specific SLAs: <200ms API, <1s Page load, 99.9% Uptime...] * **Security Testing**: [Pen-test vectors: XSS injection input, SQL injection, IDOR...] # 7. Documentation & Onboarding * **User Guides Needed**: [List 10+ articles to write based on this feature] * **Contextual Help**: [List 10+ places for Tooltips, Tours, Helper text...] * **API Documentation**: [Swagger/OpenAPI requirements] # 8. Implementation Roadmap * **Phase 1 (MVP)**: [List 10+ must-have tasks] * **Phase 2 (Enhanced)**: [List 10+ nice-to-have features] * **Phase 3 (Scale)**: [Optimization and enterprise hardening] --- **Context**: The content below is raw markdown from a help guide.
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’6 months ago

Semantic Session Checkpointing Pattern

Record lightweight semantic checkpoints at planning, risk, failure, and handoff boundaries while keeping heartbeat outside the model loop.

productivity
⭐1
# Semantic Session Checkpointing Pattern Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this pattern when session continuity matters and you need checkpoints that survive model drift or hard crashes. ## Use this when - Capturing handoff context during long sessions - Checkpointing before risky refactors - Separating liveness tracking from agent behavior ## Expected outcomes - Checkpoint timing becomes explicit and repeatable - Session heartbeat stays reliable even if the model stalls - Handoffs capture task, next action, files touched, and risk ## Source synthesis - REVOKORE/docs/MCP-Integration.md ## Dedupe notes Uses the compact REVOKORE integration guide as a distinct session-state pattern that is not already covered by EVOKORE-MCP or AGENT33 docs. ## Source excerpts ### REVOKORE/docs/MCP-Integration.md ## Recommended MCP Pattern Expose a tool that writes a short checkpoint into the active session: - current task - next action - files touched - blocker or risk The simplest implementation is to call: ```powershell REVOKORE/scripts/Write-AiCliCheckpoint.ps1 -Kind note -Message "working on auth bug" ``` From an MCP server, you can call the same script directly or append JSON lines to `REVOKORE_CHECKPOINT_PATH`.
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ14
docs
πŸ“textβ€’6 months ago

ARCH-AEP Tiered Remediation Cycle

Run a scope-locked remediation cycle that normalizes findings, revalidates them in parallel, and clears tiers with verification evidence.

architecture
⭐1
# ARCH-AEP Tiered Remediation Cycle Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this workflow when you need an orchestrated engineering review cycle with strict scope lock, tiered execution, and audit-grade evidence. ## Use this when - Large remediation efforts spanning multiple PRs - Parallel specialist review with shared backlog authority - Tracking verification evidence through closure ## Expected outcomes - Scope changes are controlled instead of creeping mid-cycle - Severity tiers drive remediation order predictably - Verification evidence is treated as part of done ## Source synthesis - CHELATEDAI/docs/ARCH AGENTIC ENGINEERING AND PLANNING/workflow.md (https://github.com/mattmre/CHELATEDAI/blob/main/docs/ARCH%20AGENTIC%20ENGINEERING%20AND%20PLANNING/workflow.md) - CHELATEDAI/docs/ARCH AGENTIC ENGINEERING AND PLANNING/orchestrator-briefing.md (https://github.com/mattmre/CHELATEDAI/blob/main/docs/ARCH%20AGENTIC%20ENGINEERING%20AND%20PLANNING/orchestrator-briefing.md) ## Dedupe notes Condenses the core ARCH-AEP workflow and briefing docs into a single remediation-cycle entry instead of importing both separately. ## Source excerpts ### CHELATEDAI/docs/ARCH AGENTIC ENGINEERING AND PLANNING/workflow.md ## Workflow (ARCH phase) 1. Scope lock - Define PR range and time window. - Freeze inputs (refinement report + framework + PR list). 2. Discovery + normalization - Orchestrator ingests `agentic-review-framework.md` and the latest refinement report. - Normalize all findings into a single backlog with unique IDs. - De-duplicate, merge overlaps, and assign provisional severity. - Record backlog in `docs/ARCH AGENTIC ENGINEERING AND PLANNING/backlog-YYYY-MM-DD.md`. 3. Parallel re-validation - Spawn specialist agents to re-validate findings against current main. - Each agent must attach exact file paths and line ranges. - Propose the smallest safe fix, acceptance criteria, and effort sizing (S/M/L). 4. Architecture and planning synthesis - Orchestrator merges validated findings into a master backlog. - Re-score and re-rank using the sorting model. - Identify dependency chains and blockers. ### CHELATEDAI/docs/ARCH AGENTIC ENGINEERING AND PLANNING/orchestrator-briefing.md Purpose: Quick reference for the ARCH-AEP documentation set, plus the narrative to start a new session. Full file index: `docs/INDEX.md` ## What Exists In This Folder - `README.md`: narrative overview and intent for ARCH-AEP. - `workflow.md`: end-to-end workflow specification with phases, guardrails, and enhancements. - `templates.md`: ID and branch conventions, tracker table format, and status log. - `backlog-template.md`: template for the master backlog file. - `backlog-index.md`: index of backlog files. - `next-session.md`: short handoff checklist for resuming work. - `phase-planning.md`: long-running planning record for the current cycle. - `schedule-and-tracking.md`: cadence, gates, and milestone tracking. - `agent-learning.md`: cross-session learnings and reusable patterns. - `change-log.md`: scope/defer decisions with audit context. - `risk-memo-template.md`: Critical/High risk memo template. - `risk-memos/README.md`: storage location for risk memos. - `phase-summary-template.md`: template for per-PR or per-phase summaries. - `phase-summaries/README.md`: storage location for phase summaries. - `verification-log.md`: test/build evidence mirror for PRs. - `tracker-pointer.md`: pointer to the active tracker file. - `tracker-index.md`: index of tracker files. - `scope-lock-t ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ“textβ€’6 months ago

Submodule Hygiene Workflow

Add, update, validate, document, and review git submodule changes without losing track of dependency state.

productivity
⭐1
# Submodule Hygiene Workflow Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this workflow when repositories rely on submodules and you need a disciplined way to update them safely. ## Use this when - Adding or updating repository submodules - Documenting submodule changes alongside code changes - Avoiding broken references during review ## Expected outcomes - Submodule changes are treated as a documented workflow - Validation happens before the review handoff - Dependency movement stays visible to the team ## Source synthesis - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/SUBMODULE_WORKFLOW.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/SUBMODULE_WORKFLOW.md) ## Dedupe notes Uses the dedicated submodule workflow doc because the guidance is operationally specific and not already represented on the site. ## Source excerpts ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/SUBMODULE_WORKFLOW.md This repository may consume external content through git submodules. Use this workflow to keep documentation updates reviewable and predictable. ## 1) Add or Register a Submodule ```bash git submodule add <repo-url> <target-path> git submodule update --init --recursive ``` Commit both: - `.gitmodules` - the submodule pointer change at `<target-path>` ## 2) Pull Latest Submodule Content ```bash git submodule update --remote --merge git submodule update --init --recursive ``` Then inspect: ```bash git status git diff --submodule ``` ## 3) Validate Submodule Cleanliness (Local + CI) Run the same guard used in CI before opening your PR: ```bash git submodule status --recursive node scripts/validate-submodule-cleanliness.js ``` Cleanliness semantics: - `-` => uninitialized submodule - `+` => submodule commit mismatch (worktree vs gitlink pointer) - `U` => submodule merge conflict - dirty submodule worktree => non-empty `git -C <submodule> status --porcelain` Submodule paths can include spaces (for example `SKILLS/ANTHROPIC COOKBOOK`), so always quote path arguments when running manual `git -C` commands. ## 4) Update Docs in This Repo When a submodule changes behavior, update: - `docs/README.md` if canonical links changed - `docs/USAGE.md` / `docs/TROUBLESHOOTING.md` if runtime guidance changed - `README.md` / `CONTRIBUTING.md` if contributor workflow changed ## 5) PR Expectations For submodule-related PRs: 1. Commit inside the submodule first. 2. Return to the parent repo and verify `git submodule status` has no unexpected `-dirty` entries. 3. Commit the updated submodule pointer in the parent repository. 4. Include any matching docs updates in this repository. 5. Mention the upstream submodule commit SHA in the PR description.
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ“textβ€’6 months ago

