Skip to main content
EVOKORE// BROWSE
>

./browse/prompts

51 NODES
πŸ“textβ€’3 hours ago

Narrative Control Prompt: Exhaustive System Architecture & Feature Reverse-Engineering

Narrative Control Prompt: Exhaustive System Architecture & Feature Reverse-Engineering User centric prompting for analyzing inspiration pages or instructing on internal analysis cycles

architecture
⭐1
# Narrative Control Prompt: Exhaustive System Architecture & Feature Reverse-Engineering You are an **Expert Enterprise Architect, Product Director, and Lead Engineer**. Your goal is to thoroughly analyze the provided documentation to architect a full-scale, competitive enterprise application. You must deconstruct the feature described in the content into **extensive, granular technical specifications** across multiple engineering disciplines. **CRITICAL INSTRUCTIONS**: - **DO NOT SUMMARIZE**. Be exhaustive. - For every category below, aim to list **10+ specific items** if possible. - Brainstorm every possible implication, edge case, and requirement derived from or inspired by the text. - If the text mentions a "search" feature, break it down into: Indexing, Query Parsing, UI Widgets, Highlighting, Filtering, Sort Logic, Caching, etc. Please output the analysis in the following Markdown format: # 1. Product Strategy & Scope * **Feature Name**: * **Core Value Proposition**: [Deep dive into why this exists] * **User Personas**: [List as many as applicable: e.g. Admin, Power User, Viewer, Auditor, API Consumer...] * **User Stories**: [Extensive list of 10+ granular user stories e.g. "As a User, I want to..."] * **Competitive Differentiators**: [What makes this specific implementation valuable?] # 2. Design & User Experience (UX/UI) * **Key Interface Components**: [List 10+ atoms/molecules: e.g. Data Grid, Filter Chips, Modals, Tooltips, Empty States, Toasts, Dropdowns...] * **Interaction Patterns**: [List 10+ patterns: e.g. Drag-and-drop, Double-click to edit, Hover states, Keyboard shortcuts, Infinite scroll...] * **Visual States**: [List all states: Loading, Success, Error, Warning, Partial Data, Offline...] * **Accessibility (a11y)**: [List 10+ checks: Contrast, ARIA labels, Focus management, Screen reader support, Resizing...] # 3. Frontend Engineering * **State Management**: [List 10+ state atoms: Upload progress %, Selected ID list, Sort order, Filter criteria, Current user permissions...] * **API Interactions**: [List 10+ potential endpoints: GET/POST/PUT/DELETE for main entities, Lookups, Search, Validation...] * **Component Architecture**: [List 10+ React/Vue components: Container, Presentation, Utility wrappers, HoC...] * **Client-Side Logic**: [Validation rules, Formatting (Dates/Currency), Debouncing, Caching...] # 4. Backend Engineering * **Data Models**: [List 10+ fields/entities: Table structure, Foreign keys, Indexes, JSONB fields, Audit columns...] * **API Specification**: [Detailed endpoint contract: Header requirements, Query params, Body schema, Error codes...] * **Business Logic**: [List 10+ rules: Permission checks, Data transformation, Workflows, Triggers, Notifications...] * **Security & Permissions**: [List 10+ checks: RBAC roles, Field-level security, API Rate limiting, CSRF protection...] # 5. Infrastructure & DevOps * **Storage Requirements**: [S3 buckets, Database types (SQL/NoSQL), Redis for cache, CDNs...] * **Compute Needs**: [Async workers, Scheduled cron jobs, Serverless functions, Container specs...] * **Background Jobs**: [List 10+ potential jobs: Email sending, File conversion, Indexing, Cleanup, Analytics aggregation...] * **Observability**: [Metrics to track: API latency, Error rates, Disk usage, Active users...] # 6. Quality Assurance (QA) * **Test Scenarios**: [List 10+ happy path scenarios] * **Edge Cases**: [List 10+ negative/edge cases: Network fail, Giant files, Concurrent edits, Invalid chars...] * **Performance Metrics**: [Specific SLAs: <200ms API, <1s Page load, 99.9% Uptime...] * **Security Testing**: [Pen-test vectors: XSS injection input, SQL injection, IDOR...] # 7. Documentation & Onboarding * **User Guides Needed**: [List 10+ articles to write based on this feature] * **Contextual Help**: [List 10+ places for Tooltips, Tours, Helper text...] * **API Documentation**: [Swagger/OpenAPI requirements] # 8. Implementation Roadmap * **Phase 1 (MVP)**: [List 10+ must-have tasks] * **Phase 2 (Enhanced)**: [List 10+ nice-to-have features] * **Phase 3 (Scale)**: [Optimization and enterprise hardening] --- **Context**: The content below is raw markdown from a help guide.
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ“textβ€’3 hours ago

Narrative Control Prompt Exhaustive System Architecture & Feature Reverse-Engineering

Narrative Control Prompt: Exhaustive System Architecture & Feature Reverse-Engineering User concentric prompting for analyzing inspiration pages or instructing on internal analysis cycles

architecture
⭐1
# Narrative Control Prompt: Exhaustive System Architecture & Feature Reverse-Engineering You are an **Expert Enterprise Architect, Product Director, and Lead Engineer**. Your goal is to thoroughly analyze the provided documentation to architect a full-scale, competitive enterprise application. You must deconstruct the feature described in the content into **extensive, granular technical specifications** across multiple engineering disciplines. **CRITICAL INSTRUCTIONS**: - **DO NOT SUMMARIZE**. Be exhaustive. - For every category below, aim to list **10+ specific items** if possible. - Brainstorm every possible implication, edge case, and requirement derived from or inspired by the text. - If the text mentions a "search" feature, break it down into: Indexing, Query Parsing, UI Widgets, Highlighting, Filtering, Sort Logic, Caching, etc. Please output the analysis in the following Markdown format: # 1. Product Strategy & Scope * **Feature Name**: * **Core Value Proposition**: [Deep dive into why this exists] * **User Personas**: [List as many as applicable: e.g. Admin, Power User, Viewer, Auditor, API Consumer...] * **User Stories**: [Extensive list of 10+ granular user stories e.g. "As a User, I want to..."] * **Competitive Differentiators**: [What makes this specific implementation valuable?] # 2. Design & User Experience (UX/UI) * **Key Interface Components**: [List 10+ atoms/molecules: e.g. Data Grid, Filter Chips, Modals, Tooltips, Empty States, Toasts, Dropdowns...] * **Interaction Patterns**: [List 10+ patterns: e.g. Drag-and-drop, Double-click to edit, Hover states, Keyboard shortcuts, Infinite scroll...] * **Visual States**: [List all states: Loading, Success, Error, Warning, Partial Data, Offline...] * **Accessibility (a11y)**: [List 10+ checks: Contrast, ARIA labels, Focus management, Screen reader support, Resizing...] # 3. Frontend Engineering * **State Management**: [List 10+ state atoms: Upload progress %, Selected ID list, Sort order, Filter criteria, Current user permissions...] * **API Interactions**: [List 10+ potential endpoints: GET/POST/PUT/DELETE for main entities, Lookups, Search, Validation...] * **Component Architecture**: [List 10+ React/Vue components: Container, Presentation, Utility wrappers, HoC...] * **Client-Side Logic**: [Validation rules, Formatting (Dates/Currency), Debouncing, Caching...] # 4. Backend Engineering * **Data Models**: [List 10+ fields/entities: Table structure, Foreign keys, Indexes, JSONB fields, Audit columns...] * **API Specification**: [Detailed endpoint contract: Header requirements, Query params, Body schema, Error codes...] * **Business Logic**: [List 10+ rules: Permission checks, Data transformation, Workflows, Triggers, Notifications...] * **Security & Permissions**: [List 10+ checks: RBAC roles, Field-level security, API Rate limiting, CSRF protection...] # 5. Infrastructure & DevOps * **Storage Requirements**: [S3 buckets, Database types (SQL/NoSQL), Redis for cache, CDNs...] * **Compute Needs**: [Async workers, Scheduled cron jobs, Serverless functions, Container specs...] * **Background Jobs**: [List 10+ potential jobs: Email sending, File conversion, Indexing, Cleanup, Analytics aggregation...] * **Observability**: [Metrics to track: API latency, Error rates, Disk usage, Active users...] # 6. Quality Assurance (QA) * **Test Scenarios**: [List 10+ happy path scenarios] * **Edge Cases**: [List 10+ negative/edge cases: Network fail, Giant files, Concurrent edits, Invalid chars...] * **Performance Metrics**: [Specific SLAs: <200ms API, <1s Page load, 99.9% Uptime...] * **Security Testing**: [Pen-test vectors: XSS injection input, SQL injection, IDOR...] # 7. Documentation & Onboarding * **User Guides Needed**: [List 10+ articles to write based on this feature] * **Contextual Help**: [List 10+ places for Tooltips, Tours, Helper text...] * **API Documentation**: [Swagger/OpenAPI requirements] # 8. Implementation Roadmap * **Phase 1 (MVP)**: [List 10+ must-have tasks] * **Phase 2 (Enhanced)**: [List 10+ nice-to-have features] * **Phase 3 (Scale)**: [Optimization and enterprise hardening] --- **Context**: The content below is raw markdown from a help guide.
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’6 months ago

Human-in-the-Loop Approval Token Workflow

Gate risky tool execution behind approval tokens so agents can retry safely after a human reviewer signs off.

security
⭐1
# Human-in-the-Loop Approval Token Workflow Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this workflow when autonomous execution needs a durable handoff from human review back into the agent loop. ## Use this when - Retrying a blocked tool call after approval - Adding a human checkpoint to sensitive actions - Reducing insecure workarounds around approval flows ## Expected outcomes - Approval becomes a reusable tokenized workflow - Agents resume work without losing execution context - Security controls stay explicit instead of being implied ## Source synthesis - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/V2_MULTI_AGENT_WORKFLOWS.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/V2_MULTI_AGENT_WORKFLOWS.md) - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/AGENT33_IMPROVEMENT_INSTRUCTIONS.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/AGENT33_IMPROVEMENT_INSTRUCTIONS.md) ## Dedupe notes Synthesizes the approval-token concept from the main workflow doc and the Agent33 improvement transfer notes. ## Source excerpts ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/V2_MULTI_AGENT_WORKFLOWS.md With EVOKORE-MCP v2.0 fully operational, we can now leverage 40+ proxied GitHub and Filesystem tools seamlessly within complex multi-agent workflows. The core architectural advancements include: ## 1. Dynamic Tool Prefixing & Indexing Instead of loading 40+ tools into an LLM's context window statically (which causes massive bloat), EVOKORE's `ProxyManager` boots child servers (like `@modelcontextprotocol/server-github` and `@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem`) and dynamically prefixes their tools (`github_create_issue`, `fs_write_file`). This prevents namespace collisions while keeping the tools accessible to native skills. ## 2. Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) Security Interceptor Automated multi-agent workflows involving sensitive endpoints (like GitHub write access or file deletion) are governed by EVOKORE's stateless `_evokore_approval_token` architecture. - When an agent attempts a restricted action, the tool call is intercepted and blocked. - The server returns an error explicitly commanding the agent to prompt the human for approval. - Upon approval, the agent retries the exact tool call with the injected token, securely fulfilling the workflow without severing the conversational context. ## 3. Active Skill Orchestration (Native Harnessing) Unlike v1.0 where skills merel ... ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/AGENT33_IMPROVEMENT_INSTRUCTIONS.md > **Purpose**: Feed this file into Claude Code CLI when working on the Agent33 repo. It contains patterns, architectures, and capabilities proven in EVOKORE-MCP that Agent33 should adopt. --- ## 1. Multi-Server MCP Aggregation Pattern **What Agent33 lacks**: Agent33's MCP server (Phase 43) is a single-endpoint bridge. It doesn't aggregate multiple child MCP servers behind a unified namespace. **What to build**: A proxy layer that spawns and manages multiple child MCP servers from a single config file, presenting them as one unified tool surface. ### Implementation spec: ``` mcp.config.json { "servers": { "github": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-github"], "env": { "GITHUB_TOKEN": "${GITHUB_TOKEN}" } }, "fs": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem", "./"] }, "elevenlabs": { "command": "uvx", "args": ["elevenlabs-mcp"], "env": { "ELEVENLABS_API_KEY": "${ELEVENLABS_API_KEY}" } } } } ``` **Key patterns from EVOKORE**: - **Tool name prefixing**: Every proxied tool gets renamed `{serverId}_{originalName}` to prevent namespace collisions (e.g., `github_create_issue`, `fs_read_file`). First-registration-wins for duplicates. - **Environment interpolation**: `${VAR}` syntax in `env` blocks resolved ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ“textβ€’6 months ago

Guardrailed Code Review Pipeline

Run a staged code review workflow with explicit risk assessment, reviewer handoffs, and merge gates.

coding
⭐1
# Guardrailed Code Review Pipeline Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this workflow when a change needs structured review evidence, clear approval stages, and a rollback-aware path to merge. ## Use this when - Multi-step L1 and L2 review signoff - High-risk changes that need audit trails - Standardizing reviewer decisions before merge ## Expected outcomes - Review states and approval checkpoints stay explicit - Risk assessment and evidence are captured before merge - The workflow remains small enough to reuse across repositories ## Source synthesis - AGENT33/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md) - AGENT33/docs/walkthroughs.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/walkthroughs.md) ## Dedupe notes Combines AGENT33 lifecycle mapping and operator walkthrough material into one review-oriented site entry. ## Source excerpts ### AGENT33/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md ### 4.1 Review Lifecycle States: - `draft -> ready -> l1-review -> l1-approved -> (optional l2-review -> l2-approved) -> approved -> merged` Main APIs: - `/v1/reviews/{id}/assess` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/assign-l1` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/l1` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/assign-l2` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/l2` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/approve` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/merge` ### AGENT33/docs/walkthroughs.md ## 4. Review Lifecycle (Two-Layer Signoff) Create review: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/ \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"task_id":"TASK-101","branch":"feat/docs-refresh","pr_number":12}' ``` Assess risk: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/assess \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"triggers":["api-public","security"]}' ``` Move to ready and assign L1: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/ready -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/assign-l1 -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" ``` Submit L1 decision: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/l1 \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"decision":"approved","issues":[],"comments":"L1 pass"}' ``` If L2 required, continue: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/assign-l2 -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/l2 \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"decision":"approved","issues":[],"commen ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

solidity-security

Master smart contract security best practices to prevent common

security
⭐1
# Solidity Security Master smart contract security best practices, vulnerability prevention, and secure Solidity development patterns. ## When to Use This Skill - Writing secure smart contracts - Auditing existing contracts for vulnerabilities - Implementing secure DeFi protocols - Preventing reentrancy, overflow, and access control issues - Optimizing gas usage while maintaining security - Preparing contracts for professional audits - Understanding common attack vectors ## Critical Vulnerabilities ### 1. Reentrancy Attacker calls back into your contract before state is updated. **Vulnerable Code:** ```solidity // VULNERABLE TO REENTRANCY contract VulnerableBank { mapping(address => uint256) public balances; function withdraw() public { uint256 amount = balances[msg.sender]; // DANGER: External call before state update (bool success, ) = msg.sender.call{value: amount}(""); require(success); balances[msg.sender] = 0; // Too late! } } ``` **Secure Pattern (Checks-Effects-Interactions):** ```solidity contract SecureBank { mapping(address => uint256) public balances; function withdraw() public { uint256 amount = balances[msg.sender]; require(amount > 0, "Insufficient balance"); // EFFECTS: Update state BEFORE external call balances[msg.sender] = 0; // INTERACTIONS: External call last (bool success, ) = msg.sender.call{value: amount}(""); require(success, "Transfer failed"); } } ``` **Alternative: ReentrancyGuard** ```solidity import "@openzeppelin/contracts/security/ReentrancyGuard.sol"; contract SecureBank is ReentrancyGuard { mapping(address => uint256) public balances; function withdraw() public nonReentrant { uint256 amount = balances[msg.sender]; require(amount > 0, "Insufficient balance"); balances[msg.sender] = 0; (bool success, ) = msg.sender.call{value: amount}(""); require(success, "Transfer failed"); } } ``` ### 2. Integer Overflow/Underflow **Vulnerable Code (Solidity < 0.8.0):** ```solidity // VULNERABLE contract VulnerableToken { mapping(address => uint256) public balances; function transfer(address to, uint256 amount) public { // No overflow check - can wrap around balances[msg.sender] -= amount; // Can underflow! balances[to] += amount; // Can overflow! } } ``` **Secure Pattern (Solidity >= 0.8.0):** ```solidity // Solidity 0.8+ has built-in overflow/underflow checks contract SecureToken { mapping(address => uint256) public balances; function transfer(address to, uint256 amount) public { // Automatically reverts on overflow/underflow balances[msg.sender] -= amount; balances[to] += amount; } } ``` **For Solidity < 0.8.0, use SafeMath:** ```solidity import "@openzeppelin/contracts/utils/math/SafeMath.sol"; contract SecureToken { using SafeMath for uint256; mapping(address => uint256) public balances; function transfer(address to, uint256 amount) public { balances[msg.sender] = balances[msg.sender].sub(amount); balances[to] = balances[to].add(amount); } } ``` ### 3. Access Control **Vulnerable Code:** ```solidity // VULNERABLE: Anyone can call critical functions contract VulnerableContract { address public owner; function withdraw(uint256 amount) public { // No access control! payable(msg.sender).transfer(amount); } } ``` **Secure Pattern:** ```solidity import "@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol"; contract SecureContract is Ownable { function withdraw(uint256 amount) public onlyOwner { payable(owner()).transfer(amount); } } // Or implement custom role-based access contract RoleBasedContract { mapping(address => bool) public admins; modifier onlyAdmin() { require(admins[msg.sender], "Not an admin"); _; } function criticalFunction() public onlyAdmin { // Protected function } } ``` ### 4. Front-Running **Vulnerable:** ```solidity // VULNERABLE TO FRONT-RUNNING contract VulnerableDEX { function swap(uint256 amount, uint256 minOutput) public { // Attacker sees this in mempool and front-runs uint256 output = calculateOutput(amount); require(output >= minOutput, "Slippage too high"); // Perform swap } } ``` **Mitigation:** ```solidity contract SecureDEX { mapping(bytes32 => bool) public usedCommitments; // Step 1: Commit to trade function commitTrade(bytes32 commitment) public { usedCommitments[commitment] = true; } // Step 2: Reveal trade (next block) function revealTrade( uint256 amount, uint256 minOutput, bytes32 secret ) public { bytes32 commitment = keccak256(abi.encodePacked( msg.sender, amount, minOutput, secret )); require(usedCommitments[commitment], "Invalid commitment"); // Perform swap } } ``` ## Security Best Practices ### Checks-Effects-Interactions Pattern ```solidity contract SecurePattern { mapping(address => uint256) public balances; function withdraw(uint256 amount) public { // 1. CHECKS: Validate conditions require(amount <= balances[msg.sender], "Insufficient balance"); require(amount > 0, "Amount must be positive"); // 2. EFFECTS: Update state balances[msg.sender] -= amount; // 3. INTERACTIONS: External calls last (bool success, ) = msg.sender.call{value: amount}(""); require(success, "Transfer failed"); } } ``` ### Pull Over Push Pattern ```solidity // Prefer this (pull) contract SecurePayment { mapping(address => uint256) public pendingWithdrawals; function recordPayment(address recipient, uint256 amount) internal { pendingWithdrawals[recipient] += amount; } function withdraw() public { uint256 amount = pendingWithdrawals[msg.sender]; require(amount > 0, "Nothing to withdraw"); pendingWithdrawals[msg.sender] = 0; payable(msg.sender).transfer(amount); } } // Over this (push) contract RiskyPayment { function distributePayments(address[] memory recipients, uint256[] memory amounts) public { for (uint i = 0; i < recipients.length; i++) { // If any transfer fails, entire batch fails payable(recipients[i]).transfer(amounts[i]); } } } ``` ### Input Validation ```solidity contract SecureContract { function transfer(address to, uint256 amount) public { // Validate inputs require(to != address(0), "Invalid recipient"); require(to != address(this), "Cannot send to contract"); require(amount > 0, "Amount must be positive"); require(amount <= balances[msg.sender], "Insufficient balance"); // Proceed with transfer balances[msg.sender] -= amount; balances[to] += amount; } } ``` ### Emergency Stop (Circuit Breaker) ```solidity import "@openzeppelin/contracts/security/Pausable.sol"; contract EmergencyStop is Pausable, Ownable { function criticalFunction() public whenNotPaused { // Function logic } function emergencyStop() public onlyOwner { _pause(); } function resume() public onlyOwner { _unpause(); } } ``` ## Gas Optimization ### Use `uint256` Instead of Smaller Types ```solidity // More gas efficient contract GasEfficient { uint256 public value; // Optimal function set(uint256 _value) public { value = _value; } } // Less efficient contract GasInefficient { uint8 public value; // Still uses 256-bit slot function set(uint8 _value) public { value = _value; // Extra gas for type conversion } } ``` ### Pack Storage Variables ```solidity // Gas efficient (3 variables in 1 slot) contract PackedStorage { uint128 public a; // Slot 0 uint64 public b; // Slot 0 uint64 public c; // Slot 0 uint256 public d; // Slot 1 } // Gas inefficient (each variable in separate slot) contract UnpackedStorage { uint256 public a; // Slot 0 uint256 public b; // Slot 1 uint256 public c; // Slot 2 uint256 public d; // Slot 3 } ``` ### Use `calldata` Instead of `memory` for Function Arguments ```solidity contract GasOptimized { // More gas efficient function processData(uint256[] calldata data) public pure returns (uint256) { return data[0]; } // Less efficient function processDataMemory(uint256[] memory data) public pure returns (uint256) { return data[0]; } } ``` ### Use Events for Data Storage (When Appropriate) ```solidity contract EventStorage { // Emitting events is cheaper than storage event DataStored(address indexed user, uint256 indexed id, bytes data); function storeData(uint256 id, bytes calldata data) public { emit DataStored(msg.sender, id, data); // Don't store in contract storage unless needed } } ``` ## Common Vulnerabilities Checklist ```solidity // Security Checklist Contract contract SecurityChecklist { /** * [ ] Reentrancy protection (ReentrancyGuard or CEI pattern) * [ ] Integer overflow/underflow (Solidity 0.8+ or SafeMath) * [ ] Access control (Ownable, roles, modifiers) * [ ] Input validation (require statements) * [ ] Front-running mitigation (commit-reveal if applicable) * [ ] Gas optimization (packed storage, calldata) * [ ] Emergency stop mechanism (Pausable) * [ ] Pull over push pattern for payments * [ ] No delegatecall to untrusted contracts * [ ] No tx.origin for authentication (use msg.sender) * [ ] Proper event emission * [ ] External calls at end of function * [ ] Check return values of external calls * [ ] No hardcoded addresses * [ ] Upgrade mechanism (if proxy pattern) */ } ``` ## Testing for Security ```javascript // Hardhat test example const { expect } = require("chai"); const { ethers } = require("hardhat"); describe("Security Tests", function () { it("Should prevent reentrancy attack", async function () { const [attacker] = await ethers.getSigners(); const VictimBank = await ethers.getContractFactory("SecureBank"); const bank = await VictimBank.deploy(); const Attacker = await ethers.getContractFactory("ReentrancyAttacker"); const attackerContract = await Attacker.deploy(bank.address); // Deposit funds await bank.deposit({ value: ethers.utils.parseEther("10") }); // Attempt reentrancy attack await expect( attackerContract.attack({ value: ethers.utils.parseEther("1") }), ).to.be.revertedWith("ReentrancyGuard: reentrant call"); }); it("Should prevent integer overflow", async function () { const Token = await ethers.getContractFactory("SecureToken"); const token = await Token.deploy(); // Attempt overflow await expect(token.transfer(attacker.address, ethers.constants.MaxUint256)) .to.be.reverted; }); it("Should enforce access control", async function () { const [owner, attacker] = await ethers.getSigners(); const Contract = await ethers.getContractFactory("SecureContract"); const contract = await Contract.deploy(); // Attempt unauthorized withdrawal await expect(contract.connect(attacker).withdraw(100)).to.be.revertedWith( "Ownable: caller is not the owner", ); }); }); ``` ## Audit Preparation ```solidity contract WellDocumentedContract { /** * @title Well Documented Contract * @dev Example of proper documentation for audits * @notice This contract handles user deposits and withdrawals */ /// @notice Mapping of user balances mapping(address => uint256) public balances; /** * @dev Deposits ETH into the contract * @notice Anyone can deposit funds */ function deposit() public payable { require(msg.value > 0, "Must send ETH"); balances[msg.sender] += msg.value; } /** * @dev Withdraws user's balance * @notice Follows CEI pattern to prevent reentrancy * @param amount Amount to withdraw in wei */ function withdraw(uint256 amount) public { // CHECKS require(amount <= balances[msg.sender], "Insufficient balance"); // EFFECTS balances[msg.sender] -= amount; // INTERACTIONS (bool success, ) = msg.sender.call{value: amount}(""); require(success, "Transfer failed"); } } ``` ## Resources - **references/reentrancy.md**: Comprehensive reentrancy prevention - **references/access-control.md**: Role-based access patterns - **references/overflow-underflow.md**: SafeMath and integer safety - **references/gas-optimization.md**: Gas saving techniques - **references/vulnerability-patterns.md**: Common vulnerability catalog - **assets/solidity-contracts-templates.sol**: Secure contract templates - **assets/security-checklist.md**: Pre-audit checklist - **scripts/analyze-contract.sh**: Static analysis tools ## Tools for Security Analysis - **Slither**: Static analysis tool - **Mythril**: Security analysis tool - **Echidna**: Fuzzing tool - **Manticore**: Symbolic execution - **Securify**: Automated security scanner ## Common Pitfalls 1. **Using `tx.origin` for Authentication**: Use `msg.sender` instead 2. **Unchecked External Calls**: Always check return values 3. **Delegatecall to Untrusted Contracts**: Can hijack your contract 4. **Floating Pragma**: Pin to specific Solidity version 5. **Missing Events**: Emit events for state changes 6. **Excessive Gas in Loops**: Can hit block gas limit 7. **No Upgrade Path**: Consider proxy patterns if upgrades needed
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

deployment-pipeline-design

Design multi-stage CI/CD pipelines with approval gates, security

coding
⭐1
# Deployment Pipeline Design Architecture patterns for multi-stage CI/CD pipelines with approval gates and deployment strategies. ## Purpose Design robust, secure deployment pipelines that balance speed with safety through proper stage organization and approval workflows. ## When to Use - Design CI/CD architecture - Implement deployment gates - Configure multi-environment pipelines - Establish deployment best practices - Implement progressive delivery ## Pipeline Stages ### Standard Pipeline Flow ``` β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ Build β”‚ β†’ β”‚ Test β”‚ β†’ β”‚ Staging β”‚ β†’ β”‚ Approveβ”‚ β†’ β”‚Productionβ”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ ``` ### Detailed Stage Breakdown 1. **Source** - Code checkout 2. **Build** - Compile, package, containerize 3. **Test** - Unit, integration, security scans 4. **Staging Deploy** - Deploy to staging environment 5. **Integration Tests** - E2E, smoke tests 6. **Approval Gate** - Manual approval required 7. **Production Deploy** - Canary, blue-green, rolling 8. **Verification** - Health checks, monitoring 9. **Rollback** - Automated rollback on failure ## Approval Gate Patterns ### Pattern 1: Manual Approval ```yaml # GitHub Actions production-deploy: needs: staging-deploy environment: name: production url: https://app.example.com runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - name: Deploy to production run: | # Deployment commands ``` ### Pattern 2: Time-Based Approval ```yaml # GitLab CI deploy:production: stage: deploy script: - deploy.sh production environment: name: production when: delayed start_in: 30 minutes only: - main ``` ### Pattern 3: Multi-Approver ```yaml # Azure Pipelines stages: - stage: Production dependsOn: Staging jobs: - deployment: Deploy environment: name: production resourceType: Kubernetes strategy: runOnce: preDeploy: steps: - task: ManualValidation@0 inputs: notifyUsers: "team-leads@example.com" instructions: "Review staging metrics before approving" ``` **Reference:** See `assets/approval-gate-template.yml` ## Deployment Strategies ### 1. Rolling Deployment ```yaml apiVersion: apps/v1 kind: Deployment metadata: name: my-app spec: replicas: 10 strategy: type: RollingUpdate rollingUpdate: maxSurge: 2 maxUnavailable: 1 ``` **Characteristics:** - Gradual rollout - Zero downtime - Easy rollback - Best for most applications ### 2. Blue-Green Deployment ```yaml # Blue (current) kubectl apply -f blue-deployment.yaml kubectl label service my-app version=blue # Green (new) kubectl apply -f green-deployment.yaml # Test green environment kubectl label service my-app version=green # Rollback if needed kubectl label service my-app version=blue ``` **Characteristics:** - Instant switchover - Easy rollback - Doubles infrastructure cost temporarily - Good for high-risk deployments ### 3. Canary Deployment ```yaml apiVersion: argoproj.io/v1alpha1 kind: Rollout metadata: name: my-app spec: replicas: 10 strategy: canary: steps: - setWeight: 10 - pause: { duration: 5m } - setWeight: 25 - pause: { duration: 5m } - setWeight: 50 - pause: { duration: 5m } - setWeight: 100 ``` **Characteristics:** - Gradual traffic shift - Risk mitigation - Real user testing - Requires service mesh or similar ### 4. Feature Flags ```python from flagsmith import Flagsmith flagsmith = Flagsmith(environment_key="API_KEY") if flagsmith.has_feature("new_checkout_flow"): # New code path process_checkout_v2() else: # Existing code path process_checkout_v1() ``` **Characteristics:** - Deploy without releasing - A/B testing - Instant rollback - Granular control ## Pipeline Orchestration ### Multi-Stage Pipeline Example ```yaml name: Production Pipeline on: push: branches: [main] jobs: build: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - name: Build application run: make build - name: Build Docker image run: docker build -t myapp:${{ github.sha }} . - name: Push to registry run: docker push myapp:${{ github.sha }} test: needs: build runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - name: Unit tests run: make test - name: Security scan run: trivy image myapp:${{ github.sha }} deploy-staging: needs: test runs-on: ubuntu-latest environment: name: staging steps: - name: Deploy to staging run: kubectl apply -f k8s/staging/ integration-test: needs: deploy-staging runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - name: Run E2E tests run: npm run test:e2e deploy-production: needs: integration-test runs-on: ubuntu-latest environment: name: production steps: - name: Canary deployment run: | kubectl apply -f k8s/production/ kubectl argo rollouts promote my-app verify: needs: deploy-production runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - name: Health check run: curl -f https://app.example.com/health - name: Notify team run: | curl -X POST ${{ secrets.SLACK_WEBHOOK }} \ -d '{"text":"Production deployment successful!"}' ``` ## Pipeline Best Practices 1. **Fail fast** - Run quick tests first 2. **Parallel execution** - Run independent jobs concurrently 3. **Caching** - Cache dependencies between runs 4. **Artifact management** - Store build artifacts 5. **Environment parity** - Keep environments consistent 6. **Secrets management** - Use secret stores (Vault, etc.) 7. **Deployment windows** - Schedule deployments appropriately 8. **Monitoring integration** - Track deployment metrics 9. **Rollback automation** - Auto-rollback on failures 10. **Documentation** - Document pipeline stages ## Rollback Strategies ### Automated Rollback ```yaml deploy-and-verify: steps: - name: Deploy new version run: kubectl apply -f k8s/ - name: Wait for rollout run: kubectl rollout status deployment/my-app - name: Health check id: health run: | for i in {1..10}; do if curl -sf https://app.example.com/health; then exit 0 fi sleep 10 done exit 1 - name: Rollback on failure if: failure() run: kubectl rollout undo deployment/my-app ``` ### Manual Rollback ```bash # List revision history kubectl rollout history deployment/my-app # Rollback to previous version kubectl rollout undo deployment/my-app # Rollback to specific revision kubectl rollout undo deployment/my-app --to-revision=3 ``` ## Monitoring and Metrics ### Key Pipeline Metrics - **Deployment Frequency** - How often deployments occur - **Lead Time** - Time from commit to production - **Change Failure Rate** - Percentage of failed deployments - **Mean Time to Recovery (MTTR)** - Time to recover from failure - **Pipeline Success Rate** - Percentage of successful runs - **Average Pipeline Duration** - Time to complete pipeline ### Integration with Monitoring ```yaml - name: Post-deployment verification run: | # Wait for metrics stabilization sleep 60 # Check error rate ERROR_RATE=$(curl -s "$PROMETHEUS_URL/api/v1/query?query=rate(http_errors_total[5m])" | jq '.data.result[0].value[1]') if (( $(echo "$ERROR_RATE > 0.01" | bc -l) )); then echo "Error rate too high: $ERROR_RATE" exit 1 fi ``` ## Reference Files - `references/pipeline-orchestration.md` - Complex pipeline patterns - `assets/approval-gate-template.yml` - Approval workflow templates ## Related Skills - `github-actions-templates` - For GitHub Actions implementation - `gitlab-ci-patterns` - For GitLab CI implementation - `secrets-management` - For secrets handling
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

team-composition-patterns

Design optimal agent team compositions with sizing heuristics,

coding
⭐1
# Team Composition Patterns Best practices for composing multi-agent teams, selecting team sizes, choosing agent types, and configuring display modes for Claude Code's Agent Teams feature. ## When to Use This Skill - Deciding how many teammates to spawn for a task - Choosing between preset team configurations - Selecting the right agent type (subagent_type) for each role - Configuring teammate display modes (tmux, iTerm2, in-process) - Building custom team compositions for non-standard workflows ## Team Sizing Heuristics | Complexity | Team Size | When to Use | | ------------ | --------- | ----------------------------------------------------------- | | Simple | 1-2 | Single-dimension review, isolated bug, small feature | | Moderate | 2-3 | Multi-file changes, 2-3 concerns, medium features | | Complex | 3-4 | Cross-cutting concerns, large features, deep debugging | | Very Complex | 4-5 | Full-stack features, comprehensive reviews, systemic issues | **Rule of thumb**: Start with the smallest team that covers all required dimensions. Adding teammates increases coordination overhead. ## Preset Team Compositions ### Review Team - **Size**: 3 reviewers - **Agents**: 3x `team-reviewer` - **Default dimensions**: security, performance, architecture - **Use when**: Code changes need multi-dimensional quality assessment ### Debug Team - **Size**: 3 investigators - **Agents**: 3x `team-debugger` - **Default hypotheses**: 3 competing hypotheses - **Use when**: Bug has multiple plausible root causes ### Feature Team - **Size**: 3 (1 lead + 2 implementers) - **Agents**: 1x `team-lead` + 2x `team-implementer` - **Use when**: Feature can be decomposed into parallel work streams ### Fullstack Team - **Size**: 4 (1 lead + 3 implementers) - **Agents**: 1x `team-lead` + 1x frontend `team-implementer` + 1x backend `team-implementer` + 1x test `team-implementer` - **Use when**: Feature spans frontend, backend, and test layers ### Research Team - **Size**: 3 researchers - **Agents**: 3x `general-purpose` - **Default areas**: Each assigned a different research question, module, or topic - **Capabilities**: Codebase search (Grep, Glob, Read), web search (WebSearch, WebFetch) - **Use when**: Need to understand a codebase, research libraries, compare approaches, or gather information from code and web sources in parallel ### Security Team - **Size**: 4 reviewers - **Agents**: 4x `team-reviewer` - **Default dimensions**: OWASP/vulnerabilities, auth/access control, dependencies/supply chain, secrets/configuration - **Use when**: Comprehensive security audit covering multiple attack surfaces ### Migration Team - **Size**: 4 (1 lead + 2 implementers + 1 reviewer) - **Agents**: 1x `team-lead` + 2x `team-implementer` + 1x `team-reviewer` - **Use when**: Large codebase migration (framework upgrade, language port, API version bump) requiring parallel work with correctness verification ## Agent Type Selection When spawning teammates with the Task tool, choose `subagent_type` based on what tools the teammate needs: | Agent Type | Tools Available | Use For | | ------------------------------ | ----------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- | | `general-purpose` | All tools (Read, Write, Edit, Bash, etc.) | Implementation, debugging, any task requiring file changes | | `Explore` | Read-only tools (Read, Grep, Glob) | Research, code exploration, analysis | | `Plan` | Read-only tools | Architecture planning, task decomposition | | `agent-teams:team-reviewer` | All tools | Code review with structured findings | | `agent-teams:team-debugger` | All tools | Hypothesis-driven investigation | | `agent-teams:team-implementer` | All tools | Building features within file ownership boundaries | | `agent-teams:team-lead` | All tools | Team orchestration and coordination | **Key distinction**: Read-only agents (Explore, Plan) cannot modify files. Never assign implementation tasks to read-only agents. ## Display Mode Configuration Configure in `~/.claude/settings.json`: ```json { "teammateMode": "tmux" } ``` | Mode | Behavior | Best For | | -------------- | ------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------- | | `"tmux"` | Each teammate in a tmux pane | Development workflows, monitoring multiple agents | | `"iterm2"` | Each teammate in an iTerm2 tab | macOS users who prefer iTerm2 | | `"in-process"` | All teammates in same process | Simple tasks, CI/CD environments | ## Custom Team Guidelines When building custom teams: 1. **Every team needs a coordinator** β€” Either designate a `team-lead` or have the user coordinate directly 2. **Match roles to agent types** β€” Use specialized agents (reviewer, debugger, implementer) when available 3. **Avoid duplicate roles** β€” Two agents doing the same thing wastes resources 4. **Define boundaries upfront** β€” Each teammate needs clear ownership of files or responsibilities 5. **Keep it small** β€” 2-4 teammates is the sweet spot; 5+ requires significant coordination overhead
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

secrets-management

Implement secure secrets management for CI/CD pipelines using

coding
⭐1
# Secrets Management Secure secrets management practices for CI/CD pipelines using Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, and other tools. ## Purpose Implement secure secrets management in CI/CD pipelines without hardcoding sensitive information. ## When to Use - Store API keys and credentials - Manage database passwords - Handle TLS certificates - Rotate secrets automatically - Implement least-privilege access ## Secrets Management Tools ### HashiCorp Vault - Centralized secrets management - Dynamic secrets generation - Secret rotation - Audit logging - Fine-grained access control ### AWS Secrets Manager - AWS-native solution - Automatic rotation - Integration with RDS - CloudFormation support ### Azure Key Vault - Azure-native solution - HSM-backed keys - Certificate management - RBAC integration ### Google Secret Manager - GCP-native solution - Versioning - IAM integration ## HashiCorp Vault Integration ### Setup Vault ```bash # Start Vault dev server vault server -dev # Set environment export VAULT_ADDR='http://127.0.0.1:8200' export VAULT_TOKEN='root' # Enable secrets engine vault secrets enable -path=secret kv-v2 # Store secret vault kv put secret/database/config username=admin password=secret ``` ### GitHub Actions with Vault ```yaml name: Deploy with Vault Secrets on: [push] jobs: deploy: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - name: Import Secrets from Vault uses: hashicorp/vault-action@v2 with: url: https://vault.example.com:8200 token: ${{ secrets.VAULT_TOKEN }} secrets: | secret/data/database username | DB_USERNAME ; secret/data/database password | DB_PASSWORD ; secret/data/api key | API_KEY - name: Use secrets run: | echo "Connecting to database as $DB_USERNAME" # Use $DB_PASSWORD, $API_KEY ``` ### GitLab CI with Vault ```yaml deploy: image: vault:latest before_script: - export VAULT_ADDR=https://vault.example.com:8200 - export VAULT_TOKEN=$VAULT_TOKEN - apk add curl jq script: - | DB_PASSWORD=$(vault kv get -field=password secret/database/config) API_KEY=$(vault kv get -field=key secret/api/credentials) echo "Deploying with secrets..." # Use $DB_PASSWORD, $API_KEY ``` **Reference:** See `references/vault-setup.md` ## AWS Secrets Manager ### Store Secret ```bash aws secretsmanager create-secret \ --name production/database/password \ --secret-string "super-secret-password" ``` ### Retrieve in GitHub Actions ```yaml - name: Configure AWS credentials uses: aws-actions/configure-aws-credentials@v4 with: aws-access-key-id: ${{ secrets.AWS_ACCESS_KEY_ID }} aws-secret-access-key: ${{ secrets.AWS_SECRET_ACCESS_KEY }} aws-region: us-west-2 - name: Get secret from AWS run: | SECRET=$(aws secretsmanager get-secret-value \ --secret-id production/database/password \ --query SecretString \ --output text) echo "::add-mask::$SECRET" echo "DB_PASSWORD=$SECRET" >> $GITHUB_ENV - name: Use secret run: | # Use $DB_PASSWORD ./deploy.sh ``` ### Terraform with AWS Secrets Manager ```hcl data "aws_secretsmanager_secret_version" "db_password" { secret_id = "production/database/password" } resource "aws_db_instance" "main" { allocated_storage = 100 engine = "postgres" instance_class = "db.t3.large" username = "admin" password = jsondecode(data.aws_secretsmanager_secret_version.db_password.secret_string)["password"] } ``` ## GitHub Secrets ### Organization/Repository Secrets ```yaml - name: Use GitHub secret run: | echo "API Key: ${{ secrets.API_KEY }}" echo "Database URL: ${{ secrets.DATABASE_URL }}" ``` ### Environment Secrets ```yaml deploy: runs-on: ubuntu-latest environment: production steps: - name: Deploy run: | echo "Deploying with ${{ secrets.PROD_API_KEY }}" ``` **Reference:** See `references/github-secrets.md` ## GitLab CI/CD Variables ### Project Variables ```yaml deploy: script: - echo "Deploying with $API_KEY" - echo "Database: $DATABASE_URL" ``` ### Protected and Masked Variables - Protected: Only available in protected branches - Masked: Hidden in job logs - File type: Stored as file ## Best Practices 1. **Never commit secrets** to Git 2. **Use different secrets** per environment 3. **Rotate secrets regularly** 4. **Implement least-privilege access** 5. **Enable audit logging** 6. **Use secret scanning** (GitGuardian, TruffleHog) 7. **Mask secrets in logs** 8. **Encrypt secrets at rest** 9. **Use short-lived tokens** when possible 10. **Document secret requirements** ## Secret Rotation ### Automated Rotation with AWS ```python import boto3 import json def lambda_handler(event, context): client = boto3.client('secretsmanager') # Get current secret response = client.get_secret_value(SecretId='my-secret') current_secret = json.loads(response['SecretString']) # Generate new password new_password = generate_strong_password() # Update database password update_database_password(new_password) # Update secret client.put_secret_value( SecretId='my-secret', SecretString=json.dumps({ 'username': current_secret['username'], 'password': new_password }) ) return {'statusCode': 200} ``` ### Manual Rotation Process 1. Generate new secret 2. Update secret in secret store 3. Update applications to use new secret 4. Verify functionality 5. Revoke old secret ## External Secrets Operator ### Kubernetes Integration ```yaml apiVersion: external-secrets.io/v1beta1 kind: SecretStore metadata: name: vault-backend namespace: production spec: provider: vault: server: "https://vault.example.com:8200" path: "secret" version: "v2" auth: kubernetes: mountPath: "kubernetes" role: "production" --- apiVersion: external-secrets.io/v1beta1 kind: ExternalSecret metadata: name: database-credentials namespace: production spec: refreshInterval: 1h secretStoreRef: name: vault-backend kind: SecretStore target: name: database-credentials creationPolicy: Owner data: - secretKey: username remoteRef: key: database/config property: username - secretKey: password remoteRef: key: database/config property: password ``` ## Secret Scanning ### Pre-commit Hook ```bash #!/bin/bash # .git/hooks/pre-commit # Check for secrets with TruffleHog docker run --rm -v "$(pwd):/repo" \ trufflesecurity/trufflehog:latest \ filesystem --directory=/repo if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then echo "❌ Secret detected! Commit blocked." exit 1 fi ``` ### CI/CD Secret Scanning ```yaml secret-scan: stage: security image: trufflesecurity/trufflehog:latest script: - trufflehog filesystem . allow_failure: false ``` ## Reference Files - `references/vault-setup.md` - HashiCorp Vault configuration - `references/github-secrets.md` - GitHub Secrets best practices ## Related Skills - `github-actions-templates` - For GitHub Actions integration - `gitlab-ci-patterns` - For GitLab CI integration - `deployment-pipeline-design` - For pipeline architecture
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

defi-protocol-templates

Implement DeFi protocols with production-ready templates for

coding
⭐1
# DeFi Protocol Templates Production-ready templates for common DeFi protocols including staking, AMMs, governance, lending, and flash loans. ## When to Use This Skill - Building staking platforms with reward distribution - Implementing AMM (Automated Market Maker) protocols - Creating governance token systems - Developing lending/borrowing protocols - Integrating flash loan functionality - Launching yield farming platforms ## Staking Contract ```solidity // SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT pragma solidity ^0.8.0; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/IERC20.sol"; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/security/ReentrancyGuard.sol"; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol"; contract StakingRewards is ReentrancyGuard, Ownable { IERC20 public stakingToken; IERC20 public rewardsToken; uint256 public rewardRate = 100; // Rewards per second uint256 public lastUpdateTime; uint256 public rewardPerTokenStored; mapping(address => uint256) public userRewardPerTokenPaid; mapping(address => uint256) public rewards; mapping(address => uint256) public balances; uint256 private _totalSupply; event Staked(address indexed user, uint256 amount); event Withdrawn(address indexed user, uint256 amount); event RewardPaid(address indexed user, uint256 reward); constructor(address _stakingToken, address _rewardsToken) { stakingToken = IERC20(_stakingToken); rewardsToken = IERC20(_rewardsToken); } modifier updateReward(address account) { rewardPerTokenStored = rewardPerToken(); lastUpdateTime = block.timestamp; if (account != address(0)) { rewards[account] = earned(account); userRewardPerTokenPaid[account] = rewardPerTokenStored; } _; } function rewardPerToken() public view returns (uint256) { if (_totalSupply == 0) { return rewardPerTokenStored; } return rewardPerTokenStored + ((block.timestamp - lastUpdateTime) * rewardRate * 1e18) / _totalSupply; } function earned(address account) public view returns (uint256) { return (balances[account] * (rewardPerToken() - userRewardPerTokenPaid[account])) / 1e18 + rewards[account]; } function stake(uint256 amount) external nonReentrant updateReward(msg.sender) { require(amount > 0, "Cannot stake 0"); _totalSupply += amount; balances[msg.sender] += amount; stakingToken.transferFrom(msg.sender, address(this), amount); emit Staked(msg.sender, amount); } function withdraw(uint256 amount) public nonReentrant updateReward(msg.sender) { require(amount > 0, "Cannot withdraw 0"); _totalSupply -= amount; balances[msg.sender] -= amount; stakingToken.transfer(msg.sender, amount); emit Withdrawn(msg.sender, amount); } function getReward() public nonReentrant updateReward(msg.sender) { uint256 reward = rewards[msg.sender]; if (reward > 0) { rewards[msg.sender] = 0; rewardsToken.transfer(msg.sender, reward); emit RewardPaid(msg.sender, reward); } } function exit() external { withdraw(balances[msg.sender]); getReward(); } } ``` ## AMM (Automated Market Maker) ```solidity // SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT pragma solidity ^0.8.0; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/IERC20.sol"; contract SimpleAMM { IERC20 public token0; IERC20 public token1; uint256 public reserve0; uint256 public reserve1; uint256 public totalSupply; mapping(address => uint256) public balanceOf; event Mint(address indexed to, uint256 amount); event Burn(address indexed from, uint256 amount); event Swap(address indexed trader, uint256 amount0In, uint256 amount1In, uint256 amount0Out, uint256 amount1Out); constructor(address _token0, address _token1) { token0 = IERC20(_token0); token1 = IERC20(_token1); } function addLiquidity(uint256 amount0, uint256 amount1) external returns (uint256 shares) { token0.transferFrom(msg.sender, address(this), amount0); token1.transferFrom(msg.sender, address(this), amount1); if (totalSupply == 0) { shares = sqrt(amount0 * amount1); } else { shares = min( (amount0 * totalSupply) / reserve0, (amount1 * totalSupply) / reserve1 ); } require(shares > 0, "Shares = 0"); _mint(msg.sender, shares); _update( token0.balanceOf(address(this)), token1.balanceOf(address(this)) ); emit Mint(msg.sender, shares); } function removeLiquidity(uint256 shares) external returns (uint256 amount0, uint256 amount1) { uint256 bal0 = token0.balanceOf(address(this)); uint256 bal1 = token1.balanceOf(address(this)); amount0 = (shares * bal0) / totalSupply; amount1 = (shares * bal1) / totalSupply; require(amount0 > 0 && amount1 > 0, "Amount0 or amount1 = 0"); _burn(msg.sender, shares); _update(bal0 - amount0, bal1 - amount1); token0.transfer(msg.sender, amount0); token1.transfer(msg.sender, amount1); emit Burn(msg.sender, shares); } function swap(address tokenIn, uint256 amountIn) external returns (uint256 amountOut) { require(tokenIn == address(token0) || tokenIn == address(token1), "Invalid token"); bool isToken0 = tokenIn == address(token0); (IERC20 tokenIn_, IERC20 tokenOut, uint256 resIn, uint256 resOut) = isToken0 ? (token0, token1, reserve0, reserve1) : (token1, token0, reserve1, reserve0); tokenIn_.transferFrom(msg.sender, address(this), amountIn); // 0.3% fee uint256 amountInWithFee = (amountIn * 997) / 1000; amountOut = (resOut * amountInWithFee) / (resIn + amountInWithFee); tokenOut.transfer(msg.sender, amountOut); _update( token0.balanceOf(address(this)), token1.balanceOf(address(this)) ); emit Swap(msg.sender, isToken0 ? amountIn : 0, isToken0 ? 0 : amountIn, isToken0 ? 0 : amountOut, isToken0 ? amountOut : 0); } function _mint(address to, uint256 amount) private { balanceOf[to] += amount; totalSupply += amount; } function _burn(address from, uint256 amount) private { balanceOf[from] -= amount; totalSupply -= amount; } function _update(uint256 res0, uint256 res1) private { reserve0 = res0; reserve1 = res1; } function sqrt(uint256 y) private pure returns (uint256 z) { if (y > 3) { z = y; uint256 x = y / 2 + 1; while (x < z) { z = x; x = (y / x + x) / 2; } } else if (y != 0) { z = 1; } } function min(uint256 x, uint256 y) private pure returns (uint256) { return x <= y ? x : y; } } ``` ## Governance Token ```solidity // SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT pragma solidity ^0.8.0; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/extensions/ERC20Votes.sol"; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/access/Ownable.sol"; contract GovernanceToken is ERC20Votes, Ownable { constructor() ERC20("Governance Token", "GOV") ERC20Permit("Governance Token") { _mint(msg.sender, 1000000 * 10**decimals()); } function _afterTokenTransfer( address from, address to, uint256 amount ) internal override(ERC20Votes) { super._afterTokenTransfer(from, to, amount); } function _mint(address to, uint256 amount) internal override(ERC20Votes) { super._mint(to, amount); } function _burn(address account, uint256 amount) internal override(ERC20Votes) { super._burn(account, amount); } } contract Governor is Ownable { GovernanceToken public governanceToken; struct Proposal { uint256 id; address proposer; string description; uint256 forVotes; uint256 againstVotes; uint256 startBlock; uint256 endBlock; bool executed; mapping(address => bool) hasVoted; } uint256 public proposalCount; mapping(uint256 => Proposal) public proposals; uint256 public votingPeriod = 17280; // ~3 days in blocks uint256 public proposalThreshold = 100000 * 10**18; event ProposalCreated(uint256 indexed proposalId, address proposer, string description); event VoteCast(address indexed voter, uint256 indexed proposalId, bool support, uint256 weight); event ProposalExecuted(uint256 indexed proposalId); constructor(address _governanceToken) { governanceToken = GovernanceToken(_governanceToken); } function propose(string memory description) external returns (uint256) { require( governanceToken.getPastVotes(msg.sender, block.number - 1) >= proposalThreshold, "Proposer votes below threshold" ); proposalCount++; Proposal storage newProposal = proposals[proposalCount]; newProposal.id = proposalCount; newProposal.proposer = msg.sender; newProposal.description = description; newProposal.startBlock = block.number; newProposal.endBlock = block.number + votingPeriod; emit ProposalCreated(proposalCount, msg.sender, description); return proposalCount; } function vote(uint256 proposalId, bool support) external { Proposal storage proposal = proposals[proposalId]; require(block.number >= proposal.startBlock, "Voting not started"); require(block.number <= proposal.endBlock, "Voting ended"); require(!proposal.hasVoted[msg.sender], "Already voted"); uint256 weight = governanceToken.getPastVotes(msg.sender, proposal.startBlock); require(weight > 0, "No voting power"); proposal.hasVoted[msg.sender] = true; if (support) { proposal.forVotes += weight; } else { proposal.againstVotes += weight; } emit VoteCast(msg.sender, proposalId, support, weight); } function execute(uint256 proposalId) external { Proposal storage proposal = proposals[proposalId]; require(block.number > proposal.endBlock, "Voting not ended"); require(!proposal.executed, "Already executed"); require(proposal.forVotes > proposal.againstVotes, "Proposal failed"); proposal.executed = true; // Execute proposal logic here emit ProposalExecuted(proposalId); } } ``` ## Flash Loan ```solidity // SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT pragma solidity ^0.8.0; import "@openzeppelin/contracts/token/ERC20/IERC20.sol"; interface IFlashLoanReceiver { function executeOperation( address asset, uint256 amount, uint256 fee, bytes calldata params ) external returns (bool); } contract FlashLoanProvider { IERC20 public token; uint256 public feePercentage = 9; // 0.09% fee event FlashLoan(address indexed borrower, uint256 amount, uint256 fee); constructor(address _token) { token = IERC20(_token); } function flashLoan( address receiver, uint256 amount, bytes calldata params ) external { uint256 balanceBefore = token.balanceOf(address(this)); require(balanceBefore >= amount, "Insufficient liquidity"); uint256 fee = (amount * feePercentage) / 10000; // Send tokens to receiver token.transfer(receiver, amount); // Execute callback require( IFlashLoanReceiver(receiver).executeOperation( address(token), amount, fee, params ), "Flash loan failed" ); // Verify repayment uint256 balanceAfter = token.balanceOf(address(this)); require(balanceAfter >= balanceBefore + fee, "Flash loan not repaid"); emit FlashLoan(receiver, amount, fee); } } // Example flash loan receiver contract FlashLoanReceiver is IFlashLoanReceiver { function executeOperation( address asset, uint256 amount, uint256 fee, bytes calldata params ) external override returns (bool) { // Decode params and execute arbitrage, liquidation, etc. // ... // Approve repayment IERC20(asset).approve(msg.sender, amount + fee); return true; } } ``` ## Resources - **references/staking.md**: Staking mechanics and reward distribution - **references/liquidity-pools.md**: AMM mathematics and pricing - **references/governance-tokens.md**: Governance and voting systems - **references/lending-protocols.md**: Lending/borrowing implementation - **references/flash-loans.md**: Flash loan security and use cases - **assets/staking-contract.sol**: Production staking template - **assets/amm-contract.sol**: Full AMM implementation - **assets/governance-token.sol**: Governance system - **assets/lending-protocol.sol**: Lending platform template ## Best Practices 1. **Use Established Libraries**: OpenZeppelin, Solmate 2. **Test Thoroughly**: Unit tests, integration tests, fuzzing 3. **Audit Before Launch**: Professional security audits 4. **Start Simple**: MVP first, add features incrementally 5. **Monitor**: Track contract health and user activity 6. **Upgradability**: Consider proxy patterns for upgrades 7. **Emergency Controls**: Pause mechanisms for critical issues ## Common DeFi Patterns - **Time-Weighted Average Price (TWAP)**: Price oracle resistance - **Liquidity Mining**: Incentivize liquidity provision - **Vesting**: Lock tokens with gradual release - **Multisig**: Require multiple signatures for critical operations - **Timelocks**: Delay execution of governance decisions
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

hybrid-cloud-networking

Configure secure, high-performance connectivity between on-premises

architecture
⭐1
# Hybrid Cloud Networking Configure secure, high-performance connectivity between on-premises and cloud environments using VPN, Direct Connect, and ExpressRoute. ## Purpose Establish secure, reliable network connectivity between on-premises data centers and cloud providers (AWS, Azure, GCP). ## When to Use - Connect on-premises to cloud - Extend datacenter to cloud - Implement hybrid active-active setups - Meet compliance requirements - Migrate to cloud gradually ## Connection Options ### AWS Connectivity #### 1. Site-to-Site VPN - IPSec VPN over internet - Up to 1.25 Gbps per tunnel - Cost-effective for moderate bandwidth - Higher latency, internet-dependent ```hcl resource "aws_vpn_gateway" "main" { vpc_id = aws_vpc.main.id tags = { Name = "main-vpn-gateway" } } resource "aws_customer_gateway" "main" { bgp_asn = 65000 ip_address = "203.0.113.1" type = "ipsec.1" } resource "aws_vpn_connection" "main" { vpn_gateway_id = aws_vpn_gateway.main.id customer_gateway_id = aws_customer_gateway.main.id type = "ipsec.1" static_routes_only = false } ``` #### 2. AWS Direct Connect - Dedicated network connection - 1 Gbps to 100 Gbps - Lower latency, consistent bandwidth - More expensive, setup time required **Reference:** See `references/direct-connect.md` ### Azure Connectivity #### 1. Site-to-Site VPN ```hcl resource "azurerm_virtual_network_gateway" "vpn" { name = "vpn-gateway" location = azurerm_resource_group.main.location resource_group_name = azurerm_resource_group.main.name type = "Vpn" vpn_type = "RouteBased" sku = "VpnGw1" ip_configuration { name = "vnetGatewayConfig" public_ip_address_id = azurerm_public_ip.vpn.id private_ip_address_allocation = "Dynamic" subnet_id = azurerm_subnet.gateway.id } } ``` #### 2. Azure ExpressRoute - Private connection via connectivity provider - Up to 100 Gbps - Low latency, high reliability - Premium for global connectivity ### GCP Connectivity #### 1. Cloud VPN - IPSec VPN (Classic or HA VPN) - HA VPN: 99.99% SLA - Up to 3 Gbps per tunnel #### 2. Cloud Interconnect - Dedicated (10 Gbps, 100 Gbps) - Partner (50 Mbps to 50 Gbps) - Lower latency than VPN ## Hybrid Network Patterns ### Pattern 1: Hub-and-Spoke ``` On-Premises Datacenter ↓ VPN/Direct Connect ↓ Transit Gateway (AWS) / vWAN (Azure) ↓ β”œβ”€ Production VPC/VNet β”œβ”€ Staging VPC/VNet └─ Development VPC/VNet ``` ### Pattern 2: Multi-Region Hybrid ``` On-Premises β”œβ”€ Direct Connect β†’ us-east-1 └─ Direct Connect β†’ us-west-2 ↓ Cross-Region Peering ``` ### Pattern 3: Multi-Cloud Hybrid ``` On-Premises Datacenter β”œβ”€ Direct Connect β†’ AWS β”œβ”€ ExpressRoute β†’ Azure └─ Interconnect β†’ GCP ``` ## Routing Configuration ### BGP Configuration ``` On-Premises Router: - AS Number: 65000 - Advertise: 10.0.0.0/8 Cloud Router: - AS Number: 64512 (AWS), 65515 (Azure) - Advertise: Cloud VPC/VNet CIDRs ``` ### Route Propagation - Enable route propagation on route tables - Use BGP for dynamic routing - Implement route filtering - Monitor route advertisements ## Security Best Practices 1. **Use private connectivity** (Direct Connect/ExpressRoute) 2. **Implement encryption** for VPN tunnels 3. **Use VPC endpoints** to avoid internet routing 4. **Configure network ACLs** and security groups 5. **Enable VPC Flow Logs** for monitoring 6. **Implement DDoS protection** 7. **Use PrivateLink/Private Endpoints** 8. **Monitor connections** with CloudWatch/Monitor 9. **Implement redundancy** (dual tunnels) 10. **Regular security audits** ## High Availability ### Dual VPN Tunnels ```hcl resource "aws_vpn_connection" "primary" { vpn_gateway_id = aws_vpn_gateway.main.id customer_gateway_id = aws_customer_gateway.primary.id type = "ipsec.1" } resource "aws_vpn_connection" "secondary" { vpn_gateway_id = aws_vpn_gateway.main.id customer_gateway_id = aws_customer_gateway.secondary.id type = "ipsec.1" } ``` ### Active-Active Configuration - Multiple connections from different locations - BGP for automatic failover - Equal-cost multi-path (ECMP) routing - Monitor health of all connections ## Monitoring and Troubleshooting ### Key Metrics - Tunnel status (up/down) - Bytes in/out - Packet loss - Latency - BGP session status ### Troubleshooting ```bash # AWS VPN aws ec2 describe-vpn-connections aws ec2 get-vpn-connection-telemetry # Azure VPN az network vpn-connection show az network vpn-connection show-device-config-script ``` ## Cost Optimization 1. **Right-size connections** based on traffic 2. **Use VPN for low-bandwidth** workloads 3. **Consolidate traffic** through fewer connections 4. **Minimize data transfer** costs 5. **Use Direct Connect** for high bandwidth 6. **Implement caching** to reduce traffic ## Reference Files - `references/vpn-setup.md` - VPN configuration guide - `references/direct-connect.md` - Direct Connect setup ## Related Skills - `multi-cloud-architecture` - For architecture decisions - `terraform-module-library` - For IaC implementation
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

linkerd-patterns

Implement Linkerd service mesh patterns for lightweight,

architecture
⭐1
# Linkerd Patterns Production patterns for Linkerd service mesh - the lightweight, security-first service mesh for Kubernetes. ## When to Use This Skill - Setting up a lightweight service mesh - Implementing automatic mTLS - Configuring traffic splits for canary deployments - Setting up service profiles for per-route metrics - Implementing retries and timeouts - Multi-cluster service mesh ## Core Concepts ### 1. Linkerd Architecture ``` β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ Control Plane β”‚ β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ destiny β”‚ β”‚ identity β”‚ β”‚ proxy-inject β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ Data Plane β”‚ β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ β”‚ β”‚proxy│────│proxy│────│proxyβ”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β” β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ app β”‚ β”‚ app β”‚ β”‚ app β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ ``` ### 2. Key Resources | Resource | Purpose | | ----------------------- | ------------------------------------ | | **ServiceProfile** | Per-route metrics, retries, timeouts | | **TrafficSplit** | Canary deployments, A/B testing | | **Server** | Define server-side policies | | **ServerAuthorization** | Access control policies | ## Templates ### Template 1: Mesh Installation ```bash # Install CLI curl --proto '=https' --tlsv1.2 -sSfL https://run.linkerd.io/install | sh # Validate cluster linkerd check --pre # Install CRDs linkerd install --crds | kubectl apply -f - # Install control plane linkerd install | kubectl apply -f - # Verify installation linkerd check # Install viz extension (optional) linkerd viz install | kubectl apply -f - ``` ### Template 2: Inject Namespace ```yaml # Automatic injection for namespace apiVersion: v1 kind: Namespace metadata: name: my-app annotations: linkerd.io/inject: enabled --- # Or inject specific deployment apiVersion: apps/v1 kind: Deployment metadata: name: my-app annotations: linkerd.io/inject: enabled spec: template: metadata: annotations: linkerd.io/inject: enabled ``` ### Template 3: Service Profile with Retries ```yaml apiVersion: linkerd.io/v1alpha2 kind: ServiceProfile metadata: name: my-service.my-namespace.svc.cluster.local namespace: my-namespace spec: routes: - name: GET /api/users condition: method: GET pathRegex: /api/users responseClasses: - condition: status: min: 500 max: 599 isFailure: true isRetryable: true - name: POST /api/users condition: method: POST pathRegex: /api/users # POST not retryable by default isRetryable: false - name: GET /api/users/{id} condition: method: GET pathRegex: /api/users/[^/]+ timeout: 5s isRetryable: true retryBudget: retryRatio: 0.2 minRetriesPerSecond: 10 ttl: 10s ``` ### Template 4: Traffic Split (Canary) ```yaml apiVersion: split.smi-spec.io/v1alpha1 kind: TrafficSplit metadata: name: my-service-canary namespace: my-namespace spec: service: my-service backends: - service: my-service-stable weight: 900m # 90% - service: my-service-canary weight: 100m # 10% ``` ### Template 5: Server Authorization Policy ```yaml # Define the server apiVersion: policy.linkerd.io/v1beta1 kind: Server metadata: name: my-service-http namespace: my-namespace spec: podSelector: matchLabels: app: my-service port: http proxyProtocol: HTTP/1 --- # Allow traffic from specific clients apiVersion: policy.linkerd.io/v1beta1 kind: ServerAuthorization metadata: name: allow-frontend namespace: my-namespace spec: server: name: my-service-http client: meshTLS: serviceAccounts: - name: frontend namespace: my-namespace --- # Allow unauthenticated traffic (e.g., from ingress) apiVersion: policy.linkerd.io/v1beta1 kind: ServerAuthorization metadata: name: allow-ingress namespace: my-namespace spec: server: name: my-service-http client: unauthenticated: true networks: - cidr: 10.0.0.0/8 ``` ### Template 6: HTTPRoute for Advanced Routing ```yaml apiVersion: policy.linkerd.io/v1beta2 kind: HTTPRoute metadata: name: my-route namespace: my-namespace spec: parentRefs: - name: my-service kind: Service group: core port: 8080 rules: - matches: - path: type: PathPrefix value: /api/v2 - headers: - name: x-api-version value: v2 backendRefs: - name: my-service-v2 port: 8080 - matches: - path: type: PathPrefix value: /api backendRefs: - name: my-service-v1 port: 8080 ``` ### Template 7: Multi-cluster Setup ```bash # On each cluster, install with cluster credentials linkerd multicluster install | kubectl apply -f - # Link clusters linkerd multicluster link --cluster-name west \ --api-server-address https://west.example.com:6443 \ | kubectl apply -f - # Export a service to other clusters kubectl label svc/my-service mirror.linkerd.io/exported=true # Verify cross-cluster connectivity linkerd multicluster check linkerd multicluster gateways ``` ## Monitoring Commands ```bash # Live traffic view linkerd viz top deploy/my-app # Per-route metrics linkerd viz routes deploy/my-app # Check proxy status linkerd viz stat deploy -n my-namespace # View service dependencies linkerd viz edges deploy -n my-namespace # Dashboard linkerd viz dashboard ``` ## Debugging ```bash # Check injection status linkerd check --proxy -n my-namespace # View proxy logs kubectl logs deploy/my-app -c linkerd-proxy # Debug identity/TLS linkerd identity -n my-namespace # Tap traffic (live) linkerd viz tap deploy/my-app --to deploy/my-backend ``` ## Best Practices ### Do's - **Enable mTLS everywhere** - It's automatic with Linkerd - **Use ServiceProfiles** - Get per-route metrics and retries - **Set retry budgets** - Prevent retry storms - **Monitor golden metrics** - Success rate, latency, throughput ### Don'ts - **Don't skip check** - Always run `linkerd check` after changes - **Don't over-configure** - Linkerd defaults are sensible - **Don't ignore ServiceProfiles** - They unlock advanced features - **Don't forget timeouts** - Set appropriate values per route ## Resources - [Linkerd Documentation](https://linkerd.io/2.14/overview/) - [Service Profiles](https://linkerd.io/2.14/features/service-profiles/) - [Authorization Policy](https://linkerd.io/2.14/features/server-policy/)
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

mtls-configuration

Configure mutual TLS (mTLS) for zero-trust service-to-service

architecture
⭐1
# mTLS Configuration Comprehensive guide to implementing mutual TLS for zero-trust service mesh communication. ## When to Use This Skill - Implementing zero-trust networking - Securing service-to-service communication - Certificate rotation and management - Debugging TLS handshake issues - Compliance requirements (PCI-DSS, HIPAA) - Multi-cluster secure communication ## Core Concepts ### 1. mTLS Flow ``` β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ Service β”‚ β”‚ Service β”‚ β”‚ A β”‚ β”‚ B β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚ β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β” TLS Handshake β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ Proxy │◄───────────────────────────►│ Proxy β”‚ β”‚(Sidecar)β”‚ 1. ClientHello β”‚(Sidecar)β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ 2. ServerHello + Cert β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ 3. Client Cert β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ 4. Verify Both Certs β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ 5. Encrypted Channel β”‚ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ ``` ### 2. Certificate Hierarchy ``` Root CA (Self-signed, long-lived) β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ Intermediate CA (Cluster-level) β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ Workload Cert (Service A) β”‚ └── Workload Cert (Service B) β”‚ └── Intermediate CA (Multi-cluster) β”‚ └── Cross-cluster certs ``` ## Templates ### Template 1: Istio mTLS (Strict Mode) ```yaml # Enable strict mTLS mesh-wide apiVersion: security.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: PeerAuthentication metadata: name: default namespace: istio-system spec: mtls: mode: STRICT --- # Namespace-level override (permissive for migration) apiVersion: security.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: PeerAuthentication metadata: name: default namespace: legacy-namespace spec: mtls: mode: PERMISSIVE --- # Workload-specific policy apiVersion: security.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: PeerAuthentication metadata: name: payment-service namespace: production spec: selector: matchLabels: app: payment-service mtls: mode: STRICT portLevelMtls: 8080: mode: STRICT 9090: mode: DISABLE # Metrics port, no mTLS ``` ### Template 2: Istio Destination Rule for mTLS ```yaml apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: DestinationRule metadata: name: default namespace: istio-system spec: host: "*.local" trafficPolicy: tls: mode: ISTIO_MUTUAL --- # TLS to external service apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: DestinationRule metadata: name: external-api spec: host: api.external.com trafficPolicy: tls: mode: SIMPLE caCertificates: /etc/certs/external-ca.pem --- # Mutual TLS to external service apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: DestinationRule metadata: name: partner-api spec: host: api.partner.com trafficPolicy: tls: mode: MUTUAL clientCertificate: /etc/certs/client.pem privateKey: /etc/certs/client-key.pem caCertificates: /etc/certs/partner-ca.pem ``` ### Template 3: Cert-Manager with Istio ```yaml # Install cert-manager issuer for Istio apiVersion: cert-manager.io/v1 kind: ClusterIssuer metadata: name: istio-ca spec: ca: secretName: istio-ca-secret --- # Create Istio CA secret apiVersion: v1 kind: Secret metadata: name: istio-ca-secret namespace: cert-manager type: kubernetes.io/tls data: tls.crt: <base64-encoded-ca-cert> tls.key: <base64-encoded-ca-key> --- # Certificate for workload apiVersion: cert-manager.io/v1 kind: Certificate metadata: name: my-service-cert namespace: my-namespace spec: secretName: my-service-tls duration: 24h renewBefore: 8h issuerRef: name: istio-ca kind: ClusterIssuer commonName: my-service.my-namespace.svc.cluster.local dnsNames: - my-service - my-service.my-namespace - my-service.my-namespace.svc - my-service.my-namespace.svc.cluster.local usages: - server auth - client auth ``` ### Template 4: SPIFFE/SPIRE Integration ```yaml # SPIRE Server configuration apiVersion: v1 kind: ConfigMap metadata: name: spire-server namespace: spire data: server.conf: | server { bind_address = "0.0.0.0" bind_port = "8081" trust_domain = "example.org" data_dir = "/run/spire/data" log_level = "INFO" ca_ttl = "168h" default_x509_svid_ttl = "1h" } plugins { DataStore "sql" { plugin_data { database_type = "sqlite3" connection_string = "/run/spire/data/datastore.sqlite3" } } NodeAttestor "k8s_psat" { plugin_data { clusters = { "demo-cluster" = { service_account_allow_list = ["spire:spire-agent"] } } } } KeyManager "memory" { plugin_data {} } UpstreamAuthority "disk" { plugin_data { key_file_path = "/run/spire/secrets/bootstrap.key" cert_file_path = "/run/spire/secrets/bootstrap.crt" } } } --- # SPIRE Agent DaemonSet (abbreviated) apiVersion: apps/v1 kind: DaemonSet metadata: name: spire-agent namespace: spire spec: selector: matchLabels: app: spire-agent template: spec: containers: - name: spire-agent image: ghcr.io/spiffe/spire-agent:1.8.0 volumeMounts: - name: spire-agent-socket mountPath: /run/spire/sockets volumes: - name: spire-agent-socket hostPath: path: /run/spire/sockets type: DirectoryOrCreate ``` ### Template 5: Linkerd mTLS (Automatic) ```yaml # Linkerd enables mTLS automatically # Verify with: # linkerd viz edges deployment -n my-namespace # For external services without mTLS apiVersion: policy.linkerd.io/v1beta1 kind: Server metadata: name: external-api namespace: my-namespace spec: podSelector: matchLabels: app: my-app port: external-api proxyProtocol: HTTP/1 # or TLS for passthrough --- # Skip TLS for specific port apiVersion: v1 kind: Service metadata: name: my-service annotations: config.linkerd.io/skip-outbound-ports: "3306" # MySQL ``` ## Certificate Rotation ```bash # Istio - Check certificate expiry istioctl proxy-config secret deploy/my-app -o json | \ jq '.dynamicActiveSecrets[0].secret.tlsCertificate.certificateChain.inlineBytes' | \ tr -d '"' | base64 -d | openssl x509 -text -noout # Force certificate rotation kubectl rollout restart deployment/my-app # Check Linkerd identity linkerd identity -n my-namespace ``` ## Debugging mTLS Issues ```bash # Istio - Check if mTLS is enabled istioctl authn tls-check my-service.my-namespace.svc.cluster.local # Verify peer authentication kubectl get peerauthentication --all-namespaces # Check destination rules kubectl get destinationrule --all-namespaces # Debug TLS handshake istioctl proxy-config log deploy/my-app --level debug kubectl logs deploy/my-app -c istio-proxy | grep -i tls # Linkerd - Check mTLS status linkerd viz edges deployment -n my-namespace linkerd viz tap deploy/my-app --to deploy/my-backend ``` ## Best Practices ### Do's - **Start with PERMISSIVE** - Migrate gradually to STRICT - **Monitor certificate expiry** - Set up alerts - **Use short-lived certs** - 24h or less for workloads - **Rotate CA periodically** - Plan for CA rotation - **Log TLS errors** - For debugging and audit ### Don'ts - **Don't disable mTLS** - For convenience in production - **Don't ignore cert expiry** - Automate rotation - **Don't use self-signed certs** - Use proper CA hierarchy - **Don't skip verification** - Verify the full chain ## Resources - [Istio Security](https://istio.io/latest/docs/concepts/security/) - [SPIFFE/SPIRE](https://spiffe.io/) - [cert-manager](https://cert-manager.io/) - [Zero Trust Architecture (NIST)](https://www.nist.gov/publications/zero-trust-architecture)
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

multi-reviewer-patterns

Coordinate parallel code reviews across multiple quality dimensions

coding
⭐1
# Multi-Reviewer Patterns Patterns for coordinating parallel code reviews across multiple quality dimensions, deduplicating findings, calibrating severity, and producing consolidated reports. ## When to Use This Skill - Organizing a multi-dimensional code review - Deciding which review dimensions to assign - Deduplicating findings from multiple reviewers - Calibrating severity ratings consistently - Producing a consolidated review report ## Review Dimension Allocation ### Available Dimensions | Dimension | Focus | When to Include | | ----------------- | --------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------- | | **Security** | Vulnerabilities, auth, input validation | Always for code handling user input or auth | | **Performance** | Query efficiency, memory, caching | When changing data access or hot paths | | **Architecture** | SOLID, coupling, patterns | For structural changes or new modules | | **Testing** | Coverage, quality, edge cases | When adding new functionality | | **Accessibility** | WCAG, ARIA, keyboard nav | For UI/frontend changes | ### Recommended Combinations | Scenario | Dimensions | | ---------------------- | -------------------------------------------- | | API endpoint changes | Security, Performance, Architecture | | Frontend component | Architecture, Testing, Accessibility | | Database migration | Performance, Architecture | | Authentication changes | Security, Testing | | Full feature review | Security, Performance, Architecture, Testing | ## Finding Deduplication When multiple reviewers report issues at the same location: ### Merge Rules 1. **Same file:line, same issue** β€” Merge into one finding, credit all reviewers 2. **Same file:line, different issues** β€” Keep as separate findings 3. **Same issue, different locations** β€” Keep separate but cross-reference 4. **Conflicting severity** β€” Use the higher severity rating 5. **Conflicting recommendations** β€” Include both with reviewer attribution ### Deduplication Process ``` For each finding in all reviewer reports: 1. Check if another finding references the same file:line 2. If yes, check if they describe the same issue 3. If same issue: merge, keeping the more detailed description 4. If different issue: keep both, tag as "co-located" 5. Use highest severity among merged findings ``` ## Severity Calibration ### Severity Criteria | Severity | Impact | Likelihood | Examples | | ------------ | --------------------------------------------- | ---------------------- | -------------------------------------------- | | **Critical** | Data loss, security breach, complete failure | Certain or very likely | SQL injection, auth bypass, data corruption | | **High** | Significant functionality impact, degradation | Likely | Memory leak, missing validation, broken flow | | **Medium** | Partial impact, workaround exists | Possible | N+1 query, missing edge case, unclear error | | **Low** | Minimal impact, cosmetic | Unlikely | Style issue, minor optimization, naming | ### Calibration Rules - Security vulnerabilities exploitable by external users: always Critical or High - Performance issues in hot paths: at least Medium - Missing tests for critical paths: at least Medium - Accessibility violations for core functionality: at least Medium - Code style issues with no functional impact: Low ## Consolidated Report Template ```markdown ## Code Review Report **Target**: {files/PR/directory} **Reviewers**: {dimension-1}, {dimension-2}, {dimension-3} **Date**: {date} **Files Reviewed**: {count} ### Critical Findings ({count}) #### [CR-001] {Title} **Location**: `{file}:{line}` **Dimension**: {Security/Performance/etc.} **Description**: {what was found} **Impact**: {what could happen} **Fix**: {recommended remediation} ### High Findings ({count}) ... ### Medium Findings ({count}) ... ### Low Findings ({count}) ... ### Summary | Dimension | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Total | | ------------ | -------- | ----- | ------ | ----- | ------ | | Security | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 6 | | Performance | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7 | | Architecture | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | | **Total** | **1** | **3** | **9** | **5** | **18** | ### Recommendation {Overall assessment and prioritized action items} ```
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ1
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

multi-cloud-architecture

Design multi-cloud architectures using a decision framework to

architecture
⭐1
# Multi-Cloud Architecture Decision framework and patterns for architecting applications across AWS, Azure, and GCP. ## Purpose Design cloud-agnostic architectures and make informed decisions about service selection across cloud providers. ## When to Use - Design multi-cloud strategies - Migrate between cloud providers - Select cloud services for specific workloads - Implement cloud-agnostic architectures - Optimize costs across providers ## Cloud Service Comparison ### Compute Services | AWS | Azure | GCP | Use Case | | ------- | ------------------- | --------------- | ------------------ | | EC2 | Virtual Machines | Compute Engine | IaaS VMs | | ECS | Container Instances | Cloud Run | Containers | | EKS | AKS | GKE | Kubernetes | | Lambda | Functions | Cloud Functions | Serverless | | Fargate | Container Apps | Cloud Run | Managed containers | ### Storage Services | AWS | Azure | GCP | Use Case | | ------- | --------------- | --------------- | -------------- | | S3 | Blob Storage | Cloud Storage | Object storage | | EBS | Managed Disks | Persistent Disk | Block storage | | EFS | Azure Files | Filestore | File storage | | Glacier | Archive Storage | Archive Storage | Cold storage | ### Database Services | AWS | Azure | GCP | Use Case | | ----------- | ---------------- | ------------- | --------------- | | RDS | SQL Database | Cloud SQL | Managed SQL | | DynamoDB | Cosmos DB | Firestore | NoSQL | | Aurora | PostgreSQL/MySQL | Cloud Spanner | Distributed SQL | | ElastiCache | Cache for Redis | Memorystore | Caching | **Reference:** See `references/service-comparison.md` for complete comparison ## Multi-Cloud Patterns ### Pattern 1: Single Provider with DR - Primary workload in one cloud - Disaster recovery in another - Database replication across clouds - Automated failover ### Pattern 2: Best-of-Breed - Use best service from each provider - AI/ML on GCP - Enterprise apps on Azure - General compute on AWS ### Pattern 3: Geographic Distribution - Serve users from nearest cloud region - Data sovereignty compliance - Global load balancing - Regional failover ### Pattern 4: Cloud-Agnostic Abstraction - Kubernetes for compute - PostgreSQL for database - S3-compatible storage (MinIO) - Open source tools ## Cloud-Agnostic Architecture ### Use Cloud-Native Alternatives - **Compute:** Kubernetes (EKS/AKS/GKE) - **Database:** PostgreSQL/MySQL (RDS/SQL Database/Cloud SQL) - **Message Queue:** Apache Kafka (MSK/Event Hubs/Confluent) - **Cache:** Redis (ElastiCache/Azure Cache/Memorystore) - **Object Storage:** S3-compatible API - **Monitoring:** Prometheus/Grafana - **Service Mesh:** Istio/Linkerd ### Abstraction Layers ``` Application Layer ↓ Infrastructure Abstraction (Terraform) ↓ Cloud Provider APIs ↓ AWS / Azure / GCP ``` ## Cost Comparison ### Compute Pricing Factors - **AWS:** On-demand, Reserved, Spot, Savings Plans - **Azure:** Pay-as-you-go, Reserved, Spot - **GCP:** On-demand, Committed use, Preemptible ### Cost Optimization Strategies 1. Use reserved/committed capacity (30-70% savings) 2. Leverage spot/preemptible instances 3. Right-size resources 4. Use serverless for variable workloads 5. Optimize data transfer costs 6. Implement lifecycle policies 7. Use cost allocation tags 8. Monitor with cloud cost tools **Reference:** See `references/multi-cloud-patterns.md` ## Migration Strategy ### Phase 1: Assessment - Inventory current infrastructure - Identify dependencies - Assess cloud compatibility - Estimate costs ### Phase 2: Pilot - Select pilot workload - Implement in target cloud - Test thoroughly - Document learnings ### Phase 3: Migration - Migrate workloads incrementally - Maintain dual-run period - Monitor performance - Validate functionality ### Phase 4: Optimization - Right-size resources - Implement cloud-native services - Optimize costs - Enhance security ## Best Practices 1. **Use infrastructure as code** (Terraform/OpenTofu) 2. **Implement CI/CD pipelines** for deployments 3. **Design for failure** across clouds 4. **Use managed services** when possible 5. **Implement comprehensive monitoring** 6. **Automate cost optimization** 7. **Follow security best practices** 8. **Document cloud-specific configurations** 9. **Test disaster recovery** procedures 10. **Train teams** on multiple clouds ## Reference Files - `references/service-comparison.md` - Complete service comparison - `references/multi-cloud-patterns.md` - Architecture patterns ## Related Skills - `terraform-module-library` - For IaC implementation - `cost-optimization` - For cost management - `hybrid-cloud-networking` - For connectivity
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

postgresql-table-design

Design a PostgreSQL-specific schema. Covers best-practices, data

data
⭐1
# PostgreSQL Table Design ## Core Rules - Define a **PRIMARY KEY** for reference tables (users, orders, etc.). Not always needed for time-series/event/log data. When used, prefer `BIGINT GENERATED ALWAYS AS IDENTITY`; use `UUID` only when global uniqueness/opacity is needed. - **Normalize first (to 3NF)** to eliminate data redundancy and update anomalies; denormalize **only** for measured, high-ROI reads where join performance is proven problematic. Premature denormalization creates maintenance burden. - Add **NOT NULL** everywhere it’s semantically required; use **DEFAULT**s for common values. - Create **indexes for access paths you actually query**: PK/unique (auto), **FK columns (manual!)**, frequent filters/sorts, and join keys. - Prefer **TIMESTAMPTZ** for event time; **NUMERIC** for money; **TEXT** for strings; **BIGINT** for integer values, **DOUBLE PRECISION** for floats (or `NUMERIC` for exact decimal arithmetic). ## PostgreSQL β€œGotchas” - **Identifiers**: unquoted β†’ lowercased. Avoid quoted/mixed-case names. Convention: use `snake_case` for table/column names. - **Unique + NULLs**: UNIQUE allows multiple NULLs. Use `UNIQUE (...) NULLS NOT DISTINCT` (PG15+) to restrict to one NULL. - **FK indexes**: PostgreSQL **does not** auto-index FK columns. Add them. - **No silent coercions**: length/precision overflows error out (no truncation). Example: inserting 999 into `NUMERIC(2,0)` fails with error, unlike some databases that silently truncate or round. - **Sequences/identity have gaps** (normal; don't "fix"). Rollbacks, crashes, and concurrent transactions create gaps in ID sequences (1, 2, 5, 6...). This is expected behaviorβ€”don't try to make IDs consecutive. - **Heap storage**: no clustered PK by default (unlike SQL Server/MySQL InnoDB); `CLUSTER` is one-off reorganization, not maintained on subsequent inserts. Row order on disk is insertion order unless explicitly clustered. - **MVCC**: updates/deletes leave dead tuples; vacuum handles themβ€”design to avoid hot wide-row churn. ## Data Types - **IDs**: `BIGINT GENERATED ALWAYS AS IDENTITY` preferred (`GENERATED BY DEFAULT` also fine); `UUID` when merging/federating/used in a distributed system or for opaque IDs. Generate with `uuidv7()` (preferred if using PG18+) or `gen_random_uuid()` (if using an older PG version). - **Integers**: prefer `BIGINT` unless storage space is critical; `INTEGER` for smaller ranges; avoid `SMALLINT` unless constrained. - **Floats**: prefer `DOUBLE PRECISION` over `REAL` unless storage space is critical. Use `NUMERIC` for exact decimal arithmetic. - **Strings**: prefer `TEXT`; if length limits needed, use `CHECK (LENGTH(col) <= n)` instead of `VARCHAR(n)`; avoid `CHAR(n)`. Use `BYTEA` for binary data. Large strings/binary (>2KB default threshold) automatically stored in TOAST with compression. TOAST storage: `PLAIN` (no TOAST), `EXTENDED` (compress + out-of-line), `EXTERNAL` (out-of-line, no compress), `MAIN` (compress, keep in-line if possible). Default `EXTENDED` usually optimal. Control with `ALTER TABLE tbl ALTER COLUMN col SET STORAGE strategy` and `ALTER TABLE tbl SET (toast_tuple_target = 4096)` for threshold. Case-insensitive: for locale/accent handling use non-deterministic collations; for plain ASCII use expression indexes on `LOWER(col)` (preferred unless column needs case-insensitive PK/FK/UNIQUE) or `CITEXT`. - **Money**: `NUMERIC(p,s)` (never float). - **Time**: `TIMESTAMPTZ` for timestamps; `DATE` for date-only; `INTERVAL` for durations. Avoid `TIMESTAMP` (without timezone). Use `now()` for transaction start time, `clock_timestamp()` for current wall-clock time. - **Booleans**: `BOOLEAN` with `NOT NULL` constraint unless tri-state values are required. - **Enums**: `CREATE TYPE ... AS ENUM` for small, stable sets (e.g. US states, days of week). For business-logic-driven and evolving values (e.g. order statuses) β†’ use TEXT (or INT) + CHECK or lookup table. - **Arrays**: `TEXT[]`, `INTEGER[]`, etc. Use for ordered lists where you query elements. Index with **GIN** for containment (`@>`, `<@`) and overlap (`&&`) queries. Access: `arr[1]` (1-indexed), `arr[1:3]` (slicing). Good for tags, categories; avoid for relationsβ€”use junction tables instead. Literal syntax: `'{val1,val2}'` or `ARRAY[val1,val2]`. - **Range types**: `daterange`, `numrange`, `tstzrange` for intervals. Support overlap (`&&`), containment (`@>`), operators. Index with **GiST**. Good for scheduling, versioning, numeric ranges. Pick a bounds scheme and use it consistently; prefer `[)` (inclusive/exclusive) by default. - **Network types**: `INET` for IP addresses, `CIDR` for network ranges, `MACADDR` for MAC addresses. Support network operators (`<<`, `>>`, `&&`). - **Geometric types**: `POINT`, `LINE`, `POLYGON`, `CIRCLE` for 2D spatial data. Index with **GiST**. Consider **PostGIS** for advanced spatial features. - **Text search**: `TSVECTOR` for full-text search documents, `TSQUERY` for search queries. Index `tsvector` with **GIN**. Always specify language: `to_tsvector('english', col)` and `to_tsquery('english', 'query')`. Never use single-argument versions. This applies to both index expressions and queries. - **Domain types**: `CREATE DOMAIN email AS TEXT CHECK (VALUE ~ '^[^@]+@[^@]+$')` for reusable custom types with validation. Enforces constraints across tables. - **Composite types**: `CREATE TYPE address AS (street TEXT, city TEXT, zip TEXT)` for structured data within columns. Access with `(col).field` syntax. - **JSONB**: preferred over JSON; index with **GIN**. Use only for optional/semi-structured attrs. ONLY use JSON if the original ordering of the contents MUST be preserved. - **Vector types**: `vector` type by `pgvector` for vector similarity search for embeddings. ### Do not use the following data types - DO NOT use `timestamp` (without time zone); DO use `timestamptz` instead. - DO NOT use `char(n)` or `varchar(n)`; DO use `text` instead. - DO NOT use `money` type; DO use `numeric` instead. - DO NOT use `timetz` type; DO use `timestamptz` instead. - DO NOT use `timestamptz(0)` or any other precision specification; DO use `timestamptz` instead - DO NOT use `serial` type; DO use `generated always as identity` instead. ## Table Types - **Regular**: default; fully durable, logged. - **TEMPORARY**: session-scoped, auto-dropped, not logged. Faster for scratch work. - **UNLOGGED**: persistent but not crash-safe. Faster writes; good for caches/staging. ## Row-Level Security Enable with `ALTER TABLE tbl ENABLE ROW LEVEL SECURITY`. Create policies: `CREATE POLICY user_access ON orders FOR SELECT TO app_users USING (user_id = current_user_id())`. Built-in user-based access control at the row level. ## Constraints - **PK**: implicit UNIQUE + NOT NULL; creates a B-tree index. - **FK**: specify `ON DELETE/UPDATE` action (`CASCADE`, `RESTRICT`, `SET NULL`, `SET DEFAULT`). Add explicit index on referencing columnβ€”speeds up joins and prevents locking issues on parent deletes/updates. Use `DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED` for circular FK dependencies checked at transaction end. - **UNIQUE**: creates a B-tree index; allows multiple NULLs unless `NULLS NOT DISTINCT` (PG15+). Standard behavior: `(1, NULL)` and `(1, NULL)` are allowed. With `NULLS NOT DISTINCT`: only one `(1, NULL)` allowed. Prefer `NULLS NOT DISTINCT` unless you specifically need duplicate NULLs. - **CHECK**: row-local constraints; NULL values pass the check (three-valued logic). Example: `CHECK (price > 0)` allows NULL prices. Combine with `NOT NULL` to enforce: `price NUMERIC NOT NULL CHECK (price > 0)`. - **EXCLUDE**: prevents overlapping values using operators. `EXCLUDE USING gist (room_id WITH =, booking_period WITH &&)` prevents double-booking rooms. Requires appropriate index type (often GiST). ## Indexing - **B-tree**: default for equality/range queries (`=`, `<`, `>`, `BETWEEN`, `ORDER BY`) - **Composite**: order mattersβ€”index used if equality on leftmost prefix (`WHERE a = ? AND b > ?` uses index on `(a,b)`, but `WHERE b = ?` does not). Put most selective/frequently filtered columns first. - **Covering**: `CREATE INDEX ON tbl (id) INCLUDE (name, email)` - includes non-key columns for index-only scans without visiting table. - **Partial**: for hot subsets (`WHERE status = 'active'` β†’ `CREATE INDEX ON tbl (user_id) WHERE status = 'active'`). Any query with `status = 'active'` can use this index. - **Expression**: for computed search keys (`CREATE INDEX ON tbl (LOWER(email))`). Expression must match exactly in WHERE clause: `WHERE LOWER(email) = 'user@example.com'`. - **GIN**: JSONB containment/existence, arrays (`@>`, `?`), full-text search (`@@`) - **GiST**: ranges, geometry, exclusion constraints - **BRIN**: very large, naturally ordered data (time-series)β€”minimal storage overhead. Effective when row order on disk correlates with indexed column (insertion order or after `CLUSTER`). ## Partitioning - Use for very large tables (>100M rows) where queries consistently filter on partition key (often time/date). - Alternate use: use for tables where data maintenance tasks dictates e.g. data pruned or bulk replaced periodically - **RANGE**: common for time-series (`PARTITION BY RANGE (created_at)`). Create partitions: `CREATE TABLE logs_2024_01 PARTITION OF logs FOR VALUES FROM ('2024-01-01') TO ('2024-02-01')`. **TimescaleDB** automates time-based or ID-based partitioning with retention policies and compression. - **LIST**: for discrete values (`PARTITION BY LIST (region)`). Example: `FOR VALUES IN ('us-east', 'us-west')`. - **HASH**: for even distribution when no natural key (`PARTITION BY HASH (user_id)`). Creates N partitions with modulus. - **Constraint exclusion**: requires `CHECK` constraints on partitions for query planner to prune. Auto-created for declarative partitioning (PG10+). - Prefer declarative partitioning or hypertables. Do NOT use table inheritance. - **Limitations**: no global UNIQUE constraintsβ€”include partition key in PK/UNIQUE. FKs from partitioned tables not supported; use triggers. ## Special Considerations ### Update-Heavy Tables - **Separate hot/cold columns**β€”put frequently updated columns in separate table to minimize bloat. - **Use `fillfactor=90`** to leave space for HOT updates that avoid index maintenance. - **Avoid updating indexed columns**β€”prevents beneficial HOT updates. - **Partition by update patterns**β€”separate frequently updated rows in a different partition from stable data. ### Insert-Heavy Workloads - **Minimize indexes**β€”only create what you query; every index slows inserts. - **Use `COPY` or multi-row `INSERT`** instead of single-row inserts. - **UNLOGGED tables** for rebuildable staging dataβ€”much faster writes. - **Defer index creation** for bulk loadsβ€”>drop index, load data, recreate indexes. - **Partition by time/hash** to distribute load. **TimescaleDB** automates partitioning and compression of insert-heavy data. - **Use a natural key for primary key** such as a (timestamp, device_id) if enforcing global uniqueness is important many insert-heavy tables don't need a primary key at all. - If you do need a surrogate key, **Prefer `BIGINT GENERATED ALWAYS AS IDENTITY` over `UUID`**. ### Upsert-Friendly Design - **Requires UNIQUE index** on conflict target columnsβ€”`ON CONFLICT (col1, col2)` needs exact matching unique index (partial indexes don't work). - **Use `EXCLUDED.column`** to reference would-be-inserted values; only update columns that actually changed to reduce write overhead. - **`DO NOTHING` faster** than `DO UPDATE` when no actual update needed. ### Safe Schema Evolution - **Transactional DDL**: most DDL operations can run in transactions and be rolled backβ€”`BEGIN; ALTER TABLE...; ROLLBACK;` for safe testing. - **Concurrent index creation**: `CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY` avoids blocking writes but can't run in transactions. - **Volatile defaults cause rewrites**: adding `NOT NULL` columns with volatile defaults (e.g., `now()`, `gen_random_uuid()`) rewrites entire table. Non-volatile defaults are fast. - **Drop constraints before columns**: `ALTER TABLE DROP CONSTRAINT` then `DROP COLUMN` to avoid dependency issues. - **Function signature changes**: `CREATE OR REPLACE` with different arguments creates overloads, not replacements. DROP old version if no overload desired. ## Generated Columns - `... GENERATED ALWAYS AS (<expr>) STORED` for computed, indexable fields. PG18+ adds `VIRTUAL` columns (computed on read, not stored). ## Extensions - **`pgcrypto`**: `crypt()` for password hashing. - **`uuid-ossp`**: alternative UUID functions; prefer `pgcrypto` for new projects. - **`pg_trgm`**: fuzzy text search with `%` operator, `similarity()` function. Index with GIN for `LIKE '%pattern%'` acceleration. - **`citext`**: case-insensitive text type. Prefer expression indexes on `LOWER(col)` unless you need case-insensitive constraints. - **`btree_gin`/`btree_gist`**: enable mixed-type indexes (e.g., GIN index on both JSONB and text columns). - **`hstore`**: key-value pairs; mostly superseded by JSONB but useful for simple string mappings. - **`timescaledb`**: essential for time-seriesβ€”automated partitioning, retention, compression, continuous aggregates. - **`postgis`**: comprehensive geospatial support beyond basic geometric typesβ€”essential for location-based applications. - **`pgvector`**: vector similarity search for embeddings. - **`pgaudit`**: audit logging for all database activity. ## JSONB Guidance - Prefer `JSONB` with **GIN** index. - Default: `CREATE INDEX ON tbl USING GIN (jsonb_col);` β†’ accelerates: - **Containment** `jsonb_col @> '{"k":"v"}'` - **Key existence** `jsonb_col ? 'k'`, **any/all keys** `?\|`, `?&` - **Path containment** on nested docs - **Disjunction** `jsonb_col @> ANY(ARRAY['{"status":"active"}', '{"status":"pending"}'])` - Heavy `@>` workloads: consider opclass `jsonb_path_ops` for smaller/faster containment-only indexes: - `CREATE INDEX ON tbl USING GIN (jsonb_col jsonb_path_ops);` - **Trade-off**: loses support for key existence (`?`, `?|`, `?&`) queriesβ€”only supports containment (`@>`) - Equality/range on a specific scalar field: extract and index with B-tree (generated column or expression): - `ALTER TABLE tbl ADD COLUMN price INT GENERATED ALWAYS AS ((jsonb_col->>'price')::INT) STORED;` - `CREATE INDEX ON tbl (price);` - Prefer queries like `WHERE price BETWEEN 100 AND 500` (uses B-tree) over `WHERE (jsonb_col->>'price')::INT BETWEEN 100 AND 500` without index. - Arrays inside JSONB: use GIN + `@>` for containment (e.g., tags). Consider `jsonb_path_ops` if only doing containment. - Keep core relations in tables; use JSONB for optional/variable attributes. - Use constraints to limit allowed JSONB values in a column e.g. `config JSONB NOT NULL CHECK(jsonb_typeof(config) = 'object')` ## Examples ### Users ```sql CREATE TABLE users ( user_id BIGINT GENERATED ALWAYS AS IDENTITY PRIMARY KEY, email TEXT NOT NULL UNIQUE, name TEXT NOT NULL, created_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL DEFAULT now() ); CREATE UNIQUE INDEX ON users (LOWER(email)); CREATE INDEX ON users (created_at); ``` ### Orders ```sql CREATE TABLE orders ( order_id BIGINT GENERATED ALWAYS AS IDENTITY PRIMARY KEY, user_id BIGINT NOT NULL REFERENCES users(user_id), status TEXT NOT NULL DEFAULT 'PENDING' CHECK (status IN ('PENDING','PAID','CANCELED')), total NUMERIC(10,2) NOT NULL CHECK (total > 0), created_at TIMESTAMPTZ NOT NULL DEFAULT now() ); CREATE INDEX ON orders (user_id); CREATE INDEX ON orders (created_at); ``` ### JSONB ```sql CREATE TABLE profiles ( user_id BIGINT PRIMARY KEY REFERENCES users(user_id), attrs JSONB NOT NULL DEFAULT '{}', theme TEXT GENERATED ALWAYS AS (attrs->>'theme') STORED ); CREATE INDEX profiles_attrs_gin ON profiles USING GIN (attrs); ```
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

gitlab-ci-patterns

Build GitLab CI/CD pipelines with multi-stage workflows, caching,

coding
⭐1
# GitLab CI Patterns Comprehensive GitLab CI/CD pipeline patterns for automated testing, building, and deployment. ## Purpose Create efficient GitLab CI pipelines with proper stage organization, caching, and deployment strategies. ## When to Use - Automate GitLab-based CI/CD - Implement multi-stage pipelines - Configure GitLab Runners - Deploy to Kubernetes from GitLab - Implement GitOps workflows ## Basic Pipeline Structure ```yaml stages: - build - test - deploy variables: DOCKER_DRIVER: overlay2 DOCKER_TLS_CERTDIR: "/certs" build: stage: build image: node:20 script: - npm ci - npm run build artifacts: paths: - dist/ expire_in: 1 hour cache: key: ${CI_COMMIT_REF_SLUG} paths: - node_modules/ test: stage: test image: node:20 script: - npm ci - npm run lint - npm test coverage: '/Lines\s*:\s*(\d+\.\d+)%/' artifacts: reports: coverage_report: coverage_format: cobertura path: coverage/cobertura-coverage.xml deploy: stage: deploy image: bitnami/kubectl:latest script: - kubectl apply -f k8s/ - kubectl rollout status deployment/my-app only: - main environment: name: production url: https://app.example.com ``` ## Docker Build and Push ```yaml build-docker: stage: build image: docker:24 services: - docker:24-dind before_script: - docker login -u $CI_REGISTRY_USER -p $CI_REGISTRY_PASSWORD $CI_REGISTRY script: - docker build -t $CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE:$CI_COMMIT_SHA . - docker build -t $CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE:latest . - docker push $CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE:$CI_COMMIT_SHA - docker push $CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE:latest only: - main - tags ``` ## Multi-Environment Deployment ```yaml .deploy_template: &deploy_template image: bitnami/kubectl:latest before_script: - kubectl config set-cluster k8s --server="$KUBE_URL" --insecure-skip-tls-verify=true - kubectl config set-credentials admin --token="$KUBE_TOKEN" - kubectl config set-context default --cluster=k8s --user=admin - kubectl config use-context default deploy:staging: <<: *deploy_template stage: deploy script: - kubectl apply -f k8s/ -n staging - kubectl rollout status deployment/my-app -n staging environment: name: staging url: https://staging.example.com only: - develop deploy:production: <<: *deploy_template stage: deploy script: - kubectl apply -f k8s/ -n production - kubectl rollout status deployment/my-app -n production environment: name: production url: https://app.example.com when: manual only: - main ``` ## Terraform Pipeline ```yaml stages: - validate - plan - apply variables: TF_ROOT: ${CI_PROJECT_DIR}/terraform TF_VERSION: "1.6.0" before_script: - cd ${TF_ROOT} - terraform --version validate: stage: validate image: hashicorp/terraform:${TF_VERSION} script: - terraform init -backend=false - terraform validate - terraform fmt -check plan: stage: plan image: hashicorp/terraform:${TF_VERSION} script: - terraform init - terraform plan -out=tfplan artifacts: paths: - ${TF_ROOT}/tfplan expire_in: 1 day apply: stage: apply image: hashicorp/terraform:${TF_VERSION} script: - terraform init - terraform apply -auto-approve tfplan dependencies: - plan when: manual only: - main ``` ## Security Scanning ```yaml include: - template: Security/SAST.gitlab-ci.yml - template: Security/Dependency-Scanning.gitlab-ci.yml - template: Security/Container-Scanning.gitlab-ci.yml trivy-scan: stage: test image: aquasec/trivy:latest script: - trivy image --exit-code 1 --severity HIGH,CRITICAL $CI_REGISTRY_IMAGE:$CI_COMMIT_SHA allow_failure: true ``` ## Caching Strategies ```yaml # Cache node_modules build: cache: key: ${CI_COMMIT_REF_SLUG} paths: - node_modules/ policy: pull-push # Global cache cache: key: ${CI_COMMIT_REF_SLUG} paths: - .cache/ - vendor/ # Separate cache per job job1: cache: key: job1-cache paths: - build/ job2: cache: key: job2-cache paths: - dist/ ``` ## Dynamic Child Pipelines ```yaml generate-pipeline: stage: build script: - python generate_pipeline.py > child-pipeline.yml artifacts: paths: - child-pipeline.yml trigger-child: stage: deploy trigger: include: - artifact: child-pipeline.yml job: generate-pipeline strategy: depend ``` ## Reference Files - `assets/gitlab-ci.yml.template` - Complete pipeline template - `references/pipeline-stages.md` - Stage organization patterns ## Best Practices 1. **Use specific image tags** (node:20, not node:latest) 2. **Cache dependencies** appropriately 3. **Use artifacts** for build outputs 4. **Implement manual gates** for production 5. **Use environments** for deployment tracking 6. **Enable merge request pipelines** 7. **Use pipeline schedules** for recurring jobs 8. **Implement security scanning** 9. **Use CI/CD variables** for secrets 10. **Monitor pipeline performance** ## Related Skills - `github-actions-templates` - For GitHub Actions - `deployment-pipeline-design` - For architecture - `secrets-management` - For secrets handling
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

workflow-patterns

Use this skill when implementing tasks according to Conductor's TDD

coding
⭐1
# Workflow Patterns Guide for implementing tasks using Conductor's TDD workflow, managing phase checkpoints, handling git commits, and executing the verification protocol that ensures quality throughout implementation. ## When to Use This Skill - Implementing tasks from a track's plan.md - Following TDD red-green-refactor cycle - Completing phase checkpoints - Managing git commits and notes - Understanding quality assurance gates - Handling verification protocols - Recording progress in plan files ## TDD Task Lifecycle Follow these 11 steps for each task: ### Step 1: Select Next Task Read plan.md and identify the next pending `[ ]` task. Select tasks in order within the current phase. Do not skip ahead to later phases. ### Step 2: Mark as In Progress Update plan.md to mark the task as `[~]`: ```markdown - [~] **Task 2.1**: Implement user validation ``` Commit this status change separately from implementation. ### Step 3: RED - Write Failing Tests Write tests that define the expected behavior before writing implementation: - Create test file if needed - Write test cases covering happy path - Write test cases covering edge cases - Write test cases covering error conditions - Run tests - they should FAIL Example: ```python def test_validate_user_email_valid(): user = User(email="test@example.com") assert user.validate_email() is True def test_validate_user_email_invalid(): user = User(email="invalid") assert user.validate_email() is False ``` ### Step 4: GREEN - Implement Minimum Code Write the minimum code necessary to make tests pass: - Focus on making tests green, not perfection - Avoid premature optimization - Keep implementation simple - Run tests - they should PASS ### Step 5: REFACTOR - Improve Clarity With green tests, improve the code: - Extract common patterns - Improve naming - Remove duplication - Simplify logic - Run tests after each change - they should remain GREEN ### Step 6: Verify Coverage Check test coverage meets the 80% target: ```bash pytest --cov=module --cov-report=term-missing ``` If coverage is below 80%: - Identify uncovered lines - Add tests for missing paths - Re-run coverage check ### Step 7: Document Deviations If implementation deviated from plan or introduced new dependencies: - Update tech-stack.md with new dependencies - Note deviations in plan.md task comments - Update spec.md if requirements changed ### Step 8: Commit Implementation Create a focused commit for the task: ```bash git add -A git commit -m "feat(user): implement email validation - Add validate_email method to User class - Handle empty and malformed emails - Add comprehensive test coverage Task: 2.1 Track: user-auth_20250115" ``` Commit message format: - Type: feat, fix, refactor, test, docs, chore - Scope: affected module or component - Summary: imperative, present tense - Body: bullet points of changes - Footer: task and track references ### Step 9: Attach Git Notes Add rich task summary as git note: ```bash git notes add -m "Task 2.1: Implement user validation Summary: - Added email validation using regex pattern - Handles edge cases: empty, no @, no domain - Coverage: 94% on validation module Files changed: - src/models/user.py (modified) - tests/test_user.py (modified) Decisions: - Used simple regex over email-validator library - Reason: No external dependency for basic validation" ``` ### Step 10: Update Plan with SHA Update plan.md to mark task complete with commit SHA: ```markdown - [x] **Task 2.1**: Implement user validation `abc1234` ``` ### Step 11: Commit Plan Update Commit the plan status update: ```bash git add conductor/tracks/*/plan.md git commit -m "docs: update plan - task 2.1 complete Track: user-auth_20250115" ``` ## Phase Completion Protocol When all tasks in a phase are complete, execute the verification protocol: ### Identify Changed Files List all files modified since the last checkpoint: ```bash git diff --name-only <last-checkpoint-sha>..HEAD ``` ### Ensure Test Coverage For each modified file: 1. Identify corresponding test file 2. Verify tests exist for new/changed code 3. Run coverage for modified modules 4. Add tests if coverage < 80% ### Run Full Test Suite Execute complete test suite: ```bash pytest -v --tb=short ``` All tests must pass before proceeding. ### Generate Manual Verification Steps Create checklist of manual verifications: ```markdown ## Phase 1 Verification Checklist - [ ] User can register with valid email - [ ] Invalid email shows appropriate error - [ ] Database stores user correctly - [ ] API returns expected response codes ``` ### WAIT for User Approval Present verification checklist to user: ``` Phase 1 complete. Please verify: 1. [ ] Test suite passes (automated) 2. [ ] Coverage meets target (automated) 3. [ ] Manual verification items (requires human) Respond with 'approved' to continue, or note issues. ``` Do NOT proceed without explicit approval. ### Create Checkpoint Commit After approval, create checkpoint commit: ```bash git add -A git commit -m "checkpoint: phase 1 complete - user-auth_20250115 Verified: - All tests passing - Coverage: 87% - Manual verification approved Phase 1 tasks: - [x] Task 1.1: Setup database schema - [x] Task 1.2: Implement user model - [x] Task 1.3: Add validation logic" ``` ### Record Checkpoint SHA Update plan.md checkpoints table: ```markdown ## Checkpoints | Phase | Checkpoint SHA | Date | Status | | ------- | -------------- | ---------- | -------- | | Phase 1 | def5678 | 2025-01-15 | verified | | Phase 2 | | | pending | ``` ## Quality Assurance Gates Before marking any task complete, verify these gates: ### Passing Tests - All existing tests pass - New tests pass - No test regressions ### Coverage >= 80% - New code has 80%+ coverage - Overall project coverage maintained - Critical paths fully covered ### Style Compliance - Code follows style guides - Linting passes - Formatting correct ### Documentation - Public APIs documented - Complex logic explained - README updated if needed ### Type Safety - Type hints present (if applicable) - Type checker passes - No type: ignore without reason ### No Linting Errors - Zero linter errors - Warnings addressed or justified - Static analysis clean ### Mobile Compatibility If applicable: - Responsive design verified - Touch interactions work - Performance acceptable ### Security Audit - No secrets in code - Input validation present - Authentication/authorization correct - Dependencies vulnerability-free ## Git Integration ### Commit Message Format ``` <type>(<scope>): <subject> <body> <footer> ``` Types: - `feat`: New feature - `fix`: Bug fix - `refactor`: Code change without feature/fix - `test`: Adding tests - `docs`: Documentation - `chore`: Maintenance ### Git Notes for Rich Summaries Attach detailed notes to commits: ```bash git notes add -m "<detailed summary>" ``` View notes: ```bash git log --show-notes ``` Benefits: - Preserves context without cluttering commit message - Enables semantic queries across commits - Supports track-based operations ### SHA Recording in plan.md Always record the commit SHA when completing tasks: ```markdown - [x] **Task 1.1**: Setup schema `abc1234` - [x] **Task 1.2**: Add model `def5678` ``` This enables: - Traceability from plan to code - Semantic revert operations - Progress auditing ## Verification Checkpoints ### Why Checkpoints Matter Checkpoints create restore points for semantic reversion: - Revert to end of any phase - Maintain logical code state - Enable safe experimentation ### When to Create Checkpoints Create checkpoint after: - All phase tasks complete - All phase verifications pass - User approval received ### Checkpoint Commit Content Include in checkpoint commit: - All uncommitted changes - Updated plan.md - Updated metadata.json - Any documentation updates ### How to Use Checkpoints For reverting: ```bash # Revert to end of Phase 1 git revert --no-commit <phase-2-commits>... git commit -m "revert: rollback to phase 1 checkpoint" ``` For review: ```bash # See what changed in Phase 2 git diff <phase-1-sha>..<phase-2-sha> ``` ## Handling Deviations During implementation, deviations from the plan may occur. Handle them systematically: ### Types of Deviations **Scope Addition** Discovered requirement not in original spec. - Document in spec.md as new requirement - Add tasks to plan.md - Note addition in task comments **Scope Reduction** Feature deemed unnecessary during implementation. - Mark tasks as `[-]` (skipped) with reason - Update spec.md scope section - Document decision rationale **Technical Deviation** Different implementation approach than planned. - Note deviation in task completion comment - Update tech-stack.md if dependencies changed - Document why original approach was unsuitable **Requirement Change** Understanding of requirement changes during work. - Update spec.md with corrected requirement - Adjust plan.md tasks if needed - Re-verify acceptance criteria ### Deviation Documentation Format When completing a task with deviation: ```markdown - [x] **Task 2.1**: Implement validation `abc1234` - DEVIATION: Used library instead of custom code - Reason: Better edge case handling - Impact: Added email-validator to dependencies ``` ## Error Recovery ### Failed Tests After GREEN If tests fail after reaching GREEN: 1. Do NOT proceed to REFACTOR 2. Identify which test started failing 3. Check if refactoring broke something 4. Revert to last known GREEN state 5. Re-approach the implementation ### Checkpoint Rejection If user rejects a checkpoint: 1. Note rejection reason in plan.md 2. Create tasks to address issues 3. Complete remediation tasks 4. Request checkpoint approval again ### Blocked by Dependency If task cannot proceed: 1. Mark task as `[!]` with blocker description 2. Check if other tasks can proceed 3. Document expected resolution timeline 4. Consider creating dependency resolution track ## TDD Variations by Task Type ### Data Model Tasks ``` RED: Write test for model creation and validation GREEN: Implement model class with fields REFACTOR: Add computed properties, improve types ``` ### API Endpoint Tasks ``` RED: Write test for request/response contract GREEN: Implement endpoint handler REFACTOR: Extract validation, improve error handling ``` ### Integration Tasks ``` RED: Write test for component interaction GREEN: Wire components together REFACTOR: Improve error propagation, add logging ``` ### Refactoring Tasks ``` RED: Add characterization tests for current behavior GREEN: Apply refactoring (tests should stay green) REFACTOR: Clean up any introduced complexity ``` ## Working with Existing Tests When modifying code with existing tests: ### Extend, Don't Replace - Keep existing tests passing - Add new tests for new behavior - Update tests only when requirements change ### Test Migration When refactoring changes test structure: 1. Run existing tests (should pass) 2. Add new tests for refactored code 3. Migrate test cases to new structure 4. Remove old tests only after new tests pass ### Regression Prevention After any change: 1. Run full test suite 2. Check for unexpected failures 3. Investigate any new failures 4. Fix regressions before proceeding ## Checkpoint Verification Details ### Automated Verification Run before requesting approval: ```bash # Test suite pytest -v --tb=short # Coverage pytest --cov=src --cov-report=term-missing # Linting ruff check src/ tests/ # Type checking (if applicable) mypy src/ ``` ### Manual Verification Guidance For manual items, provide specific instructions: ```markdown ## Manual Verification Steps ### User Registration 1. Navigate to /register 2. Enter valid email: test@example.com 3. Enter password meeting requirements 4. Click Submit 5. Verify success message appears 6. Verify user appears in database ### Error Handling 1. Enter invalid email: "notanemail" 2. Verify error message shows 3. Verify form retains other entered data ``` ## Performance Considerations ### Test Suite Performance Keep test suite fast: - Use fixtures to avoid redundant setup - Mock slow external calls - Run subset during development, full suite at checkpoints ### Commit Performance Keep commits atomic: - One logical change per commit - Complete thought, not work-in-progress - Tests should pass after every commit ## Best Practices 1. **Never skip RED**: Always write failing tests first 2. **Small commits**: One logical change per commit 3. **Immediate updates**: Update plan.md right after task completion 4. **Wait for approval**: Never skip checkpoint verification 5. **Rich git notes**: Include context that helps future understanding 6. **Coverage discipline**: Don't accept coverage below target 7. **Quality gates**: Check all gates before marking complete 8. **Sequential phases**: Complete phases in order 9. **Document deviations**: Note any changes from original plan 10. **Clean state**: Each commit should leave code in working state 11. **Fast feedback**: Run relevant tests frequently during development 12. **Clear blockers**: Address blockers promptly, don't work around them
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

auth-implementation-patterns

Master authentication and authorization patterns including JWT,

coding
⭐1
# Authentication & Authorization Implementation Patterns Build secure, scalable authentication and authorization systems using industry-standard patterns and modern best practices. ## When to Use This Skill - Implementing user authentication systems - Securing REST or GraphQL APIs - Adding OAuth2/social login - Implementing role-based access control (RBAC) - Designing session management - Migrating authentication systems - Debugging auth issues - Implementing SSO or multi-tenancy ## Core Concepts ### 1. Authentication vs Authorization **Authentication (AuthN)**: Who are you? - Verifying identity (username/password, OAuth, biometrics) - Issuing credentials (sessions, tokens) - Managing login/logout **Authorization (AuthZ)**: What can you do? - Permission checking - Role-based access control (RBAC) - Resource ownership validation - Policy enforcement ### 2. Authentication Strategies **Session-Based:** - Server stores session state - Session ID in cookie - Traditional, simple, stateful **Token-Based (JWT):** - Stateless, self-contained - Scales horizontally - Can store claims **OAuth2/OpenID Connect:** - Delegate authentication - Social login (Google, GitHub) - Enterprise SSO ## JWT Authentication ### Pattern 1: JWT Implementation ```typescript // JWT structure: header.payload.signature import jwt from "jsonwebtoken"; import { Request, Response, NextFunction } from "express"; interface JWTPayload { userId: string; email: string; role: string; iat: number; exp: number; } // Generate JWT function generateTokens(userId: string, email: string, role: string) { const accessToken = jwt.sign( { userId, email, role }, process.env.JWT_SECRET!, { expiresIn: "15m" }, // Short-lived ); const refreshToken = jwt.sign( { userId }, process.env.JWT_REFRESH_SECRET!, { expiresIn: "7d" }, // Long-lived ); return { accessToken, refreshToken }; } // Verify JWT function verifyToken(token: string): JWTPayload { try { return jwt.verify(token, process.env.JWT_SECRET!) as JWTPayload; } catch (error) { if (error instanceof jwt.TokenExpiredError) { throw new Error("Token expired"); } if (error instanceof jwt.JsonWebTokenError) { throw new Error("Invalid token"); } throw error; } } // Middleware function authenticate(req: Request, res: Response, next: NextFunction) { const authHeader = req.headers.authorization; if (!authHeader?.startsWith("Bearer ")) { return res.status(401).json({ error: "No token provided" }); } const token = authHeader.substring(7); try { const payload = verifyToken(token); req.user = payload; // Attach user to request next(); } catch (error) { return res.status(401).json({ error: "Invalid token" }); } } // Usage app.get("/api/profile", authenticate, (req, res) => { res.json({ user: req.user }); }); ``` ### Pattern 2: Refresh Token Flow ```typescript interface StoredRefreshToken { token: string; userId: string; expiresAt: Date; createdAt: Date; } class RefreshTokenService { // Store refresh token in database async storeRefreshToken(userId: string, refreshToken: string) { const expiresAt = new Date(Date.now() + 7 * 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000); await db.refreshTokens.create({ token: await hash(refreshToken), // Hash before storing userId, expiresAt, }); } // Refresh access token async refreshAccessToken(refreshToken: string) { // Verify refresh token let payload; try { payload = jwt.verify(refreshToken, process.env.JWT_REFRESH_SECRET!) as { userId: string; }; } catch { throw new Error("Invalid refresh token"); } // Check if token exists in database const storedToken = await db.refreshTokens.findOne({ where: { token: await hash(refreshToken), userId: payload.userId, expiresAt: { $gt: new Date() }, }, }); if (!storedToken) { throw new Error("Refresh token not found or expired"); } // Get user const user = await db.users.findById(payload.userId); if (!user) { throw new Error("User not found"); } // Generate new access token const accessToken = jwt.sign( { userId: user.id, email: user.email, role: user.role }, process.env.JWT_SECRET!, { expiresIn: "15m" }, ); return { accessToken }; } // Revoke refresh token (logout) async revokeRefreshToken(refreshToken: string) { await db.refreshTokens.deleteOne({ token: await hash(refreshToken), }); } // Revoke all user tokens (logout all devices) async revokeAllUserTokens(userId: string) { await db.refreshTokens.deleteMany({ userId }); } } // API endpoints app.post("/api/auth/refresh", async (req, res) => { const { refreshToken } = req.body; try { const { accessToken } = await refreshTokenService.refreshAccessToken(refreshToken); res.json({ accessToken }); } catch (error) { res.status(401).json({ error: "Invalid refresh token" }); } }); app.post("/api/auth/logout", authenticate, async (req, res) => { const { refreshToken } = req.body; await refreshTokenService.revokeRefreshToken(refreshToken); res.json({ message: "Logged out successfully" }); }); ``` ## Session-Based Authentication ### Pattern 1: Express Session ```typescript import session from "express-session"; import RedisStore from "connect-redis"; import { createClient } from "redis"; // Setup Redis for session storage const redisClient = createClient({ url: process.env.REDIS_URL, }); await redisClient.connect(); app.use( session({ store: new RedisStore({ client: redisClient }), secret: process.env.SESSION_SECRET!, resave: false, saveUninitialized: false, cookie: { secure: process.env.NODE_ENV === "production", // HTTPS only httpOnly: true, // No JavaScript access maxAge: 24 * 60 * 60 * 1000, // 24 hours sameSite: "strict", // CSRF protection }, }), ); // Login app.post("/api/auth/login", async (req, res) => { const { email, password } = req.body; const user = await db.users.findOne({ email }); if (!user || !(await verifyPassword(password, user.passwordHash))) { return res.status(401).json({ error: "Invalid credentials" }); } // Store user in session req.session.userId = user.id; req.session.role = user.role; res.json({ user: { id: user.id, email: user.email, role: user.role } }); }); // Session middleware function requireAuth(req: Request, res: Response, next: NextFunction) { if (!req.session.userId) { return res.status(401).json({ error: "Not authenticated" }); } next(); } // Protected route app.get("/api/profile", requireAuth, async (req, res) => { const user = await db.users.findById(req.session.userId); res.json({ user }); }); // Logout app.post("/api/auth/logout", (req, res) => { req.session.destroy((err) => { if (err) { return res.status(500).json({ error: "Logout failed" }); } res.clearCookie("connect.sid"); res.json({ message: "Logged out successfully" }); }); }); ``` ## OAuth2 / Social Login ### Pattern 1: OAuth2 with Passport.js ```typescript import passport from "passport"; import { Strategy as GoogleStrategy } from "passport-google-oauth20"; import { Strategy as GitHubStrategy } from "passport-github2"; // Google OAuth passport.use( new GoogleStrategy( { clientID: process.env.GOOGLE_CLIENT_ID!, clientSecret: process.env.GOOGLE_CLIENT_SECRET!, callbackURL: "/api/auth/google/callback", }, async (accessToken, refreshToken, profile, done) => { try { // Find or create user let user = await db.users.findOne({ googleId: profile.id, }); if (!user) { user = await db.users.create({ googleId: profile.id, email: profile.emails?.[0]?.value, name: profile.displayName, avatar: profile.photos?.[0]?.value, }); } return done(null, user); } catch (error) { return done(error, undefined); } }, ), ); // Routes app.get( "/api/auth/google", passport.authenticate("google", { scope: ["profile", "email"], }), ); app.get( "/api/auth/google/callback", passport.authenticate("google", { session: false }), (req, res) => { // Generate JWT const tokens = generateTokens(req.user.id, req.user.email, req.user.role); // Redirect to frontend with token res.redirect( `${process.env.FRONTEND_URL}/auth/callback?token=${tokens.accessToken}`, ); }, ); ``` ## Authorization Patterns ### Pattern 1: Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) ```typescript enum Role { USER = "user", MODERATOR = "moderator", ADMIN = "admin", } const roleHierarchy: Record<Role, Role[]> = { [Role.ADMIN]: [Role.ADMIN, Role.MODERATOR, Role.USER], [Role.MODERATOR]: [Role.MODERATOR, Role.USER], [Role.USER]: [Role.USER], }; function hasRole(userRole: Role, requiredRole: Role): boolean { return roleHierarchy[userRole].includes(requiredRole); } // Middleware function requireRole(...roles: Role[]) { return (req: Request, res: Response, next: NextFunction) => { if (!req.user) { return res.status(401).json({ error: "Not authenticated" }); } if (!roles.some((role) => hasRole(req.user.role, role))) { return res.status(403).json({ error: "Insufficient permissions" }); } next(); }; } // Usage app.delete( "/api/users/:id", authenticate, requireRole(Role.ADMIN), async (req, res) => { // Only admins can delete users await db.users.delete(req.params.id); res.json({ message: "User deleted" }); }, ); ``` ### Pattern 2: Permission-Based Access Control ```typescript enum Permission { READ_USERS = "read:users", WRITE_USERS = "write:users", DELETE_USERS = "delete:users", READ_POSTS = "read:posts", WRITE_POSTS = "write:posts", } const rolePermissions: Record<Role, Permission[]> = { [Role.USER]: [Permission.READ_POSTS, Permission.WRITE_POSTS], [Role.MODERATOR]: [ Permission.READ_POSTS, Permission.WRITE_POSTS, Permission.READ_USERS, ], [Role.ADMIN]: Object.values(Permission), }; function hasPermission(userRole: Role, permission: Permission): boolean { return rolePermissions[userRole]?.includes(permission) ?? false; } function requirePermission(...permissions: Permission[]) { return (req: Request, res: Response, next: NextFunction) => { if (!req.user) { return res.status(401).json({ error: "Not authenticated" }); } const hasAllPermissions = permissions.every((permission) => hasPermission(req.user.role, permission), ); if (!hasAllPermissions) { return res.status(403).json({ error: "Insufficient permissions" }); } next(); }; } // Usage app.get( "/api/users", authenticate, requirePermission(Permission.READ_USERS), async (req, res) => { const users = await db.users.findAll(); res.json({ users }); }, ); ``` ### Pattern 3: Resource Ownership ```typescript // Check if user owns resource async function requireOwnership( resourceType: "post" | "comment", resourceIdParam: string = "id", ) { return async (req: Request, res: Response, next: NextFunction) => { if (!req.user) { return res.status(401).json({ error: "Not authenticated" }); } const resourceId = req.params[resourceIdParam]; // Admins can access anything if (req.user.role === Role.ADMIN) { return next(); } // Check ownership let resource; if (resourceType === "post") { resource = await db.posts.findById(resourceId); } else if (resourceType === "comment") { resource = await db.comments.findById(resourceId); } if (!resource) { return res.status(404).json({ error: "Resource not found" }); } if (resource.userId !== req.user.userId) { return res.status(403).json({ error: "Not authorized" }); } next(); }; } // Usage app.put( "/api/posts/:id", authenticate, requireOwnership("post"), async (req, res) => { // User can only update their own posts const post = await db.posts.update(req.params.id, req.body); res.json({ post }); }, ); ``` ## Security Best Practices ### Pattern 1: Password Security ```typescript import bcrypt from "bcrypt"; import { z } from "zod"; // Password validation schema const passwordSchema = z .string() .min(12, "Password must be at least 12 characters") .regex(/[A-Z]/, "Password must contain uppercase letter") .regex(/[a-z]/, "Password must contain lowercase letter") .regex(/[0-9]/, "Password must contain number") .regex(/[^A-Za-z0-9]/, "Password must contain special character"); // Hash password async function hashPassword(password: string): Promise<string> { const saltRounds = 12; // 2^12 iterations return bcrypt.hash(password, saltRounds); } // Verify password async function verifyPassword( password: string, hash: string, ): Promise<boolean> { return bcrypt.compare(password, hash); } // Registration with password validation app.post("/api/auth/register", async (req, res) => { try { const { email, password } = req.body; // Validate password passwordSchema.parse(password); // Check if user exists const existingUser = await db.users.findOne({ email }); if (existingUser) { return res.status(400).json({ error: "Email already registered" }); } // Hash password const passwordHash = await hashPassword(password); // Create user const user = await db.users.create({ email, passwordHash, }); // Generate tokens const tokens = generateTokens(user.id, user.email, user.role); res.status(201).json({ user: { id: user.id, email: user.email }, ...tokens, }); } catch (error) { if (error instanceof z.ZodError) { return res.status(400).json({ error: error.errors[0].message }); } res.status(500).json({ error: "Registration failed" }); } }); ``` ### Pattern 2: Rate Limiting ```typescript import rateLimit from "express-rate-limit"; import RedisStore from "rate-limit-redis"; // Login rate limiter const loginLimiter = rateLimit({ store: new RedisStore({ client: redisClient }), windowMs: 15 * 60 * 1000, // 15 minutes max: 5, // 5 attempts message: "Too many login attempts, please try again later", standardHeaders: true, legacyHeaders: false, }); // API rate limiter const apiLimiter = rateLimit({ windowMs: 60 * 1000, // 1 minute max: 100, // 100 requests per minute standardHeaders: true, }); // Apply to routes app.post("/api/auth/login", loginLimiter, async (req, res) => { // Login logic }); app.use("/api/", apiLimiter); ``` ## Best Practices 1. **Never Store Plain Passwords**: Always hash with bcrypt/argon2 2. **Use HTTPS**: Encrypt data in transit 3. **Short-Lived Access Tokens**: 15-30 minutes max 4. **Secure Cookies**: httpOnly, secure, sameSite flags 5. **Validate All Input**: Email format, password strength 6. **Rate Limit Auth Endpoints**: Prevent brute force attacks 7. **Implement CSRF Protection**: For session-based auth 8. **Rotate Secrets Regularly**: JWT secrets, session secrets 9. **Log Security Events**: Login attempts, failed auth 10. **Use MFA When Possible**: Extra security layer ## Common Pitfalls - **Weak Passwords**: Enforce strong password policies - **JWT in localStorage**: Vulnerable to XSS, use httpOnly cookies - **No Token Expiration**: Tokens should expire - **Client-Side Auth Checks Only**: Always validate server-side - **Insecure Password Reset**: Use secure tokens with expiration - **No Rate Limiting**: Vulnerable to brute force - **Trusting Client Data**: Always validate on server ## Resources - **references/jwt-best-practices.md**: JWT implementation guide - **references/oauth2-flows.md**: OAuth2 flow diagrams and examples - **references/session-security.md**: Secure session management - **assets/auth-security-checklist.md**: Security review checklist - **assets/password-policy-template.md**: Password requirements template - **scripts/token-validator.ts**: JWT validation utility
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

git-advanced-workflows

Master advanced Git workflows including rebasing, cherry-picking,

coding
⭐1
# Git Advanced Workflows Master advanced Git techniques to maintain clean history, collaborate effectively, and recover from any situation with confidence. ## When to Use This Skill - Cleaning up commit history before merging - Applying specific commits across branches - Finding commits that introduced bugs - Working on multiple features simultaneously - Recovering from Git mistakes or lost commits - Managing complex branch workflows - Preparing clean PRs for review - Synchronizing diverged branches ## Core Concepts ### 1. Interactive Rebase Interactive rebase is the Swiss Army knife of Git history editing. **Common Operations:** - `pick`: Keep commit as-is - `reword`: Change commit message - `edit`: Amend commit content - `squash`: Combine with previous commit - `fixup`: Like squash but discard message - `drop`: Remove commit entirely **Basic Usage:** ```bash # Rebase last 5 commits git rebase -i HEAD~5 # Rebase all commits on current branch git rebase -i $(git merge-base HEAD main) # Rebase onto specific commit git rebase -i abc123 ``` ### 2. Cherry-Picking Apply specific commits from one branch to another without merging entire branches. ```bash # Cherry-pick single commit git cherry-pick abc123 # Cherry-pick range of commits (exclusive start) git cherry-pick abc123..def456 # Cherry-pick without committing (stage changes only) git cherry-pick -n abc123 # Cherry-pick and edit commit message git cherry-pick -e abc123 ``` ### 3. Git Bisect Binary search through commit history to find the commit that introduced a bug. ```bash # Start bisect git bisect start # Mark current commit as bad git bisect bad # Mark known good commit git bisect good v1.0.0 # Git will checkout middle commit - test it # Then mark as good or bad git bisect good # or: git bisect bad # Continue until bug found # When done git bisect reset ``` **Automated Bisect:** ```bash # Use script to test automatically git bisect start HEAD v1.0.0 git bisect run ./test.sh # test.sh should exit 0 for good, 1-127 (except 125) for bad ``` ### 4. Worktrees Work on multiple branches simultaneously without stashing or switching. ```bash # List existing worktrees git worktree list # Add new worktree for feature branch git worktree add ../project-feature feature/new-feature # Add worktree and create new branch git worktree add -b bugfix/urgent ../project-hotfix main # Remove worktree git worktree remove ../project-feature # Prune stale worktrees git worktree prune ``` ### 5. Reflog Your safety net - tracks all ref movements, even deleted commits. ```bash # View reflog git reflog # View reflog for specific branch git reflog show feature/branch # Restore deleted commit git reflog # Find commit hash git checkout abc123 git branch recovered-branch # Restore deleted branch git reflog git branch deleted-branch abc123 ``` ## Practical Workflows ### Workflow 1: Clean Up Feature Branch Before PR ```bash # Start with feature branch git checkout feature/user-auth # Interactive rebase to clean history git rebase -i main # Example rebase operations: # - Squash "fix typo" commits # - Reword commit messages for clarity # - Reorder commits logically # - Drop unnecessary commits # Force push cleaned branch (safe if no one else is using it) git push --force-with-lease origin feature/user-auth ``` ### Workflow 2: Apply Hotfix to Multiple Releases ```bash # Create fix on main git checkout main git commit -m "fix: critical security patch" # Apply to release branches git checkout release/2.0 git cherry-pick abc123 git checkout release/1.9 git cherry-pick abc123 # Handle conflicts if they arise git cherry-pick --continue # or git cherry-pick --abort ``` ### Workflow 3: Find Bug Introduction ```bash # Start bisect git bisect start git bisect bad HEAD git bisect good v2.1.0 # Git checks out middle commit - run tests npm test # If tests fail git bisect bad # If tests pass git bisect good # Git will automatically checkout next commit to test # Repeat until bug found # Automated version git bisect start HEAD v2.1.0 git bisect run npm test ``` ### Workflow 4: Multi-Branch Development ```bash # Main project directory cd ~/projects/myapp # Create worktree for urgent bugfix git worktree add ../myapp-hotfix hotfix/critical-bug # Work on hotfix in separate directory cd ../myapp-hotfix # Make changes, commit git commit -m "fix: resolve critical bug" git push origin hotfix/critical-bug # Return to main work without interruption cd ~/projects/myapp git fetch origin git cherry-pick hotfix/critical-bug # Clean up when done git worktree remove ../myapp-hotfix ``` ### Workflow 5: Recover from Mistakes ```bash # Accidentally reset to wrong commit git reset --hard HEAD~5 # Oh no! # Use reflog to find lost commits git reflog # Output shows: # abc123 HEAD@{0}: reset: moving to HEAD~5 # def456 HEAD@{1}: commit: my important changes # Recover lost commits git reset --hard def456 # Or create branch from lost commit git branch recovery def456 ``` ## Advanced Techniques ### Rebase vs Merge Strategy **When to Rebase:** - Cleaning up local commits before pushing - Keeping feature branch up-to-date with main - Creating linear history for easier review **When to Merge:** - Integrating completed features into main - Preserving exact history of collaboration - Public branches used by others ```bash # Update feature branch with main changes (rebase) git checkout feature/my-feature git fetch origin git rebase origin/main # Handle conflicts git status # Fix conflicts in files git add . git rebase --continue # Or merge instead git merge origin/main ``` ### Autosquash Workflow Automatically squash fixup commits during rebase. ```bash # Make initial commit git commit -m "feat: add user authentication" # Later, fix something in that commit # Stage changes git commit --fixup HEAD # or specify commit hash # Make more changes git commit --fixup abc123 # Rebase with autosquash git rebase -i --autosquash main # Git automatically marks fixup commits ``` ### Split Commit Break one commit into multiple logical commits. ```bash # Start interactive rebase git rebase -i HEAD~3 # Mark commit to split with 'edit' # Git will stop at that commit # Reset commit but keep changes git reset HEAD^ # Stage and commit in logical chunks git add file1.py git commit -m "feat: add validation" git add file2.py git commit -m "feat: add error handling" # Continue rebase git rebase --continue ``` ### Partial Cherry-Pick Cherry-pick only specific files from a commit. ```bash # Show files in commit git show --name-only abc123 # Checkout specific files from commit git checkout abc123 -- path/to/file1.py path/to/file2.py # Stage and commit git commit -m "cherry-pick: apply specific changes from abc123" ``` ## Best Practices 1. **Always Use --force-with-lease**: Safer than --force, prevents overwriting others' work 2. **Rebase Only Local Commits**: Don't rebase commits that have been pushed and shared 3. **Descriptive Commit Messages**: Future you will thank present you 4. **Atomic Commits**: Each commit should be a single logical change 5. **Test Before Force Push**: Ensure history rewrite didn't break anything 6. **Keep Reflog Aware**: Remember reflog is your safety net for 90 days 7. **Branch Before Risky Operations**: Create backup branch before complex rebases ```bash # Safe force push git push --force-with-lease origin feature/branch # Create backup before risky operation git branch backup-branch git rebase -i main # If something goes wrong git reset --hard backup-branch ``` ## Common Pitfalls - **Rebasing Public Branches**: Causes history conflicts for collaborators - **Force Pushing Without Lease**: Can overwrite teammate's work - **Losing Work in Rebase**: Resolve conflicts carefully, test after rebase - **Forgetting Worktree Cleanup**: Orphaned worktrees consume disk space - **Not Backing Up Before Experiment**: Always create safety branch - **Bisect on Dirty Working Directory**: Commit or stash before bisecting ## Recovery Commands ```bash # Abort operations in progress git rebase --abort git merge --abort git cherry-pick --abort git bisect reset # Restore file to version from specific commit git restore --source=abc123 path/to/file # Undo last commit but keep changes git reset --soft HEAD^ # Undo last commit and discard changes git reset --hard HEAD^ # Recover deleted branch (within 90 days) git reflog git branch recovered-branch abc123 ``` ## Resources - **references/git-rebase-guide.md**: Deep dive into interactive rebase - **references/git-conflict-resolution.md**: Advanced conflict resolution strategies - **references/git-history-rewriting.md**: Safely rewriting Git history - **assets/git-workflow-checklist.md**: Pre-PR cleanup checklist - **assets/git-aliases.md**: Useful Git aliases for advanced workflows - **scripts/git-clean-branches.sh**: Clean up merged and stale branches
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

track-management

Use this skill when creating, managing, or working with Conductor

coding
⭐1
# Track Management Guide for creating, managing, and completing Conductor tracks - the logical work units that organize features, bugs, and refactors through specification, planning, and implementation phases. ## When to Use This Skill - Creating new feature, bug, or refactor tracks - Writing or reviewing spec.md files - Creating or updating plan.md files - Managing track lifecycle from creation to completion - Understanding track status markers and conventions - Working with the tracks.md registry - Interpreting or updating track metadata ## Track Concept A track is a logical work unit that encapsulates a complete piece of work. Each track has: - A unique identifier - A specification defining requirements - A phased plan breaking work into tasks - Metadata tracking status and progress Tracks provide semantic organization for work, enabling: - Clear scope boundaries - Progress tracking - Git-aware operations (revert by track) - Team coordination ## Track Types ### feature New functionality or capabilities. Use for: - New user-facing features - New API endpoints - New integrations - Significant enhancements ### bug Defect fixes. Use for: - Incorrect behavior - Error conditions - Performance regressions - Security vulnerabilities ### chore Maintenance and housekeeping. Use for: - Dependency updates - Configuration changes - Documentation updates - Cleanup tasks ### refactor Code improvement without behavior change. Use for: - Code restructuring - Pattern adoption - Technical debt reduction - Performance optimization (same behavior, better performance) ## Track ID Format Track IDs follow the pattern: `{shortname}_{YYYYMMDD}` - **shortname**: 2-4 word kebab-case description (e.g., `user-auth`, `api-rate-limit`) - **YYYYMMDD**: Creation date in ISO format Examples: - `user-auth_20250115` - `fix-login-error_20250115` - `upgrade-deps_20250115` - `refactor-api-client_20250115` ## Track Lifecycle ### 1. Creation (newTrack) **Define Requirements** 1. Gather requirements through interactive Q&A 2. Identify acceptance criteria 3. Determine scope boundaries 4. Identify dependencies **Generate Specification** 1. Create `spec.md` with structured requirements 2. Document functional and non-functional requirements 3. Define acceptance criteria 4. List dependencies and constraints **Generate Plan** 1. Create `plan.md` with phased task breakdown 2. Organize tasks into logical phases 3. Add verification tasks after phases 4. Estimate effort and complexity **Register Track** 1. Add entry to `tracks.md` registry 2. Create track directory structure 3. Generate `metadata.json` 4. Create track `index.md` ### 2. Implementation **Execute Tasks** 1. Select next pending task from plan 2. Mark task as in-progress 3. Implement following workflow (TDD) 4. Mark task complete with commit SHA **Update Status** 1. Update task markers in plan.md 2. Record commit SHAs for traceability 3. Update phase progress 4. Update track status in tracks.md **Verify Progress** 1. Complete verification tasks 2. Wait for checkpoint approval 3. Record checkpoint commits ### 3. Completion **Sync Documentation** 1. Update product.md if features added 2. Update tech-stack.md if dependencies changed 3. Verify all acceptance criteria met **Archive or Delete** 1. Mark track as completed in tracks.md 2. Record completion date 3. Archive or retain track directory ## Specification (spec.md) Structure ```markdown # {Track Title} ## Overview Brief description of what this track accomplishes and why. ## Functional Requirements ### FR-1: {Requirement Name} Description of the functional requirement. - Acceptance: How to verify this requirement is met ### FR-2: {Requirement Name} ... ## Non-Functional Requirements ### NFR-1: {Requirement Name} Description of the non-functional requirement (performance, security, etc.) - Target: Specific measurable target - Verification: How to test ## Acceptance Criteria - [ ] Criterion 1: Specific, testable condition - [ ] Criterion 2: Specific, testable condition - [ ] Criterion 3: Specific, testable condition ## Scope ### In Scope - Explicitly included items - Features to implement - Components to modify ### Out of Scope - Explicitly excluded items - Future considerations - Related but separate work ## Dependencies ### Internal - Other tracks or components this depends on - Required context artifacts ### External - Third-party services or APIs - External dependencies ## Risks and Mitigations | Risk | Impact | Mitigation | | ---------------- | --------------- | ------------------- | | Risk description | High/Medium/Low | Mitigation strategy | ## Open Questions - [ ] Question that needs resolution - [x] Resolved question - Answer ``` ## Plan (plan.md) Structure ```markdown # Implementation Plan: {Track Title} Track ID: `{track-id}` Created: YYYY-MM-DD Status: pending | in-progress | completed ## Overview Brief description of implementation approach. ## Phase 1: {Phase Name} ### Tasks - [ ] **Task 1.1**: Task description - Sub-task or detail - Sub-task or detail - [ ] **Task 1.2**: Task description - [ ] **Task 1.3**: Task description ### Verification - [ ] **Verify 1.1**: Verification step for phase ## Phase 2: {Phase Name} ### Tasks - [ ] **Task 2.1**: Task description - [ ] **Task 2.2**: Task description ### Verification - [ ] **Verify 2.1**: Verification step for phase ## Phase 3: Finalization ### Tasks - [ ] **Task 3.1**: Update documentation - [ ] **Task 3.2**: Final integration test ### Verification - [ ] **Verify 3.1**: All acceptance criteria met ## Checkpoints | Phase | Checkpoint SHA | Date | Status | | ------- | -------------- | ---- | ------- | | Phase 1 | | | pending | | Phase 2 | | | pending | | Phase 3 | | | pending | ``` ## Status Marker Conventions Use consistent markers in plan.md: | Marker | Meaning | Usage | | ------ | ----------- | --------------------------- | | `[ ]` | Pending | Task not started | | `[~]` | In Progress | Currently being worked | | `[x]` | Complete | Task finished (include SHA) | | `[-]` | Skipped | Intentionally not done | | `[!]` | Blocked | Waiting on dependency | Example: ```markdown - [x] **Task 1.1**: Set up database schema `abc1234` - [~] **Task 1.2**: Implement user model - [ ] **Task 1.3**: Add validation logic - [!] **Task 1.4**: Integrate auth service (blocked: waiting for API key) - [-] **Task 1.5**: Legacy migration (skipped: not needed) ``` ## Track Registry (tracks.md) Format ```markdown # Track Registry ## Active Tracks | Track ID | Type | Status | Phase | Started | Assignee | | ------------------------------------------------ | ------- | ----------- | ----- | ---------- | ---------- | | [user-auth_20250115](tracks/user-auth_20250115/) | feature | in-progress | 2/3 | 2025-01-15 | @developer | | [fix-login_20250114](tracks/fix-login_20250114/) | bug | pending | 0/2 | 2025-01-14 | - | ## Completed Tracks | Track ID | Type | Completed | Duration | | ---------------------------------------------- | ----- | ---------- | -------- | | [setup-ci_20250110](tracks/setup-ci_20250110/) | chore | 2025-01-12 | 2 days | ## Archived Tracks | Track ID | Reason | Archived | | ---------------------------------------------------- | ---------- | ---------- | | [old-feature_20241201](tracks/old-feature_20241201/) | Superseded | 2025-01-05 | ``` ## Metadata (metadata.json) Fields ```json { "id": "user-auth_20250115", "title": "User Authentication System", "type": "feature", "status": "in-progress", "priority": "high", "created": "2025-01-15T10:30:00Z", "updated": "2025-01-15T14:45:00Z", "started": "2025-01-15T11:00:00Z", "completed": null, "assignee": "@developer", "phases": { "total": 3, "current": 2, "completed": 1 }, "tasks": { "total": 12, "completed": 5, "in_progress": 1, "pending": 6 }, "checkpoints": [ { "phase": 1, "sha": "abc1234", "date": "2025-01-15T13:00:00Z" } ], "dependencies": [], "tags": ["auth", "security"] } ``` ## Track Operations ### Creating a Track 1. Run `/conductor:new-track` 2. Answer interactive questions 3. Review generated spec.md 4. Review generated plan.md 5. Confirm track creation ### Starting Implementation 1. Read spec.md and plan.md 2. Verify context artifacts are current 3. Mark first task as `[~]` 4. Begin TDD workflow ### Completing a Phase 1. Ensure all phase tasks are `[x]` 2. Complete verification tasks 3. Wait for checkpoint approval 4. Record checkpoint SHA 5. Proceed to next phase ### Completing a Track 1. Verify all phases complete 2. Verify all acceptance criteria met 3. Update product.md if needed 4. Mark track completed in tracks.md 5. Update metadata.json ### Reverting a Track 1. Run `/conductor:revert` 2. Select track to revert 3. Choose granularity (track/phase/task) 4. Confirm revert operation 5. Update status markers ## Handling Track Dependencies ### Identifying Dependencies During track creation, identify: - **Hard dependencies**: Must complete before this track can start - **Soft dependencies**: Can proceed in parallel but may affect integration - **External dependencies**: Third-party services, APIs, or team decisions ### Documenting Dependencies In spec.md, list dependencies with: - Dependency type (hard/soft/external) - Current status (available/pending/blocked) - Resolution path (what needs to happen) ### Managing Blocked Tracks When a track is blocked: 1. Mark blocked tasks with `[!]` and reason 2. Update tracks.md status 3. Document blocker in metadata.json 4. Consider creating dependency track if needed ## Track Sizing Guidelines ### Right-Sized Tracks Aim for tracks that: - Complete in 1-5 days of work - Have 2-4 phases - Contain 8-20 tasks total - Deliver a coherent, testable unit ### Too Large Signs a track is too large: - More than 5 phases - More than 25 tasks - Multiple unrelated features - Estimated duration > 1 week Solution: Split into multiple tracks with clear boundaries. ### Too Small Signs a track is too small: - Single phase with 1-2 tasks - No meaningful verification needed - Could be a sub-task of another track - Less than a few hours of work Solution: Combine with related work or handle as part of existing track. ## Specification Quality Checklist Before finalizing spec.md, verify: ### Requirements Quality - [ ] Each requirement has clear acceptance criteria - [ ] Requirements are testable - [ ] Requirements are independent (can verify separately) - [ ] No ambiguous language ("should be fast" β†’ "response < 200ms") ### Scope Clarity - [ ] In-scope items are specific - [ ] Out-of-scope items prevent scope creep - [ ] Boundaries are clear to implementer ### Dependencies Identified - [ ] All internal dependencies listed - [ ] External dependencies have owners/contacts - [ ] Dependency status is current ### Risks Addressed - [ ] Major risks identified - [ ] Impact assessment realistic - [ ] Mitigations are actionable ## Plan Quality Checklist Before starting implementation, verify plan.md: ### Task Quality - [ ] Tasks are atomic (one logical action) - [ ] Tasks are independently verifiable - [ ] Task descriptions are clear - [ ] Sub-tasks provide helpful detail ### Phase Organization - [ ] Phases group related tasks - [ ] Each phase delivers something testable - [ ] Verification tasks after each phase - [ ] Phases build on each other logically ### Completeness - [ ] All spec requirements have corresponding tasks - [ ] Documentation tasks included - [ ] Testing tasks included - [ ] Integration tasks included ## Common Track Patterns ### Feature Track Pattern ``` Phase 1: Foundation - Data models - Database migrations - Basic API structure Phase 2: Core Logic - Business logic implementation - Input validation - Error handling Phase 3: Integration - UI integration - API documentation - End-to-end tests ``` ### Bug Fix Track Pattern ``` Phase 1: Reproduction - Write failing test capturing bug - Document reproduction steps Phase 2: Fix - Implement fix - Verify test passes - Check for regressions Phase 3: Verification - Manual verification - Update documentation if needed ``` ### Refactor Track Pattern ``` Phase 1: Preparation - Add characterization tests - Document current behavior Phase 2: Refactoring - Apply changes incrementally - Maintain green tests throughout Phase 3: Cleanup - Remove dead code - Update documentation ``` ## Best Practices 1. **One track, one concern**: Keep tracks focused on a single logical change 2. **Small phases**: Break work into phases of 3-5 tasks maximum 3. **Verification after phases**: Always include verification tasks 4. **Update markers immediately**: Mark task status as you work 5. **Record SHAs**: Always note commit SHAs for completed tasks 6. **Review specs before planning**: Ensure spec is complete before creating plan 7. **Link dependencies**: Explicitly note track dependencies 8. **Archive, don't delete**: Preserve completed tracks for reference 9. **Size appropriately**: Keep tracks between 1-5 days of work 10. **Clear acceptance criteria**: Every requirement must be testable
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered