Skip to main content
EVOKORE// BROWSE
>

./browse/prompts

53 NODES
šŸ¤–system prompt•6 months ago

Semantic Session Checkpointing Pattern

Record lightweight semantic checkpoints at planning, risk, failure, and handoff boundaries while keeping heartbeat outside the model loop.

productivity
⭐1
# Semantic Session Checkpointing Pattern Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this pattern when session continuity matters and you need checkpoints that survive model drift or hard crashes. ## Use this when - Capturing handoff context during long sessions - Checkpointing before risky refactors - Separating liveness tracking from agent behavior ## Expected outcomes - Checkpoint timing becomes explicit and repeatable - Session heartbeat stays reliable even if the model stalls - Handoffs capture task, next action, files touched, and risk ## Source synthesis - REVOKORE/docs/MCP-Integration.md ## Dedupe notes Uses the compact REVOKORE integration guide as a distinct session-state pattern that is not already covered by EVOKORE-MCP or AGENT33 docs. ## Source excerpts ### REVOKORE/docs/MCP-Integration.md ## Recommended MCP Pattern Expose a tool that writes a short checkpoint into the active session: - current task - next action - files touched - blocker or risk The simplest implementation is to call: ```powershell REVOKORE/scripts/Write-AiCliCheckpoint.ps1 -Kind note -Message "working on auth bug" ``` From an MCP server, you can call the same script directly or append JSON lines to `REVOKORE_CHECKPOINT_PATH`.
šŸ‘0
šŸ‘ļø14
docs
šŸ“text•6 months ago

ARCH-AEP Tiered Remediation Cycle

Run a scope-locked remediation cycle that normalizes findings, revalidates them in parallel, and clears tiers with verification evidence.

architecture
⭐1
# ARCH-AEP Tiered Remediation Cycle Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this workflow when you need an orchestrated engineering review cycle with strict scope lock, tiered execution, and audit-grade evidence. ## Use this when - Large remediation efforts spanning multiple PRs - Parallel specialist review with shared backlog authority - Tracking verification evidence through closure ## Expected outcomes - Scope changes are controlled instead of creeping mid-cycle - Severity tiers drive remediation order predictably - Verification evidence is treated as part of done ## Source synthesis - CHELATEDAI/docs/ARCH AGENTIC ENGINEERING AND PLANNING/workflow.md (https://github.com/mattmre/CHELATEDAI/blob/main/docs/ARCH%20AGENTIC%20ENGINEERING%20AND%20PLANNING/workflow.md) - CHELATEDAI/docs/ARCH AGENTIC ENGINEERING AND PLANNING/orchestrator-briefing.md (https://github.com/mattmre/CHELATEDAI/blob/main/docs/ARCH%20AGENTIC%20ENGINEERING%20AND%20PLANNING/orchestrator-briefing.md) ## Dedupe notes Condenses the core ARCH-AEP workflow and briefing docs into a single remediation-cycle entry instead of importing both separately. ## Source excerpts ### CHELATEDAI/docs/ARCH AGENTIC ENGINEERING AND PLANNING/workflow.md ## Workflow (ARCH phase) 1. Scope lock - Define PR range and time window. - Freeze inputs (refinement report + framework + PR list). 2. Discovery + normalization - Orchestrator ingests `agentic-review-framework.md` and the latest refinement report. - Normalize all findings into a single backlog with unique IDs. - De-duplicate, merge overlaps, and assign provisional severity. - Record backlog in `docs/ARCH AGENTIC ENGINEERING AND PLANNING/backlog-YYYY-MM-DD.md`. 3. Parallel re-validation - Spawn specialist agents to re-validate findings against current main. - Each agent must attach exact file paths and line ranges. - Propose the smallest safe fix, acceptance criteria, and effort sizing (S/M/L). 4. Architecture and planning synthesis - Orchestrator merges validated findings into a master backlog. - Re-score and re-rank using the sorting model. - Identify dependency chains and blockers. ### CHELATEDAI/docs/ARCH AGENTIC ENGINEERING AND PLANNING/orchestrator-briefing.md Purpose: Quick reference for the ARCH-AEP documentation set, plus the narrative to start a new session. Full file index: `docs/INDEX.md` ## What Exists In This Folder - `README.md`: narrative overview and intent for ARCH-AEP. - `workflow.md`: end-to-end workflow specification with phases, guardrails, and enhancements. - `templates.md`: ID and branch conventions, tracker table format, and status log. - `backlog-template.md`: template for the master backlog file. - `backlog-index.md`: index of backlog files. - `next-session.md`: short handoff checklist for resuming work. - `phase-planning.md`: long-running planning record for the current cycle. - `schedule-and-tracking.md`: cadence, gates, and milestone tracking. - `agent-learning.md`: cross-session learnings and reusable patterns. - `change-log.md`: scope/defer decisions with audit context. - `risk-memo-template.md`: Critical/High risk memo template. - `risk-memos/README.md`: storage location for risk memos. - `phase-summary-template.md`: template for per-PR or per-phase summaries. - `phase-summaries/README.md`: storage location for phase summaries. - `verification-log.md`: test/build evidence mirror for PRs. - `tracker-pointer.md`: pointer to the active tracker file. - `tracker-index.md`: index of tracker files. - `scope-lock-t ...
šŸ‘0
šŸ‘ļø0
docs
šŸ“text•6 months ago

Docker-Backed Jupyter Kernel Operator

Operate containerized Jupyter kernels with enablement, smoke checks, cleanup, and failure handling baked into the runbook.

devops
⭐1
# Docker-Backed Jupyter Kernel Operator Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this runbook when you need isolated notebook execution, clear container lifecycle management, and troubleshooting guidance. ## Use this when - Enabling containerized notebook workflows - Cleaning up kernel containers safely - Troubleshooting notebook execution environments ## Expected outcomes - Kernel startup and cleanup steps are documented end-to-end - Failure modes are easier to diagnose - Notebook execution can be repeated without manual guesswork ## Source synthesis - AGENT33/docs/runbooks/jupyter-kernel-containers.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/runbooks/jupyter-kernel-containers.md) ## Dedupe notes Uses the AGENT33 Jupyter container runbook as a focused operations import without duplicating broader walkthroughs. ## Source excerpts ### AGENT33/docs/runbooks/jupyter-kernel-containers.md ## Purpose Operate the Docker-backed Jupyter kernel adapter introduced for Phase 38 Stage 3 / Phase 42 follow-on work. ## Enablement Set: - `JUPYTER_KERNEL_ENABLED=true` - `JUPYTER_KERNEL_MODE=docker` Optional settings: - `JUPYTER_KERNEL_DOCKER_IMAGE` - `JUPYTER_KERNEL_ALLOWED_IMAGES` - `JUPYTER_KERNEL_NETWORK_ENABLED` - `JUPYTER_KERNEL_MOUNT_WORKDIR` - `JUPYTER_KERNEL_CONTAINER_WORKDIR` ## Operational Notes - Docker mode publishes kernel ports to the host and mounts a per-session runtime directory containing the Jupyter connection file. - When `JUPYTER_KERNEL_NETWORK_ENABLED=false`, the adapter starts containers with `--network none`. - Working-directory mounting is opt-in and should only point at paths already approved by workflow / execution policy. - The adapter enforces an image allowlist when one is configured. ## Failure Modes - `jupyter_client not installed`: install with `pip install agent33[jupyter]` - `docker executable not found`: install Docker and ensure `docker` is on `PATH` - `Docker image ... is not permitted`: align the requested image with `JUPYTER_KERNEL_ALLOWED_IMAGES` - kernel startup timeout: inspect Docker logs for the session container and verify the image includes `ipykernel` ## Cleanup - One-shot sessions are removed after execution. - Stateful sessions are removed explicitly or via adapter shutdown. - Forced cleanup uses `docker rm -f <container>` and deletes the runtime connection directory. ## Quick Smoke Workflow Register a minimal workflow that exercises the Docker-backed `code-interpreter` tool: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/workflows/ \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{ "name": "docker-kernel-smoke", "version": "1.0.0", "description": "Validate Docker-backed Jupyter execution", "triggers": {"manual": true}, "inputs": {}, "outputs": { "result": {"type": "object"} }, "steps": [ { "id": "run-notebook-code", "action": "execute-code", "inputs": { "tool_id": "code-interpreter", "language": "python", "code": "print(6 * 7)" } } ], "execution": {"mode": "sequential"} }' ``` Then execute it: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/workflows/docker-kernel-smoke/execute \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"inputs": {}}' ```
šŸ‘0
šŸ‘ļø0
docs
šŸ“text•6 months ago

Improvement Cycle Review Wizard

Run a live improvement-cycle workflow that links review artifacts, approvals, tool requests, and operator checkpoints.

productivity
⭐1
# Improvement Cycle Review Wizard Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this workflow when an operator needs a guided improvement cycle with live status, explicit approvals, and linked artifacts. ## Use this when - Operational review sessions with live progress - Approval-heavy improvement cycles - Coordinating review artifacts with execution steps ## Expected outcomes - Live workflow execution remains visible to operators - Artifacts, approvals, and tool requests stay connected - Improvement loops become easier to audit and rerun ## Source synthesis - AGENT33/docs/phase25-26-live-review-walkthrough.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/phase25-26-live-review-walkthrough.md) - AGENT33/docs/operator-improvement-cycle-and-jupyter.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/operator-improvement-cycle-and-jupyter.md) ## Dedupe notes Merges AGENT33 live review walkthrough details with the shorter operator-focused improvement-cycle guide. ## Source excerpts ### AGENT33/docs/phase25-26-live-review-walkthrough.md This guide documents the operator flow introduced by the Phase 25 live workflow transport and the Phase 26/27 improvement-cycle review wizard stack. ## Scope - Live workflow execution with run-scoped graph refresh - WebSocket-first status streaming with authenticated SSE fallback - Improvement-cycle preset creation - Explanation artifact generation for `plan_review` and `diff_review` - Linked review creation, risk assessment, L1/L2 signoff, and final approval - Pending tool-approval triage inside the same workflow domain > Note > This walkthrough reflects the review stack built on `codex/session58-phase26-wizard` and validated in `codex/session60-phase22-docs-validation`. If the related PRs are still open, `main` may not yet expose every surface described here. ## Operator Flow ```mermaid sequenceDiagram participant UI as "Frontend Control Plane" participant WF as "Workflow APIs" participant VIZ as "Visualization APIs" participant EXP as "Explanation APIs" participant REV as "Review APIs" participant HITL as "Tool Approval APIs" UI->>WF: "POST /v1/workflows/{name}/execute (single mode, caller run_id)" UI->>VIZ: "GET /v1/visualizations/workflows/{workflow_id}/graph?run_id=..." UI->>WF: "WS /v1/workflows/{run_id}/ws" alt "WebSocket unav ... ### AGENT33/docs/operator-improvement-cycle-and-jupyter.md This guide covers the merged operator surfaces for: - the Phase 26 improvement-cycle review wizard - the Phase 27 canonical workflow presets - the Phase 38 Docker-backed Jupyter kernel workflow Use it when you want the shortest current path from UI entry point to a real workflow run. ## 1. Improvement-Cycle Wizard The wizard is mounted inside the frontend control plane under the `Workflows` domain. ### Entry path 1. Open the frontend at `http://localhost:3000` 2. Authenticate with a bearer token or API key 3. Open `Advanced Settings` 4. Select the `Workflows` domain 5. Use the `Improvement Cycle Wizard` panel at the top of the page ### What the wizard does The wizard stitches together the backend surfaces that previously had to be called manually: - plan review / diff review generation - review creation and risk assessment - L1 and L2 review submission - tool approval request review and decision capture Reference implementation: - frontend: `frontend/src/features/improvement-cycle/ImprovementCycleWizard.tsx` - tests: `frontend/src/features/improvement-cycle/ImprovementCycleWizard.test.tsx` For the detailed review flow, keep using: - [`phase25-26-live-review-walkthrough.md`](phase25-26-live-review-walkthrough.md) ## 2. Canonical Workflow Presets The `Workflows` doma ...
šŸ‘0
šŸ‘ļø0
docs
šŸ“text•6 months ago

Guardrailed Code Review Pipeline

Run a staged code review workflow with explicit risk assessment, reviewer handoffs, and merge gates.

coding
⭐1
# Guardrailed Code Review Pipeline Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this workflow when a change needs structured review evidence, clear approval stages, and a rollback-aware path to merge. ## Use this when - Multi-step L1 and L2 review signoff - High-risk changes that need audit trails - Standardizing reviewer decisions before merge ## Expected outcomes - Review states and approval checkpoints stay explicit - Risk assessment and evidence are captured before merge - The workflow remains small enough to reuse across repositories ## Source synthesis - AGENT33/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md) - AGENT33/docs/walkthroughs.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/walkthroughs.md) ## Dedupe notes Combines AGENT33 lifecycle mapping and operator walkthrough material into one review-oriented site entry. ## Source excerpts ### AGENT33/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md ### 4.1 Review Lifecycle States: - `draft -> ready -> l1-review -> l1-approved -> (optional l2-review -> l2-approved) -> approved -> merged` Main APIs: - `/v1/reviews/{id}/assess` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/assign-l1` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/l1` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/assign-l2` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/l2` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/approve` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/merge` ### AGENT33/docs/walkthroughs.md ## 4. Review Lifecycle (Two-Layer Signoff) Create review: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/ \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"task_id":"TASK-101","branch":"feat/docs-refresh","pr_number":12}' ``` Assess risk: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/assess \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"triggers":["api-public","security"]}' ``` Move to ready and assign L1: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/ready -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/assign-l1 -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" ``` Submit L1 decision: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/l1 \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"decision":"approved","issues":[],"comments":"L1 pass"}' ``` If L2 required, continue: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/assign-l2 -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/l2 \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"decision":"approved","issues":[],"commen ...
šŸ‘0
šŸ‘ļø0
docs
šŸ¤–system prompt•7 months ago

secrets-management

Implement secure secrets management for CI/CD pipelines using

coding
⭐1
# Secrets Management Secure secrets management practices for CI/CD pipelines using Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, and other tools. ## Purpose Implement secure secrets management in CI/CD pipelines without hardcoding sensitive information. ## When to Use - Store API keys and credentials - Manage database passwords - Handle TLS certificates - Rotate secrets automatically - Implement least-privilege access ## Secrets Management Tools ### HashiCorp Vault - Centralized secrets management - Dynamic secrets generation - Secret rotation - Audit logging - Fine-grained access control ### AWS Secrets Manager - AWS-native solution - Automatic rotation - Integration with RDS - CloudFormation support ### Azure Key Vault - Azure-native solution - HSM-backed keys - Certificate management - RBAC integration ### Google Secret Manager - GCP-native solution - Versioning - IAM integration ## HashiCorp Vault Integration ### Setup Vault ```bash # Start Vault dev server vault server -dev # Set environment export VAULT_ADDR='http://127.0.0.1:8200' export VAULT_TOKEN='root' # Enable secrets engine vault secrets enable -path=secret kv-v2 # Store secret vault kv put secret/database/config username=admin password=secret ``` ### GitHub Actions with Vault ```yaml name: Deploy with Vault Secrets on: [push] jobs: deploy: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - name: Import Secrets from Vault uses: hashicorp/vault-action@v2 with: url: https://vault.example.com:8200 token: ${{ secrets.VAULT_TOKEN }} secrets: | secret/data/database username | DB_USERNAME ; secret/data/database password | DB_PASSWORD ; secret/data/api key | API_KEY - name: Use secrets run: | echo "Connecting to database as $DB_USERNAME" # Use $DB_PASSWORD, $API_KEY ``` ### GitLab CI with Vault ```yaml deploy: image: vault:latest before_script: - export VAULT_ADDR=https://vault.example.com:8200 - export VAULT_TOKEN=$VAULT_TOKEN - apk add curl jq script: - | DB_PASSWORD=$(vault kv get -field=password secret/database/config) API_KEY=$(vault kv get -field=key secret/api/credentials) echo "Deploying with secrets..." # Use $DB_PASSWORD, $API_KEY ``` **Reference:** See `references/vault-setup.md` ## AWS Secrets Manager ### Store Secret ```bash aws secretsmanager create-secret \ --name production/database/password \ --secret-string "super-secret-password" ``` ### Retrieve in GitHub Actions ```yaml - name: Configure AWS credentials uses: aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials@v4 with: aws-access-key-id: ${{ secrets.AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID }} aws-secret-access-key: ${{ secrets.AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY }} aws-region: us-west-2 - name: Get secret from AWS run: | SECRET=$(aws secretsmanager get-secret-value \ --secret-id production/database/password \ --query SecretString \ --output text) echo "::add-mask::$SECRET" echo "DB_PASSWORD=$SECRET" >> $GITHUB_ENV - name: Use secret run: | # Use $DB_PASSWORD ./deploy.sh ``` ### Terraform with AWS Secrets Manager ```hcl data "aws_secretsmanager_secret_version" "db_password" { secret_id = "production/database/password" } resource "aws_db_instance" "main" { allocated_storage = 100 engine = "postgres" instance_class = "db.t3.large" username = "admin" password = jsondecode(data.aws_secretsmanager_secret_version.db_password.secret_string)["password"] } ``` ## GitHub Secrets ### Organization/Repository Secrets ```yaml - name: Use GitHub secret run: | echo "API Key: ${{ secrets.API_KEY }}" echo "Database URL: ${{ secrets.DATABASE_URL }}" ``` ### Environment Secrets ```yaml deploy: runs-on: ubuntu-latest environment: production steps: - name: Deploy run: | echo "Deploying with ${{ secrets.PROD_API_KEY }}" ``` **Reference:** See `references/github-secrets.md` ## GitLab CI/CD Variables ### Project Variables ```yaml deploy: script: - echo "Deploying with $API_KEY" - echo "Database: $DATABASE_URL" ``` ### Protected and Masked Variables - Protected: Only available in protected branches - Masked: Hidden in job logs - File type: Stored as file ## Best Practices 1. **Never commit secrets** to Git 2. **Use different secrets** per environment 3. **Rotate secrets regularly** 4. **Implement least-privilege access** 5. **Enable audit logging** 6. **Use secret scanning** (GitGuardian, TruffleHog) 7. **Mask secrets in logs** 8. **Encrypt secrets at rest** 9. **Use short-lived tokens** when possible 10. **Document secret requirements** ## Secret Rotation ### Automated Rotation with AWS ```python import boto3 import json def lambda_handler(event, context): client = boto3.client('secretsmanager') # Get current secret response = client.get_secret_value(SecretId='my-secret') current_secret = json.loads(response['SecretString']) # Generate new password new_password = generate_strong_password() # Update database password update_database_password(new_password) # Update secret client.put_secret_value( SecretId='my-secret', SecretString=json.dumps({ 'username': current_secret['username'], 'password': new_password }) ) return {'statusCode': 200} ``` ### Manual Rotation Process 1. Generate new secret 2. Update secret in secret store 3. Update applications to use new secret 4. Verify functionality 5. Revoke old secret ## External Secrets Operator ### Kubernetes Integration ```yaml apiVersion: external-secrets.io/v1beta1 kind: SecretStore metadata: name: vault-backend namespace: production spec: provider: vault: server: "https://vault.example.com:8200" path: "secret" version: "v2" auth: kubernetes: mountPath: "kubernetes" role: "production" --- apiVersion: external-secrets.io/v1beta1 kind: ExternalSecret metadata: name: database-credentials namespace: production spec: refreshInterval: 1h secretStoreRef: name: vault-backend kind: SecretStore target: name: database-credentials creationPolicy: Owner data: - secretKey: username remoteRef: key: database/config property: username - secretKey: password remoteRef: key: database/config property: password ``` ## Secret Scanning ### Pre-commit Hook ```bash #!/bin/bash # .git/hooks/pre-commit # Check for secrets with TruffleHog docker run --rm -v "$(pwd):/repo" \ trufflesecurity/trufflehog:latest \ filesystem --directory=/repo if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then echo "āŒ Secret detected! Commit blocked." exit 1 fi ``` ### CI/CD Secret Scanning ```yaml secret-scan: stage: security image: trufflesecurity/trufflehog:latest script: - trufflehog filesystem . allow_failure: false ``` ## Reference Files - `references/vault-setup.md` - HashiCorp Vault configuration - `references/github-secrets.md` - GitHub Secrets best practices ## Related Skills - `github-actions-templates` - For GitHub Actions integration - `gitlab-ci-patterns` - For GitLab CI integration - `deployment-pipeline-design` - For pipeline architecture
šŸ‘0
šŸ‘ļø0
šŸ¤– Auto-discovered
šŸ¤–system prompt•7 months ago

solidity-security

Master smart contract security best practices to prevent common

security
⭐1
# Solidity Security Master smart contract security best practices, vulnerability prevention, and secure Solidity development patterns. ## When to Use This Skill - Writing secure smart contracts - Auditing existing contracts for vulnerabilities - Implementing secure DeFi protocols - Preventing reentrancy, overflow, and access control issues - Optimizing gas usage while maintaining security - Preparing contracts for professional audits - Understanding common attack vectors ## Critical Vulnerabilities ### 1. Reentrancy Attacker calls back into your contract before state is updated. **Vulnerable Code:** ```solidity // VULNERABLE TO REENTRANCY contract VulnerableBank { mapping(address => uint256) public balances; function withdraw() public { uint256 amount = balances[msg.sender]; // DANGER: External call before state update (bool success, ) = msg.sender.call{value: amount}(""); require(success); balances[msg.sender] = 0; // Too late! } } ``` **Secure Pattern (Checks-Effects-Interactions):** ```solidity contract SecureBank { mapping(address => uint256) public balances; function withdraw() public { uint256 amount = balances[msg.sender]; require(amount > 0, "Insufficient balance"); // EFFECTS: Update state BEFORE external call balances[msg.sender] = 0; // INTERACTIONS: External call last (bool success, ) = msg.sender.call{value: amount}(""); require(success, "Transfer failed"); } } ``` **Alternative: ReentrancyGuard** ```solidity import "@openzeppelin/contracts/security/ReentrancyGuard.sol"; contract SecureBank is ReentrancyGuard { mapping(address => uint256) public balances; function withdraw() public nonReentrant { uint256 amount = balances[msg.sender]; require(amount > 0, "Insufficient balance"); balances[msg.sender] = 0; (bool success, ) = msg.sender.call{value: amount}(""); require(success, "Transfer failed"); } } ``` ### 2. Integer Overflow/Underflow **Vulnerable Code (Solidity < 0.8.0):** ```solidity // VULNERABLE contract VulnerableToken { mapping(address => uint256) public balances; function transfer(address to, uint256 amount) public { // No overflow check - can wrap around balances[msg.sender] -= amount; // Can underflow! balances[to] += amount; // Can overflow! } } ``` **Secure Pattern (Solidity >= 0.8.0):** ```solidity // Solidity 0.8+ has built-in overflow/underflow checks contract SecureToken { mapping(address => uint256) public balances; function transfer(address to, uint256 amount) public { // Automatically reverts on overflow/underflow balances[msg.sender] -= amount; balances[to] += amount; } } ``` **For Solidity < 0.8.0, use SafeMath:** ```solidity import "@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/math/SafeMath.sol"; contract SecureToken { using SafeMath for uint256; mapping(address => uint256) public balances; function transfer(address to, uint256 amount) public { balances[msg.sender] = balances[msg.sender].sub(amount); balances[to] = balances[to].add(amount); } } ``` ### 3. Access Control **Vulnerable Code:** ```solidity // VULNERABLE: Anyone can call critical functions contract VulnerableContract { address public owner; function withdraw(uint256 amount) public { // No access control! payable(msg.sender).transfer(amount); } } ``` **Secure Pattern:** ```solidity import "@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol"; contract SecureContract is Ownable { function withdraw(uint256 amount) public onlyOwner { payable(owner()).transfer(amount); } } // Or implement custom role-based access contract RoleBasedContract { mapping(address => bool) public admins; modifier onlyAdmin() { require(admins[msg.sender], "Not an admin"); _; } function criticalFunction() public onlyAdmin { // Protected function } } ``` ### 4. Front-Running **Vulnerable:** ```solidity // VULNERABLE TO FRONT-RUNNING contract VulnerableDEX { function swap(uint256 amount, uint256 minOutput) public { // Attacker sees this in mempool and front-runs uint256 output = calculateOutput(amount); require(output >= minOutput, "Slippage too high"); // Perform swap } } ``` **Mitigation:** ```solidity contract SecureDEX { mapping(bytes32 => bool) public usedCommitments; // Step 1: Commit to trade function commitTrade(bytes32 commitment) public { usedCommitments[commitment] = true; } // Step 2: Reveal trade (next block) function revealTrade( uint256 amount, uint256 minOutput, bytes32 secret ) public { bytes32 commitment = keccak256(abi.encodePacked( msg.sender, amount, minOutput, secret )); require(usedCommitments[commitment], "Invalid commitment"); // Perform swap } } ``` ## Security Best Practices ### Checks-Effects-Interactions Pattern ```solidity contract SecurePattern { mapping(address => uint256) public balances; function withdraw(uint256 amount) public { // 1. CHECKS: Validate conditions require(amount <= balances[msg.sender], "Insufficient balance"); require(amount > 0, "Amount must be positive"); // 2. EFFECTS: Update state balances[msg.sender] -= amount; // 3. INTERACTIONS: External calls last (bool success, ) = msg.sender.call{value: amount}(""); require(success, "Transfer failed"); } } ``` ### Pull Over Push Pattern ```solidity // Prefer this (pull) contract SecurePayment { mapping(address => uint256) public pendingWithdrawals; function recordPayment(address recipient, uint256 amount) internal { pendingWithdrawals[recipient] += amount; } function withdraw() public { uint256 amount = pendingWithdrawals[msg.sender]; require(amount > 0, "Nothing to withdraw"); pendingWithdrawals[msg.sender] = 0; payable(msg.sender).transfer(amount); } } // Over this (push) contract RiskyPayment { function distributePayments(address[] memory recipients, uint256[] memory amounts) public { for (uint i = 0; i < recipients.length; i++) { // If any transfer fails, entire batch fails payable(recipients[i]).transfer(amounts[i]); } } } ``` ### Input Validation ```solidity contract SecureContract { function transfer(address to, uint256 amount) public { // Validate inputs require(to != address(0), "Invalid recipient"); require(to != address(this), "Cannot send to contract"); require(amount > 0, "Amount must be positive"); require(amount <= balances[msg.sender], "Insufficient balance"); // Proceed with transfer balances[msg.sender] -= amount; balances[to] += amount; } } ``` ### Emergency Stop (Circuit Breaker) ```solidity import "@openzeppelin/contracts/security/Pausable.sol"; contract EmergencyStop is Pausable, Ownable { function criticalFunction() public whenNotPaused { // Function logic } function emergencyStop() public onlyOwner { _pause(); } function resume() public onlyOwner { _unpause(); } } ``` ## Gas Optimization ### Use `uint256` Instead of Smaller Types ```solidity // More gas efficient contract GasEfficient { uint256 public value; // Optimal function set(uint256 _value) public { value = _value; } } // Less efficient contract GasInefficient { uint8 public value; // Still uses 256-bit slot function set(uint8 _value) public { value = _value; // Extra gas for type conversion } } ``` ### Pack Storage Variables ```solidity // Gas efficient (3 variables in 1 slot) contract PackedStorage { uint128 public a; // Slot 0 uint64 public b; // Slot 0 uint64 public c; // Slot 0 uint256 public d; // Slot 1 } // Gas inefficient (each variable in separate slot) contract UnpackedStorage { uint256 public a; // Slot 0 uint256 public b; // Slot 1 uint256 public c; // Slot 2 uint256 public d; // Slot 3 } ``` ### Use `calldata` Instead of `memory` for Function Arguments ```solidity contract GasOptimized { // More gas efficient function processData(uint256[] calldata data) public pure returns (uint256) { return data[0]; } // Less efficient function processDataMemory(uint256[] memory data) public pure returns (uint256) { return data[0]; } } ``` ### Use Events for Data Storage (When Appropriate) ```solidity contract EventStorage { // Emitting events is cheaper than storage event DataStored(address indexed user, uint256 indexed id, bytes data); function storeData(uint256 id, bytes calldata data) public { emit DataStored(msg.sender, id, data); // Don't store in contract storage unless needed } } ``` ## Common Vulnerabilities Checklist ```solidity // Security Checklist Contract contract SecurityChecklist { /** * [ ] Reentrancy protection (ReentrancyGuard or CEI pattern) * [ ] Integer overflow/underflow (Solidity 0.8+ or SafeMath) * [ ] Access control (Ownable, roles, modifiers) * [ ] Input validation (require statements) * [ ] Front-running mitigation (commit-reveal if applicable) * [ ] Gas optimization (packed storage, calldata) * [ ] Emergency stop mechanism (Pausable) * [ ] Pull over push pattern for payments * [ ] No delegatecall to untrusted contracts * [ ] No tx.origin for authentication (use msg.sender) * [ ] Proper event emission * [ ] External calls at end of function * [ ] Check return values of external calls * [ ] No hardcoded addresses * [ ] Upgrade mechanism (if proxy pattern) */ } ``` ## Testing for Security ```javascript // Hardhat test example const { expect } = require("chai"); const { ethers } = require("hardhat"); describe("Security Tests", function () { it("Should prevent reentrancy attack", async function () { const [attacker] = await ethers.getSigners(); const VictimBank = await ethers.getContractFactory("SecureBank"); const bank = await VictimBank.deploy(); const Attacker = await ethers.getContractFactory("ReentrancyAttacker"); const attackerContract = await Attacker.deploy(bank.address); // Deposit funds await bank.deposit({ value: ethers.utils.parseEther("10") }); // Attempt reentrancy attack await expect( attackerContract.attack({ value: ethers.utils.parseEther("1") }), ).to.be.revertedWith("ReentrancyGuard: reentrant call"); }); it("Should prevent integer overflow", async function () { const Token = await ethers.getContractFactory("SecureToken"); const token = await Token.deploy(); // Attempt overflow await expect(token.transfer(attacker.address, ethers.constants.MaxUint256)) .to.be.reverted; }); it("Should enforce access control", async function () { const [owner, attacker] = await ethers.getSigners(); const Contract = await ethers.getContractFactory("SecureContract"); const contract = await Contract.deploy(); // Attempt unauthorized withdrawal await expect(contract.connect(attacker).withdraw(100)).to.be.revertedWith( "Ownable: caller is not the owner", ); }); }); ``` ## Audit Preparation ```solidity contract WellDocumentedContract { /** * @title Well Documented Contract * @dev Example of proper documentation for audits * @notice This contract handles user deposits and withdrawals */ /// @notice Mapping of user balances mapping(address => uint256) public balances; /** * @dev Deposits ETH into the contract * @notice Anyone can deposit funds */ function deposit() public payable { require(msg.value > 0, "Must send ETH"); balances[msg.sender] += msg.value; } /** * @dev Withdraws user's balance * @notice Follows CEI pattern to prevent reentrancy * @param amount Amount to withdraw in wei */ function withdraw(uint256 amount) public { // CHECKS require(amount <= balances[msg.sender], "Insufficient balance"); // EFFECTS balances[msg.sender] -= amount; // INTERACTIONS (bool success, ) = msg.sender.call{value: amount}(""); require(success, "Transfer failed"); } } ``` ## Resources - **references/reentrancy.md**: Comprehensive reentrancy prevention - **references/access-control.md**: Role-based access patterns - **references/overflow-underflow.md**: SafeMath and integer safety - **references/gas-optimization.md**: Gas saving techniques - **references/vulnerability-patterns.md**: Common vulnerability catalog - **assets/solidity-contracts-templates.sol**: Secure contract templates - **assets/security-checklist.md**: Pre-audit checklist - **scripts/analyze-contract.sh**: Static analysis tools ## Tools for Security Analysis - **Slither**: Static analysis tool - **Mythril**: Security analysis tool - **Echidna**: Fuzzing tool - **Manticore**: Symbolic execution - **Securify**: Automated security scanner ## Common Pitfalls 1. **Using `tx.origin` for Authentication**: Use `msg.sender` instead 2. **Unchecked External Calls**: Always check return values 3. **Delegatecall to Untrusted Contracts**: Can hijack your contract 4. **Floating Pragma**: Pin to specific Solidity version 5. **Missing Events**: Emit events for state changes 6. **Excessive Gas in Loops**: Can hit block gas limit 7. **No Upgrade Path**: Consider proxy patterns if upgrades needed
šŸ‘0
šŸ‘ļø0
šŸ¤– Auto-discovered
šŸ¤–system prompt•7 months ago

team-composition-patterns

Design optimal agent team compositions with sizing heuristics,

coding
⭐1
# Team Composition Patterns Best practices for composing multi-agent teams, selecting team sizes, choosing agent types, and configuring display modes for Claude Code's Agent Teams feature. ## When to Use This Skill - Deciding how many teammates to spawn for a task - Choosing between preset team configurations - Selecting the right agent type (subagent_type) for each role - Configuring teammate display modes (tmux, iTerm2, in-process) - Building custom team compositions for non-standard workflows ## Team Sizing Heuristics | Complexity | Team Size | When to Use | | ------------ | --------- | ----------------------------------------------------------- | | Simple | 1-2 | Single-dimension review, isolated bug, small feature | | Moderate | 2-3 | Multi-file changes, 2-3 concerns, medium features | | Complex | 3-4 | Cross-cutting concerns, large features, deep debugging | | Very Complex | 4-5 | Full-stack features, comprehensive reviews, systemic issues | **Rule of thumb**: Start with the smallest team that covers all required dimensions. Adding teammates increases coordination overhead. ## Preset Team Compositions ### Review Team - **Size**: 3 reviewers - **Agents**: 3x `team-reviewer` - **Default dimensions**: security, performance, architecture - **Use when**: Code changes need multi-dimensional quality assessment ### Debug Team - **Size**: 3 investigators - **Agents**: 3x `team-debugger` - **Default hypotheses**: 3 competing hypotheses - **Use when**: Bug has multiple plausible root causes ### Feature Team - **Size**: 3 (1 lead + 2 implementers) - **Agents**: 1x `team-lead` + 2x `team-implementer` - **Use when**: Feature can be decomposed into parallel work streams ### Fullstack Team - **Size**: 4 (1 lead + 3 implementers) - **Agents**: 1x `team-lead` + 1x frontend `team-implementer` + 1x backend `team-implementer` + 1x test `team-implementer` - **Use when**: Feature spans frontend, backend, and test layers ### Research Team - **Size**: 3 researchers - **Agents**: 3x `general-purpose` - **Default areas**: Each assigned a different research question, module, or topic - **Capabilities**: Codebase search (Grep, Glob, Read), web search (WebSearch, WebFetch) - **Use when**: Need to understand a codebase, research libraries, compare approaches, or gather information from code and web sources in parallel ### Security Team - **Size**: 4 reviewers - **Agents**: 4x `team-reviewer` - **Default dimensions**: OWASP/vulnerabilities, auth/access control, dependencies/supply chain, secrets/configuration - **Use when**: Comprehensive security audit covering multiple attack surfaces ### Migration Team - **Size**: 4 (1 lead + 2 implementers + 1 reviewer) - **Agents**: 1x `team-lead` + 2x `team-implementer` + 1x `team-reviewer` - **Use when**: Large codebase migration (framework upgrade, language port, API version bump) requiring parallel work with correctness verification ## Agent Type Selection When spawning teammates with the Task tool, choose `subagent_type` based on what tools the teammate needs: | Agent Type | Tools Available | Use For | | ------------------------------ | ----------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- | | `general-purpose` | All tools (Read, Write, Edit, Bash, etc.) | Implementation, debugging, any task requiring file changes | | `Explore` | Read-only tools (Read, Grep, Glob) | Research, code exploration, analysis | | `Plan` | Read-only tools | Architecture planning, task decomposition | | `agent-teams:team-reviewer` | All tools | Code review with structured findings | | `agent-teams:team-debugger` | All tools | Hypothesis-driven investigation | | `agent-teams:team-implementer` | All tools | Building features within file ownership boundaries | | `agent-teams:team-lead` | All tools | Team orchestration and coordination | **Key distinction**: Read-only agents (Explore, Plan) cannot modify files. Never assign implementation tasks to read-only agents. ## Display Mode Configuration Configure in `~/.claude/settings.json`: ```json { "teammateMode": "tmux" } ``` | Mode | Behavior | Best For | | -------------- | ------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------- | | `"tmux"` | Each teammate in a tmux pane | Development workflows, monitoring multiple agents | | `"iterm2"` | Each teammate in an iTerm2 tab | macOS users who prefer iTerm2 | | `"in-process"` | All teammates in same process | Simple tasks, CI/CD environments | ## Custom Team Guidelines When building custom teams: 1. **Every team needs a coordinator** — Either designate a `team-lead` or have the user coordinate directly 2. **Match roles to agent types** — Use specialized agents (reviewer, debugger, implementer) when available 3. **Avoid duplicate roles** — Two agents doing the same thing wastes resources 4. **Define boundaries upfront** — Each teammate needs clear ownership of files or responsibilities 5. **Keep it small** — 2-4 teammates is the sweet spot; 5+ requires significant coordination overhead
šŸ‘0
šŸ‘ļø0
šŸ¤– Auto-discovered
šŸ¤–system prompt•7 months ago

service-mesh-observability

Implement comprehensive observability for service meshes including

architecture
⭐1
# Service Mesh Observability Complete guide to observability patterns for Istio, Linkerd, and service mesh deployments. ## When to Use This Skill - Setting up distributed tracing across services - Implementing service mesh metrics and dashboards - Debugging latency and error issues - Defining SLOs for service communication - Visualizing service dependencies - Troubleshooting mesh connectivity ## Core Concepts ### 1. Three Pillars of Observability ``` ā”Œā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā” │ Observability │ ā”œā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”¬ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”¬ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”¤ │ Metrics │ Traces │ Logs │ │ │ │ │ │ • Request rate │ • Span context │ • Access logs │ │ • Error rate │ • Latency │ • Error details │ │ • Latency P50 │ • Dependencies │ • Debug info │ │ • Saturation │ • Bottlenecks │ • Audit trail │ ā””ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”“ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”“ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”˜ ``` ### 2. Golden Signals for Mesh | Signal | Description | Alert Threshold | | -------------- | ------------------------- | ----------------- | | **Latency** | Request duration P50, P99 | P99 > 500ms | | **Traffic** | Requests per second | Anomaly detection | | **Errors** | 5xx error rate | > 1% | | **Saturation** | Resource utilization | > 80% | ## Templates ### Template 1: Istio with Prometheus & Grafana ```yaml # Install Prometheus apiVersion: v1 kind: ConfigMap metadata: name: prometheus namespace: istio-system data: prometheus.yml: | global: scrape_interval: 15s scrape_configs: - job_name: 'istio-mesh' kubernetes_sd_configs: - role: endpoints namespaces: names: - istio-system relabel_configs: - source_labels: [__meta_kubernetes_service_name] action: keep regex: istio-telemetry --- # ServiceMonitor for Prometheus Operator apiVersion: monitoring.coreos.com/v1 kind: ServiceMonitor metadata: name: istio-mesh namespace: istio-system spec: selector: matchLabels: app: istiod endpoints: - port: http-monitoring interval: 15s ``` ### Template 2: Key Istio Metrics Queries ```promql # Request rate by service sum(rate(istio_requests_total{reporter="destination"}[5m])) by (destination_service_name) # Error rate (5xx) sum(rate(istio_requests_total{reporter="destination", response_code=~"5.."}[5m])) / sum(rate(istio_requests_total{reporter="destination"}[5m])) * 100 # P99 latency histogram_quantile(0.99, sum(rate(istio_request_duration_milliseconds_bucket{reporter="destination"}[5m])) by (le, destination_service_name)) # TCP connections sum(istio_tcp_connections_opened_total{reporter="destination"}) by (destination_service_name) # Request size histogram_quantile(0.99, sum(rate(istio_request_bytes_bucket{reporter="destination"}[5m])) by (le, destination_service_name)) ``` ### Template 3: Jaeger Distributed Tracing ```yaml # Jaeger installation for Istio apiVersion: install.istio.io/v1alpha1 kind: IstioOperator spec: meshConfig: enableTracing: true defaultConfig: tracing: sampling: 100.0 # 100% in dev, lower in prod zipkin: address: jaeger-collector.istio-system:9411 --- # Jaeger deployment apiVersion: apps/v1 kind: Deployment metadata: name: jaeger namespace: istio-system spec: selector: matchLabels: app: jaeger template: metadata: labels: app: jaeger spec: containers: - name: jaeger image: jaegertracing/all-in-one:1.50 ports: - containerPort: 5775 # UDP - containerPort: 6831 # Thrift - containerPort: 6832 # Thrift - containerPort: 5778 # Config - containerPort: 16686 # UI - containerPort: 14268 # HTTP - containerPort: 14250 # gRPC - containerPort: 9411 # Zipkin env: - name: COLLECTOR_ZIPKIN_HOST_PORT value: ":9411" ``` ### Template 4: Linkerd Viz Dashboard ```bash # Install Linkerd viz extension linkerd viz install | kubectl apply -f - # Access dashboard linkerd viz dashboard # CLI commands for observability # Top requests linkerd viz top deploy/my-app # Per-route metrics linkerd viz routes deploy/my-app --to deploy/backend # Live traffic inspection linkerd viz tap deploy/my-app --to deploy/backend # Service edges (dependencies) linkerd viz edges deployment -n my-namespace ``` ### Template 5: Grafana Dashboard JSON ```json { "dashboard": { "title": "Service Mesh Overview", "panels": [ { "title": "Request Rate", "type": "graph", "targets": [ { "expr": "sum(rate(istio_requests_total{reporter=\"destination\"}[5m])) by (destination_service_name)", "legendFormat": "{{destination_service_name}}" } ] }, { "title": "Error Rate", "type": "gauge", "targets": [ { "expr": "sum(rate(istio_requests_total{response_code=~\"5..\"}[5m])) / sum(rate(istio_requests_total[5m])) * 100" } ], "fieldConfig": { "defaults": { "thresholds": { "steps": [ { "value": 0, "color": "green" }, { "value": 1, "color": "yellow" }, { "value": 5, "color": "red" } ] } } } }, { "title": "P99 Latency", "type": "graph", "targets": [ { "expr": "histogram_quantile(0.99, sum(rate(istio_request_duration_milliseconds_bucket{reporter=\"destination\"}[5m])) by (le, destination_service_name))", "legendFormat": "{{destination_service_name}}" } ] }, { "title": "Service Topology", "type": "nodeGraph", "targets": [ { "expr": "sum(rate(istio_requests_total{reporter=\"destination\"}[5m])) by (source_workload, destination_service_name)" } ] } ] } } ``` ### Template 6: Kiali Service Mesh Visualization ```yaml # Kiali installation apiVersion: kiali.io/v1alpha1 kind: Kiali metadata: name: kiali namespace: istio-system spec: auth: strategy: anonymous # or openid, token deployment: accessible_namespaces: - "**" external_services: prometheus: url: http://prometheus.istio-system:9090 tracing: url: http://jaeger-query.istio-system:16686 grafana: url: http://grafana.istio-system:3000 ``` ### Template 7: OpenTelemetry Integration ```yaml # OpenTelemetry Collector for mesh apiVersion: v1 kind: ConfigMap metadata: name: otel-collector-config data: config.yaml: | receivers: otlp: protocols: grpc: endpoint: 0.0.0.0:4317 http: endpoint: 0.0.0.0:4318 zipkin: endpoint: 0.0.0.0:9411 processors: batch: timeout: 10s exporters: jaeger: endpoint: jaeger-collector:14250 tls: insecure: true prometheus: endpoint: 0.0.0.0:8889 service: pipelines: traces: receivers: [otlp, zipkin] processors: [batch] exporters: [jaeger] metrics: receivers: [otlp] processors: [batch] exporters: [prometheus] --- # Istio Telemetry v2 with OTel apiVersion: telemetry.istio.io/v1alpha1 kind: Telemetry metadata: name: mesh-default namespace: istio-system spec: tracing: - providers: - name: otel randomSamplingPercentage: 10 ``` ## Alerting Rules ```yaml apiVersion: monitoring.coreos.com/v1 kind: PrometheusRule metadata: name: mesh-alerts namespace: istio-system spec: groups: - name: mesh.rules rules: - alert: HighErrorRate expr: | sum(rate(istio_requests_total{response_code=~"5.."}[5m])) by (destination_service_name) / sum(rate(istio_requests_total[5m])) by (destination_service_name) > 0.05 for: 5m labels: severity: critical annotations: summary: "High error rate for {{ $labels.destination_service_name }}" - alert: HighLatency expr: | histogram_quantile(0.99, sum(rate(istio_request_duration_milliseconds_bucket[5m])) by (le, destination_service_name)) > 1000 for: 5m labels: severity: warning annotations: summary: "High P99 latency for {{ $labels.destination_service_name }}" - alert: MeshCertExpiring expr: | (certmanager_certificate_expiration_timestamp_seconds - time()) / 86400 < 7 labels: severity: warning annotations: summary: "Mesh certificate expiring in less than 7 days" ``` ## Best Practices ### Do's - **Sample appropriately** - 100% in dev, 1-10% in prod - **Use trace context** - Propagate headers consistently - **Set up alerts** - For golden signals - **Correlate metrics/traces** - Use exemplars - **Retain strategically** - Hot/cold storage tiers ### Don'ts - **Don't over-sample** - Storage costs add up - **Don't ignore cardinality** - Limit label values - **Don't skip dashboards** - Visualize dependencies - **Don't forget costs** - Monitor observability costs ## Resources - [Istio Observability](https://istio.io/latest/docs/tasks/observability/) - [Linkerd Observability](https://linkerd.io/2.14/features/dashboard/) - [OpenTelemetry](https://opentelemetry.io/) - [Kiali](https://kiali.io/)
šŸ‘0
šŸ‘ļø0
šŸ¤– Auto-discovered
šŸ¤–system prompt•7 months ago

multi-reviewer-patterns

Coordinate parallel code reviews across multiple quality dimensions

coding
⭐1
# Multi-Reviewer Patterns Patterns for coordinating parallel code reviews across multiple quality dimensions, deduplicating findings, calibrating severity, and producing consolidated reports. ## When to Use This Skill - Organizing a multi-dimensional code review - Deciding which review dimensions to assign - Deduplicating findings from multiple reviewers - Calibrating severity ratings consistently - Producing a consolidated review report ## Review Dimension Allocation ### Available Dimensions | Dimension | Focus | When to Include | | ----------------- | --------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------- | | **Security** | Vulnerabilities, auth, input validation | Always for code handling user input or auth | | **Performance** | Query efficiency, memory, caching | When changing data access or hot paths | | **Architecture** | SOLID, coupling, patterns | For structural changes or new modules | | **Testing** | Coverage, quality, edge cases | When adding new functionality | | **Accessibility** | WCAG, ARIA, keyboard nav | For UI/frontend changes | ### Recommended Combinations | Scenario | Dimensions | | ---------------------- | -------------------------------------------- | | API endpoint changes | Security, Performance, Architecture | | Frontend component | Architecture, Testing, Accessibility | | Database migration | Performance, Architecture | | Authentication changes | Security, Testing | | Full feature review | Security, Performance, Architecture, Testing | ## Finding Deduplication When multiple reviewers report issues at the same location: ### Merge Rules 1. **Same file:line, same issue** — Merge into one finding, credit all reviewers 2. **Same file:line, different issues** — Keep as separate findings 3. **Same issue, different locations** — Keep separate but cross-reference 4. **Conflicting severity** — Use the higher severity rating 5. **Conflicting recommendations** — Include both with reviewer attribution ### Deduplication Process ``` For each finding in all reviewer reports: 1. Check if another finding references the same file:line 2. If yes, check if they describe the same issue 3. If same issue: merge, keeping the more detailed description 4. If different issue: keep both, tag as "co-located" 5. Use highest severity among merged findings ``` ## Severity Calibration ### Severity Criteria | Severity | Impact | Likelihood | Examples | | ------------ | --------------------------------------------- | ---------------------- | -------------------------------------------- | | **Critical** | Data loss, security breach, complete failure | Certain or very likely | SQL injection, auth bypass, data corruption | | **High** | Significant functionality impact, degradation | Likely | Memory leak, missing validation, broken flow | | **Medium** | Partial impact, workaround exists | Possible | N+1 query, missing edge case, unclear error | | **Low** | Minimal impact, cosmetic | Unlikely | Style issue, minor optimization, naming | ### Calibration Rules - Security vulnerabilities exploitable by external users: always Critical or High - Performance issues in hot paths: at least Medium - Missing tests for critical paths: at least Medium - Accessibility violations for core functionality: at least Medium - Code style issues with no functional impact: Low ## Consolidated Report Template ```markdown ## Code Review Report **Target**: {files/PR/directory} **Reviewers**: {dimension-1}, {dimension-2}, {dimension-3} **Date**: {date} **Files Reviewed**: {count} ### Critical Findings ({count}) #### [CR-001] {Title} **Location**: `{file}:{line}` **Dimension**: {Security/Performance/etc.} **Description**: {what was found} **Impact**: {what could happen} **Fix**: {recommended remediation} ### High Findings ({count}) ... ### Medium Findings ({count}) ... ### Low Findings ({count}) ... ### Summary | Dimension | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Total | | ------------ | -------- | ----- | ------ | ----- | ------ | | Security | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 6 | | Performance | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7 | | Architecture | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | | **Total** | **1** | **3** | **9** | **5** | **18** | ### Recommendation {Overall assessment and prioritized action items} ```
šŸ‘0
šŸ‘ļø1
šŸ¤– Auto-discovered
šŸ¤–system prompt•7 months ago

track-management

Use this skill when creating, managing, or working with Conductor

coding
⭐1
# Track Management Guide for creating, managing, and completing Conductor tracks - the logical work units that organize features, bugs, and refactors through specification, planning, and implementation phases. ## When to Use This Skill - Creating new feature, bug, or refactor tracks - Writing or reviewing spec.md files - Creating or updating plan.md files - Managing track lifecycle from creation to completion - Understanding track status markers and conventions - Working with the tracks.md registry - Interpreting or updating track metadata ## Track Concept A track is a logical work unit that encapsulates a complete piece of work. Each track has: - A unique identifier - A specification defining requirements - A phased plan breaking work into tasks - Metadata tracking status and progress Tracks provide semantic organization for work, enabling: - Clear scope boundaries - Progress tracking - Git-aware operations (revert by track) - Team coordination ## Track Types ### feature New functionality or capabilities. Use for: - New user-facing features - New API endpoints - New integrations - Significant enhancements ### bug Defect fixes. Use for: - Incorrect behavior - Error conditions - Performance regressions - Security vulnerabilities ### chore Maintenance and housekeeping. Use for: - Dependency updates - Configuration changes - Documentation updates - Cleanup tasks ### refactor Code improvement without behavior change. Use for: - Code restructuring - Pattern adoption - Technical debt reduction - Performance optimization (same behavior, better performance) ## Track ID Format Track IDs follow the pattern: `{shortname}_{YYYYMMDD}` - **shortname**: 2-4 word kebab-case description (e.g., `user-auth`, `api-rate-limit`) - **YYYYMMDD**: Creation date in ISO format Examples: - `user-auth_20250115` - `fix-login-error_20250115` - `upgrade-deps_20250115` - `refactor-api-client_20250115` ## Track Lifecycle ### 1. Creation (newTrack) **Define Requirements** 1. Gather requirements through interactive Q&A 2. Identify acceptance criteria 3. Determine scope boundaries 4. Identify dependencies **Generate Specification** 1. Create `spec.md` with structured requirements 2. Document functional and non-functional requirements 3. Define acceptance criteria 4. List dependencies and constraints **Generate Plan** 1. Create `plan.md` with phased task breakdown 2. Organize tasks into logical phases 3. Add verification tasks after phases 4. Estimate effort and complexity **Register Track** 1. Add entry to `tracks.md` registry 2. Create track directory structure 3. Generate `metadata.json` 4. Create track `index.md` ### 2. Implementation **Execute Tasks** 1. Select next pending task from plan 2. Mark task as in-progress 3. Implement following workflow (TDD) 4. Mark task complete with commit SHA **Update Status** 1. Update task markers in plan.md 2. Record commit SHAs for traceability 3. Update phase progress 4. Update track status in tracks.md **Verify Progress** 1. Complete verification tasks 2. Wait for checkpoint approval 3. Record checkpoint commits ### 3. Completion **Sync Documentation** 1. Update product.md if features added 2. Update tech-stack.md if dependencies changed 3. Verify all acceptance criteria met **Archive or Delete** 1. Mark track as completed in tracks.md 2. Record completion date 3. Archive or retain track directory ## Specification (spec.md) Structure ```markdown # {Track Title} ## Overview Brief description of what this track accomplishes and why. ## Functional Requirements ### FR-1: {Requirement Name} Description of the functional requirement. - Acceptance: How to verify this requirement is met ### FR-2: {Requirement Name} ... ## Non-Functional Requirements ### NFR-1: {Requirement Name} Description of the non-functional requirement (performance, security, etc.) - Target: Specific measurable target - Verification: How to test ## Acceptance Criteria - [ ] Criterion 1: Specific, testable condition - [ ] Criterion 2: Specific, testable condition - [ ] Criterion 3: Specific, testable condition ## Scope ### In Scope - Explicitly included items - Features to implement - Components to modify ### Out of Scope - Explicitly excluded items - Future considerations - Related but separate work ## Dependencies ### Internal - Other tracks or components this depends on - Required context artifacts ### External - Third-party services or APIs - External dependencies ## Risks and Mitigations | Risk | Impact | Mitigation | | ---------------- | --------------- | ------------------- | | Risk description | High/Medium/Low | Mitigation strategy | ## Open Questions - [ ] Question that needs resolution - [x] Resolved question - Answer ``` ## Plan (plan.md) Structure ```markdown # Implementation Plan: {Track Title} Track ID: `{track-id}` Created: YYYY-MM-DD Status: pending | in-progress | completed ## Overview Brief description of implementation approach. ## Phase 1: {Phase Name} ### Tasks - [ ] **Task 1.1**: Task description - Sub-task or detail - Sub-task or detail - [ ] **Task 1.2**: Task description - [ ] **Task 1.3**: Task description ### Verification - [ ] **Verify 1.1**: Verification step for phase ## Phase 2: {Phase Name} ### Tasks - [ ] **Task 2.1**: Task description - [ ] **Task 2.2**: Task description ### Verification - [ ] **Verify 2.1**: Verification step for phase ## Phase 3: Finalization ### Tasks - [ ] **Task 3.1**: Update documentation - [ ] **Task 3.2**: Final integration test ### Verification - [ ] **Verify 3.1**: All acceptance criteria met ## Checkpoints | Phase | Checkpoint SHA | Date | Status | | ------- | -------------- | ---- | ------- | | Phase 1 | | | pending | | Phase 2 | | | pending | | Phase 3 | | | pending | ``` ## Status Marker Conventions Use consistent markers in plan.md: | Marker | Meaning | Usage | | ------ | ----------- | --------------------------- | | `[ ]` | Pending | Task not started | | `[~]` | In Progress | Currently being worked | | `[x]` | Complete | Task finished (include SHA) | | `[-]` | Skipped | Intentionally not done | | `[!]` | Blocked | Waiting on dependency | Example: ```markdown - [x] **Task 1.1**: Set up database schema `abc1234` - [~] **Task 1.2**: Implement user model - [ ] **Task 1.3**: Add validation logic - [!] **Task 1.4**: Integrate auth service (blocked: waiting for API key) - [-] **Task 1.5**: Legacy migration (skipped: not needed) ``` ## Track Registry (tracks.md) Format ```markdown # Track Registry ## Active Tracks | Track ID | Type | Status | Phase | Started | Assignee | | ------------------------------------------------ | ------- | ----------- | ----- | ---------- | ---------- | | [user-auth_20250115](tracks/user-auth_20250115/) | feature | in-progress | 2/3 | 2025-01-15 | @developer | | [fix-login_20250114](tracks/fix-login_20250114/) | bug | pending | 0/2 | 2025-01-14 | - | ## Completed Tracks | Track ID | Type | Completed | Duration | | ---------------------------------------------- | ----- | ---------- | -------- | | [setup-ci_20250110](tracks/setup-ci_20250110/) | chore | 2025-01-12 | 2 days | ## Archived Tracks | Track ID | Reason | Archived | | ---------------------------------------------------- | ---------- | ---------- | | [old-feature_20241201](tracks/old-feature_20241201/) | Superseded | 2025-01-05 | ``` ## Metadata (metadata.json) Fields ```json { "id": "user-auth_20250115", "title": "User Authentication System", "type": "feature", "status": "in-progress", "priority": "high", "created": "2025-01-15T10:30:00Z", "updated": "2025-01-15T14:45:00Z", "started": "2025-01-15T11:00:00Z", "completed": null, "assignee": "@developer", "phases": { "total": 3, "current": 2, "completed": 1 }, "tasks": { "total": 12, "completed": 5, "in_progress": 1, "pending": 6 }, "checkpoints": [ { "phase": 1, "sha": "abc1234", "date": "2025-01-15T13:00:00Z" } ], "dependencies": [], "tags": ["auth", "security"] } ``` ## Track Operations ### Creating a Track 1. Run `/conductor:new-track` 2. Answer interactive questions 3. Review generated spec.md 4. Review generated plan.md 5. Confirm track creation ### Starting Implementation 1. Read spec.md and plan.md 2. Verify context artifacts are current 3. Mark first task as `[~]` 4. Begin TDD workflow ### Completing a Phase 1. Ensure all phase tasks are `[x]` 2. Complete verification tasks 3. Wait for checkpoint approval 4. Record checkpoint SHA 5. Proceed to next phase ### Completing a Track 1. Verify all phases complete 2. Verify all acceptance criteria met 3. Update product.md if needed 4. Mark track completed in tracks.md 5. Update metadata.json ### Reverting a Track 1. Run `/conductor:revert` 2. Select track to revert 3. Choose granularity (track/phase/task) 4. Confirm revert operation 5. Update status markers ## Handling Track Dependencies ### Identifying Dependencies During track creation, identify: - **Hard dependencies**: Must complete before this track can start - **Soft dependencies**: Can proceed in parallel but may affect integration - **External dependencies**: Third-party services, APIs, or team decisions ### Documenting Dependencies In spec.md, list dependencies with: - Dependency type (hard/soft/external) - Current status (available/pending/blocked) - Resolution path (what needs to happen) ### Managing Blocked Tracks When a track is blocked: 1. Mark blocked tasks with `[!]` and reason 2. Update tracks.md status 3. Document blocker in metadata.json 4. Consider creating dependency track if needed ## Track Sizing Guidelines ### Right-Sized Tracks Aim for tracks that: - Complete in 1-5 days of work - Have 2-4 phases - Contain 8-20 tasks total - Deliver a coherent, testable unit ### Too Large Signs a track is too large: - More than 5 phases - More than 25 tasks - Multiple unrelated features - Estimated duration > 1 week Solution: Split into multiple tracks with clear boundaries. ### Too Small Signs a track is too small: - Single phase with 1-2 tasks - No meaningful verification needed - Could be a sub-task of another track - Less than a few hours of work Solution: Combine with related work or handle as part of existing track. ## Specification Quality Checklist Before finalizing spec.md, verify: ### Requirements Quality - [ ] Each requirement has clear acceptance criteria - [ ] Requirements are testable - [ ] Requirements are independent (can verify separately) - [ ] No ambiguous language ("should be fast" → "response < 200ms") ### Scope Clarity - [ ] In-scope items are specific - [ ] Out-of-scope items prevent scope creep - [ ] Boundaries are clear to implementer ### Dependencies Identified - [ ] All internal dependencies listed - [ ] External dependencies have owners/contacts - [ ] Dependency status is current ### Risks Addressed - [ ] Major risks identified - [ ] Impact assessment realistic - [ ] Mitigations are actionable ## Plan Quality Checklist Before starting implementation, verify plan.md: ### Task Quality - [ ] Tasks are atomic (one logical action) - [ ] Tasks are independently verifiable - [ ] Task descriptions are clear - [ ] Sub-tasks provide helpful detail ### Phase Organization - [ ] Phases group related tasks - [ ] Each phase delivers something testable - [ ] Verification tasks after each phase - [ ] Phases build on each other logically ### Completeness - [ ] All spec requirements have corresponding tasks - [ ] Documentation tasks included - [ ] Testing tasks included - [ ] Integration tasks included ## Common Track Patterns ### Feature Track Pattern ``` Phase 1: Foundation - Data models - Database migrations - Basic API structure Phase 2: Core Logic - Business logic implementation - Input validation - Error handling Phase 3: Integration - UI integration - API documentation - End-to-end tests ``` ### Bug Fix Track Pattern ``` Phase 1: Reproduction - Write failing test capturing bug - Document reproduction steps Phase 2: Fix - Implement fix - Verify test passes - Check for regressions Phase 3: Verification - Manual verification - Update documentation if needed ``` ### Refactor Track Pattern ``` Phase 1: Preparation - Add characterization tests - Document current behavior Phase 2: Refactoring - Apply changes incrementally - Maintain green tests throughout Phase 3: Cleanup - Remove dead code - Update documentation ``` ## Best Practices 1. **One track, one concern**: Keep tracks focused on a single logical change 2. **Small phases**: Break work into phases of 3-5 tasks maximum 3. **Verification after phases**: Always include verification tasks 4. **Update markers immediately**: Mark task status as you work 5. **Record SHAs**: Always note commit SHAs for completed tasks 6. **Review specs before planning**: Ensure spec is complete before creating plan 7. **Link dependencies**: Explicitly note track dependencies 8. **Archive, don't delete**: Preserve completed tracks for reference 9. **Size appropriately**: Keep tracks between 1-5 days of work 10. **Clear acceptance criteria**: Every requirement must be testable
šŸ‘0
šŸ‘ļø0
šŸ¤– Auto-discovered
šŸ¤–system prompt•7 months ago

workflow-patterns

Use this skill when implementing tasks according to Conductor's TDD

coding
⭐1
# Workflow Patterns Guide for implementing tasks using Conductor's TDD workflow, managing phase checkpoints, handling git commits, and executing the verification protocol that ensures quality throughout implementation. ## When to Use This Skill - Implementing tasks from a track's plan.md - Following TDD red-green-refactor cycle - Completing phase checkpoints - Managing git commits and notes - Understanding quality assurance gates - Handling verification protocols - Recording progress in plan files ## TDD Task Lifecycle Follow these 11 steps for each task: ### Step 1: Select Next Task Read plan.md and identify the next pending `[ ]` task. Select tasks in order within the current phase. Do not skip ahead to later phases. ### Step 2: Mark as In Progress Update plan.md to mark the task as `[~]`: ```markdown - [~] **Task 2.1**: Implement user validation ``` Commit this status change separately from implementation. ### Step 3: RED - Write Failing Tests Write tests that define the expected behavior before writing implementation: - Create test file if needed - Write test cases covering happy path - Write test cases covering edge cases - Write test cases covering error conditions - Run tests - they should FAIL Example: ```python def test_validate_user_email_valid(): user = User(email="test@example.com") assert user.validate_email() is True def test_validate_user_email_invalid(): user = User(email="invalid") assert user.validate_email() is False ``` ### Step 4: GREEN - Implement Minimum Code Write the minimum code necessary to make tests pass: - Focus on making tests green, not perfection - Avoid premature optimization - Keep implementation simple - Run tests - they should PASS ### Step 5: REFACTOR - Improve Clarity With green tests, improve the code: - Extract common patterns - Improve naming - Remove duplication - Simplify logic - Run tests after each change - they should remain GREEN ### Step 6: Verify Coverage Check test coverage meets the 80% target: ```bash pytest --cov=module --cov-report=term-missing ``` If coverage is below 80%: - Identify uncovered lines - Add tests for missing paths - Re-run coverage check ### Step 7: Document Deviations If implementation deviated from plan or introduced new dependencies: - Update tech-stack.md with new dependencies - Note deviations in plan.md task comments - Update spec.md if requirements changed ### Step 8: Commit Implementation Create a focused commit for the task: ```bash git add -A git commit -m "feat(user): implement email validation - Add validate_email method to User class - Handle empty and malformed emails - Add comprehensive test coverage Task: 2.1 Track: user-auth_20250115" ``` Commit message format: - Type: feat, fix, refactor, test, docs, chore - Scope: affected module or component - Summary: imperative, present tense - Body: bullet points of changes - Footer: task and track references ### Step 9: Attach Git Notes Add rich task summary as git note: ```bash git notes add -m "Task 2.1: Implement user validation Summary: - Added email validation using regex pattern - Handles edge cases: empty, no @, no domain - Coverage: 94% on validation module Files changed: - src/models/user.py (modified) - tests/test_user.py (modified) Decisions: - Used simple regex over email-validator library - Reason: No external dependency for basic validation" ``` ### Step 10: Update Plan with SHA Update plan.md to mark task complete with commit SHA: ```markdown - [x] **Task 2.1**: Implement user validation `abc1234` ``` ### Step 11: Commit Plan Update Commit the plan status update: ```bash git add conductor/tracks/*/plan.md git commit -m "docs: update plan - task 2.1 complete Track: user-auth_20250115" ``` ## Phase Completion Protocol When all tasks in a phase are complete, execute the verification protocol: ### Identify Changed Files List all files modified since the last checkpoint: ```bash git diff --name-only <last-checkpoint-sha>..HEAD ``` ### Ensure Test Coverage For each modified file: 1. Identify corresponding test file 2. Verify tests exist for new/changed code 3. Run coverage for modified modules 4. Add tests if coverage < 80% ### Run Full Test Suite Execute complete test suite: ```bash pytest -v --tb=short ``` All tests must pass before proceeding. ### Generate Manual Verification Steps Create checklist of manual verifications: ```markdown ## Phase 1 Verification Checklist - [ ] User can register with valid email - [ ] Invalid email shows appropriate error - [ ] Database stores user correctly - [ ] API returns expected response codes ``` ### WAIT for User Approval Present verification checklist to user: ``` Phase 1 complete. Please verify: 1. [ ] Test suite passes (automated) 2. [ ] Coverage meets target (automated) 3. [ ] Manual verification items (requires human) Respond with 'approved' to continue, or note issues. ``` Do NOT proceed without explicit approval. ### Create Checkpoint Commit After approval, create checkpoint commit: ```bash git add -A git commit -m "checkpoint: phase 1 complete - user-auth_20250115 Verified: - All tests passing - Coverage: 87% - Manual verification approved Phase 1 tasks: - [x] Task 1.1: Setup database schema - [x] Task 1.2: Implement user model - [x] Task 1.3: Add validation logic" ``` ### Record Checkpoint SHA Update plan.md checkpoints table: ```markdown ## Checkpoints | Phase | Checkpoint SHA | Date | Status | | ------- | -------------- | ---------- | -------- | | Phase 1 | def5678 | 2025-01-15 | verified | | Phase 2 | | | pending | ``` ## Quality Assurance Gates Before marking any task complete, verify these gates: ### Passing Tests - All existing tests pass - New tests pass - No test regressions ### Coverage >= 80% - New code has 80%+ coverage - Overall project coverage maintained - Critical paths fully covered ### Style Compliance - Code follows style guides - Linting passes - Formatting correct ### Documentation - Public APIs documented - Complex logic explained - README updated if needed ### Type Safety - Type hints present (if applicable) - Type checker passes - No type: ignore without reason ### No Linting Errors - Zero linter errors - Warnings addressed or justified - Static analysis clean ### Mobile Compatibility If applicable: - Responsive design verified - Touch interactions work - Performance acceptable ### Security Audit - No secrets in code - Input validation present - Authentication/authorization correct - Dependencies vulnerability-free ## Git Integration ### Commit Message Format ``` <type>(<scope>): <subject> <body> <footer> ``` Types: - `feat`: New feature - `fix`: Bug fix - `refactor`: Code change without feature/fix - `test`: Adding tests - `docs`: Documentation - `chore`: Maintenance ### Git Notes for Rich Summaries Attach detailed notes to commits: ```bash git notes add -m "<detailed summary>" ``` View notes: ```bash git log --show-notes ``` Benefits: - Preserves context without cluttering commit message - Enables semantic queries across commits - Supports track-based operations ### SHA Recording in plan.md Always record the commit SHA when completing tasks: ```markdown - [x] **Task 1.1**: Setup schema `abc1234` - [x] **Task 1.2**: Add model `def5678` ``` This enables: - Traceability from plan to code - Semantic revert operations - Progress auditing ## Verification Checkpoints ### Why Checkpoints Matter Checkpoints create restore points for semantic reversion: - Revert to end of any phase - Maintain logical code state - Enable safe experimentation ### When to Create Checkpoints Create checkpoint after: - All phase tasks complete - All phase verifications pass - User approval received ### Checkpoint Commit Content Include in checkpoint commit: - All uncommitted changes - Updated plan.md - Updated metadata.json - Any documentation updates ### How to Use Checkpoints For reverting: ```bash # Revert to end of Phase 1 git revert --no-commit <phase-2-commits>... git commit -m "revert: rollback to phase 1 checkpoint" ``` For review: ```bash # See what changed in Phase 2 git diff <phase-1-sha>..<phase-2-sha> ``` ## Handling Deviations During implementation, deviations from the plan may occur. Handle them systematically: ### Types of Deviations **Scope Addition** Discovered requirement not in original spec. - Document in spec.md as new requirement - Add tasks to plan.md - Note addition in task comments **Scope Reduction** Feature deemed unnecessary during implementation. - Mark tasks as `[-]` (skipped) with reason - Update spec.md scope section - Document decision rationale **Technical Deviation** Different implementation approach than planned. - Note deviation in task completion comment - Update tech-stack.md if dependencies changed - Document why original approach was unsuitable **Requirement Change** Understanding of requirement changes during work. - Update spec.md with corrected requirement - Adjust plan.md tasks if needed - Re-verify acceptance criteria ### Deviation Documentation Format When completing a task with deviation: ```markdown - [x] **Task 2.1**: Implement validation `abc1234` - DEVIATION: Used library instead of custom code - Reason: Better edge case handling - Impact: Added email-validator to dependencies ``` ## Error Recovery ### Failed Tests After GREEN If tests fail after reaching GREEN: 1. Do NOT proceed to REFACTOR 2. Identify which test started failing 3. Check if refactoring broke something 4. Revert to last known GREEN state 5. Re-approach the implementation ### Checkpoint Rejection If user rejects a checkpoint: 1. Note rejection reason in plan.md 2. Create tasks to address issues 3. Complete remediation tasks 4. Request checkpoint approval again ### Blocked by Dependency If task cannot proceed: 1. Mark task as `[!]` with blocker description 2. Check if other tasks can proceed 3. Document expected resolution timeline 4. Consider creating dependency resolution track ## TDD Variations by Task Type ### Data Model Tasks ``` RED: Write test for model creation and validation GREEN: Implement model class with fields REFACTOR: Add computed properties, improve types ``` ### API Endpoint Tasks ``` RED: Write test for request/response contract GREEN: Implement endpoint handler REFACTOR: Extract validation, improve error handling ``` ### Integration Tasks ``` RED: Write test for component interaction GREEN: Wire components together REFACTOR: Improve error propagation, add logging ``` ### Refactoring Tasks ``` RED: Add characterization tests for current behavior GREEN: Apply refactoring (tests should stay green) REFACTOR: Clean up any introduced complexity ``` ## Working with Existing Tests When modifying code with existing tests: ### Extend, Don't Replace - Keep existing tests passing - Add new tests for new behavior - Update tests only when requirements change ### Test Migration When refactoring changes test structure: 1. Run existing tests (should pass) 2. Add new tests for refactored code 3. Migrate test cases to new structure 4. Remove old tests only after new tests pass ### Regression Prevention After any change: 1. Run full test suite 2. Check for unexpected failures 3. Investigate any new failures 4. Fix regressions before proceeding ## Checkpoint Verification Details ### Automated Verification Run before requesting approval: ```bash # Test suite pytest -v --tb=short # Coverage pytest --cov=src --cov-report=term-missing # Linting ruff check src/ tests/ # Type checking (if applicable) mypy src/ ``` ### Manual Verification Guidance For manual items, provide specific instructions: ```markdown ## Manual Verification Steps ### User Registration 1. Navigate to /register 2. Enter valid email: test@example.com 3. Enter password meeting requirements 4. Click Submit 5. Verify success message appears 6. Verify user appears in database ### Error Handling 1. Enter invalid email: "notanemail" 2. Verify error message shows 3. Verify form retains other entered data ``` ## Performance Considerations ### Test Suite Performance Keep test suite fast: - Use fixtures to avoid redundant setup - Mock slow external calls - Run subset during development, full suite at checkpoints ### Commit Performance Keep commits atomic: - One logical change per commit - Complete thought, not work-in-progress - Tests should pass after every commit ## Best Practices 1. **Never skip RED**: Always write failing tests first 2. **Small commits**: One logical change per commit 3. **Immediate updates**: Update plan.md right after task completion 4. **Wait for approval**: Never skip checkpoint verification 5. **Rich git notes**: Include context that helps future understanding 6. **Coverage discipline**: Don't accept coverage below target 7. **Quality gates**: Check all gates before marking complete 8. **Sequential phases**: Complete phases in order 9. **Document deviations**: Note any changes from original plan 10. **Clean state**: Each commit should leave code in working state 11. **Fast feedback**: Run relevant tests frequently during development 12. **Clear blockers**: Address blockers promptly, don't work around them
šŸ‘0
šŸ‘ļø0
šŸ¤– Auto-discovered
šŸ¤–system prompt•7 months ago

auth-implementation-patterns

Master authentication and authorization patterns including JWT,

coding
⭐1
# Authentication & Authorization Implementation Patterns Build secure, scalable authentication and authorization systems using industry-standard patterns and modern best practices. ## When to Use This Skill - Implementing user authentication systems - Securing REST or GraphQL APIs - Adding OAuth2/social login - Implementing role-based access control (RBAC) - Designing session management - Migrating authentication systems - Debugging auth issues - Implementing SSO or multi-tenancy ## Core Concepts ### 1. Authentication vs Authorization **Authentication (AuthN)**: Who are you? - Verifying identity (username/password, OAuth, biometrics) - Issuing credentials (sessions, tokens) - Managing login/logout **Authorization (AuthZ)**: What can you do? - Permission checking - Role-based access control (RBAC) - Resource ownership validation - Policy enforcement ### 2. Authentication Strategies **Session-Based:** - Server stores session state - Session ID in cookie - Traditional, simple, stateful **Token-Based (JWT):** - Stateless, self-contained - Scales horizontally - Can store claims **OAuth2/OpenID Connect:** - Delegate authentication - Social login (Google, GitHub) - Enterprise SSO ## JWT Authentication ### Pattern 1: JWT Implementation ```typescript // JWT structure: header.payload.signature import jwt from "jsonwebtoken"; import { Request, Response, NextFunction } from "express"; interface JWTPayload { userId: string; email: string; role: string; iat: number; exp: number; } // Generate JWT function generateTokens(userId: string, email: string, role: string) { const accessToken = jwt.sign( { userId, email, role }, process.env.JWT_SECRET!, { expiresIn: "15m" }, // Short-lived ); const refreshToken = jwt.sign( { userId }, process.env.JWT_REFRESH_SECRET!, { expiresIn: "7d" }, // Long-lived ); return { accessToken, refreshToken }; } // Verify JWT function verifyToken(token: string): JWTPayload { try { return jwt.verify(token, process.env.JWT_SECRET!) as JWTPayload; } catch (error) { if (error instanceof jwt.TokenExpiredError) { throw new Error("Token expired"); } if (error instanceof jwt.JsonWebTokenError) { throw new Error("Invalid token"); } throw error; } } // Middleware function authenticate(req: Request, res: Response, next: NextFunction) { const authHeader = req.headers.authorization; if (!authHeader?.startsWith("Bearer ")) { return res.status(401).json({ error: "No token provided" }); } const token = authHeader.substring(7); try { const payload = verifyToken(token); req.user = payload; // Attach user to request next(); } catch (error) { return res.status(401).json({ error: "Invalid token" }); } } // Usage app.get("/api/profile", authenticate, (req, res) => { res.json({ user: req.user }); }); ``` ### Pattern 2: Refresh Token Flow ```typescript interface StoredRefreshToken { token: string; userId: string; expiresAt: Date; createdAt: Date; } class RefreshTokenService { // Store refresh token in database async storeRefreshToken(userId: string, refreshToken: string) { const expiresAt = new Date(Date.now() + 7 * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000); await db.refreshTokens.create({ token: await hash(refreshToken), // Hash before storing userId, expiresAt, }); } // Refresh access token async refreshAccessToken(refreshToken: string) { // Verify refresh token let payload; try { payload = jwt.verify(refreshToken, process.env.JWT_REFRESH_SECRET!) as { userId: string; }; } catch { throw new Error("Invalid refresh token"); } // Check if token exists in database const storedToken = await db.refreshTokens.findOne({ where: { token: await hash(refreshToken), userId: payload.userId, expiresAt: { $gt: new Date() }, }, }); if (!storedToken) { throw new Error("Refresh token not found or expired"); } // Get user const user = await db.users.findById(payload.userId); if (!user) { throw new Error("User not found"); } // Generate new access token const accessToken = jwt.sign( { userId: user.id, email: user.email, role: user.role }, process.env.JWT_SECRET!, { expiresIn: "15m" }, ); return { accessToken }; } // Revoke refresh token (logout) async revokeRefreshToken(refreshToken: string) { await db.refreshTokens.deleteOne({ token: await hash(refreshToken), }); } // Revoke all user tokens (logout all devices) async revokeAllUserTokens(userId: string) { await db.refreshTokens.deleteMany({ userId }); } } // API endpoints app.post("/api/auth/refresh", async (req, res) => { const { refreshToken } = req.body; try { const { accessToken } = await refreshTokenService.refreshAccessToken(refreshToken); res.json({ accessToken }); } catch (error) { res.status(401).json({ error: "Invalid refresh token" }); } }); app.post("/api/auth/logout", authenticate, async (req, res) => { const { refreshToken } = req.body; await refreshTokenService.revokeRefreshToken(refreshToken); res.json({ message: "Logged out successfully" }); }); ``` ## Session-Based Authentication ### Pattern 1: Express Session ```typescript import session from "express-session"; import RedisStore from "connect-redis"; import { createClient } from "redis"; // Setup Redis for session storage const redisClient = createClient({ url: process.env.REDIS_URL, }); await redisClient.connect(); app.use( session({ store: new RedisStore({ client: redisClient }), secret: process.env.SESSION_SECRET!, resave: false, saveUninitialized: false, cookie: { secure: process.env.NODE_ENV === "production", // HTTPS only httpOnly: true, // No JavaScript access maxAge: 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000, // 24 hours sameSite: "strict", // CSRF protection }, }), ); // Login app.post("/api/auth/login", async (req, res) => { const { email, password } = req.body; const user = await db.users.findOne({ email }); if (!user || !(await verifyPassword(password, user.passwordHash))) { return res.status(401).json({ error: "Invalid credentials" }); } // Store user in session req.session.userId = user.id; req.session.role = user.role; res.json({ user: { id: user.id, email: user.email, role: user.role } }); }); // Session middleware function requireAuth(req: Request, res: Response, next: NextFunction) { if (!req.session.userId) { return res.status(401).json({ error: "Not authenticated" }); } next(); } // Protected route app.get("/api/profile", requireAuth, async (req, res) => { const user = await db.users.findById(req.session.userId); res.json({ user }); }); // Logout app.post("/api/auth/logout", (req, res) => { req.session.destroy((err) => { if (err) { return res.status(500).json({ error: "Logout failed" }); } res.clearCookie("connect.sid"); res.json({ message: "Logged out successfully" }); }); }); ``` ## OAuth2 / Social Login ### Pattern 1: OAuth2 with Passport.js ```typescript import passport from "passport"; import { Strategy as GoogleStrategy } from "passport-google-oauth20"; import { Strategy as GitHubStrategy } from "passport-github2"; // Google OAuth passport.use( new GoogleStrategy( { clientID: process.env.GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID!, clientSecret: process.env.GOOGLE_CLIENT_SECRET!, callbackURL: "/api/auth/google/callback", }, async (accessToken, refreshToken, profile, done) => { try { // Find or create user let user = await db.users.findOne({ googleId: profile.id, }); if (!user) { user = await db.users.create({ googleId: profile.id, email: profile.emails?.[0]?.value, name: profile.displayName, avatar: profile.photos?.[0]?.value, }); } return done(null, user); } catch (error) { return done(error, undefined); } }, ), ); // Routes app.get( "/api/auth/google", passport.authenticate("google", { scope: ["profile", "email"], }), ); app.get( "/api/auth/google/callback", passport.authenticate("google", { session: false }), (req, res) => { // Generate JWT const tokens = generateTokens(req.user.id, req.user.email, req.user.role); // Redirect to frontend with token res.redirect( `${process.env.FRONTEND_URL}/auth/callback?token=${tokens.accessToken}`, ); }, ); ``` ## Authorization Patterns ### Pattern 1: Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) ```typescript enum Role { USER = "user", MODERATOR = "moderator", ADMIN = "admin", } const roleHierarchy: Record<Role, Role[]> = { [Role.ADMIN]: [Role.ADMIN, Role.MODERATOR, Role.USER], [Role.MODERATOR]: [Role.MODERATOR, Role.USER], [Role.USER]: [Role.USER], }; function hasRole(userRole: Role, requiredRole: Role): boolean { return roleHierarchy[userRole].includes(requiredRole); } // Middleware function requireRole(...roles: Role[]) { return (req: Request, res: Response, next: NextFunction) => { if (!req.user) { return res.status(401).json({ error: "Not authenticated" }); } if (!roles.some((role) => hasRole(req.user.role, role))) { return res.status(403).json({ error: "Insufficient permissions" }); } next(); }; } // Usage app.delete( "/api/users/:id", authenticate, requireRole(Role.ADMIN), async (req, res) => { // Only admins can delete users await db.users.delete(req.params.id); res.json({ message: "User deleted" }); }, ); ``` ### Pattern 2: Permission-Based Access Control ```typescript enum Permission { READ_USERS = "read:users", WRITE_USERS = "write:users", DELETE_USERS = "delete:users", READ_POSTS = "read:posts", WRITE_POSTS = "write:posts", } const rolePermissions: Record<Role, Permission[]> = { [Role.USER]: [Permission.READ_POSTS, Permission.WRITE_POSTS], [Role.MODERATOR]: [ Permission.READ_POSTS, Permission.WRITE_POSTS, Permission.READ_USERS, ], [Role.ADMIN]: Object.values(Permission), }; function hasPermission(userRole: Role, permission: Permission): boolean { return rolePermissions[userRole]?.includes(permission) ?? false; } function requirePermission(...permissions: Permission[]) { return (req: Request, res: Response, next: NextFunction) => { if (!req.user) { return res.status(401).json({ error: "Not authenticated" }); } const hasAllPermissions = permissions.every((permission) => hasPermission(req.user.role, permission), ); if (!hasAllPermissions) { return res.status(403).json({ error: "Insufficient permissions" }); } next(); }; } // Usage app.get( "/api/users", authenticate, requirePermission(Permission.READ_USERS), async (req, res) => { const users = await db.users.findAll(); res.json({ users }); }, ); ``` ### Pattern 3: Resource Ownership ```typescript // Check if user owns resource async function requireOwnership( resourceType: "post" | "comment", resourceIdParam: string = "id", ) { return async (req: Request, res: Response, next: NextFunction) => { if (!req.user) { return res.status(401).json({ error: "Not authenticated" }); } const resourceId = req.params[resourceIdParam]; // Admins can access anything if (req.user.role === Role.ADMIN) { return next(); } // Check ownership let resource; if (resourceType === "post") { resource = await db.posts.findById(resourceId); } else if (resourceType === "comment") { resource = await db.comments.findById(resourceId); } if (!resource) { return res.status(404).json({ error: "Resource not found" }); } if (resource.userId !== req.user.userId) { return res.status(403).json({ error: "Not authorized" }); } next(); }; } // Usage app.put( "/api/posts/:id", authenticate, requireOwnership("post"), async (req, res) => { // User can only update their own posts const post = await db.posts.update(req.params.id, req.body); res.json({ post }); }, ); ``` ## Security Best Practices ### Pattern 1: Password Security ```typescript import bcrypt from "bcrypt"; import { z } from "zod"; // Password validation schema const passwordSchema = z .string() .min(12, "Password must be at least 12 characters") .regex(/[A-Z]/, "Password must contain uppercase letter") .regex(/[a-z]/, "Password must contain lowercase letter") .regex(/[0-9]/, "Password must contain number") .regex(/[^A-Za-z0-9]/, "Password must contain special character"); // Hash password async function hashPassword(password: string): Promise<string> { const saltRounds = 12; // 2^12 iterations return bcrypt.hash(password, saltRounds); } // Verify password async function verifyPassword( password: string, hash: string, ): Promise<boolean> { return bcrypt.compare(password, hash); } // Registration with password validation app.post("/api/auth/register", async (req, res) => { try { const { email, password } = req.body; // Validate password passwordSchema.parse(password); // Check if user exists const existingUser = await db.users.findOne({ email }); if (existingUser) { return res.status(400).json({ error: "Email already registered" }); } // Hash password const passwordHash = await hashPassword(password); // Create user const user = await db.users.create({ email, passwordHash, }); // Generate tokens const tokens = generateTokens(user.id, user.email, user.role); res.status(201).json({ user: { id: user.id, email: user.email }, ...tokens, }); } catch (error) { if (error instanceof z.ZodError) { return res.status(400).json({ error: error.errors[0].message }); } res.status(500).json({ error: "Registration failed" }); } }); ``` ### Pattern 2: Rate Limiting ```typescript import rateLimit from "express-rate-limit"; import RedisStore from "rate-limit-redis"; // Login rate limiter const loginLimiter = rateLimit({ store: new RedisStore({ client: redisClient }), windowMs: 15 * 60 * 1000, // 15 minutes max: 5, // 5 attempts message: "Too many login attempts, please try again later", standardHeaders: true, legacyHeaders: false, }); // API rate limiter const apiLimiter = rateLimit({ windowMs: 60 * 1000, // 1 minute max: 100, // 100 requests per minute standardHeaders: true, }); // Apply to routes app.post("/api/auth/login", loginLimiter, async (req, res) => { // Login logic }); app.use("/api/", apiLimiter); ``` ## Best Practices 1. **Never Store Plain Passwords**: Always hash with bcrypt/argon2 2. **Use HTTPS**: Encrypt data in transit 3. **Short-Lived Access Tokens**: 15-30 minutes max 4. **Secure Cookies**: httpOnly, secure, sameSite flags 5. **Validate All Input**: Email format, password strength 6. **Rate Limit Auth Endpoints**: Prevent brute force attacks 7. **Implement CSRF Protection**: For session-based auth 8. **Rotate Secrets Regularly**: JWT secrets, session secrets 9. **Log Security Events**: Login attempts, failed auth 10. **Use MFA When Possible**: Extra security layer ## Common Pitfalls - **Weak Passwords**: Enforce strong password policies - **JWT in localStorage**: Vulnerable to XSS, use httpOnly cookies - **No Token Expiration**: Tokens should expire - **Client-Side Auth Checks Only**: Always validate server-side - **Insecure Password Reset**: Use secure tokens with expiration - **No Rate Limiting**: Vulnerable to brute force - **Trusting Client Data**: Always validate on server ## Resources - **references/jwt-best-practices.md**: JWT implementation guide - **references/oauth2-flows.md**: OAuth2 flow diagrams and examples - **references/session-security.md**: Secure session management - **assets/auth-security-checklist.md**: Security review checklist - **assets/password-policy-template.md**: Password requirements template - **scripts/token-validator.ts**: JWT validation utility
šŸ‘0
šŸ‘ļø0
šŸ¤– Auto-discovered
šŸ¤–system prompt•7 months ago

e2e-testing-patterns

Master end-to-end testing with Playwright and Cypress to build

coding
⭐1
# E2E Testing Patterns Build reliable, fast, and maintainable end-to-end test suites that provide confidence to ship code quickly and catch regressions before users do. ## When to Use This Skill - Implementing end-to-end test automation - Debugging flaky or unreliable tests - Testing critical user workflows - Setting up CI/CD test pipelines - Testing across multiple browsers - Validating accessibility requirements - Testing responsive designs - Establishing E2E testing standards ## Core Concepts ### 1. E2E Testing Fundamentals **What to Test with E2E:** - Critical user journeys (login, checkout, signup) - Complex interactions (drag-and-drop, multi-step forms) - Cross-browser compatibility - Real API integration - Authentication flows **What NOT to Test with E2E:** - Unit-level logic (use unit tests) - API contracts (use integration tests) - Edge cases (too slow) - Internal implementation details ### 2. Test Philosophy **The Testing Pyramid:** ``` /\ /E2E\ ← Few, focused on critical paths /─────\ /Integr\ ← More, test component interactions /────────\ /Unit Tests\ ← Many, fast, isolated /────────────\ ``` **Best Practices:** - Test user behavior, not implementation - Keep tests independent - Make tests deterministic - Optimize for speed - Use data-testid, not CSS selectors ## Playwright Patterns ### Setup and Configuration ```typescript // playwright.config.ts import { defineConfig, devices } from "@playwright/test"; export default defineConfig({ testDir: "./e2e", timeout: 30000, expect: { timeout: 5000, }, fullyParallel: true, forbidOnly: !!process.env.CI, retries: process.env.CI ? 2 : 0, workers: process.env.CI ? 1 : undefined, reporter: [["html"], ["junit", { outputFile: "results.xml" }]], use: { baseURL: "http://localhost:3000", trace: "on-first-retry", screenshot: "only-on-failure", video: "retain-on-failure", }, projects: [ { name: "chromium", use: { ...devices["Desktop Chrome"] } }, { name: "firefox", use: { ...devices["Desktop Firefox"] } }, { name: "webkit", use: { ...devices["Desktop Safari"] } }, { name: "mobile", use: { ...devices["iPhone 13"] } }, ], }); ``` ### Pattern 1: Page Object Model ```typescript // pages/LoginPage.ts import { Page, Locator } from "@playwright/test"; export class LoginPage { readonly page: Page; readonly emailInput: Locator; readonly passwordInput: Locator; readonly loginButton: Locator; readonly errorMessage: Locator; constructor(page: Page) { this.page = page; this.emailInput = page.getByLabel("Email"); this.passwordInput = page.getByLabel("Password"); this.loginButton = page.getByRole("button", { name: "Login" }); this.errorMessage = page.getByRole("alert"); } async goto() { await this.page.goto("/login"); } async login(email: string, password: string) { await this.emailInput.fill(email); await this.passwordInput.fill(password); await this.loginButton.click(); } async getErrorMessage(): Promise<string> { return (await this.errorMessage.textContent()) ?? ""; } } // Test using Page Object import { test, expect } from "@playwright/test"; import { LoginPage } from "./pages/LoginPage"; test("successful login", async ({ page }) => { const loginPage = new LoginPage(page); await loginPage.goto(); await loginPage.login("user@example.com", "password123"); await expect(page).toHaveURL("/dashboard"); await expect(page.getByRole("heading", { name: "Dashboard" })).toBeVisible(); }); test("failed login shows error", async ({ page }) => { const loginPage = new LoginPage(page); await loginPage.goto(); await loginPage.login("invalid@example.com", "wrong"); const error = await loginPage.getErrorMessage(); expect(error).toContain("Invalid credentials"); }); ``` ### Pattern 2: Fixtures for Test Data ```typescript // fixtures/test-data.ts import { test as base } from "@playwright/test"; type TestData = { testUser: { email: string; password: string; name: string; }; adminUser: { email: string; password: string; }; }; export const test = base.extend<TestData>({ testUser: async ({}, use) => { const user = { email: `test-${Date.now()}@example.com`, password: "Test123!@#", name: "Test User", }; // Setup: Create user in database await createTestUser(user); await use(user); // Teardown: Clean up user await deleteTestUser(user.email); }, adminUser: async ({}, use) => { await use({ email: "admin@example.com", password: process.env.ADMIN_PASSWORD!, }); }, }); // Usage in tests import { test } from "./fixtures/test-data"; test("user can update profile", async ({ page, testUser }) => { await page.goto("/login"); await page.getByLabel("Email").fill(testUser.email); await page.getByLabel("Password").fill(testUser.password); await page.getByRole("button", { name: "Login" }).click(); await page.goto("/profile"); await page.getByLabel("Name").fill("Updated Name"); await page.getByRole("button", { name: "Save" }).click(); await expect(page.getByText("Profile updated")).toBeVisible(); }); ``` ### Pattern 3: Waiting Strategies ```typescript // āŒ Bad: Fixed timeouts await page.waitForTimeout(3000); // Flaky! // āœ… Good: Wait for specific conditions await page.waitForLoadState("networkidle"); await page.waitForURL("/dashboard"); await page.waitForSelector('[data-testid="user-profile"]'); // āœ… Better: Auto-waiting with assertions await expect(page.getByText("Welcome")).toBeVisible(); await expect(page.getByRole("button", { name: "Submit" })).toBeEnabled(); // Wait for API response const responsePromise = page.waitForResponse( (response) => response.url().includes("/api/users") && response.status() === 200, ); await page.getByRole("button", { name: "Load Users" }).click(); const response = await responsePromise; const data = await response.json(); expect(data.users).toHaveLength(10); // Wait for multiple conditions await Promise.all([ page.waitForURL("/success"), page.waitForLoadState("networkidle"), expect(page.getByText("Payment successful")).toBeVisible(), ]); ``` ### Pattern 4: Network Mocking and Interception ```typescript // Mock API responses test("displays error when API fails", async ({ page }) => { await page.route("**/api/users", (route) => { route.fulfill({ status: 500, contentType: "application/json", body: JSON.stringify({ error: "Internal Server Error" }), }); }); await page.goto("/users"); await expect(page.getByText("Failed to load users")).toBeVisible(); }); // Intercept and modify requests test("can modify API request", async ({ page }) => { await page.route("**/api/users", async (route) => { const request = route.request(); const postData = JSON.parse(request.postData() || "{}"); // Modify request postData.role = "admin"; await route.continue({ postData: JSON.stringify(postData), }); }); // Test continues... }); // Mock third-party services test("payment flow with mocked Stripe", async ({ page }) => { await page.route("**/api/stripe/**", (route) => { route.fulfill({ status: 200, body: JSON.stringify({ id: "mock_payment_id", status: "succeeded", }), }); }); // Test payment flow with mocked response }); ``` ## Cypress Patterns ### Setup and Configuration ```typescript // cypress.config.ts import { defineConfig } from "cypress"; export default defineConfig({ e2e: { baseUrl: "http://localhost:3000", viewportWidth: 1280, viewportHeight: 720, video: false, screenshotOnRunFailure: true, defaultCommandTimeout: 10000, requestTimeout: 10000, setupNodeEvents(on, config) { // Implement node event listeners }, }, }); ``` ### Pattern 1: Custom Commands ```typescript // cypress/support/commands.ts declare global { namespace Cypress { interface Chainable { login(email: string, password: string): Chainable<void>; createUser(userData: UserData): Chainable<User>; dataCy(value: string): Chainable<JQuery<HTMLElement>>; } } } Cypress.Commands.add("login", (email: string, password: string) => { cy.visit("/login"); cy.get('[data-testid="email"]').type(email); cy.get('[data-testid="password"]').type(password); cy.get('[data-testid="login-button"]').click(); cy.url().should("include", "/dashboard"); }); Cypress.Commands.add("createUser", (userData: UserData) => { return cy.request("POST", "/api/users", userData).its("body"); }); Cypress.Commands.add("dataCy", (value: string) => { return cy.get(`[data-cy="${value}"]`); }); // Usage cy.login("user@example.com", "password"); cy.dataCy("submit-button").click(); ``` ### Pattern 2: Cypress Intercept ```typescript // Mock API calls cy.intercept("GET", "/api/users", { statusCode: 200, body: [ { id: 1, name: "John" }, { id: 2, name: "Jane" }, ], }).as("getUsers"); cy.visit("/users"); cy.wait("@getUsers"); cy.get('[data-testid="user-list"]').children().should("have.length", 2); // Modify responses cy.intercept("GET", "/api/users", (req) => { req.reply((res) => { // Modify response res.body.users = res.body.users.slice(0, 5); res.send(); }); }); // Simulate slow network cy.intercept("GET", "/api/data", (req) => { req.reply((res) => { res.delay(3000); // 3 second delay res.send(); }); }); ``` ## Advanced Patterns ### Pattern 1: Visual Regression Testing ```typescript // With Playwright import { test, expect } from "@playwright/test"; test("homepage looks correct", async ({ page }) => { await page.goto("/"); await expect(page).toHaveScreenshot("homepage.png", { fullPage: true, maxDiffPixels: 100, }); }); test("button in all states", async ({ page }) => { await page.goto("/components"); const button = page.getByRole("button", { name: "Submit" }); // Default state await expect(button).toHaveScreenshot("button-default.png"); // Hover state await button.hover(); await expect(button).toHaveScreenshot("button-hover.png"); // Disabled state await button.evaluate((el) => el.setAttribute("disabled", "true")); await expect(button).toHaveScreenshot("button-disabled.png"); }); ``` ### Pattern 2: Parallel Testing with Sharding ```typescript // playwright.config.ts export default defineConfig({ projects: [ { name: "shard-1", use: { ...devices["Desktop Chrome"] }, grepInvert: /@slow/, shard: { current: 1, total: 4 }, }, { name: "shard-2", use: { ...devices["Desktop Chrome"] }, shard: { current: 2, total: 4 }, }, // ... more shards ], }); // Run in CI // npx playwright test --shard=1/4 // npx playwright test --shard=2/4 ``` ### Pattern 3: Accessibility Testing ```typescript // Install: npm install @axe-core/playwright import { test, expect } from "@playwright/test"; import AxeBuilder from "@axe-core/playwright"; test("page should not have accessibility violations", async ({ page }) => { await page.goto("/"); const accessibilityScanResults = await new AxeBuilder({ page }) .exclude("#third-party-widget") .analyze(); expect(accessibilityScanResults.violations).toEqual([]); }); test("form is accessible", async ({ page }) => { await page.goto("/signup"); const results = await new AxeBuilder({ page }).include("form").analyze(); expect(results.violations).toEqual([]); }); ``` ## Best Practices 1. **Use Data Attributes**: `data-testid` or `data-cy` for stable selectors 2. **Avoid Brittle Selectors**: Don't rely on CSS classes or DOM structure 3. **Test User Behavior**: Click, type, see - not implementation details 4. **Keep Tests Independent**: Each test should run in isolation 5. **Clean Up Test Data**: Create and destroy test data in each test 6. **Use Page Objects**: Encapsulate page logic 7. **Meaningful Assertions**: Check actual user-visible behavior 8. **Optimize for Speed**: Mock when possible, parallel execution ```typescript // āŒ Bad selectors cy.get(".btn.btn-primary.submit-button").click(); cy.get("div > form > div:nth-child(2) > input").type("text"); // āœ… Good selectors cy.getByRole("button", { name: "Submit" }).click(); cy.getByLabel("Email address").type("user@example.com"); cy.get('[data-testid="email-input"]').type("user@example.com"); ``` ## Common Pitfalls - **Flaky Tests**: Use proper waits, not fixed timeouts - **Slow Tests**: Mock external APIs, use parallel execution - **Over-Testing**: Don't test every edge case with E2E - **Coupled Tests**: Tests should not depend on each other - **Poor Selectors**: Avoid CSS classes and nth-child - **No Cleanup**: Clean up test data after each test - **Testing Implementation**: Test user behavior, not internals ## Debugging Failing Tests ```typescript // Playwright debugging // 1. Run in headed mode npx playwright test --headed // 2. Run in debug mode npx playwright test --debug // 3. Use trace viewer await page.screenshot({ path: 'screenshot.png' }); await page.video()?.saveAs('video.webm'); // 4. Add test.step for better reporting test('checkout flow', async ({ page }) => { await test.step('Add item to cart', async () => { await page.goto('/products'); await page.getByRole('button', { name: 'Add to Cart' }).click(); }); await test.step('Proceed to checkout', async () => { await page.goto('/cart'); await page.getByRole('button', { name: 'Checkout' }).click(); }); }); // 5. Inspect page state await page.pause(); // Pauses execution, opens inspector ``` ## Resources - **references/playwright-best-practices.md**: Playwright-specific patterns - **references/cypress-best-practices.md**: Cypress-specific patterns - **references/flaky-test-debugging.md**: Debugging unreliable tests - **assets/e2e-testing-checklist.md**: What to test with E2E - **assets/selector-strategies.md**: Finding reliable selectors - **scripts/test-analyzer.ts**: Analyze test flakiness and duration
šŸ‘0
šŸ‘ļø0
šŸ¤– Auto-discovered
šŸ¤–system prompt•7 months ago

nft-standards

Implement NFT standards (ERC-721, ERC-1155) with proper metadata

coding
⭐1
# NFT Standards Master ERC-721 and ERC-1155 NFT standards, metadata best practices, and advanced NFT features. ## When to Use This Skill - Creating NFT collections (art, gaming, collectibles) - Implementing marketplace functionality - Building on-chain or off-chain metadata - Creating soulbound tokens (non-transferable) - Implementing royalties and revenue sharing - Developing dynamic/evolving NFTs ## ERC-721 (Non-Fungible Token Standard) ```solidity // SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT pragma solidity ^0.8.0; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC721/extensions/ERC721URIStorage.sol"; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC721/extensions/ERC721Enumerable.sol"; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol"; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/Counters.sol"; contract MyNFT is ERC721URIStorage, ERC721Enumerable, Ownable { using Counters for Counters.Counter; Counters.Counter private _tokenIds; uint256 public constant MAX_SUPPLY = 10000; uint256 public constant MINT_PRICE = 0.08 ether; uint256 public constant MAX_PER_MINT = 20; constructor() ERC721("MyNFT", "MNFT") {} function mint(uint256 quantity) external payable { require(quantity > 0 && quantity <= MAX_PER_MINT, "Invalid quantity"); require(_tokenIds.current() + quantity <= MAX_SUPPLY, "Exceeds max supply"); require(msg.value >= MINT_PRICE * quantity, "Insufficient payment"); for (uint256 i = 0; i < quantity; i++) { _tokenIds.increment(); uint256 newTokenId = _tokenIds.current(); _safeMint(msg.sender, newTokenId); _setTokenURI(newTokenId, generateTokenURI(newTokenId)); } } function generateTokenURI(uint256 tokenId) internal pure returns (string memory) { // Return IPFS URI or on-chain metadata return string(abi.encodePacked("ipfs://QmHash/", Strings.toString(tokenId), ".json")); } // Required overrides function _beforeTokenTransfer( address from, address to, uint256 tokenId, uint256 batchSize ) internal override(ERC721, ERC721Enumerable) { super._beforeTokenTransfer(from, to, tokenId, batchSize); } function _burn(uint256 tokenId) internal override(ERC721, ERC721URIStorage) { super._burn(tokenId); } function tokenURI(uint256 tokenId) public view override(ERC721, ERC721URIStorage) returns (string memory) { return super.tokenURI(tokenId); } function supportsInterface(bytes4 interfaceId) public view override(ERC721, ERC721Enumerable) returns (bool) { return super.supportsInterface(interfaceId); } function withdraw() external onlyOwner { payable(owner()).transfer(address(this).balance); } } ``` ## ERC-1155 (Multi-Token Standard) ```solidity // SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT pragma solidity ^0.8.0; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC1155/ERC1155.sol"; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol"; contract GameItems is ERC1155, Ownable { uint256 public constant SWORD = 1; uint256 public constant SHIELD = 2; uint256 public constant POTION = 3; mapping(uint256 => uint256) public tokenSupply; mapping(uint256 => uint256) public maxSupply; constructor() ERC1155("ipfs://QmBaseHash/{id}.json") { maxSupply[SWORD] = 1000; maxSupply[SHIELD] = 500; maxSupply[POTION] = 10000; } function mint( address to, uint256 id, uint256 amount ) external onlyOwner { require(tokenSupply[id] + amount <= maxSupply[id], "Exceeds max supply"); _mint(to, id, amount, ""); tokenSupply[id] += amount; } function mintBatch( address to, uint256[] memory ids, uint256[] memory amounts ) external onlyOwner { for (uint256 i = 0; i < ids.length; i++) { require(tokenSupply[ids[i]] + amounts[i] <= maxSupply[ids[i]], "Exceeds max supply"); tokenSupply[ids[i]] += amounts[i]; } _mintBatch(to, ids, amounts, ""); } function burn( address from, uint256 id, uint256 amount ) external { require(from == msg.sender || isApprovedForAll(from, msg.sender), "Not authorized"); _burn(from, id, amount); tokenSupply[id] -= amount; } } ``` ## Metadata Standards ### Off-Chain Metadata (IPFS) ```json { "name": "NFT #1", "description": "Description of the NFT", "image": "ipfs://QmImageHash", "attributes": [ { "trait_type": "Background", "value": "Blue" }, { "trait_type": "Rarity", "value": "Legendary" }, { "trait_type": "Power", "value": 95, "display_type": "number", "max_value": 100 } ] } ``` ### On-Chain Metadata ```solidity contract OnChainNFT is ERC721 { struct Traits { uint8 background; uint8 body; uint8 head; uint8 rarity; } mapping(uint256 => Traits) public tokenTraits; function tokenURI(uint256 tokenId) public view override returns (string memory) { Traits memory traits = tokenTraits[tokenId]; string memory json = Base64.encode( bytes( string( abi.encodePacked( '{"name": "NFT #', Strings.toString(tokenId), '",', '"description": "On-chain NFT",', '"image": "data:image/svg+xml;base64,', generateSVG(traits), '",', '"attributes": [', '{"trait_type": "Background", "value": "', Strings.toString(traits.background), '"},', '{"trait_type": "Rarity", "value": "', getRarityName(traits.rarity), '"}', ']}' ) ) ) ); return string(abi.encodePacked("data:application/json;base64,", json)); } function generateSVG(Traits memory traits) internal pure returns (string memory) { // Generate SVG based on traits return "..."; } } ``` ## Royalties (EIP-2981) ```solidity import "@openzeppelin/contracts/interfaces/IERC2981.sol"; contract NFTWithRoyalties is ERC721, IERC2981 { address public royaltyRecipient; uint96 public royaltyFee = 500; // 5% constructor() ERC721("Royalty NFT", "RNFT") { royaltyRecipient = msg.sender; } function royaltyInfo(uint256 tokenId, uint256 salePrice) external view override returns (address receiver, uint256 royaltyAmount) { return (royaltyRecipient, (salePrice * royaltyFee) / 10000); } function setRoyalty(address recipient, uint96 fee) external onlyOwner { require(fee <= 1000, "Royalty fee too high"); // Max 10% royaltyRecipient = recipient; royaltyFee = fee; } function supportsInterface(bytes4 interfaceId) public view override(ERC721, IERC165) returns (bool) { return interfaceId == type(IERC2981).interfaceId || super.supportsInterface(interfaceId); } } ``` ## Soulbound Tokens (Non-Transferable) ```solidity contract SoulboundToken is ERC721 { constructor() ERC721("Soulbound", "SBT") {} function _beforeTokenTransfer( address from, address to, uint256 tokenId, uint256 batchSize ) internal virtual override { require(from == address(0) || to == address(0), "Token is soulbound"); super._beforeTokenTransfer(from, to, tokenId, batchSize); } function mint(address to) external { uint256 tokenId = totalSupply() + 1; _safeMint(to, tokenId); } // Burn is allowed (user can destroy their SBT) function burn(uint256 tokenId) external { require(ownerOf(tokenId) == msg.sender, "Not token owner"); _burn(tokenId); } } ``` ## Dynamic NFTs ```solidity contract DynamicNFT is ERC721 { struct TokenState { uint256 level; uint256 experience; uint256 lastUpdated; } mapping(uint256 => TokenState) public tokenStates; function gainExperience(uint256 tokenId, uint256 exp) external { require(ownerOf(tokenId) == msg.sender, "Not token owner"); TokenState storage state = tokenStates[tokenId]; state.experience += exp; // Level up logic if (state.experience >= state.level * 100) { state.level++; } state.lastUpdated = block.timestamp; } function tokenURI(uint256 tokenId) public view override returns (string memory) { TokenState memory state = tokenStates[tokenId]; // Generate metadata based on current state return generateMetadata(tokenId, state); } function generateMetadata(uint256 tokenId, TokenState memory state) internal pure returns (string memory) { // Dynamic metadata generation return ""; } } ``` ## Gas-Optimized Minting (ERC721A) ```solidity import "erc721a/contracts/ERC721A.sol"; contract OptimizedNFT is ERC721A { uint256 public constant MAX_SUPPLY = 10000; uint256 public constant MINT_PRICE = 0.05 ether; constructor() ERC721A("Optimized NFT", "ONFT") {} function mint(uint256 quantity) external payable { require(_totalMinted() + quantity <= MAX_SUPPLY, "Exceeds max supply"); require(msg.value >= MINT_PRICE * quantity, "Insufficient payment"); _mint(msg.sender, quantity); } function _baseURI() internal pure override returns (string memory) { return "ipfs://QmBaseHash/"; } } ``` ## Resources - **references/erc721.md**: ERC-721 specification details - **references/erc1155.md**: ERC-1155 multi-token standard - **references/metadata-standards.md**: Metadata best practices - **references/enumeration.md**: Token enumeration patterns - **assets/erc721-contract.sol**: Production ERC-721 template - **assets/erc1155-contract.sol**: Production ERC-1155 template - **assets/metadata-schema.json**: Standard metadata format - **assets/metadata-uploader.py**: IPFS upload utility ## Best Practices 1. **Use OpenZeppelin**: Battle-tested implementations 2. **Pin Metadata**: Use IPFS with pinning service 3. **Implement Royalties**: EIP-2981 for marketplace compatibility 4. **Gas Optimization**: Use ERC721A for batch minting 5. **Reveal Mechanism**: Placeholder → reveal pattern 6. **Enumeration**: Support walletOfOwner for marketplaces 7. **Whitelist**: Merkle trees for efficient whitelisting ## Marketplace Integration - OpenSea: ERC-721/1155, metadata standards - LooksRare: Royalty enforcement - Rarible: Protocol fees, lazy minting - Blur: Gas-optimized trading
šŸ‘0
šŸ‘ļø0
šŸ¤– Auto-discovered
šŸ¤–system prompt•7 months ago

changelog-automation

Automate changelog generation from commits, PRs, and releases

coding
⭐1
# Changelog Automation Patterns and tools for automating changelog generation, release notes, and version management following industry standards. ## When to Use This Skill - Setting up automated changelog generation - Implementing Conventional Commits - Creating release note workflows - Standardizing commit message formats - Generating GitHub/GitLab release notes - Managing semantic versioning ## Core Concepts ### 1. Keep a Changelog Format ```markdown # Changelog All notable changes to this project will be documented in this file. The format is based on [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/en/1.1.0/), and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0.html). ## [Unreleased] ### Added - New feature X ## [1.2.0] - 2024-01-15 ### Added - User profile avatars - Dark mode support ### Changed - Improved loading performance by 40% ### Deprecated - Old authentication API (use v2) ### Removed - Legacy payment gateway ### Fixed - Login timeout issue (#123) ### Security - Updated dependencies for CVE-2024-1234 [Unreleased]: https://github.com/user/repo/compare/v1.2.0...HEAD [1.2.0]: https://github.com/user/repo/compare/v1.1.0...v1.2.0 ``` ### 2. Conventional Commits ``` <type>[optional scope]: <description> [optional body] [optional footer(s)] ``` | Type | Description | Changelog Section | | ---------- | ---------------- | ------------------ | | `feat` | New feature | Added | | `fix` | Bug fix | Fixed | | `docs` | Documentation | (usually excluded) | | `style` | Formatting | (usually excluded) | | `refactor` | Code restructure | Changed | | `perf` | Performance | Changed | | `test` | Tests | (usually excluded) | | `chore` | Maintenance | (usually excluded) | | `ci` | CI changes | (usually excluded) | | `build` | Build system | (usually excluded) | | `revert` | Revert commit | Removed | ### 3. Semantic Versioning ``` MAJOR.MINOR.PATCH MAJOR: Breaking changes (feat! or BREAKING CHANGE) MINOR: New features (feat) PATCH: Bug fixes (fix) ``` ## Implementation ### Method 1: Conventional Changelog (Node.js) ```bash # Install tools npm install -D @commitlint/cli @commitlint/config-conventional npm install -D husky npm install -D standard-version # or npm install -D semantic-release # Setup commitlint cat > commitlint.config.js << 'EOF' module.exports = { extends: ['@commitlint/config-conventional'], rules: { 'type-enum': [ 2, 'always', [ 'feat', 'fix', 'docs', 'style', 'refactor', 'perf', 'test', 'chore', 'ci', 'build', 'revert', ], ], 'subject-case': [2, 'never', ['start-case', 'pascal-case', 'upper-case']], 'subject-max-length': [2, 'always', 72], }, }; EOF # Setup husky npx husky init echo "npx --no -- commitlint --edit \$1" > .husky/commit-msg ``` ### Method 2: standard-version Configuration ```javascript // .versionrc.js module.exports = { types: [ { type: "feat", section: "Features" }, { type: "fix", section: "Bug Fixes" }, { type: "perf", section: "Performance Improvements" }, { type: "revert", section: "Reverts" }, { type: "docs", section: "Documentation", hidden: true }, { type: "style", section: "Styles", hidden: true }, { type: "chore", section: "Miscellaneous", hidden: true }, { type: "refactor", section: "Code Refactoring", hidden: true }, { type: "test", section: "Tests", hidden: true }, { type: "build", section: "Build System", hidden: true }, { type: "ci", section: "CI/CD", hidden: true }, ], commitUrlFormat: "{{host}}/{{owner}}/{{repository}}/commit/{{hash}}", compareUrlFormat: "{{host}}/{{owner}}/{{repository}}/compare/{{previousTag}}...{{currentTag}}", issueUrlFormat: "{{host}}/{{owner}}/{{repository}}/issues/{{id}}", userUrlFormat: "{{host}}/{{user}}", releaseCommitMessageFormat: "chore(release): {{currentTag}}", scripts: { prebump: 'echo "Running prebump"', postbump: 'echo "Running postbump"', prechangelog: 'echo "Running prechangelog"', postchangelog: 'echo "Running postchangelog"', }, }; ``` ```json // package.json scripts { "scripts": { "release": "standard-version", "release:minor": "standard-version --release-as minor", "release:major": "standard-version --release-as major", "release:patch": "standard-version --release-as patch", "release:dry": "standard-version --dry-run" } } ``` ### Method 3: semantic-release (Full Automation) ```javascript // release.config.js module.exports = { branches: [ "main", { name: "beta", prerelease: true }, { name: "alpha", prerelease: true }, ], plugins: [ "@semantic-release/commit-analyzer", "@semantic-release/release-notes-generator", [ "@semantic-release/changelog", { changelogFile: "CHANGELOG.md", }, ], [ "@semantic-release/npm", { npmPublish: true, }, ], [ "@semantic-release/github", { assets: ["dist/**/*.js", "dist/**/*.css"], }, ], [ "@semantic-release/git", { assets: ["CHANGELOG.md", "package.json"], message: "chore(release): ${nextRelease.version} [skip ci]\n\n${nextRelease.notes}", }, ], ], }; ``` ### Method 4: GitHub Actions Workflow ```yaml # .github/workflows/release.yml name: Release on: push: branches: [main] workflow_dispatch: inputs: release_type: description: "Release type" required: true default: "patch" type: choice options: - patch - minor - major permissions: contents: write pull-requests: write jobs: release: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 with: fetch-depth: 0 token: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} - uses: actions/setup-node@v4 with: node-version: "20" cache: "npm" - run: npm ci - name: Configure Git run: | git config user.name "github-actions[bot]" git config user.email "github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com" - name: Run semantic-release env: GITHUB_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }} NPM_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.NPM_TOKEN }} run: npx semantic-release # Alternative: manual release with standard-version manual-release: if: github.event_name == 'workflow_dispatch' runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 with: fetch-depth: 0 - uses: actions/setup-node@v4 with: node-version: "20" - run: npm ci - name: Configure Git run: | git config user.name "github-actions[bot]" git config user.email "github-actions[bot]@users.noreply.github.com" - name: Bump version and generate changelog run: npx standard-version --release-as ${{ inputs.release_type }} - name: Push changes run: git push --follow-tags origin main - name: Create GitHub Release uses: softprops/action-gh-release@v1 with: tag_name: ${{ steps.version.outputs.tag }} body_path: RELEASE_NOTES.md generate_release_notes: true ``` ### Method 5: git-cliff (Rust-based, Fast) ```toml # cliff.toml [changelog] header = """ # Changelog All notable changes to this project will be documented in this file. """ body = """ {% if version %}\ ## [{{ version | trim_start_matches(pat="v") }}] - {{ timestamp | date(format="%Y-%m-%d") }} {% else %}\ ## [Unreleased] {% endif %}\ {% for group, commits in commits | group_by(attribute="group") %} ### {{ group | upper_first }} {% for commit in commits %} - {% if commit.scope %}**{{ commit.scope }}:** {% endif %}\ {{ commit.message | upper_first }}\ {% if commit.github.pr_number %} ([#{{ commit.github.pr_number }}](https://github.com/owner/repo/pull/{{ commit.github.pr_number }})){% endif %}\ {% endfor %} {% endfor %} """ footer = """ {% for release in releases -%} {% if release.version -%} {% if release.previous.version -%} [{{ release.version | trim_start_matches(pat="v") }}]: \ https://github.com/owner/repo/compare/{{ release.previous.version }}...{{ release.version }} {% endif -%} {% else -%} [unreleased]: https://github.com/owner/repo/compare/{{ release.previous.version }}...HEAD {% endif -%} {% endfor %} """ trim = true [git] conventional_commits = true filter_unconventional = true split_commits = false commit_parsers = [ { message = "^feat", group = "Features" }, { message = "^fix", group = "Bug Fixes" }, { message = "^doc", group = "Documentation" }, { message = "^perf", group = "Performance" }, { message = "^refactor", group = "Refactoring" }, { message = "^style", group = "Styling" }, { message = "^test", group = "Testing" }, { message = "^chore\\(release\\)", skip = true }, { message = "^chore", group = "Miscellaneous" }, ] filter_commits = false tag_pattern = "v[0-9]*" skip_tags = "" ignore_tags = "" topo_order = false sort_commits = "oldest" [github] owner = "owner" repo = "repo" ``` ```bash # Generate changelog git cliff -o CHANGELOG.md # Generate for specific range git cliff v1.0.0..v2.0.0 -o RELEASE_NOTES.md # Preview without writing git cliff --unreleased --dry-run ``` ### Method 6: Python (commitizen) ```toml # pyproject.toml [tool.commitizen] name = "cz_conventional_commits" version = "1.0.0" version_files = [ "pyproject.toml:version", "src/__init__.py:__version__", ] tag_format = "v$version" update_changelog_on_bump = true changelog_incremental = true changelog_start_rev = "v0.1.0" [tool.commitizen.customize] message_template = "{{change_type}}{% if scope %}({{scope}}){% endif %}: {{message}}" schema = "<type>(<scope>): <subject>" schema_pattern = "^(feat|fix|docs|style|refactor|perf|test|chore)(\\(\\w+\\))?:\\s.*" bump_pattern = "^(feat|fix|perf|refactor)" bump_map = {"feat" = "MINOR", "fix" = "PATCH", "perf" = "PATCH", "refactor" = "PATCH"} ``` ```bash # Install pip install commitizen # Create commit interactively cz commit # Bump version and update changelog cz bump --changelog # Check commits cz check --rev-range HEAD~5..HEAD ``` ## Release Notes Templates ### GitHub Release Template ```markdown ## What's Changed ### šŸš€ Features {{ range .Features }} - {{ .Title }} by @{{ .Author }} in #{{ .PR }} {{ end }} ### šŸ› Bug Fixes {{ range .Fixes }} - {{ .Title }} by @{{ .Author }} in #{{ .PR }} {{ end }} ### šŸ“š Documentation {{ range .Docs }} - {{ .Title }} by @{{ .Author }} in #{{ .PR }} {{ end }} ### šŸ”§ Maintenance {{ range .Chores }} - {{ .Title }} by @{{ .Author }} in #{{ .PR }} {{ end }} ## New Contributors {{ range .NewContributors }} - @{{ .Username }} made their first contribution in #{{ .PR }} {{ end }} **Full Changelog**: https://github.com/owner/repo/compare/v{{ .Previous }}...v{{ .Current }} ``` ### Internal Release Notes ```markdown # Release v2.1.0 - January 15, 2024 ## Summary This release introduces dark mode support and improves checkout performance by 40%. It also includes important security updates. ## Highlights ### šŸŒ™ Dark Mode Users can now switch to dark mode from settings. The preference is automatically saved and synced across devices. ### ⚔ Performance - Checkout flow is 40% faster - Reduced bundle size by 15% ## Breaking Changes None in this release. ## Upgrade Guide No special steps required. Standard deployment process applies. ## Known Issues - Dark mode may flicker on initial load (fix scheduled for v2.1.1) ## Dependencies Updated | Package | From | To | Reason | | ------- | ------- | ------- | ------------------------ | | react | 18.2.0 | 18.3.0 | Performance improvements | | lodash | 4.17.20 | 4.17.21 | Security patch | ``` ## Commit Message Examples ```bash # Feature with scope feat(auth): add OAuth2 support for Google login # Bug fix with issue reference fix(checkout): resolve race condition in payment processing Closes #123 # Breaking change feat(api)!: change user endpoint response format BREAKING CHANGE: The user endpoint now returns `userId` instead of `id`. Migration guide: Update all API consumers to use the new field name. # Multiple paragraphs fix(database): handle connection timeouts gracefully Previously, connection timeouts would cause the entire request to fail without retry. This change implements exponential backoff with up to 3 retries before failing. The timeout threshold has been increased from 5s to 10s based on p99 latency analysis. Fixes #456 Reviewed-by: @alice ``` ## Best Practices ### Do's - **Follow Conventional Commits** - Enables automation - **Write clear messages** - Future you will thank you - **Reference issues** - Link commits to tickets - **Use scopes consistently** - Define team conventions - **Automate releases** - Reduce manual errors ### Don'ts - **Don't mix changes** - One logical change per commit - **Don't skip validation** - Use commitlint - **Don't manual edit** - Generated changelogs only - **Don't forget breaking changes** - Mark with `!` or footer - **Don't ignore CI** - Validate commits in pipeline ## Resources - [Keep a Changelog](https://keepachangelog.com/) - [Conventional Commits](https://www.conventionalcommits.org/) - [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/) - [semantic-release](https://semantic-release.gitbook.io/) - [git-cliff](https://git-cliff.org/)
šŸ‘0
šŸ‘ļø0
šŸ¤– Auto-discovered
šŸ¤–system prompt•7 months ago

architecture-decision-records

Write and maintain Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) following

coding
⭐1
# Architecture Decision Records Comprehensive patterns for creating, maintaining, and managing Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) that capture the context and rationale behind significant technical decisions. ## When to Use This Skill - Making significant architectural decisions - Documenting technology choices - Recording design trade-offs - Onboarding new team members - Reviewing historical decisions - Establishing decision-making processes ## Core Concepts ### 1. What is an ADR? An Architecture Decision Record captures: - **Context**: Why we needed to make a decision - **Decision**: What we decided - **Consequences**: What happens as a result ### 2. When to Write an ADR | Write ADR | Skip ADR | | -------------------------- | ---------------------- | | New framework adoption | Minor version upgrades | | Database technology choice | Bug fixes | | API design patterns | Implementation details | | Security architecture | Routine maintenance | | Integration patterns | Configuration changes | ### 3. ADR Lifecycle ``` Proposed → Accepted → Deprecated → Superseded ↓ Rejected ``` ## Templates ### Template 1: Standard ADR (MADR Format) ```markdown # ADR-0001: Use PostgreSQL as Primary Database ## Status Accepted ## Context We need to select a primary database for our new e-commerce platform. The system will handle: - ~10,000 concurrent users - Complex product catalog with hierarchical categories - Transaction processing for orders and payments - Full-text search for products - Geospatial queries for store locator The team has experience with MySQL, PostgreSQL, and MongoDB. We need ACID compliance for financial transactions. ## Decision Drivers - **Must have ACID compliance** for payment processing - **Must support complex queries** for reporting - **Should support full-text search** to reduce infrastructure complexity - **Should have good JSON support** for flexible product attributes - **Team familiarity** reduces onboarding time ## Considered Options ### Option 1: PostgreSQL - **Pros**: ACID compliant, excellent JSON support (JSONB), built-in full-text search, PostGIS for geospatial, team has experience - **Cons**: Slightly more complex replication setup than MySQL ### Option 2: MySQL - **Pros**: Very familiar to team, simple replication, large community - **Cons**: Weaker JSON support, no built-in full-text search (need Elasticsearch), no geospatial without extensions ### Option 3: MongoDB - **Pros**: Flexible schema, native JSON, horizontal scaling - **Cons**: No ACID for multi-document transactions (at decision time), team has limited experience, requires schema design discipline ## Decision We will use **PostgreSQL 15** as our primary database. ## Rationale PostgreSQL provides the best balance of: 1. **ACID compliance** essential for e-commerce transactions 2. **Built-in capabilities** (full-text search, JSONB, PostGIS) reduce infrastructure complexity 3. **Team familiarity** with SQL databases reduces learning curve 4. **Mature ecosystem** with excellent tooling and community support The slight complexity in replication is outweighed by the reduction in additional services (no separate Elasticsearch needed). ## Consequences ### Positive - Single database handles transactions, search, and geospatial queries - Reduced operational complexity (fewer services to manage) - Strong consistency guarantees for financial data - Team can leverage existing SQL expertise ### Negative - Need to learn PostgreSQL-specific features (JSONB, full-text search syntax) - Vertical scaling limits may require read replicas sooner - Some team members need PostgreSQL-specific training ### Risks - Full-text search may not scale as well as dedicated search engines - Mitigation: Design for potential Elasticsearch addition if needed ## Implementation Notes - Use JSONB for flexible product attributes - Implement connection pooling with PgBouncer - Set up streaming replication for read replicas - Use pg_trgm extension for fuzzy search ## Related Decisions - ADR-0002: Caching Strategy (Redis) - complements database choice - ADR-0005: Search Architecture - may supersede if Elasticsearch needed ## References - [PostgreSQL JSON Documentation](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/datatype-json.html) - [PostgreSQL Full Text Search](https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/textsearch.html) - Internal: Performance benchmarks in `/docs/benchmarks/database-comparison.md` ``` ### Template 2: Lightweight ADR ```markdown # ADR-0012: Adopt TypeScript for Frontend Development **Status**: Accepted **Date**: 2024-01-15 **Deciders**: @alice, @bob, @charlie ## Context Our React codebase has grown to 50+ components with increasing bug reports related to prop type mismatches and undefined errors. PropTypes provide runtime-only checking. ## Decision Adopt TypeScript for all new frontend code. Migrate existing code incrementally. ## Consequences **Good**: Catch type errors at compile time, better IDE support, self-documenting code. **Bad**: Learning curve for team, initial slowdown, build complexity increase. **Mitigations**: TypeScript training sessions, allow gradual adoption with `allowJs: true`. ``` ### Template 3: Y-Statement Format ```markdown # ADR-0015: API Gateway Selection In the context of **building a microservices architecture**, facing **the need for centralized API management, authentication, and rate limiting**, we decided for **Kong Gateway** and against **AWS API Gateway and custom Nginx solution**, to achieve **vendor independence, plugin extensibility, and team familiarity with Lua**, accepting that **we need to manage Kong infrastructure ourselves**. ``` ### Template 4: ADR for Deprecation ```markdown # ADR-0020: Deprecate MongoDB in Favor of PostgreSQL ## Status Accepted (Supersedes ADR-0003) ## Context ADR-0003 (2021) chose MongoDB for user profile storage due to schema flexibility needs. Since then: - MongoDB's multi-document transactions remain problematic for our use case - Our schema has stabilized and rarely changes - We now have PostgreSQL expertise from other services - Maintaining two databases increases operational burden ## Decision Deprecate MongoDB and migrate user profiles to PostgreSQL. ## Migration Plan 1. **Phase 1** (Week 1-2): Create PostgreSQL schema, dual-write enabled 2. **Phase 2** (Week 3-4): Backfill historical data, validate consistency 3. **Phase 3** (Week 5): Switch reads to PostgreSQL, monitor 4. **Phase 4** (Week 6): Remove MongoDB writes, decommission ## Consequences ### Positive - Single database technology reduces operational complexity - ACID transactions for user data - Team can focus PostgreSQL expertise ### Negative - Migration effort (~4 weeks) - Risk of data issues during migration - Lose some schema flexibility ## Lessons Learned Document from ADR-0003 experience: - Schema flexibility benefits were overestimated - Operational cost of multiple databases was underestimated - Consider long-term maintenance in technology decisions ``` ### Template 5: Request for Comments (RFC) Style ```markdown # RFC-0025: Adopt Event Sourcing for Order Management ## Summary Propose adopting event sourcing pattern for the order management domain to improve auditability, enable temporal queries, and support business analytics. ## Motivation Current challenges: 1. Audit requirements need complete order history 2. "What was the order state at time X?" queries are impossible 3. Analytics team needs event stream for real-time dashboards 4. Order state reconstruction for customer support is manual ## Detailed Design ### Event Store ``` OrderCreated { orderId, customerId, items[], timestamp } OrderItemAdded { orderId, item, timestamp } OrderItemRemoved { orderId, itemId, timestamp } PaymentReceived { orderId, amount, paymentId, timestamp } OrderShipped { orderId, trackingNumber, timestamp } ``` ### Projections - **CurrentOrderState**: Materialized view for queries - **OrderHistory**: Complete timeline for audit - **DailyOrderMetrics**: Analytics aggregation ### Technology - Event Store: EventStoreDB (purpose-built, handles projections) - Alternative considered: Kafka + custom projection service ## Drawbacks - Learning curve for team - Increased complexity vs. CRUD - Need to design events carefully (immutable once stored) - Storage growth (events never deleted) ## Alternatives 1. **Audit tables**: Simpler but doesn't enable temporal queries 2. **CDC from existing DB**: Complex, doesn't change data model 3. **Hybrid**: Event source only for order state changes ## Unresolved Questions - [ ] Event schema versioning strategy - [ ] Retention policy for events - [ ] Snapshot frequency for performance ## Implementation Plan 1. Prototype with single order type (2 weeks) 2. Team training on event sourcing (1 week) 3. Full implementation and migration (4 weeks) 4. Monitoring and optimization (ongoing) ## References - [Event Sourcing by Martin Fowler](https://martinfowler.com/eaaDev/EventSourcing.html) - [EventStoreDB Documentation](https://www.eventstore.com/docs) ``` ## ADR Management ### Directory Structure ``` docs/ ā”œā”€ā”€ adr/ │ ā”œā”€ā”€ README.md # Index and guidelines │ ā”œā”€ā”€ template.md # Team's ADR template │ ā”œā”€ā”€ 0001-use-postgresql.md │ ā”œā”€ā”€ 0002-caching-strategy.md │ ā”œā”€ā”€ 0003-mongodb-user-profiles.md # [DEPRECATED] │ └── 0020-deprecate-mongodb.md # Supersedes 0003 ``` ### ADR Index (README.md) ```markdown # Architecture Decision Records This directory contains Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) for [Project Name]. ## Index | ADR | Title | Status | Date | | ------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------- | ---------- | ---------- | | [0001](0001-use-postgresql.md) | Use PostgreSQL as Primary Database | Accepted | 2024-01-10 | | [0002](0002-caching-strategy.md) | Caching Strategy with Redis | Accepted | 2024-01-12 | | [0003](0003-mongodb-user-profiles.md) | MongoDB for User Profiles | Deprecated | 2023-06-15 | | [0020](0020-deprecate-mongodb.md) | Deprecate MongoDB | Accepted | 2024-01-15 | ## Creating a New ADR 1. Copy `template.md` to `NNNN-title-with-dashes.md` 2. Fill in the template 3. Submit PR for review 4. Update this index after approval ## ADR Status - **Proposed**: Under discussion - **Accepted**: Decision made, implementing - **Deprecated**: No longer relevant - **Superseded**: Replaced by another ADR - **Rejected**: Considered but not adopted ``` ### Automation (adr-tools) ```bash # Install adr-tools brew install adr-tools # Initialize ADR directory adr init docs/adr # Create new ADR adr new "Use PostgreSQL as Primary Database" # Supersede an ADR adr new -s 3 "Deprecate MongoDB in Favor of PostgreSQL" # Generate table of contents adr generate toc > docs/adr/README.md # Link related ADRs adr link 2 "Complements" 1 "Is complemented by" ``` ## Review Process ```markdown ## ADR Review Checklist ### Before Submission - [ ] Context clearly explains the problem - [ ] All viable options considered - [ ] Pros/cons balanced and honest - [ ] Consequences (positive and negative) documented - [ ] Related ADRs linked ### During Review - [ ] At least 2 senior engineers reviewed - [ ] Affected teams consulted - [ ] Security implications considered - [ ] Cost implications documented - [ ] Reversibility assessed ### After Acceptance - [ ] ADR index updated - [ ] Team notified - [ ] Implementation tickets created - [ ] Related documentation updated ``` ## Best Practices ### Do's - **Write ADRs early** - Before implementation starts - **Keep them short** - 1-2 pages maximum - **Be honest about trade-offs** - Include real cons - **Link related decisions** - Build decision graph - **Update status** - Deprecate when superseded ### Don'ts - **Don't change accepted ADRs** - Write new ones to supersede - **Don't skip context** - Future readers need background - **Don't hide failures** - Rejected decisions are valuable - **Don't be vague** - Specific decisions, specific consequences - **Don't forget implementation** - ADR without action is waste ## Resources - [Documenting Architecture Decisions (Michael Nygard)](https://cognitect.com/blog/2011/11/15/documenting-architecture-decisions) - [MADR Template](https://adr.github.io/madr/) - [ADR GitHub Organization](https://adr.github.io/) - [adr-tools](https://github.com/npryce/adr-tools)
šŸ‘0
šŸ‘ļø0
šŸ¤– Auto-discovered
šŸ¤–system prompt•7 months ago

mtls-configuration

Configure mutual TLS (mTLS) for zero-trust service-to-service

architecture
⭐1
# mTLS Configuration Comprehensive guide to implementing mutual TLS for zero-trust service mesh communication. ## When to Use This Skill - Implementing zero-trust networking - Securing service-to-service communication - Certificate rotation and management - Debugging TLS handshake issues - Compliance requirements (PCI-DSS, HIPAA) - Multi-cluster secure communication ## Core Concepts ### 1. mTLS Flow ``` ā”Œā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā” ā”Œā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā” │ Service │ │ Service │ │ A │ │ B │ ā””ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”¬ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”˜ ā””ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”¬ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”˜ │ │ ā”Œā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”“ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā” TLS Handshake ā”Œā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”“ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā” │ Proxy │◄───────────────────────────►│ Proxy │ │(Sidecar)│ 1. ClientHello │(Sidecar)│ │ │ 2. ServerHello + Cert │ │ │ │ 3. Client Cert │ │ │ │ 4. Verify Both Certs │ │ │ │ 5. Encrypted Channel │ │ ā””ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”˜ ā””ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”€ā”˜ ``` ### 2. Certificate Hierarchy ``` Root CA (Self-signed, long-lived) │ ā”œā”€ā”€ Intermediate CA (Cluster-level) │ │ │ ā”œā”€ā”€ Workload Cert (Service A) │ └── Workload Cert (Service B) │ └── Intermediate CA (Multi-cluster) │ └── Cross-cluster certs ``` ## Templates ### Template 1: Istio mTLS (Strict Mode) ```yaml # Enable strict mTLS mesh-wide apiVersion: security.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: PeerAuthentication metadata: name: default namespace: istio-system spec: mtls: mode: STRICT --- # Namespace-level override (permissive for migration) apiVersion: security.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: PeerAuthentication metadata: name: default namespace: legacy-namespace spec: mtls: mode: PERMISSIVE --- # Workload-specific policy apiVersion: security.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: PeerAuthentication metadata: name: payment-service namespace: production spec: selector: matchLabels: app: payment-service mtls: mode: STRICT portLevelMtls: 8080: mode: STRICT 9090: mode: DISABLE # Metrics port, no mTLS ``` ### Template 2: Istio Destination Rule for mTLS ```yaml apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: DestinationRule metadata: name: default namespace: istio-system spec: host: "*.local" trafficPolicy: tls: mode: ISTIO_MUTUAL --- # TLS to external service apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: DestinationRule metadata: name: external-api spec: host: api.external.com trafficPolicy: tls: mode: SIMPLE caCertificates: /etc/certs/external-ca.pem --- # Mutual TLS to external service apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: DestinationRule metadata: name: partner-api spec: host: api.partner.com trafficPolicy: tls: mode: MUTUAL clientCertificate: /etc/certs/client.pem privateKey: /etc/certs/client-key.pem caCertificates: /etc/certs/partner-ca.pem ``` ### Template 3: Cert-Manager with Istio ```yaml # Install cert-manager issuer for Istio apiVersion: cert-manager.io/v1 kind: ClusterIssuer metadata: name: istio-ca spec: ca: secretName: istio-ca-secret --- # Create Istio CA secret apiVersion: v1 kind: Secret metadata: name: istio-ca-secret namespace: cert-manager type: kubernetes.io/tls data: tls.crt: <base64-encoded-ca-cert> tls.key: <base64-encoded-ca-key> --- # Certificate for workload apiVersion: cert-manager.io/v1 kind: Certificate metadata: name: my-service-cert namespace: my-namespace spec: secretName: my-service-tls duration: 24h renewBefore: 8h issuerRef: name: istio-ca kind: ClusterIssuer commonName: my-service.my-namespace.svc.cluster.local dnsNames: - my-service - my-service.my-namespace - my-service.my-namespace.svc - my-service.my-namespace.svc.cluster.local usages: - server auth - client auth ``` ### Template 4: SPIFFE/SPIRE Integration ```yaml # SPIRE Server configuration apiVersion: v1 kind: ConfigMap metadata: name: spire-server namespace: spire data: server.conf: | server { bind_address = "0.0.0.0" bind_port = "8081" trust_domain = "example.org" data_dir = "/run/spire/data" log_level = "INFO" ca_ttl = "168h" default_x509_svid_ttl = "1h" } plugins { DataStore "sql" { plugin_data { database_type = "sqlite3" connection_string = "/run/spire/data/datastore.sqlite3" } } NodeAttestor "k8s_psat" { plugin_data { clusters = { "demo-cluster" = { service_account_allow_list = ["spire:spire-agent"] } } } } KeyManager "memory" { plugin_data {} } UpstreamAuthority "disk" { plugin_data { key_file_path = "/run/spire/secrets/bootstrap.key" cert_file_path = "/run/spire/secrets/bootstrap.crt" } } } --- # SPIRE Agent DaemonSet (abbreviated) apiVersion: apps/v1 kind: DaemonSet metadata: name: spire-agent namespace: spire spec: selector: matchLabels: app: spire-agent template: spec: containers: - name: spire-agent image: ghcr.io/spiffe/spire-agent:1.8.0 volumeMounts: - name: spire-agent-socket mountPath: /run/spire/sockets volumes: - name: spire-agent-socket hostPath: path: /run/spire/sockets type: DirectoryOrCreate ``` ### Template 5: Linkerd mTLS (Automatic) ```yaml # Linkerd enables mTLS automatically # Verify with: # linkerd viz edges deployment -n my-namespace # For external services without mTLS apiVersion: policy.linkerd.io/v1beta1 kind: Server metadata: name: external-api namespace: my-namespace spec: podSelector: matchLabels: app: my-app port: external-api proxyProtocol: HTTP/1 # or TLS for passthrough --- # Skip TLS for specific port apiVersion: v1 kind: Service metadata: name: my-service annotations: config.linkerd.io/skip-outbound-ports: "3306" # MySQL ``` ## Certificate Rotation ```bash # Istio - Check certificate expiry istioctl proxy-config secret deploy/my-app -o json | \ jq '.dynamicActiveSecrets[0].secret.tlsCertificate.certificateChain.inlineBytes' | \ tr -d '"' | base64 -d | openssl x509 -text -noout # Force certificate rotation kubectl rollout restart deployment/my-app # Check Linkerd identity linkerd identity -n my-namespace ``` ## Debugging mTLS Issues ```bash # Istio - Check if mTLS is enabled istioctl authn tls-check my-service.my-namespace.svc.cluster.local # Verify peer authentication kubectl get peerauthentication --all-namespaces # Check destination rules kubectl get destinationrule --all-namespaces # Debug TLS handshake istioctl proxy-config log deploy/my-app --level debug kubectl logs deploy/my-app -c istio-proxy | grep -i tls # Linkerd - Check mTLS status linkerd viz edges deployment -n my-namespace linkerd viz tap deploy/my-app --to deploy/my-backend ``` ## Best Practices ### Do's - **Start with PERMISSIVE** - Migrate gradually to STRICT - **Monitor certificate expiry** - Set up alerts - **Use short-lived certs** - 24h or less for workloads - **Rotate CA periodically** - Plan for CA rotation - **Log TLS errors** - For debugging and audit ### Don'ts - **Don't disable mTLS** - For convenience in production - **Don't ignore cert expiry** - Automate rotation - **Don't use self-signed certs** - Use proper CA hierarchy - **Don't skip verification** - Verify the full chain ## Resources - [Istio Security](https://istio.io/latest/docs/concepts/security/) - [SPIFFE/SPIRE](https://spiffe.io/) - [cert-manager](https://cert-manager.io/) - [Zero Trust Architecture (NIST)](https://www.nist.gov/publications/zero-trust-architecture)
šŸ‘0
šŸ‘ļø0
šŸ¤– Auto-discovered
šŸ¤–system prompt•7 months ago

openapi-spec-generation

Generate and maintain OpenAPI 3.1 specifications from code,

coding
⭐1
# OpenAPI Spec Generation Comprehensive patterns for creating, maintaining, and validating OpenAPI 3.1 specifications for RESTful APIs. ## When to Use This Skill - Creating API documentation from scratch - Generating OpenAPI specs from existing code - Designing API contracts (design-first approach) - Validating API implementations against specs - Generating client SDKs from specs - Setting up API documentation portals ## Core Concepts ### 1. OpenAPI 3.1 Structure ```yaml openapi: 3.1.0 info: title: API Title version: 1.0.0 servers: - url: https://api.example.com/v1 paths: /resources: get: ... components: schemas: ... securitySchemes: ... ``` ### 2. Design Approaches | Approach | Description | Best For | | ---------------- | ---------------------------- | ------------------- | | **Design-First** | Write spec before code | New APIs, contracts | | **Code-First** | Generate spec from code | Existing APIs | | **Hybrid** | Annotate code, generate spec | Evolving APIs | ## Templates ### Template 1: Complete API Specification ```yaml openapi: 3.1.0 info: title: User Management API description: | API for managing users and their profiles. ## Authentication All endpoints require Bearer token authentication. ## Rate Limiting - 1000 requests per minute for standard tier - 10000 requests per minute for enterprise tier version: 2.0.0 contact: name: API Support email: api-support@example.com url: https://docs.example.com license: name: MIT url: https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT servers: - url: https://api.example.com/v2 description: Production - url: https://staging-api.example.com/v2 description: Staging - url: http://localhost:3000/v2 description: Local development tags: - name: Users description: User management operations - name: Profiles description: User profile operations - name: Admin description: Administrative operations paths: /users: get: operationId: listUsers summary: List all users description: Returns a paginated list of users with optional filtering. tags: - Users parameters: - $ref: "#/components/parameters/PageParam" - $ref: "#/components/parameters/LimitParam" - name: status in: query description: Filter by user status schema: $ref: "#/components/schemas/UserStatus" - name: search in: query description: Search by name or email schema: type: string minLength: 2 maxLength: 100 responses: "200": description: Successful response content: application/json: schema: $ref: "#/components/schemas/UserListResponse" examples: default: $ref: "#/components/examples/UserListExample" "400": $ref: "#/components/responses/BadRequest" "401": $ref: "#/components/responses/Unauthorized" "429": $ref: "#/components/responses/RateLimited" security: - bearerAuth: [] post: operationId: createUser summary: Create a new user description: Creates a new user account and sends welcome email. tags: - Users requestBody: required: true content: application/json: schema: $ref: "#/components/schemas/CreateUserRequest" examples: standard: summary: Standard user value: email: user@example.com name: John Doe role: user admin: summary: Admin user value: email: admin@example.com name: Admin User role: admin responses: "201": description: User created successfully content: application/json: schema: $ref: "#/components/schemas/User" headers: Location: description: URL of created user schema: type: string format: uri "400": $ref: "#/components/responses/BadRequest" "409": description: Email already exists content: application/json: schema: $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" security: - bearerAuth: [] /users/{userId}: parameters: - $ref: "#/components/parameters/UserIdParam" get: operationId: getUser summary: Get user by ID tags: - Users responses: "200": description: Successful response content: application/json: schema: $ref: "#/components/schemas/User" "404": $ref: "#/components/responses/NotFound" security: - bearerAuth: [] patch: operationId: updateUser summary: Update user tags: - Users requestBody: required: true content: application/json: schema: $ref: "#/components/schemas/UpdateUserRequest" responses: "200": description: User updated content: application/json: schema: $ref: "#/components/schemas/User" "400": $ref: "#/components/responses/BadRequest" "404": $ref: "#/components/responses/NotFound" security: - bearerAuth: [] delete: operationId: deleteUser summary: Delete user tags: - Users - Admin responses: "204": description: User deleted "404": $ref: "#/components/responses/NotFound" security: - bearerAuth: [] - apiKey: [] components: schemas: User: type: object required: - id - email - name - status - createdAt properties: id: type: string format: uuid readOnly: true description: Unique user identifier email: type: string format: email description: User email address name: type: string minLength: 1 maxLength: 100 description: User display name status: $ref: "#/components/schemas/UserStatus" role: type: string enum: [user, moderator, admin] default: user avatar: type: string format: uri nullable: true metadata: type: object additionalProperties: true description: Custom metadata createdAt: type: string format: date-time readOnly: true updatedAt: type: string format: date-time readOnly: true UserStatus: type: string enum: [active, inactive, suspended, pending] description: User account status CreateUserRequest: type: object required: - email - name properties: email: type: string format: email name: type: string minLength: 1 maxLength: 100 role: type: string enum: [user, moderator, admin] default: user metadata: type: object additionalProperties: true UpdateUserRequest: type: object minProperties: 1 properties: name: type: string minLength: 1 maxLength: 100 status: $ref: "#/components/schemas/UserStatus" role: type: string enum: [user, moderator, admin] metadata: type: object additionalProperties: true UserListResponse: type: object required: - data - pagination properties: data: type: array items: $ref: "#/components/schemas/User" pagination: $ref: "#/components/schemas/Pagination" Pagination: type: object required: - page - limit - total - totalPages properties: page: type: integer minimum: 1 limit: type: integer minimum: 1 maximum: 100 total: type: integer minimum: 0 totalPages: type: integer minimum: 0 hasNext: type: boolean hasPrev: type: boolean Error: type: object required: - code - message properties: code: type: string description: Error code for programmatic handling message: type: string description: Human-readable error message details: type: array items: type: object properties: field: type: string message: type: string requestId: type: string description: Request ID for support parameters: UserIdParam: name: userId in: path required: true description: User ID schema: type: string format: uuid PageParam: name: page in: query description: Page number (1-based) schema: type: integer minimum: 1 default: 1 LimitParam: name: limit in: query description: Items per page schema: type: integer minimum: 1 maximum: 100 default: 20 responses: BadRequest: description: Invalid request content: application/json: schema: $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" example: code: VALIDATION_ERROR message: Invalid request parameters details: - field: email message: Must be a valid email address Unauthorized: description: Authentication required content: application/json: schema: $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" example: code: UNAUTHORIZED message: Authentication required NotFound: description: Resource not found content: application/json: schema: $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" example: code: NOT_FOUND message: User not found RateLimited: description: Too many requests content: application/json: schema: $ref: "#/components/schemas/Error" headers: Retry-After: description: Seconds until rate limit resets schema: type: integer X-RateLimit-Limit: description: Request limit per window schema: type: integer X-RateLimit-Remaining: description: Remaining requests in window schema: type: integer examples: UserListExample: value: data: - id: "550e8400-e29b-41d4-a716-446655440000" email: "john@example.com" name: "John Doe" status: "active" role: "user" createdAt: "2024-01-15T10:30:00Z" pagination: page: 1 limit: 20 total: 1 totalPages: 1 hasNext: false hasPrev: false securitySchemes: bearerAuth: type: http scheme: bearer bearerFormat: JWT description: JWT token from /auth/login apiKey: type: apiKey in: header name: X-API-Key description: API key for service-to-service calls security: - bearerAuth: [] ``` ### Template 2: Code-First Generation (Python/FastAPI) ```python # FastAPI with automatic OpenAPI generation from fastapi import FastAPI, HTTPException, Query, Path, Depends from pydantic import BaseModel, Field, EmailStr from typing import Optional, List from datetime import datetime from uuid import UUID from enum import Enum app = FastAPI( title="User Management API", description="API for managing users and profiles", version="2.0.0", openapi_tags=[ {"name": "Users", "description": "User operations"}, {"name": "Profiles", "description": "Profile operations"}, ], servers=[ {"url": "https://api.example.com/v2", "description": "Production"}, {"url": "http://localhost:8000", "description": "Development"}, ], ) # Enums class UserStatus(str, Enum): active = "active" inactive = "inactive" suspended = "suspended" pending = "pending" class UserRole(str, Enum): user = "user" moderator = "moderator" admin = "admin" # Models class UserBase(BaseModel): email: EmailStr = Field(..., description="User email address") name: str = Field(..., min_length=1, max_length=100, description="Display name") class UserCreate(UserBase): role: UserRole = Field(default=UserRole.user) metadata: Optional[dict] = Field(default=None, description="Custom metadata") model_config = { "json_schema_extra": { "examples": [ { "email": "user@example.com", "name": "John Doe", "role": "user" } ] } } class UserUpdate(BaseModel): name: Optional[str] = Field(None, min_length=1, max_length=100) status: Optional[UserStatus] = None role: Optional[UserRole] = None metadata: Optional[dict] = None class User(UserBase): id: UUID = Field(..., description="Unique identifier") status: UserStatus role: UserRole avatar: Optional[str] = Field(None, description="Avatar URL") metadata: Optional[dict] = None created_at: datetime = Field(..., alias="createdAt") updated_at: Optional[datetime] = Field(None, alias="updatedAt") model_config = {"populate_by_name": True} class Pagination(BaseModel): page: int = Field(..., ge=1) limit: int = Field(..., ge=1, le=100) total: int = Field(..., ge=0) total_pages: int = Field(..., ge=0, alias="totalPages") has_next: bool = Field(..., alias="hasNext") has_prev: bool = Field(..., alias="hasPrev") class UserListResponse(BaseModel): data: List[User] pagination: Pagination class ErrorDetail(BaseModel): field: str message: str class ErrorResponse(BaseModel): code: str = Field(..., description="Error code") message: str = Field(..., description="Error message") details: Optional[List[ErrorDetail]] = None request_id: Optional[str] = Field(None, alias="requestId") # Endpoints @app.get( "/users", response_model=UserListResponse, tags=["Users"], summary="List all users", description="Returns a paginated list of users with optional filtering.", responses={ 400: {"model": ErrorResponse, "description": "Invalid request"}, 401: {"model": ErrorResponse, "description": "Unauthorized"}, }, ) async def list_users( page: int = Query(1, ge=1, description="Page number"), limit: int = Query(20, ge=1, le=100, description="Items per page"), status: Optional[UserStatus] = Query(None, description="Filter by status"), search: Optional[str] = Query(None, min_length=2, max_length=100), ): """ List users with pagination and filtering. - **page**: Page number (1-based) - **limit**: Number of items per page (max 100) - **status**: Filter by user status - **search**: Search by name or email """ # Implementation pass @app.post( "/users", response_model=User, status_code=201, tags=["Users"], summary="Create a new user", responses={ 400: {"model": ErrorResponse}, 409: {"model": ErrorResponse, "description": "Email already exists"}, }, ) async def create_user(user: UserCreate): """Create a new user and send welcome email.""" pass @app.get( "/users/{user_id}", response_model=User, tags=["Users"], summary="Get user by ID", responses={404: {"model": ErrorResponse}}, ) async def get_user( user_id: UUID = Path(..., description="User ID"), ): """Retrieve a specific user by their ID.""" pass @app.patch( "/users/{user_id}", response_model=User, tags=["Users"], summary="Update user", responses={ 400: {"model": ErrorResponse}, 404: {"model": ErrorResponse}, }, ) async def update_user( user_id: UUID = Path(..., description="User ID"), user: UserUpdate = ..., ): """Update user attributes.""" pass @app.delete( "/users/{user_id}", status_code=204, tags=["Users", "Admin"], summary="Delete user", responses={404: {"model": ErrorResponse}}, ) async def delete_user( user_id: UUID = Path(..., description="User ID"), ): """Permanently delete a user.""" pass # Export OpenAPI spec if __name__ == "__main__": import json print(json.dumps(app.openapi(), indent=2)) ``` ### Template 3: Code-First (TypeScript/Express with tsoa) ```typescript // tsoa generates OpenAPI from TypeScript decorators import { Controller, Get, Post, Patch, Delete, Route, Path, Query, Body, Response, SuccessResponse, Tags, Security, Example, } from "tsoa"; // Models interface User { /** Unique identifier */ id: string; /** User email address */ email: string; /** Display name */ name: string; status: UserStatus; role: UserRole; /** Avatar URL */ avatar?: string; /** Custom metadata */ metadata?: Record<string, unknown>; createdAt: Date; updatedAt?: Date; } enum UserStatus { Active = "active", Inactive = "inactive", Suspended = "suspended", Pending = "pending", } enum UserRole { User = "user", Moderator = "moderator", Admin = "admin", } interface CreateUserRequest { email: string; name: string; role?: UserRole; metadata?: Record<string, unknown>; } interface UpdateUserRequest { name?: string; status?: UserStatus; role?: UserRole; metadata?: Record<string, unknown>; } interface Pagination { page: number; limit: number; total: number; totalPages: number; hasNext: boolean; hasPrev: boolean; } interface UserListResponse { data: User[]; pagination: Pagination; } interface ErrorResponse { code: string; message: string; details?: { field: string; message: string }[]; requestId?: string; } @Route("users") @Tags("Users") export class UsersController extends Controller { /** * List all users with pagination and filtering * @param page Page number (1-based) * @param limit Items per page (max 100) * @param status Filter by user status * @param search Search by name or email */
šŸ‘0
šŸ‘ļø0
šŸ¤– Auto-discovered
šŸ¤–system prompt•7 months ago

nx-workspace-patterns

Configure and optimize Nx monorepo workspaces. Use when setting up

coding
⭐1
# Nx Workspace Patterns Production patterns for Nx monorepo management. ## When to Use This Skill - Setting up new Nx workspaces - Configuring project boundaries - Optimizing CI with affected commands - Implementing remote caching - Managing dependencies between projects - Migrating to Nx ## Core Concepts ### 1. Nx Architecture ``` workspace/ ā”œā”€ā”€ apps/ # Deployable applications │ ā”œā”€ā”€ web/ │ └── api/ ā”œā”€ā”€ libs/ # Shared libraries │ ā”œā”€ā”€ shared/ │ │ ā”œā”€ā”€ ui/ │ │ └── utils/ │ └── feature/ │ ā”œā”€ā”€ auth/ │ └── dashboard/ ā”œā”€ā”€ tools/ # Custom executors/generators ā”œā”€ā”€ nx.json # Nx configuration └── workspace.json # Project configuration ``` ### 2. Library Types | Type | Purpose | Example | | --------------- | -------------------------------- | ------------------- | | **feature** | Smart components, business logic | `feature-auth` | | **ui** | Presentational components | `ui-buttons` | | **data-access** | API calls, state management | `data-access-users` | | **util** | Pure functions, helpers | `util-formatting` | | **shell** | App bootstrapping | `shell-web` | ## Templates ### Template 1: nx.json Configuration ```json { "$schema": "./node_modules/nx/schemas/nx-schema.json", "npmScope": "myorg", "affected": { "defaultBase": "main" }, "tasksRunnerOptions": { "default": { "runner": "nx/tasks-runners/default", "options": { "cacheableOperations": [ "build", "lint", "test", "e2e", "build-storybook" ], "parallel": 3 } } }, "targetDefaults": { "build": { "dependsOn": ["^build"], "inputs": ["production", "^production"], "cache": true }, "test": { "inputs": ["default", "^production", "{workspaceRoot}/jest.preset.js"], "cache": true }, "lint": { "inputs": ["default", "{workspaceRoot}/.eslintrc.json"], "cache": true }, "e2e": { "inputs": ["default", "^production"], "cache": true } }, "namedInputs": { "default": ["{projectRoot}/**/*", "sharedGlobals"], "production": [ "default", "!{projectRoot}/**/?(*.)+(spec|test).[jt]s?(x)?(.snap)", "!{projectRoot}/tsconfig.spec.json", "!{projectRoot}/jest.config.[jt]s", "!{projectRoot}/.eslintrc.json" ], "sharedGlobals": [ "{workspaceRoot}/babel.config.json", "{workspaceRoot}/tsconfig.base.json" ] }, "generators": { "@nx/react": { "application": { "style": "css", "linter": "eslint", "bundler": "webpack" }, "library": { "style": "css", "linter": "eslint" }, "component": { "style": "css" } } } } ``` ### Template 2: Project Configuration ```json // apps/web/project.json { "name": "web", "$schema": "../../node_modules/nx/schemas/project-schema.json", "sourceRoot": "apps/web/src", "projectType": "application", "tags": ["type:app", "scope:web"], "targets": { "build": { "executor": "@nx/webpack:webpack", "outputs": ["{options.outputPath}"], "defaultConfiguration": "production", "options": { "compiler": "babel", "outputPath": "dist/apps/web", "index": "apps/web/src/index.html", "main": "apps/web/src/main.tsx", "tsConfig": "apps/web/tsconfig.app.json", "assets": ["apps/web/src/assets"], "styles": ["apps/web/src/styles.css"] }, "configurations": { "development": { "extractLicenses": false, "optimization": false, "sourceMap": true }, "production": { "optimization": true, "outputHashing": "all", "sourceMap": false, "extractLicenses": true } } }, "serve": { "executor": "@nx/webpack:dev-server", "defaultConfiguration": "development", "options": { "buildTarget": "web:build" }, "configurations": { "development": { "buildTarget": "web:build:development" }, "production": { "buildTarget": "web:build:production" } } }, "test": { "executor": "@nx/jest:jest", "outputs": ["{workspaceRoot}/coverage/{projectRoot}"], "options": { "jestConfig": "apps/web/jest.config.ts", "passWithNoTests": true } }, "lint": { "executor": "@nx/eslint:lint", "outputs": ["{options.outputFile}"], "options": { "lintFilePatterns": ["apps/web/**/*.{ts,tsx,js,jsx}"] } } } } ``` ### Template 3: Module Boundary Rules ```json // .eslintrc.json { "root": true, "ignorePatterns": ["**/*"], "plugins": ["@nx"], "overrides": [ { "files": ["*.ts", "*.tsx", "*.js", "*.jsx"], "rules": { "@nx/enforce-module-boundaries": [ "error", { "enforceBuildableLibDependency": true, "allow": [], "depConstraints": [ { "sourceTag": "type:app", "onlyDependOnLibsWithTags": [ "type:feature", "type:ui", "type:data-access", "type:util" ] }, { "sourceTag": "type:feature", "onlyDependOnLibsWithTags": [ "type:ui", "type:data-access", "type:util" ] }, { "sourceTag": "type:ui", "onlyDependOnLibsWithTags": ["type:ui", "type:util"] }, { "sourceTag": "type:data-access", "onlyDependOnLibsWithTags": ["type:data-access", "type:util"] }, { "sourceTag": "type:util", "onlyDependOnLibsWithTags": ["type:util"] }, { "sourceTag": "scope:web", "onlyDependOnLibsWithTags": ["scope:web", "scope:shared"] }, { "sourceTag": "scope:api", "onlyDependOnLibsWithTags": ["scope:api", "scope:shared"] }, { "sourceTag": "scope:shared", "onlyDependOnLibsWithTags": ["scope:shared"] } ] } ] } } ] } ``` ### Template 4: Custom Generator ```typescript // tools/generators/feature-lib/index.ts import { Tree, formatFiles, generateFiles, joinPathFragments, names, readProjectConfiguration, } from "@nx/devkit"; import { libraryGenerator } from "@nx/react"; interface FeatureLibraryGeneratorSchema { name: string; scope: string; directory?: string; } export default async function featureLibraryGenerator( tree: Tree, options: FeatureLibraryGeneratorSchema, ) { const { name, scope, directory } = options; const projectDirectory = directory ? `${directory}/${name}` : `libs/${scope}/feature-${name}`; // Generate base library await libraryGenerator(tree, { name: `feature-${name}`, directory: projectDirectory, tags: `type:feature,scope:${scope}`, style: "css", skipTsConfig: false, skipFormat: true, unitTestRunner: "jest", linter: "eslint", }); // Add custom files const projectConfig = readProjectConfiguration( tree, `${scope}-feature-${name}`, ); const projectNames = names(name); generateFiles( tree, joinPathFragments(__dirname, "files"), projectConfig.sourceRoot, { ...projectNames, scope, tmpl: "", }, ); await formatFiles(tree); } ``` ### Template 5: CI Configuration with Affected ```yaml # .github/workflows/ci.yml name: CI on: push: branches: [main] pull_request: branches: [main] env: NX_CLOUD_ACCESS_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.NX_CLOUD_ACCESS_TOKEN }} jobs: main: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 with: fetch-depth: 0 - uses: actions/setup-node@v4 with: node-version: 20 cache: "npm" - name: Install dependencies run: npm ci - name: Derive SHAs for affected commands uses: nrwl/nx-set-shas@v4 - name: Run affected lint run: npx nx affected -t lint --parallel=3 - name: Run affected test run: npx nx affected -t test --parallel=3 --configuration=ci - name: Run affected build run: npx nx affected -t build --parallel=3 - name: Run affected e2e run: npx nx affected -t e2e --parallel=1 ``` ### Template 6: Remote Caching Setup ```typescript // nx.json with Nx Cloud { "tasksRunnerOptions": { "default": { "runner": "nx-cloud", "options": { "cacheableOperations": ["build", "lint", "test", "e2e"], "accessToken": "your-nx-cloud-token", "parallel": 3, "cacheDirectory": ".nx/cache" } } }, "nxCloudAccessToken": "your-nx-cloud-token" } // Self-hosted cache with S3 { "tasksRunnerOptions": { "default": { "runner": "@nx-aws-cache/nx-aws-cache", "options": { "cacheableOperations": ["build", "lint", "test"], "awsRegion": "us-east-1", "awsBucket": "my-nx-cache-bucket", "awsProfile": "default" } } } } ``` ## Common Commands ```bash # Generate new library nx g @nx/react:lib feature-auth --directory=libs/web --tags=type:feature,scope:web # Run affected tests nx affected -t test --base=main # View dependency graph nx graph # Run specific project nx build web --configuration=production # Reset cache nx reset # Run migrations nx migrate latest nx migrate --run-migrations ``` ## Best Practices ### Do's - **Use tags consistently** - Enforce with module boundaries - **Enable caching early** - Significant CI savings - **Keep libs focused** - Single responsibility - **Use generators** - Ensure consistency - **Document boundaries** - Help new developers ### Don'ts - **Don't create circular deps** - Graph should be acyclic - **Don't skip affected** - Test only what changed - **Don't ignore boundaries** - Tech debt accumulates - **Don't over-granularize** - Balance lib count ## Resources - [Nx Documentation](https://nx.dev/getting-started/intro) - [Module Boundaries](https://nx.dev/core-features/enforce-module-boundaries) - [Nx Cloud](https://nx.app/)
šŸ‘0
šŸ‘ļø0
šŸ¤– Auto-discovered