PR Merge Boundary Validation Runbook

Validate chained pull requests at each merge boundary with explicit checks, stale-approval handling, and rollback awareness.

devops
⭐1
# PR Merge Boundary Validation Runbook Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this runbook when a merge sequence spans dependent pull requests and each boundary needs fresh validation. ## Use this when - Managing dependency-chained pull requests - Refreshing stale approvals near merge time - Reducing merge surprises through checkpoint validation ## Expected outcomes - Each merge boundary has a concrete verification step - Review freshness stays visible as branches evolve - Rollback planning is captured before the merge happens ## Source synthesis - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/PR_MERGE_RUNBOOK.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/PR_MERGE_RUNBOOK.md) ## Dedupe notes Keeps the merge-boundary validation concept separate from more general workflow or orchestration docs. ## Source excerpts ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/PR_MERGE_RUNBOOK.md Operator runbook for reliable merges and context-rot prevention. ## Pre-merge Checklist - [ ] PR scope matches approved plan - [ ] PR description is filled using `.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md` - [ ] PR metadata automation check (`scripts/validate-pr-metadata.js`) is passing for pull_request CI runs - [ ] Required tests pass locally/CI - [ ] Docs updated for user-facing behavior changes - [ ] Release-impacting changes called out - [ ] Follow-up issues captured (if any) ## Required Checks by Change Type Use this as the minimum check set before approval and merge: | Change type | Required checks | | --- | --- | | Docs-only changes | `node test-docs-canonical-links.js` | | Ops/docs process changes (`docs/PR_MERGE_RUNBOOK.md`, `next-session.md`, orchestration docs) | `node test-ops-docs-validation.js` and `node test-docs-canonical-links.js` | | Source/tooling/config changes (`src/`, `scripts/`, workflow/config files) | Relevant targeted tests for touched area plus CI-required suite | | Release-flow changes | `node test-npm-release-flow-validation.js` plus docs/link checks | If a PR spans multiple change types, run the union of required checks. ## Reviewer Responsibilities - Confirm PR scope and dependency assumptions are explicit in description. - Confirm PR metadata fields from `.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md` are complete. - Verify required checks for each change type are attached in PR evidence. - Block approval if dependency base PR is not merged or branch is stale. - Approve only the current chain head; do not pre-approve non-head dependent PRs. - Confirm all review conversations are resolved before final approval. - Ensure merge strategy and rollback notes are documented for risky changes. ## Merge Steps 1. Rebase or update branch with latest target branch. 2. Re-run required validations. 3. Confirm reviewer approvals and resolved conversations. 4. Merge via approved strategy. 5. Record merge commit/PR number in tracker. ## Merge-boundary Checkpoints At every dependency merge boundary (`base -> dependent`): 1. Rebase dependent PR branch on latest `main` immediately after parent merge. 2. Re-run required checks and attach updated evidence in PR metadata. 3. Revalidate approvals for the new head state (stale approvals must be refreshed). 4. Confirm merge-boundary revalidation notes are updated before merge. ## Merge-order Controls (Dependency Chain) 1. Define merge order explicitly in PR descriptions (`base -> dependent`). 2. Merge only the current chain head; hold dependents until parent merge is complete. 3. After each merge, rebase ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ€–system promptβ€’6 months ago

Cross-CLI MCP Config Sync

Keep Claude, Cursor, Gemini, and related CLI integrations aligned with a repeatable dry-run and apply workflow.

productivity
⭐1
# Cross-CLI MCP Config Sync Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this skill when multiple AI clients need the same MCP configuration without drifting out of sync. ## Use this when - Rolling out a shared MCP config to multiple clients - Previewing config changes before applying them - Standardizing developer setup across tools ## Expected outcomes - Cross-client MCP setup becomes easier to repeat - Dry-run and apply modes reduce accidental changes - Environment-specific details stay documented near the workflow ## Source synthesis - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/CLI_INTEGRATION.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/CLI_INTEGRATION.md) ## Dedupe notes Uses the dedicated CLI integration guide as the canonical source for config sync instead of duplicating setup notes elsewhere. ## Source excerpts ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/CLI_INTEGRATION.md EVOKORE-MCP isn't just an MCP Server-Ò€—it also ships with natively integrated UI hooks designed to make your AI CLI experience (like Gemini CLI or Claude Code) significantly more powerful and transparent. ## 🍨 The Interactive Status Line When you connect EVOKORE-MCP to your AI Assistant, you can optionally enable the **EVOKORE Status Line**. Every time the AI finishes a thought or a tool execution, this hook intercepts the internal JSON payload and renders a beautiful, color-coded ASCII status bar at the bottom of your terminal showing: - **Location**: Your current working directory. - **Model Identity**: The exact LLM model currently loaded. - **Skill Count**: A live count of the MCP Agent Skills currently indexed in your library. - **Context Window Health**: A dynamic, color-coded progress bar showing exactly how many tokens you have consumed. --- ### 💜 Enabling in Gemini CLI Gemini CLI features a robust native hook engine. You can configure it to execute the EVOKORE Status Line immediately after every model response (`AfterModel`). **Step 1:** Locate your global settings file (`~/.gemini/settings.json`). **Step 2:** Ensure hooks are enabled, and add the `AfterModel` event array to the root of the JSON object: ```json { "enableHooks": true, "hooks": { "AfterModel": [ { "type": "command", "command": "node /absolute/path/to/EVOKORE-MCP/scripts/status.js" } ] } } ``` **Step 3:** Restart your Gemini CLI! --- ### 💜 Enabling in Claude Code Claude Code features an undocumented internal hook architecture that natively supports this status line. *(Note: Because this feature is currently undocumented by Anthropic, Claude Code's `doctor` command will display "Found 1 settings issue". This is perfectly normal and the status line will still execute successfully)*. **Step 1:** Locate your Claude settings file (`~/.claude/settings.json`). **Step 2:** Add the `statusLine` block to the root of the JSON object: ```json { "statusLine": { "type": "command", "command": "node /absolute/path/to/EVOKORE-MCP/scripts/status.js" } } ``` **Step 3:** Restart Claude Code. --- ### Òő ï¸ A Note on GitHub Copilot and Codex Microsoft's GitHub Copilot CLI and OpenAI's Codex CLI **do not natively support** these JSON hook configurations. If you want the EVOKORE Status Line to appear after commands in these tools, you must configure a native PowerShell/Bash alias wrapper around the CLI execution. **Example (PowerShell Profile):** ```powershell function copilot-evokore { gh copilot $args node "/absolute/path/to/EV ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ€–system promptβ€’6 months ago

Hook Observability and Session Replay

Instrument hooks with replayable logs, task-state visibility, and non-blocking observability around agent sessions.

devops
⭐1
# Hook Observability and Session Replay Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this skill when you need to understand what hooks fired, what they emitted, and how a session can be replayed after the fact. ## Use this when - Debugging hook-driven automation - Replaying session events after failures - Adding observability without blocking interactive work ## Expected outcomes - Hook activity becomes inspectable and replayable - Operational state survives beyond a single terminal session - Observability stays useful without overwhelming operators ## Source synthesis - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/VOICE_AND_HOOKS.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/VOICE_AND_HOOKS.md) - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/USE_CASES_AND_WALKTHROUGHS.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/USE_CASES_AND_WALKTHROUGHS.md) ## Dedupe notes Focuses on replay and observability instead of importing the broader voice-sidecar guide verbatim. ## Source excerpts ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/VOICE_AND_HOOKS.md EVOKORE currently has three separate voice-related systems plus a set of hook and observability utilities. They overlap in operator workflows, but they are not the same runtime. ## The three voice-related systems ### 1. ElevenLabs MCP proxy This is the optional `elevenlabs` child server configured in `mcp.config.json`. What it is: - proxied through the EVOKORE router - exposed as prefixed MCP tools - available to any EVOKORE-connected MCP client when configured successfully What it is for: - text-to-speech and other ElevenLabs MCP operations as tools - routing voice-related actions through the standard EVOKORE proxy/security stack Requirements: - `uvx` available on PATH - `ELEVENLABS_API_KEY` set ### 2. VoiceMode VoiceMode is a separate voice-conversation system for Claude Code. What it is: - registered separately from EVOKORE - not routed through EVOKOREÒ€ℒs stdio server - used for bidirectional voice conversation in Claude Code What it is for: - speaking to Claude and hearing spoken responses - using `OPENAI_API_KEY` and VoiceModeÒ€ℒs own runtime Windows note: - VoiceMode relies on `uvx` being directly available - set `OPENAI_API_KEY` in the shell that launches Claude Code ### 3. VoiceSidecar VoiceSidecar is a standalone WebSocket server implemented in `src/Voice ... ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/USE_CASES_AND_WALKTHROUGHS.md This guide turns the runtime contracts into practical operator flows. ## Walkthrough 1: Adopt a workflow from the skill library Use this when you want EVOKORE to retrieve process guidance before the model starts acting. ### Goal Find and adopt an existing workflow such as `session-wrap`. ### Steps 1. Ask the client to search skills: ```text Search the MCP for a workflow about session wrap-up and continuity. ``` 2. EVOKORE uses `search_skills` and returns matching skills. 3. Ask for a specific skill: ```text Show me help for the session-wrap skill. ``` 4. EVOKORE uses `get_skill_help` and returns the skillÒ€ℒs internal instructions. 5. For broader task matching, ask: ```text Resolve a workflow for wrapping this session, documenting open risks, and preparing the next handoff. ``` 6. EVOKORE uses `resolve_workflow` and injects the top 1-3 relevant workflows directly into the tool response. ### Why this matters - keeps the model grounded in repo-specific process - reduces prompt drift - makes handoff and governance behavior repeatable ## Walkthrough 2: Use a proxied tool that requires HITL approval Use this when the tool is configured as `require_approval` in `permissions.yml`. ### Goal Allow a protected proxied tool call such as `fs_write_f ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ€–system promptβ€’6 months ago

Multi-Server MCP Aggregation Pattern

Aggregate tools across multiple MCP child servers with prefixing, collision avoidance, and routing rules that stay deterministic.

architecture
⭐1
# Multi-Server MCP Aggregation Pattern Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this pattern when an MCP host must broker tools from multiple child servers without sacrificing clarity or control. ## Use this when - Combining tools from several MCP backends - Avoiding tool-name collisions across providers - Keeping origin and routing visible during execution ## Expected outcomes - Server-prefixed names make tool origins obvious - Collisions are avoided without brittle manual renaming - Operators can extend the tool surface without losing determinism ## Source synthesis - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/AGENT33_IMPROVEMENT_INSTRUCTIONS.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/AGENT33_IMPROVEMENT_INSTRUCTIONS.md) - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/TOOLS_AND_DISCOVERY.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/TOOLS_AND_DISCOVERY.md) ## Dedupe notes Uses the improvement-transfer doc as the primary source, with the discovery doc covering prefixing and compatibility details. ## Source excerpts ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/AGENT33_IMPROVEMENT_INSTRUCTIONS.md > **Purpose**: Feed this file into Claude Code CLI when working on the Agent33 repo. It contains patterns, architectures, and capabilities proven in EVOKORE-MCP that Agent33 should adopt. --- ## 1. Multi-Server MCP Aggregation Pattern **What Agent33 lacks**: Agent33's MCP server (Phase 43) is a single-endpoint bridge. It doesn't aggregate multiple child MCP servers behind a unified namespace. **What to build**: A proxy layer that spawns and manages multiple child MCP servers from a single config file, presenting them as one unified tool surface. ### Implementation spec: ``` mcp.config.json { "servers": { "github": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-github"], "env": { "GITHUB_TOKEN": "${GITHUB_TOKEN}" } }, "fs": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem", "./"] }, "elevenlabs": { "command": "uvx", "args": ["elevenlabs-mcp"], "env": { "ELEVENLABS_API_KEY": "${ELEVENLABS_API_KEY}" } } } } ``` **Key patterns from EVOKORE**: - **Tool name prefixing**: Every proxied tool gets renamed `{serverId}_{originalName}` to prevent namespace collisions (e.g., `github_create_issue`, `fs_read_file`). First-registration-wins for duplicates. - **Environment interpolation**: `${VAR}` syntax in `env` blocks resolved ... ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/TOOLS_AND_DISCOVERY.md This page explains how EVOKORE presents tools, how proxy names are built, and how `discover_tools` changes the visible tool surface. ## Two tool populations ### Native EVOKORE tools These tools are defined by EVOKORE itself: - `docs_architect` - `skill_creator` - `resolve_workflow` - `search_skills` - `get_skill_help` - `discover_tools` Properties: - always available - always visible - not subject to proxy prefixing ### Proxied child-server tools These come from child servers in `mcp.config.json`. Current configured sources: - `github` - `fs` - optional `elevenlabs` Properties: - fetched from child servers at startup - renamed with server prefixes - governed by `permissions.yml` - routed through `ProxyManager` ## Prefixing and compatibility EVOKORE rewrites proxied tool names to: ```text ${serverId}_${tool.name} ``` Why this exists: - prevents tool-name collisions across child servers - makes origin obvious during execution and review - keeps exact-name routing deterministic Examples: | Upstream tool | EVOKORE-exposed tool | |---|---| | `read_file` from `fs` | `fs_read_file` | | `create_issue` from `github` | `github_create_issue` | ### Duplicate-prefixed name policy If two child registrations would create the same final prefixed name: - the first registrati ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ€–system promptβ€’6 months ago

Human-in-the-Loop Approval Token Workflow

Gate risky tool execution behind approval tokens so agents can retry safely after a human reviewer signs off.

security
⭐1
# Human-in-the-Loop Approval Token Workflow Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this workflow when autonomous execution needs a durable handoff from human review back into the agent loop. ## Use this when - Retrying a blocked tool call after approval - Adding a human checkpoint to sensitive actions - Reducing insecure workarounds around approval flows ## Expected outcomes - Approval becomes a reusable tokenized workflow - Agents resume work without losing execution context - Security controls stay explicit instead of being implied ## Source synthesis - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/V2_MULTI_AGENT_WORKFLOWS.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/V2_MULTI_AGENT_WORKFLOWS.md) - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/AGENT33_IMPROVEMENT_INSTRUCTIONS.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/AGENT33_IMPROVEMENT_INSTRUCTIONS.md) ## Dedupe notes Synthesizes the approval-token concept from the main workflow doc and the Agent33 improvement transfer notes. ## Source excerpts ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/V2_MULTI_AGENT_WORKFLOWS.md With EVOKORE-MCP v2.0 fully operational, we can now leverage 40+ proxied GitHub and Filesystem tools seamlessly within complex multi-agent workflows. The core architectural advancements include: ## 1. Dynamic Tool Prefixing & Indexing Instead of loading 40+ tools into an LLM's context window statically (which causes massive bloat), EVOKORE's `ProxyManager` boots child servers (like `@modelcontextprotocol/server-github` and `@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem`) and dynamically prefixes their tools (`github_create_issue`, `fs_write_file`). This prevents namespace collisions while keeping the tools accessible to native skills. ## 2. Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) Security Interceptor Automated multi-agent workflows involving sensitive endpoints (like GitHub write access or file deletion) are governed by EVOKORE's stateless `_evokore_approval_token` architecture. - When an agent attempts a restricted action, the tool call is intercepted and blocked. - The server returns an error explicitly commanding the agent to prompt the human for approval. - Upon approval, the agent retries the exact tool call with the injected token, securely fulfilling the workflow without severing the conversational context. ## 3. Active Skill Orchestration (Native Harnessing) Unlike v1.0 where skills merel ... ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/AGENT33_IMPROVEMENT_INSTRUCTIONS.md > **Purpose**: Feed this file into Claude Code CLI when working on the Agent33 repo. It contains patterns, architectures, and capabilities proven in EVOKORE-MCP that Agent33 should adopt. --- ## 1. Multi-Server MCP Aggregation Pattern **What Agent33 lacks**: Agent33's MCP server (Phase 43) is a single-endpoint bridge. It doesn't aggregate multiple child MCP servers behind a unified namespace. **What to build**: A proxy layer that spawns and manages multiple child MCP servers from a single config file, presenting them as one unified tool surface. ### Implementation spec: ``` mcp.config.json { "servers": { "github": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-github"], "env": { "GITHUB_TOKEN": "${GITHUB_TOKEN}" } }, "fs": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem", "./"] }, "elevenlabs": { "command": "uvx", "args": ["elevenlabs-mcp"], "env": { "ELEVENLABS_API_KEY": "${ELEVENLABS_API_KEY}" } } } } ``` **Key patterns from EVOKORE**: - **Tool name prefixing**: Every proxied tool gets renamed `{serverId}_{originalName}` to prevent namespace collisions (e.g., `github_create_issue`, `fs_read_file`). First-registration-wins for duplicates. - **Environment interpolation**: `${VAR}` syntax in `env` blocks resolved ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ€–system promptβ€’6 months ago

Dynamic Tool Discovery and Session Activation

Expose only native tools at session start, then activate proxied tools on demand through a searchable discovery layer.

architecture
⭐1
# Dynamic Tool Discovery and Session Activation Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this skill when you need smaller tool payloads, exact-name compatibility, and session-scoped tool activation. ## Use this when - Reducing tool-list bloat for focused sessions - Preserving exact-name tool calls while hiding noise - Activating proxied tools only when a task requires them ## Expected outcomes - Discovery changes listing visibility without breaking routing - Session-scoped activation keeps tools relevant to the task - Operators can trade compatibility against payload size intentionally ## Source synthesis - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/TOOLS_AND_DISCOVERY.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/TOOLS_AND_DISCOVERY.md) ## Dedupe notes Uses the canonical EVOKORE-MCP discovery doc instead of duplicating the same concept from walkthrough and migration docs. ## Source excerpts ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/TOOLS_AND_DISCOVERY.md This page explains how EVOKORE presents tools, how proxy names are built, and how `discover_tools` changes the visible tool surface. ## Two tool populations ### Native EVOKORE tools These tools are defined by EVOKORE itself: - `docs_architect` - `skill_creator` - `resolve_workflow` - `search_skills` - `get_skill_help` - `discover_tools` Properties: - always available - always visible - not subject to proxy prefixing ### Proxied child-server tools These come from child servers in `mcp.config.json`. Current configured sources: - `github` - `fs` - optional `elevenlabs` Properties: - fetched from child servers at startup - renamed with server prefixes - governed by `permissions.yml` - routed through `ProxyManager` ## Prefixing and compatibility EVOKORE rewrites proxied tool names to: ```text ${serverId}_${tool.name} ``` Why this exists: - prevents tool-name collisions across child servers - makes origin obvious during execution and review - keeps exact-name routing deterministic Examples: | Upstream tool | EVOKORE-exposed tool | |---|---| | `read_file` from `fs` | `fs_read_file` | | `create_issue` from `github` | `github_create_issue` | ### Duplicate-prefixed name policy If two child registrations would create the same final prefixed name: - the first registration wins - later duplicates are skipped - EVOKORE logs a warning and duplicate summary ## Discovery modes | Mode | What `tools/list` returns | Best for | |---|---|---| | `legacy` | all native + proxied tools | maximum compatibility | | `dynamic` | native tools + session-activated proxied tools | smaller initial tool payloads | Environment toggle: ```bash EVOKORE_TOOL_DISCOVERY_MODE=legacy EVOKORE_TOOL_DISCOVERY_MODE=dynamic ``` ## Dynamic discovery lifecycle In `dynamic` mode, EVOKORE uses a session-scoped activation set. Lifecycle: 1. session starts with only native tools visible 2. user/model calls `discover_tools` 3. `ToolCatalogIndex` searches the merged native + proxied catalog 4. matching proxied tools are activated for that session 5. EVOKORE emits `sendToolListChanged()` best-effort 6. client re-runs `tools/list` or auto-refreshes ```mermaid flowchart TD A[Session starts in dynamic mode] --> B[tools/list shows native tools] B --> C[discover_tools query] C --> D[ToolCatalogIndex searches merged catalog] D --> E[Matching proxied tools added to session activation set] E --> F[sendToolListChanged best-effort] F --> G[Client refreshes tools/list] G --> H[Activated proxied tools now visible] D --> I[Exact-name proxied call still works eve ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ“textβ€’6 months ago

Docker-Backed Jupyter Kernel Operator

Operate containerized Jupyter kernels with enablement, smoke checks, cleanup, and failure handling baked into the runbook.

devops
⭐1
# Docker-Backed Jupyter Kernel Operator Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this runbook when you need isolated notebook execution, clear container lifecycle management, and troubleshooting guidance. ## Use this when - Enabling containerized notebook workflows - Cleaning up kernel containers safely - Troubleshooting notebook execution environments ## Expected outcomes - Kernel startup and cleanup steps are documented end-to-end - Failure modes are easier to diagnose - Notebook execution can be repeated without manual guesswork ## Source synthesis - AGENT33/docs/runbooks/jupyter-kernel-containers.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/runbooks/jupyter-kernel-containers.md) ## Dedupe notes Uses the AGENT33 Jupyter container runbook as a focused operations import without duplicating broader walkthroughs. ## Source excerpts ### AGENT33/docs/runbooks/jupyter-kernel-containers.md ## Purpose Operate the Docker-backed Jupyter kernel adapter introduced for Phase 38 Stage 3 / Phase 42 follow-on work. ## Enablement Set: - `JUPYTER_KERNEL_ENABLED=true` - `JUPYTER_KERNEL_MODE=docker` Optional settings: - `JUPYTER_KERNEL_DOCKER_IMAGE` - `JUPYTER_KERNEL_ALLOWED_IMAGES` - `JUPYTER_KERNEL_NETWORK_ENABLED` - `JUPYTER_KERNEL_MOUNT_WORKDIR` - `JUPYTER_KERNEL_CONTAINER_WORKDIR` ## Operational Notes - Docker mode publishes kernel ports to the host and mounts a per-session runtime directory containing the Jupyter connection file. - When `JUPYTER_KERNEL_NETWORK_ENABLED=false`, the adapter starts containers with `--network none`. - Working-directory mounting is opt-in and should only point at paths already approved by workflow / execution policy. - The adapter enforces an image allowlist when one is configured. ## Failure Modes - `jupyter_client not installed`: install with `pip install agent33[jupyter]` - `docker executable not found`: install Docker and ensure `docker` is on `PATH` - `Docker image ... is not permitted`: align the requested image with `JUPYTER_KERNEL_ALLOWED_IMAGES` - kernel startup timeout: inspect Docker logs for the session container and verify the image includes `ipykernel` ## Cleanup - One-shot sessions are removed after execution. - Stateful sessions are removed explicitly or via adapter shutdown. - Forced cleanup uses `docker rm -f <container>` and deletes the runtime connection directory. ## Quick Smoke Workflow Register a minimal workflow that exercises the Docker-backed `code-interpreter` tool: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/workflows/ \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{ "name": "docker-kernel-smoke", "version": "1.0.0", "description": "Validate Docker-backed Jupyter execution", "triggers": {"manual": true}, "inputs": {}, "outputs": { "result": {"type": "object"} }, "steps": [ { "id": "run-notebook-code", "action": "execute-code", "inputs": { "tool_id": "code-interpreter", "language": "python", "code": "print(6 * 7)" } } ], "execution": {"mode": "sequential"} }' ``` Then execute it: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/workflows/docker-kernel-smoke/execute \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"inputs": {}}' ```
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ“textβ€’6 months ago

Improvement Cycle Review Wizard

Run a live improvement-cycle workflow that links review artifacts, approvals, tool requests, and operator checkpoints.

productivity
⭐1
# Improvement Cycle Review Wizard Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this workflow when an operator needs a guided improvement cycle with live status, explicit approvals, and linked artifacts. ## Use this when - Operational review sessions with live progress - Approval-heavy improvement cycles - Coordinating review artifacts with execution steps ## Expected outcomes - Live workflow execution remains visible to operators - Artifacts, approvals, and tool requests stay connected - Improvement loops become easier to audit and rerun ## Source synthesis - AGENT33/docs/phase25-26-live-review-walkthrough.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/phase25-26-live-review-walkthrough.md) - AGENT33/docs/operator-improvement-cycle-and-jupyter.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/operator-improvement-cycle-and-jupyter.md) ## Dedupe notes Merges AGENT33 live review walkthrough details with the shorter operator-focused improvement-cycle guide. ## Source excerpts ### AGENT33/docs/phase25-26-live-review-walkthrough.md This guide documents the operator flow introduced by the Phase 25 live workflow transport and the Phase 26/27 improvement-cycle review wizard stack. ## Scope - Live workflow execution with run-scoped graph refresh - WebSocket-first status streaming with authenticated SSE fallback - Improvement-cycle preset creation - Explanation artifact generation for `plan_review` and `diff_review` - Linked review creation, risk assessment, L1/L2 signoff, and final approval - Pending tool-approval triage inside the same workflow domain > Note > This walkthrough reflects the review stack built on `codex/session58-phase26-wizard` and validated in `codex/session60-phase22-docs-validation`. If the related PRs are still open, `main` may not yet expose every surface described here. ## Operator Flow ```mermaid sequenceDiagram participant UI as "Frontend Control Plane" participant WF as "Workflow APIs" participant VIZ as "Visualization APIs" participant EXP as "Explanation APIs" participant REV as "Review APIs" participant HITL as "Tool Approval APIs" UI->>WF: "POST /v1/workflows/{name}/execute (single mode, caller run_id)" UI->>VIZ: "GET /v1/visualizations/workflows/{workflow_id}/graph?run_id=..." UI->>WF: "WS /v1/workflows/{run_id}/ws" alt "WebSocket unav ... ### AGENT33/docs/operator-improvement-cycle-and-jupyter.md This guide covers the merged operator surfaces for: - the Phase 26 improvement-cycle review wizard - the Phase 27 canonical workflow presets - the Phase 38 Docker-backed Jupyter kernel workflow Use it when you want the shortest current path from UI entry point to a real workflow run. ## 1. Improvement-Cycle Wizard The wizard is mounted inside the frontend control plane under the `Workflows` domain. ### Entry path 1. Open the frontend at `http://localhost:3000` 2. Authenticate with a bearer token or API key 3. Open `Advanced Settings` 4. Select the `Workflows` domain 5. Use the `Improvement Cycle Wizard` panel at the top of the page ### What the wizard does The wizard stitches together the backend surfaces that previously had to be called manually: - plan review / diff review generation - review creation and risk assessment - L1 and L2 review submission - tool approval request review and decision capture Reference implementation: - frontend: `frontend/src/features/improvement-cycle/ImprovementCycleWizard.tsx` - tests: `frontend/src/features/improvement-cycle/ImprovementCycleWizard.test.tsx` For the detailed review flow, keep using: - [`phase25-26-live-review-walkthrough.md`](phase25-26-live-review-walkthrough.md) ## 2. Canonical Workflow Presets The `Workflows` doma ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ“textβ€’6 months ago

Evaluation and Regression Gate

Create evaluation runs, submit results, compute metrics, save baselines, and triage regressions before shipping changes.

analysis
⭐1
# Evaluation and Regression Gate Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this workflow to formalize benchmarking, regression detection, and baseline management around agent or product changes. ## Use this when - Validating changes against prior baselines - Making regressions visible before rollout - Capturing repeatable evaluation evidence ## Expected outcomes - Evaluation runs produce comparable metrics - Baselines are stored after successful validation - Regression triage becomes a workflow instead of an afterthought ## Source synthesis - AGENT33/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md) - AGENT33/docs/use-cases.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/use-cases.md) ## Dedupe notes Combines AGENT33 evaluation lifecycle definitions with evaluation and regression use-case framing. ## Source excerpts ### AGENT33/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md ### 4.3 Evaluation Lifecycle Flow: 1. Create run (`/v1/evaluations/runs`) 2. Submit task results (`/runs/{id}/results`) 3. Compute metrics + gate report 4. Save baseline (`/runs/{id}/baseline`) 5. Triage/resolve regressions ### AGENT33/docs/use-cases.md ## 4. Evaluation and Regression Gates Goal: - Quantify quality and block regressions across PR/merge/release gates. Use these modules: - `api/routes/evaluations.py` - `evaluation/service.py` - `evaluation/gates.py` - `evaluation/regression.py` Typical flow: 1. Create run for gate type (`G-PR`, `G-MRG`, `G-REL`, `G-MON`). 2. Submit task results and quality metadata. 3. Compute metrics and gate verdict. 4. Save baseline for future comparison. 5. Triage/resolve regression records. Best fit: - Teams with golden-task style quality gates.
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ“textβ€’6 months ago

Autonomy Budget Lifecycle

Define, approve, enforce, and escalate autonomous execution budgets before agents act on files, commands, or network requests.

productivity
⭐1
# Autonomy Budget Lifecycle Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this lifecycle when you need bounded autonomous execution with approvals, preflight checks, and runtime enforcement. ## Use this when - Running agents with scoped permissions - Escalating risky actions instead of silently proceeding - Adding governance to autonomous sessions ## Expected outcomes - Autonomy state moves through draft, approval, and active phases - Preflight checks happen before execution begins - Escalations are tracked instead of disappearing into logs ## Source synthesis - AGENT33/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md) - AGENT33/docs/use-cases.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/use-cases.md) ## Dedupe notes Collapses autonomy lifecycle and use-case material into a single execution-governance entry. ## Source excerpts ### AGENT33/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md ### 4.4 Autonomy Budget Lifecycle States: - `draft -> pending_approval -> active -> suspended|expired|completed` Flow: 1. Create budget 2. Activate or transition 3. Run preflight checks 4. Create enforcer 5. Evaluate command/file/network requests 6. Track escalations ### AGENT33/docs/use-cases.md ## 3. Autonomous Execution Budgeting Goal: - Enforce hard runtime limits for file, command, and network activity. Use these modules: - `api/routes/autonomy.py` - `autonomy/service.py` - `autonomy/enforcement.py` - `autonomy/preflight.py` Typical flow: 1. Create and activate budget. 2. Run preflight checks. 3. Attach runtime enforcer. 4. Gate each file/command/network action through enforcement APIs. 5. Trigger and resolve escalations. Best fit: - High-control automation in regulated or sensitive environments.
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ“textβ€’6 months ago

Release Command Center Workflow

Coordinate release freezes, candidate promotion, validation, publication, and rollback handling through a defined state model.

devops
⭐1
# Release Command Center Workflow Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this workflow to move a release from planning to publication with explicit validation checkpoints and rollback branches. ## Use this when - Managing release freezes and candidate promotion - Tracking validation state before publication - Documenting rollback-friendly release operations ## Expected outcomes - Release state changes are visible and repeatable - Rollback paths are treated as first-class outcomes - Validation discipline is preserved between phases ## Source synthesis - AGENT33/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md) - AGENT33/docs/use-cases.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/use-cases.md) ## Dedupe notes Merges AGENT33 release lifecycle details with release-oriented use-case guidance. ## Source excerpts ### AGENT33/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md ### 4.2 Release Lifecycle States: - `planned -> frozen -> rc -> validating -> released` - Failure/rollback branches: `failed`, `rolled_back` Main APIs: - `/v1/releases/{id}/freeze` - `/v1/releases/{id}/rc` - `/v1/releases/{id}/validate` - `/v1/releases/{id}/publish` - `/v1/releases/{id}/rollback` ### AGENT33/docs/use-cases.md ## 2. Release Command Center Goal: - Move releases through frozen -> RC -> validate -> publish with checklist controls. Use these modules: - `api/routes/releases.py` - `release/service.py` - `release/checklist.py` - `release/sync.py` - `release/rollback.py` Typical flow: 1. Create release (`POST /v1/releases`). 2. Freeze, cut RC, validate. 3. Update/evaluate checklist items. 4. Publish when checks pass. 5. Run sync dry-runs or real syncs. 6. Initiate rollback if needed. Best fit: - Teams with repeatable release compliance requirements.
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ“textβ€’6 months ago

Guardrailed Code Review Pipeline

Run a staged code review workflow with explicit risk assessment, reviewer handoffs, and merge gates.

coding
⭐1
# Guardrailed Code Review Pipeline Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this workflow when a change needs structured review evidence, clear approval stages, and a rollback-aware path to merge. ## Use this when - Multi-step L1 and L2 review signoff - High-risk changes that need audit trails - Standardizing reviewer decisions before merge ## Expected outcomes - Review states and approval checkpoints stay explicit - Risk assessment and evidence are captured before merge - The workflow remains small enough to reuse across repositories ## Source synthesis - AGENT33/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md) - AGENT33/docs/walkthroughs.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/walkthroughs.md) ## Dedupe notes Combines AGENT33 lifecycle mapping and operator walkthrough material into one review-oriented site entry. ## Source excerpts ### AGENT33/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md ### 4.1 Review Lifecycle States: - `draft -> ready -> l1-review -> l1-approved -> (optional l2-review -> l2-approved) -> approved -> merged` Main APIs: - `/v1/reviews/{id}/assess` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/assign-l1` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/l1` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/assign-l2` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/l2` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/approve` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/merge` ### AGENT33/docs/walkthroughs.md ## 4. Review Lifecycle (Two-Layer Signoff) Create review: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/ \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"task_id":"TASK-101","branch":"feat/docs-refresh","pr_number":12}' ``` Assess risk: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/assess \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"triggers":["api-public","security"]}' ``` Move to ready and assign L1: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/ready -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/assign-l1 -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" ``` Submit L1 decision: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/l1 \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"decision":"approved","issues":[],"comments":"L1 pass"}' ``` If L2 required, continue: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/assign-l2 -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/l2 \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"decision":"approved","issues":[],"commen ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

workflow-orchestration-patterns

Design durable workflows with Temporal for distributed systems.

coding
⭐1
# Workflow Orchestration Patterns Master workflow orchestration architecture with Temporal, covering fundamental design decisions, resilience patterns, and best practices for building reliable distributed systems. ## When to Use Workflow Orchestration ### Ideal Use Cases (Source: docs.temporal.io) - **Multi-step processes** spanning machines/services/databases - **Distributed transactions** requiring all-or-nothing semantics - **Long-running workflows** (hours to years) with automatic state persistence - **Failure recovery** that must resume from last successful step - **Business processes**: bookings, orders, campaigns, approvals - **Entity lifecycle management**: inventory tracking, account management, cart workflows - **Infrastructure automation**: CI/CD pipelines, provisioning, deployments - **Human-in-the-loop** systems requiring timeouts and escalations ### When NOT to Use - Simple CRUD operations (use direct API calls) - Pure data processing pipelines (use Airflow, batch processing) - Stateless request/response (use standard APIs) - Real-time streaming (use Kafka, event processors) ## Critical Design Decision: Workflows vs Activities **The Fundamental Rule** (Source: temporal.io/blog/workflow-engine-principles): - **Workflows** = Orchestration logic and decision-making - **Activities** = External interactions (APIs, databases, network calls) ### Workflows (Orchestration) **Characteristics:** - Contain business logic and coordination - **MUST be deterministic** (same inputs β†’ same outputs) - **Cannot** perform direct external calls - State automatically preserved across failures - Can run for years despite infrastructure failures **Example workflow tasks:** - Decide which steps to execute - Handle compensation logic - Manage timeouts and retries - Coordinate child workflows ### Activities (External Interactions) **Characteristics:** - Handle all external system interactions - Can be non-deterministic (API calls, DB writes) - Include built-in timeouts and retry logic - **Must be idempotent** (calling N times = calling once) - Short-lived (seconds to minutes typically) **Example activity tasks:** - Call payment gateway API - Write to database - Send emails or notifications - Query external services ### Design Decision Framework ``` Does it touch external systems? β†’ Activity Is it orchestration/decision logic? β†’ Workflow ``` ## Core Workflow Patterns ### 1. Saga Pattern with Compensation **Purpose**: Implement distributed transactions with rollback capability **Pattern** (Source: temporal.io/blog/compensating-actions-part-of-a-complete-breakfast-with-sagas): ``` For each step: 1. Register compensation BEFORE executing 2. Execute the step (via activity) 3. On failure, run all compensations in reverse order (LIFO) ``` **Example: Payment Workflow** 1. Reserve inventory (compensation: release inventory) 2. Charge payment (compensation: refund payment) 3. Fulfill order (compensation: cancel fulfillment) **Critical Requirements:** - Compensations must be idempotent - Register compensation BEFORE executing step - Run compensations in reverse order - Handle partial failures gracefully ### 2. Entity Workflows (Actor Model) **Purpose**: Long-lived workflow representing single entity instance **Pattern** (Source: docs.temporal.io/evaluate/use-cases-design-patterns): - One workflow execution = one entity (cart, account, inventory item) - Workflow persists for entity lifetime - Receives signals for state changes - Supports queries for current state **Example Use Cases:** - Shopping cart (add items, checkout, expiration) - Bank account (deposits, withdrawals, balance checks) - Product inventory (stock updates, reservations) **Benefits:** - Encapsulates entity behavior - Guarantees consistency per entity - Natural event sourcing ### 3. Fan-Out/Fan-In (Parallel Execution) **Purpose**: Execute multiple tasks in parallel, aggregate results **Pattern:** - Spawn child workflows or parallel activities - Wait for all to complete - Aggregate results - Handle partial failures **Scaling Rule** (Source: temporal.io/blog/workflow-engine-principles): - Don't scale individual workflows - For 1M tasks: spawn 1K child workflows Γ— 1K tasks each - Keep each workflow bounded ### 4. Async Callback Pattern **Purpose**: Wait for external event or human approval **Pattern:** - Workflow sends request and waits for signal - External system processes asynchronously - Sends signal to resume workflow - Workflow continues with response **Use Cases:** - Human approval workflows - Webhook callbacks - Long-running external processes ## State Management and Determinism ### Automatic State Preservation **How Temporal Works** (Source: docs.temporal.io/workflows): - Complete program state preserved automatically - Event History records every command and event - Seamless recovery from crashes - Applications restore pre-failure state ### Determinism Constraints **Workflows Execute as State Machines**: - Replay behavior must be consistent - Same inputs β†’ identical outputs every time **Prohibited in Workflows** (Source: docs.temporal.io/workflows): - ❌ Threading, locks, synchronization primitives - ❌ Random number generation (`random()`) - ❌ Global state or static variables - ❌ System time (`datetime.now()`) - ❌ Direct file I/O or network calls - ❌ Non-deterministic libraries **Allowed in Workflows**: - βœ… `workflow.now()` (deterministic time) - βœ… `workflow.random()` (deterministic random) - βœ… Pure functions and calculations - βœ… Calling activities (non-deterministic operations) ### Versioning Strategies **Challenge**: Changing workflow code while old executions still running **Solutions**: 1. **Versioning API**: Use `workflow.get_version()` for safe changes 2. **New Workflow Type**: Create new workflow, route new executions to it 3. **Backward Compatibility**: Ensure old events replay correctly ## Resilience and Error Handling ### Retry Policies **Default Behavior**: Temporal retries activities forever **Configure Retry**: - Initial retry interval - Backoff coefficient (exponential backoff) - Maximum interval (cap retry delay) - Maximum attempts (eventually fail) **Non-Retryable Errors**: - Invalid input (validation failures) - Business rule violations - Permanent failures (resource not found) ### Idempotency Requirements **Why Critical** (Source: docs.temporal.io/activities): - Activities may execute multiple times - Network failures trigger retries - Duplicate execution must be safe **Implementation Strategies**: - Idempotency keys (deduplication) - Check-then-act with unique constraints - Upsert operations instead of insert - Track processed request IDs ### Activity Heartbeats **Purpose**: Detect stalled long-running activities **Pattern**: - Activity sends periodic heartbeat - Includes progress information - Timeout if no heartbeat received - Enables progress-based retry ## Best Practices ### Workflow Design 1. **Keep workflows focused** - Single responsibility per workflow 2. **Small workflows** - Use child workflows for scalability 3. **Clear boundaries** - Workflow orchestrates, activities execute 4. **Test locally** - Use time-skipping test environment ### Activity Design 1. **Idempotent operations** - Safe to retry 2. **Short-lived** - Seconds to minutes, not hours 3. **Timeout configuration** - Always set timeouts 4. **Heartbeat for long tasks** - Report progress 5. **Error handling** - Distinguish retryable vs non-retryable ### Common Pitfalls **Workflow Violations**: - Using `datetime.now()` instead of `workflow.now()` - Threading or async operations in workflow code - Calling external APIs directly from workflow - Non-deterministic logic in workflows **Activity Mistakes**: - Non-idempotent operations (can't handle retries) - Missing timeouts (activities run forever) - No error classification (retry validation errors) - Ignoring payload limits (2MB per argument) ### Operational Considerations **Monitoring**: - Workflow execution duration - Activity failure rates - Retry attempts and backoff - Pending workflow counts **Scalability**: - Horizontal scaling with workers - Task queue partitioning - Child workflow decomposition - Activity batching when appropriate ## Additional Resources **Official Documentation**: - Temporal Core Concepts: docs.temporal.io/workflows - Workflow Patterns: docs.temporal.io/evaluate/use-cases-design-patterns - Best Practices: docs.temporal.io/develop/best-practices - Saga Pattern: temporal.io/blog/saga-pattern-made-easy **Key Principles**: 1. Workflows = orchestration, Activities = external calls 2. Determinism is non-negotiable for workflows 3. Idempotency is critical for activities 4. State preservation is automatic 5. Design for failure and recovery
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

temporal-python-testing

Test Temporal workflows with pytest, time-skipping, and mocking

coding
⭐1
# Temporal Python Testing Strategies Comprehensive testing approaches for Temporal workflows using pytest, progressive disclosure resources for specific testing scenarios. ## When to Use This Skill - **Unit testing workflows** - Fast tests with time-skipping - **Integration testing** - Workflows with mocked activities - **Replay testing** - Validate determinism against production histories - **Local development** - Set up Temporal server and pytest - **CI/CD integration** - Automated testing pipelines - **Coverage strategies** - Achieve β‰₯80% test coverage ## Testing Philosophy **Recommended Approach** (Source: docs.temporal.io/develop/python/testing-suite): - Write majority as integration tests - Use pytest with async fixtures - Time-skipping enables fast feedback (month-long workflows β†’ seconds) - Mock activities to isolate workflow logic - Validate determinism with replay testing **Three Test Types**: 1. **Unit**: Workflows with time-skipping, activities with ActivityEnvironment 2. **Integration**: Workers with mocked activities 3. **End-to-end**: Full Temporal server with real activities (use sparingly) ## Available Resources This skill provides detailed guidance through progressive disclosure. Load specific resources based on your testing needs: ### Unit Testing Resources **File**: `resources/unit-testing.md` **When to load**: Testing individual workflows or activities in isolation **Contains**: - WorkflowEnvironment with time-skipping - ActivityEnvironment for activity testing - Fast execution of long-running workflows - Manual time advancement patterns - pytest fixtures and patterns ### Integration Testing Resources **File**: `resources/integration-testing.md` **When to load**: Testing workflows with mocked external dependencies **Contains**: - Activity mocking strategies - Error injection patterns - Multi-activity workflow testing - Signal and query testing - Coverage strategies ### Replay Testing Resources **File**: `resources/replay-testing.md` **When to load**: Validating determinism or deploying workflow changes **Contains**: - Determinism validation - Production history replay - CI/CD integration patterns - Version compatibility testing ### Local Development Resources **File**: `resources/local-setup.md` **When to load**: Setting up development environment **Contains**: - Docker Compose configuration - pytest setup and configuration - Coverage tool integration - Development workflow ## Quick Start Guide ### Basic Workflow Test ```python import pytest from temporalio.testing import WorkflowEnvironment from temporalio.worker import Worker @pytest.fixture async def workflow_env(): env = await WorkflowEnvironment.start_time_skipping() yield env await env.shutdown() @pytest.mark.asyncio async def test_workflow(workflow_env): async with Worker( workflow_env.client, task_queue="test-queue", workflows=[YourWorkflow], activities=[your_activity], ): result = await workflow_env.client.execute_workflow( YourWorkflow.run, args, id="test-wf-id", task_queue="test-queue", ) assert result == expected ``` ### Basic Activity Test ```python from temporalio.testing import ActivityEnvironment async def test_activity(): env = ActivityEnvironment() result = await env.run(your_activity, "test-input") assert result == expected_output ``` ## Coverage Targets **Recommended Coverage** (Source: docs.temporal.io best practices): - **Workflows**: β‰₯80% logic coverage - **Activities**: β‰₯80% logic coverage - **Integration**: Critical paths with mocked activities - **Replay**: All workflow versions before deployment ## Key Testing Principles 1. **Time-Skipping** - Month-long workflows test in seconds 2. **Mock Activities** - Isolate workflow logic from external dependencies 3. **Replay Testing** - Validate determinism before deployment 4. **High Coverage** - β‰₯80% target for production workflows 5. **Fast Feedback** - Unit tests run in milliseconds ## How to Use Resources **Load specific resource when needed**: - "Show me unit testing patterns" β†’ Load `resources/unit-testing.md` - "How do I mock activities?" β†’ Load `resources/integration-testing.md` - "Setup local Temporal server" β†’ Load `resources/local-setup.md` - "Validate determinism" β†’ Load `resources/replay-testing.md` ## Additional References - Python SDK Testing: docs.temporal.io/develop/python/testing-suite - Testing Patterns: github.com/temporalio/temporal/blob/main/docs/development/testing.md - Python Samples: github.com/temporalio/samples-python
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

api-design-principles

Master REST and GraphQL API design principles to build intuitive,

coding
⭐1
# API Design Principles Master REST and GraphQL API design principles to build intuitive, scalable, and maintainable APIs that delight developers and stand the test of time. ## When to Use This Skill - Designing new REST or GraphQL APIs - Refactoring existing APIs for better usability - Establishing API design standards for your team - Reviewing API specifications before implementation - Migrating between API paradigms (REST to GraphQL, etc.) - Creating developer-friendly API documentation - Optimizing APIs for specific use cases (mobile, third-party integrations) ## Core Concepts ### 1. RESTful Design Principles **Resource-Oriented Architecture** - Resources are nouns (users, orders, products), not verbs - Use HTTP methods for actions (GET, POST, PUT, PATCH, DELETE) - URLs represent resource hierarchies - Consistent naming conventions **HTTP Methods Semantics:** - `GET`: Retrieve resources (idempotent, safe) - `POST`: Create new resources - `PUT`: Replace entire resource (idempotent) - `PATCH`: Partial resource updates - `DELETE`: Remove resources (idempotent) ### 2. GraphQL Design Principles **Schema-First Development** - Types define your domain model - Queries for reading data - Mutations for modifying data - Subscriptions for real-time updates **Query Structure:** - Clients request exactly what they need - Single endpoint, multiple operations - Strongly typed schema - Introspection built-in ### 3. API Versioning Strategies **URL Versioning:** ``` /api/v1/users /api/v2/users ``` **Header Versioning:** ``` Accept: application/vnd.api+json; version=1 ``` **Query Parameter Versioning:** ``` /api/users?version=1 ``` ## REST API Design Patterns ### Pattern 1: Resource Collection Design ```python # Good: Resource-oriented endpoints GET /api/users # List users (with pagination) POST /api/users # Create user GET /api/users/{id} # Get specific user PUT /api/users/{id} # Replace user PATCH /api/users/{id} # Update user fields DELETE /api/users/{id} # Delete user # Nested resources GET /api/users/{id}/orders # Get user's orders POST /api/users/{id}/orders # Create order for user # Bad: Action-oriented endpoints (avoid) POST /api/createUser POST /api/getUserById POST /api/deleteUser ``` ### Pattern 2: Pagination and Filtering ```python from typing import List, Optional from pydantic import BaseModel, Field class PaginationParams(BaseModel): page: int = Field(1, ge=1, description="Page number") page_size: int = Field(20, ge=1, le=100, description="Items per page") class FilterParams(BaseModel): status: Optional[str] = None created_after: Optional[str] = None search: Optional[str] = None class PaginatedResponse(BaseModel): items: List[dict] total: int page: int page_size: int pages: int @property def has_next(self) -> bool: return self.page < self.pages @property def has_prev(self) -> bool: return self.page > 1 # FastAPI endpoint example from fastapi import FastAPI, Query, Depends app = FastAPI() @app.get("/api/users", response_model=PaginatedResponse) async def list_users( page: int = Query(1, ge=1), page_size: int = Query(20, ge=1, le=100), status: Optional[str] = Query(None), search: Optional[str] = Query(None) ): # Apply filters query = build_query(status=status, search=search) # Count total total = await count_users(query) # Fetch page offset = (page - 1) * page_size users = await fetch_users(query, limit=page_size, offset=offset) return PaginatedResponse( items=users, total=total, page=page, page_size=page_size, pages=(total + page_size - 1) // page_size ) ``` ### Pattern 3: Error Handling and Status Codes ```python from fastapi import HTTPException, status from pydantic import BaseModel class ErrorResponse(BaseModel): error: str message: str details: Optional[dict] = None timestamp: str path: str class ValidationErrorDetail(BaseModel): field: str message: str value: Any # Consistent error responses STATUS_CODES = { "success": 200, "created": 201, "no_content": 204, "bad_request": 400, "unauthorized": 401, "forbidden": 403, "not_found": 404, "conflict": 409, "unprocessable": 422, "internal_error": 500 } def raise_not_found(resource: str, id: str): raise HTTPException( status_code=status.HTTP_404_NOT_FOUND, detail={ "error": "NotFound", "message": f"{resource} not found", "details": {"id": id} } ) def raise_validation_error(errors: List[ValidationErrorDetail]): raise HTTPException( status_code=status.HTTP_422_UNPROCESSABLE_ENTITY, detail={ "error": "ValidationError", "message": "Request validation failed", "details": {"errors": [e.dict() for e in errors]} } ) # Example usage @app.get("/api/users/{user_id}") async def get_user(user_id: str): user = await fetch_user(user_id) if not user: raise_not_found("User", user_id) return user ``` ### Pattern 4: HATEOAS (Hypermedia as the Engine of Application State) ```python class UserResponse(BaseModel): id: str name: str email: str _links: dict @classmethod def from_user(cls, user: User, base_url: str): return cls( id=user.id, name=user.name, email=user.email, _links={ "self": {"href": f"{base_url}/api/users/{user.id}"}, "orders": {"href": f"{base_url}/api/users/{user.id}/orders"}, "update": { "href": f"{base_url}/api/users/{user.id}", "method": "PATCH" }, "delete": { "href": f"{base_url}/api/users/{user.id}", "method": "DELETE" } } ) ``` ## GraphQL Design Patterns ### Pattern 1: Schema Design ```graphql # schema.graphql # Clear type definitions type User { id: ID! email: String! name: String! createdAt: DateTime! # Relationships orders(first: Int = 20, after: String, status: OrderStatus): OrderConnection! profile: UserProfile } type Order { id: ID! status: OrderStatus! total: Money! items: [OrderItem!]! createdAt: DateTime! # Back-reference user: User! } # Pagination pattern (Relay-style) type OrderConnection { edges: [OrderEdge!]! pageInfo: PageInfo! totalCount: Int! } type OrderEdge { node: Order! cursor: String! } type PageInfo { hasNextPage: Boolean! hasPreviousPage: Boolean! startCursor: String endCursor: String } # Enums for type safety enum OrderStatus { PENDING CONFIRMED SHIPPED DELIVERED CANCELLED } # Custom scalars scalar DateTime scalar Money # Query root type Query { user(id: ID!): User users(first: Int = 20, after: String, search: String): UserConnection! order(id: ID!): Order } # Mutation root type Mutation { createUser(input: CreateUserInput!): CreateUserPayload! updateUser(input: UpdateUserInput!): UpdateUserPayload! deleteUser(id: ID!): DeleteUserPayload! createOrder(input: CreateOrderInput!): CreateOrderPayload! } # Input types for mutations input CreateUserInput { email: String! name: String! password: String! } # Payload types for mutations type CreateUserPayload { user: User errors: [Error!] } type Error { field: String message: String! } ``` ### Pattern 2: Resolver Design ```python from typing import Optional, List from ariadne import QueryType, MutationType, ObjectType from dataclasses import dataclass query = QueryType() mutation = MutationType() user_type = ObjectType("User") @query.field("user") async def resolve_user(obj, info, id: str) -> Optional[dict]: """Resolve single user by ID.""" return await fetch_user_by_id(id) @query.field("users") async def resolve_users( obj, info, first: int = 20, after: Optional[str] = None, search: Optional[str] = None ) -> dict: """Resolve paginated user list.""" # Decode cursor offset = decode_cursor(after) if after else 0 # Fetch users users = await fetch_users( limit=first + 1, # Fetch one extra to check hasNextPage offset=offset, search=search ) # Pagination has_next = len(users) > first if has_next: users = users[:first] edges = [ { "node": user, "cursor": encode_cursor(offset + i) } for i, user in enumerate(users) ] return { "edges": edges, "pageInfo": { "hasNextPage": has_next, "hasPreviousPage": offset > 0, "startCursor": edges[0]["cursor"] if edges else None, "endCursor": edges[-1]["cursor"] if edges else None }, "totalCount": await count_users(search=search) } @user_type.field("orders") async def resolve_user_orders(user: dict, info, first: int = 20) -> dict: """Resolve user's orders (N+1 prevention with DataLoader).""" # Use DataLoader to batch requests loader = info.context["loaders"]["orders_by_user"] orders = await loader.load(user["id"]) return paginate_orders(orders, first) @mutation.field("createUser") async def resolve_create_user(obj, info, input: dict) -> dict: """Create new user.""" try: # Validate input validate_user_input(input) # Create user user = await create_user( email=input["email"], name=input["name"], password=hash_password(input["password"]) ) return { "user": user, "errors": [] } except ValidationError as e: return { "user": None, "errors": [{"field": e.field, "message": e.message}] } ``` ### Pattern 3: DataLoader (N+1 Problem Prevention) ```python from aiodataloader import DataLoader from typing import List, Optional class UserLoader(DataLoader): """Batch load users by ID.""" async def batch_load_fn(self, user_ids: List[str]) -> List[Optional[dict]]: """Load multiple users in single query.""" users = await fetch_users_by_ids(user_ids) # Map results back to input order user_map = {user["id"]: user for user in users} return [user_map.get(user_id) for user_id in user_ids] class OrdersByUserLoader(DataLoader): """Batch load orders by user ID.""" async def batch_load_fn(self, user_ids: List[str]) -> List[List[dict]]: """Load orders for multiple users in single query.""" orders = await fetch_orders_by_user_ids(user_ids) # Group orders by user_id orders_by_user = {} for order in orders: user_id = order["user_id"] if user_id not in orders_by_user: orders_by_user[user_id] = [] orders_by_user[user_id].append(order) # Return in input order return [orders_by_user.get(user_id, []) for user_id in user_ids] # Context setup def create_context(): return { "loaders": { "user": UserLoader(), "orders_by_user": OrdersByUserLoader() } } ``` ## Best Practices ### REST APIs 1. **Consistent Naming**: Use plural nouns for collections (`/users`, not `/user`) 2. **Stateless**: Each request contains all necessary information 3. **Use HTTP Status Codes Correctly**: 2xx success, 4xx client errors, 5xx server errors 4. **Version Your API**: Plan for breaking changes from day one 5. **Pagination**: Always paginate large collections 6. **Rate Limiting**: Protect your API with rate limits 7. **Documentation**: Use OpenAPI/Swagger for interactive docs ### GraphQL APIs 1. **Schema First**: Design schema before writing resolvers 2. **Avoid N+1**: Use DataLoaders for efficient data fetching 3. **Input Validation**: Validate at schema and resolver levels 4. **Error Handling**: Return structured errors in mutation payloads 5. **Pagination**: Use cursor-based pagination (Relay spec) 6. **Deprecation**: Use `@deprecated` directive for gradual migration 7. **Monitoring**: Track query complexity and execution time ## Common Pitfalls - **Over-fetching/Under-fetching (REST)**: Fixed in GraphQL but requires DataLoaders - **Breaking Changes**: Version APIs or use deprecation strategies - **Inconsistent Error Formats**: Standardize error responses - **Missing Rate Limits**: APIs without limits are vulnerable to abuse - **Poor Documentation**: Undocumented APIs frustrate developers - **Ignoring HTTP Semantics**: POST for idempotent operations breaks expectations - **Tight Coupling**: API structure shouldn't mirror database schema ## Resources - **references/rest-best-practices.md**: Comprehensive REST API design guide - **references/graphql-schema-design.md**: GraphQL schema patterns and anti-patterns - **references/api-versioning-strategies.md**: Versioning approaches and migration paths - **assets/rest-api-template.py**: FastAPI REST API template - **assets/graphql-schema-template.graphql**: Complete GraphQL schema example - **assets/api-design-checklist.md**: Pre-implementation review checklist - **scripts/openapi-generator.py**: Generate OpenAPI specs from code
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered